Tuesday, 31 December 2013

Something to think about

Everybody has the right to be proud of their own identity and ethnicity without being called Racist.

Sometimes, we have to present reality in a certain way to make people think and to clearly see what is wrong. I am very much against something that in Britain is called Positive Discrimination. Firstly, I believe that the choice of words is unfortunate and, secondly, I believe that what they call Positive Discrimination is nothing more than Discrimination.

Positive Discrimination actually means Preferential Treatment for individuals of a certain ethnic origin. Positive Discrimination was applied in Apartheid South Africa. Positive Discrimination was also applied in National Socialist Germany. For many years, Positive Discrimination was applied in the United States of America against many ethnic groups and not just those of African descent but also Native Americans.

Those justifying Positive Discrimination based their reasoning on the implementation of quota systems and this is why, even today, people applying for a job in the United Kingdom have to fill up a questionnaire detailing their ethnic background. Having said that, in the United Kingdom, the system goes even further. They also ask you about gender, religion and sexual preferences. I believe the questionnaire is quite intrusive and unjustifiable on moral grounds.

As we approach 2014, it is time to let the past be past

When we approach a New Year, almost 70 years after the end of World War Two, the time is long overdue to stop blaming people, most of whom were not even born when World War Two came to and end.

The Culture of Blame directed against those who have nothing to do with the events of almost 70 years ago is a political tool to justify many of the ills of today and of not allowing people to utter any kind of criticism against things that are visibly wrong today.

The said Culture of Blame is so strong and so deeply rooted that the sole mention of any imagery or any reference to national identity is immediately rejected and ordinary people are forced to live in fear.

What the promoters of the said Culture of Blame miserably fail to understand is that their attitudes create resentment and hatred and that those who at the receiving end of this Culture of Blame will, once again, start using the symbols of the past to show their discontent and their rebellion against the oppression implemented by the said Culture of Blame.

Sunday, 29 December 2013

What did Goebbels, Eichmann and Mengele have in common? Dark eyes. Dark hair and Dark complexion

For decades after the fall of the Dritte Reich, our intelligence has been insulted with myths about Germany and what it meant to be German. The typical description of tall, light skinned and light eyed individuals with a propensity for violence depicted by the mass media has been no less of a fabrication than the dreams of an Aryan Race.

What is even more ridiculous is that some key players in the construction of the Reich that was going to  last a thousand years were themselves far different from the images the propaganda makers during and after the war tried to make us accept as the rule of what it meant to be Germanic.

Joseph Goebbels
Adolf Eichmann
Josef Mengele

The three men were said to be the archetypical image of those involved in positions of authority and highly recognized by the regime that ruled Germany between 1933 and 1945.

Dark hair, dark eyes, and dark complexion. The latter (Josef Mengele) even carried out experiments injecting blue dyes into the eyes of children to see if eye color could be changed by other means rather than inheritance.

The second one (Adolf Eichmann) was harassed as a school child because he didn't look the part of what people expected him to be. He used to be chased around the classroom by fellow pupils that called him: Jude, Jude (Jew, Jew)

So much for the stereotypes promoted today about what it meant to be German or Germanic, stereotypes that are fundamentally based on ignorance and over-generalizations.

Those who try and build political ideologies based on racial characteristics are very far off the mark and bound to make the same mistaken assumptions made many decades ago.

The one thing that united the three men aforementioned and the rest of Germany was their relationship with a political regime that for a while ruled much of Western Europe and beyond.

For those of us who honestly want to protect British Identity, shared ideas and shared principles are what matters most in terms of a National Identity. Multiculturalism is divisive, discriminatory and has nothing to do with building communities that can live in peace.

What we see today in Britain is the construction of ghettos leading to a cycle of suspicion, fear and confrontation in a country that is being colonized with flood immigration.

Nicolas Anelka: What do you know about 'anti-Semitic gestures'?

The day will come when all of us will have to tie up our hands behind our backs just in case somebody accuses us of having done 'anti-something gestures'.

I have been in politics for many years and this is the first time I become aware that putting your left hand the position shown on the picture is an 'anti-Semitic gesture'.

I bet that billons of people around the world did not have a clue that doing that was an 'anti-Semitic gesture'.

