White Europeans and Black Africans worked together, traded together, to enslave other black African peoples.
In fact, African kings sold their own peoples to European traders. The idea that Africans could sell Africans is abhorrent but it is very much the way in which the slavery trade prospered.
As the song of the Cabaret movie goes ´money makes the world go around´. Even today there are individuals that would willingly sell their own countrymen and countrywoman for a profit. You do not have to go too far to find such individuals. Politicians of a certain political party now in government have received generous donations from a certain community and those donations are dictating British Foreign Policy.
Yes, it happend hundreds of years ago and it is happening right now in the United Kingdom.
Everybody is expecting big changes in national and international politics. Panama Canal built by USA to be controlled by USA. Another USA State or more than one new USA States? And when you talk about the Gulf, it might not be about Middle East or Asia Minor but closer to home as the Gulf of Mexico becomes the Gulf of America.
Will Keir Starmer, Zelensky and Ursula von der Leyen be invited to the inauguration of the new American President? Another bit of 'let's wait and see'. Will the now British Foreign Secretary that has repeatedly insulted President Donald Trump be invited to the ceremonial and very formal occasion?
We know that happened to Governor Trudeau that soonafter a meeting with President Trump was given his marching orders. Will other politicians be given their marching orders? Again, let's wait and see. In Germany, a Federal Election can dramatically change the political environment in Germany and in France the new Prime Minister is fighting for his survival and being threatened with a no confidence vote. Will he last until July 2025 when new French Assembly Elections can take place.
And in Britain, Keir Starmer is losing cabinet members as trees lose leaves in the autumn. Will Rachel Reeves remain in her post? Let's see what she can come up with in the new budget. Although inflation is said to have fallen, the fall has nothing to do with announced financial measures that will only come into effect in April 2025. Let's see what happens to inflation after April 2025 when the real picture of the British economy will come to the surface.
Adolf Hitler said that once war starts there are no civilians. This goes together with the Lion's Logic.
Lion's have to fight with other Lions to assert their power and when they prevail the most probable outcome is that the cubs of the defeated Lion are killed.
My father explained the Lion's Logic to me in very simple terms. If you allow the children of your enemies to survive, they will be a constant danger to your own existence.
The reason the Jews, men, women and children, were sent to the camps for extermination is that Germany was following the Lion's Logic. You don't allow children to live to become a threat to your own existence. The fact that Zionism and Israel do exist proves that Adolf Hitler was right in this regard. If you allow any survivors then your own survival will be in doubt.
The logic of the Palestinian conflict between Palestinian and Jews is living proof that since the Lion's Logic is not being applied. As long as Palestinian children are left alive and as lond as Jewish children are left alive the conflict will go on and on and on. Extermination is the only sure solution.
In war there are no civilians. There are only friends and foes. All sides proved that there are no civilians. The thought when bombing British cities and when bombing German cities was pretty evident. There were no civilians. There were Britons and Germans and the idea was to kill as many as possible to prevail. The defeated don't make good material. The sick and the infirm don't make good material. The disabled don't make good material. The sexually dysfunctional - including those mentally sexually dysfunctional - must be exterminated to build a stronger nation. Violence exists for a very good reason.
Refugees are inferior people. People who refuse to stand up and fight.
https://www.facebook.com/nationalistforum
Multiculturalism? Diversity? Well, the Labour Party and usual supporter of mass migration now realises that it has been promoting war and violence in Britain. Reading comments written by Jews in the UK it is plainly visible that Jews talk about being targetted, about not walking outside their Jewish areas.
In fact, Britain has imported conflicts and now the said conflicts are going to be played out in Britain. Angela Merkel said it out loud: Multikulti ist tot. (Multiculturalism is dead.) Not that too many people managed to understand that the person saying it was none other than the one who had been promoting open borders for the European Union and taking countries to European courts for rejecting open borders.
Frauke Petry went as far as calling for migrants to be shot dead if they tried to enter Germany. Then somebody noticed what Frauke Petry said, but continued to ignore what Angela Merkel had said.
