Friedrich Merz: One country´s actions can trigger a chain reaction

When Merz predecessor, Angela Merkel, decided to open Germany´s borders, she could not foresee the problems that her approach would create. Suddenly, there were conflicts all over the EU when countries like Poland and Hungary rejected her open borders policies. She lived to regret her decision when she publicly stated "Multikulti ist Tot" and mass migration became so intense that it threatens Schengen Treaty arrangements. In her case, her decision did not involve engaging Germany in an all out war.

Friedrich Merz decision to authorize the use of German long range weapons against the Russian Federation is a completely different cup of tea with catastrophic consequences. Berlin has been told, over and over again (by Berlin I mean the German authorities) that such measure will in effect mean a declaration of war against the Russian Federation and that, therefore, the Russian Federation will be entitled to attack Germany. What Friedrich Merz has done, unitelaterally, is to put every single NATO country on a direct collision course with the Russian Federation.  Now, how can the Russian Federation attack Germany? Nuclear War.

Herr Merz got elected with less than 24% of the vote, taking into account that CDU did not get 24% of the vote. CDU/CSU got about 24% of the vote. His coalition partner - SPD - got 16% of the vote. It remains to be known what the German public actually thinks about Friedrich Merz statement and about the consequences of such statement. 

Friedrich Merz took such decision not as a NATO member. This was not a NATO decision. It was Germany´s decision, but it is a far reaching decision that will undermine Europe. I would say that such decision is not supported by Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. Article 5 refers to defense, not offense. 

Now, Chancellor Merz sent a Panzer group to Lithuania, a country that is pretty close to the Russian Federation. It is easy to see that if there is war between the Russian Federation and Germany then German forces in Lithuania will be targetted. 

We have not seen any reactions from other European countries. Do other countries want to be involved in an all out war? Like Angela Merkel, Friedrich Merz had no consultations with other European countries regarding the statement that he just made. Is this a German thing? i.e. making decisions that will affect everybody else, without even asking what other people in the European Union think about it?

This confirms my belief that Britain´s exit from the European Union was a very good thing. I also believe that dismantling NATO would be the next good thing. Why? Because one country can create a disaster for everybody else. So, if Germany wants war with the Russian Federation, Germany alone can pay the price of such a disastrous decision.

 

If Hitler had won World War Two, there would be no Israel

All Jews should put aside all ideological considerations and use their brains and they would come to the natural conclusion that if Hitler had won World War Two by defeating the Soviet Union, then there would have been no Israel. Right up to the point in 1948 when Israel was born, Palestine had been a British Protectorate. If Britain had lost the war, then Palestine would have become a German Territory. As it happened during World War One, the losers in the war lost most of their colonial territories. It happened to Germany after World War One and it would have happened to Britain and France during World War Two. So vast chuncks of the Middle, Africa and Asia would have come under German Rule and the Japanese would taken over the rest, including vast expanses of China.

Soviet Forces liberated Concentration Camps with the British and the Americans coming in as spectators once Concentration Camps had been taken over by Soviet Troops. The famous Balfour Declaration would have meant absolutely nothing and instead of migrating to Palestine, hundreds of thousands would have ended their lives in concentration camps or worse.

Whatever you might think in ideological terms, facts are facts. I wonder also what would have happened if Unternehmen Barbarossa had never happened. Entire German Divisions would with Panzer would have been available at Normandy. The Normandy Invasion would have ended with tends of thousands of American Troops, British Troops and troops of other nationalities falling prisoners of the German Wehrmacht. It must be remembered that many Europeans of countries occupied by Germany were pro-German and went on to fight for Germany. So nothing was clear cut.

When talking about history, we must put ideology aside and look at the historical facts of what happened on the battlefields.

Looking at the history of Japan and at events leading to the attack in Pearl Harbour, Admiral Yamamoto was totally against the Axis. He thought that signed a deal with Germany was against Japanese best interests. In the end, the Axe was against Germany itself. If the Axis had not existed, then the Americans would have been at war in the Pacific but would not have been at war in Europe, Africa or Middle East. President Roovevelt used Pearl Harbour as justification to spread the war. Germany made a significant mistake when it declared war against the USA.

