USA/Russia: Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are gleamour of hope

USA/Russia: Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are gleamour of hope

For those of us that remember the old days - 1962 included - despite all comments about how bad things are at the moment, things could not be any worse in 1962 when Kennedy and Khrushev almost went to blows over the issue of missiles in Cuba. The fact that a President is ready to walk his half of the way to do what needs to be done is refreshing and the words of Winston Churchill about 'jaw jaw better than war war' come loud and clear.

A few weeks ago, North Korea was launching missiles and violating the air space of Japan. Today, North Korea is no longer launching missiles across neighbouring countries nor threatening to attack the USA. Who managed to put an end to the military fever that could have started a major conflict? President Donald Trump. He confounded both friends and foes and talked directly to the North Korean President.

Now, President Donald Trump is talking with Vladimir Putin because once again 'jaw jaw is better than war war' and being criticised for wanting to deal with all issues in a business-like manner. Who is attacking President Trump? The criminals that prefer war and conflict are attacking President Trump, the prostitutes of the mass media and of the establishment that sold their souls to Satan in the pursuit of money by whatever means.

President Donald Trump talks about a strong USA but also talks about dialogue as the main tools to resolve any disputes. By the way, isn't dialogue the way proposed by the Organisation of the United Nations created in 1945 as the main way to resolve disputes? By talking to friends and foes directly, President Trump is applying a fundamental principle of the Organisation of the United Nations.

I would suggest that all those pseudo journalists and politicians that want wars and conflicts should be forcefully enlisted and sent to the battlefield. That will cure them. Put the said journalists and politicians on the firing line to change their ways.

Britain's future hanging from a thread

Britain's Future hangs from a thread

With the arrival of Britain's chief negotiator for talks with his EU counterpart, everything is for the taking/losing.

EU authorities asked all remaining members of the European Union to prepare for No Deal while in Britain whatever was agreed at Checkers by the Conservative Party Cabinet is a poison chalice that has created cross party political anger for various reasons and put the survival of Theresa May into question. From both sides of the political divide concerning the EU, so called White Paper is seen as an act of treason that puts Britain in the middle of road and ready to be crashed by passing traffic.

The country has been undoubtedly divided but we are now entering a cycle of polarisation that could have extremely serious consequences including widespread violence. Trying to please everybody, the British Prime Minister has put her neck on the chopping block and leadership is badly needed to get Britain out of the present and very serious predicament.

Should Theresa May fall, the Conservative Party would still lack an absolute majority in Parliament and it could mean that even with the votes of the Democratic Unionist Party there wouldn't be enough seats to allow the Conservative Party to rule without being a minority government because depending on who succeeds Theresa May there will be Conservative MPs that would walk away. Not for the first time the ruling Conservative Party has been divided about how to deal with the European Union.

As it has been said over and over again, the country must be ready for No Deal and all government departments have been asked to make preparations for No Deal but, as things stand at the moment, the country must also prepare for the possibility of a General Election in the autumn. But even if there was a General Election, such General Election is not expected to provide a new political balance as both Conservatives and Labour face their own internal divisions. 

Of Spitfires and Hurricanes

Of Spitfires and Hurricanes

I have seen quite a few documentaries referring to the making of Spitfires and Hurricanes and about the development of the Royal Navy - Royal Air Force and Royal Navy being two key branches of the British Armed Forces but seldom or never I see questions raised about the fact that Britain doesn't make any major warplanes anymore - apart for the Euro Fighter that was shared with other European countries, came late into service and was already outdated before entering active service. Not very often we hear questions asked about why British shipyards are less active than ever before and why Britain is buying off-the shelf imports like the F35. Defence industries have been either privatised or dismantled or bypassed to buy foreign products.

Neither Labour nor Conservatives are the answer to Britain's problems and don't count on Liberals that would dismantle whatever is left of the British Armed Forces. There is no long term strategy that could be said to be British. The brand news aircraft carriers will not carry British planes but American planes. The British Independent Nuclear Deterrent is neither independent nor British. It totally depends on the US.

