Peter Rushton and the Mole Thing

Peter Rushton and the Mole Thing

Peter Rushton: Fervent Nationalist or Long Standing Mole

Peter Rushton has usually presented himself as a fervent Nationalist and Holocaust Revisionist but suspicions have existed about his true calling and especially after an investigation was launched quite a few years ago in the days when Nicholas Griffin was a prominent figure in the British National Party.

He was often around following Nationalist personalities that included Jez Turner and Alison Chabloz and was present during court trials. 

Suffice to say that Sonia Gable - wife of Gerry Gable - was also a fervent Nationalist until she was found out as having gone to bed with the then National Front with the sole purpose of being close to the leadership to then reveal to others the inner thinking of  National Front with a view to sabotage the organisation. Much of the process of fragmentation of National Front was instigated by individuals like Sonia Gable that was happy to use her body to extract information.

John Tyndall - Former NF Leader and former BNP Leader

For a Jewess like Sonia Gable, joining National Front and engaging in forbidden relationships with National Front members and its Leadership was yet another example of the end justifies the means. To put it mildly, work didn't have to be a burden. It could be pleasurable and she got a lot of pleasure out of it.

There is a saying about "hiding in plain view is the best way to hide". Peter Rushton has been involved for some time with a publication called "Heritage and Destiny" that is one of the main sources of information for organisations like Searchlight and Hope Not Hate. If you needed a way to demonise anybody standing - in more than one way - Heritage and Destiny is heaven on earth because it provides everything Searchlight and Hope Not Hate might want in order to create and maintain stereotypes and Mr Peter Rushton is very much in charge of Heritage and Destiny. 

After following Alison Chabloz for some time, Peter Rushton and other individuals linked with Heritage and Destiny turned against Alison Chabloz because she dared to use her legal rights to appeal in the courts a sentence that she saw as unfair. Richard Edmonds - former NF, former BNP and presently member of NF under the leadership of Tony Martin is very much linked to Peter Rushton and closed ranks with him and others to attack Alison Chabloz. You would say that with friends like these  you don't need enemies. But then again, have they been friends or merely tools for others who have done their best (or their worst - depends on how you see it) to destroy the Nationalist Movement? 

Soon after this picture was taken near the Cenotaph in Central London (Richard Edmonds, Alison Chabloz and Tony Martin (present leader of National Front) appear on the right of the image)) - Richard Edmonds, Peter Rushton and Michele Renouf launched a series of ongoing visceral attacks against Alison Chabloz that organisations like Hope Not Hate have used to their delight. If the CAA didn't manage to destroy Alison Chabloz, Heritage and Destiny has been there to finish the job started by CAA. This fuels rumours that Heritage and Destiny is nothing more than a branch of Searchlight/Hope Not Hate and that "a well known male Nationalist that has been in fact a Mole for more than 25 years" is de-facto linked to Heritage and Destiny. Without mentioning names, the choices of who could be such Mole are self-evident given the aforementioned.

  

 

 

 

2008: BNP seen as Anti-Semitic - 2019: Labour seen as Anti-Semitic

2008 - Anti-Semites?

2019 - Anti-Semites?

How times change! In 2008, Hope Not Hate (aka Hate Not Hope) and UAF (United Against Freedom) and other political and para-political organisations were shocked by the news that Richard Barnbrook (former Labourt Party member) had won a seat at the London Assembly. Oh God! The Nazis, the Fascists, the Racists, the Anti-Semites have entered the London Assembly. The BBC, Sky News and others called about the shocking rise of the Far Right, although no-one seemed to have paid attention to the fact that the Far Right had a very similar platform to the Labour platform including nationalisation of public services including public transport and shared the views of many Labour Party grassroots - the old working class - that expressed their discontent because the Labour Party was moving farther and farther away from the interests of working men and women and favouring a Globalist Agenda that supported Multinationals.