Looking at present conflicts, it must be remembered that World War Two (or World War One, for that matter) did not happen all at once. There was a series of conflicts that started long before September 1939. Japanese expansion in Asia started long before World War Two. There was also the Spanish Civil War to consider. Each conflict became a step towards the conflict that we know as World War Two.

Hermann Göring: No German cities will ever be bombed = NATO: we can attack the Russian Federation, but the Russian Federation will never attack us.

 

The concept of invincibility is still very much amongst us and we see it in the speeches and statements made by politicians and mass media personalities. We see in news reports and commentary about the conflict in Ukraine.

All the talk about using long range missiles is based on the concept of invincibility and of 'it cannot happen to us'.

Reality is exactly the opposite. A war by proxy can really and truly become a direct military involvement that could see Berlin, London, Paris, Warsaw and many other cities turned into ash and debris with no living soul in them.

We are not in the 1930s and 1940s. We are in 2024. The distances have become a lot shorter. What could be done in months and weeks can now be done in minutes.

It takes 15 minutes for a 100 megaton nuclear device to reach London and there will be scarcely the time to evacuate a city of more than 8 million people during the night and of more than 9 million people during the day. Not that policians, military men, mass media and civilians could take any notice of what could land on top of them all. They have got the same of awareness the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had in 1945. They believe - once again - in the concept of invincibility.  

One only has to read what those posting messages on social media say to know how convinced they are, believing that they can attack somebody else without a care in the world.

Understanbly, people have no personal memories of World War One or World War Two. The scenes of devastation is something that they can see in pictures, but they never had any personal experience of it. I guess those have an idea of what could happen to Europe are now being massacred by Israel and seeing their cities and towns turned into rubble with no living soul in them. It takes time for those who have not been exposed to total destruction to understand they themselves could suffer a similar fate.

Geopolitics: Those who are at the bottom of the pile, get the worst deal

 

What the conflict in Palestine has proven once again that you only get justice if you are powerful. From this point of view Adolf Hitler was absolutely right. The winner will not be accountable. Therefore, the aim is to win by whatever means.

If you have power, you have friends. If you don't have power, you are on your own and bound to suffer the consequences of being weak.

This is why the death of 1400 Israelies was used as a justification to kill more than 36,000 people in Palestine and demolish entire tows and is also used as justification to raid properties and throw out and/or kill its occupants because... because they are not strong enough to resist.

Justice can be bought by having enough powerful friends and enough money. Countries that exist in the most disastrous conditions don't get any financial support. Quite the opposite. They are forced to hand out their national resources while Israel gets several billions of US Dollars and the military support of others including the United Kingdom.

Morality tells that you should not sell weapons used for Genocide, but money is more important that morality and this is why politicians paid by British taxpayers are more than happy to go out and support genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Olaf Scholz: Hesitating man or man deeply aware of the dire consequences of knee jerk reactions

 

An article on The Guardian newspaper qualifies the German Chancellor Olaf Scholz as 'hesitant', supposedly a label for somebody seen as weak or indecisive because he is not fully committing Germany to yeat another war in Europe.

As a German, Olaf Scholz is extremely aware of the consequences of war. He might not have been around during World War II, but he certanly knows about what happened in Germany all the way until 1945 and after that.

Despite all odd, Germany prospered and with a lot of hard work managed to reach an enviable position, leading those who were supposed to be the conquering nations, the winning nations, after World War II.

The recipe for German success? Ingenuity, creativity and a lot of work done from the very beginning in the worst of circumstances. Germany started the way to recovery and excellence as an occupied and devided country. It capital city was not more. Berlin was divided by the victors and for a time Bonn became the capital of the Federal Republic of Germany. Much of its territory had been lost. Much of it was taken by Poland, Prussia was chopped to bits. The DDR was born, the so called Polish corridor - German land - was given to Poland and much of the eastern side of German was also given to Poland. Eastern Prussia was taken by the Soviet Union and is now part of the Russian Federation.