The behavior of the mass media is both childish and dangerous. Do we need any more controversies and confrontations because of what somebody did or didn't do during a football match? Do we need to have people giving sports a political dimension? I was born in a country in which football or soccer (whichever way you call it) is almost everything and I never expected to see so much nonsense written about what is no more than a sporting competition of men playing with a ball inside a rectangular field.

A few days ago, they were talking about the Yiddish Army and there was a series of scandals about the use of the expression Yiddish Army. The time is long overdue to forget about politics, to forget about racism, to forget about anything that is not directly linked to watching people kicking a ball and having a good time.

Let's treat football as what football is: football and nothing more.


BBC ousted, once again, for fraud

More than 200 BBC staff were made redundant, paid severance payments and then rehired with fixed term and permanent contracts.

The BBC revealed that 233 staff that had been made redundant and are back working for the corporation.

Angie Bray, a Conservative member of the Culture Select Committee says that licence fee-payers are being used as a cash cow. The BBC refused to name any of the executives who have been fired then rehired by the corporation.

Grant Shapps, the Conservative Party Chaiman, indicated that the corporation could lose its exclusive right to the licence fee due to its culture of waste and secrecy.

By the way, this is the BBC that criticized the financial arrangements of the British National Party.

When we say that the BBC is run by a bunch of crooks we are not far off the mark.

Saturday, 28 December 2013

Wikipedia asks users for money

Wikipedia is asking users for money to maintain the so called service that, incidentally, can be from time to time libelous and defamatory.

Some of the people behind Wikipedia - I say some because I cannot possibly generalize and include people who might be well intentioned and honest - have a very specific political agenda and whatever you do to change the wrongs done about you they behave like God on Earth and carry on publishing false information and fabrications as if they were the revealed truth.

There are certainly similarities between the British Broadcasting Corporation, otherwise known as BBC and paid for with taxpayers' money, and Wikipedia that is now asking users money so that it can stay alive without posting any kind of advertising. People I know have been so badly treated by Wikipedia pseudo editors that I don't feel practically any sympathy for so called Wikipedia.

Thursday, 26 December 2013

Reverse Shopping: The realities of American economics

I reckon not many people are aware of new expressions coming online all the time and one of these expressions is REVERSE SHOPPING. What does it mean? Before we sink our teeth into it, let's talk about the nonsensical approach to economics driven by Lib Lab Con and their acolytes.

Since the public start of the financial crisis in 2006, the talk has been about austerity, budget cuts, job losses, streamlining of the public administrations, et cetera, et cetera. Faced with astronomically growing public and private debt, the emphasis was put in reducing expenditure which directly led to loss of income for millions of families. This sudden reduction of buying power led to economic contraction with jobs losses followed by businesses failures followed by more job losses and more businesses failures.

Christmas time is a testing time. For thousands upon thousands of business both big and small, the Christmas sales are the difference between life and death. If businesses don't sell enough to have healthy balance sheets during the entire year, doom is unavoidable. So when Christmas time approaches, advertising companies go into overdrive and suddenly there are SALE signs all over the place on a 24-hour basis. Tempted by advertising and in a vain attempt to have some kind of optimism to counter their everyday frustrations vulnerable people suddenly go out and spend more than they can actually afford.

Aware of the Tsunami of debt that is created during Christmas time, a fast-food giant - MacDonald's - is advising its employees to return to the shops unwanted gifts as a way to recover some of the money they irrationally spent during the Christmas time. Returning merchandise to the shops is what has become known as REVERSE SHOPPING.

By the time people return goods to the shops, interest payments have already been collected on their credit cards. The credit companies make money and customers end up without goods and virtually ripped off.

In the USA the percentage of people living under the poverty line is in double digits and rising. The same financiers that created the crisis that publicly started in 2006 are still making money out of ordinary people's misery.

When you think about gifts bought during Christmas time, it feels a bit like the magician words 'now you see it, now you don't see it'. Customers paid got into additional debt and paid interest on debt to acquire goods that temporarily made them feel good about themselves. When celebrations are over, the gifts disappeared and their monies were taken away leaving them poorer and more frustrated.

Wednesday, 25 December 2013

Alexander Litvinenko was killed by British agents

As Russian oligarchs are useful idiots in the power games between the greater powers, minor agents like Alexander Litvinenko are used and later discarded when they become an embarrassment.

