The Crossroads of History: Arbeit Macht Frei

The Crossroads of History: Arbeit Macht Frei

For many the expression Arbeit Macht Frei (Work sets you free) is a reminder of the years of the Dritte Reich with all the usual connotations but increasingly Arbeit Macht Frei is also a reminder of the ways world economies have been developed.

We have been told that speculation is a way of creating wealth only to be confronted with one of the worst financial crisis in human history. In the past, financial crisis led to war and the present crisis shouldn’t be any different.

Hard working people are being told that they must finance, pay for, the ruinous ways of others. While the ones who created the crisis continue to enjoy undeserved wealth and prosperity, millions of people of today are suffering and the lives of those who have not even been born are being destroyed to pay for corruption.

When the Western mass media celebrated the Arab Spring revolutions, I said ‘wait for the Western Spring revolutions and you might have little to celebrate’. Reading a local newspaper, I saw a headline saying ‘politics is much more popular than ever before but political parties are in decline’. If you think carefully about the headline you will immediately see where we are heading. When peaceful ways are exhausted as means to solve the problems we are confronting, other ways will soon follow. This is not a threat. This is merely a reflection based on historical facts. The American Revolution of 1776, the French Revolution of 1789, the Russian Revolution of 1917, the rise of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP), including the dramatic fall of the Ceaucescu’s regime in Romania, are all direct consequences of social, political and economic realities that could not be channelled via peaceful means.

The British people have consistently, persistently, been denied the right to have a say in their own affairs and sooner than later, as a mass reaction or as the reaction of a few illustrated individuals, there are going to be catastrophic events.

Listening to the news, you clearly see how unrealistic and how much devoid of real understanding, so-called mainstream political parties are and how they continue using the same propagandistic and demagogic announcements to try and get people to support them. Tony Blair promised 30,000 new homes every year, only to be surpassed by Boris Johnson who promised 50,000 thousand new homes. Now, Ed Milliband and Ed Balls could even promise one million new homes instead of one hundred thousand. Why not 30 billion new homes? After all thirty billion would be more impressive. They use meaningless announcements and they have the audacity of asking for trust.

When you look at the figures, the figures tell you than 80 per cent of all new jobs created in more than a decade were given to foreigners brought in via flood immigration and homes are needed to continue and to intensify the process of colonisation of the British Isles. Places like Barking and Dagenham are being flooded and the same is happening to communities across the United Kingdom with cities that can no longer be seen as British. The seeds of violent and bloody conflicts of the future are being planted today.

Social Responsibility put under the carpet of political correctness

Social Responsibility put under the carpet of political correctness

The events happening in the United Kingdom concerning sexual grooming of children by organized Muslim gangs have reached the international arena and now the World is talking about something that until now had been a very local series of incidents.

A Muslim website comments that some Islamic leaders are saying that the whole series of events are part of an international plot to denigrate Islam. There are some parallels between the attitudes of denial of the Catholic Church regarding the actions of Catholic priests involved in sexual activities with vulnerable children they should have protected and the attitudes of Muslim elders. Muslim elders are in denial and because Muslim elders are in denial entire Muslim communities across the world are going to suffer.

What Muslim leaders in the United Kingdom should be doing is facing their responsibilities in tackling the culprits of sexual activities that degrade entire communities. Muslim leaders should be policing their own communities and ensuring that the grooming of young boys and girls stops and never happens again. If they choose to put their problems under the carpet, they themselves are going to strengthen anti-Muslim sentiments that are raging across the Western World.

Muslims are constantly blaming the so-called Far Right for crimes Muslims have committed. Well, the Far Right does not go around in gangs raping boys and girls because they are not Muslim. Rather than blaming those who denounce the crimes, the Muslim elders should be chasing the Muslim gangs that engage in criminal activities.

As a wider community, regardless of religion or political views, we all have shared responsibilities. It has been on the news the case of a 30-year-old married man who fled the country with one of his pupils, a 15-year-old girl. We react as a society, regardless of religion or political views.

I say it and I say it again. I said it when talking to representatives of the Muslim Community on television: crime is crime, regardless of religion, race, gender or any social condition or background. I said many times that unless every one of us is safe  nobody is safe.    