The fall of the Berlin Wall was much celebrated as was celebrated the end of the DDR and the reunification of Germany, a reunification that is very much incomplete as vast expanses of German land are still in other countries.

Olaf Scholz explicitly said that despite the fact that Germany is part of NATO - in fact is still under American occupation and its contitution was not designed by Germans. It was imposed by the USA that maintains a substantial military pressence in the Federal Republic of Germany. So Germany is still an occupied country.

The German Chancellor has to move with extreme caution. He is the head of a coalition that is intrinsically weak and SPD won an election without winning a big number of votes. It was the debacle of CDU/CSU that fell so massively what made it possible for SPD to win an election with less than 30 per cent of the votes cast.

A new party now has more than 21 per cent of electoral support and, unlike SPD that is only represented in 11 of 16 Federal States, Alternative für Deutchland has captured the imagination of German voters to the point that in the last days of the then Chancellor Angela Merkel many elected representatives of CDU were working together with Alternative für Deutchland.

The present German Chancellor knows full well that if things take a turn for the worst the present coalition will not survive. He also knows that after decades of constant lecturing and self-imposed and imposed guilt, the German peoples themselves are reluctant to engage in yet another European war that would be fought not because of German interests, but of American interests that go against German interests. The German peoples are not willing to throw away decades of hard work and prosperity to please the invaders that fragmented Germany and left Germany in ruins.

Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist who hated plastics - Irony and reality

 

Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist who hated plastics

The Führer Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist that stuck to traditional building materials and hated plastics. He was a very practical man that thought that quality was better than quantity. In fact, he strived to improve demographic standards by getting rid of faulty people that had become a burden for the rest of society.

"If you are not fit for purpose, my dear, you should not exist." Overcroding in prisons? Mentally and/or physically challenged? Homosexuals? Alcoholics? No way. Get rid of the lot of them and you will have a stronger people.

Whatever your views, you must recognize the fact that if people are healthy, fit and able to be productive you will have a stronger people and stronger country. Men passing for women with painted nails, skirts and making funny voices? To the wall. Women behaving like men and disregarding their role as women and creators of life? To the wall. Multiculturalism? Diversity? What is that? Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer and rabbits with rabbits and foxes with foxes. No funny business. 

Migrants crossing the Rhein to get into Germany without documents? Really? Use them as targetting practice to train the Wehrmacht. German Police kneeling down on the streets? Really? The one accommodation that they would get - if they got any - would be a cell controlled by the Geheime Staadtpolizei or other temporary accommodation before being put into warmer surroundings.

Look around any country of the so called civilized world? What do you see? 

For decades, people have celebrated the triumph over National Socialist Germany. What are they celebrating? Humanity lost the war. Look what Humanity is becoming. More than 8 billion people, most of which are mentally and/or physically challenged, corrupted by so called Progressive Ideology, seas full of plastic that we humans are eating everyday, a throwaway society that is poisoning the environment and destroying habits. My darlings, Humanity lost World War Two. The issue was not how many millions died. The issue has been how many bastards were left behind that should not have been left behind. We have quantity that is overpowering quality.

Do you know one thing that is growing? The number of inmates that leads to the building of more and more prisons. The almost totality of those who go to jail come out of jail to go back to jail. The number of families or women who are not fit for purpose procreating children that will follow the trends of depravity and despair grows at a steady pace. Dysfunctionality comes to mind. And we justify such trend with the words 'Human Rights'. The words Human Rights are used for many things as a justification for depravity and all kinds of abuses. Societies in crisis? I wonder why.

 

The Lion's logic and the nature of war

 

The Lion's Logic and the nature of war

Adolf Hitler said that once war starts there are no civilians. This goes together with the Lion's Logic. 

Lion's have to fight with other Lions to assert their power and when they prevail the most probable outcome is that the cubs of the defeated Lion are killed.

My father explained the Lion's Logic to me in very simple terms. If you allow the children of your enemies to survive, they will be a constant danger to your own existence.

