The Guardian: Jewish Brexit Party Candidate and Swastika

The Guardian: Jewish Brexit Party Candidate and Swastika

How many times the UAF, Hope Not Hate, politicians and mass media have called those supporting Brexit Nazi, Fascist, Racist et cetera, et cetera?

But... and it is a big BUT, oh surprise, Jewish people are standing as candidates for the Brexit Party and therefore the UAF, Hope Not Hate, politicians and mass media are calling Jewish people Nazi, Facist, Racist et cetera et cetera.

Now, none other than The Guardian is publicly stating that those who are are campaigning for Brexit are not Nazi, are not Fascist, are not Racist and that all crap spread by UAF, Hope Not Hate, politicians and mass media against those who stand in favour of leaving the European Union is crap. 

The constant labelling of politicians because of their positions regarding the relationship with the European Union is precisely what led to a Jewish candidate being called Nazi. I say that not only those who painted the Swastika should be investigated. The UAF should be investigated. Hope Not Hate should be investigated. UNITE should be investigated. All those who call British politicians whose only crime is to stand for what they believe in a Democratic society should be investigated because every time somebody is called a Nazi is the equivalent of painting a Swastika on the face of the said individual.

Nick Griffin is the actual British National Party Leader

Nick Griffin is the actual British National Party Leader

When Adam Walker stood on a platform in London promising 'a New Leadership Style', he spoke about a brighter future with lots of visibility. Since then, the Karate Instructor has been practically invisible. Adam Walker is used to carry out interviews with members of the public without telling them who he is and he gets away with it because, unlike Nick Griffin, Adam Walker has no useful political profile apart for a dubious personal profile generated by a very public confrontation with students that made him become very shy and reluctant to appear in front of television cameras.

Nick Griffin was directly targeted because he used to get things done. Under his leadership a so called Far Right political party achieved what no so called Far Right organisation had achieved before or even dream about achieving. Two MEPs, a Member of the London Assembly, effective Opposition in a London local authority and a significant number of Councillors across the rest of the country. 

The spiteful National Front that never ever achieved anything of significance set out to destroy the British National Party. While the British National Party glorified national symbols and national flags, the National Front was either using flags with Swastikas or glorifying a foreign ideology while pretending to be British. National Front might gather around the Cenotaph but their ideals are far from being British ideals.

It is no coincidence that individuals like Richard Edmonds and Tony Martin went back to National Front. In actual fact, they never left and the National Front since its early days has been at war with itself, a war that was promoted by infiltrators like Sonia Gable who used to get information by mole-ing with practically every single National Front high ranking officer.

National Front Leaders don't last too long. But this doesn't really matter because it has never achieved anything of significance anyway. 

Did John Tyndall actually change when he left National Front to create the British National Party? Not really. And this is precisely why his replacement as Leader by Nick Griffin came as a shock to the system. People like John Tyndall wanted a bit of the same away from the backstabbing routine of the National Front. For John Tyndall, BNP was supposed to be NF Mark 2. His plans were brought to a halt by somebody who is much better educated than he was. The Cambridge Man wanted a completely new organisation without the crappy baggage of the National Front. 

People who were sick and tired of the treacherous practices of both Labour and Conservatives joined the new organisation. Labour voters and Conservative voters decided to support the British National Party and this made possible the landslide that produces two Members of the European Parliament. 

This was a red alert for the Establishment and the Mass Media that immediately decided to infiltrate and destroy the British National Party from within. Police Officers joined the British National Party and went around promoting dissent, engaging in racist talk and making salutes pretending to be genuine British National Party supporters. The campaign against Nick Griffin and the British National Party was planned, organised and implemented by the Political Establishment. To this effect, they used the mass media and para-political organisations like the UAF and Hope Not Gate. Labour Party politicians and mass media including the BBC produced a gigantic cover up regarding the indecent and criminal activities of Muslim gangs mainly of Pakistani descent for many years. In actual fact, Nick Griffin was the first one to denounce organised gang rape including drugs and alcohol and did so in dialogue with the BBC only to be called racist for denouncing criminal activities.

For more than 16 years, the Labour Party and Police knew about gang rape in epic proportions in places like Rotherham and other British cities and did absolutely nothing to protect vulnerable children many of who were being supposedly protected by Social Services that rather than protecting children were actively acting as suppliers of vulnerable children for the rapists.