All the talk about preparing Britain to face new challenges is pure chit chat because in fact very little is being done to beef up the British Armed Forces. More people are leaving the Services and there is a recruitment crisis. Expertise is being lost and numbers are not growing. Britain is less prepared today to face new challenges than Britain was prepared to face new challenges in the 1930s and by then Britain had a more homogeneous population and didn't have to be on permanent red alert to counter imported terrorists.

Countering Islamic Terrorism and putting and end to flood immigration are issues of National Security. Instead of keeping them in jail at public expense, all Muslim terrorists should be thrown out together with their families. The Demographic Balance must be restored. Britain will not be able to defend itself if it has people that following a depraved political ideology called Islam are ready and willing to stab Britain in the back.  

Jailing people for Reckless Statements could be violation of Human Rights

Jailing People for Reckless Statements could be violation of Human Rights

In Totalitarian Britain, Police Forces are being used for Political Persecution and I must emphasise the word 'used' because at the end of the day if they are used to terrorise and persecute for political purposes they are just following orders given by their masters.

People get angry. People get frustrated. People express their anger openly and this is only human. People say things that in normal conditions they wouldn't say and we need to have a degree of understanding of why sometimes human beings react, explode with anger.

In Politically Correct Britain, the expression 'causing offence' is being used to terrorise individuals to deter them from using their Freedom of Speech to the point when Freedom of Speech is no more. The truth can be offensive to those who don't want the truth to be told.

Hating other people is normal. It is absolutely human. Expressing harsh criticism against other people is absolutely normal. If you hate somebody, it is your human right to say 'I hate so and so'. If you hate a Jew or a Muslim, if you hate a Conservative MP, a Labour MP or an MP of whatever political party, it should be totally normal and acceptable to say it as loud as you can and as publicly as you can. But we live in a Totalitarian State in which only those who are more equal than others are free to express their hatred.

If want to say that you hate an individual classed as Far Right, you can say it without fear of 'causing offence' and without fear of being accused of 'hate speech'. Jews and Muslims are free to insult and threaten anybody else. But beware if you are the one saying that you hate Jews or Muslims. You will be arrested and most probably jailed accused of anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, racism and of indulging in hate speech.

The direct consequence of double standards is that, at the end of the day, double standards will fuel anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and Jews and Muslims will be targeted and in some cases killed because repression and double standards make people feel that they are discriminated against and persecuted for expressing their anger while Jews and Muslims are allowed to get away with murder.

Lets look at the conduct of mass media and politicians when it comes to those they hate. They are free to attack, to libel and defame and even threaten those they hate but the same freedom is not accorded to ordinary people or to those they hate.

If an ordinary individual and those classed as Far Right were to say what some politicians and mass media or those classed as 'antifa' say, they would be arrested and jailed.

We are all human beings. We love and we hate and rightly so. No one should be persecuted or harassed for expressing their love or their hatred towards others. We must get rid of Political Correctness and legislation that prevent us from being human and in the process we will free the courts for courts to be used to deal with real crimes.

You hate Jews? So what? You hate Muslims? So what? As long as you don't go out armed and with intent to attack somebody, you should be free to express your hatred. Unfortunately, with every passing day, we go deeper and deeper into the realm of sheer stupidity in which legislation is being used to destroy human beings and to create robots. Are you offended? Be offended if you wish. I am offended by high levels of mental retardation that I have witnessed in British courts.



 

Jayda Fransen: Is this happening in Britain?

Look at the conditions for release. Is this really Britain? Once thing is certain: when this happens Great Britain is gone and we are left with 'britain' with small letters. It is as shameful as it is dangerous. But right now, doesn't surprise me in a country in which a man was convicted in Scotland for teaching his girlfriend's dog to raise a leg. If you ask the right questions about issues that really matter you risk being sent to jail or worse. 

Britain: A lot more to worry about

Britain: a lot more to worry about

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/couple-ban-neighbours-look-home-east-sussex-dispute-council-cpn-order-a8423256.html

Britain is now cuckooland. The amount of irrational legislation going through Parliament is absolutely beyond belief and the fact that Police Forces are being used to enforce such levels of irrationality is beyond the pale.