We will never know for certain the extent of the involvement of the former KGB agent in supporting Islamic terrorists in Chechnya and elsewhere. As lieutenant of Boris Berezovsky who had to flee Russia because of his dealings for billions of Pound, Alexander Litvinenko shared with Berezovsky close links with Chechnya and had converted to Islam. When he died, he was buried following Islamic traditions.

Andrei Lugovoi, the Russian politician, had had links with both Alexander Litvinenko and with Boris Berezovsky who himself was a darling of the Yeltsin administration. However, when the anti-Russian intentions and Chechen connections of Berezovsky became all too clear, Andrei Lugovoi wanted none of it and distanced himself from people that he understood were traitors. Andrei Lugovoi's love for Russia made him an obvious target.

Events were working very much against Litvinenko and Berezovsky. Since 2001, Britain had been involved in Afghanistan and British soldiers were dying on Muslim soil killed by Muslim fighters associated with Islamic extremists in Chechnya. The Blair administration found itself caught in a contradiction. On the one hand, war criminal Tony Blair wanted to help the enemies of Russia and on the other he couldn't possibly justify any kind of support for people who were friends of those killing British soldiers in Afghanistan.

Despite his political interests, Alexander Litvinenko's father wanted to return to Russia and Litvinenko's involvement with Berezovsky who was wanted for crimes committed in Russia was a natural obstacle. Here comes the twist in the story. The Russian government was aware of Litvinenko's father desire of returning to Russia and this is why they sent Andrei Lugovoi to London to ask Alexander Litvinenko to provide them with the necessary paperwork to make Boris Berezovsky position in Britain untenable.

Russia had been asking for Boris Berezovsky extradition for a long time and the British Establishment would not agree to extradite Berezovky who was also a CIA operative facilitating ways of escape for other operators, including relatives of deposed politicians, to evade prosecution. The same legal firm that worked for Berezovsky was involved in helping Russian criminals to settle down in Britain.

The sole possibility of Alexander Litvinenko reaching an agreement to help his father was a worrying scenario and the British Establishment decided to get rid of Alexander Litvinenko and this was done for two fundamental reasons. They had to protect Boris Berezovsky whose activities could become a serious political embarrassment at a time when Britain was at war in Afghanistan and to allow the continuation of anti-Russian activities. Naturally, to cover up the real motives for the assassination, they blamed Andrei Lugovoi and used the whole affair in the dirty war against Russia.

Boris Berezovsky, having lost his right-hand lieutenant, was becoming weaker and his usefulness in the war against Russia - Berezovsky himself had publicly stated that he wanted to bring down the Russian administration - was becoming a thing of the past. Berezovsky was loosing influence and finally lost his money in a dispute with Roman Abramovich. So, Boris Berezovsky became a notorious nuisance and the British Establishment got rid of him too. Firstly, they tried to make the public believe that Berezovsky had killed himself because he was extremely depressed having lost his power and his money. Later on, the news came that he had a string around his neck and after that no more explanations were given and in fact no explanation would have been necessary because nobody cared about a man whose political days and influence were over.

Russia had changed and Britain was involved in several conflicts in Muslim countries including Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003) and the influence some operators had was a thing of the past.

Marina Litvinenko - Alexander Litvinenko's widow - has repeatedly claimed the obvious: that Alexander Litvinenko was working for British Intelligence Services, something that British Intelligence Services have continued to deny. To sum up, Alexander Litvinenko was used by British Intelligence Services and was killed by British Intelligence Services when he became a liability for the Blair administration.

Monday, 23 December 2013

Kashmira Gander, writer for The Independent does not know the meaning of White Christmas

Kashmira Gander, a female writer for The Independent newspaper committed an intolerable mistake that shows her lack of cultural awareness regarding Christian traditions. In an article that appears today on the online version of The Independent she literally says that the use of the expression White Christmas together with the picture of a white European girl celebrating Christmas is 'racist'.

A formal complaint has been sent to the Press Complaints Commission and a formal complaint to The Independent newspaper has also been sent.

On this day and age, when we face so many problems generated by cultural differences, remedial action must be taken to educate people about Christian traditions so that mistakes like the mistake committed by Kashmira Gander don't happen again (or at least don't happen so often).

