Tommy Robinson`: a picture that speaks a thousand words

 

This is Tommy Robinson, proudly and happily standing on top of an Israeli Defense Force tank near the Syrian border.

His anti-Muslim rhetoric is clearly linked to Irsael so when questions are asked about who is funding Tommy Robinson, the answers should be very straightforward.

Whatever happens in United Kingdom is directly linked to conflicts in Middle East and Asia Minor.

Some operators play the two sides. On the one hand they criticize Tommy Robinson in public while pledging support for Muslim communities, while in private they fully support what he is doing in the United Kingdom and also support what is being done in the Arab World, including the genocide taking place in the occupied territories and now spreading to neighbouring countries.

Tommy Robinson: Manipulation is the art of having somebody do what you want without getting publicly involved

Message sent to a Zionist organisation in London and referred to Members of Parliament including members of the British government, the Opposition, the Muslim Council of Britain and mass media including Lizzie Dearden, writer for The Independent thas has been involved in reporting about Tommy Robinson, and also sent to the Metropolitan Police in London that been repeatedly involved in actions involving public rallies and demonstrations and the courts. 

"Dear Sir/Madam,

Tommy Robinson standing on an IDF tank is Israel and then they tell you that he is not one of them. Ah, look! He is holding a gun. How many non-Jews would be allowed to hold a war gun standing on an IDF tank in Israel? What you tell us in London goes against factual information. At every rally, there have been Zionists supporting Tommy Robinson and his anti-Muslim messages.  During his courts trials, Zionists have been very visible supporting Tommy Robinson and Israeli flags have accompanied every single rally in support of Tommy Robinson. Those organising and supporting Tommy Robinson’s rallies at the highest level are Jewish: Israeli Jews and non-Israeli Jews.

Perhaps you could come up with a coherent, consistent and plausible explanation. I copy this message to the Muslim Council of Britain. I reckon they also deserve an explanation.

Perhaps you can also offer an explanation to the Metropolitan Police and to other Police forces in the UK that have spent a huge amount of resources policing rallies that you supported while promoting animosity against Muslims in the United Kingdom.

You throw a rock, you hide your hands behind your back and claim to be innocent.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen"

Undoubtedly, members of the public have been taken for a ride for a very long time and offered images that don't fit in with the narrative of certain organisations that use public perception for their own ends, ends that have little to do with their declared aims.

It is no coincidence that at a time when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that fully supports the Israeli Far Right is involved in pushing forward the agenda of a Greater Israel using ethnic cleansing to throw out Palestinians from the occupied territories, Zionist organisations are publicly attempting to distance themselves from individuals that have been useful to their cause. 

This happens also a time when more and more Jews are turning against Benjamin Netanyahu that has been visibly unable to win an outright majority in Israel and remain in power as a caretaker Prime Minister.

There is also the fact that as Prime Minister he has protection against the charges made against him by the Israeli Judiciary for serious cases of fraud in which his own wife is also signalled as being involved. Therefore the importance of fuelling the ongoing conflict producing killings and destruction is twofold: conflict and murder keep Benjamin Netanyahu in power and by the same token allows him to carry on with his agenda of ethnic cleansing.

Rachel Shabi, Jewish writer writing on The Independent, London, England, United Kingdom:  

As we count the toll and name the dead, the bloody, grinding narrative of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has switched from “simmering tensions” to “escalating violence”. Everyday violence is now part of Jerusalem life. You sense it when Palestinian residents of this holy city, treated with animosity and suspicion, are deafened by the maddening hum of Israeli surveillance helicopters, when they face routine stop-and-searches and arrests by border police and often violent harassment from Jewish settlers. It’s there in the increasing presence of those settlers, not just in the expanding group of settlements that ring Jerusalem, but also in Palestinian neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem and the Old City. It’s there in the hate mobs and the chants of “death to Arabs” that spill on to the city’s streets.

In the absence of a political framework, it’s inevitable that these “simmering tensions” will spasmodically escalate. For where else can the anger and unresolved disputes go if there are no political channels through which to mediate?

Political vacuums are opportunistically filled by extremists. In Jerusalem, hardline Jewish national-religious settler groups have taken their fight from the West Bank to the city’s holy sites. Temple Mount, or Haram al-Sharif – the beautiful walled compound in the Old City that is sacred to Jews and Muslims – has long functioned according to status quo agreements. Under these, Jews can visit but not pray at the sacred site, while the Western Wall, just underneath, is reserved for Jewish prayer. But in recent years, movements calling for Jewish prayer rights have repeatedly flouted the codes, causing tensions and disturbances at the compound.

To be clear, this is not a religious coexistence campaign; Jewish religious leaders have for centuries ruled against Jewish prayer at Temple Mount. Indeed, the aims of the settler-led movement for additional worshipping rights become more transparent when you hear how they want to destroy the Dome of the Rock and replace it with a third Jewish Temple.

This would be bad enough in itself, but such extremist national-religious groups, once fringe and marginal, are now powerful and mainstream, partly because they are supported and funded by the current, settler-endorsing Israeli coalition.

Rachel Shabi perfectly describes what is going on. Power in Israel has been taken over by Jewish Far Right Extremists, Far Right Extremists supported by Zionist branches across the world, the kind of people that support Tommy Robinson because what Tommy Robinson is doing in the United Kingdom is no different from what Zionists are doing in Israel and in the occupied territories. It is plainly obvious that they want to publicly distance themselves from Tommy Robinson for the sake of keeping appearances since Tommy Robinson has been defined as British Far Right and has a political past as former member of the British National Party and founder of other parapolitical movements. 

Organisations like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters also have a pro-Zionist narrative and include  as members former members of the British National Party and this goes to show that when they are useful to promote messages supporting aggression in the occupied territories they are conveniently used. When they don't need to use them they call the said individuals Nazi, Fascist, Terrorist and the like.  

Why Anti-Semitism activists are working together with the British Far Right?

 

Paul Besser and outspoken anti-Semitism activists 

Anti-Semitism campaigners in the United Kingdom appear to be working together with elements of the British Far Right and they appear to have a common interest in terms of going against Muslims and Pro-Palestine campaigners.

