UK Money Laundering networks- More than a billion Pound via small shops in UK

 

More than a billion Pound money laundering scheme using Vape shops, hairdresser shops, barber shops, and a wide range of small firms like corner shops. 

Given the costs of running a company in the United Kingdom, I have always wondered how many so called small shops manage to survive given operational costs that would not be justified given the revenues that the said companies can get. Remarkably many would be making losses every single day. Now, researchers seem to have found that the said companies that on average remain open for up to 6 months have unsuspected sources of income.

The six months cycle allows those using the said companies for money laundering to move under the radar, before the state has had the time to have a look at what is actually going on. More than a billion Pound is a sizeable number, monies that could be used by drug Cartels and other criminal organizations, including terrorist networks. British borders are not just porous. They are wide open. You could pay and maintain a small army with that amount of money, an army that could demolish Britain from within.

Britain is a Paradise for those wanting to acquire all kinds of weaponry. It is not a matter of lack of supply. If you have got buying power, you will certainly be a very satisfied customer, able to bring down Britain to its knees. While politicians are used to focus on geopolitics and external enemies, something is going on inside Britain. The number of illegal migrants coming from certain countries are mainly males of fighting age, combined with a vast supply of resources, including weaponry, is the stuff nightmares are made of. 

Governments in Britain are more interested in protecting "the rights of illegal migrants" than in making sure that Britain is not destroyed from within.  Such levels of carelessness indicate how corrupt and how inept UK politicians have become. 

Bewahren was wir Lieben - Preserve what we love: the dangerous side of mass migration

This is Britain

Bewahren was wir Lieben

Preserve what we love

Across continents similar issues are being raised. In South Africa, a black majority country, people are up in arms protesting about migration and especially about illegal migration.

Migration is mostly about numbers as Switzerland calls a Referendum to limit Swiss population to 10 million. When this article is being written, we still do not know the outcome of the Referendum.

The image comes from Northern Ireland, but the problematic is affecting both the Republic of Ireland in the south. Apparently, Northern Ireland is a bridge that allows mass migration into the Republic of Ireland. 

We must remember that a country is the people who live in that country. If we change the people, we change the country and sooner than later the countries as we know them today cease to exist. Demographics does matter and the imbalances created by uncontrolled migration leading to no integration whatsoever is bound to lead to resistance and violence.

British Indians themselves have understood the dangers of mass migration and are supporting Reform. Migrants who have fully integrated into the United Kingdom want to preserve Britain (Bewahren was wir Lieben).

Not long ago a British World War Two veteran said loudly and clearly that if he had known what Britain was going to become he would not have fought against Germany.

Basically, he said that todays Britain is not the country he and his mates fought and died for, a feeling that is shared by many across the world.

It is not about opposing change. It is about preserving what they love and this very much includes the values that they fought for, values that in Britain are being systematically undermined by one government after another.

The same politicians that promote the use of Ukrainian flags on British land oppose the use of British flags on British land and demonise those who dare to use British flags on British land.

UK: Immigration vs Non Immigration

 

Immigration vs Non Immigration

When it comes to immigration, we must remember that a country is basically the people living in the country.

We must then decide what kind of country we want to live in. What kind of values do we want? What makes us feel safe or unsafe? What allows us to have a future and what does not allow us to have a future. People have preferences. Some communities prefer to live among those they see as their own. This is particularly visible in many parts of Britain. Certain cities and certain parts of those cities tell you the full story. People want to live with people who look like them, behave like them, have similar values and even people who speak the same language that they speak. 

This is why we find everywhere conglomerates of people of the same race, same religion and same language. You can choose certain neighbourhoods only to find out that practically the entirety of the said neighbourhoods are inhabited by people who come to Britain from certain countries. For many of those living in the said areas the main language is not English. You can find people who have been born and bred in Britain that do not speak the national language or have a very poor command of the national language. Across Britain you can find what we could, without a shadow of a doubt, call ghettos. And this is clear example of a total failure to integrate with the rest of society.

There is class divide, racial divide, religious divide and social and cultural divide and this is not an example of a healthy country. There is a point when so called Diversity is Apartheid.

We can encounter people who have lived in Britain practically their entire lives and cannot have a conversation in the language of the country, people who need to have an interpreter to use public services. Without the most basic communication tools, they will be forever limited, because in real terms they have never lived in Britain.

The issue about managing immigration is to ensure that all newcomers do not live in close communities that are de facto ghettos. 