Britain has not built integration. Britain has built ghettos and whenever there is a geopolitcal crisis, those ghettos become alive. Suella Braverman does not have the common sense necessary to understand that she should not side with any of the parties in the conflict. A proposal to ban the Palestinian flag was a declaration of war against Muslim communities in Britain because in this conflict there are religious and ethnic factors that many are failing to understand.
As an outsider, I see the makings of Holocaust Round Two. As long as the USA continues to support a bankrupt Israeli government and its policies of occupation and oppression, Jews will never be safe.
Now, we have got the Labour Party at war. Mayor of London: Muslim. Scottish First Minister: Muslim. Labout MPs left and right: Muslim. Labour Councillors already resigning. Firstly, Covid, Secondly, the European crisis and energy prices. Thirdly, Palestine. A never ending series of scandals and crisis.
If things get out of control, the years of the IRA will seem like Paradise.
Present inhabitants of Israel are much more closely related to the peoples of the countries where they lived for centuries than to the original inhabitants of those we came to know as Jews. The creation of the State of Israel is in fact part of yet another European Crusade and this has been very much part of the problem since the very beginning. Zionism is much more associated with ideology than it is associated with religion. Even today, despite many decades, there are clear differences between different brands of Judaism, but some are more powerful than others. The creation of a racial theocratic state was a disastrous mistake. The arrival of massive numbers of white Europeans elicited an immediate reaction.
What brought Jeremy Corbyn down was not Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, but Jeremy Corby's stances on Palestine and the cause of the people of Palestine.
Jeremy Corbyn was brought down because of issues that very much divide the people of Israel. Jeremy Corbyn was also targetted because of his geopolitical views and because his views on economics. No doubts about that. Now, it is up to those who genuinely support Jeremy Corbyn's views to remain or not to remain as Labour Party members and this is something Labour Party members and voters will have to consider looking forward to the 2024 Parliamentary Election. There is no guarantees either in terms of Keir Starmer being the Labour Party Prime Ministerial candidate in 2024. Keir Starmer was brought in to replace Jeremy Corbyn and now that Jeremy Corbyn is out, why should Keir Starmer remain as leader? This is a case that Keir Starmer will have to make himself and especially when he is at odds with the trade union movement that very much finances the Labour Party.
For a man that does not dare to publicly define what a woman is, things will not be easy as another leader who came up with unsavoury stances on sexuality came to realise. Nicola Sturgeon said that 'the issue regarding transgender and transexuality was not the issue that broke the camel's back.' Well, Nicola Sturgeon in on the way out and perhaps not just because of 'the issue that didn't break the came's back'. As Nicola Sturgeon recognized, Scotland is not a united country and the SNP is not a united party and remaining as SNP leader was not a viable proposition as she defined herself as a very divisive leader.
Failings in terms of governance - the state of the Scottish NHS comes to mind - and controversial policies that are not supported by members of her own party - might have sealed her political fate.
And talking about fate, the Church of England is under assault. Militant Homosexuals are trying to force the Church of England to abandon Christian values in favour of political correctness and this is proving to be extremely corrosive.
From media reports:
The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Rev Justin Welby has spoken of being "threatened with parliamentary action" in an attempt to "force same-sex marriage" into the Church of England.
He was speaking at the global Anglican Consultative Council meeting in Ghana.
It comes after reforms within the church allowing the blessing of same-sex couples in civil partnerships.
The change was made after a motion was passed by the General Synod, the church's legislative body, this month.
Its position on gay marriage will not change and same-sex couples will still be unable to marry in church.
The Telegraph reports Mr Welby met with MPs at the House of Commons last month, and pushed back on further changes to its status on same-sex marriage.
Speaking ahead of the changes, broadcaster Sandi Toksvig said a meeting in January with the archbishop, last month was "very disappointing".
Ms Toksvig is a high-profile campaigner on LGBT+ issues, and although not a member of the church, she told the BBC she spoke out because she felt the impact of the message being sent out by the bishops was having an impact far beyond the Church.
The changes in the church have been unpalatable to some conservatives, but also fall well short of what many progressives had wanted.
Giving the presidential address on Sunday, Mr Welby said "many" members of the General Synod have "dismissed" his concerns about recent reforms.
He told those at the meeting, held in the Ghanian capital Accra "rules about sexuality in the Church of England" have been tabled for discussion as a "result" of growing atheism in the UK.