The reason the Jews, men, women and children, were sent to the camps for extermination is that Germany was following the Lion's Logic. You don't allow children to live to become a threat to your own existence. The fact that Zionism and Israel do exist proves that Adolf Hitler was right in this regard. If you allow any survivors then your own survival will be in doubt.

The logic of the Palestinian conflict between Palestinian and Jews is living proof that since the Lion's Logic is not being applied. As long as Palestinian children are left alive and as lond as Jewish children are left alive the conflict will go on and on and on. Extermination is the only sure solution.

In war there are no civilians. There are only friends and foes. All sides proved that there are no civilians. The thought when bombing British cities and when bombing German cities was pretty evident. There were no civilians. There were Britons and Germans and the idea was to kill as many as possible to prevail. The defeated don't make good material. The sick and the infirm don't make good material. The disabled don't make good material. The sexually dysfunctional - including those mentally sexually dysfunctional - must be exterminated to build a stronger nation. Violence exists for a very good reason.

Refugees are inferior people. People who refuse to stand up and fight.

https://www.facebook.com/nationalistforum

Blank attacks against all Russians and anything Russian will strenghten Russian determination and NATO will be seen as the 1941 Wehrmacht

For those of us who bother to learn about Russian history, the idea of launching an attack against all Russians and all things Russian will take the Russian Federation back to the 22th of June 1941, the start of Unternehmen Barbarossa when the strives towards the implementation of Adolf Hitler Plan to exterminate Russians and replace them with German farmers in Lebensraum begun.

Demolishing monuments used to remember those who fought against National Socialist Germany will return Europe back to World War Two. Those who forget the past are forced to relive the past. 

So what is the brilliant idea that the Baltic Republics and others got? Confiscate anything Russian. Why? To prevent any Russians from entering Europe. As soon as the news hit the headlines across the Russian Federation those who oppose national mobilization in the Russian Federation will support national mobilization and when this happens Europe as a whole will once again face the prospect of an all-out war.

NATO will be seen as the 1941 Wehrmacht.

https://www.meetup.com/london-online-chat-big-question-philosophy-group/events/296109310/

You are welcome to discuss about this and other issues following the link.

 

US Nuclear Weapons to be stationed once again in the United Kingdom

 United Kingdom will once again have US nuclear weapons stationed at a special facility being built

Apparently the monies being asked 'to help Ukraine' include monies to be invested in a site that will contain US nuclear weapons and this comes on top of other sites in other European countries, including Germany - to name the most important country in Europe.

It is part of a project that includes air, land and sea launching capabilities. With this, Britain becomes a legitimate target for a nuclear attack.

This is the map of what will happen to London if a single nuclear head hits London. It will take barely 15 minutes for a missile launched in Kaliningrad to reach London. Scarcely the time for any kind of evacuation. Much of London will be wiped out and what is not wiped out will be made uninhabitable due to high radiation levels.

Work is underway to bring US nuclear weapons to the United Kingdom and RAF Lakenheath is being mentioned as one of the locations - let us remember that Britain had US nuclear weapons before in several locations that included Lakenhead, Molesworth and Greenham Common.

It must be remembered that climate change matters as long as there is a living planet. Nuclear War in Europe will make such concerns about climate change totally redundant. As Adolf Hitler stated, armies are made for war. US has the clear intention of using nuclear weapons using Britain as a platform to launch nuclear weapons.

The arrival of such weapons in the United Kingdom will certainly be welcomed by those in the Russian Federation that favour the use of nuclear weapons. In fact, the arrival of such weapons in the United Kingdom could actually trigger nuclear war in a pre-emptive attack against the United Kingdom. 

Ukraine: promises sound good, but are they good?

Sitting in an office with the television set by my side watching the news, I suddenly was focused on a report coming from New York, USA, about the Twin Towers and airplanes crashing onto the sides of the towers and couldn't possibly imagine that just a few weeks later war was to arrive in Afghanistan, country that was to be subject to carpet bombing. The smoking mountains were on television screens across the world. Just about two years later came yet another disastrous event that was the invasion of Iraq that completely destabilized the Middle East causing wave after wave of refugees. There was Libya, Syria and so forth afterwards.

