Why Anti-Semitism activists are working together with the British Far Right?

 

Paul Besser and outspoken anti-Semitism activists 

Anti-Semitism campaigners in the United Kingdom appear to be working together with elements of the British Far Right and they appear to have a common interest in terms of going against Muslims and Pro-Palestine campaigners.

Paul Besser has been seen with Paul (former British National Party activist and organiser and present leader of Britain First) and with Jayda Fransen (formerly Britain First Deputy Leader and now involved in the leadership of the British Freedom Party due to stand in elections in Scotland to challenge Nicola Sturgeon for a seat in the Scottish Parliament).  

It can be said that Anti-Semitism campaigners are very close to Tommy Robinson (Stuart Lennox) and have been involved in campaigning for Tommy Robinson and have participated in rallies supporting Tommy Robinson. Anti-Semitism campaigners have also been involved with Anne Marie Waters (leader of For Britain) that also has an anti-Muslim narrative and has supporters that usually attend rallies, supporting Israel and are not favourable to the cause of Palestine. Former members of National Front and British National Party have publicly joined Anne Marie Waters. It must be said that Anne Marie Waters is a former member of UKIP that became disassocited from UKIP because of her views on Islam.

We know from the media (i.e. The Independent newspaper online) that there have been reports of threats made by Tommy Robinson against journalist like Lizzie Dearden that constantly classify Tommy Robinson as Far Right activist.

All three - Tommy Robinson (former BNP), Paul Golding (former BNP) and Jayda Fransen (former BNP and now associated with Nick Griffin (former BNP Leader) and Jim Dowson (former financial supporter of the BNP and founder of Britain First), have been convicted for incidents against Muslims in the United Kingdom. The question to ask is: are pro-Israel and anti-Semitism activists in the United Kingdom actively cooperating with the British Far Right to go against Muslims and those who support the cause of Palestine?

Tommy Robinson - Pro-Israel and anti-Islam

The links are apparently everywhere. It looks like some media are playing both sides at the same time. On the one hand they condemn Far Right activists for engaging in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, but they don't seem to want to talk about the obvious marriage of convenience between some anti-Semitism activists and the Far Right engaged in campaigns against Muslims in the United Kingdom.

Many politicians and many in the mass media are being less than honest by talking about issues when it suits their agenda and looking the other way when it doesn't suit their agenda.

Paul Besser and Jayda Fransen

The Fall of the BNP and the rise of National Action

The Fall of the BNP and the rise of National Action

There is no coincidence that groups like National Action appeared in the United Kingdom. The demise of the British National Party under a disastrous leadership led directly to the rise of extremist groups and National Action is one of them but there are many more and their numbers are being fulled by a very myopic approach that enriches the rhetoric of the violent against the principles of democratic coexistence.

Liberalism and Marxism have become the new intolerance. Marxism has always being intolerant but now has joined forces with Liberalism in a struggle that is destroying the foundation of a democratic way of life.

The designs and ulterior motives of Liberals and Marxists matter more than the will of the Electorate. We have been here before. The Weimar Republic comes to mind for the Weimar Republic was described as a democracy without democrats.

By putting obstacles along the way, Liberals and Marxists and the drivers of political correctness are destroying our democratic way of life. When people are banned from organizing political parties to take part in lawful democratic activities, Liberals and Marxists are creating the recipe for the destruction of our democratic way of life. Whether you like or dislike what people stand for, all political views should be present on the ballot for the Electorate to decide.

The then Home Secretary Amber Rudd banned National Action. What did she achieve? If I said 'Absolutely nothing,' I would be generous. She achieved something. She managed to increase radicalisation because the ideas of National Action have spread under other names and the myopic actions of the Electoral Commission are now being used as a recruitment tool.

When political ideas cannot be expressed within a democratic framework, radicalisation grows and spreads. If political fights do not take place by using ballots, we end up in a situation in which ballots will be replaced with guns.

Liberals and Marxists like to talk about the Good Friday Agreement that put an end to the troubles in the Republic of Ireland and in Northern Ireland. What was the idea of the Good Friday Agreement? To allow both Unionists and Republicans to engage in a democratic process as a meas to put an end to violence.

Using the same logic then, the Electoral Commission shouldn't use its powers to prevent the participation of political groups in democratic elections because by using its powers in such a manner the Electoral Commission is going against the spirit of the Good Friday Agreement. Democratic participation is the way to prevent violence. If the Electoral Commision prevents democratic participation then the Electoral Commission is promoting violence and I don't think that the Electoral Commision should be promoting violence because this is not what the Electoral Commission shoul.d be about.

We need as much democratic participation as possible. We need everybody involved in the democratic process. 

 

.

Peter Rushton and the Mole Thing

Peter Rushton and the Mole Thing

Peter Rushton: Fervent Nationalist or Long Standing Mole

Peter Rushton has usually presented himself as a fervent Nationalist and Holocaust Revisionist but suspicions have existed about his true calling and especially after an investigation was launched quite a few years ago in the days when Nicholas Griffin was a prominent figure in the British National Party.

He was often around following Nationalist personalities that included Jez Turner and Alison Chabloz and was present during court trials. 

Suffice to say that Sonia Gable - wife of Gerry Gable - was also a fervent Nationalist until she was found out as having gone to bed with the then National Front with the sole purpose of being close to the leadership to then reveal to others the inner thinking of  National Front with a view to sabotage the organisation. Much of the process of fragmentation of National Front was instigated by individuals like Sonia Gable that was happy to use her body to extract information.

John Tyndall - Former NF Leader and former BNP Leader

For a Jewess like Sonia Gable, joining National Front and engaging in forbidden relationships with National Front members and its Leadership was yet another example of the end justifies the means. To put it mildly, work didn't have to be a burden. It could be pleasurable and she got a lot of pleasure out of it.

There is a saying about "hiding in plain view is the best way to hide". Peter Rushton has been involved for some time with a publication called "Heritage and Destiny" that is one of the main sources of information for organisations like Searchlight and Hope Not Hate. If you needed a way to demonise anybody standing - in more than one way - Heritage and Destiny is heaven on earth because it provides everything Searchlight and Hope Not Hate might want in order to create and maintain stereotypes and Mr Peter Rushton is very much in charge of Heritage and Destiny. 

