Does the ceremonial have anything to do with Christianity?

 

Does the ceremonial, ritual and clothing have anything to do with Christianity?

For centuries, so called Christian churches and so called Christian organizations have been characterized by all kinds of peculiar attires that have nothing to do with Christianity.

Who invented 'Nuns'? Who said that certain attires had anything to do with the teachings of Jesus? Did Jesus talk about building temples full of statues and decorations or talk about the proclamation of so called saints? No, he did not. Jesus was not immortal. He was made immortal by Emperor Constantine. So all that has been spread for centuries by organised churches has been an an absolute lie. Jesus was prophet, a mortal man that had wife and children. Where did the abstentinence vows come from? Another invention that has served to hide homosexuality and depravity. It is no surprise to learn about sexual abuses within churches.

How does he look like? Like a clown. And there are many of them. Recent scandals are not even the tip of the iceberg.

I recently spoke with two ladies working for the Church of England and ask them why they don't go around spreading the Word of Jesus. They told me that they don't do that because 'we are not Evangelists'. Well, truet Christianity is evangelical. By saying that they are not Evangelical they go against Jesus.

As more and more temples get sold to developers or are taking over by other religious organisations, the fate of the Church of England and other churches is all too obvious.

Muslims are everywhere preaching Islam, in the same way that true Christians went around and go around preaching the word of Jesus. I recently met a group of Muslims in the centre of town. They asked me what languages did I speak and they offered me a copy of the Quran in different languages, including several European languages.

What is the Church of England doing to promote Christianity? Absolutely nothing. Or even worse, with every single scandal, they are proving that the Church of England is a source of corruption of all kinds.

  

Sadiq Khan lost the Uxbridge election with ULEZ, but there is a lot more that should make people worry

 

Just when Labour thought that the Uxbridge by-election was in the bag, Sadiq Khan made his best to ruin Labour's chances of winning the seat of the former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

Sorry, Dad. I didn't know what I was doing. The expression on their faces tell the full story. Labour MPs had alerted that keeping ULEZ was a very bad idea and they pleaded with Sadiq Khan to postpone the implementation of ULEZ. Sadid Khan did not listen and Labour lost a key Parliamentary seat.

Labour voters turned against Labour because Labour voters in that area on the edges of Greater London need their cars and their small businesses depend on business transport and residents have very poor access to public transport so that using a car is often unavoidable. 

The Guardian itself published an article saying that the green revolution is not taking into account the needs of ordinary people that cannot afford to pay for it. Has Labour turned its back on the British people? Climate extremists, apart from making fools of themselves, are turning people off and Labour's association with Stop Oil is a losing card. Central London Labour has lost the plot. Outside London, stauch Labour supporters are t leaving the Labour Party. In one particular case, a Labour mayoral candidate resigned his party membership and is standing as an independent because London Labour did not want him to stand to represent his constituents.

Keir Starmer is making one mistake after another and keeping quiet when he should speaking loudly. One particular scenario is when politicians of both sides of the divide spoke against the cancellation of bank accounts for political reasons. He was very quick to talk about women with penises, but he is mute when he should be defending democratic rights. After all, Chris Bryant MP is reported to have been behind a hate campaign aiming at silencing people who do not agree with his views.

Strange political animal, Chris Bryant was originally a member of the Conservative Party, but he joined the Labour party in 1986. He even tried to work as Priest, was ordained Deacon in 1986 and Priest in 1987, but decided that being a priest and being gay were incompatible. Years later, he would have reconsidered his decision to abandon the priesthood as the Church of England is now promoting homosexuality and multiple genders and say that the Lords Prayer should be abandoned.

The British Broadcasting Corporation is in cahouts with individuals that are threatening political rights and human rights. Two prominent BBC went suddenly quiet when it was revealed that a Natwest CEO Dame Alison Rose was behind the closure of an undetermined number of bank accounts for political reasons and among those accounts were the accounts of Nigel Farage. The plotters were found out and exposed and public apologies had to be made. Keir Starmer has not spoken about it, Chris Bryant has not spoken about it and Jon Sopel and Simon Jack in spite of apologies should be fired for participating in a criminal plot as willing accomplices of Dame Alison Rose.  

Jeremy Corbyn: No way back, says Starmer

 

Keir Starmer stated today what right now seems the obvious course of action: Jeremy Corbyn will not be allowed to stand as a Labour candidate. This is the statement today February 15th 2023.

What brought Jeremy Corbyn down was not Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, but Jeremy Corby's stances on Palestine and the cause of the people of Palestine. 

Jeremy Corbyn was brought down because of issues that very much divide the people of Israel. Jeremy Corbyn was also targetted because of his geopolitical views and because his views on economics. No doubts about that. Now, it is up to those who genuinely support Jeremy Corbyn's views to remain or not to remain as Labour Party members and this is something Labour Party members and voters will have to consider looking forward to the 2024 Parliamentary Election. There is no guarantees either in terms of Keir Starmer being the Labour Party Prime Ministerial candidate in 2024. Keir Starmer was brought in to replace Jeremy Corbyn and now that Jeremy Corbyn is out, why should Keir Starmer remain as leader? This is a case that Keir Starmer will have to make himself and especially when he is at odds with the trade union movement that very much finances the Labour Party.