The present war in Ukraine has been going on for more than a year and there is every indication that it could go on and on, threatening to engulf Europe as a whole. I do remember the war in Yugoslavia, war that ended up with the end of Yugoslavia and that in more than one way led to expansion of NATO that created the present war in Ukraine.

Long before the present war, Ukraine was in trouble, unable to make ends meet, with internal upheaval and ethnic tensions. Western Ukraine did not love Eastern Ukraine very much and World War Two is ample evidence of it when one side of Ukraine supported National Socialist Germany and was very much involved in what we know as the Holocaust and Eastern Ukraine sided with the Allies. Paradoxically, history repeats itself following what happened in Yugoslavia. Croatia and Bosnia Herzegobina were on the side of National Socialist Germany. Heinrich Himmler used to boast about the fact that Muslims from Bosnia Herzegobina joined the SS and were 'good fighters'. It did not come as a surprise the fact that Germany was the first country to recognize an independent Croatia because, after all, Croatia was on the German side during World War Two.

What happens today in the Baltic Republics is no surprise either. SS officers remarked the cruelty of Lithuanians against Jews. They described the scenes of an execution carried out by Lithuanians against Jews. The Lithuanians killed Jewish men, women and children and after the execution they danced on top of the corpses playing accordions and singing.

One conflict after another seems to be waged against people who fought against National Socialist Germany. Yugoslavia was dismantled and all the focus was against Serbia that in two World Wars fought against Germany and Austria. Now the focus is against Eastern Ukraine and against the Russian Federation that as part of the then Soviet Union lost tens of millions of people fighting against National Socialist Germany.

But, going back to the title, how good are the promises and what is the real agenda? The real agenda is to weaken Europe and the USA is using the conflict in Ukraine to weaken Europe and threatening to destabilize Europe with the willing cooperation of European governments that seem all to eager to please warmongering lobbies with complete disregard for their own peoples. In their efforts, adulating politicians are getting rid of outdated equipment that even when it is outdated it will be difficult to replace. Denmark, Netherlands, Norway and others are not known for being military powers and even Germany that was kept under American domination is no military power at all. Warplanes are foreign made and bought from the shelf since Germany was not allowed to develop its war industries. The only pieces of equipment worth mentioning are the Leopard tanks and even so they have proven to be pretty useless in real combat.

Promises here and there and big speeches including speeches made by Ursula von der Leyen, the disastrous former German Defense Secretary and present head of the European Commission can only make a bad situation worse. Present German Chancellor Olaf Scholz talks both ways, sending equipment while expressing fears regarding the involvement of Germany in yet another war. 

Ukraine: I am starting to believe that USA wants Ukraine destroyed

 If anything we learn from the Battle of the Bulge in World War Two is that you should not send tanks into the battlefied without air cover, but this is exactly what the USA is making Ukrainians do and German Leopard tanks and American tanks are being hunted like fish in a barrel.

You also should know that rookies sent into the battlefield with the most advanced technology are still rookies and Ukrainian troops are being slaughered at the tune of 14,000 day, killed and injured and that cemeteries in Ukraine are bein 're-used', using old graves to bury dead combattants.

Is there a secret intention? We knew from various reports, that Bandera units were incorporated in the regular Ukrainian Armed Forces and Bandera units - declared anti-Semites and allies of Germany during World War Two. Is this a way of getting rid of Bandera units? Is the American government sending Bandera units to fight Russian forces knowing that they are going to be defeated by Russian forces.

And what about the turnout of the business? The more tanks are destroyed the more tanks are going to be needed, thus feeding American and German war industries. Never mind if in the process thousands upon thousands of Ukrainian lose their lives and livelihoods.

Gerhard Schröder: Burning links will only bring war in Europe a lot closer

Gerhard Schröder: Burning links will only bring war in Europe a lot closer

SPD has targetted its former leader and former German Chancellor for not wanting to join the movement towards war in Europe.

