Labour: Rachel Reeves in tears as the marriage might not last long

 

It is usually said that an image speaks a thousand words. The image of the Chancellor of the Exchequer in tears tells the story of a marriage that might not last long.

If Rachel Reeves goes, the honeymoon is over. The marriage is under enormous stress barely one year after the May 2024 General Election. The knives are being sharpened. Despite the fact that Angela Rayner stated on television that "she has no intention to replace Keir Starmer", a rebellion of not less than 128 MPs is no mean business. Moreover, many of those now standing as Independent used to be Labour Party MPs.

Things are more serious than they actually look. Several Muslim MPs now standing as Independents used to be Labour Party MPs. This means than sooner than later we are going to see a new political party defined along religious and ethnic lines. Ethnic voters are turning against the Labour Party. Blacks and Asians no longer see the Labour Party as their natural home. Actions taken by the official Labour Party in matters concerning geopolitics are not very popular. Ethnic voters have no reason to swear allegiance to a white Metropolitan Labour Party that leans in favour of Israel, despite what amounts to genocide and mass murder.

Going against the vulnerable and supporting violations of basic human rights, the present Labour government is digging its own grave.

The War of Words is what comes before the Physical War

People must understand that the War of Words is what comes before the Physical War, when bombs fly and people die. Any war is a financial affair. In fact, there is always a financial reason for wars to happen. 

At this point in time there are economic rivals fighting to prevail and this is accelerating to the point when there will be a point of no return. We know how wars begin, but we cannot foresee how wars will end. This sort of wars have happened in the past. The Mighty Roman Empire saw the sacking of Rome by invaders. So the success of the so called West is by no means guaranteed.

Going into the not so remote past, we must remember the history of Europe. There was a time when the Moors (Arabic Invaders) and the Turks took over entire regions of Europe by force and kept them under their rule for hundreds of years. The naive belief that demographic changes will occur without consequences is dangerous. Peaceful colonisation will suddenly turn into a more violent expression of colonisation as foreign populations grow in numbers inside the so called West.

Does the ceremonial have anything to do with Christianity?

 

Does the ceremonial, ritual and clothing have anything to do with Christianity?

For centuries, so called Christian churches and so called Christian organizations have been characterized by all kinds of peculiar attires that have nothing to do with Christianity.

Who invented 'Nuns'? Who said that certain attires had anything to do with the teachings of Jesus? Did Jesus talk about building temples full of statues and decorations or talk about the proclamation of so called saints? No, he did not. Jesus was not immortal. He was made immortal by Emperor Constantine. So all that has been spread for centuries by organised churches has been an an absolute lie. Jesus was prophet, a mortal man that had wife and children. Where did the abstentinence vows come from? Another invention that has served to hide homosexuality and depravity. It is no surprise to learn about sexual abuses within churches.

How does he look like? Like a clown. And there are many of them. Recent scandals are not even the tip of the iceberg.

I recently spoke with two ladies working for the Church of England and ask them why they don't go around spreading the Word of Jesus. They told me that they don't do that because 'we are not Evangelists'. Well, truet Christianity is evangelical. By saying that they are not Evangelical they go against Jesus.

As more and more temples get sold to developers or are taking over by other religious organisations, the fate of the Church of England and other churches is all too obvious.

Muslims are everywhere preaching Islam, in the same way that true Christians went around and go around preaching the word of Jesus. I recently met a group of Muslims in the centre of town. They asked me what languages did I speak and they offered me a copy of the Quran in different languages, including several European languages.

What is the Church of England doing to promote Christianity? Absolutely nothing. Or even worse, with every single scandal, they are proving that the Church of England is a source of corruption of all kinds.

  

What would happen if an Islamic political party was created?

 

What would happen to British politics if an Islamic political party was created? 

Looking at demographics, it is easy to imagine that if Muslim communities stopped supporting existing political parties and decided to create an Islamic Party such political party would be very successful. Muslim families tend to have more children and therefore, every year, the number of those supporting the said party electorally would be increasing. Nowadays, a sizeable number of those coming to Britain as refugees come from Muslim countries and with European countries increasingle averse to accept Muslim refugees the numbers of those coming to UK would also be growing up.

If Jeremy Corbyn wanted to increase his political influence, he is making all the right moves. Those he is now joining as a group happen to be mostly former Labour candidates and former Labour members now acting as Independents that happen to be Muslim. As the Conservative Party did before, Labour is alienating Muslim voters. More conservative Muslim voters not only oppose the mainstream political parties' policies and attitudes regarding Israel. They also oppose sexual ideology that openly contradicts traditional Muslim values.

Tommy Robinson`: a picture that speaks a thousand words

 

This is Tommy Robinson, proudly and happily standing on top of an Israeli Defense Force tank near the Syrian border.

His anti-Muslim rhetoric is clearly linked to Irsael so when questions are asked about who is funding Tommy Robinson, the answers should be very straightforward.

Whatever happens in United Kingdom is directly linked to conflicts in Middle East and Asia Minor.

Some operators play the two sides. On the one hand they criticize Tommy Robinson in public while pledging support for Muslim communities, while in private they fully support what he is doing in the United Kingdom and also support what is being done in the Arab World, including the genocide taking place in the occupied territories and now spreading to neighbouring countries.

When people talk: Muslims and Nick Griffin in dialogue

https://rumble.com/v3ygoxa-nick-griffin-jews-zionism-the-far-right-and-islam-in-europe-bb-113.html

As Winston Churchill said it: Jaw Jaw is better than War War.

IRA: imagine what could have happened if some crackpot had decided to bomb Ireland?

