Hope Not Hate, British Security Services and misguided politicians and political operators created National Action

 

Hope Not Hate, British Security Services and misguided politicians and political operators created National Action

Some people in this coutry surely disagreed or hated the British National Party and its then Leader Nick Griffin, but the BNP was standing for elections, getting elected representatives, playing by the rules, and by then there was not talk of any real threats or national security issues. 

In fact, there was a time when the BNP has many Counsellors elected, had a Member of the London Assembly Elected and two Members of the European Parliament. Therefore there was no appetite for any unfortunate adventures nor illegal activities. Everybody was playing by the book, but contratry to their names organisations like Hope Not Hate were busy spreading hate and promoting violence by trying to deprive voters of legitimate choices. Finally, the demise of the BNP thanks to do-gooders led to an environment in which individuals like Jack Renshaw, Mark Jones and others went the wrong way and in 2013 National Action was founded not to pursue or engage in legal political activities. They saw the demise of the BNP as living proof that it was no use to take part in legal political activities and this is why the name National Action. This refers to direct actions against those they saw as political enemies.

Years have passed but the same wrong strategies are in place and this includes using anti-terror legislation and in particular Schedule 7 for political purposes, detaining and harassing political operators or even blocking their personal back accounts and blocking party political bank accounts to presumably depriving political movements from the necessary resources that they use to stand in elections. Forced by a party political organisation called Electoral Commission - the Electoral Commission in violation of its remit is preventing political organisations from being registered as political parties and forcing their members to stand as independent candidates in every election where and when they can stand. 

The recent by election in Wakefield - called because of sexual misconduct of the Member of Parliament that represented the said constituency - is a clear example. Police forces were used for political purposes to detain, harass, and prevent political operators from engaging in the lawful business of standing in elections. The latest report indicates that thanks to Police actions bank accounts were frozen or closed down and all done for purposes of political persecution in the United Kingdom.

Just a few days ago at Walworth Police Station near Elephant and Castle in London, I had the opportunity to talk with two members of SO15 - I am always open to talk with members of the British Security Services - to give them advice about the errors of their ways and about how the troglodite measures of Police forces in the United Kingdom are actually promoting terrorism. Quite a few examples of such measures tell me that Security Services in the United Kingdom and this goes down to Police Forces in the United Kingdom are out of their depth and have very little understanding of what is actually happening.

Precisely because of the fact that Nationalist organisations are not being allowed to operate lawfully -  many are not even allowed to registered as political parties and on top of that when they stand independent candidates they suffered politically motivated arrests, harassment, have property seized and bank accounts frozen or closed down - there is the certain danger that individuals deprived of the right to take part in lawful political activities might suddenly decide to engage in other kinds of political activities and seek the support of external organisations or even foreign governments to achieve their aims. 

External organisations and foreign goverments can hit a pot of gold. As anybody rational and knowledgeable enough would understand, people can become national security assets not for Britain but for foreign organisations and foreign goverments. Security Services and the Armed Forces in Britain know that they have been infiltrated by political operators many of whom have strong support within the Security Services and within the Armed Forces. An article published by The Guardian attests to that but timidly refers - sometimes directly and sometimes indirectly to 'far right extremism within the Security Services and the Armed Forces'.

God help Britain if there is ever a war in Europe. There is every sign that Britain will be attacked from within. When it comes to politics and geopolitics, there are no national borders anymore and British Security Services, politicians and mass media can naively believe that blocking financial resources in the United Kingdom they will prevent well trained operators from doing whatever they set themselves to achieve. For example, financial resources can be transfered without registered bank accounts. Although British troops are not formally deployed in a theatre of war in Europe, the war is already taking place in many different forms and this is being reflected by economic realities. Does anybody understand that present economic uncertainties and political instability are caused by geopolitical decisions adopted by the British government? When you try to destabilize another country because of what is happening in Ukraine then you are bound to suffer the consequences and this is exactly what is happening. Sanctions and other measures adopted against the Russian Federation are backfiring in a big way and both Western Europe and Eastern Europe are feeling the brunt. 

What role will British Nationalists play? They have no reason to be loyal to a system that seeks to destroy them and in the process destroy Britain. Something very similar is happening in other European countries. In Germany, both industrialists and trade unions fear economic instability leading to political instability. In the Netherlands, we see different interest groups including those involved in transport sectors and farming taking action i.e. farmers acquiring water canons to counter-attack if attacked by Police forces. None other than the Dutch Vice President of the European Commission alerted about the certain danger of social unrest. Ladies and gentlemen, misguided geopolitical decisions and equally misguided environmental policies will lead Europe towards the 1930s. If Europe moves towards the 1930s, who do you think will benefit? And going back to Germany, will the Grünen in Germany be willing to put aside their aspirators if it becomes patently clear that we do need to use more fossil fuels to cope with present challenges? How long will Herr Olaf Scholz coalition last?

SO15, British Police forces, politicians and mass media need to understand that although geographically Britain might be a group of islands we cannot be in isolation in terms of economic, social and political developments happening right now in Europe. They must also understand that blocking individuals and preventing them from participating in lawful political activities they are creating an even greater danger in the United Kingdom.

The Fall of the BNP and the rise of National Action

The Fall of the BNP and the rise of National Action

There is no coincidence that groups like National Action appeared in the United Kingdom. The demise of the British National Party under a disastrous leadership led directly to the rise of extremist groups and National Action is one of them but there are many more and their numbers are being fulled by a very myopic approach that enriches the rhetoric of the violent against the principles of democratic coexistence.

Liberalism and Marxism have become the new intolerance. Marxism has always being intolerant but now has joined forces with Liberalism in a struggle that is destroying the foundation of a democratic way of life.

The designs and ulterior motives of Liberals and Marxists matter more than the will of the Electorate. We have been here before. The Weimar Republic comes to mind for the Weimar Republic was described as a democracy without democrats.