UK: the most important issue by far is immigration and this is Reform vs Conservative

 

The biggest issue by far in UK politics is immigration

This is a contest between the Reform Party and the Conservative Party

Non since 1997 had the Conservative Party suffered such a catastrophic series of electoral defeats in the United Kingdom. In July 2024, the unthinkable happened and the Labour Party cruised to power after 14 years of a Conservative Party Administration (or should be talk about several Conservative Governments). The fact is that the infighting within the Conservative Party led to several leadership contests and coming and goings in terms of economic policies. Voters lost confidence on a visibly confused and divided Conservative Party to the point that in the last leadership election the new leader was not chosen by a majority of members of the Conservative Party, but merely by Members of Parliament.

The outcome of 2024 was a complete disaster for the Conservative Party that saw its representation in the House of Commons reduced to a few more than a 100 Members of Parliament. The situation did not improve after a series of by-elections caused by personal scandals. This years the Conservative Party was campaigned to maintain control of not less than 16 local authorities. It lost them all.

Internal problems in the Conservative Party have not gone away. In fact, they are exacerbated by the fact that high profile Conservative MPs distance themselves from what is now the main core of what is left of the Conservative Party. Big vote winners of the Conserevative Party have fallen into disrepute. There is no unity and there is still the same level of confusion, aggravated by the fact that many of the issues they are now talking about are issues that they should have dealt with during 14 years of a Conservative Party administration.

So, when it comes to confronting the Reforma Party the question arises. "Why you did not do before what you now tell us that you want to do now? "It is a disarming question. The Conservative Party had a majority in Parliament and did not do what it now promises that it will do when it is stuck in Opposition.

A Conservative Party in Opposition cannot deliver any promises. Therefore many Conservative voters are now supporting the Reform Party and there is confusion about what the Reform Party stands for. Many voters do not have the time nor the inclination to focus on several issues at the same time. They now choose to focus their attention on one particular issue: Immigration. Immigration includes both illegal migration and legal migration. People care about illegal migration precisely because it is illegal and people care about legal migration because legal migration levels are much too high. 

Even the leader of the Labour Party that has always been in favour of mass migration made a statement declaring that new legislation was on the way to curb legal migration.

The more the Conservative Party attacks the Reform Party the more voters feel inclined to support the Reform Party. Why? Because in the Reform Party there is clarity of purpose about an issue most people care about. At this point in time, in certain areas, the Reform Party is winning against both Labour and Conservative. In other areas, the Labour Party has to fear the advances of the Green Party. If the Green Party manages to replace Labour in many areas and if the retreating Conservatives turn out to support the Reform Party then the chances of success of the Reform Party are vastly improved.

Next year, once again, there are local elections and all 32 local authorities in Greater London will be contested. Whatever the Labour government has done since July 2024 and whatever the Labour government will do until May 2026 will have an impact. Unfulfilled promises and discontent about policies implemented will play a very important role at local level. It could be said that the Greater London Elections will be the starting point of the campaign for the 2028 London Assembly Elections and soon after that there is going to be another General Election in 2029. There is an electoral progression that, for the moment, does not favour Labour or Conservative. The Reform Party and the Green Party stand to benefit at every level. 

Since the Liberal Party - now known as Liberal Democratic Party - was relegated to third place, there has never been anything so trascendental in British Politics. The Conservative Party has reigned supreme during most of the history of Parliamentary Democracy in the United Kingdom. The thought that the Conservative Party could be relegated to third or fourth place in the first quarter of the Twenty-First Century speaks volumes about the political challenges Britain is facing.

Britain: What happens after the General Election? The package of promises falls apart when confronted with reality.

 

A few days ago came the news that life for 4 million people in the UK will turn into a nightmare if they don´t manage to regularize their visas turning paper visas into digital visas. 4 million people? How much can the state apparatus do from now until 31 December 2024? 

How many people are needed to locate and process 4 millon visas in such a short period? But this is a minute dot in terms of things that will need to be done. Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves has formally committed a new Labour government to increase salaries across the entire public sector and Unions are already on a war footing to keep the now Shadow Chacellor of the Exchequer accountable.

The promise about getting rid of Zero Hour Contracts might erode even more public services in an attempt to improve working conditions in the UK and the effect in the private sector must not be underestimated. Faced with the prospect of having to issue regular contracts with all legal requirements, both the public sector and the private sector will struggle.

Grant Shapps as Defence Secretary has been struggling to explain where he is going to find more than 70 billion Pound to beef up the Armed Forces. The same questions will be asked to a new Defense Secretary since Grant Shapps has publicly acknowledged that he believes that the Conservative Party will lose the General Election.