Being in Dock: procrastination leading to violence

Being in the Dock: Postponing the answers that ultimately will have to be produced

Tolerance has sometimes an unwanted by-product: a complaisant attitude leading to procrastination that ultimately leads to a major crisis. Enoch Powell was not a racist. Enoch Powell was a realist. In spite of being a champion of the British Empire, he perfectly understood the needs for consistency and that lack of consistency leads to confrontation.

When British control over the Subcontinent came to an end, the British withdrawal was followed by partition and partition was as inevitable as bloody. The birth of India and Pakistan as independent countries is the key to understand the dangers that we face today in Britain. When you see militant Muslims trying to take control on the British mainland, such attempts are no more than what happened in a previous century with tragic consequences.

In more than one way, there is no need to talk about the Quran. Let’s look at the history records. Without going so far in time, the Balkans civil war is yet another example. Today, we have the former Yugoslavia transformed into fragments of fragments of its former self. It wasn’t enough with the creation of several independent countries like Serbia and Montenegro, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Slovenia and Macedonia. Kosovo, occupied my Muslim Albanians, is now becoming yet another independent country.

This kind of ethnic politics is already taking place in Britain where Bradford and Tower Hamlets have become Muslim republics and Birmingham and Manchester, amongst other towns and regions, are on the way. This is not fantasy. This is political reality. This is not about freedom of speech; this is not about integration; this is about pure and simple occupation in the name of Islam.

When it became known that the official Labour Party had suspicions about Ruftur Rahman’s involvement with Muslim extremists, Ruftur Rahman was expelled by the Labour Party but it was to no avail and now Tower Hamlets is to all intents and purposes a political platform to promote interests that are not British interests. It does not surprise that those who came out to support Ruftur Rahman were Ken Livingstone and George Galloway (one a political maverick of the left and the other a former Labour Party MP, but both supporters of Muslim extremists). When George Galloway needed to run a campaign to re-enter Parliament he went straight to Bradford because he needed to run a campaign based on ethnic politics.

I am sure that the Islamic issue is a fundamental issue of debate within the Conservative Party, despite the public pandering to Muslims carried out by Prime Minister David Cameron. Baroness Warsi, now former Co-Chairman of the Conservative Party, was an attempt to show an example of inclusiveness that to all effects became a political embarrassment.

Simon Hughes MP, Deputy Lib Dem leader, has also gone out of his way to try and engage Muslim communities, regardless of his self-confessed homosexuality that puts him at odds with many of the precepts of those he tries to engage with. Not long ago, Muslim activists deployed signs in Tower Hamlets declaring Tower Hamlets a gay-free-area.

In religious terms, we have reached a scandalous dimension by having the BBC appointing a Muslim as Head of Religious Programming and an Archbishop of Canterbury talking about the acceptability of Sharia Law in the United Kingdom.

Despite all the official and unofficial subservient attempts to please Muslim Communities, you have media like Press TV openly accusing Britain of being anti-Muslim and racist and Muslim activists roaming the streets of Britain attacking the British Armed Forces.

People like Abu Hamsa, that just a few months ago was plotting against our freedoms, is now about to be sent to the United States of America, but this didn’t happen before more than 4 million pound were spent in legal cases plus all added extras for the sake of human rights that he blatantly denounced as depravity of the Western World.

Britain as a country has been extremely tolerant and accepting to the point of accepting what is utterly unacceptable and it is still dragging its feet, avoiding what should have been done a long time ago. You either support the laws of Britain or you support the laws of Islam. The Fatwa is one of the clearest examples to show that Islam is not compatible with our religious and political freedoms. The Fatwa is nothing more than a murder contract. If you are Christian, if you are Jewish or a follower of other religions, nobody is going to issue a murder contract against you because you criticize your own faith.

As a Christian I am absolutely free to criticize Christianity without being persecuted. The ones rallying in Manchester who claimed that they were acting to protect freedom of speech were doing nothing of the sort. Fatwa, stoning, rape and other forms of violence linked to religious intolerance have nothing to do with freedom of speech and they are merely abusing the freedoms we have in order to promote their Islamic intolerance.

Captain Hook: Auld Lang Syne

Bye, bye, Captain Hook?

Abu Hamza could be soon leaving the United Kingdom in good company of other fellow travellers, heading westwards, having been cordially invited to visit the United States of America.

