Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties hypocrisy

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties' hypocrisy

Gerard Batten and Tommy Robinson

Gerard Batten's Dilemma was created by Nigel Farage when Nigel Farage - without questioning - surrendered UKIP to Political Correctness. Why? All other political parties have former BNP members, former NF members, former EDL members and even former IRA members.

The Labour Party has the highest numbers of BNP, NF and EDL former members. In fact, Jeremy Corbyn was elected and re-affirmed as Labour Party Leader with BNP, NF and EDL former members votes.

The BBC didn't look into it. SKY News didn't look into it. They just focused on UKIP to chastise UKIP for something all other political parties have done. A former IRA members represents the Conservative Party in Greater London.

Today, the House of Commons and everything around the Houses of Parliament had to do with Brexit and the votes on a series of amendments presented by both Government and Opposition. I met Gerard Batten and spoke with him about these issues directly. Why? Because the London Regional Press Office asks questions directly. I met Gerard Batten near the House of Commons and we spoke about these issues and the fact that Tommy Robinson contracted as Adviser cannot stand for election representing UKIP because he is not a member of UKIP and he is not a member of UKIP because UKIP's Membership Rules explicitly excludes former members of the BNP and of EDL. Tommy Robinson was a BNP member and was also an EDL member.

But there is another paradox. Despite the fact that officially UKIP Membership Rules exclude former members of BNP, and EDL from becoming members of UKIP, UKIP has members that were at one point in time members of BNP, NF and EDL. How did this happen? Well, those who were not publicly known members of BNP, NF and EDL existed under the radar. 

As Gerard Batten explained to me personally in a face to face conversation, UKIP introduced the said Membership Rules to avoid being infiltrated by BNP, NF and EDL and others.

Nobody knows for certain what will happen on March 29th 2019. Nobody knows what will happen before March 29th 2019. What is certain is that a group of minority parties are struggling to get the support of individuals that occupy practically the same segment of public opinion. The announcement by Nigel Farage that he wants to create a new political party doesn't help. In fact, it divides even more those who share certain political views. 

What will happen when issues like Abortion come to the fore? What will happen when they have to decide on Economic Policies or Foreign Affairs? Will minority parties maintain the same level of support they have until now? They might be united with regards to Islam or Immigration? Will they be united when it comes to a whole range of others issues that any political party has to deal with?

   

Dirty War: I was there and I saw how it was done

Dirty War: I was there and I saw how it was done

Venezuela 2019 (Oil) is a repeat of Chile 1973 (Copper) and before that it was Guatemala under Jacobo Arbenz 1954 (United Fruit). Before that was Iran 1953 when USA and UK destroyed the democratic movement in Iran and supported the Shah to get their hands on Iranian Oil. Same Mafia, same methods. They destabilise a country and provoke a gigantic political crisis. The aforementioned are not the only countries that have suffered the actions of the said Mafia.

We are on the verge of yet another military adventure that will start another bloody chapter in the history of Latin America. 

Lets rewind a little bit. I was willing part of the Dirty War that led to more than 30,000 people killed in Argentina and many more across Latin America. My orders were shoot to kill and shoot first ask questions later. We don't want White Gloves Troops for Parades. We want Black Gloves Troops for Killing. If when we give you the order to shoot you don't shoot, your mates will shoot you. 

Today, people complain about 'water boarding'(placing a towel over a person's face and throwing water on top of his or her face. It produces high anxiety and the feeling of drowning. We did a lot more than that. We connected live electricity wires to peoples bodies and especially genitals. We made people sit on ice until their organs failed and they screamed in pain because of cold burns, we tortured, drugged and threw people from aircraft flying at high altitude so that when their bodies hit the surface of the sea their faces would be disfigured making them unrecognisable. We did this and much more. All this was done as part of USA Operation Condor with full support of the US State Department and support provided by several agencies including most especially the Central Intelligence Agency.

Now, it is Venezuela's time. Another tragedy in the horizon. They will stop at nothing. They will use every dirty bloody means to get what they want.

     

Brexit: I have a plan, a plan that cannot possibly fail

Brexit: I have a plan, a plan that cannot possibly fail

L'Inspecteur May de la Sûreté Conservative

Plan B, as it followed, was Plan A under another letter mmm... name. You cannot have a Customs Union and be members of the Common Market without Freedom of Movement that incidentally was explicitly rejected. If you had Freedom of Movement it would amount to ignoring the outcome of the Referendum on EU Membership.

The SNP doesn't want Brexit. SNP wants to get out of the United Kingdom to then join the EU. Now, this amounts to selling out Scottish Independence. The Scottish Parliament would then surrender Scottish fisheries to the EU and would also surrender many of the powers given to the Scottish Parliament by the Devolution Act. Scottish Independence to then become an EU province? 

For all the talk about the Good Friday Agreement as a great achievement, the Northern Ireland Assembly has not been working for more than two years because the Sinn Fein/IRA walked away from it and asked for conditions that they perfectly know the Protestant Community will never accept. It the Sinn Fein/IRA's way of ensuring that there couldn't be proper Home Rule in Northern Ireland. They did the same in Westminster by getting elected MPs but never taking their seats in the House of Commons. The difference is that without them there still is a working Parliament of the United Kingdom as a whole while in Northern Ireland Devolution has been frozen.