Some ten years later, the heat is turning towards the Far Left but the arguments are exactly the same. Listening to Luciana Berger and others explaining that they left the Labour Party because the Labour Party is Racist and Anti-Semitic shows that the Labour Party seems to be the new British National Party in the minds of many politicians and mass media, including those like Amber Rudd that used racist vocabulary even when she is desperately trying to show that she is not Racist. The "Coloured Lady" is not "Coloured". She is a British citizen of African descent. But the former Home Secretary who is back in the cabinet who knows for how long doesn't seem to get things right. She seems to have created a new political label. Amber Rudd is not Far Left nor Far Right. Amber Rudd is Far Wrong.

Interestingly enough, the CAA and Mr Falter are proving what they so vigorously deny both in their statements via the mass media and in the courtrooms. They are showing the massive influence of Zionist Lobbies in the United Kingdom and playing a political game. Why they target Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party? Because under its new Leadership the Labour Party is strongly denouncing the atrocities and abuses committed by the government of Benjamin Netanyahu with its policies of occupation, oppression, annexation and aggression in the Middle East. When you see Orthodox Jews being attacked on the streets of Israel by Jewish servicemen that follow orders of Benjamin Netanyahu you are tempted to believe that this is not 2019 Israel but Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. It is a scandal. It is grotesque. If you replaced Stars of David with Swastikas, you could be led to believe that this is not the State of Israel but some Totalitarian Regime of the 1930s and 1940s. 

While the Labour Party is being attacked by those who claim that it is Anti-Semite, the Conservative Party is being attacked by those who claim that it is Anti-Muslim. The British political scene is being used as a battlefield to deal with foreign agendas and in the meantime time is being wasted that should be used to solve the many problems that Britain is facing on a daily basis. 

Some say that Europe is becoming more and more Anti-Semite and others say that Europe is becoming more and more Anti-Muslim. Sooner than later the political imbalances created by Muslim issues and Jewish issues is going to turn into a gigantic nightmare and  violence is already spreading.

What looks like a potpourri of different issues is actually the representation of different pieces of the same political puzzle. 

Tolerance is being replaced by ideologically driven intolerance and this inevitably leads to violence. The gap between rulers and the ruled is growing and growing. Real dialogue is vanishing being replaced with repression. Proper governance is vanishing and in its place we have water cannons, guns and brutality. What is happening in French streets is not reassuring. 

Is this what we call Democracy? To have the high moral ground to criticise other countries, we must ensure that we don't engage in the same kind of actions that we criticise. France is a mess and in such environment it is no wonder that all kinds of Extremist views can prosper. Europe is no more Anti-Semitic nor Anti-Muslim than before. What we are seeing is the rise of intolerance and discontent that can have many faces.

  

  

Alison Chabloz: On Inquisition, learning and Social Change

Alison Chabloz: On Inquisition, learning and Social Change

If we to continue talking about what is offensive, grossly offensive and extremely offensive, Humanity would be stuck in the Stone Age for every time there has been a leap into the future we have to deal with those who feel offended by evolution.

As a Catholic, I reject the Catholic Church as a political, often repressive and hierarchical institution that in many respects has been guilty of the worst atrocities in human history. The Earth is not the centre of the Universe despite the fact that Galileo Galilei was arrested and forced to explain himself in front of an Inquisition. 

We would be living with the unnecessary threat of deadly illnesses and still believing that bleeding a human being is the way to get rid of the said illnesses if people had not gone out of the way and risked their lives to dissect human corpses to get to know about the human body and the bodily functions of the human body. 

We cannot know the full truth about conflicts happening in our time but there are those who issue laws and promote fear to prevent people from inquiring and researching to get a better picture of what really happened and what is really happening. For many years, the German Wehrmacht was blamed for the execution of Polish officers. It was easy to blame Germany for it because after all Germany had been defeated in war and the Soviet Union was the winning partner although the partnership soon came to an end with the beginning of the Cold War. The Polish soldiers had actually being executed by Soviet Soldiers following Stalin's orders, the same Stalin that decimated by the Soviet Army by executing practically all high ranking officers of the Soviet Army to the point that the Soviets faced catastrophic defeats both when fighting Finland and Japan.