By putting obstacles along the way, Liberals and Marxists and the drivers of political correctness are destroying our democratic way of life. When people are banned from organizing political parties to take part in lawful democratic activities, Liberals and Marxists are creating the recipe for the destruction of our democratic way of life. Whether you like or dislike what people stand for, all political views should be present on the ballot for the Electorate to decide.

The then Home Secretary Amber Rudd banned National Action. What did she achieve? If I said 'Absolutely nothing,' I would be generous. She achieved something. She managed to increase radicalisation because the ideas of National Action have spread under other names and the myopic actions of the Electoral Commission are now being used as a recruitment tool.

When political ideas cannot be expressed within a democratic framework, radicalisation grows and spreads. If political fights do not take place by using ballots, we end up in a situation in which ballots will be replaced with guns.

Liberals and Marxists like to talk about the Good Friday Agreement that put an end to the troubles in the Republic of Ireland and in Northern Ireland. What was the idea of the Good Friday Agreement? To allow both Unionists and Republicans to engage in a democratic process as a meas to put an end to violence.

Using the same logic then, the Electoral Commission shouldn't use its powers to prevent the participation of political groups in democratic elections because by using its powers in such a manner the Electoral Commission is going against the spirit of the Good Friday Agreement. Democratic participation is the way to prevent violence. If the Electoral Commision prevents democratic participation then the Electoral Commission is promoting violence and I don't think that the Electoral Commision should be promoting violence because this is not what the Electoral Commission shoul.d be about.

We need as much democratic participation as possible. We need everybody involved in the democratic process. 

 

.

Danger ahead: National Action - you can ban a name but you cannot ban an idea

Danger ahead: National Action - you can ban a name but you cannot ban an idea

When in 2016 the then Home Secretary Amber Rudd decided to ban National Action and made membership of National Action a criminal offence, she didn't take into account that you can only ban names but banning names doesn't stop an idea from spreading even faster.

A few days ago, Lizzie Dearden writing for The Independent revealed that National Action factions are growing in number. So let's be clear. The then Home Secretary lacked the necessary expertise to deal with the issue and there was no one available to alert about the very serious mistake she was about to make.

After the court trials and the ban, followers of National Action simply went underground and out of sight they can become a lot more dangerous and especially when they are supported by present and former members of the British Armed Forces.

The fall from grace of mainstream political parties and the perception that the political classes have a completely different agenda that is incompatible with the expectations of the British Electorate have created an environment that is fertile ground for organisations like National Action to spread its ideas. Austerity leading to hardship condemning not just the unemployed but also those in employment to a struggle for survival creates exactly what National Action needs. People are fed up, disenfranchised, falling into the hands of loan sharks, feeling unfulfilled, forgotten and thrown aside. 

The news about bank branches closures, closure of branches of well-known retail companies, cuts affecting local schools, the failures of the Welfare State and other big items like the fall of British Steel affecting an estimated 25,000 families are exactly what National Action needs for recruiting ever more followers. There is the feeling of 'they don't care about us'. 

While the present Home Secretary Sajid Javid talks about an update of anti-terror legislation,  what we need is a better deal for families across the United Kingdom. A growing number of cases of suspected mental illness are the direct consequence of people living under enormous stress caused by financial difficulties. Repression will only make existing problems at lot worse. We need to deal with sub-employment - people at work that live in poverty.

By improving living conditions, we can improve physical and mental health, eliminating key factors that lead to extremism and terrorism. 

The Independent: Ban against National Action produced opposite effect

The Independent: Ban against National Action produced opposite effect

The Independent reports that a ban against National Action implemented in 2016 by the then Home Secretary Amber Rudd has produced exactly the opposite effect. There are more factions that follow the same path as National Action.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/national-action-neo-nazi-terrorist-far-right-uk-ban-a8878466.html

Dear Ben Wallace MP,

When the ban against National Action was implemented, Amber Rudd was very proud of her actions against National Action and there were celebrations. The mass media also talked about the trials taking place very publicly and all in all politicians and mass media thought that something major had been achieved. I never thought that such degree of political naivete was possible in a country like Britain that is supposed to have superior Security Services. Rosie Cooper’s feelings about being safe and the celebratory mood about having neutralized certain danger are not justified.

When I first heard the news that Amber Rudd, then Home Secretary, had issued the ban my first thought was ‘what a stupid thing to do’. If you drive danger underground, danger will not go away. Quite the opposite. You will not see it and it will continue to grow because the mentality of the people you are dealing with see such bans as an incentive and others are encouraged to join in because they see them as heroes, as role models, as fighters for the cause whatever their cause might be and no matter how misguided they might be.

This was John Tyndall a long time ago.  Any similarities with what is happening right ago? The picture was taken ages ago when John Tyndall was a young guy. Certain ideas have been around for a very long time. They are not going to go away with political bans or social media bans. The danger is very real but you cannot deal with it by running certain individuals underground. You don’t deal with the problem by creating martyrs or celebrities and this is exactly what Amber Rudd and others have created.

Instead of tackling the problem effectively, politicians, mass media and para-political organizations are making the problem much worse as they go along.

It is self-evident that the methods used until now are not working and the situation could be a lot worse than you think. You are a decision maker. You can make things happen. Law Enforcement Officers, even those in charge of protecting Members of Parliament, are only trained to deal with ordinary criminals. They have no sense of political and historical perspective.

You are not dealing with ordinary criminals. You are dealing with people who have got a very particular state of mind, driven by Messiah-like attitudes based on the idea that ‘the end justifies the means’. Their appreciation of what is rational and of what isn’t is different from our sense of what is rational and of what isn’t rational.

We are made to believe that this was an isolated incident. This was no isolated incident. There is clear thinking behind it. There is an intention. It was done to test the mood within the Armed Forces and it sends a clear message. Because it was widely reported, it became a widespread subject of conversation. There will be those watching, testing reactions, getting to know where others stand, what others think about the subject. I am not surprised that serving members of the Armed Forces were found to be linked to National Action. I would be surprised if middle ranks were not aware of the existence of certain ideas within the Armed Forces.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen

Brexit: Trust in Democracy can only be restored when politicians deliver on what they promise

Brexit: Trust in Democracy can only be restored when politicians deliver on what they promise

Anna Soubry was called Nazi by a protester in front of the Houses of Parliament. That was a wrong thing to do because she isn't a Nazi. 