For a man that does not dare to publicly define what a woman is, things will not be easy as another leader who came up with unsavoury stances on sexuality came to realise. Nicola Sturgeon said that 'the issue regarding transgender and transexuality was not the issue that broke the camel's back.' Well, Nicola Sturgeon in on the way out and perhaps not just because of 'the issue that didn't break the came's back'. As Nicola Sturgeon recognized, Scotland is not a united country and the SNP is not a united party and remaining as SNP leader was not a viable proposition as she defined herself as a very divisive leader.

Having stated that she has campaigned from a very early age for Scottish Independence, she clearly stated that remaining as First Minister would only undermine the cause for independence as more and more people will turn against her because of issues that are not related to Scottish Independence. She clearly stated that the longer she stays as First Minister politics will turn to be more about personalities than about a proper debate.

Failings in terms of governance - the state of the Scottish NHS comes to mind - and controversial policies that are not supported by members of her own party - might have sealed her political fate.

And talking about fate, the Church of England is under assault. Militant Homosexuals are trying to force the Church of England to abandon Christian values in favour of political correctness and this is proving to be extremely corrosive. 

From media reports: 

The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Rev Justin Welby has spoken of being "threatened with parliamentary action" in an attempt to "force same-sex marriage" into the Church of England.

He was speaking at the global Anglican Consultative Council meeting in Ghana.

It comes after reforms within the church allowing the blessing of same-sex couples in civil partnerships.

The change was made after a motion was passed by the General Synod, the church's legislative body, this month.

Its position on gay marriage will not change and same-sex couples will still be unable to marry in church.

The Telegraph reports Mr Welby met with MPs at the House of Commons last month, and pushed back on further changes to its status on same-sex marriage.

Speaking ahead of the changes, broadcaster Sandi Toksvig said a meeting in January with the archbishop, last month was "very disappointing".

Ms Toksvig is a high-profile campaigner on LGBT+ issues, and although not a member of the church, she told the BBC she spoke out because she felt the impact of the message being sent out by the bishops was having an impact far beyond the Church.

The changes in the church have been unpalatable to some conservatives, but also fall well short of what many progressives had wanted.

Giving the presidential address on Sunday, Mr Welby said "many" members of the General Synod have "dismissed" his concerns about recent reforms.

• Sandi Toksvig: I can't let the Church hurt LGBT people
• Church of England backs plans to bless gay couples

He told those at the meeting, held in the Ghanian capital Accra "rules about sexuality in the Church of England" have been tabled for discussion as a "result" of growing atheism in the UK.

The archbishop said in the global north, Christian values of "community and mutual responsibility" have been "almost eliminated" in favour of "individualism".

Undoubtedly, Britain is in a state of flux at every level and there is an abundance of examples showing that the United Kingdom is a very disunited Kingdom. It comes as no surprise that more and more people will be tempted to take matters into their own hands to defend what they believe in and this is certainly a recipe for more and more confrontation.

PC Palmer was executed by Political Correctness

PC Keith Palmer was executed by Political Correctness

For decades, Britain has allowed in individuals that support an ideology that is contrary to a civilised society and those in charge of protecting society are falling prey of such murderous ideology.

For more than sixteen years, followers of the said murderous ideology raped, drugged, plied with alcohol and killed vulnerable children that were supposed to be protected by the State and public officials looked the other way for fear of being called racists.

Lee Rigby was beheaded by individuals who converted to the said ideology and the same happened to PC Keith Palmer. Mosques and other religious centres were used to promote terrorism and murder. No one should have the right to walk around with their faces hidden behind a veil. No one should be allowed to use women and children to enrich themselves by exploiting them with the excuse of being followers of the said ideology and no one should be sent to jail for protesting against the said barbaric murderous ideology.

How many people will have to die before the Political Correct Society finally acknowledges that Islam is incompatible with Western Civilisation? Female Genital Mutilation, Forced Marriages, Honour Killings, Rape and Terrorist Attacks are all happening because of Islam. Hundreds of Muslims are fleeing from the barbarity of this murderous ideology. Where do they seek refuge? They seek refuge in Christian/Judeo countries.

In Syria and in Iraq, women that had been forced to live under the tyranny of Islam, burned the garments imposed on them by the murderous ideology, but we have politicians, mass media and celebrities defending the symbols of oppression and murder.

Those who promote LGBT should be consistent with their beliefs and stop supporting the murderous ideology. Many homosexual Muslims live in fear and many are terrified of being sent back to their countries of origin.

Men and women are equals and should be treated as equals. For centuries, women have fought against discrimination and for equal political rights. Did the suffragettes fight and in some cases died fighting for equal rights for women for the Political Correct Society to kiss the ass of a murderous ideology that ignores women's rights? Where is the Feminist Movement when the murderous ideology is trying to destroy women's rights? 

Where is the Church of England? Most probably the Church of England is busy trying to excuse and justify the excesses of the murderous ideology that they call Religion of Peace. The Religion of Peace is killing people everywhere and we are forced to spend more and more to protect ourselves against the threat of Terrorism inspired by the Religion of Peace. The Leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party recently called for Muslims Only Prisons. That would be easy to achieve since about 85 per cent of inmates in British jails are Muslim and prisons are being used to turn people into extremists.

Do you know how much money it costs to keep one inmate in a British jail? Do you know how much money is being paid under the cover of Political Correctness to pseudo families? Do you know how much money and manpower the Security Services are spending to counter the threat of terrorism created by the Religion of Peace? And all this is happening when government and local authorities lack the resources to invest in housing, education, health, transport and meet other fundamental needs.

The Religion of Peace is a Disease like Cancer and Aids.