 

Before partition, there was violence in Ireland and after the 1920 treaty that was supposed to have dealt with the issue of civil war, the IRA Irish Republican Army went on carrying attacks of the British mainland for countless years until a new treaty known as the Good Friday Agreement was signed to deal with grievances.

IRA members could be found anywhere, including any of the remaining parts of the United Kingdom, but this did not lead the British to use a cannon to kill a fly. One wonders what could have happened if Israelis had dealt with many of the early grievances surgically instead of resorting to full military deployments. 

Understandbly, the British did not resort to mass bombinappg raids or mass military operations. The British were much more clever than the Israelis and the issues were sorted out. Israel has been using constant military might without realising that every time they resorted to the use of military might they were seeding the sources of the next attack and this is exactly what Israel is doing right now. Israel is planting the seeds of more and worse violence in the near future. Because the USA - unlike Britain - has been more about brute force than about diplomacy, the USA has constantly exacerbated tensions in every conflict the USA has been involved. Making people hide does not solve any problems. The concept of deterrance is based on the presuption that if people are afraid enough they will no longer use similar methods. Such way of thinking is absolutely misguided. Pent up anger and frustration will lead the region in exactly the opposite direction and away from peace.After decades, the concept of deterrance has proven to be exactly the opposite of what should have been implemented. Because it trusts only might, Israel has spent more than 70 years in a permanent state of emergency and as soon as it lowered its guard what happened was bound to happen.

Deterrence is not the way forward. Deterrence will only make things worse for both Palestinians and Jews. Fear will not be conducive to peace.

Countries that support military operations in Palestine themselves fail to understand that policies of oppression and destruction can only lead to more insecurity and more violence. The same policies of oppression and destruction were applied over and over again in the past and we are still here facing the same dangers.

The Lion's logic and the nature of war

 

The Lion's Logic and the nature of war

Adolf Hitler said that once war starts there are no civilians. This goes together with the Lion's Logic. 

Lion's have to fight with other Lions to assert their power and when they prevail the most probable outcome is that the cubs of the defeated Lion are killed.

My father explained the Lion's Logic to me in very simple terms. If you allow the children of your enemies to survive, they will be a constant danger to your own existence.

The reason the Jews, men, women and children, were sent to the camps for extermination is that Germany was following the Lion's Logic. You don't allow children to live to become a threat to your own existence. The fact that Zionism and Israel do exist proves that Adolf Hitler was right in this regard. If you allow any survivors then your own survival will be in doubt.

The logic of the Palestinian conflict between Palestinian and Jews is living proof that since the Lion's Logic is not being applied. As long as Palestinian children are left alive and as lond as Jewish children are left alive the conflict will go on and on and on. Extermination is the only sure solution.

In war there are no civilians. There are only friends and foes. All sides proved that there are no civilians. The thought when bombing British cities and when bombing German cities was pretty evident. There were no civilians. There were Britons and Germans and the idea was to kill as many as possible to prevail. The defeated don't make good material. The sick and the infirm don't make good material. The disabled don't make good material. The sexually dysfunctional - including those mentally sexually dysfunctional - must be exterminated to build a stronger nation. Violence exists for a very good reason.

Refugees are inferior people. People who refuse to stand up and fight.

https://www.facebook.com/nationalistforum

Palestine: Labour goes to war

Multiculturalism? Diversity? Well, the Labour Party and usual supporter of mass migration now realises that it has been promoting war and violence in Britain. Reading comments written by Jews in the UK it is plainly visible that Jews talk about being targetted, about not walking outside their Jewish areas.

In fact, Britain has imported conflicts and now the said conflicts are going to be played out in Britain. Angela Merkel said it out loud: Multikulti ist tot. (Multiculturalism is dead.) Not that too many people managed to understand that the person saying it was none other than the one who had been promoting open borders for the European Union and taking countries to European courts for rejecting open borders.

Frauke Petry went as far as calling for migrants to be shot dead if they tried to enter Germany. Then somebody noticed what Frauke Petry said, but continued to ignore what Angela Merkel had said.

Britain has not built integration. Britain has built ghettos and whenever there is a geopolitcal crisis, those ghettos become alive. Suella Braverman does not have the common sense necessary to understand that she should not side with any of the parties in the conflict. A proposal to ban the Palestinian flag was a declaration of war against Muslim communities in Britain because in this conflict there are religious and ethnic factors that many are failing to understand.

As an outsider, I see the makings of Holocaust Round Two. As long as the USA continues to support a bankrupt Israeli government and its policies of occupation and oppression, Jews will never be safe. 

Now, we have got the Labour Party at war. Mayor of London: Muslim. Scottish First Minister: Muslim. Labout MPs left and right: Muslim. Labour Councillors already resigning. Firstly, Covid, Secondly, the European crisis and energy prices. Thirdly, Palestine. A never ending series of scandals and crisis.

If things get out of control, the years of the IRA will seem like Paradise.

Palestine:has immigration turned host countries into parts of the battlefield?

Decades ago, Palestine seemed to be a long way away from Europe, but today Europe has become very much part of Palestine. The boundaries have become blurred with local politicians talking about what is happening as if Europe itself at the centre of what is happening in the Middle East, with people reacting for or against the parties involved in a conflict that has been lasting practically since the British decided to promote partition and the creation of a state practically entirely made up of Eastern Europeans surrounded by Arab nations.

Present inhabitants of Israel are much more closely related to the peoples of the countries where they lived for centuries than to the original inhabitants of those we came to know as Jews. The creation of the State of Israel is in fact part of yet another European Crusade and this has been very much part of the problem since the very beginning. Zionism is much more associated with ideology than it is associated with religion. Even today, despite many decades, there are clear differences between different brands of Judaism, but some are more powerful than others. The creation of a racial theocratic state was a disastrous mistake. The arrival of massive numbers of white Europeans elicited an immediate reaction.