While real crime is on the rise with dramatic consequences in terms of loss of life, Police Forces are being used as toilet paper to implement ridiculous pieces of legislation and engage in political persecution.

The usual talk about lack of Police officers is an absolute lie. There are more than enough Police officers. The point is not about the lack of Police officers but about the way Police officers are being used.

Police officers recording a demonstration for Brexit. They are standing with cameras on a balcony at one of the headquarters of the BBC in Millbank, Central London. This is usual procedure. Practically, every single public event is recorded and later on recordings can be used and are used as evidence in courts of law.

Jeremy Bedford Turner, an activist that criticised Jewish Power in the United Kingdom, was taken to court and jailed for daring to criticise Jewish Power by people who said that 'they were offended by what he said'. The truth of what he said wasn't actually challenged. The whole issue was about 'being offended by what he said'. A similar case involved Alison Chabloz, a musician that composed songs that challenged the veracity of what is being said by Jewish lobbies and repeated by Establishment and mass media about what really happened during World War Two. Once again, the charges were about 'offensive comments'. The veracity of what she said was never challenged because in actual fact there is not enough evidence to support what has become a myth. All we have about real numbers of those affected by World War Two is estimates, numbers that could never be proven with irrefutable evidence.

Crime is rising and most importantly serious crime is rising and lives are being lost, but Police resources are being diverted and used in harassment and political persecution. 

Angela Merkel: CDU and CSU at war on immigration

Not if but when

Should there be a Federal Election in Germany, CDU/CSU would get less than 30 per cent of the vote. CDU and CSU are at war. The issue: Immigration. CDU is the Titanic and CSU that still holds 40% of the vote in Bavaria doesn't want to sink together with CDU. 

In October 2018, there will be elections in Bavaria and Alternative für Deutschland would make important gains. CSU insists that Germany should turn back asylum-seekers registered in other EU countries at its national borders. Merkel says this violates the EU's principle of freedom of movement and is seeking European-wide and multi-lateral solutions, solutions opposed by Austria, Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic and Italy, among others, who profoundly dislike Angela Merkel's intentions of flooding the EU with migrants.

CSU that threatened to impose border checks and the clock is ticking away. Would Angela Merkel be able to survive until the end of 2018. If she goes, there will be two political parties to watch: CSU and Alternative für Deutschland. If Angela Merkel goes, there will be a new Germany and EU will no longer be the same or will not even be anymore.

Bavaria is Germany's economic powerhouse. With Germany's power-base increasingly angry because of the immigration mess, it is not inconceivable that they will support stricter immigration policies that will put Germany on a collision course with Angela Merkel's policies.

A trade war with USA doesn't help Angela Merkel. In tit for tat, Germany will be the loser. Steel, aluminium and car manufacturing are the sectors to be most affected and this means job losses in German manufacturing. Add this to the fact that Germany will be forced to pay a lot more to balance the books of the European Union after Britain exist and this can only mean higher taxation to be paid for mostly by German industrialists and manufacturers.

Germany is a key country in Europe and Germany will follow the trend towards immigration controls and deportations. It is not a matter of if but a matter of when.

 

USA illegal migration driven by loving parents?

Do loving parents put the lives of the children in the hands of people traffickers and send them across the boarders of a foreign country?

The British Prime Minister Theresa May has been quick to condemn the actions of the American government that tries to prevent illegal immigration and some British mass media have jumped on the bandwagon criticising President Donald Trump.

Now let's look at the facts. When unaccompanied children cross the border entering another country illegally the parents of the said children are very much responsible. Would a loving parent put the lives of their children in danger by sending them into the unknown to potentially face the danger of being sexually abused or even killed?

The Mexican government should take legal action against the parents of the said children because the parents are abandoning their children by putting them in the hands of strangers that turn them into illegal immigrants.

The Mexican government should put the said parents in jail and use its Armed Forces to secure Mexican borders and arrest criminals who are benefiting from illegal immigration.

