Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties hypocrisy

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties' hypocrisy

Gerard Batten and Tommy Robinson

Gerard Batten's Dilemma was created by Nigel Farage when Nigel Farage - without questioning - surrendered UKIP to Political Correctness. Why? All other political parties have former BNP members, former NF members, former EDL members and even former IRA members.

The Labour Party has the highest numbers of BNP, NF and EDL former members. In fact, Jeremy Corbyn was elected and re-affirmed as Labour Party Leader with BNP, NF and EDL former members votes.

The BBC didn't look into it. SKY News didn't look into it. They just focused on UKIP to chastise UKIP for something all other political parties have done. A former IRA members represents the Conservative Party in Greater London.

Today, the House of Commons and everything around the Houses of Parliament had to do with Brexit and the votes on a series of amendments presented by both Government and Opposition. I met Gerard Batten and spoke with him about these issues directly. Why? Because the London Regional Press Office asks questions directly. I met Gerard Batten near the House of Commons and we spoke about these issues and the fact that Tommy Robinson contracted as Adviser cannot stand for election representing UKIP because he is not a member of UKIP and he is not a member of UKIP because UKIP's Membership Rules explicitly excludes former members of the BNP and of EDL. Tommy Robinson was a BNP member and was also an EDL member.

But there is another paradox. Despite the fact that officially UKIP Membership Rules exclude former members of BNP, and EDL from becoming members of UKIP, UKIP has members that were at one point in time members of BNP, NF and EDL. How did this happen? Well, those who were not publicly known members of BNP, NF and EDL existed under the radar. 

As Gerard Batten explained to me personally in a face to face conversation, UKIP introduced the said Membership Rules to avoid being infiltrated by BNP, NF and EDL and others.

Nobody knows for certain what will happen on March 29th 2019. Nobody knows what will happen before March 29th 2019. What is certain is that a group of minority parties are struggling to get the support of individuals that occupy practically the same segment of public opinion. The announcement by Nigel Farage that he wants to create a new political party doesn't help. In fact, it divides even more those who share certain political views. 

What will happen when issues like Abortion come to the fore? What will happen when they have to decide on Economic Policies or Foreign Affairs? Will minority parties maintain the same level of support they have until now? They might be united with regards to Islam or Immigration? Will they be united when it comes to a whole range of others issues that any political party has to deal with?

   

Dirty War: I was there and I saw how it was done

Dirty War: I was there and I saw how it was done

Venezuela 2019 (Oil) is a repeat of Chile 1973 (Copper) and before that it was Guatemala under Jacobo Arbenz 1954 (United Fruit). Before that was Iran 1953 when USA and UK destroyed the democratic movement in Iran and supported the Shah to get their hands on Iranian Oil. Same Mafia, same methods. They destabilise a country and provoke a gigantic political crisis. The aforementioned are not the only countries that have suffered the actions of the said Mafia.

We are on the verge of yet another military adventure that will start another bloody chapter in the history of Latin America. 

Lets rewind a little bit. I was willing part of the Dirty War that led to more than 30,000 people killed in Argentina and many more across Latin America. My orders were shoot to kill and shoot first ask questions later. We don't want White Gloves Troops for Parades. We want Black Gloves Troops for Killing. If when we give you the order to shoot you don't shoot, your mates will shoot you. 

Today, people complain about 'water boarding'(placing a towel over a person's face and throwing water on top of his or her face. It produces high anxiety and the feeling of drowning. We did a lot more than that. We connected live electricity wires to peoples bodies and especially genitals. We made people sit on ice until their organs failed and they screamed in pain because of cold burns, we tortured, drugged and threw people from aircraft flying at high altitude so that when their bodies hit the surface of the sea their faces would be disfigured making them unrecognisable. We did this and much more. All this was done as part of USA Operation Condor with full support of the US State Department and support provided by several agencies including most especially the Central Intelligence Agency.

Now, it is Venezuela's time. Another tragedy in the horizon. They will stop at nothing. They will use every dirty bloody means to get what they want.

