Sunday, 27 May 2018

What do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson have in common?

What do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson have in common?

For more than 16 years, children were being raped in places like Rotherham and other British cities and so called mainstream political parties and Police were doing practically absolutely nothing to protect those being abused because they were afraid of being accused of racism.

Organisations that were supposed to protect vulnerable children looked the other way and rape gangs could do their dirty business unmolested. They were so confident than in some cases taxi services were used to transport children to places where gangs plied them with alcohol and drugs and gang raped them.

When a well-known Far Right leader spoke to the BBC, the BBC accused him of being racist for daring to raise the issue that is today widespread news and not long after the BBC itself was rocked by a scandal involving well-known entertainers that even used BBC facilities to carry out sexual activities with minors.

Now, what do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson have in common? All of them have spoken openly about Muslim rape gangs and against Muslim terrorism while British authorities have indicated that they are actively working to prevent Muslim terrorist attacks.

Police authorities and Anti-Terrorism organisations within the Security Services did not prevent what happened on July 7, 2005. They did not prevent either the beheading of a British soldier close to military headquarters in London. They knew the to-be culprits long before they perpetrated attacks that left more than 50 dead and many more injured. They even tried to recruit the killers of Lee Rigby.

What do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson also have in common? They have been arrested, trialed and convicted. We have come to the point that more Police resources are being used against those who denounce crime. This is certainly a paradox when Police representatives have gone as far as asking parents to denounce their children and teachers to denounce pupils if there is any suspicion regarding their involvement in terrorist activities. Needless to say, it is a monstrosity to ask parents to denounce their own children and it is also a monstrosity to ask teachers to denounce their own pupils.

But this is just part of the picture. Even a joke, something done merely as a joke, without intent to cause damage and without hatred, can land anybody in serious trouble in a legal system in which courts are eager to prosecute and convict those accused to appease or gratify vested interests. When this happens, Justice goes out through the window and a Totalitarian State is born.

There are also attempts to censor people who use social media and threats have been made against social media providers. Power and control, repression, persecution, demonizing, prosecution and incarceration are now the rule rather than the exception in an environment that is increasingly unstable in a very fragmented British political and social reality.

In the meantime, the number of victims of stabbing and gun crime keeps rising. Whether it is about issues involving Jews, Muslims or people leaving on the fringes of society, the country is in a state of flux. Add to this the complications arising from political issues and geopolitical issues and you get an explosive mix. I haven't included factors related to an economic reality in which people find themselves in ever more difficult financial circumstances that lead to dysfunctional families and mental and physical health problems.

This is not a very optimistic description of what is happening in Britain but even less optimistic events will follow sooner than later that could put an end to the United Kingdom as we know it. The man that some say could be the next British Prime Minister favors what some call a 'United Ireland', knowing the implications of supporting such a move.

Therefore, wherever you look you can see impending crisis. If you criticize a Jew or a Muslim, somebody would be offended and you could end up in court and facing jail. But if you support murdering babies, the mass media will rejoice and you could become a celebrity. People in the Republic of Ireland voted in favour of the Babies Holocaust.

Sunday, 20 May 2018

Dehumanisation of a British Society that is increasingly Totalitarian

Apparently it is not enough with having Political Police and kangaroo courts controlled by private lobbies. Dispossessed people are being systematically persecuted.

Thursday, 17 May 2018

The extent of Jewish Power in the United Kingdom

Gideon Falter

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism might appear to be an innocent title for an organisation that would merely be about preventing attacks against members of Jewish Communities but then you start digging up and finding things that you wish were not there. The ramifications go as far as affecting the administration of justice, the mass media, political parties and Parliament as a whole and even the Church of England that is supposed to be representing Christianity in the United Kingdom.

But it doesn't stop there. When you try and understand the motivations of the British Prime Minister in - for example - launching a missile attack against Syria based on lack of evidence and that constitutes a violation of International Law by bypassing the Security Council of the Organisations of the United Nations and engaging in military actions against countries that are not at war with the United Kingdom, sooner than later you come across Jewish lobbies. The well publicised visit of Priti Patel to Israel going to occupied territories and maintaining secret conversations without the knowledge of the Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson shows things as they are.