When Hate Speech Legislation becomes a tool for repression

Hate Speech Legislation becomes repression tool to deter people from speaking their minds in the same manner that Jesus's Disciples were told not to talk about Jesus after Jesus crucified. Today, it is the equivalent of the State using Hate Speech Legislation.

During World War Two, British soldiers were supposed to have given their lives to defend Free Speech but the Elites running Britain used secrecy and propaganda to stop people from learning the whole truth about the actions undertaken many of which contradict the official version of events.

Keeping records hidden from public view is not about protecting British interests. It is about protecting those who engage in wrongdoing. In the words of Mikhail Gorbachev, Britain needs a lot of Perestroika (Re-structuring) and Glasnost (Transparency). 

Nigerian born Priest reminds everybody about Britain's Christian Foundation

Nigerian born Priest reminds Britons about the Christian Foundation of Britain and the fact that Political Correctness is destroying Britain as a Christian Country.

Amber Rudd MP has blood on her hands

Amber Rudd MP, as the most incompetent Home Secretary Britain has ever had and one of the shortest-lived in her post as Home Secretary after she lied to Parliament about the Windrush Affair involving the destruction of immigration documents that led to deportation of Black immigrants who were brought to Britain to rebuild a country ravaged by war, has blood on her hands.

Sending a man to jail for sticking bacon on the doors of a Mosque only for the said man to be murdered by Muslim Extremists in a British jail was one of the most irrational actions ever undertaken by a British Home Secretary.

Racially aggravated public disorder? Islam is a religion and Muslims are not a race. Aggravated public disorder? If somebody goes around running over pedestrians or a group of people steals vans and uses them to go around killing people on the streets, this is what I would consider aggravated-public disorder but sticking a piece of bacon on doors is not a risk to human life but it is a crime in the minds of an Establishment that has lost the plot completely. 

But not only that and it will go straight to the point. I do believe that killing more than 50 people and injuring many others in an attack in London in 2005 and in other events that followed also in London and in Manchester can be qualified as a terrorist attack. Having said that, I don't think that posting stickers at an University can be classified as a terrorist attack and even so an entire group of people - one of them Paul Hickman - were classed as terrorists and their group was banned.

I know that most people in the United Kingdom reject Capital Punishment but the events that led to the death of Paul Hickman constitute Capital Punishment. Faced with the real threat of being sent to jail, Paul Hickman took his own life. Capital Punishment for what? For posting stickers at an University. Amber Rudd MP's actions at the Home Office constitute Racism on a massive scale. She was complicit and when asked about it in the House of Commons she lied about it and ultimately lost her post as Home Secretary because of it. So she is one of the least qualified in the House of Commons to criticise anybody else for racism after some high ranking officials of a Conservative government engaged in an exercise of Institutionalised Racism.

I knew personally several of those accused of belonging to National Action and I not only knew them. I worked with several of them in perfectly lawful political activities. I worked with Paul Hickman then Regional Organiser. He was a kind and soft man and I remember him with affection.

I do not condone nor support irrational acts of violence but Paul Hickman was not a Terrorist. Idiots like Amber Rudd put lives in danger when she was supposed to prevent loss of life. What can you expect of an administration that via political reshuffles puts incompetent people in charge and gives them extraordinary powers? Cabinet Ministers in posts like the post of Home Secretary must have a proven record showing that they will meet the requirements of the job.

Look at her record both in government and outside government. Can anybody say that she had the qualifications to be Home Secretary, one of the most difficult cabinet posts? No, she had none of the qualifications required. She had no previous experience whatsoever and this is why her actions could only lead to disaster and loss of life.

Robbie Mullen: A very unreliable witness that states that he is racist, anti-Semite and Islamophobe

Robbie Mullen: A very unreliable witness that states that he is racist, anti-Semite and Islamophobe

This morning at Courtroom 8 at the Old Bailey in Central London we witnessed the most astonishing confession by a man that under oath as a witness in a case that he himself contributed to bring to court. When asked why he joined National Action in 2015, Robbie Mullen said that joined National Action because 'he hates Blacks, Jews and Muslims'. If this is not an indictment against himself, I don't know what is.