The Independent should ensure that its writers and editors have the necessary qualifications in terms of education and cultural awareness not to embarrass other members of its staff by transforming The Independent into a laughing stock.

Sunday, 22 December 2013

Vincent Cable wants to put up interest rates and abolish help for first-time home buyers

With typical Liberal Democrat insensitivity, Vincent Cable MP wants to abolish aid for first-time buyers and to put up interest rates. The political party that promised to oppose University Tuition Fees and later on supported the rise of University Tuition Fees strikes again.

Not ago, Simon Hughes MP was complaining in the house of commons that foreign investors are taking over all new housing in Bermondsey, when he openly supports Flood Immigration or, shall I say, when his political party support Flood Immigration.

A sudden rise of interest rates in a country in which millions are struggling to pay their mortgage instalments is like giving poison to a patient that is already struggling with food poisoning.

The Elitist Liberal Democrats don't give a damn about ordinary Britons in the same way that they didn't give a damn about cash strapped students who, most probably, after getting in debt to obtain a degree, with or without degree, will end up in debt and without a job because their jobs would have been taken away by foreigners before they even leave University.

Tuesday, 17 December 2013

Europe is heading towards War: Italy warns about political insurrection

The present economic environment is totally unsustainable. As France heads towards recession, Italy warns about political insurrection. Greedy bankers are talking about increasing interest rates and this will be the trigger that will destroy the middle-classes across Europe.

As long as the middle-classes are not affected, violence can be contained. It was the collapse of the middle-classes in Germany that led to Adolf Hitler's Rise. In the last few months, the middle-classes raided their saving accounts while those below have got themselves into debt at percentages of more than 1,000 per cent to try to make ends meet, in a losing battle for survival.

History repeats itself. Uncontrollable greed, massive speculation, and the absence of a real economy to support the value of the main currencies in a situation made worse by printing banknotes in what is deceptively called Quantitative Easing has created a bubble that is several times bigger than the 1929 bubble.

Monday, 16 December 2013

Cameron: Mission accomplished in Afghanistan? What was it?

Cameron Declares 'Mission Accomplished' in Afghanistan?
In 2001, the goal of the so called mission in Afghanistan was to counter AlQaeda as punishment for the USA bombings in September 2001. So, Peter from Saudi Arabia (most of the bombers who carried out the attacks were from Saudi Arabia) was the culprit and George from Afghanistan was attacked (mostly farmers and civilians who had nothing to do with the attacks carried out in the USA were 'carpet bombed' and killed without them having a clue of why they were under attack.)

Later on, when the International Community started to question the wisdom of bombing and invading Afghanistan, nobody knew for certain what the objectives of a war that has gone on for more than twelve-years actually were and those involved in the war didn't know either.

Most of Afghanistan has always remained in the hands of Taliban guerrillas anyway and the so called allies not even managed to control the territory they had actually invaded including the capital Kabul.

Soon after, the conflict spread into Pakistan and this is why in violation of the every rule in the book, with total disregard for International Law, the USA is now using drones to kill men, women and children (although the declared objective is to combat terrorism). Needless to say, they are killing people indiscriminately.

The AlQaeda threat has increased instead of decreased and is now present in the Indian Subcontinent, Asia Minor, the Middle East, Africa and the Western World as a whole.

Now, a happy-go-lucky Prime Minister tells us "Mission Accomplished in Afghanistan." Which one? What mission has been accomplished in Afghanistan? Taliban controls most of the country and as soon as Western foreigners leave they will take control of the entire country. Relationships with the Muslim World are worse than ever before, countries are more unstable than ever before and people are being slaughtered in religious conflicts.

If this was a tennis match, we could unanimously tell David Cameron 'You cannot be serious'.

Saturday, 14 December 2013

British Electorate: Turkeys voting for Christmas

We can blame politicians but in actual fact the responsibility for the present chaos lies on the shoulders of those who got them elected. People complain about financial mayhem, about housing crisis, health problems, transport costs, et cetera, et cetera, but they keep voting for the culprits.

As Christmas approaches and temperatures fall, our screens are full of campaign adverts to help the elderly cope with cold temperatures and rising food prices. When you think about it, you realise that the elder generations are paying the price for having supported Lib Lab Con and they continue supporting Lib Lab Con.