   

Netherlands: Rutte raus

 

Why don't they like Mark Rutte? Ask Dutch farmers. Ask those who need energy? Ask those who are fed up of having their country flooded?

Mark Rutte headed a coalition that wanted to get rid of Dutch farmers 'to save the environment'. Absolutely cuckoo. Things got to the point when a Dutch Farmer Movement went into politics to defeat nonsense. He wants to get rid of Dutch farmers to then be forced to import food from abroad that presumably is produced payment an environmental price because it is produced abroad and then has to be brought into Netherlands generating fumes. Not much sense, but no sense to be expected from an individual that believes that sacrificing Netherlands in vain is a price worth paying for doing absolutely nothing to save the environment. 

But the last straw was not the environment itself or farming but Netherlands policies on migration. The impact of migration is felt across Netherlands as it is felt elsewhere across Europe. Given the size of Netherlands, one can imagine that it would not take too long to erase it and transform it into fertile ground for Islamic extremists. Well, it already is fertile ground for Islamic extremists although Mark Rutte lives in denial, but denial did not save the ruling coalition when reality became overwhelming. Netherlands needs a government that cares about Dutch needs and Dutch priorities. Even when it comes to geopolitics, Mark Rutte lives in cuckooland. 

Alison Chabloz: How monies are being spent in court cases that serve no purpose whatsoever

 Alison Chabloz: How monies are being spent in court cases that serve no purpose whatsoever

For several years now, the English legal system has been used as a money making machine for private individuals and as money spending machine for British taxpayers in meaningless court cases that are not going to make things better.

If anything the legal circus is creating more problems and giving ammunition to groups that have as a given agenda the extermination of Jews across Europe including in Britain.

Jews and those who continue this legal circus more than 70 years after the presumed end of World War Two have made Adolf Hitler and his ideas immortal. Just a few days ago in Norway, Anders Breivik during an appeal sessson made a National Socialist salute and people across the world enjoyed the scene.

Some say that we are three weeks away from the start of yet another World War. Nobody rational would believe that should the conflict start in Ukraine it will stop in Ukraine. We know that given the policy of alliances, the conflict in all probability will spread like wildfire across the entire continent and this without taking into account that it could also trigger war in China as China would use this as a golden opportunity to implement its own agenda in Asia.

There are more than enough Far Right groups and Muslim groups in Europe to use the fog of war to go hunting Jews across Europe when countries are engulfed in a World War. What have been the mortal crimes committed by Alison Chabloz? She has written songs and expressed her views on radio programmes. If everybody who does not believe in the Jewish mantra of the Holocaust were to be imprisoned, more than half of the world's population would be in jail and history and especially after the presumed end of World War Two has not been favourable to Jews given the record of Israel and of certain very prominent individuals who have been constantly on the news.

The more people mention the persecution of Jews, the stronger the anti-Jewish movements become. The Jewish rhetoric feeds the anti-Jewish rhetoric in the same manner that the Muslim rhetoric feeds the anti-Muslim rhetoric and this is happening on a daily basis. The rhetorics about Jews and Muslism is mixed with vested interests and geopolitical interests and this is a deadly mix and wars are not the way to maintain social, economic and political stability.

Die Judenfrage is already being talked about and certain groups are rubbing their hands with glee. Chasing artists for writing songs and taking part in radio programmes will not save the idiots who are behind such harassment and persecution schemes. 

Another Holocaust is coming

Far Right groups and Muslim Extremists are rubbing their hands with glee. In the fog of war Jews in Europe will be exterminated. This is catastrope and is almost upon is. War in Europe will create fertile ground for it to happen.

British military history is not free from tragic examples of delusion leading to catastrophic events. The Narvik campaign is just one of them when forces went to Narvik without air cover, without artillery, without naval cover and without the necessary winter equipment only to be slaughtered by the Wehrmacht from sea, air and land, event that led to the fall of the government of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.

Another example of delusion was the sending of two naval units to Asia, once again without air cover, to be sunk by Japanese torpedo aircraft or the bad arrangements in Singapore that led to the fall of Singapore with the arrival of British and Commonwealth troops that only arrived in time to surrender to Japanese troops.

Another example of delusion was the badly planned campaign in the Netherlands by Marshall Montgomery known as Market Garden that was bound to be a disaster with the delivery of Polish paratroopers on the third day that were killed before they set foot in the Netherlands and supplies that were thrown straight into the hands of the Wehrmacht due to lack of proper communications.

Never mind the failed Suez Campaign launched by Anthony Eden or Churchill Gallipoli Campaign.

More recent disasters were the campaign in Afghanistan and in Iraq launched by Tony Blair under false pretences with fabricated evidence about WMDs that never existed and created massive waves of refugees, destabilizing even more regions like Asia Minor and Middle East that were already unstable leading to the rise of Islamic State and events that are well known.

But now we are dealing with an even more worrying situation when Britain is about to engage in a military conflict that could engulf the whole of Europe under a government that has systematically reduced the strength both in terms of material resources and of numbers of the British Armed Forces. How on Earth are we talking about cutting down the numbers of the British Armed Forces a time when everybody is talking about impending doom?

Simon Jenkins writing on The Guardian spoke about how unwise it would be to commit Britain to a military effort in Ukraine and a lady writer writing on The Independent asked the question about American attempts to drive the Russian Federation to a war that the Russian Federation does not want.