After following Alison Chabloz for some time, Peter Rushton and other individuals linked with Heritage and Destiny turned against Alison Chabloz because she dared to use her legal rights to appeal in the courts a sentence that she saw as unfair. Richard Edmonds - former NF, former BNP and presently member of NF under the leadership of Tony Martin is very much linked to Peter Rushton and closed ranks with him and others to attack Alison Chabloz. You would say that with friends like these  you don't need enemies. But then again, have they been friends or merely tools for others who have done their best (or their worst - depends on how you see it) to destroy the Nationalist Movement? 

Soon after this picture was taken near the Cenotaph in Central London (Richard Edmonds, Alison Chabloz and Tony Martin (present leader of National Front) appear on the right of the image)) - Richard Edmonds, Peter Rushton and Michele Renouf launched a series of ongoing visceral attacks against Alison Chabloz that organisations like Hope Not Hate have used to their delight. If the CAA didn't manage to destroy Alison Chabloz, Heritage and Destiny has been there to finish the job started by CAA. This fuels rumours that Heritage and Destiny is nothing more than a branch of Searchlight/Hope Not Hate and that "a well known male Nationalist that has been in fact a Mole for more than 25 years" is de-facto linked to Heritage and Destiny. Without mentioning names, the choices of who could be such Mole are self-evident given the aforementioned.

  

 

 

 

British National Party - Police playing politics

British National Party - Police Playing Politics

It is not the role of Police Forces in the United Kingdom to be a political party. Unfortunately, the Police in this country behave like a political party. We experience this when Police authorities say that somebody cannot be a police officer or play any role in Police forces if the said person is a member or has been a member of the British National Party, of EDL or of a range of other organisations that happen to be political organisations. What is more such depraved attitudes of Police authorities is shared by politicians of other political organisations and those running the mass media in the United Kingdom. Entire segments of British public opinion have been excluded, discriminated against, persecuted, harassed, excluded from jobs in many sectors of the British economy.

When you hear voices talking against extremism, including representatives of Police Officers, you know that they don't have a clue about what they are talking about. If you systematically exclude people from engaging in lawful activities, you will push people towards extremism. 

Jack Renshaw and others that are in British jails were young people who had political ambitions and who wanted to engage in the political process lawfully via elections. They were not about violence. They were not about threatening to kill people. They were systematically discriminated against and their turned against a system that excluded them. For this we have to blame Police Forces, the Political Establishment and the Mass Media and their messages and their messages that demonised ordinary human beings. When they saw that there was no political outlet, they went off the rail and started planning to kill fellow human beings to vent their frustration.

Jo Cox was not a victim and she is usually depicted by the Political Establishment and the Mass Media. She was a victimiser. She was actively campaigning to reinforce the trends towards exclusion and demonising and she fell on her own sword when an individual went out of his way to get her out.

Today, Members of Parliament  complain that they don't feel safe. Well, Members of Parliament of all sides of the political spectrum represented in Parliament feel unsafe. The time was well overdue for Members of Parliament to be made to feel unsafe because we as ordinary people have been feeling unsafe for a very long time because of the policies of a Parliament that lives most of the time in cuckooland. Do ordinary people feel safe? You can ask the relatives of those who have lost their lives or suffered because of the climate of insecurity created by the Political Establishment. They talk a  lot about gang crime but they do close to nothing to deal with the realities that lead to gang crime and knife crime. For ages ordinary people have been forced to live in subhuman conditions and the said subhuman conditions lead to crime.

Zero Hour contracts, sub-employment and other ills of hour time, what do the Political Establishment and the Mass Media think that badly paid unsafe jobs generate? They talk about school exclusions. Well, where do most of those excluded come from? They come from households that live on the edge in a permanent struggle for survival.

Look at the membership criteria of political parties. When they justify exclusions, they are justifying social exclusion and violence. They talk about having a national debate. Well, a real national debate should include all segments of the political spectrum including those they classify as extremist. 

Let me give an example. Before the Good Friday Agreement, the Provisional IRA and others were classified as terrorist organisations and Sinn Fein - the political side of the Provisional IRA - was excluded. Was there peace? When did Peace finally arrive? When there were talks between people who hated each other to death. 

The Far Right and those called Far Right have a genuine right to be part of the national debate for the debate to be national. Until everyone is included and until Police Authorities are forced to stop talking political rubbish, there will not be peace and more and more people will be going off the rail and engaging in violence as the only way of making their views known.

Germany and the Nationalist Movement in Britain

Germany and the Nationalist Movement in Britain

Unlike the CDU/CSU and SPD coalition, true German Nationalists are now in Britain working together to build a movement that will work for an Europe of Independent European Nations with their own identity working together.

At a meeting in Bromley, Southeast London, German representatives met to launch a new initiative that will completely change the face of British Nationalism in the United Kingdom. For decades, British Nationalism was associated with National Front and British National Party - a shoot of National Front. More recently we have seen the rise of organisations like the United Kingdom Independence Party, English Democrats, Britain First, For Britain and others. But the aforementioned never had a clear view nor a proper strategy. They have been seen as either Protest organisations and/or organisations with a very narrow and limited agenda.

Moreover, at one point or another the emphasis has been on winning elections and electoral losses have been followed by frustration leading to division and disintegration. The new approach is dramatically different. The idea is to disregard elections and focus on ground work that will provide the structures and leading figures that can have much greater influence working inside the system rather that trying to attack the system and wasting an enormous amount of resources in the process.

Financial resources and know-how and proper training are being provided. One of the crucial aspects of political activity is that firstly those doing the job were not paid and secondly that many resources are wasted in sterile campaigning that includes improper control of resources. One clear example is the British National Party that after a series of successes was destroyed by infighting and improper use of resources. At this very minute, the Leader and the Deputy Leader of the British National Party are facing a legal challenge for improper use of resources and political dereliction of duty.

The general idea is that in the present climate that includes a hostile mass media the traditional ways of being involved in politics could not provide the desired outcomes.

British elements will be coached and trained both in the United Kingdom and in Germany proper and individual are chosen using a very strict vetting process. Minimum remuneration for those chosen will be of not let than £50,000 a year.