Who has been running the country without interruption? Lib Lab Con. Why? Because they get voted in over and over again. Do you want real change? Stop supporting Lib Lab Con. When I see younger generations calling those who can bring change Nazis, Fascists and so forth, I see the elder generations of the future who are going to face the same or worse problems because, as their elders do, they keep supporting Lib Lab Con.

Why they keep supporting Lib Lab Con? Is it due to mental disability? Is it due to ignorance? Well, brainwashing starts at a very early age and can only gets worse. They are turkeys voting for Christmas.

Friday, 13 December 2013

Thanks to USA, AlQaeda is winning the war in Iraq

News reports indicate that 'vast swathes of Iraq are now controlled by AlQaeda' that is also linked to AlQaeda rebels fighting in Syria.

Here is the account given about what is going on in Iraq facilitated by the United States of America.

"Ten years after the capture of Saddam Hussein, Iraq is at risk of becoming a failed state again as al-Qaeda reclaims vast swathes of the country. Friday’s anniversary of the Iraqi dictator's arrest sees the country still struggling with his legacy, with al-Qaeda launching a fresh campaign of terrorist atrocities from new territory carved out in western and northern Iraq. 

Backed by jihadists fighting the civil war in neighbouring Syria, the group is trying to create an “emirate” straddling the two countries, taking advantage of the collapse in security across the border.
Bridges linking four key border towns on the Iraqi side have been dynamited, making it difficult for security forces to operate in the area.
Road signs have even been put up proclaiming it to be the turf of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, the name for the joint Syrian-Iraqi al-Qaeda franchise."

Open your eyes. This is what thousands of American soldiers have given their lives for. Rather than fighting against terrorism, they have created fertile grounds for terrorism to prosper.

Thursday, 12 December 2013

Obama having a laugh at Mandela's funeral and a fake interpreter

For all the rehearsed shows of grief, the image of President Barak Obama, Prime Minister David Cameron and the daughter in law of former Labour Party Leader Neil Kinnock having fun at Mandela's Funeral shows the real picture behind a gigantic propaganda exercise with some mass media comparing Nelson Mandela to Jesus Christ.

As if this gigantic exhibition of sheer hypocrisy was not enough, we are faced with the news that the interpreter standing side by side with President Obama to translate formal speeches is mentally ill and hears voices and that hundreds of thousands of people were left wondering what the heck President Obama was talking about. But, there is more. Reportedly, it was not the first time a similar incident had occurred.

This is nothing more than yet another spectacle of a very expensive circus of people who are much detached from ordinary people and who used the mass media to keep themselves in their positions of privilege while ordinary people struggle to make ends meet.

In South Africa today there are more townships and more misery that there ever was during the years of Apartheid. The execution of black miners carried out by black Police officers acting under the ANC government didn't happen under the Apartheid Regime. South Africa is at the top of the list of countries suffering aids, prostitution including child prostitution to make ends meet, corruption, sexual violence including rape and racial violence.

When we talk about the legacy of Nelson Mandela, let's talk about today's South Africa and let's tell the truth about what is really happening when former ANC members and anybody daring to challenge a corrupt regime faces persecution.

Tuesday, 10 December 2013

You are all in it together. MPs give themselves 11% salary rise

Members of Parliament gave themselves an 11% salary rise as hundreds of thousands of British families are struggling to make ends meet. The ones who have already ran out of savings are being eaten away by loan sharks and the ones who are lucky enough to have savings left are raiding their savings to try and cope with the realities of Multicultural Britain and flood immigration.

Recently, the new Head of the Bank of England spoke about preventing a bubble created by a new wave of mortgages and remortgages that could fuel an unsustainable rising spiral in the housing market and this comes as a contradiction regarding measures implemented to help people acquire new housing units.

Some statistics show that the so called recovery is driven by a massive reduction of savings and that as soon as savings reach dangerous low levels spending would come a halt erasing any hopes of a sustainable economic recovery in a market that is barely surviving faced with depression.

In this context, any two digit salary increases for those who have already access to a wide range of privileges is not only excessive but also extremely dangerous.

Monday, 9 December 2013

Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria and now Ukraina?

It seems that our rulers' appetite for civil wars, wars and mass murder can never be satisfied. They are now actively promoting a civil war in Ukraina (I use the real name of the country rather than the English translation: Ukraine).