Having said that there is one claim that can be made. She has failed to deliver what she promised to her voters and to the Nation..The same has happened with other Members of Parliament. After the Expenses Scandal and several other shortcomings, Brexit would have been the golden opportunity for Parliament to redeem itself. Instead, trust in Parliament is at an all time low. But trust in Parliament is not the only one issue. There has been a loss of faith in Democracy.

Five days before a crucial deadline to leave the European Union, nobody knows with certainty what it is going to happen. There is a power struggle between the Executive namely the Prime Minister and the British government and Parliament. Parliament has been wrestling control away from the Executive and this poses questions about the foundations of Democracy that stands on Division of Powers - Executive, Legislative and Judiciary.

The authority of the British Government has been eroded but also the authority of the leaders of political parties has been eroded with renewed accusations of Anti-Semitism made against Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party and of Islamophobia against the Conservative Party as a whole. This is happening when unity within the two main political parties should exist to ensure sustainable governance.

Since the General Election of 2017, there has been a hang Parliament in which the Conservative Party had to negotiate an alliance with the Democratic Unionist Party of Northern Ireland. There have been so many conflicts that several key members of both the Conservative Party and of the Labour party decided to resign their membership of their political parties and even a Liberal Democrat MP resigned the whip of his party because of disagreement with regards to his political party's position concerning Brexit.

To the already complex political situation, where do the British Armed Forces stand? Apart from a scandal created by the revelation that active members of the Armed Forces have joined a now banned organisation called National Action, a video was published showing members of the Armed Forces doing shooting exercises using a poster with the image of Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the Opposition, as a target.

Fears regarding an European Parliament Election that Britain might have to take part in have encouraged political parties that the mass media have classified as Far Right to participate in the said European Parliament Election at a time when in Continental Europe there is a mood that would produce great political gains for political forces opposed to the European Union Project.

In France, where last time around Emmanuel Macron was offered as an alternative to the then Front National and now Rassemblement National, President Emmanuel Macron is not just the least popular President in the history of France. For the first time, the French people hate a French President. This puts Rassemblement National in pole position to obtain a vast number of seats in the European Parliament.

In Italy with a political alliance of Right and Left and in Germany there is the possibility of getting many anti-EU Members of the European Parliament Elected. In recent elections in Germany, Alternative für Deutschland entered every single one of the sixteen state Parliaments and is the official opposition in the Federal Parliament.

With this in mind, will the present authorities of the European Union agree to an extension that would allow a massive number of anti-EU Members of Parliament to be elected and make decisions regarding the European Commission and the long term budget of the European Union? 

The coming week promises to be even more crucial not just for Britain but also for the future of the European Union.

.

 

National Action: I have said all along that National Action is very much part of the Armed Forces

National Action is very much part of the British Armed Forces

Quite a few times I mentioned to my own Member of Parliament and to members of the British Cabinet that serving soldiers and veterans were training paramilitaries in the United Kingdom. Nobody listened.

I also said that if lower ranks were involved medium ranks were fully aware of their political affiliations and inclinations. Nobody listened.

My Member of Parliament asked me if I was willing to talk to Member of the Security Services about it. I declined. Why? Because I don't trust British Security Services. I don't trust them because of their record in certain matters and I don't trust them because of evident levels of sheer incompetence.
There is no fear. For serving soldiers fully aware of the implications of showing themselves shooting at a picture of Jeremy Corbyn to do what they did is a clear hint of what could certainly happen and of the mood within the British Armed Forces.

General Election? Is it wise? Jeremy Corbyn could go the way Salvador Allende went and Parliament could become a thing of the past.

National Action: The Truth will shock you

NATIONAL ACTION: THE TRUTH WILL SHOCK YOU

In the early days, Jack Renshaw was like any other guy of his age. He had a healthy interest in politics and he had a career to show for it. He like many others joined the so called Far Right because he believed in the Nationalist spirit. He like many others was feeling increasingly angry against the so called political establishment that he and others saw as giving preference to outsiders in spite of very pressing needs of Britons that were not being met. What he heard from speakers like Richard Edmonds from National Front and others convinced him that he was on the right path. At the time, what was defined as British Nationalism was very much linked to Racial Politics and World World Two. There was nothing about violence but there were very well defined boundaries in terms of political activism, of the notion of us and the others. The preferred way was political and everything was about winning elections.

Jack Renshaw was made by Hope Not Hate, the UAF, the BBC and also by the Labour Party and its para-political branches. Everywhere the British National Party went, its supporters were called Nazi, Fascist and Racist to the point that instead of being offended by such labelling many got to the conclusion that whatever they did they would still be called Nazi, Fascist and Racist. Things got to a point when the stereotype created by those who were against the British National Party created a public image that attracted individuals that admired the Dritte Reich and its policies. 

British Security Services infiltrated the British National Party pretending to be genuine supporters and acted as agent provocateurs promoting loose talk. British Security agents went around inciting people to talk about the Dritte Reich, Adolf Hitler and making salutes while pretending to be British National Party Members. The Police had no interest in protecting the public. All they wanted was to compromise the British National Party for political reasons reinforcing existing stereotypes. 

British Security Services have for a very long time being involved in criminal activities and in this case it was about criminal activities with a political purpose. We tracked down British agents when they were not pretending to be political activists i.e. some of them were working at the Home Office in Croydon when the Croydon Branch of the British National Party was rising.

British agents had no limits. They identified vulnerable people - including those with health issues - and used them to spy on the British National Party and to create internal dissent. This combined with internal differences were the seeds of what happened years later despite big electoral successes.