How many times is Britain going to make the same kind of disastrous mistakes that lead to tragedy? How many times politicians that should be in a privileged position to prevent a catastrophe act as if they were completely unaware of the consequences? Reports about British cooperation with Ukraine are laughable. Do you really believe that a few anti-tank weapons will prevent an assault by a country that drove the Wehrmacht across Europe all the way back to Berlin? Do you know the history of the Soviet Union of which the Russian Federation was the real driver? Do you think that wars can be won without committing troops on the battlefield?

People in Britain should be told what will really happen if a military conflict in Europe begins because their children are going to be sent to the battlefield to die as children died before in many wars like the First World War and the Second World War. As Sergei Ivanov stated, if there is a conflict you can forget about the Nuclear Deterrent and about ‘weapons of pinpoint accuracy’. This will be a military conflict that will engulf Europe and it will be a protracted war that will make the Afghanistan campaign and the Iraqi campaign look like child’s play.

As always, we hear about the green agenda and the rising costs of energy that can certainly cripple many European economies including the British economy. What do you think the effects of a widespread conflict in Europe will be when it comes to energy supplies and the link with inflationary forces? What do you think the social and political consequences will be if economies become critically unstable to the point when there are very unwanted developments?

When Germany was falling 70 or so years ago, Adolf Hitler prophesized the rise of a new Germany when the two colossus of the time – America and the Soviet Union – were to face each other on the battlefield. Do you know that there are groups in Europe that are rubbing their hands with glee thinking about what they will do if there is war in Europe? For decades now, Europe has been dealing with the scourge of Islamic Extremists. Can you imagine a Europe in which both Islamic Extremists and Far Right elements will have a free hand to do whatever they please because governments will be involved in fighting a European war?

It is not just about being sensible and realistic. It is about not guaranteeing what cannot be guaranteed. It is about avoiding pompous and affected statements that are a far cry away from reality. It is about mass media control not to create an environment leading to war, environment that could lead to reprisals in the United Kingdom. In the event of war, it will take very little for people to start hunting people in the United Kingdom. I have heard people in the UK say that war in Europe is being promoted by Jews in the United Kingdom. I listen to people, and I am concerned about the consequences. I have a dialogue with a Jewish friend in Nevada, USA and we speak about situations happening in Europe right now that are being treated as black and white, as cowboys and Indians, with political postures that could lead to a massive tragedy.

If attitudes in some circles in the West don’t change for the better, we could be faced with very foreseeable consequences.

There is no God or Gods: all religions are lies

There is no God or Gods: all religions are lies used for power and control. Throughout history religions have been used for spurious purposes to make Man kill Man and exploit Man. Religions have been used to justify murder by putting Man against Man.

Churches, Mosques, Synagogues and other religious temples are symbols of the stupidity of Man that afraid of the final destination has fantasized about Eternity. We see it everywhere. What were the Pyramids about then? The Pharoes had the Pyramids built as the passage to an imaginary After Life where they were going to continue enjoying the pleasures of the present life. They couldn't accept the fact that the bodies of Christians, Jews, Muslims or individuals following any other religion are going to rot, being putrified and decompose. Dust to the Dust. Das Ende. This is it. There is no Heaven. There is no Hell. 

All the temples, palaces, all the monuments are going to collapse when the time comes. Planet Earth has been evolving for millions of years and will continue evolving until a cataclysmic effect will put an end to it and erase it from the Universe. You know full well that at the beginning there was one single continent that was fragmented to form the continents that we know today. All countries that exist today will not be around when the time comes as the Earth surgace continues to change and evolve. All the nonsense about Eternity is just that: Nonsense.

One of the most murderous organisations has been the Catholic Church that not only justified invasions, colonisation and murder, but also carried out murder operations of its own throughout centuries. Why? Because the Catholic Church has nothing to do with Jesus. It is a tool used for power and control. It has deliberately supported oppresion because it served its own purposes.

David Amess: Victim of the lack of true integration

 

David Amess

The life of yet another Member of Parliament comes to an abrupt end. Britain as a country is under attack because Britain has dared to be open and welcoming to people who do not share Britain’s values because they were brought up in a very different environment and very different culture. We can talk about integration until we become red in the face, but the reality is that some might live in Britain for many years, some might be born in Britain and grow up in Britain enjoying what Britain has to offer and still reject Britain and see Britain as a foreign land. Many might not even speak the language of the country even where they were born in the United Kingdom.

David Amess, a family man who was Member of Parliament for several decades and earnt the respect and admiration of his peers and of those he represented, lost his life because of the gap that exists between the aspirations regarding integration and the realities of the lack of integration. It is about understanding that integration is not possible while there are ghetto realities. The attacker did not act alone. This was a premeditated attack. Ali Harbi Ali grew up in Croydon, Southeast London. Ghetto realities are exactly the opposite of integration.

Diversity when diversity does not include a common British identity is not acceptable. We must respect peoples’ diverse cultures, but we must all share values that unite us regardless of backgrounds and this should be a fundamental point starting with education so that children – regardless of backgrounds – grow up together and learn together as one. 

Talking about respecting differences, allowing ghetto realities with people living in Britain that often not even use English as their main language, without fostering a true national British identity, is one of the main reasons why David Amess was murdered while he was doing his job, the job he was elected to do. 

Tommy Robinson: Manipulation is the art of having somebody do what you want without getting publicly involved

Message sent to a Zionist organisation in London and referred to Members of Parliament including members of the British government, the Opposition, the Muslim Council of Britain and mass media including Lizzie Dearden, writer for The Independent thas has been involved in reporting about Tommy Robinson, and also sent to the Metropolitan Police in London that been repeatedly involved in actions involving public rallies and demonstrations and the courts. 