The clock is ticking and many of the faces we see today as symbols of power and decision making will vanish and probably soon to be forgotten. Should announcements made about critical issues be postponed until we know who is going to be in command? Whatever the present authorities say today could be absolutely irrelevant in a few days time. It is a tradition that a new Parliament is not bound to follow what the outgoing Parliament decides.

With a new Parliament, today´s points of reference will vanish. There will be a new political reality. Rachel Reeves has already announced that there will be a new relationship with the European Union. Does this mean the end of Brexit? Reform´s campaign might have a lot to do not with destroying the Conservative Party but with assurances regarding the present relationship with the European Union. the irony is that freedom from any budgetary restrictions gives Britain the necessary flexibility to increase public deficits. We known what happened with the ERM, precursor of the EURO. Will a government headed by Keir Starmer want to fall into the same trap John Major and his government were in before finally deciding to step out of the ERM? What did Tony Blair and Gordon Brown avoid joining the EURO? Precisely because of what happened with the ERM?  

  

Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt not standing as MP in 2024?

 

The political life of an administration is directly linked to two people: The Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

The role played by Jeremy Hunt in the Conservative administration is a major role. We are a few months away of a crucial General Election and the role of the Chancellor of the Exchequer as main actor when it comes to implement economic policy can make or break a government long before a General Election. When Jeremy Hunt indicates that he might leave the Cabinet even before the General Election and/or that he will not be standing as Member of Parliament in 2024 sends shockwaves. He is basically cutting the branch of the tree on which British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is standing. Jeremy Hunt's calculations about not wanting to end his career with an electoral defeat show how little he trusts his own position and most importantly shows that he does not believe that there is going to be a Conservative government after the General Election. This is devastating. 

It must be said that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has of recent spent a lot of time trying to fix the rest of the world and paying little attention to what is happening in Britain. Money is flocking away from Britain and when it came to a major project the word 'cancellation' was supposed to be countered with veiled announcement about hypothetical transport projects that have not even been considered. The Prime Minister cancelled a project that was already underway and all the work done at a cost of billions of Pound is therefore abandoned. All the monies already invested and all the jobs that were generated are going to be thrown into the bin to be classified as yet more waste. We tried to sweeten the pill by promising a Paradise made up of new transport projects that he knows that he will not be able to deliver because he might not be able to stay as Prime Minister beyond the next General Election. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak put an end to something real and promised thin air in exchange.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has disarmed Britain by sending abroad equipment and resources that cannot be easily replaced. For many years, the British Armed Forces have been disadvantaged and even when it came to pay in the public budget the British Armed Force came last. On the one hand, you see speeches full of aggressive language and on the other hand you see the realities of the British Armed Forces. 

Education? Transport? Health? Public Safety? Immigration? When we should see improvements we see undeliverable promises and scandals of all sorts. 

But one has to be fair and in fairness he could not do more because of the realities of the Conservative Party that ended up with a Prime Minister that was not elected by the Electorate and was not even elected by voting members of the Conservative Party. He couldn't possibly be a strong Prime Minister because he has no power base apart from the support he got as Member of Parliament. The fact that none other than his own Chancellor of the Exchequer is throwing the towel tells you that it is game over. In the end, where are the heavyweights of the Conservative Party?

We have got a Secretary for Defence - Grant Shapps - that believes that being the descendant of people who suffered persecution in Europe 70 or so years ago is a crucially important qualification to be Secretary for Defence. Never mind if he does not possess any specific qualification for the post as man in charge of dealing with the defense of the Realm. Where are the heavyweights? The real knower - Ben Wallace MP - not only resigned his post as Secretary for Defence. Ben Wallace MP also announced that he will not be standing for re-election in 2024.

We see cancellations, resignations and lack of expertise that blended with a profound lack of self-confidence are a perfect recipe for disaster.

   

Enforcing migration laws reinforces rights and security

Enforcing migration laws protects rights and security. People traffickers must not be allowed to continue their illegal and potentially murderous business. Porous borders are also a gigantic national security risk and especially in the times we are going through. Who can guarantee that plotters and saboteurs will not enter the country disguised as illegal migrants? 

Britain is on the brink of all-out war. It would be fairly easy to enter and blow up military installations, carry out assassinations, damage vital infra-structure and engage in all other kinds of actions that will be critically damaging. We don't allow people to enter the country via an airport or a harbour without proper documentation. Why should thousands of people be allowed to enter the country by simply landing on the coasts without any documentation?