     

Brexit: I have a plan, a plan that cannot possibly fail

Brexit: I have a plan, a plan that cannot possibly fail

L'Inspecteur May de la Sûreté Conservative

Plan B, as it followed, was Plan A under another letter mmm... name. You cannot have a Customs Union and be members of the Common Market without Freedom of Movement that incidentally was explicitly rejected. If you had Freedom of Movement it would amount to ignoring the outcome of the Referendum on EU Membership.

The SNP doesn't want Brexit. SNP wants to get out of the United Kingdom to then join the EU. Now, this amounts to selling out Scottish Independence. The Scottish Parliament would then surrender Scottish fisheries to the EU and would also surrender many of the powers given to the Scottish Parliament by the Devolution Act. Scottish Independence to then become an EU province? 

For all the talk about the Good Friday Agreement as a great achievement, the Northern Ireland Assembly has not been working for more than two years because the Sinn Fein/IRA walked away from it and asked for conditions that they perfectly know the Protestant Community will never accept. It the Sinn Fein/IRA's way of ensuring that there couldn't be proper Home Rule in Northern Ireland. They did the same in Westminster by getting elected MPs but never taking their seats in the House of Commons. The difference is that without them there still is a working Parliament of the United Kingdom as a whole while in Northern Ireland Devolution has been frozen.

This means that the Catholic Community of Northern Ireland, because of Sinn Fein/IRA, has no representation in Westminster and has no representation in the Northern Ireland Assembly. The Good Friday Agreement was violated by Sinn Fein/IRA and is no longer valid.

Most of the trade of Northern Ireland is not with the Republic of Ireland. Most of the trade of Northern Ireland is with the rest of the United Kingdom and with the rest of the World and the ports of the Republic of Ireland are merely transit ways. Even for the Republic of Ireland the United Kingdom is a major partner.

 

 

Britain: the difference between political stability and a permanent state of war is that people tend to accept the outcome of elections and referendums

Britain's Brexit: the difference between political stability and a permanent state of war is that people tend to accept the outcome of elections and referendums

When you look at certain African countries you understand that for political stability to exist people need to accept the outcome of elections and referendums. As long as the voting process is fair and transparent, whether voters like or dislike the outcome of the public consultation, life goes on peacefully under the rule of law. When soon after the election or referendum, the population refuses to accept the outcome of the public consultation there will be riots possibly leading to civil war and assassinations and an entire country will be in a constant state of flux.

Many people in the United Kingdom that blatantly refuse to accept the outcome of the Referendum on EU Membership should take a closer look at what happens when the outcome of a perfectly legal public consultation is rejected or ignored by those who are supposed to respect the outcome of a public consultation. Do they want Britain to be in a permanent state of flux? Do they want widespread violence in the United Kingdom?

If as reported, the Army is sent to deal with the civilian population, what do you think the consequences will be if as presumed people get injured or even killed on British streets? Would this be conducive to political stability and peaceful coexistence?

For a very long time, there hasn't been a civil war in Britain but people should be reminded that the fact that there hasn't been a civil war does not mean that there couldn't be civil war in the not so distant future. London is not Britain. Scotland is not Britain. They are parts of Britain. This is not about what London wants or Scotland wants. It is about what Britain as a whole wants.

Question Time and Diane Abbot: Lack of definitions?

Question Time and Dianne Abbot: Lack of definitions?

Diane Abbott MP

First and foremost, this is not just about Diane Abbott. Yes, she felt that she was unduly treated, but the essence of the problem is the lack of well defined answers. Given the lack of precise answers, people get exasperated. Merely attacking Prime Minister Theresa May without specifically saying what are the alternatives proposed or what exactly the Labour Party is willing to compromise on will generate exasperation.

The Conservative representative explained the situation with absolute clarity. If you want a deal that can be agreed by a sizeable majority, Members of Parliament will have to express in writing what they are willing to accept.

The Scottish National Party put it very clearly. The SNP doesn't want any deal. All SNP wants is to remain in the European Union. Therefore, they will never agree on any deal. If you say that Immigration and Freedom of Movement is non negotiable then those who oppose Immigration and Freedom of Movement and those who want Immigration and Freedom of Movement will not be able to agree because the two positions are incompatible.

If you want a Customs Union and a Common Market you have to live under EU Regulations and therefore you will not be able to negotiate independent agreements with other countries outside the EU. Moreover, having a Customs Union and a Common Market means having to accept Immigration and Freedom of Movement that are sine qua non requirements of the European Union.