"Dear Sir/Madam,

Tommy Robinson standing on an IDF tank is Israel and then they tell you that he is not one of them. Ah, look! He is holding a gun. How many non-Jews would be allowed to hold a war gun standing on an IDF tank in Israel? What you tell us in London goes against factual information. At every rally, there have been Zionists supporting Tommy Robinson and his anti-Muslim messages.  During his courts trials, Zionists have been very visible supporting Tommy Robinson and Israeli flags have accompanied every single rally in support of Tommy Robinson. Those organising and supporting Tommy Robinson’s rallies at the highest level are Jewish: Israeli Jews and non-Israeli Jews.

Perhaps you could come up with a coherent, consistent and plausible explanation. I copy this message to the Muslim Council of Britain. I reckon they also deserve an explanation.

Perhaps you can also offer an explanation to the Metropolitan Police and to other Police forces in the UK that have spent a huge amount of resources policing rallies that you supported while promoting animosity against Muslims in the United Kingdom.

You throw a rock, you hide your hands behind your back and claim to be innocent.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen"

Undoubtedly, members of the public have been taken for a ride for a very long time and offered images that don't fit in with the narrative of certain organisations that use public perception for their own ends, ends that have little to do with their declared aims.

It is no coincidence that at a time when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that fully supports the Israeli Far Right is involved in pushing forward the agenda of a Greater Israel using ethnic cleansing to throw out Palestinians from the occupied territories, Zionist organisations are publicly attempting to distance themselves from individuals that have been useful to their cause. 

This happens also a time when more and more Jews are turning against Benjamin Netanyahu that has been visibly unable to win an outright majority in Israel and remain in power as a caretaker Prime Minister.

There is also the fact that as Prime Minister he has protection against the charges made against him by the Israeli Judiciary for serious cases of fraud in which his own wife is also signalled as being involved. Therefore the importance of fuelling the ongoing conflict producing killings and destruction is twofold: conflict and murder keep Benjamin Netanyahu in power and by the same token allows him to carry on with his agenda of ethnic cleansing.

Rachel Shabi, Jewish writer writing on The Independent, London, England, United Kingdom:  

As we count the toll and name the dead, the bloody, grinding narrative of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has switched from “simmering tensions” to “escalating violence”. Everyday violence is now part of Jerusalem life. You sense it when Palestinian residents of this holy city, treated with animosity and suspicion, are deafened by the maddening hum of Israeli surveillance helicopters, when they face routine stop-and-searches and arrests by border police and often violent harassment from Jewish settlers. It’s there in the increasing presence of those settlers, not just in the expanding group of settlements that ring Jerusalem, but also in Palestinian neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem and the Old City. It’s there in the hate mobs and the chants of “death to Arabs” that spill on to the city’s streets.

In the absence of a political framework, it’s inevitable that these “simmering tensions” will spasmodically escalate. For where else can the anger and unresolved disputes go if there are no political channels through which to mediate?

Political vacuums are opportunistically filled by extremists. In Jerusalem, hardline Jewish national-religious settler groups have taken their fight from the West Bank to the city’s holy sites. Temple Mount, or Haram al-Sharif – the beautiful walled compound in the Old City that is sacred to Jews and Muslims – has long functioned according to status quo agreements. Under these, Jews can visit but not pray at the sacred site, while the Western Wall, just underneath, is reserved for Jewish prayer. But in recent years, movements calling for Jewish prayer rights have repeatedly flouted the codes, causing tensions and disturbances at the compound.

To be clear, this is not a religious coexistence campaign; Jewish religious leaders have for centuries ruled against Jewish prayer at Temple Mount. Indeed, the aims of the settler-led movement for additional worshipping rights become more transparent when you hear how they want to destroy the Dome of the Rock and replace it with a third Jewish Temple.

This would be bad enough in itself, but such extremist national-religious groups, once fringe and marginal, are now powerful and mainstream, partly because they are supported and funded by the current, settler-endorsing Israeli coalition.

Rachel Shabi perfectly describes what is going on. Power in Israel has been taken over by Jewish Far Right Extremists, Far Right Extremists supported by Zionist branches across the world, the kind of people that support Tommy Robinson because what Tommy Robinson is doing in the United Kingdom is no different from what Zionists are doing in Israel and in the occupied territories. It is plainly obvious that they want to publicly distance themselves from Tommy Robinson for the sake of keeping appearances since Tommy Robinson has been defined as British Far Right and has a political past as former member of the British National Party and founder of other parapolitical movements. 

Organisations like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters also have a pro-Zionist narrative and include  as members former members of the British National Party and this goes to show that when they are useful to promote messages supporting aggression in the occupied territories they are conveniently used. When they don't need to use them they call the said individuals Nazi, Fascist, Terrorist and the like.  

Israel: Those who live by the sword die by the sword

 

The idea of a Promised Land turned into a nightmare

Even before 1948, the year when what we know as the State of Israel came to be, Palestine was in flames. Palestine was the possession of many empires including the Roman Empire and the Ottoman Empire. The Crusaders went to Palestine presumably to liberate it from the ones they called the Infidels - translation of those who professed another faith that wasn't their faith. Murder, rape, and destruction have for a very long time been common currency in Palestine and given what we know such lamentable state of affairs is not going to come to an end any time soon. Tonight, once again, violence has spread across Palestine. Peace in Palestine is never an ever lasting reality and, as always, those who live by the sword die by the sword. For centuries, Islam, Christianity and Judaism lived together without any formal state. Oh, yes, they were not always at war. The coexisted. Under British rule Palestine was a Protectorate and there was rule of law, but a precarious peace was not meant to last as events in Europe triggered a process that to put an end to the Protectorate and led to the partition of Palestine. 