If German is destabilized by yet another war, the Fourth Reich will be born and those who now target Gerhard Schröder will be the ones that will fall the first when the debacle beings.

SPD is the head of a very weak coalition becaused SPD became head of a coalition without having won a significantly bigger number of votes. Olaf Scholz has a very hot potato in his hands. Industrialists and Workers joined forces 70 or so years ago and might join forces again when German manufacturing and the German economy in general falters. They will be asking for solutions that SPD will not be able to provide.

The National Socialist Workers' Party achieved what until then had become impossible because Liberals and Communists could not possible offer the economic solutions that were desperately needed. They offered the German version of the American New Deal. The present coalition cannot satisfy all sides and as the Greens keep putting pressure downwards with their ideological postulates about the environment, a German economy will once again face higher prices and unemployment of such levels that the political situation will become increasingly unstable leading to social unrest. As the CDU/CSU collapsed because it could not provide answers and as the SPD collapses, the direct alternative will be Alternative für Deutschland.

Lithuania and Polish Corridor Moment: Lithuania wants to be invaded

 

On September 1st, 1939, Germany invaded Poland. For several years, the issue had been the Polish Corridor created by the Versailles Treaty isolating Germany from a vast chunk of East Prussia including Danzig and Memel. 

Now, Lithuania might be about to make a tragic mistake by blocking access to Kaliningrad from the Russian mainland thus giving the Russian Federation a reason to take matters farther.

Cutting off rail links to Kaliningrad might be seen as a declaration of war, the ultimate provocation, that could signal the end of Lithuania as a country. Have Lithuanian leaders their heads in the right place? Provoking a powerful neighbour might not be the best action to undertake and especially when logistically any support is a world away if things go south and things might go south in a matter of days if not hours if the blockade is implemented and maintained.

They look the same, they think along the same lines, and they will be living next to you

Profile: Who are Ukraine's far-right Azov regiment

Azov is a far right infantry military group, ultra-nationalists with a white supremacist ideology. They have officially integrated into the National Guard of Ukraine. They carried out attacks against minority groups and its leader Andriy Biletsky said that he is leading the white races of the world against Semite-led Untermenschen (inferior races).

They wear symbols as Swastikas and SS regalia both as part of their uniforms and as tatoos. One of those symbols is the Wolfangel symbol which resembles a black Swastika on a yellow background. Groups carried out pogroms against the Roma community and attacked members of the LGBTQ community.

These are the people the so-called West is supporting. They are sworn anti-Semites.

These are the kind of people that will be coming to the EU and also to Britain. And they share the same ideology of other white supremacist groups that were very active in the United Kingdom.

NATO: Too big to fail?

 

With Turkey as NATO member, there were times when the contradictions within the alliance became all too obvious. Members of the said alliance are still opposed to Turkey's membership of the European Uniion on many grounds. 

Today, we face the fact that agendas within European country members of the alliance do not necessarily coincide on many grounds.

Many say that NATO and the European Union were created to prevent Germany from ever getting involved in another military adventure. This gives the idea that Germany is kept hostage within both NATO and the European Union.

Recent events in Eastern Europe are putting the alliance to the test. Croatia would leave the alliance if there is conflict with the Russian Federation. Germany has publicly stated that the country will not send troops nor military resources and has refused to withdraw its diplomatic representation as 'this would make the situation much worse'. 

Germany is the one country that has more to lose if there is a European war. Germany has been a net exporter and is the most powerful economy in Europe. As the most powerful economy, Germany needs energy and oil and gas supplies coming from the East are vital for the German economy. Non only that. Much of its manufactured products are sold in the East. A conflict with the Russian Federation or with China or with both would be catastrophic for the German economy.

Those in the USA who are promoting a war in Europe do it because they believe that it will forward American interests and do so without a care in the world because they believe that in this way they can keep Europe as a hostage of American interests. Nord Stream 2 comes to mind. If Germany - and by extension Europe - cannot get supplies from Middle East or Latin America, then the USA can apply monopolistic price fixing. Therefore, a war with the Russian Federation does not benefit European economies. Quite the opposite. 