Nick Griffin is the actual British National Party Leader

Nick Griffin is the actual British National Party Leader

When Adam Walker stood on a platform in London promising 'a New Leadership Style', he spoke about a brighter future with lots of visibility. Since then, the Karate Instructor has been practically invisible. Adam Walker is used to carry out interviews with members of the public without telling them who he is and he gets away with it because, unlike Nick Griffin, Adam Walker has no useful political profile apart for a dubious personal profile generated by a very public confrontation with students that made him become very shy and reluctant to appear in front of television cameras.

Nick Griffin was directly targeted because he used to get things done. Under his leadership a so called Far Right political party achieved what no so called Far Right organisation had achieved before or even dream about achieving. Two MEPs, a Member of the London Assembly, effective Opposition in a London local authority and a significant number of Councillors across the rest of the country. 

The spiteful National Front that never ever achieved anything of significance set out to destroy the British National Party. While the British National Party glorified national symbols and national flags, the National Front was either using flags with Swastikas or glorifying a foreign ideology while pretending to be British. National Front might gather around the Cenotaph but their ideals are far from being British ideals.

It is no coincidence that individuals like Richard Edmonds and Tony Martin went back to National Front. In actual fact, they never left and the National Front since its early days has been at war with itself, a war that was promoted by infiltrators like Sonia Gable who used to get information by mole-ing with practically every single National Front high ranking officer.

National Front Leaders don't last too long. But this doesn't really matter because it has never achieved anything of significance anyway. 

Did John Tyndall actually change when he left National Front to create the British National Party? Not really. And this is precisely why his replacement as Leader by Nick Griffin came as a shock to the system. People like John Tyndall wanted a bit of the same away from the backstabbing routine of the National Front. For John Tyndall, BNP was supposed to be NF Mark 2. His plans were brought to a halt by somebody who is much better educated than he was. The Cambridge Man wanted a completely new organisation without the crappy baggage of the National Front. 

People who were sick and tired of the treacherous practices of both Labour and Conservatives joined the new organisation. Labour voters and Conservative voters decided to support the British National Party and this made possible the landslide that produces two Members of the European Parliament. 

This was a red alert for the Establishment and the Mass Media that immediately decided to infiltrate and destroy the British National Party from within. Police Officers joined the British National Party and went around promoting dissent, engaging in racist talk and making salutes pretending to be genuine British National Party supporters. The campaign against Nick Griffin and the British National Party was planned, organised and implemented by the Political Establishment. To this effect, they used the mass media and para-political organisations like the UAF and Hope Not Gate. Labour Party politicians and mass media including the BBC produced a gigantic cover up regarding the indecent and criminal activities of Muslim gangs mainly of Pakistani descent for many years. In actual fact, Nick Griffin was the first one to denounce organised gang rape including drugs and alcohol and did so in dialogue with the BBC only to be called racist for denouncing criminal activities.

For more than 16 years, the Labour Party and Police knew about gang rape in epic proportions in places like Rotherham and other British cities and did absolutely nothing to protect vulnerable children many of who were being supposedly protected by Social Services that rather than protecting children were actively acting as suppliers of vulnerable children for the rapists.

The flag against crimes against children was later taken by Tommy Robinson - himself a former British National Party member -, Paul Golding - himself a former British National Party Member-, Jayda Fransen and Anne Marie Waters. With the exception of Anne Marie Waters, Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen have all had to serve prisons sentences as campaigners against abuses against children and campaigners against terrorism.

The next stage has been to ban campaigners like Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson from using social media to raise awareness of what is an ongoing problem in Britain. The likes of Gerard Batten and Kate Hopkins have joined the fight against abuses but entire areas of Britain have been taken over by individuals who can carry out attacks while little is being done to prevent such attacks or to punish the perpetrators.

Extremism is being promoted by the Establishment, the mass media and para-political organisations who try to silence those who denounce crime and this is done for political reasons. Certain Members of Parliament need the money and votes of the perpetrators of crimes to keep themselves in the House of Commons. When a Labour MP raised her head to denounce crimes, she was targeted and called racist.

Accusations of racism are the favourite tool of many political operators when they try to cover up abuses being committed. Recently, several Labour MPs left the Labour Party making speeches about anti-Semitism - including amongst them a Jewish MP. They should be reminded of the fact that a white Jewish Lady was told by Muslim leaders that she couldn't stand as local Candidate because she was too Jewish and too white. Any complaints about it? Isn't refusing to support a candidate because she was Jewish and white a flagrant expression of racism and anti-Semitism? What happened to Muslim leaders that engaged in racism and anti-Semitism? Absolutely nothing. Not even a slap on the wrists.

There should be one Justice for all regardless of race, religion or any other consideration. Justice should be Universal. But this doesn't happen in Britain, not even when you are dealing with Social Services that seem to be making decisions based on race, religion and nationality.

When there is so much talk about new political parties, there is the need of a political organisation that really and truly represent the views of a growing number of people who have become disenchanted with so called mainstream political parties. Without a Parliament that is truly representative of public opinion, we are going to go from crisis to crisis and as the gap between those occupying positions of power and the rest of the population grows, British Democracy will become increasingly unstable.

The rise of the Gilet Jaunes in France and elsewhere is no coincidence. Those who have no political representation take to the streets and conflict soon follows. Those wanting to protect a status quo that is not working use repression and bans up to the point when they lose control as a a consequence we see the rise of the number of corpses lying on the streets.

For a true Democratic System to exist and be effective, all views must be represented everywhere and this is includes governing bodies, the administration, education, mass media and social media.  

 

  

Alison Chabloz counters vicious attacks launched by Peter Rushton

Alison Chabloz counters vicious attacks launched by Peter Rushton

In response to my emotionally-challenged in-house critics and their demands for my SURGICAL REMOVAL from movement circles

“Look at your own lives, everyone of you: imagine that suddenly you have people against you saying 'you are a liar' or whatever ... and they are unable to find anything wrong in your life.”

~ Robert Faurisson, Shepperton, October 20^th 2018.

Thanks to TEAM RIVAROL for kindly inviting me to respond to the article signed Peter RUSHTON, translated on p. 2 of RIVAROL n° 3365, Le révisionnisme pourrait devenir un délit en GrandeBretagne : Vincent Reynouard est en grand danger! [lit. Revisionism risks being criminalised in

Britain: Vincent Reynouard is in grave danger!]. My gratitude in particular goes to RIVAROL editor Mr. Jérôme Bourbon for having redacted Rushton's ad hominem and personal abuse present in the original English publication.