Paul Besser has been seen with Paul (former British National Party activist and organiser and present leader of Britain First) and with Jayda Fransen (formerly Britain First Deputy Leader and now involved in the leadership of the British Freedom Party due to stand in elections in Scotland to challenge Nicola Sturgeon for a seat in the Scottish Parliament).  

It can be said that Anti-Semitism campaigners are very close to Tommy Robinson (Stuart Lennox) and have been involved in campaigning for Tommy Robinson and have participated in rallies supporting Tommy Robinson. Anti-Semitism campaigners have also been involved with Anne Marie Waters (leader of For Britain) that also has an anti-Muslim narrative and has supporters that usually attend rallies, supporting Israel and are not favourable to the cause of Palestine. Former members of National Front and British National Party have publicly joined Anne Marie Waters. It must be said that Anne Marie Waters is a former member of UKIP that became disassocited from UKIP because of her views on Islam.

We know from the media (i.e. The Independent newspaper online) that there have been reports of threats made by Tommy Robinson against journalist like Lizzie Dearden that constantly classify Tommy Robinson as Far Right activist.

All three - Tommy Robinson (former BNP), Paul Golding (former BNP) and Jayda Fransen (former BNP and now associated with Nick Griffin (former BNP Leader) and Jim Dowson (former financial supporter of the BNP and founder of Britain First), have been convicted for incidents against Muslims in the United Kingdom. The question to ask is: are pro-Israel and anti-Semitism activists in the United Kingdom actively cooperating with the British Far Right to go against Muslims and those who support the cause of Palestine?

Tommy Robinson - Pro-Israel and anti-Islam

The links are apparently everywhere. It looks like some media are playing both sides at the same time. On the one hand they condemn Far Right activists for engaging in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, but they don't seem to want to talk about the obvious marriage of convenience between some anti-Semitism activists and the Far Right engaged in campaigns against Muslims in the United Kingdom.

Many politicians and many in the mass media are being less than honest by talking about issues when it suits their agenda and looking the other way when it doesn't suit their agenda.

Paul Besser and Jayda Fransen

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

Introduction:

In the midst of an international crisis generated by the spread of Corona Virus, other battles are being fought. The apparent disappearance of the British National Party from the political arena under what Adam Walker and Clive Jefferson - present Leader and Deputy Leader - defined as "new leadership style", the BNP became a ghost in British politics. This led to the formation of groups like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters. Her attempt to fill up the void has been shown as no more than sheer opportunism using part of the political agenda of the British National Party and mixing it with contents that never had anything to do with British Nationalism.

More than once, Anne Maria Waters has found herself "in choppy seas", trying and failing to define a coherent agenda. On the one hand, she talks about keeping Britain British. On the other, she has a liberal agenda that goes very much against keeping Britain British. On the one hand, she states that she rejects the ways of the British National Party and of traditional British Nationalism and on the other hand she is surrounded by elements of the BNP that constitute the core of For Britain.

For a while, she had the support of British Nationalists, despite the fact that many of her stances go directly against fundamental values of British Nationalism. Having said that, the publication of a video launching a frontal attack against British Nationalists and using the usual tools used by others to misrepresent British Nationalism, she appears to have shot herself in the foot. Some comentators have indicated that the hatred she has expressed against Islam has more to do with her own sexual preferences than with a genuine attempt to keep Britain British. For Britain seems to be a one man band or, to put it more appropriately, a one woman band.

Essay:

"Nationalists up and down the country were struck with astonishment following publication, Friday April 10th, of a YouTube video by For Britain leader, Anne Marie Waters, attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative.

Questions are now being asked as to who - or what - could have triggered Ms Waters into humiliating herself and her party in a move that further deepens the divide between civic and ethno-nationalists.

To answer the question, we perhaps need to look at events dating back twelve months or so, when certain prominent figures within the Tommy Robinson and For Britain movements widened their reading lists to include works on the Frankfurt School and Holocaust Revisionism. One such notable figure, Shazia Hobbs, was a regular contributor to TR News - a website dedicated to Tommy Robinson, apparently run by staunch Tommy advocate and self-confessed "Nazi Jew", Avi Yemeni, currently residing in Australia. As Shazia's interest and knowledge increased, she published a feature on TR News entitled  "Hypocrisy". As most people know, the Tommy Robinson movement has no problem with any criticism of Islam; less so when the criticism is directed at Judaism. Without explanation, Shazia's article was quietly removed from the website by TR News editors.

Shortly after, Tommy again found himself behind bars. In a disastrous PR move, marking the beginning of the end for the Tommy movement, TR News published a video entitled "How to Burn a Nazi". The video was a brutal, unwarranted attack on Patriotic Alternative leader, Mark Collett, Shazia Hobbs and another former prominent Team Tommy activist, Dionne Møller aka Secret Sources. It's necessary to remind readers here that the video was published using the name of Tommy Robinson whilst Tommy himself was in prison. From then on, support for Tommy Robinson began to fade, which is hardly surprising. Tommy was seen to have stabbed some of his brightest and best elements in the back: elements who are true British patriots, born and bred in this country, unlike Avi of Oz and Brian of Tel Aviv.

At the same time, over the past few months, interest in ethno-nationalism and, in particular, Patriotic Alternative (PA) has increased, notably by way of contributions from a new wave of younger, talented content creators, who understand the plight facing future generations and who are motivated enough to seek and campaign for reasonable solutions. Citing the infamous 14 words, these youngsters, mainly inspired by Mark Collett, PA deputy leader Laura Towler and other prominent figures within PA circles, propose feasible strategies with which to tackle public opinion on the demographic crisis facing the British Isles and the west in general. Making the most out of the COVID19 Lockdown, for example, an army of online Groypers have been brigading suitable political targets. (Check out Natty's calls to LBC's Nick Ferrari and UNWAShED's livestreams on YouTube). Last month, the second ever Patriotic Alternative conference was held just outside London. The event was a huge success, attended by 200 smartly-dressed patriots from all walks of life and of all ages, with the youngest just 15 years of age.

Now, fast forward to Ms Waters' uncanny decision to put out a less vicious but nonetheless similar video to "How to burn a Nazi", attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative. As noted in the recent article on this blog, Ms Waters' and Tommy were - and possibly still are – quite close associates. Both follow the counter-jihad line, shrivelling in horror and squealing like leftists at the slightest mention of one particular ethnic community or of certain aspects of WW2 historiography.

