Tuesday, 28 November 2017

Katie Hopkins: In a world for which alternative points of view are anathema

Katie Hopkins: As refreshing as troubling

The more the mass media and certain political operators appear to dislike Katie Hopkins the more I like her. There is something absolutely refreshing about the way she talks and challenges mountains of political correctness erected to stop people from saying what they really feel about the issues of the day.

Her very genuine style has come at a huge cost both financially and from a personal point of view but she keeps forging ahead taking things on the chin and moving forward. When she left LBC, LBC became all the poorer. I must say that I have practically stopped listening to LBC since she is no longer before the microphones of a broadcaster for which political correctness is the raison d'être. One wonders how far will people like Nigel Farage go before they are pushed out.

Her personal life has been fraught with difficulties from a very early age. She has had to struggle with very serious health issues from the very beginning but what would have been insurmountable obstacles have turned her into a formidable fighter. Her approach to life has been 'What do you want? Let's have it. Are you trying to pick up a fight with me? Show me what you have got."

Not even the Sun or the Daily Mail could handle the heat that she brings into everything she does. They cannot cope with the real McCoy. Whether you agree or disagree with what she says, she makes life interesting and worth living.

Monday, 27 November 2017

Jez Turner: Who pulls the strings of some members of the British government

Who pull the strings of some members of the British government and uses British Courts to promote its own agenda?

Jez Turner is being targeted for a case that was dismissed by the Crown Prosecution Service and reinstated by the very same Crown Prosecution Service because of pressure exerted by a lobby on very visible figures of the British government.

Tuesday, 21 November 2017

National Action: Over-generalisation leading to gross injustices

National Action: Over-generalisation leading to gross injustices

Whether National Action has been banned or proscribed for whatever reasons that the British government hasn't fully justified with facts, we need to focus on the rights of individuals and on how those rights are being eroded.

We have seen demonstrations carried out by Islamic organisations in the United Kingdom that have publicly and very loudly talked saying that their fundamental aim is the destruction of the British Way of Life. They have not only burnt Poppies or insulted British Soldiers that were returning from the battlefields. They have actually engaged in the promotion of terrorism against Britain.

I don't see National Action doing anything of the sort. They are not going around detonating bombs in Manchester and London. They are not driving vehicles and killing people on the streets. They are not going around chasing girls and boys to rape them or to ply them with alcohol and drugs as some Muslim groups in the United Kingdom have done.

The British Government is using Anti-Terror Legislation to persecute people who are not involved in acts of terrorism and the definition of what constitutes Terrorism and what doesn't constitute Terrorism is open to abuse by British Authorities.

I happen to personally know individuals who are now facing the courts falsely accused of being involved in acts of terrorism. I did know Paul Hickman who took his own life facing the threat of a  court using kangaroo charges that are a total fabrication. I happen to personally know Jack Renshaw and Jack Renshaw is not the kind of person that would possible be what the British Authorities seem to believe that he is.

This issue affects me personally because I strongly believe that these injustices are being committed on the name of Political Correctness going mad.

I have personally written to the Home Office Secretary Amber Rudd MP, as I have written to Helen Hayes MP, Jo Swinson MP, and to the Head of the North East Counter Terrorism Unit, alerting them that extremely serious injustices are being committed and all for the sake of Political Correctness.

Whether any of the aforementioned British Authorities wants to take any notice of what I have said remains to be seen but the point has to be made.

Sunday, 19 November 2017

Snap Election in Germany?

German coalition talks in tatters as FDP walked away from negotiations

Angela Merkel who barely got 26% of the vote in the recent German elections was desperately trying to form a coalition with FDP and the Greens. Immigration and Energy Policies were her undoing. With the Social Democracts in no mood to be members of any coalition, Germany would be heading for yet another Federal Election.

Immigration is a contentious issue in Germany linked to National Security and Public Security and Angela Merkel has made a gigantic mess that led to Alternative für Deutschland entering the Bundestag with 90 seats.

But in reality, the Greens are the ones to blame by calling for a reduction in coal-generated power that could lead to job losses in the energy and manufacturing sector and by campaigning to keep the immigration floodgates open.