Gideon Falter, head of CAA, made explicitly clear that his organisation works in close cooperation with 10 Downing Street (the office of the British Prime Minister, the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service) but it goes much farther than that. When you look at the list of 'sponsors and/or members of the Management you find a former Archbishop of Canterbury and people who are very active within the Crown Prosecution Service and prominent figures of the Political Establishment.

The RT HON. The Baron

Lord Ahmad is the Minister for the Commonwealth and the United Nations at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. He was formerly the Parliamentary Under Secretary for countering extremism at the Home Office. During his political career he has taken a particular interest in communities and integration, and has ensured that Home Office Policy reflects the nexus between Anti-Semitism and Extremism.

Note: Home Office nexus between Anti-Semitism and Extremism. Terror Laws limiting Freedom of Speech and applied to cases not related to terrorism?


Bob Blackman is the Member of Parliament for Harrow East. He has repeatedly spoken out against antisemitism in Parliament and tabled motions relating to antisemitism and the Holocaust. He is often sought out by the media to comment on antisemitism.


Both during his tenure as Archbishop of Canterbury and since, Lord Carey has spoken out firmly against antisemitism and worked tirelessly to strengthen bonds between Christians and Jews. Lord Carey led efforts to deepen the Church of England’s involvement in Holocaust commemoration, and has devoted many addresses to discussion of the lessons of the Holocaust. He is Honorary President of the International Council of Christians and Jews and in 2016 he delivered the Simon Wiesenthal Centre’s important Dorothy Gardner Adler State of Antisemitism Lecture.


Baroness Deech’s career has been one of distinguished public service. She has served as chair of the Bar Standards Board, Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education, Principal of St Anne’s College, Oxford, and chair of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. She has also been a Governor of the BBC, and the Gresham Professor of Law. Hers is a staunch voice against antisemitism in the House of Lords and she has taken a prominent stance in calling out antisemitism at universities.

Note: Mass Media - BBC


Mike Freer is the Member of Parliament for Finchley and Golders Green. He has repeatedly spoken out against antisemitism in Parliament and the media. He first worked with Campaign Against Antisemitism to prevent neo-Nazis from demonstrating against Jews in Golders Green.

Note: Determines who demonstrates and where?


Jonathan Goldberg is a formidable Queen’s Counsel whose career has included many landmark criminal trials, most recently securing the release of Marine Sergeant Alexander Blackman. He is a fierce opponent of antisemitism and has personally seen to it that an antisemitic barrister was disbarred. He is a staunch supporter of Campaign Against Antisemitism and led our first private prosecution, pro bono.

Note: Active both internally and externally with regards to the Crown Prosecution Service.


Fabian Hamilton is the Member of Parliament for Leeds North East. He is proudly Jewish and takes an uncompromising stance against antisemitism. He is currently the Shadow Minister for Peace and Disarmament working in the Defence and Foreign Office Teams.

Note: Proudly Jewish and presumably proud member of the Jeremy Corbyn's Shadow Cabinet. This appears to somewhat contradict a statement made by Lord Mitchell. Mr Hamilton is Jewish and presumably supports Jeremy Corbyn.

COLONEL RICHARD KEMP CBE Colonel Kemp served in the British Army from 1977 to 2006. He was commander of British forces in Afghanistan and completed fourteen operational tours of duty around the world, including in Iraq, the Balkans and Northern Ireland. His last years of service were spent in the Cabinet Office where he headed the international terrorism intelligence team and was chairman of the COBRA Intelligence Group. Having retired from the army, Colonel Kemp is now a writer whose expertise is frequently sought by national and international news media. He also consults companies on leadership, security, intelligence, counter-terrorism and defence and is a public speaker in each of these areas. Having taken a professional interest in extremism, Colonel Kemp recognised the links between extremism and antisemitism, and the threat that antisemitism therefore poses to society. He has been giving his time to campaigns to raise awareness about antisemitism since his retirement and is well known as a staunch friend of the Jewish people.

Note: British Armed Forces, British Intelligence, you can interpret 'well known as a staunch friend of the Jewish people' and its connotations when it comes to Defence and National Security.