Indeed, the English version of Rushton's most recent commentary [Chabloz succeeds in criminalising

'Holocaust denial'] is the latest in an aggravating series of four defamatory articles published by

Heritage & Destiny [H&D], beginning November 26^th 2018 with an astonishing statement¹ , signed by

Rushton, Michele Renouf, Richard Edmonds and “approved” by Guillaume Nichols, Joe Fallisi and Fred Leuchter, accusing me of being a “traitor and a saboteur”. Without a shred of evidence, the abovenamed persons accuse me, in public, of having informed Left wing “charity” Hope Not Hate of the October 20^th conference in Shepperton near London and, indirectly, for being ultimately responsible for the death of Professor Robert Faurisson the following day.

In contrast to RIVAROL offering a right to reply, the media strategy of Mr. Rushton and H&D as far as I am concerned has been to carry on smearing regardless.

Three further H&D articles - as well as French and English versions of a YouTube video uploaded by Vincent Reynouard following my recent re-trial at Southwark Crown Court – strongly suggest that my detractors not only wish to see me isolated from revisionist-nationalist ranks here in Britain, but that they are attempting to sever links I worked hard to foster with French and international revisionistnationalist colleagues. Astonishingly, in both the recent English H&D article and Reynouard's video, Rushton insists that I have never been part of the revisionist-movement and that my supporters would be wise to immediately withdraw their support, including their financial donations.

More worryingly still, Rushton's defamatory publications have now led to threats of violence against my person. First posted on the UK Vanguard News Network nationalist forum, these comments state that there is now apparently a £10,000 bounty on my head, along with a threat of acid being thrown in my face if I dare to attend any future nationalist-revisionist events. (These violent threats were originally drawn to my attention when they were copied and pasted to the comments section of Reynouard's recent YouTube video of his “interview” with Rushton).

Several forwarded emails originally penned by Rushton provide further clear evidence of this deliberate and ongoing smear campaign. A campaign of defamation not only against me personally, but perhaps also intended to destabilise and undermine the revisionist cause itself.

On November 26 and December 2 2018, Peter Rushton sent two emails to an English compatriot. In the first, he states, adding his own emphasis:

“Chabloz had to be denounced and had to be surgically removed from Movement circles... I know Chabloz lied about the 'Agence Bocage' article for which she blamed Michele Renouf at the start of the whole business and I know why she lied. I spoke face to face with the actual publisher of that piece last week.”

Vincent Reynouard confirms that a conversation between him and Rushton did indeed take place after the Shepperton event. However, contrary to Rushton's and others' claims, Reynouard strongly denies any involvement with the Agence Bocage article published just after my original trial began in January

2018 ². I stand by my original claim that the Agence Bocage hatchet job was instigated by Michele Renouf under the influence of her strategic thinker, Peter Rushton. Indeed, both the original and translated versions of Rushton's latest article echo the opinions expressed by the “anonymous” author of the Agence Bocage piece. Likewise, the mysterious author's fears over Reynouard's eventual extradition and imprisonment are reinterated in one H&D defamatory piece authored by veteran Nationalist Richard Edmonds ³. January 2018, following publication by Agence Bocage, Edmonds circulated the article via email (but not to me), gossiping that I had been “bocaged” and that Reynouard and I had fallen out “big time” - at the time, news to me.  In short, if Vincent Reynouard did not publish this article, then perhaps the real author/editor now needs to step forward.

In his second email of December 2nd, Rushton continues:

“Our investigation of what went wrong at Shepperton is not part of a political party or a student debating society: as such I do not respond to demands for 'proof', especially not Ms Chabloz's demands - I carry out an investigation only as I see fit. Since this was my event that was disgracefully betrayed, and especially considering Prof. Faurisson 's death weekend, I will be able to provide judge, jury and executioner.”

Thus, from judge, jury and executioner, to today's price tag of £10,000 on my head and the threat of an acid attack – result of an investigation carried out as seen fit by Mr. Rushton. Judging by Mr. Rushton's chequered past within British nationalism – including being banned from the British National Party in 2002 ⁴ – one cannot help but note the similarity of Rushton's investigatory approach with that of the East German Communist tribunal in John Le Carré's Cold War espionage novel, The Spy Who Came In From The Cold. Rushton's wording is an almost exact repetition of the Communist Party judge: evidence against double agent Hans-Dieter Mundt will be heard as the tribunal sees fit ⁵. As shown by the persecution and prosecution of revisionists, Soviet style investigation tactics are still very much in operation throughout the “free” west  and especially in Europe. However, deployment of such manifestly disloyal methods within the truth-seeking revisionist-nationalist community itself can only be described as exceedingly worrying, if not downright sinister.

As for last month's ruling, it seems that, according to the venomous Mr. Rushton and his handful of emotionally-challenged allies, it is wiser to simply shut up and do as we're told by the opposition rather than stand in the arena and fight back. Why no condemnation from Rushton & Co of the enemies of the free speech? Why no support for artistic expression? Why no demands for open and honest debate on matters “Holocaust”? Does Rushton's approach include similar condemnation of Dieudonné vs France, ECHR N° 25239/13 – cited during my trial by the prosecutor and in the court's ruling?

Since proceedings began, Rushton and Renouf have done everything in their power to undermine and discredit my contribution to the cause: censorship of my songs in Vichy 2017 at Robert Faurisson's 88^th birthday celebration; approval of Agence Bocage's 2018 hatchet job; childishly grotesque demands that I am to be excluded from nationalist-revisionist conferences; accusations without proof of betrayal and sabotage; lies and ritual defamation including holding me responsible for the death of Robert Faurisson; all indicating a course of action intended to bring about – in Rushton's most ungracious terms –  my “surgical removal from movement circles”. Little wonder that the highly respected late German nationalist, Manfred Roeder, described those who indulge in such dishonourable behaviour as “rogues and cutthroats” ⁶.

This “legal precedent” (true only in the most marginal sense) of which Rushton, Renouf and Reynouard complain - well, from my point of view, it is Rushton and Renouf themselves who are in part responsible because there was no need for my case to go to court in the first place. Uploaded to YouTube whilst I was in Switzerland, the video of my song (((Survivors))) was outside the jurisdiction of England and Wales. As Rushton admits in RIVAROL and H&D, he “personally felt my trial was winnable” - to the extent that he then even proposed himself as “expert” defence witness as part of my legal team. 