Will I receive another letter from Peter Tauber? Most probably not. The German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier could soon have to dissolve the current parliament to have new elections.

During the coalition talks the CDU and the CSU talked about immigration restrictions. I hope Austria, Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic take note of this and especially when EU under Angela Merkel's command took them to court trying to force them to accept more immigrants.

Adolf Hitler during his last years in Argentina and other relevant facts

Adolf Hitler
Adolf Hitler during his last years in Argentina

The supposed death of Adolf Hitler in a bunker in Berlin has been part of the myths created by propaganda. A receding hairline, no moustache and the appearance of a peaceful retiree are very much in tune with what really happened.

Many Germans went to Latin America in search of a new life before, during and after World War Two.

Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia and Chile were some of the chosen destinations - especially countries that had important populations of German expatriates.

The "Official Truth" is somewhat different of what actually occurred. Many biographies of important former members of Das Dritte Reich apparatus were rewritten. Nationalities changed to divert public attention. Some Germans became Italian because it was well known that countries like Uruguay and Argentina had numerous immigrants of Italian descent.

Rolf Mengele meeting his father Josef Mengele in Brazil

It was no secret that Britain and the USA had no interest in chasing Adolf Hitler and Josef Mengele. Their presence in Latin America was well known but it was something it was not convenient to talk about.

There were areas in certain Latin America countries were access was strictly controlled. Uruguay was a very safe place. Josef Mengele got married in Colonia, Uruguay, using his real name.

This is the official announcement of Josef Mengele's wedding in Nueva Helvecia, Colonia, Uruguay on July 17 1958. Many Germans kept their real names and others chose to disguise themselves as Italians or people of other nationalities depending on which passports they had when they arrived in Latin America.

A few days ago, I received an email from Peter Tauber, General Secretary of CDU - the party headed by German Chancellor Angela Merkel telling me that I could register to vote in German Elections. After being in England for almost 30 years and being a British Citizen and with full knowledge of what happens in Germany to those who dare to challenge the Official Version of History, I must say that I am quite comfortable living in Britain.

If you are young and inquisitive, you are not good news for those who want to maintain the lies and fabrications that have been used to exert mind control making a lot of people feel guilty for something that did not actually happen.

If you are a brilliant scientist that happens to be working at the Max Planck Institute and about to get a PhD at the University of Stuttgart and you find out that the talk about the use of chemical substances in concentration camps is not based on factual data, you are not going to be able to live in Germany, let alone work or study in Germany.

This is the history of Germar Rudolf. Born in Limburg an der Lahn, Hesse. In 1990, he joined the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research at Stuttgart, where he prepare a PhD thesis.

In 1991, Rudolf began work on a paper entitled Report on the Formation and Verifiability of Cyanide Compounds in the Auschwitz "gas chambers" on behalf of the Düsseldorf attorney Hajo Hermann, a former Luftwaffe pilot. When his work was published in 1993, Rudolf was told not to enter the Max Planck Institute, his employment was terminated without notice. In 1996, the University of Stuttgart asked Rudolf to withdraw his application for a final PhD examination.

In 1995, Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months in prison for 'inciting racial hatred' by the disctrict court of Stuttgart because of the "Rudolf Report". In August 2004, a district court of Manheim tried to take over his bank accounts. Rudolf avoided going to jail by fleeing to Spain, England and finally to the United States from where he was extradited back to Germany in 2005 and sent to a prison in Rottenburg and from there to another prison in Stuttgart in Baden-Württenberg. On March 15, 2007, the Manheim Disctrict Court sentenced him to two years and six months in prison and finally released on July 5, 2009. Rudolf left Germany and now lives in the USA.

All this happened because a scientist published his work contradicting the Official Version of events. No, we are not talking about North Korea. We are talking about Germany.

Political Persecution in the United Kingdom

Jayda Franzen
Political Persecution in the United Kingdom

Whether you agree or disagree with somebody on political grounds, you need to be able to discern that the only guarantee for all is the fact that people of different persuasions can express their views freely without fear of persecution. Unfortunately, in the United Kingdom, Freedom of Speech is just words. There is no Freedom of Speech.