Rishi Sunak is on the right path to ensure both that rights are respected and British borders are secure but, as usual, Opposition politicians and political activists will be in favour of criminality as long as it suits their political agenda. 

France is a safe country and there are British diplomatic and consular agencies in France. Why not approaching a British agency in France to ask for permission to enter Britain? It is self-evident that those entering Britain illegally have no intention and never had the intention to procede legally. They are not coming for war zones. They are coming via the European Union and therefore they hiave the legal means to apply for permission if they so wanted.

Having said that, the debate is ruined by things that have little or nothing to do with the real need to control British borders and the misery created by the chaotic state of migration will go and on and everything is deemed to be placed before the altar of political correctness, criminal organisations will prosper while law abiding communities will be sacrificed.

If somebody is to be blamed, politicians in Westminster are the ones to blame for lamentable events regarding migration

 

If somebody is to be blamed, politicians in Westminster are the ones to blame for lamentable events regarding migration

The Labour Party and others blamed 'Far Right Demonstrators'. Undoubtedly, peaceful demonstrations can be highjacked by violent individuals, but the fact remains that it was for starters a peaceful demonstration in which ordinary law abiding people tried to express their anger and their frustration when their local communities are flooded with total disregard for public views. Suddenly, local inhabitants see their towns and cities overrun and their economic prospects and peaceful coexistence ruined. They talk about it, but Westminster politicians don't seem interested. They hear that their local authorities are running out of money, cutting down services and having to increase taxes that come out of depleted pockets. They ask their local representatives and their national representatives to speak for them, to actually represent their views, and they are not just blatantly ignored. They are insulted. The vast majority of those taking part in the demonstrations were not Far Right Extremists. They were ordinary people who are suffering and have no voice because those they elect to represent them are not interested in representing their views.

Homelessness amongst the local inhabitants has not decreased. In fact, it has increased. Everywhere you see people sleeping rough. Many are struggling to keep a roof over their heads or living in accommodation that is not fit for purpose. On the other hand, they see thousands of illegal migrants crossing the Channel and being given what they - the ordinary people of Great Britain - are denied. Are there laws in Britain? Are there immigration policies in Britain? Those who have the obbligation of enforcing laws are willfully allowing violation of immigration laws.

National and local authorities have created a fertile environment for violence to occur.  

David Amess: Victim of the lack of true integration

 

David Amess

The life of yet another Member of Parliament comes to an abrupt end. Britain as a country is under attack because Britain has dared to be open and welcoming to people who do not share Britain’s values because they were brought up in a very different environment and very different culture. We can talk about integration until we become red in the face, but the reality is that some might live in Britain for many years, some might be born in Britain and grow up in Britain enjoying what Britain has to offer and still reject Britain and see Britain as a foreign land. Many might not even speak the language of the country even where they were born in the United Kingdom.

David Amess, a family man who was Member of Parliament for several decades and earnt the respect and admiration of his peers and of those he represented, lost his life because of the gap that exists between the aspirations regarding integration and the realities of the lack of integration. It is about understanding that integration is not possible while there are ghetto realities. The attacker did not act alone. This was a premeditated attack. Ali Harbi Ali grew up in Croydon, Southeast London. Ghetto realities are exactly the opposite of integration.

Diversity when diversity does not include a common British identity is not acceptable. We must respect peoples’ diverse cultures, but we must all share values that unite us regardless of backgrounds and this should be a fundamental point starting with education so that children – regardless of backgrounds – grow up together and learn together as one. 

Talking about respecting differences, allowing ghetto realities with people living in Britain that often not even use English as their main language, without fostering a true national British identity, is one of the main reasons why David Amess was murdered while he was doing his job, the job he was elected to do. 

Covid-19: Back to school, back to work, back to life

Since March 2020, Britain has been on downwards spiral because of its efforts to tackle a pandemic that started very far away from its shores. 

The United Kingdom has witnessed a new level of awareness concerning immigration. The open-doors policy, with little control of who comes in and who goes out, has killed more than a 100 thousand people in the United Kingdom. Thousands upon thousands of British families mourn a loss relatives. In some some families, several members perished.

As the flow of pretend refugees continues, many of them have been found to be infected with viruses that could literally killed them and those they come into contact with. 