No Deal is the default option and the logical option. With No Deal you don't have a Customs Union and a Common Market and you are able to sign up bilateral deals that will suit your particular circumstances and you are able to control immigration flows. 

There was always immigration of one kind or another long before there was an European Union. People have been able to move around and go from one country into another as long as they met the minimum requirement for entry. Will Britain stop accepting immigrants when Britain leaves the European Union? Of course not.  

Many Members of Parliament and not only Diane Abbott find themselves unable to provide precise answers. Despite talking about a Deal, the Liberal Democrats don't want any deal. All they want is to stay in the European Union. Those who say that they want a Common Market and a Customs Union are actually saying that they want to stay in the European Union.

Delays are just a way of playing for time with the hope of getting rid of Brexit and this is why those who want to remain are constantly talking about extensions. 

Does the Leave Means Leave Campaign want peoples' support? Really?

Does the Leave Means Leave Campaign want peoples' support? Really?

I bought a ticket, I received the ticket by email and later on during the same evening I got another email cancelling the ticket and telling me that I violated the terms and conditions of Leave Means Leave (this was going to be my first event) and that I had been banned from attending any future events. I asked for an explanation and none was provided. By the way, there are five votes in my household. Do they want our votes? Really? If a second referendum takes place, should we support Leave Means Leave? Mmmmm....... we might have to think very hard about it. The behaviour of Leave Means Leave is contemptible.

Germany: The victims are those called Far Right attacked by Left Wing Criminals

Germany: The victims are those called Far Right attacked by Left Wing Criminals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r77mWSY4e0w

The Political Establishment and the mass media want you to believe that those called Far Right are monsters when in fact it is exactly the opposite. Left Wing Criminals are regularly attacking those called Far Right and destroying political headquarters of so called Far Right parties who are legal organisations taking part in the legal and democratic life in Germany.

Attacks against political parties and political party members have been blessed by the Political Establishment

Attacks against political parties and political party members have been blessed by the Political Establishment

Owen Jones (The Guardian) - Anna Soubry MP

Both Owen Jones and Anna Soubry MP promoted and celebrated attacks against political parties and political party members.

Owen Jones actively supports thugs that engage in political violence and his writings are not conducive to peaceful political coexistence but since the National Union of Journalist has an active agenda that leads to persecution discrimination, harassment and violence this doesn't come as a surprise. 

It remains to be seen if the aforementioned would remember what happened in 1930s Germany and perhaps learnt a few lessons from it because the kind of realities that they promote are certainly leading Britain to become 1930s Germany, especially when nowadays political violence in Germany is on the rise and Britain will soon become a reflection of it. They both lamented the death of Jo Cox MP but they don't seem to understand that their behaviour is putting people in danger.

If we don't respect each other and if we don't care for each other, regardless of our political differences, Britain will be the new Weimar Republic.  

Simon Darby offers his account of an event during which Owen Jones was filmed celebrating political violence.

"Since the College Green assault on the BNP’s newly elected MEPs in 2009 has come in to focus, I’ll share a few recollections of the event. I do so for the purpose of making people aware of the increasingly desperate manoeuvres by the power structure in this country, approaching March 29th, to officially reclassify some 17.4 million people as far-right extremists.

Tuesday 9th June 2009 just a couple of days after the BNP’s incredible breakthrough in the European elections and it was my job to sort out a press conference. Having myself obtained 122,000 votes (8.6%) across the West Midlands I was somewhat disappointed not to be on the podium, but the show had to go on.

It was my idea to host the event at College Green, right outside Parliament, since whilst working at the GLA I had done a number of interviews from that same location. I found it to be secure, most of the time crawling with police and easily accessible to the world’s press. More than this though, with Parliament in the background any images would tend to visually turbocharge our breakthrough and help cement the achievement in the public’s mind.

Both Nick and Andrew were happy with the idea, but BNP security were concerned about the complexities of operating in London. Far from “BNP Thugs” our security team was a highly disciplined, politically savvy synthesis of ex-military, martial arts experts and doormen from some of the roughest cities and towns across the UK.