Until the start of World War Two - officially started on September 3, 1939 - two days after Germany invaded Poland - National Socialist Germany was initially in favour of the idea of sending Jewish populations to Palestine and the so called Zionist Movement was very much in favour of it as they wanted Jews to go to what they called the Promised Land. But the start of World War Two frustrated many plans. 

By the end of World War Two, once again, the Zionist Movement renewed its efforts and finally in 1948 the partition of Palestine took place and the State of Israel was born, but not all Jews chose to go to Palestine. Many of those who were leaving Europe chose to go to other countries i.e. the USA. After what they had been through before the war and after the war, quite a few were not willing to face any more so much hardship. The State of Israel of 1948 was nothing compared to today's Israel as conflict after conflict the State of Israel took more and more land from its neighbours and expansion has never really stopped. Such expansion at the expense of local populations could only lead to confrontation and this is exactly what we are witnessing today.  Instead of an ever lasting peace, it has created an ever lasting war that has been affecting other parts of the world for a very long time.

Why Anti-Semitism activists are working together with the British Far Right?

 

Paul Besser and outspoken anti-Semitism activists 

Anti-Semitism campaigners in the United Kingdom appear to be working together with elements of the British Far Right and they appear to have a common interest in terms of going against Muslims and Pro-Palestine campaigners.

Paul Besser has been seen with Paul (former British National Party activist and organiser and present leader of Britain First) and with Jayda Fransen (formerly Britain First Deputy Leader and now involved in the leadership of the British Freedom Party due to stand in elections in Scotland to challenge Nicola Sturgeon for a seat in the Scottish Parliament).  

It can be said that Anti-Semitism campaigners are very close to Tommy Robinson (Stuart Lennox) and have been involved in campaigning for Tommy Robinson and have participated in rallies supporting Tommy Robinson. Anti-Semitism campaigners have also been involved with Anne Marie Waters (leader of For Britain) that also has an anti-Muslim narrative and has supporters that usually attend rallies, supporting Israel and are not favourable to the cause of Palestine. Former members of National Front and British National Party have publicly joined Anne Marie Waters. It must be said that Anne Marie Waters is a former member of UKIP that became disassocited from UKIP because of her views on Islam.

We know from the media (i.e. The Independent newspaper online) that there have been reports of threats made by Tommy Robinson against journalist like Lizzie Dearden that constantly classify Tommy Robinson as Far Right activist.

All three - Tommy Robinson (former BNP), Paul Golding (former BNP) and Jayda Fransen (former BNP and now associated with Nick Griffin (former BNP Leader) and Jim Dowson (former financial supporter of the BNP and founder of Britain First), have been convicted for incidents against Muslims in the United Kingdom. The question to ask is: are pro-Israel and anti-Semitism activists in the United Kingdom actively cooperating with the British Far Right to go against Muslims and those who support the cause of Palestine?

Tommy Robinson - Pro-Israel and anti-Islam

The links are apparently everywhere. It looks like some media are playing both sides at the same time. On the one hand they condemn Far Right activists for engaging in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, but they don't seem to want to talk about the obvious marriage of convenience between some anti-Semitism activists and the Far Right engaged in campaigns against Muslims in the United Kingdom.

Many politicians and many in the mass media are being less than honest by talking about issues when it suits their agenda and looking the other way when it doesn't suit their agenda.

Paul Besser and Jayda Fransen

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

Introduction:

In the midst of an international crisis generated by the spread of Corona Virus, other battles are being fought. The apparent disappearance of the British National Party from the political arena under what Adam Walker and Clive Jefferson - present Leader and Deputy Leader - defined as "new leadership style", the BNP became a ghost in British politics. This led to the formation of groups like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters. Her attempt to fill up the void has been shown as no more than sheer opportunism using part of the political agenda of the British National Party and mixing it with contents that never had anything to do with British Nationalism.

More than once, Anne Maria Waters has found herself "in choppy seas", trying and failing to define a coherent agenda. On the one hand, she talks about keeping Britain British. On the other, she has a liberal agenda that goes very much against keeping Britain British. On the one hand, she states that she rejects the ways of the British National Party and of traditional British Nationalism and on the other hand she is surrounded by elements of the BNP that constitute the core of For Britain.

For a while, she had the support of British Nationalists, despite the fact that many of her stances go directly against fundamental values of British Nationalism. Having said that, the publication of a video launching a frontal attack against British Nationalists and using the usual tools used by others to misrepresent British Nationalism, she appears to have shot herself in the foot. Some comentators have indicated that the hatred she has expressed against Islam has more to do with her own sexual preferences than with a genuine attempt to keep Britain British. For Britain seems to be a one man band or, to put it more appropriately, a one woman band.

Essay:

"Nationalists up and down the country were struck with astonishment following publication, Friday April 10th, of a YouTube video by For Britain leader, Anne Marie Waters, attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative.

Questions are now being asked as to who - or what - could have triggered Ms Waters into humiliating herself and her party in a move that further deepens the divide between civic and ethno-nationalists.

To answer the question, we perhaps need to look at events dating back twelve months or so, when certain prominent figures within the Tommy Robinson and For Britain movements widened their reading lists to include works on the Frankfurt School and Holocaust Revisionism. One such notable figure, Shazia Hobbs, was a regular contributor to TR News - a website dedicated to Tommy Robinson, apparently run by staunch Tommy advocate and self-confessed "Nazi Jew", Avi Yemeni, currently residing in Australia. As Shazia's interest and knowledge increased, she published a feature on TR News entitled  "Hypocrisy". As most people know, the Tommy Robinson movement has no problem with any criticism of Islam; less so when the criticism is directed at Judaism. Without explanation, Shazia's article was quietly removed from the website by TR News editors.

