Germany, once again, will have the strongest Armed Forces in Europe

 

As new plans are being drawn, the Federal Republic of Germany will have once again the strongest Armed Forces in Europe.

It has become self-evident that Pax Americana will be replaced with Pax Deutschland. Germany as the strongest and wealthier country in Europe, will be in charge of European security and economics.

German superiority will be ascertained once again. Germany is taking significant stepts to overhaul its military. Chancellor Friedrich Merz has pledged to build Europe´s strongest army. An ambitious goal for a country that has long dealt with underfunding and neglect. Conscription is the key towards German rearmament. The aim is to vastly increase manpower of the German Armed Forces. The initial plan is to have more than 500,000 troops ready for combat. Mandatory enlistment is on the cards. All men of 18 years of age will be obliged to complete forms for military service. Men of military age will be also obliged to be subjected to regular health check ups showing that they are fit to go to war.

At this point in time, World War Two is very much in the mind of the German Peoples. They are willing to fight for Germany, but they are not willing to fight for NATO. Deutschland, Deutschland über alles. They are willing to defend Germany, but they are not willing to fight somebody else´s wars.

The question that arises is how long will it take for Germany to become, once again, the strongest military force in Europe. Present estimates indicate that this will not happen before 2030. Having said that, the present politicial status quo is by no means guaranted. A different government with different agendas might make it happen long before 2030. An European Union controlled by Germany is very much a possibility. Without firing a single shot, Germany could achieved what Adof Hitler did not achieve in the 1930s and 1940s. 

In fact, Adolf Hitler predicted that a strongest Germany would rise when the then powers USA and Soviet Union confronted each other. The Soviet Union is no more since 1991, but the reasoning is very much the same. The German people that were bombarded with messages of guilt for so long might now restore militaristic thinking across Germany and German military traditions will be equally restored.

 

The Third Reich (Das Dritte Reich) was never defeated

For decades, we have been told a story and people all over the world have been celebrating the victory over Das Dritte Reich. We have been shown the images of a ravaged Germany, of concentration camps, everthing that fits in in the narrative that tells the world about the catastrophic end at the end of World War Two.

How much of that has been a charade, a way to ignore what actually happened? As always, you must follow the monies. Britain is constantly reminded about the Blitz, when British cities were showered with V1 and V2 bombs. You are shown the images of burning buildings and are told about the thousands of victims of the Blitz. Ordinary people, understandably, get very emotional about it. But, just a few years later, decisions were made that made a mockery of the suffering of those who were burnt live or suffocated or well kill by debris and of those who had to lament their passing.

So lets talk about history. When were the flying bombs known as V1 and V2 used against Britain? Well, here is the answer: The V1 bombs were used from June 13, 1944 until March 29 1945. The V2 were used from September 1944 until March 27 1945.

What happened to the German team that designed the bombs? Well, Wernher von Braun and his team went to work in the USA, became American citizens (all of them or some of them) and helped advance American technology and helped the USA start its Space Project.

In fact, the war was still ongoing when special teams were tasked to find German scientists, to rewrite their biographies (to make them respectable and to delete any bit of data that could become an embarrassment). 

The real history of World War Two might never be written to replace the fake history being taught around the world. Americans, British, French and Russians will want to maintain the belief that Adolf Hitler actually died in a bunker in Berlin. 

Such a belief is very much part of the narrative that has been repeated over and over again. So they will tell that those called Nazis are the bad guys, but they will be pretty embarrassed to accept that most of the surviving bad guys helped promote American interests around the world. Even more, one of Adolf Hitler´s personal bodyguards went to work in Argentina protecting Juan Domingo Peron and Eva Peron and when Juan Domingo Peron was deposed in a coup then Otto Johann Anton Skorzeny was employed by Israeli security services. Incidentally, Otto Johann Anton Skorzeny, a Waffen SS Officer was the man that rescued Benito Mussolini.