Ultimately, is Peter Rushton to be congratulated? There are many who believe that my trial has brought the revisionist cause well and truly under the spotlight here in Britain. With regard to the sensationalist and absurd statement that I would be responsible for the criminalization of 'Holocaust denial', perhaps after examining his own role in this case, Rushton would do well to spit his venom at my accusers and their puppets, rather than simply parroting their rhetoric whilst seeking to undermine one of his compatriots.

My case will now continue in the Divisional Court to challenge the legal points of "sending" = downloading / sharing links on a "public" electronic network.

Finally, I cannot conclude without expressing my deepest gratitude to my solicitor Kevin LowryMullins and my barrister Adrian Davies for remaining loyal and steadfast over the past two years.

Bravo and thank you to those who truly support all revisionists, the revisionist cause and the right to freedom of expression.

Alison Chabloz, February 28^th 2018.

alisonchabloz.com

^1.  The sabotage of Prof. Robert Faurisson’s Shepperton meeting: informants exposed; Heritage and Destiny, Preston, UK; 2018.

^2.  Affaire Chabloz: stragtégie problématique et danger réel; Agence Bocage, Green Lanes, London, 2018.

^3.  Does Alison Chabloz know what she’s doing? Or criminalising “Holocaust”-revisionism by the back door; Heritage and Destiny, Preston, UK; 2019.

^4.  Considerations For Proscription – A BNP Booklet; British National Party, 2002.

⁵.The Spy Who Came In From The Cold, p. 180; John Le Carré, Hodder and Stoughton Ltd., London, 1963.

^6. Deutsche Bürgerinitiative newsletter n° 11/12, p. 3; Schwarzenborn, Germany, 2013.

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties hypocrisy

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties' hypocrisy

Gerard Batten and Tommy Robinson

Gerard Batten's Dilemma was created by Nigel Farage when Nigel Farage - without questioning - surrendered UKIP to Political Correctness. Why? All other political parties have former BNP members, former NF members, former EDL members and even former IRA members.

The Labour Party has the highest numbers of BNP, NF and EDL former members. In fact, Jeremy Corbyn was elected and re-affirmed as Labour Party Leader with BNP, NF and EDL former members votes.

The BBC didn't look into it. SKY News didn't look into it. They just focused on UKIP to chastise UKIP for something all other political parties have done. A former IRA members represents the Conservative Party in Greater London.

Today, the House of Commons and everything around the Houses of Parliament had to do with Brexit and the votes on a series of amendments presented by both Government and Opposition. I met Gerard Batten and spoke with him about these issues directly. Why? Because the London Regional Press Office asks questions directly. I met Gerard Batten near the House of Commons and we spoke about these issues and the fact that Tommy Robinson contracted as Adviser cannot stand for election representing UKIP because he is not a member of UKIP and he is not a member of UKIP because UKIP's Membership Rules explicitly excludes former members of the BNP and of EDL. Tommy Robinson was a BNP member and was also an EDL member.

But there is another paradox. Despite the fact that officially UKIP Membership Rules exclude former members of BNP, and EDL from becoming members of UKIP, UKIP has members that were at one point in time members of BNP, NF and EDL. How did this happen? Well, those who were not publicly known members of BNP, NF and EDL existed under the radar. 

As Gerard Batten explained to me personally in a face to face conversation, UKIP introduced the said Membership Rules to avoid being infiltrated by BNP, NF and EDL and others.

Nobody knows for certain what will happen on March 29th 2019. Nobody knows what will happen before March 29th 2019. What is certain is that a group of minority parties are struggling to get the support of individuals that occupy practically the same segment of public opinion. The announcement by Nigel Farage that he wants to create a new political party doesn't help. In fact, it divides even more those who share certain political views. 

What will happen when issues like Abortion come to the fore? What will happen when they have to decide on Economic Policies or Foreign Affairs? Will minority parties maintain the same level of support they have until now? They might be united with regards to Islam or Immigration? Will they be united when it comes to a whole range of others issues that any political party has to deal with?

   

There is true British Nationalism but it is nothing to do with labels

There is true British Nationalism but it is nothing to do with labels

I spent many years surrounded by individuals who called themselves Nationalists and Patriots but in actual fact they have done absolutely nothing for what should be true British Nationalism. They spoke against immigration saying "we are being replaced, this country is coming to an end, those foreigners are having too many babies and there are far too many foreigners", et cetera, et cetera.

I went to what were supposed to be political meetings and what I found out is that most of those in attendance were either single, widowed or divorced and that a minute minority actually had husbands and wives and children. On top of that the average age was going up and up and up and at one point the meetings became a gathering of the same faces but older.

I heard people talking endlessly about families and the importance of keeping communities together but most of them didn't have families and apart from attending the said meetings most of them lived alone and hardly mingled with the local communities.

I also found out that amongst the so called Nationalists and Patriots were people filled up with conspiracy theories and personal animosities that from time to time erupted turning into confrontation and declared personal wars that suddenly at an ever faster pace led to people simply walking away to the point that sooner than later the number of those in attendance could be counted with the fingers of two hands.

They were still talking about saving the world but I suspect that many of them couldn't even save themselves as some were already falling into financial difficulties. In my honest opinion, such kind of pseudo Nationalism and Pseudo Patriotism is a social disease because it gives it destroy in peoples' minds the concept and perception of what it means to be Nationalist and Patriotic.

They spoke endlessly about winning elections but when asked about what policies they supported and how they were planning to achieve what they want their faces showed very clearly that they didn't have a clue about how they were going to go about it. Most probably they thought that shouting as loud as possible British Job for the British Workers they were going to achieve some kind of miracle without ever having to do hard work to achieve what they wanted. With regularity I talked about the need to know about the real issues instead of just going around with slogans and fabrications.Not that they were willing to listen or try to engage in real politics.

When the time came, exhausted, I decided that I had had enough of such company. I started to feel that I was degrading myself, fooling myself by thinking that anything worth considering was going to come out of such company. Years passed and little has changed apart from the fact that the old faces are older and that the brains behind those faces are too lazy or incapable of doing anything of value. The infighting goes on but it is now less visible because, after all, there are fewer of the said Nationalists and Patriots. Most of those who were worth something moved on. 