There isn't one version of history. In fact, there is one version of every conflict for every individual involved or affected by it and not even the most capable historian would be physically capable of understanding and knowing the full extent of a single conflict, let alone the complexity of  what we know as World War Two. The number of those who perished is absolutely irrelevant and in any case nobody can honestly say that he or she knows exactly how many died, how the died and in some cases not even where they died because they just vanished in the widespread mess of war.

To accuse Alison Chabloz of being a Holocaust Denier is an insult. She doesn't deny that Jews and others were persecuted. She expressly stated in court and outside the courtroom that she never denied that persecution and killings happened. She questions the means and the numbers and there is a living human being who could state without a shadow of a doubt that he or she knows how, where and how many people lost their lives but, once again, Intolerance and Stupidity get on the way - sometimes in a very threatening and forceful manner on the way of those who want to get a better picture of what really happened.

If as Humanity we are stuck with myths and half-truths, we are going to be deprived of a fundamental freedom that it is the freedom to find the truth and the freedom to evolve. Socrates didn't go to his death for nothing. He chose to drank poison and die because he was dying for a fundamental principle. Socrates stated: Say something and I will prove that you are wrong. Say the opposite and I will prove that you are wrong. But some of those who say that they admire Socrates are the first ones to pass laws to prevent individuals from questioning official versions of events. Another great philosopher - Descartes - said "I think, therefore I exist". We exist because of the capacity to think and our thinking must not be dictated by intolerant idiots that want to force us to accept myths and mythology.

Alison Chabloz: Press Release December 8th 2018

Press Release December 8th 2018

Alison Chabloz Appeal due to start next week adjourned

For reasons yet unknown, the Appeal in the Alison Chabloz case due to start on Monday at Southwark Crown Court in London has been adjourned. At best, an outrageous example of listing malpractice on the part of the listing clerk and, at worst, a breach of Criminal Procedure Rules. What this now implies for the continuation of Chabloz' Suspended Sentence also remains uncertain. 

Chabloz was convicted last May under the notorious S. 127 of the Communications Act 2003 for sending and for causing to be sent “grossly offensive” messages consisting of three songs uploaded to the Internet. Militant pro-Israel group Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) had originally initiated a private prosecution after police and the CPS failed to take action against Chabloz.

Chabloz' songs break the taboo of matters 'Holocaust'. Herself a victim of harassment by persons closely associated with CAA including one of its directors, Chabloz explained during cross-examination that her songs were composed in reaction to this targeting of her professional and social life, in particular after police and authorities had dismissed Chabloz' own complaints. Chabloz' interest in Holocaust revisionism came about as a result of her support for the pro-Palestinian cause and condemnation of Israel. Last month on Remembrance Day, Chabloz laid a wreath at the Cenotaph in Whitehall in honour of the 784 members of the British Armed Forces who lost their lives during the Palestine Campaign 1945-1948.

Against all odds and despite constant unwarranted attacks, Alison Chabloz is recognised and appreciated beyond Britain. A professionally-trained musician, she was recently nominated to the role of Cultural and Artistic Liaison for the UK & Europe on behalf of the American Freedom Party. 

The Appeal will be re-listed on Monday for dates some time in the New Year. 

“Thanks to their creations, artists enable the layman to see things that would appear intolerable under the plain, naked light of day. The Artist tells us things about the world that can only be told by way of Art. That is why artistic freedom is sacred and without artistic freedom we are unable to find meaning in our own history and indeed in our own lives. Art is part of our western tradition and it's exceedingly worrying that artists are being prosecuted and convicted for their work.” ~ Damien Viguier, barrister.

Alison Chabloz: Details about herself and coming court appeal in London

Details about herself and coming court appeal in London.

By now, most people should be aware of how difficult - or even dangerous - it is to publicise alternative points of view not just in the United Kingdom but also across the world.

Mass Media distortions and vested interests are often getting in the way of the truth when it comes to knowing what those who don't share what are know as 'mainstream views' actually think or do. Do follow the link below the picture to get an update.