BRIAN KENNELLY QC Brian Kennelly is an award-winning Queen’s Counsel who has argued cases at the Supreme Court and various international courts. Prior to taking silk he was on the Attorney General’s ‘A’ Panel of Counsel to the Crown. He is sought after for his expertise in public administrative law and regulatory law, including sanctions against extremist organisations. He is a staunch supporter of Campaign Against Antisemitism and led our first judicial review, pro bono, resulting in the quashing of a decision by the Crown Prosecution Service not to prosecute a neo-Nazi.

Note: Pressuring Home Office to prosecute individuals after cases were rejected by the Crown Prosecution Service?


Lord Mitchell has led a distinguished career in business and politics, during which he has always fought against antisemitism. For five years he chaired the Coexistence Trust, whose mission is to encourage dialogue between Muslim and Jewish students at British universities. As a prominent member of the Labour Party, he was highly critical of a report into antisemitism by Shami Chakrabarti which whitewashed severe and ongoing problems in the Party, and condemned her elevation to the peerage following the publication of the report (she remains the only peer ever nominated by Jeremy Corbyn). Upon Mr Corbyn’s re-election as leader of the Party, Lord Mitchell resigned from the Party on principle, telling a television audience that Mr Corbyn had failed to tackle antisemitism in the Party and had surrounded himself with people who are hostile to Jews.


Dr Offord is the Member of Parliament for Hendon. Since becoming an MP in 2010, he has campaigned against antisemitism, including by highlighting the permissive attitude of the authorities towards supporters of genocidal antisemitic terrorist organisation Hizballah.

NOTE: Notably an angle on issues not related to British internal affairs but more of an issue that affects merely Israel. Hizballah is not an anti-Semitic terrorist organisation but a Semitic organisation since those it represents are also Semites.


Sir Eric has devoted himself to fighting antisemitism throughout his political career. He has been instrumental in securing the widespread adoption of the International Definition of Antisemitism. He is the United Kingdom’s Special Envoy for post-Holocaust issues and has formerly served as the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. He was the Member of Parliament for Brentwood and Ongar for 25 years and used his last speech in the House prior to retiring to highlight the selection of disgraced former MP David Ward by the Liberal Democrats, resulting in Ward being sacked as a candidate within hours.

NOTE: Interesting angle in terms of intrusion of the Conservative Party into the internal affairs of another political party.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. When you witness certain cases brought to Crown Courts you see the implications and repercussions of certain associations. As Home Secretary during a Labour Administration, Jacqui Smith introduces a piece of legislation to combat Terrorism. From that point forwards, the temptation to use anti-Terror legislation in cases of Freedom of Speech has been irresistible. 

On March 7th 2017, The Guardian reports that "The Crown Prosecution Service is reconsidering whether to prosecute a far-right activist for alleged antisemitism on the eve of a highly unusual legal challenge to its decision to let the case drop. Government lawyers were due at the high court in London on Wednesday for judicial review proceedings brought by the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism."

What the previous paragraph shows is that Jewish Power active at 10 Downing Street twisted the arms of the Crown Prosecution Service to force the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute. 

The Guardian states: "The CPS originally examined the allegations against Bedford-Turner for five months, but decided in December 2015 a jury was unlikely to convict him of incitement to religious or racial hatred". 

The Crown Prosecution Service spent five months studying a case and decides not to prosecute. In March 2017, Jewish Power puts Crown Prosecution Service against the wall. Gideon Falter made a derogatory statement against the Crown Prosecution Service and the Police and said: "To get through the threshold of the police and then through the incompetent and arrogant attitude of the Crown Prosecution Service, it's practically impossible to get something prosecuted". 

When the Crown Prosecution Service and the Police acting within the limits of their attributions make a decision that does not satisfy Jewish Powers, Jewish Powers say that they don't please Jewish Powers because "they are incompetent and arrogant". This is an interesting interpretation of the role of those administering justice in the United Kingdom.

During a speech made in July 2015 in Whitehall, Jez Turner denounced the existence of the Shomrin that he refer to as an example of what he defined as disproportionate influence of Jewish organisations in the United Kingdom. Mr Turner said later on when the Crown Prosecution pressured by those Mr. Turner criticised had to prosecute. At a speech Mr. Turner made in 2017 he anticipated what would be the outcome of the prosecution. It is my view, taking into account the aforementioned, that Mr. Jeremy Bereford-Turner was crucified by those he criticised in a case that was not so much about Freedom of Speech, Racism or Anti-Semitism but about the dangers of challenging Jewish Power in the United Kingdom.