They do not want you to know that U Boots loaded with gold and other precious metals, diamonds, money and people were arriving in Argentina all the way up to the time when Juan Domingo Peron was deposed in a coup lead by the Argentinian Navy. They do not want you to know either that The Vatican and the Red Cross facilitaded free passage to Latin America for SS officers. A change of name and/or a change of "nationality" and there you were, travelling free and without any worries, ready to start a new life in countries like Argentina, Urugua, Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia, Chile and elsewhere.

And the following is a story, especially prepared for you. 

This is a copy of the Uruguayan marriage certificate of Josef Mengele. Josef Mengele, who originally travelled to Argentina where he prospered as a businessman, married the widow of his brother in the Province of Colonia, in Uruguay, using his real name. Here is your homework. Find out who Josef Mengele was. 

His presence was known by Britain, USA, and other countries and they knew full well the role he played during World War Two and never bothered him. Josef Mengele died at the beach in Brazil due to heart problems. With full knowledge of Western German authorities he travelled to Germany after World and later returned to Latin America. His movements could not be more public.

I was about 21 years old when Josef Mengele died at a beach in Brazil, on February 7th 1979. My father was a pilot and he often travelled alone to Brazil, but he always kept his movements secret. Shall I add that among my first toys there was a Stuka Dive Bomber that my father gave me. My father knew chemical formulae by heart and had the then typical Deutsche Punktlichkeit. He used to make people laugh when it was found that other people used to check their watches when my father arrived to see if their watches were on time. My father was for a time President of the two main social clubs of the town, clubs that did not welcome non whites. During a storm with very strong winds the ceiling of a neighbour´s house that happened to be Jewish was blown away. My mother often referred to my father´s reaction when that happened: "He was standing on the streets, laughing, applauding and celebrating his neigbour´s misfortune".

But the story goes on and it becomes more interesting. In June 1973, there was a military coup in Uruguay, followed by a military coup in Chile in September 1973. Days before the coup in Chile, my father and I attended a meeting of military officers in Uruguay. My father had a very good relationship with the military. At that meeting, it was announced that a military coup was going to happen in Chile.

And the story becomes ever more interesting. We come to Track II, a CIA operation organised to depose President Salvador Allende and Henry Kissinger had active participation in it, involving in it SS and Gestapo Officers in Latin America in what later known as Operacion Condor. Henry Kissinger was obsessed with Chile and had even tried to prevent Salvador Allende from becoming Chilean President. Having failed to prevent Salvador Allende from becoming Chilean President, he decided to kill President Allende. But things did not stop. They went on. As part of the US called the South Atlantic Strategic Defensive Triangle, the USA - under Henry Kissinger direction - allowed the use of any means possible, including assassination and torture to carry out an ideological war. The USA trained military officers of the military regimes in Latin America to fight against, capture, torture, rape and kill ten of thousands of people. CIA officers were sent to Latin America to assist with "interrogation techniques". In Argentina, more than 30,000 were killed and many of them were thrown from airplaes flying at high altitude, drugged after being tortured. It is presumed that they died during the fall, death provoked by air pressure, before their bodies collided with the surface of the sea that for those falling from high altitude had the consistency of hard rock. We can go to Chile, Paraguay, Bolivia and other countries where similar accounts can be found. Bolivia is a particularly interesting chapter since the Butcher of Lyon, Klaus Barbie, was employed by the USA. But there were other significative places like Colonia Dignidad in Chile. Do you know who Klaus Barbie was? Do your homework.