The planned agenda was to bring down the British National Party and attacking individuals was a way to do it. If you were a British National Party member you were banned from certain jobs in the state sector. Much more than that, if you were a known member of the British National Party you would not be employed or you would lose your job also in the private sector. This continues to apply even when the British National Party is not even one per cent of what it used to be in terms of political success. This form of political discrimination that seriously undermined personal lives and family lives contributed to create the feeling of being hunted and pushed many over the top making them believe that this is was not just political. It became a fight for survival and in a fight for survival you kill or you are killed. It is an issue of Us or They.

Extremism has been promoted by political parties, para-political organisations like Hope Not Hate and the UAF, the mass media and the Security Services. People were becoming disenfranchised not just from politics but also from society as a whole that they saw as the enemy that had to be eliminated.

People like Jack Renshaw went from being healthy youngsters with political ambitions to being people frustrated and angry that no longer saw the point of trying to engage in the democratic process. The idea was then 'they hate us, they are ruining our lives, let's stand up and fight.'

Discrimination, persecution, harassment and bans will promote extremism. When people feel that they are being hunted, for a while they will withdraw and when they feel that there is nowhere to go they will turn around and kill.

We need open debate but not just debate. We need plural debate. We must not push people underground to the point that they no longer believe in democracy and fairness. When people become disenfranchised, they will be dangerous. If they are isolated from the rest of society, they will see society as the enemy. 

   

Peter Rushton: Badly misinformed about the character of English Law

Peter Rushton: Badly misinformed about the character of English Law

Once again, Peter Rushton has been found wanting on the pages of Heritage and Destiny. Under the title "Chabloz succeeds in criminalizing Holocaust denial", Peter Rushton blatantly shows that he knows very little about English Law in this regard.

As a matter of fact, Holocaust denial is not a crime in English Law and therefore nothing of what happened last week at Southwark Crown Court changes such fundamental fact.

If Mr Rushton had bothered to show up during the three days of the deliberations at Southwark Crown Court he would have been able to produce a better report of what happened at Southwark Crown Court.

Mr Rushton then writes about the ill informed views of Richard Edmonds about the trial.

That’s because the earlier court judgment could not set a precedent: it applied only to Ms Chabloz’s particular case. Richard Edmonds warned in an article for the Heritage & Destiny website published on January 2nd – ‘Does Alison Chabloz know what she’s doing? Or criminalising “Holocaust”-revisionism by the back door’. Mr Edmonds’ warning has been fully vindicated this week.

He wrote:
“This is not the case with the findings of a Crown Court. It is not impossible that should in February Ms. Chabloz lose her appeal at Southwark Crown Court, then her case, involving as it does elements of the so-called ‘Holocaust’, could be used as a legal precedent to launch criminal prosecutions against Historical revisionists by the back-door, so to speak, in the absence of any formal laws in Britain banning ‘Holocaust’-denial.”

Once again, Richard Edmonds himself shows lack of acumen regarding the legal process and makes assumptions that are not based on fact. Richard Edmonds is writing about something he didn't witness and knows very little about.

Unfortunately, Peter Rushton - a man classed as a historian - couldn't stick to facts because neither him nor Richard Edmonds bothered to show up to really know what happened. 

It is fact that certain countries like France consider that Holocaust Denial is a crime. In the United Kingdom, Holocaust Denial is not a crime and a three day trial did not set up a precedent of any kind in this regard.

It is fact that millions of Jews were harassed, persecuted, tortured and killed in a variety of ways. No amount of revisionism can change that. Playing with numbers doesn't change the horrendous nature of what happened.

To say that the Holocaust didn't happen is to say that Adolf Hitler never existed, that Mein Kampf was never written, that the speeches made about getting rid of Jews were never made, that the Geheime Staatspolizei, the Schutzstaffel, the Waffen SS and even end units of the Wehrmacht proper were not committed to the expulsion, imprisonment and eradication of Jews.

This is John Tyndall, high ranking official of the National Front and later founder of the BNP of whom Richard Edmonds was a great admirer. Most probably one of the reasons why so called members of National Action show themselves with the same flag. White supremacists, Jew haters. 

We are talking about National Socialists that refuse to accept one of the core principles of National Socialism. The Holocaust did happen. We can discuss about numbers, about places and about methods used but no amount of discussion can erase what actually happened.

All the talk about who is and who isn't a revisionist coming from the authors of Heritage and Destiny is absolute crap generated by personal animosity and hatred.

   

   

National Action infiltrated British Armed Forces under Amber Rudd's Watch as Home Secretary

National Action infiltrated British Armed Forces under Amber Rudd's Watch as Home Secretary

The news that elements of National Action infiltrated the British Armed Forces is actually no news at all. For a very long time, elements of the British Armed Forces have been training British para-military groups in several locations in the United Kingdom.

When you have an individual like Amber Rudd in charge you can expect a lot worse to happen. She was incompetent as Home Secretary and this is why she was forced to resign.Why putting Amber Rudd back again in the Cabinet? Because of desperation. She banned National Action. So what? Did she expect that those involved in National Action would be deterred by her legal action? Did she really think that banning National Action things were going to go back to what they were before?

Nothing happens in the lower ranks of any military organisation without the knowledge of the Middle Ranks and this raises very serious questions. To what extent Junior Military Officers respond to National Action? They are armed and they have what it takes. The high ranks of the Chilean Army were oblivious to the designs of General Augusto Pinochet until the very last minute and I suspect that something very similar is happening within the British Armed Forces. The Political Establishment didn't have a clue. Allende was a sitting duck and his top Generals were totally unaware of what was coming. Parliament was easily wiped out because the reality is that Politicians have no real power and if there is a coup most politicians would be running for cover. The mass media operators would follow because they wouldn't want to be shot down. What would happen? The mass media would very quickly 'join in' and seek 'an accommodation deal' to continue to operate.