Mr Turner was sentenced to 12 months. Six of those months will be served in prison and the remaining six months will be served on licence (a form of conditional release with strings attached). Unwittingly, Jewish Powers in the United Kingdom have shown that Mr. Turner's assertions about 'disproportionate influence of Jewish organisations in the United Kingdom' are the truth, all the truth and nothing but the truth.

But there is a lot to be said about the fact that the case was only taken into consideration because of the pressure exerted by the Executive on the Judiciary. In a Democracy, there must be separation of powers (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary) and it is my view that the fundamental principle of separation of powers was violated and this creates a very dangerous precedent when the Executive acting on behalf of a private organisation with a very specific agenda of its own forces the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute.

And there is more. The Prosecution had the intention of using Anti-Terror Legislation against Mr. Turner and until the last minute made every effort to create yet another dangerous precedent by mixing legislation regarding Free Speech, Anti-Semitism and Terrorism.

If the separation of powers is violated, if legislation about Free Speech, Anti-Semitism and Terrorism is turned into one and the same thing, we are on a slippery slope towards a Totalitarian State.

Wednesday, 16 May 2018

Hope Not Hate confirms that British Judiciary is controlled by Zionists

Hope Not Hate confirms that we knew all along: Zionists control the British Justice System. To make matters worse, on the very same day that Jez Turner was convicted the Zionist Army slaughtered 60 unarmed Palestinians including babies and injured more than 2,700 of a crowd of unarmed demonstrators against Jewish occupation in Palestine.

Hope Not Hate states that "the conviction is another setback for the group (London Forum)" but this is contradicted by views expressed by represented of many other nationalist groups that clearly stated that the conviction of Jez Turner is a unifying force for nationalist groups across Britain as this shows even the most moderate members of the Nationalist Movement that opposing Zionism in all its forms is an over-riding priority and objective.
Gideon Falter CAA

By his own admission, Gideon Falter - one of the heads of CAA (and reportedly linked to CIA), stated that he works very closely with 10 Downing Street and this could lead to major issues indicating that the separation of powers (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary) has been violated leading to the conclusion that Zionists used their influence at 10 Downing Street to pressure the Crown Prosecution Service that had initially disregarded accusations made against Jez Turner.

But there are other issues that are not less important and as crucial as the fact that Jews control mainstream political parties, influence mass media and put pressure on the Judiciary. A group called National Action that was recently banned is extremely active with participation of former and present members of the British Armed Forces that organised training camps for paramilitaries in various regions of the United Kingdom. Members of the British Armed Forces could decide to target Jewish interests directly. This is extremely serious and is being totally disregarded by British Authorities.

As we learn from incidents happening in Germany, Muslim immigrants are now turning against Jews and Jewish authorities in Germany have advised Jewish people not to wear any garments including skullcaps that could give away their Jewish identity. Rising anti-Jewish feelings is now one of the main concerns in Germany. As Zionists murderous activities in Palestine shock the world and send shock-waves across Europe, it is not unthinkable that Muslim operators could become increasingly aggressive against Jewish people in the United Kingdom and that the actions of Israel could be a unifying factor for several strands within Muslim communities in the United Kingdom.

Members of Jewish Communities are becoming increasingly concerned about the consequences of the actions of the government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likud Party and the potential consequences for Jews across the world.

Monday, 14 May 2018

As a man gets convicted for speaking his mind, Israel kills 52 and injures more than a thousand

A Jewish woman firmly stated that the conviction of a British veteran in London for speaking his mind about the Shomrin and Jewish Power in the United Kingdom bears no relationship to Israeli policies. Well, today 52 Palestinian protesters were slaughtered by Jews in Jerusalem and more than a thousand Palestinians were injured. The difference? Jews are armed and the protesters were unarmed and protesting against 70 years of occupation. A bit of a difference, you might think.