Now, lets rewind a little. By 1942, it became evident that Unternehmen Barbarossa was not going well. German forces were not in good shape when the first Russian Winter arrived. The chain of supplies was much too thin and the Luftwaffe having lost much of its capacity in the West was not capable of providing German forces in the Eastern Front what German forces needed. German forces had tried unsuccessfully to capture Stalingrad. First, the city was bombed and left in ruins. This itself made the German advance more difficult as the ruins of the city became its defenders´ major asset. (July 17 1942 - February 2, 1943)

General Paulus army were increasingle isolated and surrounded be enemies that sooner than later managed to totally encircle his army. By then it was obvious that Germany did not have what it took to take the city, let alone the Soviet Union. So concerned capitalists and industrialists in Germany were justifiably worried about what would happen to their assets if Germany lost the war. A high ranking meeting was called to talk about what could be done to protect German assets. The assets were not lost even when Germany was said to have been defeated. Moreover, the Americans used the Gold they captured in what is known as the Marshall Plan. Soonafter the war, Germany prospered as German capitals that had remained hidden started to flow again, legally, in Germany and elsewhere.

So lets rewind a bit more. When he realised that the war was lost, Adolf Hitler prophesized that there would be a new Germany, a stronger Germany, after a confrontation between the USA and the Soviet Union (now Russian Federation, after the fall of the Soviet Union).

Now, lets see what is happening now. Relatively recent events in Europe are promoting German Rearmament (No Versailles Treaty on the horizon). Friedrich Merz was seen gloating and boasting about "the German Armed Forces will be the biggest in Europe". Compared to other countries, Germany is relatively stronger both economically and militarily. Germany no longer needs to justify its military strength as other countries are extremely happy to promote German rearmament "for the common good". And significative events are happening all the time. Now, a force of 4500 troops, part of Panzer Group, will be stationed in Lithuania. Never mind the numbers. The importance of such deployment is that it leaves behind postwar military and political limitations regarding the deployment of German fighting forces outside Germany. Moreover, the conflict in Ukraine has allowed German industry to test the efficacity of German weapons. Ukraine, like Spain before Ukraine (The Spanish Civil War) provides valuable knowledge about how effective German weapons are. Until now, German weapons were in the hands of Ukrainians. From now on, German weapons will be in the hands of German troops that will be especially trained to use them.

And who stands to benefit from German rearmament? Well, geopolitical changes will lead to Germany producing its own weapons, instead of importing them from somewhere else i.e USA. While other European countries will still be buying weapons "off the shelves", Germany will empower its own defense industries. Something that might not be ignored is the possibility that American forces will leave Germany and that Germany will have total control of any forces in its territory.

So, coming back to the beginning, the idea that Germany was totally defeated during World War Two contrasts with the fact that there was a continuity that is becoming ever more apparent. World War Two was just a battle. 

 

 

 

If Hitler had won World War Two, there would be no Israel

All Jews should put aside all ideological considerations and use their brains and they would come to the natural conclusion that if Hitler had won World War Two by defeating the Soviet Union, then there would have been no Israel. Right up to the point in 1948 when Israel was born, Palestine had been a British Protectorate. If Britain had lost the war, then Palestine would have become a German Territory. As it happened during World War One, the losers in the war lost most of their colonial territories. It happened to Germany after World War One and it would have happened to Britain and France during World War Two. So vast chuncks of the Middle, Africa and Asia would have come under German Rule and the Japanese would taken over the rest, including vast expanses of China.

Soviet Forces liberated Concentration Camps with the British and the Americans coming in as spectators once Concentration Camps had been taken over by Soviet Troops. The famous Balfour Declaration would have meant absolutely nothing and instead of migrating to Palestine, hundreds of thousands would have ended their lives in concentration camps or worse.

Whatever you might think in ideological terms, facts are facts. I wonder also what would have happened if Unternehmen Barbarossa had never happened. Entire German Divisions would with Panzer would have been available at Normandy. The Normandy Invasion would have ended with tends of thousands of American Troops, British Troops and troops of other nationalities falling prisoners of the German Wehrmacht. It must be remembered that many Europeans of countries occupied by Germany were pro-German and went on to fight for Germany. So nothing was clear cut.

When talking about history, we must put ideology aside and look at the historical facts of what happened on the battlefields.