This means that the Catholic Community of Northern Ireland, because of Sinn Fein/IRA, has no representation in Westminster and has no representation in the Northern Ireland Assembly. The Good Friday Agreement was violated by Sinn Fein/IRA and is no longer valid.

Most of the trade of Northern Ireland is not with the Republic of Ireland. Most of the trade of Northern Ireland is with the rest of the United Kingdom and with the rest of the World and the ports of the Republic of Ireland are merely transit ways. Even for the Republic of Ireland the United Kingdom is a major partner.

 

 

Britain: the difference between political stability and a permanent state of war is that people tend to accept the outcome of elections and referendums

Britain's Brexit: the difference between political stability and a permanent state of war is that people tend to accept the outcome of elections and referendums

When you look at certain African countries you understand that for political stability to exist people need to accept the outcome of elections and referendums. As long as the voting process is fair and transparent, whether voters like or dislike the outcome of the public consultation, life goes on peacefully under the rule of law. When soon after the election or referendum, the population refuses to accept the outcome of the public consultation there will be riots possibly leading to civil war and assassinations and an entire country will be in a constant state of flux.

Many people in the United Kingdom that blatantly refuse to accept the outcome of the Referendum on EU Membership should take a closer look at what happens when the outcome of a perfectly legal public consultation is rejected or ignored by those who are supposed to respect the outcome of a public consultation. Do they want Britain to be in a permanent state of flux? Do they want widespread violence in the United Kingdom?

If as reported, the Army is sent to deal with the civilian population, what do you think the consequences will be if as presumed people get injured or even killed on British streets? Would this be conducive to political stability and peaceful coexistence?

For a very long time, there hasn't been a civil war in Britain but people should be reminded that the fact that there hasn't been a civil war does not mean that there couldn't be civil war in the not so distant future. London is not Britain. Scotland is not Britain. They are parts of Britain. This is not about what London wants or Scotland wants. It is about what Britain as a whole wants.

Question Time and Diane Abbot: Lack of definitions?

Question Time and Dianne Abbot: Lack of definitions?

Diane Abbott MP

First and foremost, this is not just about Diane Abbott. Yes, she felt that she was unduly treated, but the essence of the problem is the lack of well defined answers. Given the lack of precise answers, people get exasperated. Merely attacking Prime Minister Theresa May without specifically saying what are the alternatives proposed or what exactly the Labour Party is willing to compromise on will generate exasperation.

The Conservative representative explained the situation with absolute clarity. If you want a deal that can be agreed by a sizeable majority, Members of Parliament will have to express in writing what they are willing to accept.

The Scottish National Party put it very clearly. The SNP doesn't want any deal. All SNP wants is to remain in the European Union. Therefore, they will never agree on any deal. If you say that Immigration and Freedom of Movement is non negotiable then those who oppose Immigration and Freedom of Movement and those who want Immigration and Freedom of Movement will not be able to agree because the two positions are incompatible.

If you want a Customs Union and a Common Market you have to live under EU Regulations and therefore you will not be able to negotiate independent agreements with other countries outside the EU. Moreover, having a Customs Union and a Common Market means having to accept Immigration and Freedom of Movement that are sine qua non requirements of the European Union.

No Deal is the default option and the logical option. With No Deal you don't have a Customs Union and a Common Market and you are able to sign up bilateral deals that will suit your particular circumstances and you are able to control immigration flows. 

There was always immigration of one kind or another long before there was an European Union. People have been able to move around and go from one country into another as long as they met the minimum requirement for entry. Will Britain stop accepting immigrants when Britain leaves the European Union? Of course not.  

Many Members of Parliament and not only Diane Abbott find themselves unable to provide precise answers. Despite talking about a Deal, the Liberal Democrats don't want any deal. All they want is to stay in the European Union. Those who say that they want a Common Market and a Customs Union are actually saying that they want to stay in the European Union.

Delays are just a way of playing for time with the hope of getting rid of Brexit and this is why those who want to remain are constantly talking about extensions. 

Does the Leave Means Leave Campaign want peoples' support? Really?

Does the Leave Means Leave Campaign want peoples' support? Really?

I bought a ticket, I received the ticket by email and later on during the same evening I got another email cancelling the ticket and telling me that I violated the terms and conditions of Leave Means Leave (this was going to be my first event) and that I had been banned from attending any future events. I asked for an explanation and none was provided. By the way, there are five votes in my household. Do they want our votes? Really? If a second referendum takes place, should we support Leave Means Leave? Mmmmm....... we might have to think very hard about it. The behaviour of Leave Means Leave is contemptible.

Germany: The victims are those called Far Right attacked by Left Wing Criminals

Germany: The victims are those called Far Right attacked by Left Wing Criminals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r77mWSY4e0w

The Political Establishment and the mass media want you to believe that those called Far Right are monsters when in fact it is exactly the opposite. Left Wing Criminals are regularly attacking those called Far Right and destroying political headquarters of so called Far Right parties who are legal organisations taking part in the legal and democratic life in Germany.