Those initial concerns were alleviated by the use of special forces grade communications equipment allowing extraction vehicles to be in close orbit to the event at all times away from the prying eyes and ears of the boys in blue. That proved to be a very wise move with this particular choice of winners enclosure.

All progressed smoothly enough at first, I was pleased with the size of the snarling press pack I had conjured up knowing we would not be wasting our time. Then all of a sudden I heard chants and out of the corner of my eye I saw a hundred strong herd of far-left zombies was shuffling towards us.

I don’t need to say what happened next as the attack has been seen by most. There are however photos of myself at the event with a look of shock on my face almost as if I’m smiling. How on earth, in one of the tightest security zones in the country, do a mob of one hundred assailants at first assemble, then walk unhindered, right outside Westminster, to deliver a sustained uninterrupted ten minute assault on democratically elected MPs?

It goes without saying that the far left and the media, if there is a difference, co-operate to facilitate violent intimidation. BBC and Channel 4 get the money shot and the left alienate support amongst the middle classes and delegitimise our message. However, in the College Green case the only conclusion you could draw was that certain elements within the police were playing the game too. It was a pattern repeated often over the next few years.

As for the attack itself I remember the bizarre giant rugby scrum that ensued, moving with a momentum and shape akin to the Great Red Spot on Jupiter and the Andromeda Galaxy. Thanks to security nobody was hurt, although I did feel sorry for young Jay from Essex. Attached closely to Nick he continued to take blows whilst protecting him, resisting the obvious urge to retaliate which he was capable of doing most effectively.

As is nearly always the case with left wing violence against nationalists, nobody gets charged. My local police took it all very seriously, but the Met conveniently mislaid the file. In fact the only person they pursued with interest was one of our security team who extracted us with his expert defensive driving. Maybe they wanted to recruit him.

What “robust action” the police will take against people ”harassing” the likes of Anna Soubry and Owen Jones is unknown. However I can tell you for sure that ANTIFA and other violent leftist groups will not be classified as domestic terrorists. Their members will not be charged with belonging to an illegal organisation. Their organisers, journalists and serving police officers will not be arrested for conspiracy to incite violent disorder. Union backers will not have their funds seized under anti-terrorist legislation and The Electoral Commission will not be disbanded for allowing violence and intimidation to undermine our democratic system for decades. If they were merely football hooligans, well that would be a very different matter."

The use of the words Nazi and Fascist is not news

The use of the words Nazi and Fascist is not news

|Anne Soubry MP

Much has been said about the fact that a demonstrator told Anne Subry MP 'you are a Nazi'. 

Anne Soubry should be comforted by the fact the Labour Party followers and representatives, Liberal Democratic Party followers and their representatives, Green Party members and their representatives, trade union members and their representatives, et cetera, et cetera, call members of the United Kingdom Independence Party and their representatives Nazi and Fascist.

In fact, they tend to call Nazi and Fascist anyone that they disagree with.

Non only that, those associated with the aforementioned have physically attacked those that they call Nazi and Fascist.

The UAF (official name United against Fascism) and that I call "United against Freedom" that many MPs fully support periodically engages in name calling exercises and hostile acts leading to violence and bodily harm.

The mass media eagerly cooperate in the demonising of political representatives including those linked to UKIP  but UKIP itself has been found wanting when, across the board, banned anybody who at one point in time was a member of other organisations also categorised as Nazi and Fascist.

Coming from Members of Parliament the over-reaction is nothing more than yet another example of sheer hypocrisy because the environment of hatred has been promoted by Members of Parliament who led to the name calling culture and discrimination against those they don't like or do not agree with.

In today's Britain, people who have been/were  members of certain legal political organisations are banned from employment in certain branches of public organisations and those who having been employed for a certain time are found to have been members of the said legal political organisations face the sack and not just from employment in the public sector. 

Not long ago, Richard Barnbrook, former Labour Party Member, who joined the British National Party and was elected London Assembly Member, was told by authorities of a well-known English University that despite his knowledge and credentials he was going to be rejected because of his political background.

Political discrimination exists in the United Kingdom and it has been deemed acceptable by Members of Parliament like Anne Soubry. Therefore, she should search her own conscience to see that she is just suffering the consequences of what Members of Parliament like herself have promoted.