If you thought that only Catholic and Protestant Christianity and Christianity in Muslim and African countries are under attack, think again. Now the political terrorists of the European Union are trying to undermine Ukraina, a country where the Christian Orthodox Tradition is the rule.

Ukraina also plays a pivotal role having one of the oldest Russian cities - Sebastopol - that also happens to be a Black Sea Naval Base of the Russian Federation.

After dismembering Yugoslavia, destroying Libya and attacking Syria, our rulers now want to destabilize Ukraina and create a civil war.

Their thirst for illegal invasions, wars between countries and civil wars seems unquenchable.  

Sunday, 8 December 2013

True British Nationalism and Political Gimmicks

Thanks to their association with symbols of Das Dritte Reich, in Britain the National Front and other so called Nationalist organizations never managed to achieve real political success in a country in which both its armed forces and its civilian population suffered the bloody consequences of World War Two.

The images of Dunkirk, the sacrifices of the British merchant Navy, the Battle of Britain, the Vergeltung rockets and later on the atrocities that became apparent as Das Dritte Reich was coming to an end were a powerful message that no rational individual could ever possibly ignore and therefore anybody wanting to use the symbols of Das Dritte Reich in British politics was bound to fail miserably.

I simply cannot understand what went on in the minds of individuals who calling themselves British Nationalists showed allegiance to the ideas of those who tried to destroy Britain. British traditions and the British Empire had achieved a lot more than a dictatorial regime that merely lasted 13 years. So, what led them to reject their true British Identity? National Socialist salutes, Armbands and black shirts could only alienate ordinary Britons rightly proud of their British Heritage.

Funnily enough, the same kind of phenomena have occurred in America and even in Russia that lost more than 25 million people during World War Two. I can only attribute such phenomena to sheer ignorance and to the most catastrophic lack of understanding.

Karl Gerhardt Hohenstauffen

Friday, 6 December 2013

Terrorism on British soil should be punishable by death

When Osama bin Laden was killed by American Special Forces, they celebrated the passing of a terrorist that fuelled hatred against any Westerners regardless of who they were and look forward to 'punish' those who had nothing to do with the abuses committed against Muslims across the world.

Osama bin Laden was not killed. Osama bin Laden was executed. In the case of Osama bin Laden the sovereignty of Pakistan was violated but what happened in London, United Kingdom, happened on British soil. Why should the fate of those involved in the assassination of a British soldier in London receive preferential treatment? There should be one policy against terrorism regardless of who they are.

This is why the British National Party asked for the death penalty to be reinstated and carried out in the case of those who attacked a British soldier on British soil.

Sunday, 1 December 2013

World War Two and Post World War Two inconsistencies that led to conflict

The Europe of Klemens von Metternich was the kind of Europe in which conflicts between countries could be resolved with territorial exchanges. The country that would be unlucky in the first round, could try its luck in the next round and perhaps regain the territories lost. Wars were not supposed to be wars of extermination.

This kind of mentality overrode any other consideration. By the end of World War One, German territories were given to Poland, German cities like Danzig and Memel were taken away and Eastern Germany, including Konisberg (birthplace of German Philosopher Emmanuel Kant), was isolated from the rest of Germany. New countries were born out of the disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Czechoslovakia was one of them.

In 1938 in Munich, Germany forced the hands of all other contenders by requesting that the Sudetenland, a region of the new Czechoslovakia mainly inhabited by German peoples, had to become part of Germany. Months later, after Poland refused to allow free passage between Western Germany and Eastern Germany through territories that were very much part of Germany before World War One, Europe was faced with yet another war.

The rationality of the Metternich style of territorial distribution had come to an abrupt conclusion and territorial exchanges were no longer a way to secure peace. Moreover, while Britain, France, Italy, Russia and others were happy to give a chunk of Czechoslovakia to Germany (a piece of land that had not belonged to Germany), the same countries were ready to go to war against Germany when Germany reclaimed territories that were actually German territories. Logic or mere irrational and misguided arguments?

Sarajevo, the Serbian city, the place where the heir to the Crown of Austro-Hungary had been assassinated, event that led to World War One, is no longer in Christian Serbian hands but under Muslim control in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The rightful owners of Sarajevo were bombed and Serbia was deprived of Serbian territories. Then again, logic or mere irrational and misguided arguments?