The strategy used by Anne Marie Waters in her video - namely, to defame and smear her political rivals as "racists" who wish to "round up black people" – has backfired spectacularly, as seen by the swift removal of her video shortly after it had been shared on the TR News Telegram channel :
Presumably, someone ordered Avi Yemeni to take the video down. The YouTube original - where comments were originally disabled and then reactivated following complaints - has received a battering, both in the comments section and in the thumbs-up thumbs-down ratio. At the time of writing, there are just 800 likes to 1.6k dislikes.

So, why did Ms Waters choose to shoot herself and her own party in the foot? Was she badly advised by someone in her entourage? At the beginning of the video, filmed Friday morning, she mentions being flooded with messages about Patriotic Alternative and Mark Collett...

Certain sources appear to believe that Ms Waters was shown a photograph posted the previous evening on Facebook, showing Shazia Hobbs together with persecuted singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz in attendance at the recent PA conference.

No doubt that there are spies on Alison Chabloz’s Facebook page who sometimes send information to Hope Not Hate (HNH). Definite proof of this was seen last year when HNH Head of Intel, Matthew Collins, fished several of Alison's "friends only" posts from her timeline and then posted them on Twitter. The social media platform forced Collins to delete. But that is beside the point.

At the same time Ms Waters' published her video, the banner on her YouTube channel was changed. The banner now features a photograph of Ms Waters, also in the company of Shazia, taken at a 2016 demo.










Ms Waters' move provoked this reaction from Shazia:

To complicate matters further, Matthew Collins and the rest of the Hope Not Hate cabal aren't the only ones champing at the bit to have Alison Chabloz once again clamped in irons - for singing songs. Unlike Ms Waters and many other civic and ethno-nationalists, Alison has never been associated with the Tommy Robinson movement. On the contrary, her legal troubles are the direct result of Alison being targeted by people within Team Tommy, and in particular via the dirty deeds of Ambrosine Shitrit from London.

Mrs Shitrit is known to have financially supported Tommy fans, paying travel costs and hotels to ensure large crowds at pro-Tommy demos and court hearings. Indeed, the day Alison Chabloz was convicted, all the news headlines were grabbed... you've guessed it! - by Tommy Robinson getting himself arrested outside Leeds Crown Court. And that's not all: whilst Tommy was stealing media attention up in Leeds, a posse of his close associates, including Jonathan Hoffman and Sharon Klaff, rolled up outside Alison's court case, waving Israeli flags, cheering her conviction and displaying aggressive behaviour towards her supporters.

Who persuaded Tommy that it was a wise idea to go to Leeds that day, in possible breach of a court order..? - A move that did eventually see Tommy back in jail.

Admittedly, there is no evidence of Mrs Shitrit or Hope Note Hate sending the photo of Shazia and Alison at the Patriotic Alternative conference to Ms Waters. There is, however, a third possibility.

Readers will perhaps remember an ongoing Battle of Wills between Alison Chabloz and ex-model, Michele Renouf, which culminated in a series of defamatory articles about Alison, penned by two of Mrs Renouf's closest allies, Richard Edmonds and Peter Rushton. Four articles in total were published, labelling Alison as "a traitor and a saboteur", demanding her "surgical removal from movement circles" and even holding her responsible for the death of Professor Robert Faurisson (who was 89 years old at the time).

Last May, Rushton threatened to sue Alison Chabloz in a remarkable move that ensured he would no longer be able to mention her name without being immediately ridiculed.

Since then, others have carried the torch on behalf of Mrs Renouf, attempting to characterise Alison as a “leftist lover of Islam” whenever the opportunity arises. The schema, like the sockpuppetry, is predictable, as seen in this series of comments published by the same people under two videos, published six months' apart:

Note the comment above by "Jack Doe" (one of the pseudos used by ex-BNP electoral candidate, Julie Lake from Bristol) that Alison Chabloz would be "out of the loop"... It must have come as a nasty shock to learn that Alison Chabloz was welcomed by Mark and Laura into the Patriotic Alternative movement. The news also appears to have left Hope Not Hate speechless, for once. Furthermore, Alison's presence at the Patriotic Alternative conference and her work with the Patriotic Groypers must be absolutely devastating, both for Ambrosine Shitrit and for Michele Renouf.

These people will stop at nothing. Ambrosine Shitrit continues to lie and smear on social media and, worse still, the Rushton-Renouf camp appears to be spreading further damaging rumours that Mark Collett would be responsible for having caused a massive split in the movement. A sure sign of desperation and, of course, highly ironic, coming from those who are in fact responsible for having engineered the split in the first place. They didn't attend the PA conference, and they were not missed in the slightest.

This latest split in the movement is probably the best thing to have happened in British nationalist politics for over a decade. The chaff have sorted themselves out from the wheat, into their own little ghetto,  now further removed from the main stage of British nationalism than even the Team Tommy civ-nats.

We will probably never know who was responsible for tipping Anne Marie Waters over the edge and undermining any slim chance she has left of gaining authority and credibility. Natural justice has been served. Here and now, we as nationalists must focus on the essential and spread the 14 words: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

Source: Nationalist Forum

Nick Lowles: From Searchlight to Hope Not Hate to.... with a penchant for Islamophobia

Nick Lowles: From Searchlight to Hope Not Hate to.... with a penchant for Islamophobia

In 2016, the National Union of Students attempted to ban Nick Lowles to deny him a platform because he stood accused of Islamophobia. It has been reported that Nick Lowles is no longer the head of Hope Not Hate, in spite of the fact that articles signed by Nick Lowles are published by The Guardian. 

If such penchant for Islamophobia happens to be true, then Nick Lowles would have joined the likes of Nick Griffin, Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson that - surprise, surprise - stand accused of Islamophobia. 

Nick Lowles: Anti-Muslim campaigner?

To have spent quite a few years as an 'Anti-Racist' campaigner, ending up being accused of Islamophobia like many of those active in the so called Far Right seems a bit of a fall from grace.

On this day and age, perhaps the Security Services using new legislation should ask him his pins and numbers of all his electronic devices to find out what he actually up to.