There is a select group of people that I call 'Idealists', the 'True Believers', but there are so few of the Idealists and True Believers that they practically don't stand a chance of changing what needs to be changed because on top of having to struggle to generate some momentum and sense of direction they are burdened and dragged down by those who don't have any intention of becoming a real political organisation with a true sense of purpose. 

Nationalism is about real work. Those who still believe that organising a few meetings, reading newspaper cuttings to an ever dwindling audience, having a collection cap in hand to try and collect few pennies, drink a few pints and do nothing else is Nationalism, they can go and get stuffed. Such looser tactics are ruining everything for those who really Nationalism when they use the word.

UKIP Membership Criteria

UKIP Membership Criteria

By applying for membership of UKIP, I agree:

• to abide by the UKIP Constitution and the Terms and Conditions of Membership 
• I am not and have not been a member of the British National Party, National Front, British Freedom Party, British People's Party, English Defence League, Britain First or the UK First Party.
• UKIP reserves the right to reject or terminate memberships if these criteria are not met.

How does this affect those who work for UKIP but are not members? It doesn't affect those who are not members. Tommy Robinson is a service provider and a service provider that provides an unpaid service and therefore he is not affected by membership criteria.

Nigel Farage spoke about UKIP led by Tommy Robinson. Well, this is not remotely possible under present membership criteria. In order to lead UKIP Tommy Robinson would have to become a member. This is something Tommy Robinson cannot do because it is expressly forbidden by present UKIP membership rules. Nigel Farage over-reacted and terminated his own membership. Nigel Farage effectively broke away from UKIP. 

One of UKIP's greatest weaknesses is Political Correctness. For a political party that came out to campaign against political correctness, UKIP has been manipulated by mass media to adopt membership criteria that other political parties - including so called mainstream political parties - do not have. Trying to be whiter than white, UKIP effectively excluded a massive number of voters that would have like to become members of UKIP and/or vote for UKIP. No rational individual would vote for a political party that doesn't want him/her to be a member. Therefore, whatever the present leader of UKIP wants or doesn't want to do, the fact remains that unless UKIP membership rules change the party would be shooting itself in the foot.

At one point, as leader, Niger Farage rejected any links with Front National and with Marine Le Pen. Curiously enough, Nigel Farage had a very visible presence at a gathering of Alternative für Deutschland. To this effect, consistency was absent. Front National (now Rassemblement National) is the second biggest political party in France. Alternative für Deutschland is the second biggest political party in Germany. They share a Nationalist agenda. How is the circle squared by Nigel Farage? It isn't squared. It cannot be squared. 

Nigel Farage criticises what he calls the 'anti-Muslim agenda'. What is the agenda of both Alternative für Deutschland and Front National about Islam? Once, again, Nigel Farage is not consistent in this regard when he associated himself with Alternative für Deutschland.

LRPO: Message sent by Alison Chabloz

London Regional Press Office receives message sent by Alison Chabloz

Dear Friends, 

Thank you to all who replied to my last email which included my latest parody "Lying Thieves". Apologies for not responding individually and for yet another impersonal mass email: busy times ahead! Please do let me know if you didn't receive the song and I will send you a copy. 

Upcoming court dates for my Appeal against conviction and sentencing are scheduled for December 10, 11 and 12 at Southwark Crown Court in central London. My solicitor informs it is quite possible that the court may have other urgent business and may therefore have to postpone. 

In other news, I was honoured to lay a wreath at the Cenotaph in London last Sunday November 11 in remembrance of the 784 members of the British Armed Forces who lost their lives during the peacekeeping mission to Palestine 1945-1948. Below you will find the link to some photos and a short video of the speeches given by Richard Edmonds, Tony Martin, Jordan Pont and myself at the rally afterwards. Many thanks to National Front Chairman and Deputy Chairman for organising the traditional Remembrance Day parade and allowing me to participate.

Finally, alongside preparations for my Appeal, I have been submitting several Subject Access Requests (SAR) to various organisations all involved to some extent in the conspiracy to have me prosecuted (visibly not for the "sending" of my songs over the Internet, but rather for the messages contained within the songs themselves). Companies and organisations must comply within 30 days according to the new GDPR rules. One organisation showing particular reticence is The Jewish Chronicle.

My SAR to the JC was submitted following an online article which associates the Pittsburgh Synagogue shooting with "UK far right extremists" on Gab, one of the social media platforms used by the shooter and which the enemies of free speech wish to see closed down. As well as citing my name, the JC article goes further in claiming that I would use Gab to "urge supporters" to donate via PayPal to a "legal fund".

As we have seen so many times in the past, this is one of the tried and tested techniques used by those wishing to stifle free and open debate. It's how they do it: demonise the messenger - not the message. Indeed, the article reminds me of several similar pieces published last year by the Canadian press, during my tour there organised by Paul Fromm, which associated my visit with the spate of bomb threats to US and Canadian Synagogues and Jewish community centres. As we know, it turned out that these bomb threats were the work of a "mentally unstable" Israeli Jew... 

In short, the JC's unfounded allegation inevitably led to my PayPal account being shut down last Tuesday, without explanation and without recourse to appeal. In addition to my SAR, I have submitted a complaint about the JC article to the Independent Press Standards Organisation. A couple of recent posts published on my website give details of successful SARs so far (link below). On the advice of a friend, I have set up an alternative to PayPal which can be found on my website. 

Again, thanks to all for your support and messages of good will. I will keep you informed concerning my Appeal and hope to see a good turnout at Southwark Crown Court on the day. 

Musical wishes,

Alison Chabloz.

Labour Party is more extreme that National Front, BNP and EDL

And this are the people accusing National Front, British National Party, EDL, Tommy Robinson, Jez Turner, Alison Chabloz, Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen, Nick Griffin and many others of being Racists, Fascists, Nazis, and of many other things.

The UAF, Hope Not Hate, and Antifa - to name a few, are dangerous organisations that demonise, persecute, harass, discriminate against and even attack innocent people simply because they hold different political ideas.

Those who have been unjustly treated have got organised and will counter attack where it hurts. I have been shown databases of well-known names and background information of what they have been up to to show them for what they really are.