The flag against crimes against children was later taken by Tommy Robinson - himself a former British National Party member -, Paul Golding - himself a former British National Party Member-, Jayda Fransen and Anne Marie Waters. With the exception of Anne Marie Waters, Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen have all had to serve prisons sentences as campaigners against abuses against children and campaigners against terrorism.

The next stage has been to ban campaigners like Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson from using social media to raise awareness of what is an ongoing problem in Britain. The likes of Gerard Batten and Kate Hopkins have joined the fight against abuses but entire areas of Britain have been taken over by individuals who can carry out attacks while little is being done to prevent such attacks or to punish the perpetrators.

Extremism is being promoted by the Establishment, the mass media and para-political organisations who try to silence those who denounce crime and this is done for political reasons. Certain Members of Parliament need the money and votes of the perpetrators of crimes to keep themselves in the House of Commons. When a Labour MP raised her head to denounce crimes, she was targeted and called racist.

Accusations of racism are the favourite tool of many political operators when they try to cover up abuses being committed. Recently, several Labour MPs left the Labour Party making speeches about anti-Semitism - including amongst them a Jewish MP. They should be reminded of the fact that a white Jewish Lady was told by Muslim leaders that she couldn't stand as local Candidate because she was too Jewish and too white. Any complaints about it? Isn't refusing to support a candidate because she was Jewish and white a flagrant expression of racism and anti-Semitism? What happened to Muslim leaders that engaged in racism and anti-Semitism? Absolutely nothing. Not even a slap on the wrists.

There should be one Justice for all regardless of race, religion or any other consideration. Justice should be Universal. But this doesn't happen in Britain, not even when you are dealing with Social Services that seem to be making decisions based on race, religion and nationality.

When there is so much talk about new political parties, there is the need of a political organisation that really and truly represent the views of a growing number of people who have become disenchanted with so called mainstream political parties. Without a Parliament that is truly representative of public opinion, we are going to go from crisis to crisis and as the gap between those occupying positions of power and the rest of the population grows, British Democracy will become increasingly unstable.

The rise of the Gilet Jaunes in France and elsewhere is no coincidence. Those who have no political representation take to the streets and conflict soon follows. Those wanting to protect a status quo that is not working use repression and bans up to the point when they lose control as a a consequence we see the rise of the number of corpses lying on the streets.

For a true Democratic System to exist and be effective, all views must be represented everywhere and this is includes governing bodies, the administration, education, mass media and social media.  

 

  

After 50 years, what has the UK National Front actually achieved?

National Front: Fifty years in politics? For what? A Parish Council Seat?

The best way of looking at any piece of political writing is to focus on the details and Richard Edmonds gives plenty of details to show that the National Front was, is and will be a spent force in British Politics.

He says and we quote:

The National Front was founded fifty years ago by far-seeing men and women who knew then that the clowns and traitors at Westminster were leading our nation to its ruin. Friends, if we remain true and brave and stick to our nationalist principles, we can yet win through.

Fifty years of what? The National Front never won any election apart from having a seat in a Parish Council. This is the political organisation that says that "we can win through". You only need to check the numbers registered by the Electoral Commission of every election in the United Kingdom where the National Front ever stood. He also talks about standing for nationalist principles but, as it is often the case, is short in terms of definitions that could get the organisation in very deep waters from a legal standpoint.

With all due respect, Richard Edmonds has been NF then BNP then NF et cetera on an ongoing basis, having turned against the BNP in the throws of a Mayoral Campaign. Not much regard for fellow activists that with enormous sacrifices put their lives on the firing line.

For many years, Richards Edmonds and others had a grudge against the now former Leader of the British National Party Nick Griffin who deposed the previous leader John Tyndall. Now, let's look at the facts.  

Nick Griffin

John Tyndall

 

You can draw your own conclusions about the kind of "British Nationalism" the National Front stands for and can certainly draw your own conclusions about why certain individuals did their worst to undermine Nick Griffin's leadership from the very beginning in spite of the fact that Nick Griffin brought about electoral successes that those guided by John Tyndall could only dream about. Why? Look at the images. I reckon the images are graphic enough to explain why.

Here is another quote: 

Meantime Nigel Farage’s multi-racial, civic-nationalist UKIP is now minus Farage and in the hands of Tommy -“I love Israel” – Robinson. True patriots have not forgotten that Israel was spawned in the blood of British soldiers murdered by Jewish terrorists in Palestine at the end of the Second World war. 