For decades, Britain has cared and control the flow of dogs and cats with legal quarantines to prevent illnesses like rabies but, paradoxically, has allowed the free flow of people without the vitally required sanitary controls. Britain, like other countries, has paid a very high price for the policies supported by liberals and left-wingers. Open Doors? In your dreams. No more. From now on, everybody coming to the United Kingdom should be subjected to stringent sanitary controls to ensure that people living the United Kingdom are safe from pests brought in. Will stringent sanitary measures be implemented? Lets see. Very soon Liberals and Left-Wingers will say that stopping illnesses is 'a Human Rights violation'.

The one industry that has been extremely busy in recent months is the industry of funeral parlors and undertakers as more than 100,000 lives were lost to the pandemic brought into Britain from overseas.

Now that there are plans to go back to school, back to work and back to life, lets remember how such a pandemic was possible. It was possible thanks to the Open-Doors policies supported by Liberal and Left-Wingers.

  

We want Britain to become, once again, a buoyant and vibrant economy. We must never forget that the pile of deaths was brought to the United Kingdom by unsuitable immigration policies. Yes, dogs and cats can bring in illnesses, but every years millions of peoples were coming in or passing through British ports of entry without any crucial sanitary controls. 

Covid-19: Walk. Don't run. We do need a health MOT.

The fact that people are being vaccinated and that more than 15 million people living in the United Kingdom have received the first doses of several vaccines used doesn't change the fact that the NHS is still working over-capacity with many thousands of patients that require special treatment to keep those seriously affected by Covid-19 alive.

We should not be overly pessimistic, but we shouldn't be overly optimistic either. I am fully aware of the damage done to the economy and of the negative repercussions of the quarantine measures put in place to prevent the spread of the disease. Other diseases have gone untreated. The number of those suffering from some form of mental illness has skyrocketted. 

The idea of implementing better coordination of different services within the so called Welfare State could be one of the best ideas being considered. NHS, Social Services, the services that care of old and the disabled, and every other branch of the Welfare State need to work together.

For a very long time, we have cared more about the transit of animals, plants and minerals in and out of the country than about the transit of human beings that can carry diseases with them. For many years, animals brought into the country have gone into quarantine to ensure that they were healthy enough to be allowed in. For far too long, any human being coming from abroad could enter the country freely without any health checks to protect public health. What Covid-19 has done is to prove how foolish we have been. A virus coming from China has killed more than 100,000 people in the United Kingdom. Cars have MOT. Why shouldn't human beings have some form of health MOT to prove that they do not constitute a risk for the rest of the population?

Covid-19 didn't exist in the United Kingdom. It was brought in via ports of entry (Airports, Harbours, Railway Stations). There should have been sanitary controls at each port of entry. The sanitary controls established because of Covid-19 should become the norm and be enforced to prevent any future catastrophe.

 

 

World in Crisis: The unforeseen leading to even more unforeeen events.

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties hypocrisy

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties' hypocrisy

Gerard Batten and Tommy Robinson

Gerard Batten's Dilemma was created by Nigel Farage when Nigel Farage - without questioning - surrendered UKIP to Political Correctness. Why? All other political parties have former BNP members, former NF members, former EDL members and even former IRA members.

The Labour Party has the highest numbers of BNP, NF and EDL former members. In fact, Jeremy Corbyn was elected and re-affirmed as Labour Party Leader with BNP, NF and EDL former members votes.

The BBC didn't look into it. SKY News didn't look into it. They just focused on UKIP to chastise UKIP for something all other political parties have done. A former IRA members represents the Conservative Party in Greater London.

Today, the House of Commons and everything around the Houses of Parliament had to do with Brexit and the votes on a series of amendments presented by both Government and Opposition. I met Gerard Batten and spoke with him about these issues directly. Why? Because the London Regional Press Office asks questions directly. I met Gerard Batten near the House of Commons and we spoke about these issues and the fact that Tommy Robinson contracted as Adviser cannot stand for election representing UKIP because he is not a member of UKIP and he is not a member of UKIP because UKIP's Membership Rules explicitly excludes former members of the BNP and of EDL. Tommy Robinson was a BNP member and was also an EDL member.

But there is another paradox. Despite the fact that officially UKIP Membership Rules exclude former members of BNP, and EDL from becoming members of UKIP, UKIP has members that were at one point in time members of BNP, NF and EDL. How did this happen? Well, those who were not publicly known members of BNP, NF and EDL existed under the radar. 

As Gerard Batten explained to me personally in a face to face conversation, UKIP introduced the said Membership Rules to avoid being infiltrated by BNP, NF and EDL and others.