It is basically a methodical approach to continue what started with lists of politicians who had been involved in sexual crimes and financial crimes but it goes a lot farther than that. Several Members of Parliament were ousted. Keith Vaz and his affairs with male escorts, Denis McShane and his false declarations of Parliamentary Expenses, Jacqui Smith and the cost of pornographic material paid as Parliamentary Expenses.

If you a member of Antifa, UAF, Hope Not Hate or any other organisation that go around defaming, libelling, persecuting, harassing and attacking those who are falsely accused of being Racists, Fascists and Nazis, you have many reasons to be afraid. They are going to come after you. There might something that you don't want the public to know about your personal life or something that you have done that have violated existing laws. Whatever you have done will be publicly known and you will face criminal charges for any crimes that you might have committed.

Why the Swastika? What is the appeal

Why the Swastika? What is the appeal?

In quite a few court cases of notoriety, it appears that the Swastika is the symbol of choice for what are fundamentally 'Lone Wolves' with intent to cause harm to those they see as anathema, as the mortal enemy.

Whatever the country where cases are brought to public attention, the symbol of National Socialist Germany that is also part of Hindu Culture is at the forefront. So what are the qualities of the symbol that seem to be so irresistible?

First of all, the Swastika is a symbol of perpetuity, of energy and of renewal. There is an inherent vast amount of energy contained in the Swastika. During the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s there were other elements added to the Swastika. Although the Swastika is black there is a preponderance of red. Both the Soviet flag, the Chinese flag and the National Socialist flag are predominantly red and red is associated with blood, with enormous vitality and this is why the National Socialist flag was such a powerful representation of a nation. There is perpetuity, renewal, energy and vitality combined.

Coming to Britain, red has always been a predominant colour. Red of England, red is the uniform of the Welsh Guards, red in the national flag, the Red Arrows, Red Roses. We are so used to this reality that we simply assume this is the way things are and we don't even stop to think about a hidden message.

Red is the colour of Revolution and whether you are talking about the concepts of Left and Right from a political point of view, the importance of Red cannot be underestimated. National Socialism was a Revolution, it was a completely new way of doing things despite the fact that there were claims about trying to restore past greatness.

One example, but not the only one example, was the military campaign leading to the invasion of France in 1940. France went to war as if it was fighting the 1914 war again. Germany used a completely new approach in which the impossible was possible. The advice given by Heinz Guderian to the commanders was something like 'Strike swiftly but don't disperse your forces'. The key elements are unity of purpose, speed and fundamentally the sense of belonging.

When a disaffected, usually frustrated individual of today, looks at his/her surroundings, what does he/she see? He/She sees a divided society, a very fragmentary reality, a world in which he/she doesn't fit in. He/She was born in a country in which the political elites and the mass media are constantly downgrading the concept of National Identity and replacing National Identity with what they call Multiculturalism. Even more, National Identity and National Pride are identified as threats, as sins, as something deplorable.

It is self-evident that such an individual will therefore turn to the symbol that represents what he/she wants most. He/She wants a national identity. He/She wants the sense of belonging. He/She wants a sense of perpetuity, of renewal, of energy and of vitality combined and the National Socialist flag represents exactly what he/she dreams about and most importantly what he/she needs most.

With varying degrees, more and more the young feel that they are being abandoned, that they don't count, that they are invisible. If your personal circumstances are such that you feel literally excluded, uneducated, jobless, and living in precarious conditions without what you would call a future, what are your available choices? 

The reaction of the Establishment is brutal. Instead of looking at specific circumstances that put individuals in very precarious situations, the State wants to punish those who have been already punished by being excluded. The individuals targeted are called Neo-Nazi, Fascist, Terrorist. The Establishment rarely or never takes responsibility for the distressing circumstances ordinary people have to face on a daily basis.

When Germans protest against occupation and destruction of Germany, they called Neo-Nazi. When French people protest against occupation and destruction of France, they are called Neo-Nazi. Anybody and anyone who stands to protect his/her country is called Neo-Nazi.

Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!

Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!

The Windrush Scandal brought Amber Rudd down but her incompetence was shown long before. I knew Jack Renshaw and many of those accused of being members of National Action. None of them would be capable of any acts of terrorism. The whole thing has been a shameful circus for political posturing.

About 85% of inmates in British jails are Muslim. What does this tell you about what is going on? Then came the reports that more whites are being arrested and charged with terrorism. Why? Because they had to use Police Forces to show that they were not being unduly harsh with Muslim criminals. The fact of the matter remains that all those murdered in terrorists acts in the United Kingdom have been killed by Muslim criminals or Muslim converts. Lee Rigby was killed by Muslim converts. A Police Officer was slaughtered in Westminster stabbed by a Muslim convert. Not a single person has been killed by a white terrorists because there are no white terrorists.

Liberals and Marxists want to justify their ideological stances by blaming innocent whites and pursue their campaign of ethnic cleansing that is destroying Europe. ethnic cleansing that will lead to war and to the disintegration of democratic institutions that has taken centuries to forge.

It took centuries for women to be able to vote. Muslims treat women as slaves or at best as second or third class individuals. Many of them believe that they have to deliberately damage women's bodies with the so called Female Genital Mutilation or that they have to be hidden, covered with bed clothing when they walk on the streets. An Asian Lady Peer denounced that Muslim men were importing women to use them as cash cows by exploiting the welfare state by claiming benefits for children of several wives.

Many Muslims believe and they speak openly about it that women only exist to pleasure men. The promise of tens of virgins to deliver sexual pleasures to those who blow up themselves for Allah more than proves the extraordinary disregard for women to be seen not as wives and mothers but as objects to be exploited. They not even respect their own daughters to the point that for ages there have been ongoing investigations about forced marriages and about girls that have been killed or have had to escape, to run away from their families, because they felt that their lives were in danger. This is the Islam, the so called culture, that Liberals and Marxists want to impose on us.

For more than sixteen years, Police and Politicians looked the other way while thousands of vulnerable children were raped and drugged by Muslim gangs and those raising the alert were accused of racism. Instead of protecting vulnerable children, for the said Police Officers and Politicians it was more important to protect their positions at the expense of vulnerable children and they wilfully protected Muslim criminals.

