The longer the conflict lasts, the greater the danger of nuclear war

 

The longer the conflict lasts, the greater the chances of the unthinkable happening. In 1945, President Truman decided to use atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to shorten the war and prevent a rising number of American casualties should American forces have to fight on Japanese soil where stiff resistance was expected. It was also a political statement for the then Soviet Union and to prevent a Soviet attack against Japan.

In 2022, the presence of nuclear devices is supposed to be a deterrent,but there is always a 'what if...' scenario in which the parties might decide to use nuclear devices. In 2020, NATO carried out military exercises 'to prepare for nuclear war'. If you prepare for something, you anticipate that it might come the time when it will actually happen. If it were to happen, it would open a whole series of new possibilities. One thing is combat with conventional forces and quite another is a scenario in which weapons that are much power powerful than the atomic devices used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki are detonated in Europe and elsewhere. What would trigger the use of nuclear devices? Would there be a preemptive attack? Who will make the first move? If there is an attack going one way, it is going to be immediately followed by an attack going in the opposite way.

If we can imagine the commotion created by the bombs thrown in Japan decades ago, it is not difficult to foresee the commotion today if nuclear bombs were to fall destroying capital cities. In order to understand what would be the prevailing mentality, we need to remember what happened in World War Two. If any of the parties had had such bombs earlier during the conflict would they have hesitated? If instead of sending bombing crews one after another to be shot down, if instead of sending U-boots to be sunk, the parties had had nuclear bombs to wipe out any armed resistance, to destroy every industrial capability, in one go, what would they have done?

Think about D-Day. If the allies had had the choice of using nuclear bombs instead of sending hundreds of thousands of men across the sea, many of whom lost their lives before reaching France, would they have they used nuclear bombs instead? If instead of loading V1s and V2s with conventional explosives Germany had had nuclear devices to put an end to the war in one go, would Germany have used nuclear bombs instead of conventional forces? The reason heavy water installations were bombed by the allies was that they did not want Germany to develop atomic devices. If Germany had had atomic bombs, would the Soviets have reached Germany? 

Now, coming back to today's realities. If there is the scenario in which it is foreseen that millions of troops would lose their lives in combat, would any of the parties choose to use nuclear weapons instead of suffering heavy casualties at the front? Why does Israel have nuclear devices? Why do Pakistan and India have nuclear devices? Why does Britain have nuclear devices? Why does anybody want to have nuclear devices? The reason is pretty obvious. 

What is the danger of economic sanctions? What was the danger of the American oil embargo against Japan before Japan attacked Pearl Harbour? If you push a country towards the wall, somebody might decide that if there are no economic benefits then war is a preferred option. Japan was becoming an industrial power in Asia and needed oil. This is why Japan decided to attack Pearl Harbour, to attack the one country that had limited Japan's chances to achieve economic development. The economy was the core issue that led Japan to attack the USA. 

President Putin's immediate reaction to the mention of further economic measures was to put the Armed Forces on alert. If the so called West is genuine, if the USA is genuine, in terms of favouring a peaceful outcome to put an end to the conflict, putting up pressure is not the right answer. If it is believed that the only way forward is nuclear war, the entire world loses.

Sir Roger Gale's impersonation of Adolf Hitler

 

Sir Roger Gale MP, Conservative Member of Parliament, stated on radio that 'all Russians living in the UK should be deported to send a message to President Putin'. This happened after Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaking in the House of Commons repeatedly tried to reassure Russian citizens in the UK that the actions of the British government were not aimed at Russian citizens living in the UK, but against the Russian government.

It beggars belief that a Conservative Member of Parliament could make such a racist and xenophobic statement talking not in the House of Commons but on Talk Radio. The statement is very public and is very much in the public domain and I don't think that such statement favours the public image of the Conservative Party.

At a time when tensions are rising, the statement made by Sir Roger Gale MP could be construed as Incitement to Racial Hatred and he would not be protected because what he said was said outside the Houses of Parliament. 