Nobody knows for certain what will happen on March 29th 2019. Nobody knows what will happen before March 29th 2019. What is certain is that a group of minority parties are struggling to get the support of individuals that occupy practically the same segment of public opinion. The announcement by Nigel Farage that he wants to create a new political party doesn't help. In fact, it divides even more those who share certain political views. 

What will happen when issues like Abortion come to the fore? What will happen when they have to decide on Economic Policies or Foreign Affairs? Will minority parties maintain the same level of support they have until now? They might be united with regards to Islam or Immigration? Will they be united when it comes to a whole range of others issues that any political party has to deal with?

   

President Obama: Nobel Prize for peace in Palestine? What peace in Palestine?

President Obama: Nobel Prize for peace in Palestine? What peace in Palestine?

As we follow what has been happening in Palestine and in the Middle East in general, we ask the question again: what was the Nobel Prize for Barak Obama about? What has fundamentally changed in the situation being faced by Israelis and Palestinians? What long term beneficial arrangement has been reached?

But lets also look at other issues and one of such issues is Libya and what happened in Libya during President Obama's administration with Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. The Arab Spring turned into the Arab Nightmare that became Europe's nightmare. The US Administration created refugees and Europe had to deal with the refugees and/or economic migrants (whichever title you want to give to the massive number of people who were displaced or simply decided to move out of their own countries in search for the Christian Paradise that many are trying to turn into a Muslim Dominion.

This is not only about the wisdom of military interventions. It is about the consequences of disastrous US Foreign Policies under a Democratic Administration. USA is far away from Africa, Middle East and Asia Minor, but it is Europe the one that has to deal with the consequences of disastrous US Foreign Policies.

Did President Obama deal with North Korea? No. It was necessary to wait for President Trump to deal with North Korea and he didn't do it with weapons. President Trump did it with words, talking to people and seeking an understanding. There are no more North Korea missiles flying over neighbouring countries. No more talk about missile attacks against the USA. There is a path towards peace between two countries in the Korean Peninsula. No more resources invested in wasteful naval military exercises seen as a threat and justification for nuclear developments. Is there any talk about giving President Trump a Nobel Prize? 

When President Trump talks about immigration, he refers to legal immigration. Is it wrong to say that anybody coming to the USA must have proper documentation? The Democratic Party supports Illegal Immigration. How can Democratic support for Illegal Immigration be compatible with National Security?

The leaders of the Democratic Party are against defending the USA faced with Illegal Immigration and are willing to bring the entire state administration to a halt so that they can get their way. With this behaviour, the Democratic Party doesn't stand for American Values and doesn't stand for US National Security either. Legal means legal. I wouldn't dream about travelling to the USA without proper documentation. 

Britain's recipes for disaster: Policing in crisis via irrational budget cuts

Britain's recipes for disaster: Policing in crisis via irrational budget cuts

The news that local communities are having to step in to replace absent Police Forces that have been cut to the bone to the point that they have become ineffective is not the image a successful country can offer to the world. The news that Britain doesn't have enough Border Police resources to patrol its own coast to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country is not the image a successful country can offer to the world.

We can build very expensive aircraft carriers. We can have a Nuclear Deterrent. We can invest billions in Defence. But if we don't have the minimum resources to deal with vital areas of public security and public safety, we are doomed as a country.

Neither Conservatives, nor Labour, nor Liberal Democrats, none of the so called mainstream political parties have the vision that is need to keep Britain safe and this is why we need National Socialism to deal with public security and public safety, to ensure that everybody is safe without the stupidity promoted by Political Correctness.

When prisons are drugs and violence safe heavens, when we are not safe in our streets and in our own homes, when criminals known to Security Forces can carry out murderous attacks because we don't have neither the resources nor the intelligence to deal with threats we are doomed as a country.

For all the speeches about 'lessons will be learnt', Security Services in this country are not fit for purpose and the Political Establishment and the Mass Media are very much to blame for this nightmare.

Hillary Clinton: Moving sideways

Hillary Clinton: Moving Sideways

Opportunistic Hillary Clinton advises European Union 'to deal with issue of immigration to counter rise of Far Right'. This has been for her followers and/or admirers the equivalent of been awoken with a cold shower.

Their Hero has shown herself for what she really is: An opportunistic career politician that will say whatever comes to her mind depending on which way the wind is blowing, somebody who has no principles nor moral values. Her European devotees walk around with placards with the word "refugees welcome". She now says that politicians must say that "refugees are not welcome" in order to prevent the rise of the Far Right.