The rage against Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, against Nick Griffin and others is that they not only denounced Muslim depravity and terrorism. They have actively campaigned against Muslim depravity and Muslim Terrorism. The Security Services themselves say on a regular basis that they are quashing terror attempt after terror attempt of Muslim Terrorists and when they failed to do so people died. Lee Rigby was beheaded by people that the Security Services were trying to recruit. They couldn't foil attacks in London and Manchester and people died. We have Hate Priests using public spaces, Mosques and Cultural Centres to spread hatred against Non Muslims. Not only that. We have jails being used to promote Muslim Terrorism. 

The real terrorists have not been members of organisations like National Action. The real terrorists have been supported by Liberals and Marxists.

The icing on the cake was Amber Rudd's actions during the Windrush Scandal. She deliberately lied to Parliament about the immigration shambles in which documents were destroyed and families who came to Britain in good faith have been made to suffer. Whether dealing with Terrorism or dealing immigration, Amber Rudd was not fit for purpose and now she is trying to rock the boat to ignore the will of the British People that in a democratic exercise decided to leave the European Union.

Moment of Reckoning Approaches as tensions rise in UK

Moment of Reckoning Approaches as tensions rise in UK

I have never seen in the United Kingdom such tensions. As if this wasn't enough, tensions are also being promoted by mass media. Britain has been suffering from tensions created by Muslims and Jews - the poison chalice for any Western Civilization - and now the problems have been compounded by political meltdown very much generated by Muslims and Jews and acolytes.

The situation is dire. A vast number of families cannot make ends meet and this is happening why flood immigration is spreading as poison in the blood system of a country that has fallen victim of its own desire to help everybody. Political Parties unable or unwilling to deal with serious issues, dominated by people with anti-British agendas, are promoting a climate that will end in civil war.

When a political system cannot deal with peoples' problems and meet peoples' needs, the scene is ripe for widespread violence. More and more people are disenfranchised and no longer believe in the political system and are ready and willing to do by force what cannot be done by reason.

Politics will be made on the streets as censorship is on the rise and Social Media are becoming more and more repressive. If people cannot use the pen, people will use the sword.

Of Spitfires and Hurricanes

Of Spitfires and Hurricanes

I have seen quite a few documentaries referring to the making of Spitfires and Hurricanes and about the development of the Royal Navy - Royal Air Force and Royal Navy being two key branches of the British Armed Forces but seldom or never I see questions raised about the fact that Britain doesn't make any major warplanes anymore - apart for the Euro Fighter that was shared with other European countries, came late into service and was already outdated before entering active service. Not very often we hear questions asked about why British shipyards are less active than ever before and why Britain is buying off-the shelf imports like the F35. Defence industries have been either privatised or dismantled or bypassed to buy foreign products.

Neither Labour nor Conservatives are the answer to Britain's problems and don't count on Liberals that would dismantle whatever is left of the British Armed Forces. There is no long term strategy that could be said to be British. The brand news aircraft carriers will not carry British planes but American planes. The British Independent Nuclear Deterrent is neither independent nor British. It totally depends on the US.

All the talk about preparing Britain to face new challenges is pure chit chat because in fact very little is being done to beef up the British Armed Forces. More people are leaving the Services and there is a recruitment crisis. Expertise is being lost and numbers are not growing. Britain is less prepared today to face new challenges than Britain was prepared to face new challenges in the 1930s and by then Britain had a more homogeneous population and didn't have to be on permanent red alert to counter imported terrorists.

Countering Islamic Terrorism and putting and end to flood immigration are issues of National Security. Instead of keeping them in jail at public expense, all Muslim terrorists should be thrown out together with their families. The Demographic Balance must be restored. Britain will not be able to defend itself if it has people that following a depraved political ideology called Islam are ready and willing to stab Britain in the back.  

Jailing people for Reckless Statements could be violation of Human Rights

Jailing People for Reckless Statements could be violation of Human Rights

In Totalitarian Britain, Police Forces are being used for Political Persecution and I must emphasise the word 'used' because at the end of the day if they are used to terrorise and persecute for political purposes they are just following orders given by their masters.

People get angry. People get frustrated. People express their anger openly and this is only human. People say things that in normal conditions they wouldn't say and we need to have a degree of understanding of why sometimes human beings react, explode with anger.

In Politically Correct Britain, the expression 'causing offence' is being used to terrorise individuals to deter them from using their Freedom of Speech to the point when Freedom of Speech is no more. The truth can be offensive to those who don't want the truth to be told.

Hating other people is normal. It is absolutely human. Expressing harsh criticism against other people is absolutely normal. If you hate somebody, it is your human right to say 'I hate so and so'. If you hate a Jew or a Muslim, if you hate a Conservative MP, a Labour MP or an MP of whatever political party, it should be totally normal and acceptable to say it as loud as you can and as publicly as you can. But we live in a Totalitarian State in which only those who are more equal than others are free to express their hatred.

If want to say that you hate an individual classed as Far Right, you can say it without fear of 'causing offence' and without fear of being accused of 'hate speech'. Jews and Muslims are free to insult and threaten anybody else. But beware if you are the one saying that you hate Jews or Muslims. You will be arrested and most probably jailed accused of anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, racism and of indulging in hate speech.

The direct consequence of double standards is that, at the end of the day, double standards will fuel anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and Jews and Muslims will be targeted and in some cases killed because repression and double standards make people feel that they are discriminated against and persecuted for expressing their anger while Jews and Muslims are allowed to get away with murder.

Lets look at the conduct of mass media and politicians when it comes to those they hate. They are free to attack, to libel and defame and even threaten those they hate but the same freedom is not accorded to ordinary people or to those they hate.

If an ordinary individual and those classed as Far Right were to say what some politicians and mass media or those classed as 'antifa' say, they would be arrested and jailed.

We are all human beings. We love and we hate and rightly so. No one should be persecuted or harassed for expressing their love or their hatred towards others. We must get rid of Political Correctness and legislation that prevent us from being human and in the process we will free the courts for courts to be used to deal with real crimes.

You hate Jews? So what? You hate Muslims? So what? As long as you don't go out armed and with intent to attack somebody, you should be free to express your hatred. Unfortunately, with every passing day, we go deeper and deeper into the realm of sheer stupidity in which legislation is being used to destroy human beings and to create robots. Are you offended? Be offended if you wish. I am offended by high levels of mental retardation that I have witnessed in British courts.