America: Lying to iself and lying to the world.

The USA is an expert in lying to the world and lying to itself. Regardless of a Civil War and of the Declaration of Emancipation, a war supposedly fought to free black slaves and promote equality on the basis that All men are created Equal and have therefore intrinsically the same rights, many decades after the Civil War in the 1960s the Civil Rights movement went to the streets and after a march the crowds assembled near the Abraham Lincoln Memorial to, once again, ponder about racial inequalities. The long forgotten Native Americans were followed by other minorities, minorities that are minorities on the streets, but are majorities in the vast American system of prisons spread across the USA. The prison system is the USA is a business.

In a country that is considered to be the main power in the world, economic inequalities when it comes to race are appalling and is even more appalling that despite vast resources, the United States of America does not have a National Health Service that covers all of its citizens, the same citizens that throughout the years have given their lives in many international conflicts. Don’t wait for the said issues to be resolved any time soon as both Republicans and Democrats share the blame for such scandal that blemishes the United of America.

The same country that purports itself as defender of democracy and equality is extremely undemocratic and suffers from enormous inequalities. When it comes to International Law, the USA is not even signatory of the International Court of Justice. So here we are. USA claims to be there to protect International Law and is not even signatory of the International Court of Justice.

For ever and ever, the USA has told everybody else to live within their means. Does the USA live within its means. We have become accustomed to Congress having to pass legislation after legislation to increase public debt and it continues to borrow and print banknotes as if there was no tomorrow to finance all kinds of military adventures that often end up in disaster for the USA and for all those affected by the USA. The first lesson in morality should be for the USA to live within its means and spend its resources to improve the wellbeing of American citizens without getting involved in any more military adventures.

Gennady Timchenko: Légion d'Honneur (Chevalier) targetted by British government

 

Gennady Timchenko is not only a rich man. He is also a holder of the French Légion d'Honneur (Chevalier) , one of the highest French decorations for both military and civilians merits.

This is one of three men mentioned in a communique issued by Downing Street.

The motto of the Legion d'Honneur is Honour and Country.

This shows in which direction the wind is blowing. 

I hearby say that I fully support the Russian Federation and the actions taken gy the Government and Parliament of the Russian Federation to deal with the consequences of the decisions of the mafia that has taken hold of the Government of the United States of America.

I fully support Gennady Timchenko and all those affected by measures imposed by Downing Street.

Once again Britain is being used as toilet paper and second fiddle for yet another American miltary adventure.

Karl Gerhardt HOHENSTAUFFEN

After months of US warmongering in support ot Bandera groups, the Russian Federation recognizes Donetsk and Luhansk

 

After months of US warmongering in support of Bandera groups, the Russian Federation recognizes Donetsk and Luhansk to prevent another Srebrenica. From now on, citizens of Donetsk and Luhansk will be able to have Russian passports. 

Any attacks against Russian citizens is an attack against the Russian Federation. British authorities are using anti-terror legislation for political purposes and this was the reason why Paul Golding was the target of entrapment at Heathrow Airport on his return from the Russian Federation after he was invited to go to the Parliament of the Russian Federation and to meet authorities of the Liberal Democratic Party of the Russian Federation in Moscow.

The British government falsely accused Andrei Lugovoi, elected representative of the Russian people of having killed Alexander Litvinenko when in fact Andrei Lugovoi came with an offer of safe passage back to the Russian Federation for Alexander Litvinenko and his family to make the position of Boris Berezovsky untenable and it must be remembered that Boris Berezovsky - a CIA asset - was helping Muslim extremists in Chechnya, allied to AlQaeda at the time when British troops were involved in fighting in Afghanistan.

Alexander Litvinenko was killed by British agents to protect Boris Berezosky and later on Boris Berezovsky himself was killed by British agents when he ceased to be an asset and became a dangerous embarrassment for British authorities. The assassination of Alexander Litvinenko was a British cover up and so was the murder of Boris Berezovsky. 

So now remember. An attack against Russian citizens in Donetsk and in Luhansk is an attack against the Russian Federation.

