Gary Lineker: Using the BBC for political agendas

 

For a long time, there has been criticism regarding BBC Superstars and the fact that they are overlypaid when the coorportation has been downsizing and cutting down services.

Not a year goes by without hearing announcements regarding services being cut off to save money and it is not any money. It is about money gathered because people most of whom do not watch the BBC are forced to pay under duress.

Despite the fact the he made a name because of football, Gary Lineker has very well known political views and political allegiances. If we want a BBC that is seen as impartial, Gary Lineker is not the best exponent of such impartiality and perhaps, and without perhaps, this led the BBC to make the decision not to allow the presenter to host a very public football programme. His twitter comments led to confrontation and even division between peoples that hold similar political views. Exponents of the Jewish Communities in the UK have shown that they are not happy - in some cases that they are deeply unhappy - to hear or see that the experiences of 70 or so years ago are being used for party political purposes in the United Kingdom. Is this a watershed moment? Are people tired enough of seeing words like Nazi, Fascist, Racist, Homophobe, Transphobe used to prevent any qualified debate about many of today's issues and ills?

Gary Lineker is not a Member of Parliament. Perhaps he should consider leaving the BBC, stopping being a sports presenter, and engage in politics full on. Then he could talk about politics using his own steam instead of using his presence as presenter of a public broadcaster to promote his views. It is become apparent that many communities in the United Kingdom are not happy when they are flooded with illegal immigrant centres and their local economies that were already in trouble before their hospitality industry was used for purposes that have nothing to do with the reasons why the hospitality industry was created. Calling disgruntled and desperate local communities Far Right or Racist is in itself a form of abuse. Local inhabitants become hostages of circumstances beyond their control. They become victims of decisions made by political groups that are not to have to cope with the repercusions of their decisions. 

What is happening in many local communities across the United Kingdom shows, once again, the disconnect between the well-off and the poorer segments of society. The said centres are not set up in well-off areas. The said centres are set up in the poorest areas of Britain. Rich Liberals and Champagne Socialists are condemning the poorest in Britain to live in conditions that Rich Liberals and Champagne Socialist would not want to live in.  

When courts are used to cancel the fair outcome of an election, democracy is gone

When courts are used to cancel the fair outcome of an election, Democracy is gone

The cancelation of Brexit is the worst possible outcome for all. Parliament was already downgraded in peoples' eyes. For a second, it seemed that trust in Parliament was going to be restored when Article 50 was triggered and it appeared that Parliament was going to respect the will of the Electorate. The romance was short lived when the corrupt gangs showed their true colours.

The greatest fraud is the Scottish National Party that pretends to stand for Scotland's interest when in fact it is selling Scotland down the drain, transferring powers from Westminster to an unelected mafia that will ultimately lead the European Continent to a disastrous war. They pretend to stand for the British people when in fact they couldn't care less about Britain. They openly campaign for the partition of Britain. It is their lifetime goal. 

They are followed at close range by the Liberal Democrats - a travestu of a political party that goes where the wind blows playing for position. All principles were thrown away to form a coalition with the Conservative Party that generated the procedural mess Britain is in today. The Fixed Term Parliament Act was born out of that mess. Had not been for the Fixed Term Parliament Act, Britain would be having a General Election to at least try to clear the air.

The next in line is the Labour Party. Another fraud. For decades they have been calling Nazi, Fascist, and Racist their political opponents. The attacked National Front, British National Party, UKIP and of recent the Conservatives and the Brexit Party using such labels. Well, the real Jew haters are in the Labour Party and very much in control of the Labour Party.

The British political system is not dysfunctional because of the electoral system. It is dysfunctional because it is controlled by rotten and crooked individuals supported by mass media that are equally rotten and crooked..The direct consequence has been the degradation of Democracy in Britain. 

Jo Brand and the BBC: One too many in what constitutes incitement to violence

Jo Brand and the BBC: One too many in what constitutes incitement to violence

Jo Brand and the BBC

Speaking on Radio 4, Jo Brand made a comment that constitutes incitement to violence. We are not going to mention the comment she made because what she suggested is basically promoting criminal violence for political purposes.

Telling jokes is one thing. Using the BBC to promote violence is quite another and nowhere in the BBC Charter it is suggested that the public broadcaster can or should engage giving a platform to individuals to promote criminal activities.

Sooner than later, laughing at the act of throwing milkshakes against people merely because of not sharing their views was bound to lead to what Jo Brand laughed about. We have seen elderly people thrown out to the ground by angry mobs shouting expletives and being insulting.

An NHS nurse lost her job looking after people with mental health problems because she lost the plot right in front of the Houses of Parliament and ended up apologising for what she had done. She had the excuse of being driven by crowd madness but Jo Brand had no excuse whatsoever to say what she said. She knew exactly what she said and the potential repercussion of what she said.