The First World War did not benefit Europe. The Second World War did not benefit Europe. USA got richer and more powerful thanks to European wars and this is why the USA is promoting yet another war in Europe. A new European war can completely distroy Europe and cause catastrophic political changes and cause more loss of life than the First World War and World War Two put together. And, most importantly, war in Europe will destroy the Organisation of the United Nations in the very same way that war in Europe destroyed the League of Nations, but this times with even more catastrophic consequences for the world as a whole.

Britain's impending depression: Mass media focus on witch-hunt instead

Britain impending depression: Mass media focus on witch-hunt instead

Emily Maitlis heading a witch-hunt

At the time when mass media and politicians should be focusing on what is going to happen when the Lockdown is finally lifted, the emphasis is on a witch-hunt.

When unemployment is bound to reach more than 10 million in the United Kingdom alone, time is awfully wasted in point scoring, the kind of exercise in which the whole country loses.

If Parliament is incapble of dealing with the real issues, why do we need a Parliament at all? The amount of borrowing continues to escalate and when the furlough scheme is finally over, Britain will be facing a crisis that will be an absolute catastrophe. But the so called Free Press that is neither Free nor real Press doesn't give a damn about millions of British families that will be literally left without a roof and without money to put food on the dining tables.

When you have no savings and no monies coming your way, you cannot afford to pay your mortage, your loans and credit cards and this means a default of gigantic proportions, much bigger than any financial crisis we have ever faced before. Neither of the financial insitutions will be able to survive such a crisis. We risk being swallowed by mountain of debt and defaulted loans and mortages.

Unfortunaly, we have got party political operators like Emily Maitlis using and abusing the BBC as a platform to promote her own agenda, whatever credibility the BBC has left after years of partiality and political meddling.

If because of a financial crisis without precedent in the United Kingdom the political scene becomes extremely polarized, the Weimar Republic will be seen as Paradise on Earth. The truth no longer matters. All that matters is innuendo, distortion, lies, deceit, demonization and gossip. I suggest that we rename so call Mass Media. From now on, they should be known as SGI (Scandals Gossiping Industry).  

Labour Councillor suspended accused of having called Adolf Hittler the greatest man in history

Labour Councillor suspended accused of having called Adolf Hittler the greatest man in history

The Nazi Milkshakes and others relevant issues

The Nazi Milkshakes and others relevant issues

When we accept or promote degrading acts against those we don't agree with we are promoting exactly what we say that we reject. We must respect all candidates and their supporters, we must have open debate without exclusions.

Britain is quickly becoming the new Weimar Republic because of lack of trust and widespread intolerance.

We have a responsibility to avoid excesses that could lead to tragedies.

This no longer about throwing milkshakes but the act of throwing things at people will produce an escalation of events. Lack of respect, physical aggression and ultimately death.

Adolf Hitler: If you can take it and keep it, it is yours

Adolf Hitler: If you can take it and keep it, it is yours

The words of Adolf Hitler taken from Mein Kampf reflect the reality of Israeli politics supported by the United of America,

While the United States of America has publicly stood against territorial acquisition by others in the past, the United States of America was based on Adolf Hitler's idea that you could take somebody else's land and make it yours. Based on the Doctrine of Predestination, starting with the thirteen colonies that were the original foundation of the USA via following wars against Spain and against Mexico, the United States of America took land by force and made it part of the United States of America. There were failed attempt like the Walker's Adventure in Mexico where the USA flag was planted for a brief time before the attempt turned to absolute failure but the intention has always existed to continue such expansion by force.

When territorial acquisition by force is not a feasible option, comes colonisation using the economy as a tool for territorial domination. Israeli occupation and annexation obviously follows Adolf Hitler's doctrine. Building settlements in occupied territories is nothing new. Do you remember Sudetenland and the München Pakt of 1938? If you increase your population in occupied territories you can then claim that the land is yours and you can take with little opposition. This is what is actually happened in what is known as the West Bank. So there is little new there. If you can take it and keep it, it is yours. 