Those of us who lived through a military coup and dictatorship know how things develop and I am seeing the tell tale signs of things to come.  What individuals like Amber Rudd did was to push people underground thus making them a lot more dangerous. They don't need a name to continue to operate. You need a name if you are a political organisation including a political party willing to stand in elections. Elements of National Action don't want to stand in elections and anonymity is one of their best assets. All National Action is to place sympathetic elements within structures of power and this includes the Armed Forces. They will have people working within the Police and other strategic organisations.

Why the Establishment keeps pestering and targeting individuals like Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen? Because they are publicly known and easily targeted. How do you target people whose existence you are not aware of? You don't because you cannot. They are invisible. They could be standing next to you and you wouldn't be aware of what they are planning to do. I guess Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi paid the ultimate price because of their lack of awareness and the Political Establishment could be about to learn a very harsh lesson and they should be thinking about Jo Cox MP. Did her position as Member of Parliament save her life?

Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!

Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!

The Windrush Scandal brought Amber Rudd down but her incompetence was shown long before. I knew Jack Renshaw and many of those accused of being members of National Action. None of them would be capable of any acts of terrorism. The whole thing has been a shameful circus for political posturing.

About 85% of inmates in British jails are Muslim. What does this tell you about what is going on? Then came the reports that more whites are being arrested and charged with terrorism. Why? Because they had to use Police Forces to show that they were not being unduly harsh with Muslim criminals. The fact of the matter remains that all those murdered in terrorists acts in the United Kingdom have been killed by Muslim criminals or Muslim converts. Lee Rigby was killed by Muslim converts. A Police Officer was slaughtered in Westminster stabbed by a Muslim convert. Not a single person has been killed by a white terrorists because there are no white terrorists.

Liberals and Marxists want to justify their ideological stances by blaming innocent whites and pursue their campaign of ethnic cleansing that is destroying Europe. ethnic cleansing that will lead to war and to the disintegration of democratic institutions that has taken centuries to forge.

It took centuries for women to be able to vote. Muslims treat women as slaves or at best as second or third class individuals. Many of them believe that they have to deliberately damage women's bodies with the so called Female Genital Mutilation or that they have to be hidden, covered with bed clothing when they walk on the streets. An Asian Lady Peer denounced that Muslim men were importing women to use them as cash cows by exploiting the welfare state by claiming benefits for children of several wives.

Many Muslims believe and they speak openly about it that women only exist to pleasure men. The promise of tens of virgins to deliver sexual pleasures to those who blow up themselves for Allah more than proves the extraordinary disregard for women to be seen not as wives and mothers but as objects to be exploited. They not even respect their own daughters to the point that for ages there have been ongoing investigations about forced marriages and about girls that have been killed or have had to escape, to run away from their families, because they felt that their lives were in danger. This is the Islam, the so called culture, that Liberals and Marxists want to impose on us.

For more than sixteen years, Police and Politicians looked the other way while thousands of vulnerable children were raped and drugged by Muslim gangs and those raising the alert were accused of racism. Instead of protecting vulnerable children, for the said Police Officers and Politicians it was more important to protect their positions at the expense of vulnerable children and they wilfully protected Muslim criminals.

The rage against Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, against Nick Griffin and others is that they not only denounced Muslim depravity and terrorism. They have actively campaigned against Muslim depravity and Muslim Terrorism. The Security Services themselves say on a regular basis that they are quashing terror attempt after terror attempt of Muslim Terrorists and when they failed to do so people died. Lee Rigby was beheaded by people that the Security Services were trying to recruit. They couldn't foil attacks in London and Manchester and people died. We have Hate Priests using public spaces, Mosques and Cultural Centres to spread hatred against Non Muslims. Not only that. We have jails being used to promote Muslim Terrorism. 

The real terrorists have not been members of organisations like National Action. The real terrorists have been supported by Liberals and Marxists.

The icing on the cake was Amber Rudd's actions during the Windrush Scandal. She deliberately lied to Parliament about the immigration shambles in which documents were destroyed and families who came to Britain in good faith have been made to suffer. Whether dealing with Terrorism or dealing immigration, Amber Rudd was not fit for purpose and now she is trying to rock the boat to ignore the will of the British People that in a democratic exercise decided to leave the European Union.

Tommy Robinson is neither Far Right nor Racist

Tommy Robinson is neither Far Right nor Racist

Lizzie Dearden - as a well as whole array of politicians and mass media operators - have falsely accused Tommy Robinson of being Far Right and/or Racist. Why? What are the foundations for such labels? There are no foundations whatsoever. Why is this happening? Because politicians and mass media operators can get away with murder. It is about power without responsibility. 

If you challenge the BBC or private mass media you face a wall. For example, the BBC is judge, jury and prosecutor of its behaviour unless they are challenged by some people with power and financial muscle. Otherwise, the BBC can do whatever. It can destroy innocent people who don't have the power to defend themselves and BBC reporters get away with crime as it is criminal to demonise people who don't have the power to protect themselves.

If try to complain to the board that deals with excesses committed by private mass media, the said board will tell you that they can only deal with mass media that are signatories of a Code of Conduct and only as long as the said Code of Conduct refers to the kind of crime being committed.

To sum up, if you are not powerful both in terms of influence or of financial muscle you don't stand a chance to get a fair hearing. This is execution by power without responsibility.

When the killing of journalists begins, irresponsible journalists will have only themselves to blame. A Member of Parliament already lost their life and many more will follow if the present trend to defame, libel, distort and misrepresent other people goes on.

Britain has changed. Europe has changed. Public anger is growing rapidly and the time will come when no Police Force, no Armed Forces, will be able to prevent a social and political explosion.

Jo Cox MP was embarked in a witch-hunt and this is why she was killed. Many swore to follow the same path and might face the same fate. Demonising innocent people is a boomerang that will come and haunt you and your family. This is a crucial time in the history of Britain and in the history of Europe. Demonising must stop. Labelling must stop. Defaming must stop. Libelling must stop. Distortion must stop.