Having been one of the most notorious and vociferous members of National Action, Robbie Mullen  when asked why he didn't join National Front instead said that he didn't join National Front that he saw as a group of old men and that he was looking for action. 

Despite the fact that National Action was finally proscribed, Robbie Mullen continued attending meetings and complaining that nothing was being done. As days went by, there was a turn of events. Robbie Mullen decided to turn against those he had joined and started a series of secretly recorded conversations - his former associates were not made aware of the fact that he was recording what they were saying and that he was instigating them to say something that even as a joke or said as a stupid remark under the influence of alcohol could put them in a very compromising position.

Robbie Mullen was a man on a mission and he came up with a series of statements linking his former associates with attempts to commit serious crimes. Paradoxically, despite the fact that he said that he believed that there was the real intention to commit serious crimes that involved loss of life, he failed to contact Police authorities. Robbie Mullen chose instead to contact Matthew Collins, former National Front member, now working for Hope Not Hate. From the moment he contacted Matthew Collins, Hope Not Hate started supplying important amounts of money to Robbie Mullen. There were monies for a passport, monies for daily expenses including transport, monies to pay for rented accommodation, computer hardware, a photographic camera and hotel rooms paid by Hope Not Hate. Some of the monies were delivered to him in paper envelopes and taken by him without any questions asked - according to what Robbie Mullen stated today at the Old Bailey pressed by barristers representing the interests of the accused. 

According to Robbie Mullen, Hope Not Hate contacted and paid a solicitor an important amount of money to act on his behalf and it was the said solicitor who got in touch with Police Authorities. When it was decided that Robbie Mullen was going to act as main witness in the present trial, Police officers explicitly requested that Robbie Mullen was not going to talk anybody else about the investigation. Robbie Mullen was asked not to talk to Police officers not directly linked to the investigation, not to talk to his former associates of National Action and not to talk to Hope Not Hate.

Robbie Mullen completely disregarded the Police officers' request and went on talking with his former associates, with other Police officers and also passing information related to the case to representatives of Hope of Hot Hate including Matthew Collins who was not aware that Robbie Mullen was secretly recording conversations he had with representatives of Hope Not Hate. One such recorded conversations was heard this morning at the Old Bailey. When asked why he had recorded a conversation he had with Matthew Collins, Robbie Mullen couldn't come up with a proper answer.

Robbie Mullen has been on the payroll of Hope Not Hate since April 2018 presumably working as 'Researcher' but before that he had been taken monies given to him by Hope Not Hate. This beggars belief. Why would Hope Not Hate employ somebody that records private conversations they have with him? One has to ask what is Robbie Mullen's real agenda. Having publicly declared that he joined National Action 'because he hates Blacks, Jews and Muslims' was not one of his best moments in court. Whether the aim of his actions is to incriminate innocent people acting on false pretences and for personal gain or whether there is a master plan behind his actions, Robbie Mullen is a very unreliable witness.   

British Daily Mail supported Adolf Hitler

Former owner of Daily Mail pictured with Adolf Hitler

British Daily Mail supported Adolf Hitler

If you don't know it yet, you might be surprised to learn that the Daily Mail newspaper that publishes articles about 'Nazi Invasion' on its digital version platform, was a full time supporter of Adolf Hitler and of Das Dritte Reich.

Yes, those running the Daily Mail cannot refute historical records. Even when at one point they stopped supported Mosley and the British Blackshirts, their support for Adolf Hitler continued and the heirs now bombard you with articles criticising the so called Far Right and the ones they label 'Holocaust Deniers'.

The British public and especially the post war generations need to be enlightened about the role the Daily Mail played promoting certain values. Most of the people the Daily Mail classifies as 'Neo-Nazis' have little to do with National Socialist ideology. In fact, many in today's 'British Far Right' are former Labour Party members that walked away from the Labour Party feeling disenfranchised when the Labour Party adopted a Globalist approach that was detrimental to the British working class.