Alison Chabloz Online

Political Witch-hunt that will lead to violence

Political Witch-hunt that will lead to violence

There is a a new industry: the industry of political witch-hunt. Britain is becoming a Totalitarian State in which there are special interest groups that are out to create havoc that threatens to destroy public freedoms. 

The irony is that of the havoc created the very same groups that promote havoc will suffer the lethal consequences of what they are doing because where is action there is reaction and this is not just a law of physics. It is a law of life. The one doing the persecution will become prey.

It is most visible when it comes to the political system. We see the Labour Party accused of Anti-Semitism and Racism. We see the Conservative Party accused of Islamophobia. We see individuals that raise the alarm about the abuses committed by Muslims gangs and about the very real risk created by Islamic Extremists being taken to court and jailed simply because they are doing a public service.

The Crown Prosecution Service is being abused and used thanks to political pressure applied by pseudo charitable organisations like the CAA and cases are being created out of thin air to please a minority that has the power to force the Crown Prosecution Service to re-instate cases that had been previously rejected for lack of merit. Rumour and innuendo have become evidence. Something said in anger or a careless comment or even a joke has now become evidence to prosecute individuals who are not engaged in criminal activities and who most likely would not engage in criminal activities and the general public is paying for such nonsense while real crime is spreading across the United Kingdom and left unpunished.

The mass media are also guilty party because they benefit from the climate of fear and uncertainty generated. We are not in Colombia but we might well become Colombia when public anger is directed against irresponsible mass media.

The British mass media are no longer seeking the truth. They are just propaganda machines and this includes the British Broadcasting Corporation that persecutes old ladies for not paying the TV License by pays unjustifiably generous contracts to pseudo stars in a system in which one day A interviews B and C, the next day B interviews A and C and the following day C interviews A and B and it is all part of a club of exceedingly well paid celebrities. This Nomenklatura of the mass media is being paid for by British taxpayers that are forced to swallow propaganda and lies of people who have got an anti-British agenda.

The messages of the mass media are there to justify the political witch-hunt by saying that is fine to go against fundamental rights of some people as long as the rights of those they support are protected. The promote the idea that certain people that they don't like are guilty simply because they are who they are and there will be consequences. The backlash is not far away when mass media and politicians that promote such way of thinking will be targeted and eliminated in a tit for tat operation. 

The mass media, special interest groups and politicians will bring back the 1930s.

  

Britain: A lot more to worry about

Britain: a lot more to worry about

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/couple-ban-neighbours-look-home-east-sussex-dispute-council-cpn-order-a8423256.html

Britain is now cuckooland. The amount of irrational legislation going through Parliament is absolutely beyond belief and the fact that Police Forces are being used to enforce such levels of irrationality is beyond the pale.

While real crime is on the rise with dramatic consequences in terms of loss of life, Police Forces are being used as toilet paper to implement ridiculous pieces of legislation and engage in political persecution.

The usual talk about lack of Police officers is an absolute lie. There are more than enough Police officers. The point is not about the lack of Police officers but about the way Police officers are being used.

Police officers recording a demonstration for Brexit. They are standing with cameras on a balcony at one of the headquarters of the BBC in Millbank, Central London. This is usual procedure. Practically, every single public event is recorded and later on recordings can be used and are used as evidence in courts of law.

Jeremy Bedford Turner, an activist that criticised Jewish Power in the United Kingdom, was taken to court and jailed for daring to criticise Jewish Power by people who said that 'they were offended by what he said'. The truth of what he said wasn't actually challenged. The whole issue was about 'being offended by what he said'. A similar case involved Alison Chabloz, a musician that composed songs that challenged the veracity of what is being said by Jewish lobbies and repeated by Establishment and mass media about what really happened during World War Two. Once again, the charges were about 'offensive comments'. The veracity of what she said was never challenged because in actual fact there is not enough evidence to support what has become a myth. All we have about real numbers of those affected by World War Two is estimates, numbers that could never be proven with irrefutable evidence.

Crime is rising and most importantly serious crime is rising and lives are being lost, but Police resources are being diverted and used in harassment and political persecution. 