Moment of Reckoning Approaches as tensions rise in UK

Moment of Reckoning Approaches as tensions rise in UK

I have never seen in the United Kingdom such tensions. As if this wasn't enough, tensions are also being promoted by mass media. Britain has been suffering from tensions created by Muslims and Jews - the poison chalice for any Western Civilization - and now the problems have been compounded by political meltdown very much generated by Muslims and Jews and acolytes.

The situation is dire. A vast number of families cannot make ends meet and this is happening why flood immigration is spreading as poison in the blood system of a country that has fallen victim of its own desire to help everybody. Political Parties unable or unwilling to deal with serious issues, dominated by people with anti-British agendas, are promoting a climate that will end in civil war.

When a political system cannot deal with peoples' problems and meet peoples' needs, the scene is ripe for widespread violence. More and more people are disenfranchised and no longer believe in the political system and are ready and willing to do by force what cannot be done by reason.

Politics will be made on the streets as censorship is on the rise and Social Media are becoming more and more repressive. If people cannot use the pen, people will use the sword.

UK: Frustration is dangerous and will certainly fuel extremism

Frustration is dangerous and will certainly fuel extremism

For the first time, I am hearing people openly talking about joining paramilitaries and even National Action in the United Kingdom. Extremely high levels of frustration are creating a pressure cooker effect and the unthinkable might happen. 

At a gathering people spoke about using IRA tactics in Britain to fight against the political establishment and the mass media including BBC, SKY and others that have a very clear anti-British political agenda.

When it was mentioned that several serving soldiers were on trial for suspected membership of National Action, I saw the whole picture. No one in the British Armed can have certain ideas without the middle ranks knowing about it and this leads me to the fact that National Action is alive and well inside the British Armed Forces.

Banning an organisation doesn't get rid of the ideas that led to the creation of the said organisation. What is more, the present trend to prevent people from expressing what they believe (attempts to control Internet, bans and censorship carried out on Internet will only make things worse. When people are not able to express their feelings and ideas in writing, they will carry out attacks. Like an animal pushed against a wall, with nowhere else to go, people will turn violent.

Only yesterday somebody suggested that Police Forces are being readied to deal with Civil War in the United Kingdom because Civil War is coming. Spaces for dialogue are vanishing and the harsh approach put into practice by Police Forces in the United Kingdom show that it is self-evident where things are heading.

I reject the idea of going around publicly threatening individuals or communities but I do understand the level of anger shown by some who do go around threatening individuals or communities. More often than not we have seen members of Muslim Communities with placards talking about beheading those who do not surrender to Islam. We have seen them burning Poppies and insulting and threatening British troops and the beheading of Lee Rigby is a clear example of what is to come showing that what is written on placards is very much the announcement of what is going to happen in the no so distant future.  

 

Amber Rudd MP has blood on her hands

Amber Rudd MP, as the most incompetent Home Secretary Britain has ever had and one of the shortest-lived in her post as Home Secretary after she lied to Parliament about the Windrush Affair involving the destruction of immigration documents that led to deportation of Black immigrants who were brought to Britain to rebuild a country ravaged by war, has blood on her hands.

Sending a man to jail for sticking bacon on the doors of a Mosque only for the said man to be murdered by Muslim Extremists in a British jail was one of the most irrational actions ever undertaken by a British Home Secretary.

Racially aggravated public disorder? Islam is a religion and Muslims are not a race. Aggravated public disorder? If somebody goes around running over pedestrians or a group of people steals vans and uses them to go around killing people on the streets, this is what I would consider aggravated-public disorder but sticking a piece of bacon on doors is not a risk to human life but it is a crime in the minds of an Establishment that has lost the plot completely. 

But not only that and it will go straight to the point. I do believe that killing more than 50 people and injuring many others in an attack in London in 2005 and in other events that followed also in London and in Manchester can be qualified as a terrorist attack. Having said that, I don't think that posting stickers at an University can be classified as a terrorist attack and even so an entire group of people - one of them Paul Hickman - were classed as terrorists and their group was banned.

I know that most people in the United Kingdom reject Capital Punishment but the events that led to the death of Paul Hickman constitute Capital Punishment. Faced with the real threat of being sent to jail, Paul Hickman took his own life. Capital Punishment for what? For posting stickers at an University. Amber Rudd MP's actions at the Home Office constitute Racism on a massive scale. She was complicit and when asked about it in the House of Commons she lied about it and ultimately lost her post as Home Secretary because of it. So she is one of the least qualified in the House of Commons to criticise anybody else for racism after some high ranking officials of a Conservative government engaged in an exercise of Institutionalised Racism.

I knew personally several of those accused of belonging to National Action and I not only knew them. I worked with several of them in perfectly lawful political activities. I worked with Paul Hickman then Regional Organiser. He was a kind and soft man and I remember him with affection.

I do not condone nor support irrational acts of violence but Paul Hickman was not a Terrorist. Idiots like Amber Rudd put lives in danger when she was supposed to prevent loss of life. What can you expect of an administration that via political reshuffles puts incompetent people in charge and gives them extraordinary powers? Cabinet Ministers in posts like the post of Home Secretary must have a proven record showing that they will meet the requirements of the job.

Look at her record both in government and outside government. Can anybody say that she had the qualifications to be Home Secretary, one of the most difficult cabinet posts? No, she had none of the qualifications required. She had no previous experience whatsoever and this is why her actions could only lead to disaster and loss of life.

Robbie Mullen: A very unreliable witness that states that he is racist, anti-Semite and Islamophobe

Robbie Mullen: A very unreliable witness that states that he is racist, anti-Semite and Islamophobe

This morning at Courtroom 8 at the Old Bailey in Central London we witnessed the most astonishing confession by a man that under oath as a witness in a case that he himself contributed to bring to court. When asked why he joined National Action in 2015, Robbie Mullen said that joined National Action because 'he hates Blacks, Jews and Muslims'. If this is not an indictment against himself, I don't know what is.

Having been one of the most notorious and vociferous members of National Action, Robbie Mullen  when asked why he didn't join National Front instead said that he didn't join National Front that he saw as a group of old men and that he was looking for action. 