Richard Edmonds remains a faithful of racial discrimination attacking Nigel Farage of "the "multi-racial and civic-nationalist UKIP". He goes on talking about Jewish terrorists in Palestine fighting for the creation of the State of Israel.

The State of Israel was not spawned on the blood of Jewish terrorists. Let's look at the facts. During World War I, there was the Balfour Declaration - a public statement made by the British government in 1917 (long before World War Two) announcing support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. This happened when Palestine was still a region of the Ottoman Empire. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Palestine became the British Mandate for Palestine on 29 September 1923 and lasted until 15 May 1948, year in which the State of Israel was officially established. 

Judging by events and concepts, Richard Edmonds would perhaps refer to the Colonials of 1776 that led to the creation of the United States of America as "American Terrorists". Personally, I wouldn't tell an American Citizen today that according to Richard Edmonds criteria George Washington would be a Terrorist. Many years afterwards, the country they created came to the rescue of the United Kingdom in its hour of need. 

A bit of historical enlightenment would also show that the  French of Napoleon Bonaparte that Admiral Horatio Nelson defeated at Trafalgar and the Duke of Wellington defeated at Waterloo were not the French of Charles de Gaulle.

It seems that facts matter very little when the aim is to make a point to justify deeply rooted beliefs, beliefs that led to the rise of National Action - an organisation proscribed for its openly anti-Semitic stances. Empty slogans and massive over-generalisation lead to discrimination and violence.

If after 50 years of militancy this is the kind of politics that can be produced, electoral success will remain forever elusive.

We don't launch personal attacks. We look at what has been said and/or written. The quotes and factual historical information are in the public domain.

The Electoral Records of National Front are in the public domain and have been published by the Electoral Commission. We reproduce the New Year Message that we have quoted. Graphic images are also in the public domain. 

"A New Years Message From Richard Edmonds and the National Front

Friends, members and supporters, it gives us great satisfaction to announce that we are witnessing the collapse of the hateful, anti-British Establishment. Before our very eyes, all the political enemies, the failures, the duds, the traitors, all those with malice and hatred in their hearts, they are all coming to a sticky and final end: just as we knew that they would.

The British National party is now finished, dead, destroyed by unprincipled money-grabbers and charlatans.  Meantime Nigel Farage’s multi-racial, civic-nationalist UKIP is now minus Farage and in the hands of Tommy -“I love Israel” – Robinson. True patriots have not forgotten that Israel was spawned in the blood of British soldiers murdered by Jewish terrorists in Palestine at the end of the Second World war. Meantime we all witness at Westminster the “Honourable members” lining up to stick the knife into prime minister, Theresa -“Running scared” – May. (Today’s press headline as this article is being written). The question is, whether Theresa May will still be prime minster on New Year’s day ? Friends, with the collapse of her government we are witnessing political Justice. For decades the Tories have lied to the British people at every election and on every occasion, and now the BREXIT vote has found them out. Will May or which ever Tory con-man replaces her organise the Exit from the hated European Union which we voted for ? Don’t hold your breath: you know that the Tories ALWAYS lie, and they are not going to be different this time. A leopard does not change its spots, and the fact is that Tories’ first and only loyalty is to the finance houses of City of London and to no-one else. Probably before much longer this country will be groaning under the Marxist rule of prime minister Corbyn and his chums; and this Left-wing nightmare will be what May and her government by their betrayal of the BREXIT vote will have bequeathed the nation. And the nation will not forget and not forgive. So, brace yourselves for what is coming.

The National Front was founded fifty years ago by far-seeing men and women who knew then that the clowns and traitors at Westminster were leading our nation to its ruin. Friends, if we remain true and brave and stick to our nationalist principles, we can yet win through.

Long live the National Front."

Jack Renshaw: Justice system gone mad

Jack Renshaw: Justice system gone mad

Jack Renshaw used to be a member of the youth branch of the British National Party and made speeches at the age of 15 at party meeting including a National Conference.

Now, he is in detention in Manchester because some time ago during a speech made at the age of 22, years after he left the BNP youth movement, he allegedly made derogatory comments about Jews.

Jack Renshaw was arrested by the North West Counter Terrorism Unit headed by Detective Chief Superintendent Tony Mole.