When Hate Speech Legislation becomes a tool for repression

Hate Speech Legislation becomes repression tool to deter people from speaking their minds in the same manner that Jesus's Disciples were told not to talk about Jesus after Jesus crucified. Today, it is the equivalent of the State using Hate Speech Legislation.

During World War Two, British soldiers were supposed to have given their lives to defend Free Speech but the Elites running Britain used secrecy and propaganda to stop people from learning the whole truth about the actions undertaken many of which contradict the official version of events.

Keeping records hidden from public view is not about protecting British interests. It is about protecting those who engage in wrongdoing. In the words of Mikhail Gorbachev, Britain needs a lot of Perestroika (Re-structuring) and Glasnost (Transparency). 

Amber Rudd MP has blood on her hands

Amber Rudd MP, as the most incompetent Home Secretary Britain has ever had and one of the shortest-lived in her post as Home Secretary after she lied to Parliament about the Windrush Affair involving the destruction of immigration documents that led to deportation of Black immigrants who were brought to Britain to rebuild a country ravaged by war, has blood on her hands.

Sending a man to jail for sticking bacon on the doors of a Mosque only for the said man to be murdered by Muslim Extremists in a British jail was one of the most irrational actions ever undertaken by a British Home Secretary.

Racially aggravated public disorder? Islam is a religion and Muslims are not a race. Aggravated public disorder? If somebody goes around running over pedestrians or a group of people steals vans and uses them to go around killing people on the streets, this is what I would consider aggravated-public disorder but sticking a piece of bacon on doors is not a risk to human life but it is a crime in the minds of an Establishment that has lost the plot completely. 

But not only that and it will go straight to the point. I do believe that killing more than 50 people and injuring many others in an attack in London in 2005 and in other events that followed also in London and in Manchester can be qualified as a terrorist attack. Having said that, I don't think that posting stickers at an University can be classified as a terrorist attack and even so an entire group of people - one of them Paul Hickman - were classed as terrorists and their group was banned.

I know that most people in the United Kingdom reject Capital Punishment but the events that led to the death of Paul Hickman constitute Capital Punishment. Faced with the real threat of being sent to jail, Paul Hickman took his own life. Capital Punishment for what? For posting stickers at an University. Amber Rudd MP's actions at the Home Office constitute Racism on a massive scale. She was complicit and when asked about it in the House of Commons she lied about it and ultimately lost her post as Home Secretary because of it. So she is one of the least qualified in the House of Commons to criticise anybody else for racism after some high ranking officials of a Conservative government engaged in an exercise of Institutionalised Racism.

I knew personally several of those accused of belonging to National Action and I not only knew them. I worked with several of them in perfectly lawful political activities. I worked with Paul Hickman then Regional Organiser. He was a kind and soft man and I remember him with affection.

I do not condone nor support irrational acts of violence but Paul Hickman was not a Terrorist. Idiots like Amber Rudd put lives in danger when she was supposed to prevent loss of life. What can you expect of an administration that via political reshuffles puts incompetent people in charge and gives them extraordinary powers? Cabinet Ministers in posts like the post of Home Secretary must have a proven record showing that they will meet the requirements of the job.

Look at her record both in government and outside government. Can anybody say that she had the qualifications to be Home Secretary, one of the most difficult cabinet posts? No, she had none of the qualifications required. She had no previous experience whatsoever and this is why her actions could only lead to disaster and loss of life.

A case that proves undeniable interference in British affairs including Judiciary

The extent of Jewish Power in the United Kingdom

Gideon Falter

THE EXTENT OF JEWISH POWER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism might appear to be an innocent title for an organisation that would merely be about preventing attacks against members of Jewish Communities but then you start digging up and finding things that you wish were not there. The ramifications go as far as affecting the administration of justice, the mass media, political parties and Parliament as a whole and even the Church of England that is supposed to be representing Christianity in the United Kingdom.