Just hours ago, in Germany, a representative of Alternative für Deutschland was brutally attacked by a gang of the German equivalent of the UAF, and headquarters of Alternative für Deutschland have been the targets of politically motivated attacks. This is the direct consequence of intolerance promoted by so called mainstream political parties and politicians for whom the ends justify the means. They are eager to justify such attacks but then cry foul when they - the original perpetrators - are targeted.    

List of Members of Parliament and former Members of Parliament that were founding signatories of the United Against Fascism organisation: 

Ken Livingstone, Tony Benn, Peter Hain MP, David Hanson MP, Adam Price MP, Barbara Follett MP, Diane Abbott MP, John Cryer MP, John Trickett MP, Keith Vaz MP, Peter Bottomley MP, Alice Mahon MP, Alan Meale MP, Ian Gibson MP, Sir Teddy Taylor MP, Harry Cohen MP, Betty Williams MP, Ken Purchase MP, Laura Moffatt MP, Peter Bradley MP, Vera Baird MP, Bill Etherington MP, Edward Garnier MP, Roger Berry MP, Angela Smith MP, Brian Iddon MP, Anthony Steen MP, Mike Hancock MP, Colin Pickthall MP, Clive Betts MP, Janet Anderson MP, Neil Gerrard MP, Jane Griffiths MP, Brian Donohue MP, Helen Clark MP, Terry Davis MP, Janet Dean MP, Adrian Bailey MP, David Cameron MP, Louise Ellman MP, Eric Illsley MP, Kelvin Hopkins MP, Ernie Ross MP, Rob Marris MP, Martin Caton MP, Jim Sheridan MP, Martin Jones MP, Paul Tyler MP, Colin Challen MP, David Wright MP, Rudi Vis MP, Tony Worthington MP, Derek Watts MP, Julie Morgan MP, Rev W Martin Smyth MP, Diana Organ MP, Doug Henderson MP, Barry Gardiner MP

Alternative für Deutschland Representative seriously beaten in politically motivated attack

Alternative für Deutschland Representative seriously beaten in politically motivated attack

If other political parties say that this is acceptable they must be willing to pay the ultimate price.

This is Germany today and more and more Germans understand that the so called Antifa are the real extremists.

Liberals and Left-Wing have returned Germany to the 1930s and they will have to deal with the consequences.

This could end up being murder, political murder, carried out by Antifa. This is the real face of Antifa, a bunch of criminals with intent to murder those who dare to have a different point of view. He was attacked by the German UAF, the German Hope Not Hate, the creepy crawlies that go around terrorising people they don't agree with.

After 50 years, what has the UK National Front actually achieved?

National Front: Fifty years in politics? For what? A Parish Council Seat?

The best way of looking at any piece of political writing is to focus on the details and Richard Edmonds gives plenty of details to show that the National Front was, is and will be a spent force in British Politics.

He says and we quote:

The National Front was founded fifty years ago by far-seeing men and women who knew then that the clowns and traitors at Westminster were leading our nation to its ruin. Friends, if we remain true and brave and stick to our nationalist principles, we can yet win through.

Fifty years of what? The National Front never won any election apart from having a seat in a Parish Council. This is the political organisation that says that "we can win through". You only need to check the numbers registered by the Electoral Commission of every election in the United Kingdom where the National Front ever stood. He also talks about standing for nationalist principles but, as it is often the case, is short in terms of definitions that could get the organisation in very deep waters from a legal standpoint.

With all due respect, Richard Edmonds has been NF then BNP then NF et cetera on an ongoing basis, having turned against the BNP in the throws of a Mayoral Campaign. Not much regard for fellow activists that with enormous sacrifices put their lives on the firing line.

For many years, Richards Edmonds and others had a grudge against the now former Leader of the British National Party Nick Griffin who deposed the previous leader John Tyndall. Now, let's look at the facts.  

Nick Griffin

John Tyndall

 

You can draw your own conclusions about the kind of "British Nationalism" the National Front stands for and can certainly draw your own conclusions about why certain individuals did their worst to undermine Nick Griffin's leadership from the very beginning in spite of the fact that Nick Griffin brought about electoral successes that those guided by John Tyndall could only dream about. Why? Look at the images. I reckon the images are graphic enough to explain why.