Shortly after, Tommy again found himself behind bars. In a disastrous PR move, marking the beginning of the end for the Tommy movement, TR News published a video entitled "How to Burn a Nazi". The video was a brutal, unwarranted attack on Patriotic Alternative leader, Mark Collett, Shazia Hobbs and another former prominent Team Tommy activist, Dionne Møller aka Secret Sources. It's necessary to remind readers here that the video was published using the name of Tommy Robinson whilst Tommy himself was in prison. From then on, support for Tommy Robinson began to fade, which is hardly surprising. Tommy was seen to have stabbed some of his brightest and best elements in the back: elements who are true British patriots, born and bred in this country, unlike Avi of Oz and Brian of Tel Aviv.

At the same time, over the past few months, interest in ethno-nationalism and, in particular, Patriotic Alternative (PA) has increased, notably by way of contributions from a new wave of younger, talented content creators, who understand the plight facing future generations and who are motivated enough to seek and campaign for reasonable solutions. Citing the infamous 14 words, these youngsters, mainly inspired by Mark Collett, PA deputy leader Laura Towler and other prominent figures within PA circles, propose feasible strategies with which to tackle public opinion on the demographic crisis facing the British Isles and the west in general. Making the most out of the COVID19 Lockdown, for example, an army of online Groypers have been brigading suitable political targets. (Check out Natty's calls to LBC's Nick Ferrari and UNWAShED's livestreams on YouTube). Last month, the second ever Patriotic Alternative conference was held just outside London. The event was a huge success, attended by 200 smartly-dressed patriots from all walks of life and of all ages, with the youngest just 15 years of age.

Now, fast forward to Ms Waters' uncanny decision to put out a less vicious but nonetheless similar video to "How to burn a Nazi", attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative. As noted in the recent article on this blog, Ms Waters' and Tommy were - and possibly still are – quite close associates. Both follow the counter-jihad line, shrivelling in horror and squealing like leftists at the slightest mention of one particular ethnic community or of certain aspects of WW2 historiography.

The strategy used by Anne Marie Waters in her video - namely, to defame and smear her political rivals as "racists" who wish to "round up black people" – has backfired spectacularly, as seen by the swift removal of her video shortly after it had been shared on the TR News Telegram channel :
Presumably, someone ordered Avi Yemeni to take the video down. The YouTube original - where comments were originally disabled and then reactivated following complaints - has received a battering, both in the comments section and in the thumbs-up thumbs-down ratio. At the time of writing, there are just 800 likes to 1.6k dislikes.

So, why did Ms Waters choose to shoot herself and her own party in the foot? Was she badly advised by someone in her entourage? At the beginning of the video, filmed Friday morning, she mentions being flooded with messages about Patriotic Alternative and Mark Collett...

Certain sources appear to believe that Ms Waters was shown a photograph posted the previous evening on Facebook, showing Shazia Hobbs together with persecuted singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz in attendance at the recent PA conference.

No doubt that there are spies on Alison Chabloz’s Facebook page who sometimes send information to Hope Not Hate (HNH). Definite proof of this was seen last year when HNH Head of Intel, Matthew Collins, fished several of Alison's "friends only" posts from her timeline and then posted them on Twitter. The social media platform forced Collins to delete. But that is beside the point.

At the same time Ms Waters' published her video, the banner on her YouTube channel was changed. The banner now features a photograph of Ms Waters, also in the company of Shazia, taken at a 2016 demo.










Ms Waters' move provoked this reaction from Shazia:

To complicate matters further, Matthew Collins and the rest of the Hope Not Hate cabal aren't the only ones champing at the bit to have Alison Chabloz once again clamped in irons - for singing songs. Unlike Ms Waters and many other civic and ethno-nationalists, Alison has never been associated with the Tommy Robinson movement. On the contrary, her legal troubles are the direct result of Alison being targeted by people within Team Tommy, and in particular via the dirty deeds of Ambrosine Shitrit from London.

Mrs Shitrit is known to have financially supported Tommy fans, paying travel costs and hotels to ensure large crowds at pro-Tommy demos and court hearings. Indeed, the day Alison Chabloz was convicted, all the news headlines were grabbed... you've guessed it! - by Tommy Robinson getting himself arrested outside Leeds Crown Court. And that's not all: whilst Tommy was stealing media attention up in Leeds, a posse of his close associates, including Jonathan Hoffman and Sharon Klaff, rolled up outside Alison's court case, waving Israeli flags, cheering her conviction and displaying aggressive behaviour towards her supporters.

Who persuaded Tommy that it was a wise idea to go to Leeds that day, in possible breach of a court order..? - A move that did eventually see Tommy back in jail.

Admittedly, there is no evidence of Mrs Shitrit or Hope Note Hate sending the photo of Shazia and Alison at the Patriotic Alternative conference to Ms Waters. There is, however, a third possibility.

Readers will perhaps remember an ongoing Battle of Wills between Alison Chabloz and ex-model, Michele Renouf, which culminated in a series of defamatory articles about Alison, penned by two of Mrs Renouf's closest allies, Richard Edmonds and Peter Rushton. Four articles in total were published, labelling Alison as "a traitor and a saboteur", demanding her "surgical removal from movement circles" and even holding her responsible for the death of Professor Robert Faurisson (who was 89 years old at the time).