We couldn't make it up. You only need to listen to what she says about President Trump and then listen to what she says about 'countering the rise of the Far Right' to see that she is not the real McCoy. She tried very hard to win the nomination competing with Barak Obama but painfully lost it. The second time she tried she won the nomination playing dirty tricks against fellow Democrats only to lose the election to Donald Trump. She has constantly criticised President Donald Trump, distorting what the President has said about immigration and now she tells the EU not to allow more immigrants to get in.

With people like Hillary Clinton the Democratic Party has touched rock bottom. This the person responsible for turning Libya into a worse country. Libya was a buffer zone. Thanks to Hillary Clinton, Libya was turned into fertile ground for Terrorism and flood immigration towards the European Continent.

UN Migration Pact : Population Replacement Pact

UN Migration Pact: Population Replacement Pact

Several countries have already announced that they will not sign up the so called UN Migration Pact because it effectively opens the door to ethnic cleansing. The Organisation that was created in 1945 at the end of World War Two to promote peace has become a means to get rid of national identities, an agenda that could have disastrous consequences and lead to another World War.

Generation Identity UK & Ireland October 2018 Newsletter - The UN Migration PACT  Update - The UN Migration Pact In the last GISG Newsletter, we examined the UN Migration Pact which is due to be finally signed at a UN summit in Marrakesh, Morocco on 11 December 2018. The Pact has now been re-badged as the Global Compact for Migration (GCM), and is the latest stage in the creation of a global framework of both binding, and ‘advisory’ supra-national agreements and structures relating to mass migration. The effect of that inter-locking framework is to create and embed formal mechanisms that will result in the Great Replacement of Europeans in their homelands. The GCM builds on the Marrakesh Agreement May 2018, and The Barcelona Declaration 1995, and is the latest in a continuing programme of global governance policy formation designed to prevent democratic control over borders and nations. An outline of the GCM, and the earlier Marrakesh Agreement, and the Barcelona Declaration can be found in our last two GISG Newsletters, to which the reader is referred.   Recent developments Over the last few weeks there have been developments in relation to the GCM that we report on here. The UN itself has begun a propaganda programme to support the upcoming December summit, although, so far, it has been a limited offensive. Unsurprisingly, very little, if anything, has appeared in the mainstream media about the GCM, neither have mainstream politicians made any commentary (at least, not in the UK). However, the Identitarian Movement in Europe has begun to raise awareness, and some patriotic politicians have begun to talk about the threat posed by the GCM. UN Propagana  A month ago, the UN released a short propaganda film, ‘What is the Global compact for migration?’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL87BK5OSz8&index=2&list=PLwoDFQJEq_0Y-lZxNM6nFXWteTM4oUjM9 Featuring smiling women and children throughout, the UN propaganda presents mass migration as an unalloyed good. Dealing in absolutes, the film states that ‘migration is an engine of growth and entrepreneurship’, and that migrants sent ‘$450 billion to developing countries in 2017’, while spending ’85% of their earnings in their host countries’. No opposing arguments or statistics are presented. The film does, however, make clear that the GCM is ‘the first ever agreement to cover all aspects of international migration’. In this, it is correct, as all aspects, both direct and indirect are covered. It will embed standards that all signatories will be expected to adhere to, and those standards will cover not only the facilitation of mass migration into Europe and the West, but will also require governments to present strongly positive narratives surrounding migration, while taking steps to prevent, and punish, opposition to mass migration and the Great Replacement. Although the UN film has been in circulation for a month, it has had no wider coverage. On YouTube, there have only been 6,464 views. Interestingly, it has received over 1,000 ‘dislikes’ and only 36 ‘likes’. Further, of the 258 comments, the overwhelming majority are hostile to the GCM and the UN. What is interesting is that, in keeping with the run-up to the signing in December, this small, unheralded video, represents the UN’s main information on the GCM to the public. Similarly, in the UK, only one article has appeared in any mainstream media outlet, either print or broadcast, about the GCM. That article was a highly supportive one in The Guardian. Alerting the people to the threat Although the mainstream media and politicians have failed to alert the public to the GCM and its clear dangers, others have begun to highlight the threat. The Austrian Identitarian Movement (IBO) has led the way, with its co-leader, Martin Sellner, producing seven German-language videos about the GCM. In addition, the IBO have established an important campaign website against the GCM, which is full of detail about the pact and its implications: https://migrationspakt-stoppen.info The IBO has also called for all