Here is another quote: 

Meantime Nigel Farage’s multi-racial, civic-nationalist UKIP is now minus Farage and in the hands of Tommy -“I love Israel” – Robinson. True patriots have not forgotten that Israel was spawned in the blood of British soldiers murdered by Jewish terrorists in Palestine at the end of the Second World war. 

Richard Edmonds remains a faithful of racial discrimination attacking Nigel Farage of "the "multi-racial and civic-nationalist UKIP". He goes on talking about Jewish terrorists in Palestine fighting for the creation of the State of Israel.

The State of Israel was not spawned on the blood of Jewish terrorists. Let's look at the facts. During World War I, there was the Balfour Declaration - a public statement made by the British government in 1917 (long before World War Two) announcing support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. This happened when Palestine was still a region of the Ottoman Empire. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Palestine became the British Mandate for Palestine on 29 September 1923 and lasted until 15 May 1948, year in which the State of Israel was officially established. 

Judging by events and concepts, Richard Edmonds would perhaps refer to the Colonials of 1776 that led to the creation of the United States of America as "American Terrorists". Personally, I wouldn't tell an American Citizen today that according to Richard Edmonds criteria George Washington would be a Terrorist. Many years afterwards, the country they created came to the rescue of the United Kingdom in its hour of need. 

A bit of historical enlightenment would also show that the  French of Napoleon Bonaparte that Admiral Horatio Nelson defeated at Trafalgar and the Duke of Wellington defeated at Waterloo were not the French of Charles de Gaulle.

It seems that facts matter very little when the aim is to make a point to justify deeply rooted beliefs, beliefs that led to the rise of National Action - an organisation proscribed for its openly anti-Semitic stances. Empty slogans and massive over-generalisation lead to discrimination and violence.

If after 50 years of militancy this is the kind of politics that can be produced, electoral success will remain forever elusive.

We don't launch personal attacks. We look at what has been said and/or written. The quotes and factual historical information are in the public domain.

The Electoral Records of National Front are in the public domain and have been published by the Electoral Commission. We reproduce the New Year Message that we have quoted. Graphic images are also in the public domain. 

"A New Years Message From Richard Edmonds and the National Front

Friends, members and supporters, it gives us great satisfaction to announce that we are witnessing the collapse of the hateful, anti-British Establishment. Before our very eyes, all the political enemies, the failures, the duds, the traitors, all those with malice and hatred in their hearts, they are all coming to a sticky and final end: just as we knew that they would.

The British National party is now finished, dead, destroyed by unprincipled money-grabbers and charlatans.  Meantime Nigel Farage’s multi-racial, civic-nationalist UKIP is now minus Farage and in the hands of Tommy -“I love Israel” – Robinson. True patriots have not forgotten that Israel was spawned in the blood of British soldiers murdered by Jewish terrorists in Palestine at the end of the Second World war. Meantime we all witness at Westminster the “Honourable members” lining up to stick the knife into prime minister, Theresa -“Running scared” – May. (Today’s press headline as this article is being written). The question is, whether Theresa May will still be prime minster on New Year’s day ? Friends, with the collapse of her government we are witnessing political Justice. For decades the Tories have lied to the British people at every election and on every occasion, and now the BREXIT vote has found them out. Will May or which ever Tory con-man replaces her organise the Exit from the hated European Union which we voted for ? Don’t hold your breath: you know that the Tories ALWAYS lie, and they are not going to be different this time. A leopard does not change its spots, and the fact is that Tories’ first and only loyalty is to the finance houses of City of London and to no-one else. Probably before much longer this country will be groaning under the Marxist rule of prime minister Corbyn and his chums; and this Left-wing nightmare will be what May and her government by their betrayal of the BREXIT vote will have bequeathed the nation. And the nation will not forget and not forgive. So, brace yourselves for what is coming.

The National Front was founded fifty years ago by far-seeing men and women who knew then that the clowns and traitors at Westminster were leading our nation to its ruin. Friends, if we remain true and brave and stick to our nationalist principles, we can yet win through.

Long live the National Front."