Last May, Rushton threatened to sue Alison Chabloz in a remarkable move that ensured he would no longer be able to mention her name without being immediately ridiculed.

Since then, others have carried the torch on behalf of Mrs Renouf, attempting to characterise Alison as a “leftist lover of Islam” whenever the opportunity arises. The schema, like the sockpuppetry, is predictable, as seen in this series of comments published by the same people under two videos, published six months' apart:

Note the comment above by "Jack Doe" (one of the pseudos used by ex-BNP electoral candidate, Julie Lake from Bristol) that Alison Chabloz would be "out of the loop"... It must have come as a nasty shock to learn that Alison Chabloz was welcomed by Mark and Laura into the Patriotic Alternative movement. The news also appears to have left Hope Not Hate speechless, for once. Furthermore, Alison's presence at the Patriotic Alternative conference and her work with the Patriotic Groypers must be absolutely devastating, both for Ambrosine Shitrit and for Michele Renouf.

These people will stop at nothing. Ambrosine Shitrit continues to lie and smear on social media and, worse still, the Rushton-Renouf camp appears to be spreading further damaging rumours that Mark Collett would be responsible for having caused a massive split in the movement. A sure sign of desperation and, of course, highly ironic, coming from those who are in fact responsible for having engineered the split in the first place. They didn't attend the PA conference, and they were not missed in the slightest.

This latest split in the movement is probably the best thing to have happened in British nationalist politics for over a decade. The chaff have sorted themselves out from the wheat, into their own little ghetto,  now further removed from the main stage of British nationalism than even the Team Tommy civ-nats.

We will probably never know who was responsible for tipping Anne Marie Waters over the edge and undermining any slim chance she has left of gaining authority and credibility. Natural justice has been served. Here and now, we as nationalists must focus on the essential and spread the 14 words: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

Source: Nationalist Forum

Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters

The tragedy of so called British Nationalism is that some of those portraying themselves as British Nationalists are driven by arguments that have little to do with promoting British interests. Confusing arguments born out of desperation in an attempt to be politically meaningful.

In a conversation I had with Anne Marie Waters, the key issue was that meetings organised by Anne Marie Waters and those linked to Anne Marie Waters kept being cancelled or rejected indicating that those who own venues or manage venues don't wish to be associated with Anne Marie Waters.

In politics, perception is critically important. For Britan, has incorporated elements of the British National Party that were associated with the very same ideas that Anne Marie Waters says that she rejects. None other than Julian Leppert was elected Councillor representing the British National Party and now he represents For Britain as Councillor - their only Councillor.

It appears that Anne Marie Waters hasn't done her research properly. In a desperate attempt to build a power base, she has incorporated members of the Far Right that were and are directly linked to the very same things that she talks against. 

Here, Anne Marie Waters appears surrounded by prominent figures of the British National Party, including Eddy Butler, the mastermind of the British National Party electoral success in Barking and Dagenham that got 12 Councillor elected and one of the British National Party stalwarts that got Richard Barnbrook elected as Member of the London Assembly. She might persuade those who are not aware of the political background of her core supporters. I don't think that Anne Marie Waters is a naive individual. I think that she is being disingenous.

The comment made by a well-known political activist was 'I think that she was very badly advised to make a video attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative'. Mark Collett was also a prominent British National Party member.

Jeffrey Marshall, also a prominent British Party member, posed as a friend of Jewish Communities. Here he was at a Synagogue, wearing a yamaka and taking part in a religious ceremony.   

Most of the core members of For Britain, including the only elected representative (Julian Leppert), have one thing is common. They are all former members of the British National Party. What led Anne Marie Waters to publish a video directly attacking Patriotic Alternative? 

The British National Party is everywhere. It is in For Britain, in Patriotic Alternative and in Britain First as Paul Golding was also a prominent member of the British National Party. Many of those supporting Tommy Robinson - including Tommy Robinson himself - can be traced back to the British National party. In fact, For Britain and several other groups are the direct consequence of the fragmentation of the British National Party that went though a similar process as the National Front from which it derived.

Here you see Tommy Robinson at a British National Party meeting listening to Richard Edmonds. Was Tommy Robinson unaware of the ideas of Richard Edmonds who was a vital link with National Front? I have met Tommy Robinson quite a few times. I don't think that Tommy Robinson was or is a naive individual. He left the BNP and went on to join the English Defense League that is fervently anti-Islam. In 2013, he left the English Defense League, criticized EDL, but took over its anti-Islam platform that he shares with Anne Marie Waters.

In fact, all groups that came out of the British National Party and the British National Party itself share the anti-Islam platform. Fragmentation was not the consequence of ideological differences. Fragmentation was very much the consequence of personalities and internal feuds.

At practically all rallies in support of Tommy Robinson or Anne Marie Waters, you see Israeli flags. This would lead some operators to think that Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters are supporters of Zionists and of the State of Israel. Are they? How much do Jewish Communities actually support Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters?

In the muddy world of British politics, it is difficult to know who stands for what. This is why, regardless of any statements of Anne Marie Waters - as long as much of her power base is directly traceable to the British National Party - her attempts to disassociate herself from certain political platforms will not change public perception. 

Today, Britain is very much focused on the tragedy generated by Corona Virus. Most people don't have the time nor the inclination to engage in profound political analysis and the days in which so many are losing their lives do not seem to be the proper time to discuss certain political issues. When the present health crisis is hopefully over, I believe that Britain will be in many ways a different country.

To rebuild Britain, we will need real politicians working together for the common good. Those existing on the fringes of British politics, driven by personality feuds and empty slogans will be as irrelevant as ever before.