Looking at the history of Japan and at events leading to the attack in Pearl Harbour, Admiral Yamamoto was totally against the Axis. He thought that signed a deal with Germany was against Japanese best interests. In the end, the Axe was against Germany itself. If the Axis had not existed, then the Americans would have been at war in the Pacific but would not have been at war in Europe, Africa or Middle East. President Roovevelt used Pearl Harbour as justification to spread the war. Germany made a significant mistake when it declared war against the USA.

Looking at present conflicts, it must be remembered that World War Two (or World War One, for that matter) did not happen all at once. There was a series of conflicts that started long before September 1939. Japanese expansion in Asia started long before World War Two. There was also the Spanish Civil War to consider. Each conflict became a step towards the conflict that we know as World War Two.

 2025: A Dramatic First Quarter of a Century

From now on, the process of change will accelerate and will become ever more a chain reaction that will lead to World War. And maybe World War is absolutely necessary to change the rotten status quo that has dominated the West. 

Fundamental changes, throughout history, did not happen peacefully. There are quite a few examples. The American Revolution, the Revolution Francaise, the Revolutions that led to the formation of the Soviet Union, and many other violent events.

The West has been enslaved by corruption politicians that will have to be removed and until that happens the West will continue a downwards spiral towards total decadence has led to lower birth rates and colonisation. Western countries are no longer recognizable as Western countries and the barbarity and decadence of the Developing World has flooded the Developed World turning the Developed World into a nightmare.

The longer the conflict lasts, the greater the danger of nuclear war

 

The longer the conflict lasts, the greater the chances of the unthinkable happening. In 1945, President Truman decided to use atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to shorten the war and prevent a rising number of American casualties should American forces have to fight on Japanese soil where stiff resistance was expected. It was also a political statement for the then Soviet Union and to prevent a Soviet attack against Japan.

In 2022, the presence of nuclear devices is supposed to be a deterrent,but there is always a 'what if...' scenario in which the parties might decide to use nuclear devices. In 2020, NATO carried out military exercises 'to prepare for nuclear war'. If you prepare for something, you anticipate that it might come the time when it will actually happen. If it were to happen, it would open a whole series of new possibilities. One thing is combat with conventional forces and quite another is a scenario in which weapons that are much power powerful than the atomic devices used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki are detonated in Europe and elsewhere. What would trigger the use of nuclear devices? Would there be a preemptive attack? Who will make the first move? If there is an attack going one way, it is going to be immediately followed by an attack going in the opposite way.

If we can imagine the commotion created by the bombs thrown in Japan decades ago, it is not difficult to foresee the commotion today if nuclear bombs were to fall destroying capital cities. In order to understand what would be the prevailing mentality, we need to remember what happened in World War Two. If any of the parties had had such bombs earlier during the conflict would they have hesitated? If instead of sending bombing crews one after another to be shot down, if instead of sending U-boots to be sunk, the parties had had nuclear bombs to wipe out any armed resistance, to destroy every industrial capability, in one go, what would they have done?

Think about D-Day. If the allies had had the choice of using nuclear bombs instead of sending hundreds of thousands of men across the sea, many of whom lost their lives before reaching France, would they have they used nuclear bombs instead? If instead of loading V1s and V2s with conventional explosives Germany had had nuclear devices to put an end to the war in one go, would Germany have used nuclear bombs instead of conventional forces? The reason heavy water installations were bombed by the allies was that they did not want Germany to develop atomic devices. If Germany had had atomic bombs, would the Soviets have reached Germany? 

Now, coming back to today's realities. If there is the scenario in which it is foreseen that millions of troops would lose their lives in combat, would any of the parties choose to use nuclear weapons instead of suffering heavy casualties at the front? Why does Israel have nuclear devices? Why do Pakistan and India have nuclear devices? Why does Britain have nuclear devices? Why does anybody want to have nuclear devices? The reason is pretty obvious. 