When Jeremy Corbyn's supporters shouted at this young black man holding an Israeli flag and supporting President Trump saying that his black man is racist, Nazi, Fascist and the like, something is very wrong. Who encourages people to engage in such behaviour? We should ask journalists and activist like Owen Jones about it, as one the most vociferous individuals on print, on television and on the streets. His ideological stances go all over the top and this has consequences in an increasingly tense political environment in which unstable individuals can easily get carried away by the messages he is sending out. The careless attitude in terms of what they say and do is something that Jo Brand shares with Owen Jones. They are agitators that don't seem to care about the consequences and especially when other people can get hurt. 

Owen Jones

The Guardian: Jewish Brexit Party Candidate and Swastika

The Guardian: Jewish Brexit Party Candidate and Swastika

How many times the UAF, Hope Not Hate, politicians and mass media have called those supporting Brexit Nazi, Fascist, Racist et cetera, et cetera?

But... and it is a big BUT, oh surprise, Jewish people are standing as candidates for the Brexit Party and therefore the UAF, Hope Not Hate, politicians and mass media are calling Jewish people Nazi, Facist, Racist et cetera et cetera.

Now, none other than The Guardian is publicly stating that those who are are campaigning for Brexit are not Nazi, are not Fascist, are not Racist and that all crap spread by UAF, Hope Not Hate, politicians and mass media against those who stand in favour of leaving the European Union is crap. 

The constant labelling of politicians because of their positions regarding the relationship with the European Union is precisely what led to a Jewish candidate being called Nazi. I say that not only those who painted the Swastika should be investigated. The UAF should be investigated. Hope Not Hate should be investigated. UNITE should be investigated. All those who call British politicians whose only crime is to stand for what they believe in a Democratic society should be investigated because every time somebody is called a Nazi is the equivalent of painting a Swastika on the face of the said individual.

Far too many British journalists have an agenda and very seldom offer a true account of what is actually happening

Whether it is the BBC, Sky News or other interested mass media, the fact is that far too many British journalists have an agenda and very seldom offer a true account of what is actually happening. Ezra Levant, a Canadian journalist was in London to witness and to report about what is really happening regarding the legal process against Tommy Robinson. Let's be clear. This is not about justice. It is about persecution of an individual that continues to talk about a developing scandalous series of events involving Muslim communities in the United Kingdom and the way some of their members are behaving engaging in gang rape, paedophilia, drug trafficking and various others criminal activities.

Coming from Muslims, gang rape, paedophilia and drug trafficking are not merely ordinary crimes. They are linked to the declared aims of a terrorist ideology that preaches violence against non Muslims. For a very long time, figures of the political establishment and especially from the Labour Party and the Police went to great lengths to hide what was happening across several British cities. Those who raised the alert were labelled 'Racist, Nazi, Fascist, Xenophobe, Islamophobe'. The British Broadcasting Corporation that itself was trying to hide sexual crimes by people that the BBC employed as 'celebrities' had no interest in talking about crimes committed by Muslims because they didn't fit in the ideological rhetoric of the BBC concerning what they call Multiculturalism. Anybody who dared to talk about crimes committed by Muslims was immediately classified as Far Right or Extremist when the real Extremists where Muslims involved in criminal activities.

When the BBC and others, including Members of Parliament, finally started talking about the issues, they referred to the culprits calling them Asian Gangs to try and divert attention away from the real culprits. Asian people who had nothing to do with what was going on were blamed when in fact the crimes were being committed by Muslims and many of the said Muslims had a Pakistani background.

Today, the activities of criminal Muslim gangs are so widespread that denial is no longer possible. Having said that, the attacks by mass media against people who continue to campaign against Muslim criminals continue. Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen, Tommy Robinson and others are classified as Extremist, Racist, Fascist and the like.

The Speaker of the House of Commons (John Bercow) and some Labour MPs (political party that historically protected paedophiles) use Parliamentary Immunity to spread venom against those who stand against Muslim Criminals. This is happening at a time when Members of Parliament themselves -including John Bercow - stand accused of gross misconduct.

The pictures of those arrested, put on trial and convicted are just the tip of the iceberg. Whether we talk about religious criminals and/or religious terrorists, British Security Services have denounced that they don't have enough manpower to follow every lead. 

There is a gross inconsistency. On the one hand, those who raise the alert about the dangers of having Muslim criminals living in the United Kingdom are persecuted. On the other hand, vast amounts of money and other resources are spent on a daily basis to cope with the risks of having Muslim criminals in the United Kingdom in a country in which 85% per cent of inmates are Muslim and prisons are being used by criminals to indoctrinate and recruit individuals that when free would become involved in acts of terrorism.