The archbishop said in the global north, Christian values of "community and mutual responsibility" have been "almost eliminated" in favour of "individualism".
Undoubtedly, Britain is in a state of flux at every level and there is an abundance of examples showing that the United Kingdom is a very disunited Kingdom. It comes as no surprise that more and more people will be tempted to take matters into their own hands to defend what they believe in and this is certainly a recipe for more and more confrontation.
Listening to politicians, to the mass media and even to the present Head of Nato, one would believe that what happened in Europe 70 or so years ago never happened.
As the build up for yet another European-wide war continues, we see that the memories of World War Two are been flashed away to encourage the new generations to get involved in yet another war - and perhaps the final war for millennia to come as it is more than likely that nuclear weapons will be used to erase every single European capital. Talking about the merits of Democracy, what is happening right now speaks volumes against Democracy. Democracy is a political form of governance that gives a blank cheque to politicians to erase Humanity from planet Earth.
Politicians do not represent us and they simply use the powers given to them to do as they please and lead us towards Armageddon. Strikes happening right now in Britain, the state of upheaval in Britain, was created by catastrophic geopolitical decisions that led to economic instability that mixed with an arms race will not only cause instability, but will also push us towards extinction.
Those who remember what happened after Chernobyl - it was merely an accident that affected reactors at an energy plant - know full well what will happen if a Nuclear Holocaust is triggered intentionally. The entire continent will be uninhabitable for ages to come. Our way of life will be gone forever. Thousands of years of social and technological evolution will be wiped out. Whoever manages to survive will have to live in a human jungle without any rules. It will be about killing or being killed in a state of widespread lethal anarchy. This is Mad Max World.
We must prepare for a new world in which the weak will be naturally exterminated and natural selection will determine who lives and who dies, a world without mercy. In this new world, Charles Darwin's evolution rules will be more apparent than ever before. In a lawless world, only the strong and the most brutal will have the slightest chance to live another day.
This was Germany by the end of World War Two. This might be Europe by the end of World War Three.
Far Right groups and Muslim Extremists are rubbing their hands with glee. In the fog of war Jews in Europe will be exterminated. This is catastrope and is almost upon is. War in Europe will create fertile ground for it to happen.
British military history is not free from tragic examples of delusion leading to catastrophic events. The Narvik campaign is just one of them when forces went to Narvik without air cover, without artillery, without naval cover and without the necessary winter equipment only to be slaughtered by the Wehrmacht from sea, air and land, event that led to the fall of the government of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.
Another example of delusion was the sending of two naval
units to Asia, once again without air cover, to be sunk by Japanese torpedo
aircraft or the bad arrangements in Singapore that led to the fall of Singapore
with the arrival of British and Commonwealth troops that only arrived in time
to surrender to Japanese troops.
Another example of delusion was the badly planned campaign in
the Netherlands by Marshall Montgomery known as Market Garden that was bound to
be a disaster with the delivery of Polish paratroopers on the third day that
were killed before they set foot in the Netherlands and supplies that were
thrown straight into the hands of the Wehrmacht due to lack of proper
communications.
Never mind the failed Suez Campaign launched by Anthony Eden
or Churchill Gallipoli Campaign.
More recent disasters were the campaign in Afghanistan and in
Iraq launched by Tony Blair under false pretences with fabricated evidence
about WMDs that never existed and created massive waves of refugees,
destabilizing even more regions like Asia Minor and Middle East that were
already unstable leading to the rise of Islamic State and events that are well
known.
But now we are dealing with an even more worrying situation
when Britain is about to engage in a military conflict that could engulf the
whole of Europe under a government that has systematically reduced the strength
both in terms of material resources and of numbers of the British Armed Forces.
How on Earth are we talking about cutting down the numbers of the British Armed
Forces a time when everybody is talking about impending doom?
Simon Jenkins writing on The Guardian spoke about how unwise
it would be to commit Britain to a military effort in Ukraine and a lady writer
writing on The Independent asked the question about American attempts to drive
the Russian Federation to a war that the Russian Federation does not want.