What is the danger of economic sanctions? What was the danger of the American oil embargo against Japan before Japan attacked Pearl Harbour? If you push a country towards the wall, somebody might decide that if there are no economic benefits then war is a preferred option. Japan was becoming an industrial power in Asia and needed oil. This is why Japan decided to attack Pearl Harbour, to attack the one country that had limited Japan's chances to achieve economic development. The economy was the core issue that led Japan to attack the USA. 

President Putin's immediate reaction to the mention of further economic measures was to put the Armed Forces on alert. If the so called West is genuine, if the USA is genuine, in terms of favouring a peaceful outcome to put an end to the conflict, putting up pressure is not the right answer. If it is believed that the only way forward is nuclear war, the entire world loses.

Alison Chabloz: On Inquisition, learning and Social Change

Alison Chabloz: On Inquisition, learning and Social Change

If we to continue talking about what is offensive, grossly offensive and extremely offensive, Humanity would be stuck in the Stone Age for every time there has been a leap into the future we have to deal with those who feel offended by evolution.

As a Catholic, I reject the Catholic Church as a political, often repressive and hierarchical institution that in many respects has been guilty of the worst atrocities in human history. The Earth is not the centre of the Universe despite the fact that Galileo Galilei was arrested and forced to explain himself in front of an Inquisition. 

We would be living with the unnecessary threat of deadly illnesses and still believing that bleeding a human being is the way to get rid of the said illnesses if people had not gone out of the way and risked their lives to dissect human corpses to get to know about the human body and the bodily functions of the human body. 

We cannot know the full truth about conflicts happening in our time but there are those who issue laws and promote fear to prevent people from inquiring and researching to get a better picture of what really happened and what is really happening. For many years, the German Wehrmacht was blamed for the execution of Polish officers. It was easy to blame Germany for it because after all Germany had been defeated in war and the Soviet Union was the winning partner although the partnership soon came to an end with the beginning of the Cold War. The Polish soldiers had actually being executed by Soviet Soldiers following Stalin's orders, the same Stalin that decimated by the Soviet Army by executing practically all high ranking officers of the Soviet Army to the point that the Soviets faced catastrophic defeats both when fighting Finland and Japan.

There isn't one version of history. In fact, there is one version of every conflict for every individual involved or affected by it and not even the most capable historian would be physically capable of understanding and knowing the full extent of a single conflict, let alone the complexity of  what we know as World War Two. The number of those who perished is absolutely irrelevant and in any case nobody can honestly say that he or she knows exactly how many died, how the died and in some cases not even where they died because they just vanished in the widespread mess of war.

To accuse Alison Chabloz of being a Holocaust Denier is an insult. She doesn't deny that Jews and others were persecuted. She expressly stated in court and outside the courtroom that she never denied that persecution and killings happened. She questions the means and the numbers and there is a living human being who could state without a shadow of a doubt that he or she knows how, where and how many people lost their lives but, once again, Intolerance and Stupidity get on the way - sometimes in a very threatening and forceful manner on the way of those who want to get a better picture of what really happened.

If as Humanity we are stuck with myths and half-truths, we are going to be deprived of a fundamental freedom that it is the freedom to find the truth and the freedom to evolve. Socrates didn't go to his death for nothing. He chose to drank poison and die because he was dying for a fundamental principle. Socrates stated: Say something and I will prove that you are wrong. Say the opposite and I will prove that you are wrong. But some of those who say that they admire Socrates are the first ones to pass laws to prevent individuals from questioning official versions of events. Another great philosopher - Descartes - said "I think, therefore I exist". We exist because of the capacity to think and our thinking must not be dictated by intolerant idiots that want to force us to accept myths and mythology.

Arms Lobby doesn't like peace between US and Russia

Arms Lobby doesn't like peace between US and Russia

Any signs of joviality and closeness between US and Russia is something that the Arms Lobby and those who benefit from rivalry and wars don't like.