Police Forces in the United Kingdom are actively engaged in Political Persecution. Things are going in the wrong direction and Political Persecution is already costing human lives. Paul Hickman took his own life when facing an unfair trial after he was was arrested for distributing campaign material. Jack Renshaw is facing the courts and it is due to appear on January 2nd, 2018 to learn about his fate after he was arrested because legislation meant to be used against Terrorism is being used for political purposes.

When I have many reasons to worry about what is happening in Germany it seems that Britain is fast advancing towards becoming a Totalitarian State.

Jayda Franzen was arrested in Bromley, South London, and taken by air to Belfast, Northern Ireland, to face interrogation because she made a speech against Terrorism in Northern Ireland.

The concern is that as Democratic individuals are persecuted this will lead to youngsters joining other organisations that will engage in direct action against the Political Establishment and more cases like the case of Jo Cox MP will follow. When more and more people no longer feel that they live in a Democratic State, the potential for violence is enormous. The direct consequence of Political Persecution and Repression will be Direct Violence targeting specific individuals. To the contrary, the more freedom there is to express views without fear of persecution, the safer we can be.

Monday, 13 November 2017

The irony is that Jews have immortalised Adolf Hitler

The irony of remembering what happened during World War Two is that Jews have immortalised Hitler by constantly going back to World War Two. It has been a doubled edged-sword. More than 70 years after the demise of Adolf Hitler, the name of the German President Chancellor is a household name.

I reckon that 70 years after the conflict, the world itself has not come to terms or being able to internalise the importance of the conflict. For many, the conflict has become a touristic attraction in a way that tragedies and those involved in them became a curiosity.

A museum in Indonesia even built an exhibit of Adolf Hitler with a photograph depicting the entrance of a concentration camp with the famous words 'Arbeit macht Frei' (Work makes you free). The protagonists of World War Two and the symbols of World War Two have been turned into cultural icons. Members of the British Royal Household and Members of Parliament have been shown entertaining themselves wearing National Socialist armbands.

It is a very peculiar turn of events because the more Jewish communities and Jewish organisations keep World War Two in the minds of present generations, the more glamour is added to the experiences of World War Two. The more they talk about it, the more fashionable certain symbols become. Anti-Semitism can be therefore be self-inflicted.

Friday, 10 November 2017

UK Anti-Terror Legislation is being used for Political Persecution

Anthony Mole - Head of North West Counter Terrorism Unit
UK Anti-Terror Legislation is used for Political Persecution

When Anti-Terror Legislation was passed in the House of Commons after being put forward by then Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, there were voices of concern talking about the possibility that Anti-Terror Legislation could be used for purposes that had nothing to do with fighting against Terrorism and what was feared has become reality. A para-political organisation called National Action was banned after being wrongly classified as a Terrorist Organisation, innocent people were arrested and are now being taken to court to be jailed because of their political ideas. But there are other aspects of this tragedy that are unfolding when children are taken away from their families and innocent people take their own lives. This was the case of Paul Hickman who was arrested because he was in possession of stickers used for political purposes. Paul Hickman couldn't bear the thought of being put on trial to be crucified on trumped up charges and of having to spend time in jail as yet another victim of political persecution.

Paul Hickman

I wrote to Anthony Mole as Head of the North West Counter Terrorism Unit; I wrote to Amber Rudd MP as Home Secretary; I wrote to Helen Hayes MP whom I approached several times to deal with political issues; I wrote to Jo Swimson MP, Deputy Leader of the Liberal Democrats. I write to you as ordinary members of the public and ask you to spread the word because this is a very serious matter. 

I lived under a military dictatorship and I can recognise the signs of a dictatorial regime being imposed on the British people. It happens gradually, so gradually that most people fail to stop such signs. Firstly, basic rights of assembly are taken away. People are not allowed to demonstrate in certain public areas. The justification is 'we are concerned about public safety'. Secondly, measures that are nothing more than political discrimination are implemented. "Sorry, you cannot have the job that you want 'because you are a member or have been a member of certain political parties'." "Sorry, you cannot be invited to a debate because you are a member or have been a member of certain political parties or because we don't like what you say". This goes so far as not just banning ordinary people but also US Presidents like President Donald Trump. No official visits to the United Kingdom and no speaking at the House of Commons. 