But it doesn't stop there. When you try and understand the motivations of the British Prime Minister in - for example - launching a missile attack against Syria based on lack of evidence and that constitutes a violation of International Law by bypassing the Security Council of the Organisations of the United Nations and engaging in military actions against countries that are not at war with the United Kingdom, sooner than later you come across Jewish lobbies. The well publicised visit of Priti Patel to Israel going to occupied territories and maintaining secret conversations without the knowledge of the Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson shows things as they are.

Gideon Falter, head of CAA, made explicitly clear that his organisation works in close cooperation with 10 Downing Street (the office of the British Prime Minister, the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service) but it goes much farther than that. When you look at the list of 'sponsors and/or members of the Management you find a former Archbishop of Canterbury and people who are very active within the Crown Prosecution Service and prominent figures of the Political Establishment.

The RT HON. The Baron

Lord Ahmad is the Minister for the Commonwealth and the United Nations at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. He was formerly the Parliamentary Under Secretary for countering extremism at the Home Office. During his political career he has taken a particular interest in communities and integration, and has ensured that Home Office Policy reflects the nexus between Anti-Semitism and Extremism.

Note: Home Office nexus between Anti-Semitism and Extremism. Terror Laws limiting Freedom of Speech and applied to cases not related to terrorism?

BOB BLACKMAN MP

Bob Blackman is the Member of Parliament for Harrow East. He has repeatedly spoken out against antisemitism in Parliament and tabled motions relating to antisemitism and the Holocaust. He is often sought out by the media to comment on antisemitism.

THE RT REV. AND RT HON. DR THE LORD CAREY OF CLIFTON PC RVC GBE FRSA

Both during his tenure as Archbishop of Canterbury and since, Lord Carey has spoken out firmly against antisemitism and worked tirelessly to strengthen bonds between Christians and Jews. Lord Carey led efforts to deepen the Church of England’s involvement in Holocaust commemoration, and has devoted many addresses to discussion of the lessons of the Holocaust. He is Honorary President of the International Council of Christians and Jews and in 2016 he delivered the Simon Wiesenthal Centre’s important Dorothy Gardner Adler State of Antisemitism Lecture.

THE BARONESS DEECH OF CUMNOR DBE

Baroness Deech’s career has been one of distinguished public service. She has served as chair of the Bar Standards Board, Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education, Principal of St Anne’s College, Oxford, and chair of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. She has also been a Governor of the BBC, and the Gresham Professor of Law. Hers is a staunch voice against antisemitism in the House of Lords and she has taken a prominent stance in calling out antisemitism at universities.

Note: Mass Media - BBC

MIKE FREER MP

Mike Freer is the Member of Parliament for Finchley and Golders Green. He has repeatedly spoken out against antisemitism in Parliament and the media. He first worked with Campaign Against Antisemitism to prevent neo-Nazis from demonstrating against Jews in Golders Green.

Note: Determines who demonstrates and where?

JONATHAN GOLDBERG QC

Jonathan Goldberg is a formidable Queen’s Counsel whose career has included many landmark criminal trials, most recently securing the release of Marine Sergeant Alexander Blackman. He is a fierce opponent of antisemitism and has personally seen to it that an antisemitic barrister was disbarred. He is a staunch supporter of Campaign Against Antisemitism and led our first private prosecution, pro bono.

Note: Active both internally and externally with regards to the Crown Prosecution Service.

FABIAN HAMILTON MP

Fabian Hamilton is the Member of Parliament for Leeds North East. He is proudly Jewish and takes an uncompromising stance against antisemitism. He is currently the Shadow Minister for Peace and Disarmament working in the Defence and Foreign Office Teams.

Note: Proudly Jewish and presumably proud member of the Jeremy Corbyn's Shadow Cabinet. This appears to somewhat contradict a statement made by Lord Mitchell. Mr Hamilton is Jewish and presumably supports Jeremy Corbyn.