I wonder if Nick Lowles has any links with Moscow. Having links with Moscow was the reason why the Security Services detained Paul Golding at Heathrow Airport and took him away with handcuffs when Paul Golding refused to deliver his pins and passwords. Trump charges for terrorism were made against Paul Golding that will be in Westminster Magistrates Court on February 27th 2020 at 2:00 o'clock to answer against the said charges in what is nothing more than another piece political persecution.

The British mass media and some British politicians want you believe that we live in a free country, but unfortunately when somebody who has absolutely nothing to do with terrorism and stands against terrorism is arrested, manhandled and falsely accused, all illusions of being in a free country fall overboard.

Every single piece of repressive legislation - like a knife - can be used for the right reasons and for the wrong reasons. When Jacqui Smith, then Home Secretary under a Labour goverment, introduce anti-terror legislation, voices were raised to caution against the certain possibility that anti-terror legislation could be misused. Nick Lowles was more interested in demonising and harassing those he didn't like and not even paid lip service to public freedoms. What Nick Lowles should take into account is that he himself could be targetted with the tools he used against others. The Porno Home Secretary - she and her husband used to claim Parliamentary expenses for pornography videos - took an active party in putting aside Habeas Corpus and the Presumption of Innocence, making possible to detain individuals without access to legal counsel. 

We live in a very strange world. Nowadays, regardless of ideology, race, gender, et cetera, you could end up in court accused of terrorism simply because you refuse to surrender access to your private information contained in electronic devices. We started fighting against terrorism and we ended up creating a terrorist state. And, once again, Nick Lowles was instrumental in the creation of a terrorist state.

  

  

British National Party finished? Not really.

British National Party finished? Not really.

Despite all the stataments made about the demise of the British National Party, it has never really gone away. In fact, as a political organisation it is now flourishing not having to deal with the usual barrage of attacks launched by mass media, para-political organisation and political parties whose agenda has been to prevent the rise of the British National Party.

Politics in Britain: When Politics is War

Politics in Britain: When Politics is War I have been following politics from a very early age. I have been in politics for more than half a century. I have in politics in the most extreme of circumstances. I have seen dirty tricks of all kinds and what happens in Britain today goes beyond dirty tricks. This is crowd manipulation when different standards are applied to every situation  If one side is harassed to the point of reacting it is said to be normal or even desirable. If those on the receiving end justifiably react when faced with harassment they are depicted as the aggressors.

Ezra Levant describes to perfection what is going on: Dear Karl, I hate watching the mainstream media cover Tommy Robinson’s election campaign to be the next Member of the European Parliament. The media is working hand-in-hand with Antifa rioters. Their street gangs attack Tommy when he’s out campaigning, but the media portray it as if Tommy’s the one causing trouble. Even worse, the police just stand back and let it all happen. They’d never let that happen to, say, Jeremy Corbyn. Those involved in demonising need to stop and think because their demonising campaign show very little respect or care for human life. There is a point when those in the mass media need to understand that as direct consequence of their kind of reporting people will get killed. Replace milkshakes with something else and you will see the picture. As we see people carrying knives and killing other people, it is also easy to imagine a disturbed individual knifing to death a candidate or a political activist or a journalist. A Journalist carries with him or her an enormous responsibility. A Police officer carries with him or her an enormous responsibility. When a Police officer stands aside, doing nothing for political reasons, a Police officer is failing in his or her duty of care. With every new incident, danger levels rise. We can continue passing legislation to presumably prevent Extremism but politicians and mass media are fomenting Extremism by promoting messages that exclude people simply because they - politicians and mass media - have a political agenda. The more we exclude people, the more disenfranchised people become, the more Extremism there will be. There is a point when frustration leads to anger and anger leads to violence. And this is exactly what is happening right now. The more repressive legislation becomes the more the potential for violence grows. You might not agree with a man like Tommy Robinson. You are duly entitled to disagree with anybody. You are not entitled to harass, attack or demonise anybody simply because you don't agree. Harassment, demonising, discrimination and even violence perpetrated against people the Political Establishment and the Mass Media that follow the Political Establishment don't like have become acceptable. This is not an environment for peaceful coexistence.

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties hypocrisy

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties' hypocrisy

Gerard Batten and Tommy Robinson

Gerard Batten's Dilemma was created by Nigel Farage when Nigel Farage - without questioning - surrendered UKIP to Political Correctness. Why? All other political parties have former BNP members, former NF members, former EDL members and even former IRA members.

The Labour Party has the highest numbers of BNP, NF and EDL former members. In fact, Jeremy Corbyn was elected and re-affirmed as Labour Party Leader with BNP, NF and EDL former members votes.

The BBC didn't look into it. SKY News didn't look into it. They just focused on UKIP to chastise UKIP for something all other political parties have done. A former IRA members represents the Conservative Party in Greater London.

Today, the House of Commons and everything around the Houses of Parliament had to do with Brexit and the votes on a series of amendments presented by both Government and Opposition. I met Gerard Batten and spoke with him about these issues directly. Why? Because the London Regional Press Office asks questions directly. I met Gerard Batten near the House of Commons and we spoke about these issues and the fact that Tommy Robinson contracted as Adviser cannot stand for election representing UKIP because he is not a member of UKIP and he is not a member of UKIP because UKIP's Membership Rules explicitly excludes former members of the BNP and of EDL. Tommy Robinson was a BNP member and was also an EDL member.

But there is another paradox. Despite the fact that officially UKIP Membership Rules exclude former members of BNP, and EDL from becoming members of UKIP, UKIP has members that were at one point in time members of BNP, NF and EDL. How did this happen? Well, those who were not publicly known members of BNP, NF and EDL existed under the radar. 

As Gerard Batten explained to me personally in a face to face conversation, UKIP introduced the said Membership Rules to avoid being infiltrated by BNP, NF and EDL and others.

Nobody knows for certain what will happen on March 29th 2019. Nobody knows what will happen before March 29th 2019. What is certain is that a group of minority parties are struggling to get the support of individuals that occupy practically the same segment of public opinion. The announcement by Nigel Farage that he wants to create a new political party doesn't help. In fact, it divides even more those who share certain political views. 

What will happen when issues like Abortion come to the fore? What will happen when they have to decide on Economic Policies or Foreign Affairs? Will minority parties maintain the same level of support they have until now? They might be united with regards to Islam or Immigration? Will they be united when it comes to a whole range of others issues that any political party has to deal with?