How many times is Britain going to make the same kind of
disastrous mistakes that lead to tragedy? How many times politicians that
should be in a privileged position to prevent a catastrophe act as if they were
completely unaware of the consequences? Reports about British cooperation with
Ukraine are laughable. Do you really believe that a few anti-tank weapons will
prevent an assault by a country that drove the Wehrmacht across Europe all the
way back to Berlin? Do you know the history of the Soviet Union of which the
Russian Federation was the real driver? Do you think that wars can be won
without committing troops on the battlefield?
People in Britain should be told what will really happen if a
military conflict in Europe begins because their children are going to be sent
to the battlefield to die as children died before in many wars like the First
World War and the Second World War. As Sergei Ivanov stated, if there is a
conflict you can forget about the Nuclear Deterrent and about ‘weapons of
pinpoint accuracy’. This will be a military conflict that will engulf Europe
and it will be a protracted war that will make the Afghanistan campaign and the
Iraqi campaign look like child’s play.
As always, we hear about the green agenda and the rising costs
of energy that can certainly cripple many European economies including the
British economy. What do you think the effects of a widespread conflict in
Europe will be when it comes to energy supplies and the link with inflationary
forces? What do you think the social and political consequences will be if
economies become critically unstable to the point when there are very unwanted
developments?
When Germany was falling 70 or so years ago, Adolf Hitler
prophesized the rise of a new Germany when the two colossus of the time –
America and the Soviet Union – were to face each other on the battlefield. Do
you know that there are groups in Europe that are rubbing their hands with glee
thinking about what they will do if there is war in Europe? For decades now,
Europe has been dealing with the scourge of Islamic Extremists. Can you imagine
a Europe in which both Islamic Extremists and Far Right elements will have a
free hand to do whatever they please because governments will be involved in
fighting a European war?
It is not just about being sensible and realistic. It is
about not guaranteeing what cannot be guaranteed. It is about avoiding pompous
and affected statements that are a far cry away from reality. It is about mass
media control not to create an environment leading to war, environment that
could lead to reprisals in the United Kingdom. In the event of war, it will
take very little for people to start hunting people in the United Kingdom. I
have heard people in the UK say that war in Europe is being promoted by Jews in
the United Kingdom. I listen to people, and I am concerned about the
consequences. I have a dialogue with a Jewish friend in Nevada, USA and we
speak about situations happening in Europe right now that are being treated as
black and white, as cowboys and Indians, with political postures that could
lead to a massive tragedy.
If attitudes in some circles in the West don’t change for the
better, we could be faced with very foreseeable consequences.
There was a Liberal Democrat politician who say that the country needs another centrist political party that could offer an alternative to the Conservative Party and it would not be the Liberal Democrats, but perhaps a blend of politicians of several political parties that could come together.
The Labour Party owes its birth to the Trade Union Movement, but much has happened in Britain and around the world since then.
Maybe the partition of the Labour Party into two distinct political parties would be the way forward for the Labour Party to disassociate itself from political elements that are now on the fringes of Britain's political life and that very visibly do not share the views of the majority about what should be the political outlook of Britain as a country in Europe and in the World as a whole. The Trade Union Movement is not what it used to be either. The closure of the mines and the loss of jobs in manufacturing weakend the Trade Union Movement as more and more people at work are not affilliated to the Trade Union Movement. When it comes to transport, now that much of transport is delivered via franchises, the Trade Union Movement has less of a say in terms of what happens in the labour market.
When it comes to wealthy supporters, if you are Jewish and run a business, will you support a Labour Party that is visibly anti-Semitic. It could be the case that Keir Starmer never beomes Prime Minister, but it has an important role to play in terms of creating a political party that is a lot less dependent on the Trade Union Movement. There is a new brand of Labour Party supporters coming from Universities. They are not the classical grassroot Labour Party supporters. They are ambitious and much wealthier. They could be sending the message that you don't have to be a rabid Marxist Revolutionary to promote social politicies.
When you look at the history of Socialism, there were plenty of other brands of Socialism before Karl Marx was even born. Getting away from Marxism, the Labour Party could become a more attractive electoral choice for many Britons that profoundly disagree with Marxist and with their methods, that do not want any association with unsavoury regimes.