Now, families are persecuted, children are taken away from their families, organisations that have committed no crime are banned and individuals are persecuted and imprisoned. Britain is becoming a de-facto dictatorial regime.

When the masses support dictatorial behaviour all that is left to say is what Jesus said on the cross: Forgive them father, for they don't know what they are doing. Millions of people across Britain are voluntarily and willingly walking towards a repressive regime. 

Dear Jo Swinsom MP,

This is the original email I sent to Amber Rudd, to Helen Hayes and to the Head of the North West Counter Terrorism Unit. It is a very important matter and in the last 24 hours became a case of life and death leading a 37 year old to take his own life. You can contact me directly. I do include a mobile number and I am ready and willing to meet you at the House of Commons to talk about a very important issue.

Anti-Terror Legislation was introduced under a Labour government. Since then, it has been used for purposes that were not originally intended.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen
The World of Politics / Politische Welt/ Мир политики

From: K G Hohenstauffen [mailto:kghohenstauffen@btconnect.com]
Sent: 09 November 2017 14:38
To: 'amber.rudd.mp@parliament.uk' <amber.rudd.mp@parliament.uk>
Cc: 'Helen Hayes' <helen.hayes.mp@parliament.uk>; 'tacsamltd@gmail.com' <tacsamltd@gmail.com>
Subject: Something very wrong

Dear Amber Rudd,

There is something absolutely wrong concerning the strategy adopted against para-political organizations (not Terrorist organizations). National Action is not a Terrorist organization despite the fact that it has been wrongly classified as a Terrorist organization.

I personally knew Paul Hickman and distributing adhesive campaign propaganda materials is not a terrorist activity. Somebody like Paul Hickman was never involved in any kind of violent activity whatsoever and neither was Jack Renshaw due to appear in court on January 2nd  2018.

When anti-Terror Laws are used for purely political purposes there is the certain danger of a backlash that could lead to others getting involved in activities that otherwise they would not get involved into and this because of the anger that injustices generate.

I know what happened in Uruguay, Argentina and Chile – among other countries - in the 1970s and 1980s. I was a member of the military in those days and of the mass media/intelligence services that led to the arrest, torture and in some cases execution of political detainees and I worry that Britain is walking along a very dangerous path when Anti-Terror Laws are used for purely political purposes.

The present approach can certainly create a danger that didn’t exist before. I sense the resentment and anger that such approach has created, approach that could turn political activists into murderers.

Your approach will not prevent attacks against Members of Parliament. Helen Hayes, that I know personally, is aware of the fact that I do know the subject matter that I am writing about because of my background and my political links.

Common sense and rationality must prevail. The actions in which the North West Counter Terrorism Unit has been involved are not related to Terrorism. They are actions of a political nature and they are totally unjustified.

I hope for Britain’s sake that there is a change of course of action. Anti-Terror Laws should only be used for the purpose they were intended to be used. I hope that Britain stops using Anti-Terror Laws for purely political purposes.

And I take this opportunity to issue a word of caution. It is common knowledge that members of the British Armed Forces have joined or are joining para-political groups. Nothing happens in the military without the knowledge of the higher ranks of the British Armed Forces. It is not the kind of thing that can be kept a secret. If you were to touch a raw nerve, the present approach could be even more catastrophic.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen

Wednesday, 8 November 2017

Jack Renshaw: Justice system gone mad

Jack Renshaw: Justice system gone mad

Jack Renshaw used to be a member of the youth branch of the British National Party and made speeches at the age of 15 at party meeting including a National Conference.

Now, he is in detention in Manchester because some time ago during a speech made at the age of 22, years after he left the BNP youth movement, he allegedly made derogatory comments about Jews.

Jack Renshaw was arrested by the North West Counter Terrorism Unit headed by Detective Chief Superintendent Tony Mole.