   

Nigel Farage says bye bye to UKIP

Nigel Farage says bye bye to UKIP

Tommy Robinson pushes Nigel Farage out of UKIP. Although this statement might not be accurate in terms of what actually happened the end result is exactly the same. 

Unless Arron Banks has the will to create a new political force with Nigel Farage in it, the future looks uncertain from a political point of view. March 29, 2019 is also the political end of Nigel Farage as Member of the European Parliament. Without a seat in the European Parliament, without a political party to belong to, Nigel Farage will just Nigel Farage the LBC radio presenter, but for how long?

The same goes for many other politicians of other political parties that will have to redefine what will be their daily routine. Back to business and most probably out of politics for good. Accusing UKIP of having become BNP because of having Tommy Robinson as an adviser was a very low point for Nigel Farage, especially looking at UKIP's membership criteria that are more stringent that the membership criteria of all other political parties. The Conservative Party has former BNP members. The Labour Party has former BNP members. UKIP was targeted by the Political Establishment and the mass media that put UKIP on the spot while forgetting that other political parties' requirements didn't exclude former BNP members.

Now For Britain Leader Anne Marie Waters was a member of UKIP and For Britain has former BNP members. No problems there. So all the talk about Extremists and Fascists doesn't apply. The use of the labels Extremist and Fascist is merely a tool to discriminate against political opponents and such labels are not representative of political reality.

If Nigel Farage didn't want Tommy Robinson to become an adviser working for UKIP, why did Nigel Farage walk away when he was UKIP Leader? If he had stayed as Leader he would have ensured that Tommy Robinson could not become an adviser working for UKIP. 

You don't strive to get Britain out of the European Union to then transform Britain into an Islamic Republic.   

Jayda Fransen: going through hell for the sake of the truth

Jayda Fransen: going through hell for the sake of the truth

This is Jayda Fransen using one of the most powerful weapons known to man: a microphone. Why? To tell things as they are, not as the Political Establishment wants the public to believe that they are.

Marxist Wikipedia calls her a Fascist. Well, if denouncing gang rape of British children ignored for a very long time by politicians and Police forces for fear of being called Racists is Fascism we should all be Fascists.

In Rotherham and in many other cities across the United Kingdom gangs mostly made up of Pakistani Muslims terrorised thousands of children that were drugged, plied with alcohol and pass around to satisfy the sexual needs of individuals some of whom are now being arrested, put on trial and convicted as it is vox populi because their names and image has been publicised by mass media and the press.

Denoncing crime and expressing rejection of crime is not a crime but it seems to have become a crime when individuals like Jayda Fransen are persecuted, harassed, arrested and jailed for daring to speak the truth. No sooner Jayda Fransen was released draconian bail conditions were imposed including Jayda Fransen being forced to live in a hostel sharing space with drug addicts, pedophiles and other common criminals -just a continuation of what she had to endure when she was in jail surrounded by Muslim criminals.

The fact the Probation Service involved didn't allow her to live in her own home speaks volumes about the way processes are being used for political persecution against those the Political Establishment doesn't like because they remind the Political Establishment of the failures of the Political Establishment.

Jayda Fransen is forced to live in fear because any excuse - even the most ridiculous and irrational reason - can be used by the Probation Service to demand her arrest for her to be sent to jail.

When you stand for the truth, when you stand for justice, you automatically become a marked person as I myself experienced on my way to Moscow, Russian Federation, on a family trip and a few days later, once again, in my own home when I was subjected to political interrogation. Unfortunately for the MI5 agents sent to talk to me, I have no political involvement. I am a researcher in the areas of politics, data gathering and military strategy and tactics.

I referred the matter to a Member of Parliament that did the proper enquiries but the government was less than candid about MI5 political involvement in the United Kingdom. I am not talking about counter-terrorism. I am talking about using British Security Services for political persecution - when laws and procedures can be bent for political purposes and Police Forces become Political Police.

  

MI5: Political Correctness is compromising National Security

MI5: Political Correctness is compromising National Security

Using MI5 for political purposes due to Political Correctness is an absurdity. The damming report that came to light today about the fact that the Security Services failed to protect members of the public because they did not track down the Muslim Terrorist that killed scores of innocent people at a public arena in Manchester says it all. Dame Stella Rimington spoke loudly and clearly about the fact that the Security Services do not have the manpower necessary to follow every lead and track down every Muslim Terrorist in the United Kingdom.

Why then using MI5 for the purposes of political persecution and harassment against individuals who are not a terrorist threat? Well, you need to read the pages of Hope Not Hate, UAF and some pages of so called mainstream newspapers where individuals like Lizzie Dearden divert attention from the real threats by constantly attacking individuals who are not a terrorist threat but are classified as a terrorist threat because it serves the purposes of malign left-wing journalists and malign left-wing and liberal politicians.

If because of left-wing mental retards the Security Services are forced to divert resources away from where they are really needed then you have to conclude that people like Lizzie Dearden and others are promoting terrorism and have blood in their hands when stressed Security Services cannot track down the real threats.

Legislation meant to be used to tackle Muslim Terrorism is now being used to persecute and/or harass and/or imprison British Nationalists who campaign against the Islamic Terrorist Threat as Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and other know very well because of their own experiences. 

Is Tommy Robinson a Security Threat? No, he isn't. Is Paul Golding a Security Threat? No, he isn't. Is Jayda Fransen a Security Threat? No, she isn't. In spite of this, they are constantly persecuted, defamed and subjected to all kinds of ill treatment.

As long as Political Correctness is the driving force behind many of the actions undertaken by Security Services, the lives of ordinary Britons will be in danger and as it happened in Manchester lives will be lost. Left-Wing Journalism has become a disease. Left-Wing Journalism has made itself a National Security Threat. 

National Action infiltrated British Armed Forces under Amber Rudd's Watch as Home Secretary

National Action infiltrated British Armed Forces under Amber Rudd's Watch as Home Secretary

The news that elements of National Action infiltrated the British Armed Forces is actually no news at all. For a very long time, elements of the British Armed Forces have been training British para-military groups in several locations in the United Kingdom.