The approach towards Syria is very much part of the said approach by weakening any opposition of Israeli expansionist campaign based not just in political and financial convenience but also on religious ideas. The whole concept of the people of Israel being the chosen people by God is nothing more than the Aryan Doctrine of power and control of the Third Reich. Recent legislation passed by the Israeli Knesset is exactly the affirmation of Jewish superiority over the Arab population of Israel that states the Jews are the Master Race and Arabs are there only to serve the Master Race.

In the meantime, any criticism of the policies of repression, occupation, annexation and colonisation is classified as Anti-Semitism. 

National Action: The Truth will shock you

NATIONAL ACTION: THE TRUTH WILL SHOCK YOU

In the early days, Jack Renshaw was like any other guy of his age. He had a healthy interest in politics and he had a career to show for it. He like many others joined the so called Far Right because he believed in the Nationalist spirit. He like many others was feeling increasingly angry against the so called political establishment that he and others saw as giving preference to outsiders in spite of very pressing needs of Britons that were not being met. What he heard from speakers like Richard Edmonds from National Front and others convinced him that he was on the right path. At the time, what was defined as British Nationalism was very much linked to Racial Politics and World World Two. There was nothing about violence but there were very well defined boundaries in terms of political activism, of the notion of us and the others. The preferred way was political and everything was about winning elections.

Jack Renshaw was made by Hope Not Hate, the UAF, the BBC and also by the Labour Party and its para-political branches. Everywhere the British National Party went, its supporters were called Nazi, Fascist and Racist to the point that instead of being offended by such labelling many got to the conclusion that whatever they did they would still be called Nazi, Fascist and Racist. Things got to a point when the stereotype created by those who were against the British National Party created a public image that attracted individuals that admired the Dritte Reich and its policies. 

British Security Services infiltrated the British National Party pretending to be genuine supporters and acted as agent provocateurs promoting loose talk. British Security agents went around inciting people to talk about the Dritte Reich, Adolf Hitler and making salutes while pretending to be British National Party Members. The Police had no interest in protecting the public. All they wanted was to compromise the British National Party for political reasons reinforcing existing stereotypes. 

British Security Services have for a very long time being involved in criminal activities and in this case it was about criminal activities with a political purpose. We tracked down British agents when they were not pretending to be political activists i.e. some of them were working at the Home Office in Croydon when the Croydon Branch of the British National Party was rising.

British agents had no limits. They identified vulnerable people - including those with health issues - and used them to spy on the British National Party and to create internal dissent. This combined with internal differences were the seeds of what happened years later despite big electoral successes.

The planned agenda was to bring down the British National Party and attacking individuals was a way to do it. If you were a British National Party member you were banned from certain jobs in the state sector. Much more than that, if you were a known member of the British National Party you would not be employed or you would lose your job also in the private sector. This continues to apply even when the British National Party is not even one per cent of what it used to be in terms of political success. This form of political discrimination that seriously undermined personal lives and family lives contributed to create the feeling of being hunted and pushed many over the top making them believe that this is was not just political. It became a fight for survival and in a fight for survival you kill or you are killed. It is an issue of Us or They.

Extremism has been promoted by political parties, para-political organisations like Hope Not Hate and the UAF, the mass media and the Security Services. People were becoming disenfranchised not just from politics but also from society as a whole that they saw as the enemy that had to be eliminated.

People like Jack Renshaw went from being healthy youngsters with political ambitions to being people frustrated and angry that no longer saw the point of trying to engage in the democratic process. The idea was then 'they hate us, they are ruining our lives, let's stand up and fight.'

Discrimination, persecution, harassment and bans will promote extremism. When people feel that they are being hunted, for a while they will withdraw and when they feel that there is nowhere to go they will turn around and kill.

We need open debate but not just debate. We need plural debate. We must not push people underground to the point that they no longer believe in democracy and fairness. When people become disenfranchised, they will be dangerous. If they are isolated from the rest of society, they will see society as the enemy.