Jack Renshaw a target of the North West Counter Terrorism Unit? Jack Renshaw seen as terror threat? It is obviously a joke and a joke that is costing thousands of Pounds of taxpayers money. I wrote to the head of the North West Counter Terrorism Unit and also to the Jewish Group because this is utter nonsense that show how inadequate the services that are supposed to protect from terrorism actually are. If they had done real a real background search on Jack Renshaw they would have discovered who Jack Renshaw actually. If we went to send to Court every single person who has something native to say about Jews, half of the country would have to be sent to Court and ultimately jailed.

Mass hysteria is spreading like wildfire. Look at the headlines regarding the Labour Party, for example. Reading such rising amount of rubbish one would be led to believe that suddenly all Labour Party supporters would suddenly become storm troopers of Das Dritte Reich. Some people like Jews and other people don't like Jews. Get on with it. When a crook like Bernard Madoff goes around ripping off both Jews and non Jews and ends up in jail or a movie mogul like Harvey Weinstein stand accused of molestation, harassment and rape, both Jews and non Jews are angry.

Criticism is not a crime. It is a democratic right to criticise what we do not like without being taken to court for exercising our democratic rights. The legal system is crossing red lines and compromising our democratic freedoms.

North West Counter Terrorism Unit - Manchester

Dear Anthony George Mole,

I met Jack Renshaw, the 22 year-old that stands accused of making derogatory comments about Jews. The fact that he is being portrayed as a dangerous individual beggars belief and shows very little understanding about who Jack Renshaw actually is.

When I met him he would be about 15 years of age posing as a British Patriot and making emotive speeches about Britain, with very little life experience and very little or no political experience whatsoever. He was the typical young boy seeking attention and trying to be the centre of attention for the sake of self-importance.

There are many thousands like him that are much more of a danger to themselves than they could possibly be a danger to anybody else. You should also be aware of the mentality of the people you are dealing with. By sending an immature individual to jail, you are going to be making a very serious mistake. You are going to turn him into a hero.

Jewish publications are talking about him. The UAF is talking about him. Suddenly, from being totally anonymous, you are going to turn him into a celebrity, into somebody who was persecuted “for the cause”. This is the worst way of dealing with individuals like Jack Renshaw. You will be promoting his narrative and the narrative of thousands like him. From University drop-out, to “fighter for the cause”. As I refer to the Jewish Group, he is going to be surrounded by people who are the real danger and that will most probably nurture him as British prisons become centres for political indoctrination and terrorism training hotspots.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen
The World of Politics / Politische Welt/ Мир политики

From: K G Hohenstauffen [mailto:kghohenstauffen@btconnect.com]
Sent: 06 November 2017 23:38
To: 'editorial@thejngroup.com' <editorial@thejngroup.com>; 'newsdesk@thejngroup.com' <newsdesk@thejngroup.com>
Subject: Jack Renshaw
Importance: High

Dear Sir/Madam,

Who is Jack Renshaw? An immature 22-year-old looking for attention and saying silly things that ultimately got him into trouble. I met him about 5 years ago. By then he was presented as an enthusiastic and old-fired up British Nationalist with no political experience whatsoever. He read high-school style speeches full of patriotic fervour but with very little substance and waited for the applause of the audience, not understanding that many of those who made up the audience were people of little consequence, limited education and limited brainpower. He went on to join National Action – a group of very disturbed and disturbing individuals, also of little consequence, of limited education and limited brainpower who he defined as a more radical group because he wanted to be ‘a man of action’. Being a man of action meant for him to talk rubbish, the kind of rubbish he couldn’t possibly talk about as a member of a political party – any political party. Jack Renshaw is not a dangerous individual. If anything, he is merely a danger to himself.

He is already in detention and there is the probability that on January 2nd, 2018 he will be sent to jail for a very long time. What would be achieved? There are many Jack Renshaw, teenagers that at one point or another lose their bearings and go around seeking attention, getting involved with the wrong kind of people. Because he will be judged for having made Anti-Jewish comments and he is going to be surrounded by Muslim Extremists who are also Anti-Jewish, he is going to spend time with people who are truly dangerous and have the means to commit atrocities. He is going to be trained, nurtured to become a real extremist, because British Prisons are training centres for Islamic Fundamentalists.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen
The World of Politics / Politische Welt/ Мир политики