When you have an individual like Amber Rudd in charge you can expect a lot worse to happen. She was incompetent as Home Secretary and this is why she was forced to resign.Why putting Amber Rudd back again in the Cabinet? Because of desperation. She banned National Action. So what? Did she expect that those involved in National Action would be deterred by her legal action? Did she really think that banning National Action things were going to go back to what they were before?

Nothing happens in the lower ranks of any military organisation without the knowledge of the Middle Ranks and this raises very serious questions. To what extent Junior Military Officers respond to National Action? They are armed and they have what it takes. The high ranks of the Chilean Army were oblivious to the designs of General Augusto Pinochet until the very last minute and I suspect that something very similar is happening within the British Armed Forces. The Political Establishment didn't have a clue. Allende was a sitting duck and his top Generals were totally unaware of what was coming. Parliament was easily wiped out because the reality is that Politicians have no real power and if there is a coup most politicians would be running for cover. The mass media operators would follow because they wouldn't want to be shot down. What would happen? The mass media would very quickly 'join in' and seek 'an accommodation deal' to continue to operate.

Those of us who lived through a military coup and dictatorship know how things develop and I am seeing the tell tale signs of things to come.  What individuals like Amber Rudd did was to push people underground thus making them a lot more dangerous. They don't need a name to continue to operate. You need a name if you are a political organisation including a political party willing to stand in elections. Elements of National Action don't want to stand in elections and anonymity is one of their best assets. All National Action is to place sympathetic elements within structures of power and this includes the Armed Forces. They will have people working within the Police and other strategic organisations.

Why the Establishment keeps pestering and targeting individuals like Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen? Because they are publicly known and easily targeted. How do you target people whose existence you are not aware of? You don't because you cannot. They are invisible. They could be standing next to you and you wouldn't be aware of what they are planning to do. I guess Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi paid the ultimate price because of their lack of awareness and the Political Establishment could be about to learn a very harsh lesson and they should be thinking about Jo Cox MP. Did her position as Member of Parliament save her life?

Labour Party is more extreme that National Front, BNP and EDL

And this are the people accusing National Front, British National Party, EDL, Tommy Robinson, Jez Turner, Alison Chabloz, Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen, Nick Griffin and many others of being Racists, Fascists, Nazis, and of many other things.

The UAF, Hope Not Hate, and Antifa - to name a few, are dangerous organisations that demonise, persecute, harass, discriminate against and even attack innocent people simply because they hold different political ideas.

Those who have been unjustly treated have got organised and will counter attack where it hurts. I have been shown databases of well-known names and background information of what they have been up to to show them for what they really are.

It is basically a methodical approach to continue what started with lists of politicians who had been involved in sexual crimes and financial crimes but it goes a lot farther than that. Several Members of Parliament were ousted. Keith Vaz and his affairs with male escorts, Denis McShane and his false declarations of Parliamentary Expenses, Jacqui Smith and the cost of pornographic material paid as Parliamentary Expenses.

If you a member of Antifa, UAF, Hope Not Hate or any other organisation that go around defaming, libelling, persecuting, harassing and attacking those who are falsely accused of being Racists, Fascists and Nazis, you have many reasons to be afraid. They are going to come after you. There might something that you don't want the public to know about your personal life or something that you have done that have violated existing laws. Whatever you have done will be publicly known and you will face criminal charges for any crimes that you might have committed.

United Kingdom: Left-Wing thugs go on the rampage and where there is action there is going to be reaction

Whatever your views about UKIP or any other political party or personality, attacks, harassment, intimidation and persecution are criminal activities. Those who go around engaging in criminal activities will find themselves facing the wrong end of a gun.

The Political Establishment and the Mass Media are all too ready to launch attacks against those who do not fit in with their political agenda. Mass Media reporting is extremely biased and constantly misrepresents those that they don't like.

What happened to UKIP activists in Leicester, England, United Kingdom is not new. It has been happening on a regular basis and is promoted by certain mass media including some BBC operators that are part of a network of organisations.

After each Tommy Robinson's rally, you will find camera crews and photographers ready to capture any actions that they would later depict under the headline 'Far Right Thugs engage in Violence'.

Police Crews are placed strategically to video and photograph those attending rallies and Police crews are briefed in a very negative manner about the people that they are going to find during rallies. They are mentally programmed to react in a negative manner against people whose sole crime is to take part in a peaceful demonstration.

Those who report about the Storm Troopers of the 1930s conveniently fail to remember that there were so called Red Brigades that were always looking for a fight. The Storm Troopers and the Red Brigades existed because of the actions of those acting like the Political Establishment and the Mass Media are acting today.

When Jo Cox MP was killed, we heard choirs of expressions of grief inside and outside Parliament of those who condemned political violence. Paradoxically, when violence is exerted against another side of the political spectrum they are very willing to justify attacks against UKIP and other political organisations.

More than once individuals like Nigel Farage, Tommy Robinson and others have been targeted because of the messages of hatred spread by the Political Establishment and the mass media including the British Broadcasting Corporation. Listening to John Bercow as Speaker of the House of Commons and to other Members of Parliament you realise that there is a hatred campaign promoted from the very top.

This is not just about Hope Not Hate or the UAF that I renamed Hate Not Hope and United Against Freedom whose followers I have seen attacking political opponents using balaclavas and baseball bats.

Unless attitudes change and violence of all political colours is publicly rejected, unless the Political Establishment, the Mass Media and para political organisations do realise that there is going to be a boomerang effect, we are going to reach a point in which the political environment will be completely out of control and action will be followed by reaction.

Far too many British journalists have an agenda and very seldom offer a true account of what is actually happening

Whether it is the BBC, Sky News or other interested mass media, the fact is that far too many British journalists have an agenda and very seldom offer a true account of what is actually happening. Ezra Levant, a Canadian journalist was in London to witness and to report about what is really happening regarding the legal process against Tommy Robinson. Let's be clear. This is not about justice. It is about persecution of an individual that continues to talk about a developing scandalous series of events involving Muslim communities in the United Kingdom and the way some of their members are behaving engaging in gang rape, paedophilia, drug trafficking and various others criminal activities.