COLONEL RICHARD KEMP CBE Colonel Kemp served in the British Army from 1977 to 2006. He was commander of British forces in Afghanistan and completed fourteen operational tours of duty around the world, including in Iraq, the Balkans and Northern Ireland. His last years of service were spent in the Cabinet Office where he headed the international terrorism intelligence team and was chairman of the COBRA Intelligence Group. Having retired from the army, Colonel Kemp is now a writer whose expertise is frequently sought by national and international news media. He also consults companies on leadership, security, intelligence, counter-terrorism and defence and is a public speaker in each of these areas. Having taken a professional interest in extremism, Colonel Kemp recognised the links between extremism and antisemitism, and the threat that antisemitism therefore poses to society. He has been giving his time to campaigns to raise awareness about antisemitism since his retirement and is well known as a staunch friend of the Jewish people.

Note: British Armed Forces, British Intelligence, you can interpret 'well known as a staunch friend of the Jewish people' and its connotations when it comes to Defence and National Security.

BRIAN KENNELLY QC Brian Kennelly is an award-winning Queen’s Counsel who has argued cases at the Supreme Court and various international courts. Prior to taking silk he was on the Attorney General’s ‘A’ Panel of Counsel to the Crown. He is sought after for his expertise in public administrative law and regulatory law, including sanctions against extremist organisations. He is a staunch supporter of Campaign Against Antisemitism and led our first judicial review, pro bono, resulting in the quashing of a decision by the Crown Prosecution Service not to prosecute a neo-Nazi.


Note: Pressuring Home Office to prosecute individuals after cases were rejected by the Crown Prosecution Service?

THE BARON MITCHELL OF HAMPSTEAD

Lord Mitchell has led a distinguished career in business and politics, during which he has always fought against antisemitism. For five years he chaired the Coexistence Trust, whose mission is to encourage dialogue between Muslim and Jewish students at British universities. As a prominent member of the Labour Party, he was highly critical of a report into antisemitism by Shami Chakrabarti which whitewashed severe and ongoing problems in the Party, and condemned her elevation to the peerage following the publication of the report (she remains the only peer ever nominated by Jeremy Corbyn). Upon Mr Corbyn’s re-election as leader of the Party, Lord Mitchell resigned from the Party on principle, telling a television audience that Mr Corbyn had failed to tackle antisemitism in the Party and had surrounded himself with people who are hostile to Jews.

DR MATTHEW OFFORD MP

Dr Offord is the Member of Parliament for Hendon. Since becoming an MP in 2010, he has campaigned against antisemitism, including by highlighting the permissive attitude of the authorities towards supporters of genocidal antisemitic terrorist organisation Hizballah.




NOTE: Notably an angle on issues not related to British internal affairs but more of an issue that affects merely Israel. Hizballah is not an anti-Semitic terrorist organisation but a Semitic organisation since those it represents are also Semites.

THE RT HON. SIR ERIC PICKLES

Sir Eric has devoted himself to fighting antisemitism throughout his political career. He has been instrumental in securing the widespread adoption of the International Definition of Antisemitism. He is the United Kingdom’s Special Envoy for post-Holocaust issues and has formerly served as the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. He was the Member of Parliament for Brentwood and Ongar for 25 years and used his last speech in the House prior to retiring to highlight the selection of disgraced former MP David Ward by the Liberal Democrats, resulting in Ward being sacked as a candidate within hours.

NOTE: Interesting angle in terms of intrusion of the Conservative Party into the internal affairs of another political party.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. When you witness certain cases brought to Crown Courts you see the implications and repercussions of certain associations. As Home Secretary during a Labour Administration, Jacqui Smith introduces a piece of legislation to combat Terrorism. From that point forwards, the temptation to use anti-Terror legislation in cases of Freedom of Speech has been irresistible. 

On March 7th 2017, The Guardian reports that "The Crown Prosecution Service is reconsidering whether to prosecute a far-right activist for alleged antisemitism on the eve of a highly unusual legal challenge to its decision to let the case drop. Government lawyers were due at the high court in London on Wednesday for judicial review proceedings brought by the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism."

What the previous paragraph shows is that Jewish Power active at 10 Downing Street twisted the arms of the Crown Prosecution Service to force the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute. 

The Guardian states: "The CPS originally examined the allegations against Bedford-Turner for five months, but decided in December 2015 a jury was unlikely to convict him of incitement to religious or racial hatred". 