patriots to rally outside the UN building in Vienna on Sunday, 4 November: https://www.facebook.com/events/334541660439265/ , which is also covered in this news article: https://www.tagesstimme.com/2018/10/19/wien-demo-un-migrationspakt-november/ The IBO has created a Twitter feed about the GCM and the campaign against it: https://twitter.com/migrationspakt This activity has raised the profile of the issue in Austria, and, to some extent in Germany, and there is some suggestion that Austria might follow the lead of Hungary and the United States and refuse to sign the pact (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-un-migrants-austria/austria-has-concerns-about-u-n-migration-pact-might-back-out-idUSKCN1MK2EJ ). This is highly unlikely to happen in Germany, although Alternative for Germany (AfD) politicians are protesting against the GCM. In the United Kingdom, the only politician that has raised the GCM is the leader of UKIP, Gerard Batten, MEP. In a tweet of 17 October, Batten commented: ‘UN Global Compact For Safe, Orderly & Regular Migration. Euro Parl will vote on this at the end of 2018. It seeks to make illegal immigration legal, make it easier, and criminalise opposition under ‘racism & xenophobia’ laws. If they succeed then millions more will come.’ By the time the European ‘Parliament’ votes on it, the GCM will be a done deal – as usual, the European ‘Parliament’ simply acts as a dictatorship’s rubber stamp. At the moment, Gerard Batten is the only elected politician to have identified the threat. GENERATION IDENTITY UK & IRELAND are taking steps to alert people to the GCM. We have posted about the pact on our social media accounts, and we have started a petition to stop the UN Migration Pact. Make sure you sign it, and share it as widely as possible on all social media outlets: https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-stop-the-united-nations-migration-pact In addition, we will shortly have a range of flyers and stickers about the pact: What you can do Very few people have heard of the GCM, even fewer understand the implications. The first step is to get the news of this highly dangerous pact out. You can: Make sure you understand the GCM and its implications. Read our last two GISG Newsletters for information. Follow up on the various links provided above. Sign GI’s petition. Tell your friends and family about the pact and explain the danger that it poses to our existence as Europe and the West, and the threat to our basic democratic liberties. Keep in touch with GI, support our growing campaign.   Please sign and share our petition to raise awareness. We are a grassroots volunteer organisation. We rely on donations to keep our activities going. If you like or support our campaigns you can donate securely from our website:- https://www.generation-identity.org.uk/donations/ Thankyou Generation Identity   Generation Identity UK & Ireland  https://www.generation-identity.org info@generation-identity.org.uk/ This email was sent to kghohenstauffen@btconnect.com You received this email because you opted to receive emails from Generation Identity Unsubscribe here Sent by © 2018 Generation Identity UK & Ireland  The UN Migration Pact is the latest in the series of agreements that our governments, and the EU, have entered into. Together, the Barcelona Declaration, Marrakesh Agreement and UN Migration Pact create a multi-layered, interlocking framework that impacts heavily on Europe. Whatever the motivation, the outcome of these agreements is to enable and ensure the continued colonisation of Europe. Further, there is also a commitment to criminalise any opposition to the ensuing Great Replacement and the narrative that enables this transformation to take place. Finally, the powerful cultural forces of the mainstream media and education have been co-opted into this programme which will result in Europeans becoming minorities in their own homelands. Resisting the policy   Once formally signed in December, 2018, the UN Migration Pact will be used as yet another tool to silence opposition and dissent, and to attack governments who respond to the wishes of their peoples in respect of the migrant-invasion. The UN deliberations and agreements, like those of Barcelona in 1995 and Marrakesh in May 2018, received little mainstream media coverage, and the forthcoming signing even less. The first step that all democrats and patriots should take is to raise their own, and others awareness of the Pact, and the fact that it is just the latest manifestation of this framework to ensure the Great Replacement The co-leader of the Austrian Identitarian Movement (IBO), Martin Sellner, and Brittany Pettibone have made a short video about the threat:- Dangerous and Disturbing: The UN Migration Pact. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmf_V0lbWwg In addition, the Austrian Identitarian Movement (IBO) has begun a campaign to raise awareness and promote resistance. GENERATION IDENTITY UK and IRELAND have started a petition to stop the UN Migration Pact. Please sign it, and share it as widely as possible on all social media outlets: https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-stop-the-united-nations-migration-pact This is the beginning of our campaign to alert Europeans to this latest threat to our continued existence as a community in our ancestral homelands. We will alert all those who are signed up to the GISG Newsletter to new developments.