Coming from Muslims, gang rape, paedophilia and drug trafficking are not merely ordinary crimes. They are linked to the declared aims of a terrorist ideology that preaches violence against non Muslims. For a very long time, figures of the political establishment and especially from the Labour Party and the Police went to great lengths to hide what was happening across several British cities. Those who raised the alert were labelled 'Racist, Nazi, Fascist, Xenophobe, Islamophobe'. The British Broadcasting Corporation that itself was trying to hide sexual crimes by people that the BBC employed as 'celebrities' had no interest in talking about crimes committed by Muslims because they didn't fit in the ideological rhetoric of the BBC concerning what they call Multiculturalism. Anybody who dared to talk about crimes committed by Muslims was immediately classified as Far Right or Extremist when the real Extremists where Muslims involved in criminal activities.

When the BBC and others, including Members of Parliament, finally started talking about the issues, they referred to the culprits calling them Asian Gangs to try and divert attention away from the real culprits. Asian people who had nothing to do with what was going on were blamed when in fact the crimes were being committed by Muslims and many of the said Muslims had a Pakistani background.

Today, the activities of criminal Muslim gangs are so widespread that denial is no longer possible. Having said that, the attacks by mass media against people who continue to campaign against Muslim criminals continue. Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen, Tommy Robinson and others are classified as Extremist, Racist, Fascist and the like.

The Speaker of the House of Commons (John Bercow) and some Labour MPs (political party that historically protected paedophiles) use Parliamentary Immunity to spread venom against those who stand against Muslim Criminals. This is happening at a time when Members of Parliament themselves -including John Bercow - stand accused of gross misconduct.

The pictures of those arrested, put on trial and convicted are just the tip of the iceberg. Whether we talk about religious criminals and/or religious terrorists, British Security Services have denounced that they don't have enough manpower to follow every lead. 

There is a gross inconsistency. On the one hand, those who raise the alert about the dangers of having Muslim criminals living in the United Kingdom are persecuted. On the other hand, vast amounts of money and other resources are spent on a daily basis to cope with the risks of having Muslim criminals in the United Kingdom in a country in which 85% per cent of inmates are Muslim and prisons are being used by criminals to indoctrinate and recruit individuals that when free would become involved in acts of terrorism.    

Tommy Robinson: Defamed and Libelled by Members of Parliament

Tommy Robinson: Defamed and Libelled by Members of Parliament

Whoever hides behind Parliamentary Immunity to launch a tirade of insults, defamation and libel against a private citizen whose sin is to have denounced abuses against children committed by Muslim paedophiles is a bloody coward and this does not surprise me.

Coming from a Labour Party that for more than sixteen years looked the other way when children were plied with alcohol and drugs to be gang raped, it couldn't surprise at all.

This is the same Labour Party who had a Home Secretary called Jacqui Smith that declared the acquisition of pornographic videos as part of Parliamentary Expenses.

The same Labour Party that had an illustrious and prominent Member of Parliament called Denis McShane who lied to Parliament about his Parliamentary Expenses. Denis McShane was forced by the British National Party and by its Sleaze Buster Michael Barnbrook to resign his seat in the House of Commons. 

The same Labour Party who had a War Criminal as Prime Minister called Tony Blair, a true Weapon of Mass Destruction, that complete destabilised the Middle East leading to the rise of Islamic State - the same Islamic State that is very much loved by some Muslims living in Britain that force the British People to live in fear and the country to invest vast amounts of money that should be invested in Health, Education, Transport and Housing and other segments of the British economy.

Under the Labour Party, Britain imported vast numbers of terrorists that launched attacks in the United Kingdom and have also used Britain to launch attacks elsewhere. 

I have met Tommy Robinson in numerous occasions. I have heard him talking to the crowds in the United Kingdom and never ever has he incited any kind of racial hatred. He has never incited people to commit violence on his behalf. People of all races follow Tommy Robinson. Sectors of the Jewish Community support Tommy Robinson and this at a time when the Labour Party stands accused of hatred against Jews.

This is the same Labour Party that supported terrorists that were killing British Police Officers, British Soldiers, British Politicians and ordinary citizens across the United Kingdom.

Those who launch attacks hiding behind Parliamentary Immunity are cowards and don't deserve to be Members of Parliament.    

Lizzie Dearden: When ideology supersedes reporting

Lizzie Dearden: When ideology supersedes reporting

When newspapers' bosses ask themselves why the numbers of newspaper copies sold fell dramatically, they need to have a closer look at the trends of the articles that they print. One cannot fail to spot the fact that many writers like Lizzie Dearden seem to be ideologically driven and that therefore the copies that they produce and their reporting style is not about genuine reporting.They have a case to prove. 

Reporting about legal cases is not about reporting.It is about character assassination. This is pretty bad journalism. When I read a paper, I want real reporting. I want to hear all sides of a story and I want the said reporting to be focused on the case in hand. I don't want a novel in which the author is trying to prove that the person they are reporting about is a very bad person. In so doing, reporting is no longer reporting. It becomes purely and simply propaganda. The Independent was forced out of circulation because not enough copies were being sold to justify the costs of printing and distribution. Now, the The Independent is just an Internet concern.

It is a great idea to have a public forum where people can express their views freely and The Independent has had some success becoming the newspaper version of Facebook. Unfortunately, those in charge have made some mistakes along the way. Whether you want to report about Tommy Robinson or Brexit or whatever else, reporting should not be partisan. The Independent is clearly biased when it comes to reporting about Tommy Robinson and is officially partisan when reporting about Brexit since the paper launched a campaign against Brexit. Once again, when I am thinking about paying for a service, I will definitely be against paying for a service when instead of reporting I am going to get a pamphlet. From a commercial standpoint, a partisan organisation stands to lose money. 

People like Alexander Lebedev and Evgeny Lebedev have very high profiles but their actions seem to be at odds with what is published by The Independent. They reportedly have regular meetings with the Prime Minister and the Chancellor and have an ongoing relationship with Ruppert Murdoch , Nigel Farage and Liam Fox. Alexander Lebedev reportedly closed a newspaper because the said publication criticised Vladimir Putin, was in United Russia Party in support of President Putin and stated that Vladimir Putin is one thousand times more genius than Winston Churchill.

In the running of The Independent there seems to be a system in place, not much different from the systems applied by secret services when what you see is more often than not what they want you to see and not what is really happening. 