The colonisation of Africa and of the Subcontinent followed the same rules, dividing territories without taking into account ethnic realities and many of the conflicts that followed were the direct consequence of ignoring such ethnic realities.

Flood immigration is bound to lead to conflicts and violence. By ignoring ethnic realities, simply by throwing people together, we are creating ghettos with conflicting interests and conflicting ways of living.

UK: Nuclear Reactors, Faslane, Energy Cost and other issues

Most people, concerned with the realities of everyday life could be perhaps forgiven for not thinking about the big issues that affect the country. This is why we dedicate a considerable amount of time to talk about issues that might not be in everybody's minds.

As we know, the United Kingdom depends of several sources of energy including oil and gas from the North Sea, electricity bought in Europe and gas contracts with countries like Qatar. As population grows - population has grown dramatically driven by flood immigration and it is forecast that it will continue growing at fast pace as more people come from other EU countries and from outside the European Union to settle down in Britain - the country needs more and more energy that needs to be produced or acquired at higher costs.

At the moment Britain has a certain number of nuclear reactors most of which will have to be decommissioned in the next few years. The business of decommissioning nuclear reactors is extremely expensive and difficult and so is the construction of new nuclear reactors. Until now, only one reactor has been projected and would be built in Somerset and this by no means make us feel optimistic about the levels of energy supply in coming years.

Until now, the United Kingdom has benefitted from oil and gas exploration in several ways and this includes tax revenues generated by activities linked to oil and gas. Even the possibility of Scotland becoming independent generates serious doubts about how what is left of the United Kingdom will be able to deal with a sudden loss of energy supplies and sudden loss of tax revenues.

As if the aforementioned issues were not serious enough, there is another dimension of decisions being taken at this very minute and the following has to do with the capacity to maintain a nuclear deterrent and to be able to sustain a credible defensive structure as the country might no longer be able to create strategic military resources.

Should Scotland become independent, as Head of the Scottish Parliament Alex Salmond has stated that Scotland will no longer host nuclear submarines that make the nuclear deterrent possible and military naval installations in Faslane will no longer be available for what remains of the United Kingdom. The future of ship building and other Defense related industries is very much in doubt.

A fragmented and weakened United Kingdom will no longer be able to protect its strategic interests nor defend itself and this is a very worrying scenario indeed.

In 1982, the United Kingdom was a stronger country with a more homogenous population. Today, most of the strengths the United Kingdom had then have been lost. The country has been dismantled bit by bit, most of what is used or consumed in the United Kingdom is imported or is produced by  foreign companies and its Armed Forces are merely a shadow of a very glorious and optimistic past.

Having to increasingly depend on imports, will the United Kingdom be able to continue playing a pivotal role in strategic military arrangements? What we know does not offer us any reasons to be optimistic in terms of energy supplies and in terms of Britain's survival as a major player.

Calling ourselves Human Beings doesn't change the fact that we are animals

It is comical and sometimes tragic to hear or read comments made by people that ignore the fact that despite calling ourselves Human Beings we are still very much Animals that can be classified according to certain characteristics.

Nick Clegg felt offended by Boris Johnson's words about people who are more able or less able than others, more intelligent or less intelligent than others, cleverer or less clever than others.

Nick Clegg said that Boris Johnson was referring to people as if they were 'a breed of dogs'. Well, we might not be 'a breed of dogs' but there are still breeds of Human Beings with more potential or less potential than others because of their individual characteristics.

Boris Johnson is wrong to talk about people like “a breed of dogs” and his views on social mobility show “unpleasant, careless elitism” Nick Clegg said. In a speech at the Margaret Thatcher lecture, Boris Johnson suggested that economic equality will never be possible because some people are too stupid to get ahead.

Elitism? What elitism? Those who have talents and use them to better themselves, go forward. Those who have talents and don't do the effort and those who don't have talents stay behind. Life is very much like an Olympic Marathon.

The Lib Dem Leader is nothing more than a Demagogue pretending to be nice by telling everybody that all of them can be Olympic Champions. Being honest is not the same as being uncaring. Quite the opposite.

We struggle so that everybody can have a decent life but we don't forget for a second the characteristics that make us different from each other. We treat everybody with kindness because we believe that this is the essence of being Human and Humane.