Despite the fact that National Action was finally proscribed, Robbie Mullen continued attending meetings and complaining that nothing was being done. As days went by, there was a turn of events. Robbie Mullen decided to turn against those he had joined and started a series of secretly recorded conversations - his former associates were not made aware of the fact that he was recording what they were saying and that he was instigating them to say something that even as a joke or said as a stupid remark under the influence of alcohol could put them in a very compromising position.

Robbie Mullen was a man on a mission and he came up with a series of statements linking his former associates with attempts to commit serious crimes. Paradoxically, despite the fact that he said that he believed that there was the real intention to commit serious crimes that involved loss of life, he failed to contact Police authorities. Robbie Mullen chose instead to contact Matthew Collins, former National Front member, now working for Hope Not Hate. From the moment he contacted Matthew Collins, Hope Not Hate started supplying important amounts of money to Robbie Mullen. There were monies for a passport, monies for daily expenses including transport, monies to pay for rented accommodation, computer hardware, a photographic camera and hotel rooms paid by Hope Not Hate. Some of the monies were delivered to him in paper envelopes and taken by him without any questions asked - according to what Robbie Mullen stated today at the Old Bailey pressed by barristers representing the interests of the accused. 

According to Robbie Mullen, Hope Not Hate contacted and paid a solicitor an important amount of money to act on his behalf and it was the said solicitor who got in touch with Police Authorities. When it was decided that Robbie Mullen was going to act as main witness in the present trial, Police officers explicitly requested that Robbie Mullen was not going to talk anybody else about the investigation. Robbie Mullen was asked not to talk to Police officers not directly linked to the investigation, not to talk to his former associates of National Action and not to talk to Hope Not Hate.

Robbie Mullen completely disregarded the Police officers' request and went on talking with his former associates, with other Police officers and also passing information related to the case to representatives of Hope of Hot Hate including Matthew Collins who was not aware that Robbie Mullen was secretly recording conversations he had with representatives of Hope Not Hate. One such recorded conversations was heard this morning at the Old Bailey. When asked why he had recorded a conversation he had with Matthew Collins, Robbie Mullen couldn't come up with a proper answer.

Robbie Mullen has been on the payroll of Hope Not Hate since April 2018 presumably working as 'Researcher' but before that he had been taken monies given to him by Hope Not Hate. This beggars belief. Why would Hope Not Hate employ somebody that records private conversations they have with him? One has to ask what is Robbie Mullen's real agenda. Having publicly declared that he joined National Action 'because he hates Blacks, Jews and Muslims' was not one of his best moments in court. Whether the aim of his actions is to incriminate innocent people acting on false pretences and for personal gain or whether there is a master plan behind his actions, Robbie Mullen is a very unreliable witness.   

Hope Not Hate confirms that British Judiciary is controlled by Zionists

Hope Not Hate confirms that we knew all along: Zionists control the British Justice System. To make matters worse, on the very same day that Jez Turner was convicted the Zionist Army slaughtered 60 unarmed Palestinians including babies and injured more than 2,700 of a crowd of unarmed demonstrators against Jewish occupation in Palestine.

Hope Not Hate states that "the conviction is another setback for the group (London Forum)" but this is contradicted by views expressed by represented of many other nationalist groups that clearly stated that the conviction of Jez Turner is a unifying force for nationalist groups across Britain as this shows even the most moderate members of the Nationalist Movement that opposing Zionism in all its forms is an over-riding priority and objective.

Gideon Falter CAA

By his own admission, Gideon Falter - one of the heads of CAA (and reportedly linked to CIA), stated that he works very closely with 10 Downing Street and this could lead to major issues indicating that the separation of powers (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary) has been violated leading to the conclusion that Zionists used their influence at 10 Downing Street to pressure the Crown Prosecution Service that had initially disregarded accusations made against Jez Turner.

But there are other issues that are not less important and as crucial as the fact that Jews control mainstream political parties, influence mass media and put pressure on the Judiciary. A group called National Action that was recently banned is extremely active with participation of former and present members of the British Armed Forces that organised training camps for paramilitaries in various regions of the United Kingdom. Members of the British Armed Forces could decide to target Jewish interests directly. This is extremely serious and is being totally disregarded by British Authorities.

As we learn from incidents happening in Germany, Muslim immigrants are now turning against Jews and Jewish authorities in Germany have advised Jewish people not to wear any garments including skullcaps that could give away their Jewish identity. Rising anti-Jewish feelings is now one of the main concerns in Germany. As Zionists murderous activities in Palestine shock the world and send shock-waves across Europe, it is not unthinkable that Muslim operators could become increasingly aggressive against Jewish people in the United Kingdom and that the actions of Israel could be a unifying factor for several strands within Muslim communities in the United Kingdom.

Members of Jewish Communities are becoming increasingly concerned about the consequences of the actions of the government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likud Party and the potential consequences for Jews across the world.

National Action: British authorities and the mass media are trying to invent chocolate all over again

National Action: British authorities and the mass media are trying to invent chocolate all over again.

A headline published by The Independent on 8 September 2017 very much reflects the way of thinking of the British Establishment. They believe that banning a political organisation the said organisation will no longer exist. This is cuckooland thinking. You can ban and ban and ban and the organisation will continue to exist simply because it doesn't need to operate within a democratic framework.
A political movement (Politische Bewegung) doesn't have the constraints of a political party that needs to stay within the limits of the Electoral System. For many years, the British Establishment has been attempting to ban or derail Nationalist Political Parties like National Front, the British National Party, UKIP and others. The end result has been that unable to express their ideas within a democratic framework thousands of former political activists are now joining para-political organisations like National Action and others by the thousands either as members or sympathisers. These are the political realities that so called mainstream political parties have created and continue to promote.