Whenever there is an opportunity to bash President Putin and the Russian Federation, Members of Parliament rise to the occasion to depict President Putin and the Russian Federation as evil. Not long ago, Britain expelled Russian diplomats and staff and denied a visa to Roman Abramovich and statements were made about countering Russian interference in British Affairs and we have a former member of the late  KGB and his son and - both supporters of President Putin - being members of the British political scene.

Very often the Houses of Parliament are a bit of a theatre where paid actors play a certain role in a certain play. Everything is not always what it seems. The Independent and its reports fit perfectly in that kind of political circus. The problem is that nowadays we need clarity. We don't need a circus nor a theatre. A digital publication that purports to be a newspaper should be a real newspaper and not a propaganda machine. 

Britain needs real journalism. BBC, SKY and others simply add to extraordinary levels of confusion, distortion and disinformation. Practically all publications and mass media have lost followers. If organisations like the BBC had to survive with their own means, the BBC would have gone the way of Woolworths, Maplin and other private companies. The call by the UKIP Independence Party to get rid of  the TV License sends a clear message but we know that without political power things will remain as they are.

  

Tommy Robinson Far Right? Mmmmm..... No.

Tommy Robinson Far Right? Mmmm..... No.

The heads of the British Armed Forces have lost the plot very much like the British mass media and the political establishment.

To define Tommy Robinson as Far Right is an absurdity. Far Right is an ideological label and nothing of what Tommy Robinson says is ideological but, as usual, anybody who stands for Britain ends up being called Nazi, Fascist, Racist, Xenophobe and who knows what else.

We learnt that the boy soldier that took the picture is going to be thrown out of the Armed Forces. Yet another absurdity. The boys in the picture are the ones who are going to end up dead fighting for Britain and they are treated like rubbish when they are soldiers and will be treated like rubbish when they end up homeless and/or mentally ill and/or disabled while the ones they fight against - the followers of the Religion of Peace - get older cashing in from the exploitation of the cash cows some call wives and the children they bring into the world.

A statement issued by the Armed Forces indicates that 'they would not tolerate Far Right supporters' and 'Far Right supporters would not be allowed to serve'. My message to the bosses of the Armed Forces involved in this charade is 'you are barking at the wrong tree'. Who would be allowed to serve - if they wanted to serve? The killers of Lee Rigby? The one who killed PC Keith Palmer while one  of PC Keith Palmer's bosses was hiding inside his car like a fucking coward? Do the bosses of the Armed Forces really think that the followers of the Religion of Peace will stand up for Britain?

How many Multicultural individuals are there standing in the picture? None. Why? Because the reality of the British Armed Forces is that the vast majority of those who are going to be sent out to die are white British boys and girls. You children are sent out to die to make space so that the scum of the Religion of Peace live happily ever after at the expense of British taxpayers.

How much money and how many resources, are being spent to keep Britain safe simply because the scum of the Religion of Peace is roaming around without a care in the world? There was a time when the corpses of British soldiers were paraded on the streets so that the British public could honour the fallen. Not anymore. With every passing day, the words 'We shall remember them' sound increasingly worthless and meaningless.   

 

Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!

Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!

The Windrush Scandal brought Amber Rudd down but her incompetence was shown long before. I knew Jack Renshaw and many of those accused of being members of National Action. None of them would be capable of any acts of terrorism. The whole thing has been a shameful circus for political posturing.

About 85% of inmates in British jails are Muslim. What does this tell you about what is going on? Then came the reports that more whites are being arrested and charged with terrorism. Why? Because they had to use Police Forces to show that they were not being unduly harsh with Muslim criminals. The fact of the matter remains that all those murdered in terrorists acts in the United Kingdom have been killed by Muslim criminals or Muslim converts. Lee Rigby was killed by Muslim converts. A Police Officer was slaughtered in Westminster stabbed by a Muslim convert. Not a single person has been killed by a white terrorists because there are no white terrorists.

Liberals and Marxists want to justify their ideological stances by blaming innocent whites and pursue their campaign of ethnic cleansing that is destroying Europe. ethnic cleansing that will lead to war and to the disintegration of democratic institutions that has taken centuries to forge.

It took centuries for women to be able to vote. Muslims treat women as slaves or at best as second or third class individuals. Many of them believe that they have to deliberately damage women's bodies with the so called Female Genital Mutilation or that they have to be hidden, covered with bed clothing when they walk on the streets. An Asian Lady Peer denounced that Muslim men were importing women to use them as cash cows by exploiting the welfare state by claiming benefits for children of several wives.

Many Muslims believe and they speak openly about it that women only exist to pleasure men. The promise of tens of virgins to deliver sexual pleasures to those who blow up themselves for Allah more than proves the extraordinary disregard for women to be seen not as wives and mothers but as objects to be exploited. They not even respect their own daughters to the point that for ages there have been ongoing investigations about forced marriages and about girls that have been killed or have had to escape, to run away from their families, because they felt that their lives were in danger. This is the Islam, the so called culture, that Liberals and Marxists want to impose on us.

For more than sixteen years, Police and Politicians looked the other way while thousands of vulnerable children were raped and drugged by Muslim gangs and those raising the alert were accused of racism. Instead of protecting vulnerable children, for the said Police Officers and Politicians it was more important to protect their positions at the expense of vulnerable children and they wilfully protected Muslim criminals.

The rage against Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, against Nick Griffin and others is that they not only denounced Muslim depravity and terrorism. They have actively campaigned against Muslim depravity and Muslim Terrorism. The Security Services themselves say on a regular basis that they are quashing terror attempt after terror attempt of Muslim Terrorists and when they failed to do so people died. Lee Rigby was beheaded by people that the Security Services were trying to recruit. They couldn't foil attacks in London and Manchester and people died. We have Hate Priests using public spaces, Mosques and Cultural Centres to spread hatred against Non Muslims. Not only that. We have jails being used to promote Muslim Terrorism. 

The real terrorists have not been members of organisations like National Action. The real terrorists have been supported by Liberals and Marxists.

The icing on the cake was Amber Rudd's actions during the Windrush Scandal. She deliberately lied to Parliament about the immigration shambles in which documents were destroyed and families who came to Britain in good faith have been made to suffer. Whether dealing with Terrorism or dealing immigration, Amber Rudd was not fit for purpose and now she is trying to rock the boat to ignore the will of the British People that in a democratic exercise decided to leave the European Union.