What about the Geneva Convention? Does Israel recognize the Geneva Convention? What about UN rules about occupying forces? Do they apply? Those who protest about Jewish Power in the United Kingdom haven't killed anybody nor plan to kill anybody. They are simply making a very valid point. What about Jewish forces in Palestine? The list of victims of occupation is much too long to mention and this includes carpet bombing in Gaza where ten of thousands of homes were destroyed and the list of fatal casualties and of those injured and disabled includes thousands of men, women and children.

Prime Minister Theresa May advises caution and restraint. This is the same Prime Minister who sent an envoy to Israel to visit occupied lands and have secret talks with the Israeli government and did it with such speed that the Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson was not told about it. Caution and restraint? Occupation, torture and assassinations of millions of people forced to live under a Racist Theological Totalitarian Regime for which the non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine are seen as Untermenschen and I deliberately choose the word Untermenschen for its historical connotations.

Many Jews complained about the fact that Western governments knew about persecution in Europe and did nothing to help those being persecuted. Well, Palestinians are the Jews of the 1930s and 1940s. They are being killed and all the UN and Western governments do for them is to ask for 'caution and restraint'.

Israel seems to be above the Geneva Convention, above all treaties on Human Rights and actions of occupying forces, above the Organisation of the United Nations itself and, if this was not enough, those criticizing Israeli aggression and violations risk being sent to jail falsely labeled as Anti-Semites.

Anger is rising and it goes beyond the confines of Israel. The rise of the Far Right is a direct consequence of the crimes committed by Jews in Palestine. This is made worse by the fact that great masses of immigrants coming to Europe from Muslim countries do hate Jews and this has led to rising anti-Jewish feelings in places like Germany - country where Jewish authorities have advised Jewish people not to wear symbols or attires that can make them a target.

Anti-Jewish feelings are directly linked to Israel because Jews are inseparable part of the State of Israel and therefore - like it or not - every Jew living outside Israel will also be targeted in spite of the fact that many Jews reject Likud policies. The crucial difference is that Israel exists behind barriers. There are no barriers in Europe and elsewhere. The time-tomb for another wave of persecution against Jews in Europe is ticking and time is running out as demographic changes bring with them new threats.

The children of Islam are de-facto adults of fighting age and their numbers are rising across Europe.

Friday, 11 May 2018

Shomrin: Policing organisations set up along racial or religious lines?

Only one community in what we know as Multicultural Britain has been allowed to create what is a de-facto Policing organisation and it is called Shomrin. Whether it is made up almost or entirely by members of the Jewish Community is not the issue. The issue is that no other community would be allowed to have such an organisation that works alongside regular Police forces in the United Kingdom. Would a Muslim Policing organisation, or a Sikh Police organisation or an African Policing organisation be allowed to exist in the United Kingdom? The answer is No. Why then public resources in area of such sensitivity as policing are being invested allowing the Shomrin to exist?

Much has been said about the existence of Sharia Law Courts in the United Kingdom, something that in my personal opinion is not just irregular but also dangerous. We already have a legal system that involves all citizens living in the United Kingdom regardless of race, religion, gender or any other defining characteristic. One law for all. On this basis, having a parallel Police service run primarily and predominantly by members of the Jewish Community is a dangerous anomaly.We don't have a Muslim Police Service or a Black Police Service. The British Police Force has elements that belong to all communities working together.

I find this reality of Britain to be most extraordinary and undesirable. In a country that works on the basis of precedent, the Muslim Community or any other community in the United Kingdom would be duly entitled to have their own Police Force by saying that 'well, if they can have it, we should have it'. 

We do need to have a very serious conversation about this kind of issues. There should be one Police Service for all and one Law for all without discrimination. The very existence of the Shomrin has created a very dangerous precedent.  

Paul Golding: Draconian release conditions imposed by British Police

The release conditions imposed by British Police against Paul Golding, Britain First Leader, are draconian to say the least. Much needs to be known about how Jayda Fransen has been treated. I have to confess that this is the first time I see such conditions imposed in Britain and they are more severe than the conditions for release imposed by Military Dictatorships in Latin America. After all, in Latin America, when you were released you were a free man without limitations. Not so in Britain, where Police Authorities have become Political Police.