But Senator Schumer, one of President Trump's staunchest critics doesn't practice what he preaches. He is angry because President Trump is being friendly with Russia and because his party lost a Presidential Election having chosen the wrong candidate - a woman with self-evident physical and mental problems that will go on blaming others but not so much herself for her own defeat. The Russians did this, the Russians did that. No mention whatsoever of cheating within the Democratic Party against another Democratic candidate - Bernie Sanders. Senator Sanders was robbed by the very same people who now ran around shouting about foul play.

Hillary Clinton didn't wipe out her emails for fear of being hacked. She wiped out her emails before they could fall into the hands of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. CNN (Clinton News Network) and other mass media and the war machine of Hollywood became a gigantic propaganda machine targeting Donald Trump as aspiring Presidential Candidate, as Presidential Candidate and now as President of the United States of America.

Does anybody want to push the Nuclear Button? If we don't want somebody to push the Nuclear Button we must choose dialogue instead of confrontation. Organised and premeditated hostility towards the Russian Federation will not bring Peace but War.

NATO forces massing along the borders of the Russian Federation are a reminder of what happened on June 22 1941 - Unternehmen Barbarossa. As Adolf Hitler said, armies are made for war. Massing troops along the borders of another country is not a sign of the will for peace but of the determination to go to war. On June 22, 1941, National Socialist Germany under the leadership of Adolf Hitler invaded the Soviet Union and the rest is history.

Some people in the higher echelons of power of the United States of America want Nuclear War and Senator Charles Schumer could be one of them and so could be Senator John McCain - two warmongers - one on the Democratic side and another on the Republican side.

Both Senator Schumer and Senator McCain are members of the pro-war campaign. They don't want friendship and cooperation between two key countries in the Security Council of the Organisation of the United Nations.

1962 - 2016 USA then and now. Russian Federation faces American Empire

In 1962, the world could have witnessed nuclear war when US threatened the then Soviet Union with war because of missiles in Cuba.

Today, after a gigantic amount of patience, the Russian Federation tells warmonger US to stop provoking the Russian Federation by installing missiles in Poland and in Romania, just across the borders of the Russian Federation.

The United States of America, after destabilizing Asia Minor, Middle East and Africa, is actively engaged destabilizing Europe and using the EU in a war by proxy against the Russian Federation.

The refugee crisis that engulfs Europe was created by illegal wars and US military interventions across the world. The USA has trillions of Dollars of debt that it cannot pay and does not want to pay and still spends more in the business of war than all the rest of the world put together. So what is the American recipe? Purely and simply, printing currency and getting deeper and deeper into debt while the rest of the world is told to live within its means and this is exactly the kind of status quo that the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund controlled by the USA have promoted.

The USA talks about Human Rights. Well, When people talk about US Foreign Policies the said policies don't seem to have any regard for Human Rights. Just a few days ago, people were remembering Operation Condor, a strategic plan developed by the USA and implemented by Latin American dictatorships that the USA fully supported. In Argentina alone more than 30,000 people were 'disappeared' with total knowledge of the USA and total support from the USA.

Tens of thousands were tortured and killed by Police Forces and Armies trained by the USA who sent special 'instructors and advisers on interrogation methods'. One such adviser was Dan Mitrione who arrived in Uruguay when the country was still under a democratic government. Dan Mitrione was captured and killed by guerrillas in Uruguay but there were many others because as a CIA link he specialized on torture methods applied to political detainees.

A few days before the coup d'état in Chile in September 1973, my father and I attended a meeting of officers of the Uruguayan Air Force. At the meeting, the coup d'état that was going to happen against President Salvador Allende in Chile was mentioned. The Uruguayan Army had taken control of Uruguay in June 1973 with the auspices of the US State Department. So, it was business as usual and very much an integral part of US Foreign Policy.

Old habits die hard and USA is playing with millions of lives for the sake of implementing its warmongering agenda.