Jack Renshaw a target of the North West Counter Terrorism Unit? Jack Renshaw seen as terror threat? It is obviously a joke and a joke that is costing thousands of Pounds of taxpayers money. I wrote to the head of the North West Counter Terrorism Unit and also to the Jewish Group because this is utter nonsense that show how inadequate the services that are supposed to protect from terrorism actually are. If they had done real a real background search on Jack Renshaw they would have discovered who Jack Renshaw actually. If we went to send to Court every single person who has something native to say about Jews, half of the country would have to be sent to Court and ultimately jailed.

Mass hysteria is spreading like wildfire. Look at the headlines regarding the Labour Party, for example. Reading such rising amount of rubbish one would be led to believe that suddenly all Labour Party supporters would suddenly become storm troopers of Das Dritte Reich. Some people like Jews and other people don't like Jews. Get on with it. When a crook like Bernard Madoff goes around ripping off both Jews and non Jews and ends up in jail or a movie mogul like Harvey Weinstein stand accused of molestation, harassment and rape, both Jews and non Jews are angry.

Criticism is not a crime. It is a democratic right to criticise what we do not like without being taken to court for exercising our democratic rights. The legal system is crossing red lines and compromising our democratic freedoms.

North West Counter Terrorism Unit - Manchester

Dear Anthony George Mole,

I met Jack Renshaw, the 22 year-old that stands accused of making derogatory comments about Jews. The fact that he is being portrayed as a dangerous individual beggars belief and shows very little understanding about who Jack Renshaw actually is.

When I met him he would be about 15 years of age posing as a British Patriot and making emotive speeches about Britain, with very little life experience and very little or no political experience whatsoever. He was the typical young boy seeking attention and trying to be the centre of attention for the sake of self-importance.

There are many thousands like him that are much more of a danger to themselves than they could possibly be a danger to anybody else. You should also be aware of the mentality of the people you are dealing with. By sending an immature individual to jail, you are going to be making a very serious mistake. You are going to turn him into a hero.

Jewish publications are talking about him. The UAF is talking about him. Suddenly, from being totally anonymous, you are going to turn him into a celebrity, into somebody who was persecuted “for the cause”. This is the worst way of dealing with individuals like Jack Renshaw. You will be promoting his narrative and the narrative of thousands like him. From University drop-out, to “fighter for the cause”. As I refer to the Jewish Group, he is going to be surrounded by people who are the real danger and that will most probably nurture him as British prisons become centres for political indoctrination and terrorism training hotspots.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen

The World of Politics / Politische Welt/ Мир политики

From: K G Hohenstauffen [mailto:kghohenstauffen@btconnect.com]
Sent: 06 November 2017 23:38
To: 'editorial@thejngroup.com' <editorial@thejngroup.com>; 'newsdesk@thejngroup.com' <newsdesk@thejngroup.com>
Subject: Jack Renshaw
Importance: High

Dear Sir/Madam,

Who is Jack Renshaw? An immature 22-year-old looking for attention and saying silly things that ultimately got him into trouble. I met him about 5 years ago. By then he was presented as an enthusiastic and old-fired up British Nationalist with no political experience whatsoever. He read high-school style speeches full of patriotic fervour but with very little substance and waited for the applause of the audience, not understanding that many of those who made up the audience were people of little consequence, limited education and limited brainpower. He went on to join National Action – a group of very disturbed and disturbing individuals, also of little consequence, of limited education and limited brainpower who he defined as a more radical group because he wanted to be ‘a man of action’. Being a man of action meant for him to talk rubbish, the kind of rubbish he couldn’t possibly talk about as a member of a political party – any political party. Jack Renshaw is not a dangerous individual. If anything, he is merely a danger to himself.

He is already in detention and there is the probability that on January 2^nd, 2018 he will be sent to jail for a very long time. What would be achieved? There are many Jack Renshaw, teenagers that at one point or another lose their bearings and go around seeking attention, getting involved with the wrong kind of people. Because he will be judged for having made Anti-Jewish comments and he is going to be surrounded by Muslim Extremists who are also Anti-Jewish, he is going to spend time with people who are truly dangerous and have the means to commit atrocities. He is going to be trained, nurtured to become a real extremist, because British Prisons are training centres for Islamic Fundamentalists.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen

The World of Politics / Politische Welt/ Мир политики

http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/man-accused-jack-renshaw-stirring-up-jew-hate-pleads-not-guilty/