Russian Ambassador in Sweden told things as they are: China and Russian Federation already have an agreement for gas

The United States of America created World War Two. Because of a financial crisis in New York in 1929, as the German economy was recovering in spite of unpayable war reparations imposed by the Versailles Treaty, American creditors withdrew loans and the German economy collapsed. German banks closed their doors and mass unemployment followed leading to a political crisis of major proportions.

Once again, American capitalists are ready and willing to create another major war in Europe, but this time they are dealing with a different Germany and after some major disasters of American foreign policy the US government is about to create an even bigger disaster.

The bigger loser if sanctions go through are Germany and the European Union that without Russian gas would end depending on American fracking oil and from other sources that will come at a higher price while the Russian Federation will be sending gas to China in much bigger quantities and therefore getting a lot more than the amounts the Russian Federation would be getting from the European Union.  

German politicians are aware of the fact that with sanctions against the Russian Federation will be losing twofold. Energy supplies are becoming ever more difficult to find. Due to green policies, supplies from Netherlands will be vastly reduced. Natural gas from the Russian Federation or liquid gas from the US? More than 4,000 massive tankers will have to bring gas from the US to Europe. Even with such amounts being brought from US, 400 thousand million cubic metres of natural gas will not be easily replaced and dependence on Russian natural gas will be even greater.

US will not stop importing natural gas from the Russian Federation, but wants Germany to stop buying Russian natural gas. 

The whole exercise concerning Ukraine is a hypocritical and criminal attempt by the US to damage European countries. Getting rid of nuclear power was a bad idea and following the US is an even worse idea and therefore German interest must prevail over American grid and stupidity.

Thanks to sanctions, all that is achieved is a stronger alliance between Russia and China. German companies lose. 

Germany must implement foreign policies in German national interest instead of getting involved in America's whorehouse.

Alison Chabloz: How monies are being spent in court cases that serve no purpose whatsoever

 Alison Chabloz: How monies are being spent in court cases that serve no purpose whatsoever

For several years now, the English legal system has been used as a money making machine for private individuals and as money spending machine for British taxpayers in meaningless court cases that are not going to make things better.

If anything the legal circus is creating more problems and giving ammunition to groups that have as a given agenda the extermination of Jews across Europe including in Britain.

Jews and those who continue this legal circus more than 70 years after the presumed end of World War Two have made Adolf Hitler and his ideas immortal. Just a few days ago in Norway, Anders Breivik during an appeal sessson made a National Socialist salute and people across the world enjoyed the scene.

Some say that we are three weeks away from the start of yet another World War. Nobody rational would believe that should the conflict start in Ukraine it will stop in Ukraine. We know that given the policy of alliances, the conflict in all probability will spread like wildfire across the entire continent and this without taking into account that it could also trigger war in China as China would use this as a golden opportunity to implement its own agenda in Asia.

There are more than enough Far Right groups and Muslim groups in Europe to use the fog of war to go hunting Jews across Europe when countries are engulfed in a World War. What have been the mortal crimes committed by Alison Chabloz? She has written songs and expressed her views on radio programmes. If everybody who does not believe in the Jewish mantra of the Holocaust were to be imprisoned, more than half of the world's population would be in jail and history and especially after the presumed end of World War Two has not been favourable to Jews given the record of Israel and of certain very prominent individuals who have been constantly on the news.

The more people mention the persecution of Jews, the stronger the anti-Jewish movements become. The Jewish rhetoric feeds the anti-Jewish rhetoric in the same manner that the Muslim rhetoric feeds the anti-Muslim rhetoric and this is happening on a daily basis. The rhetorics about Jews and Muslism is mixed with vested interests and geopolitical interests and this is a deadly mix and wars are not the way to maintain social, economic and political stability.

Die Judenfrage is already being talked about and certain groups are rubbing their hands with glee. Chasing artists for writing songs and taking part in radio programmes will not save the idiots who are behind such harassment and persecution schemes.