Captain Hook, as he is affectionately known, used to delight us with his public speeches made outside Mosques when he was not allowed to preach inside Mosques because he promoted Jihadism, a form of violent militant Islam.

The European Court of Human Rights has given its final approval for the extradition of five major terrorism suspects from the UK to the US and this includes our dear friend Abu Hamza.

Lynne Featherstone: Nudity on papers fuel violence. Oh yeah!

Lynne Featherstone: Nudity on papers fuel violence. Oh yeah!

For a prominent Lib Dem to become moralistic is a bit rich, especially when Lib Dems are expert promoters of ‘alternative ways’ and in fielding porno-producers as Prospective Members of Parliament.

I have many reasons to criticize The Sun newspaper but Page Tree Girls are not one of them. If we were to follow Lynne Featherstone, the statue of David would be wearing pants and all the nude paintings in museums would be covered with black paint and that would not make the slightest difference in the way people treat each other.

Lynne Featherstone talks about role models. Is she serious? Does she really think that the pictures of naked girls published by The Sun newspaper are really taken as role models? So what about Lib Dem policies concerning sexual relationships and marriage? Do they promote role models?

I wouldn’t say that Lynne Featherstone could be accused of being a “sour face”, unless “sour face” is the way to describe an idiot that hypocritically misrepresents the views of her own political party on sexuality. Public toilet tours, anybody? No. Perhaps you should stay home and, rather than watching Page Three Girls, you should watch movies done by a Lib Dem female porno producer.     

Press TV supports Islamophobia

Press TV supports Islamophobia

Under the headline “Fact: Britain’s dark legacy of Islamophobia”, Press TV enumerates what they see as evidence of Islamophobia, showing that Islam supports murder for religious reasons.

They start by talking about the Fatwa against Salma Rushdie who was sentenced to death by the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran Iman Khomeini for what they call insults to Islam in Salman Rushdie’s fourth novel “The Satanic Verses” that is a considered to be a literary jewel. So, it is fine for what they call the Glorious Faith to support a murder attempt ordered by a foreign religious leader and the ritual of the stoning of women about which there widespread graphic evidence. Want to talk about Human Rights?

We don’t need to rely on what Press TV calls inaccurate claims and imaginative lies about the “true divine religion of Islam”. No, we have got the evidence. Last night, a Cabinet Minister of Pakistan offered a reward to anybody who would kill the producers of a movie. This is yet another example that shows that “the divine religion of Islam supports murder for religious reasons”. What is more, the Pakistani Minister asked for the cooperation of what he calls his Islamic brothers - Taliban and alQaeda - that have a "glorius record" in the defense of human rights of men, women and children that they have gloriously tortured, raped and murdered in the name of Islam. 

Press TV also refers to Nicholas John Griffin, British National Party leader, who has been fighting against Muslim paedophile gangs that have been sent to prison for sexually abusing boys and girls after loading them with drugs and alcohol. I do assume that Press TV would also like to talk about it.

Press TV also refers to the burning of the Quran as a capital offense and an example of racism and Islmophobia. Islam not only burns books. Islam burns people alive. Let’s remember the 2001 events in the United States of America, the July 2005 events in the United Kingdom, the bombing of the railways in Spain, the blowing up of embassies across the world and the countless assassinations done in the name of Islam across the world.

The funny thing is that they use a website to write an enumeration under the headline “human rights” that rather than defining Islam as the “divine and true faith” describes Islam as a murderous ideology.

They make accusations against the British government accusing the British government of being behind “racist and anti-Islam propaganda” when racist and anti-Islam propaganda is spread by the irrational actions of Islamic leaders that are very much public knowledge.  

Pakistan: Can we trust them?

The news is that a Pakistani government minister offered 100,000 US dollars inviting people to kill those involved in the production of a film mocking Islam and invited "Taliban and alQaeda brother" to be partners is what he calls a noble deed.

Railways Minister Ghulam Ahmed Bilour made the statement in Peshawar, in Northwest Pakistan, and it comes as further evidence of that fact that Pakistan should not be trusted and even less helped with Western funds.

If there was to be a conflict involving Pakistan, can we trust Pakistanis living in Britain? This raises important issues in terms of allegiance.