Extremism can only be fought against in the ballot box. Using legislation introduced by now former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith designed to combat Islamic Terrorism to persecute individuals for political purposes will backfire in a big way. People are being sent to jail and kept in jail before they are even proven guilty of any alleged crimes. Habeas Corpus? Non existing. Detention without trial is the new reality and the whole burden of proof has been turned upside down. Before, everybody was innocent until proven guilty. Now, everybody is guilty before proven innocent. This is a mockery of the legal process and will completely destabilise British Society that is now run by the mobs. Even a Presidential visit of a duly elected US President was cancelled because of the pressure exerted by mobs and Universities are no longer centres for education but centres for political persecution and political discrimination. People are being kept in jail merely because they have been accused and we dare to criticise North Korea.

The Independent says that 'National Action is evading authorities by taking on new names - allegedly including Scottish Dawn and NS131 - in a technique used prolifically by Anjem Choudary's Islamist Network'. Is this news? For goodness sake, the said technique is as old as the world and the authorities should have foreseen that as soon as one name gets banned another name will pop up. The newspaper reports that a former detective said Police are left powerless to arrest neo-Nazis under new names. It takes weeks or months to take a case to Court and by the time the case is dealt in court names would have changed a few times. They are chasing smoke clouds driven by Political Correctness that is leading to violations of fundamental Human Rights.

A woman stands in court accused of composing, singing and posting on Internet a song that is according to the accusing party 'detrimental and deeply offensive to Jews'. They forget to mention that in the song Alison Chabloz deeply criticizes Jewish violations of Human Rights in Palestine. Keeping Palestinians in deplorable conditions is something that they are willing to forget about because 70 or so years ago Jews were persecuted in Europe. The Gaza Strip has been carpet bombed a few times, ten of thousands of Palestinian homes were destroyed and scores (thousands of thousands of Palestinian men, women and children were either killed, maimed or injured but all is forgiven because 70 or so years ago Jews were persecuted in Europe). So anyone who engages in criticism, condemning abuses in Palestine is due to be silenced by being accused of being a Nazi, a Fascist, an anti-Semite and so forth. This is the logic of Political Correctness that certain minorities are openly and abusively using to defend what is indefensible from a Human Right standpoint.

In Britain, there are stringent laws to deter people from engaging in acts of violence and the present political environment amounts to repression that will produce the pressure cooker effect. Those promoting repression will produce exactly what they are trying to avoid. People need to be able to vent their anger without engaging in acts of violence but the more we are made to feel that we live in a Police State the worse things will be.

National Action: Over-generalisation leading to gross injustices

National Action: Over-generalisation leading to gross injustices

Whether National Action has been banned or proscribed for whatever reasons that the British government hasn't fully justified with facts, we need to focus on the rights of individuals and on how those rights are being eroded.

We have seen demonstrations carried out by Islamic organisations in the United Kingdom that have publicly and very loudly talked saying that their fundamental aim is the destruction of the British Way of Life. They have not only burnt Poppies or insulted British Soldiers that were returning from the battlefields. They have actually engaged in the promotion of terrorism against Britain.

I don't see National Action doing anything of the sort. They are not going around detonating bombs in Manchester and London. They are not driving vehicles and killing people on the streets. They are not going around chasing girls and boys to rape them or to ply them with alcohol and drugs as some Muslim groups in the United Kingdom have done.

The British Government is using Anti-Terror Legislation to persecute people who are not involved in acts of terrorism and the definition of what constitutes Terrorism and what doesn't constitute Terrorism is open to abuse by British Authorities.

I happen to personally know individuals who are now facing the courts falsely accused of being involved in acts of terrorism. I did know Paul Hickman who took his own life facing the threat of a  court using kangaroo charges that are a total fabrication. I happen to personally know Jack Renshaw and Jack Renshaw is not the kind of person that would possible be what the British Authorities seem to believe that he is.

This issue affects me personally because I strongly believe that these injustices are being committed on the name of Political Correctness going mad.

I have personally written to the Home Office Secretary Amber Rudd MP, as I have written to Helen Hayes MP, Jo Swinson MP, and to the Head of the North East Counter Terrorism Unit, alerting them that extremely serious injustices are being committed and all for the sake of Political Correctness.

Whether any of the aforementioned British Authorities wants to take any notice of what I have said remains to be seen but the point has to be made.

National Action: Proscribed but Thriving Organisation

National Action: Organisation banned in the United Kingdom.

The organisation known as National Action might have been proscribed but its numbers are rising steadily. In more than one way, the fact that it has been declared illegal in the United Kingdom has made it even more attractive for anyone who is fed up of what is happening today in British politics.

I speak regularly with many disenchanted members of certain political parties that tell me that "there is no longer a political solution and that they will be joining groups like National Action".

Whether they finally join or don't join National Action, the fact remains that National Action numbers keep growing and now include members of the British Armed Forces, people who have military training, have access to weaponry, and now have an ideological foundation and direction of travel.

The Independent newspaper published an article about the fact that Police authorities are investigated the British Armed Forces because elements of the British Armed Forces have been found to be linked to National Action.

I contacted The Independent to talk about the subject but they haven't come back to me - maybe they will do so in the future. National Action is just one of a myriad of smaller groups that have made the transition from political parties to political movements. Politische Partein/Politische Bewegungen.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/national-action-neo-nazi-soldiers-arrests-far-right-terror-charges-plot-extremism-inquiry-calls-a7933356.html

There are paramilitary training camps across the United Kingdom where many youngsters are given a cocktail of military training and ideological formation. These are not the usual Sturmabteilungen. They are more like fully-fledged Schutzstaffel.

Lizzie Dearden is a beginner in this area of research. I was active in the 1970s and 1980s in Latin America and very much aware of political strategies used by paramilitary organisations like National Action but the level of sophistication has risen exponentially. There are Blue Collar National Action members and White Collar National Action members and they are very much part of everyday Britain.

White Collar National Action members are members of organisations and institutions that are not publicly associated with the ideals of National Action. When political success is a long way away, infiltration is the most successful strategy. If I were to reveal even a small number of names, the country would be up for a massive emotional shock because many individuals usually associated as active anti-Far Right campaigners are National Action members in disguise.