The Crown Prosecution Service spent five months studying a case and decides not to prosecute. In March 2017, Jewish Power puts Crown Prosecution Service against the wall. Gideon Falter made a derogatory statement against the Crown Prosecution Service and the Police and said: "To get through the threshold of the police and then through the incompetent and arrogant attitude of the Crown Prosecution Service, it's practically impossible to get something prosecuted". 

When the Crown Prosecution Service and the Police acting within the limits of their attributions make a decision that does not satisfy Jewish Powers, Jewish Powers say that they don't please Jewish Powers because "they are incompetent and arrogant". This is an interesting interpretation of the role of those administering justice in the United Kingdom.

During a speech made in July 2015 in Whitehall, Jez Turner denounced the existence of the Shomrin that he refer to as an example of what he defined as disproportionate influence of Jewish organisations in the United Kingdom. Mr Turner said later on when the Crown Prosecution pressured by those Mr. Turner criticised had to prosecute. At a speech Mr. Turner made in 2017 he anticipated what would be the outcome of the prosecution. It is my view, taking into account the aforementioned, that Mr. Jeremy Bereford-Turner was crucified by those he criticised in a case that was not so much about Freedom of Speech, Racism or Anti-Semitism but about the dangers of challenging Jewish Power in the United Kingdom.

Mr Turner was sentenced to 12 months. Six of those months will be served in prison and the remaining six months will be served on licence (a form of conditional release with strings attached). Unwittingly, Jewish Powers in the United Kingdom have shown that Mr. Turner's assertions about 'disproportionate influence of Jewish organisations in the United Kingdom' are the truth, all the truth and nothing but the truth.

But there is a lot to be said about the fact that the case was only taken into consideration because of the pressure exerted by the Executive on the Judiciary. In a Democracy, there must be separation of powers (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary) and it is my view that the fundamental principle of separation of powers was violated and this creates a very dangerous precedent when the Executive acting on behalf of a private organisation with a very specific agenda of its own forces the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute.

And there is more. The Prosecution had the intention of using Anti-Terror Legislation against Mr. Turner and until the last minute made every effort to create yet another dangerous precedent by mixing legislation regarding Free Speech, Anti-Semitism and Terrorism.

If the separation of powers is violated, if legislation about Free Speech, Anti-Semitism and Terrorism is turned into one and the same thing, we are on a slippery slope towards a Totalitarian State.

Labour Party: It is not anti-Semitic to criticize Israel

Labour Party: It is not anti-Semitic to criticize Israel

Criticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic but there is a Zionist Witch-hunt going on across the United Kingdom.

Labour Party activists are being hunted from within the Labour Party and some of them are being expelled.

The CAA - Mossad within Number Ten Downing Street - has self-declared links with the British Prime Minister and with Police Forces in the United Kingdom that are being used as part of a Zionist-organised persecution of anybody who dares to stand against Zionism or dares to criticize Israel's actions in Palestine including the deportation of African refugees that are being thrown out by the government of Israel that is carrying out military operations in Syria and talking about annexing the West Bank - a meeting of the Likud Party supported further annexation of territories that were not party of the original Jewish State of Israel as sanctioned and authorised by the Organisation of the United Nations in 1948.

In the meantime civil freedoms in the United Kingdom are being eroded and anti-Terror legislation is being used by Zionist organisations to persecute anybody who dares to criticize Israel or questions its propaganda apparatus.

As part of the destruction of civil freedoms, Habeas Corpus and the Presumption of Innocence have been technically abolished. Today, everybody is guilty until proven innocent. Detention without trial for political reasons is now a reality in the United Kingdom turning the clock back to the times of Autocratic Rule in which Monarchs could imprison and execute political opponents.

 
Sadly, this is happening in the United Kingdom in which in some cases the names of those arrested and put on trial are kept secret as if the authorities were afraid of public opinion. Secrecy is often a synonym of Dirty.

British Soldiers, people who put their lives on the line of fire for Queen and Country, are being kept in British jails before trials have even started and remanded in custody. Trust, what Trust? Justice, what justice?