Showing posts with label Defence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Defence. Show all posts

Tuesday, 8 July 2025

Rachel Reeves and the 5% for Defence expenditure

 

Having seen what we have seen until now when it comes to monies and politics, can you trust the British Prime Minister and his promises about Defence?

I asked and asked again. Can we trust statements made at the latest NATO gathering? Political speeches and posturing do not pay for massive investments and massive borrowing and massive borrowing is already an issue when Britain´s credit rating is at stake. If things become any worse and interest paid on public debt keeps going up, how long before we head for a financial crash?

Any reforms are now compromised for the duration of the present administration and strikes are just beginning. How long will Rachel Reeves be able to keep the boat afloat? There are three ways to get resources and each has a price. We can raise taxes. We can borrow. We can reduce services. For each of the three there is a political cost to pay. Raising taxes can be popular with the left of the Labour Party, but deeply unpopular for the business community and, ultimately, will lead to higher prices of utilities and goods. Borrowing will lean to higher interest paid for public debt. Cutting services will not be popular with members of the public. None of them will be a vote winner in the present environment. 

But what that means for British standing? How reliable can a country that cannot pay its debts be? If one of the core members of NATO cannot afford to deliver what it promises, what does it say about NATO itself?


Wednesday, 19 December 2018

Project Fear: Jayda Fransen arrested at Gatwick Airport today

Jayda Fransen arrested at Gatwick Airport today and more examples of Police Incompetence


Police officers arrest Jayda Fransen at Gatwick Airport today

From my own research into British Security Services, I know about the lack of coordination between Security Services. Britain is spending vast amounts of money and authorities want to make you believe that you are protected. Protected from what? 

They knew the culprits of July 7th 2005. How many people died or lost limbs because of the incompetence of the Security Services? They knew the men who killed Lee Rigby. Lee Rigby was beheaded in plain view of passers by. They knew the identity of the culprit that detonated explosives in Manchester at a music concert. What happened? Men, women and children were killed.

Ladies and gentlemen, you are not protected at all. Dwindling numbers of officers of  Security Services are being used in political persecution, harassing and playing a role in what is no more than pretence. Numbers of Police officers are falling across the United Kingdom and mismanagement is all too obvious.

Those sent to Gatwick Airport today asked Jayda Fransen for her passport. She explained that she couldn't produce a passport because her passport had been taken by another branch of the Security Services. Later on they got into a frenzy when one of the officers accused her of trying to reach his gun. A grown-up man behaving like an idiot. How can we trust individuals that show such levels of incompetence?

In the face of danger, Britain is naked. The only reason Britain is not brought down to its knees is that those seeking to harm Britain have not decided to launch a lethal attack.

While Ministers in charge of the Defence of the Realm kiss each other and congratulate themselves for the good work that they are blatantly incompetent to do, the Armed Forces are also facing a crisis. The gates have been opened to those coming from the Commonwealth who would like to join the British Armed Forces but, wait a minute, many of those coming from the Commonwealth are Muslims. So now Muslims who might have the intent to harm Britain are going to be trained and armed by the British Armed Forces. What a diabolic idea!








Tuesday, 20 November 2018

National Action infiltrated British Armed Forces under Amber Rudd's Watch as Home Secretary

National Action infiltrated British Armed Forces under Amber Rudd's Watch as Home Secretary


The news that elements of National Action infiltrated the British Armed Forces is actually no news at all. For a very long time, elements of the British Armed Forces have been training British para-military groups in several locations in the United Kingdom.

When you have an individual like Amber Rudd in charge you can expect a lot worse to happen. She was incompetent as Home Secretary and this is why she was forced to resign.Why putting Amber Rudd back again in the Cabinet? Because of desperation. She banned National Action. So what? Did she expect that those involved in National Action would be deterred by her legal action? Did she really think that banning National Action things were going to go back to what they were before?

Nothing happens in the lower ranks of any military organisation without the knowledge of the Middle Ranks and this raises very serious questions. To what extent Junior Military Officers respond to National Action? They are armed and they have what it takes. The high ranks of the Chilean Army were oblivious to the designs of General Augusto Pinochet until the very last minute and I suspect that something very similar is happening within the British Armed Forces. The Political Establishment didn't have a clue. Allende was a sitting duck and his top Generals were totally unaware of what was coming. Parliament was easily wiped out because the reality is that Politicians have no real power and if there is a coup most politicians would be running for cover. The mass media operators would follow because they wouldn't want to be shot down. What would happen? The mass media would very quickly 'join in' and seek 'an accommodation deal' to continue to operate.

Those of us who lived through a military coup and dictatorship know how things develop and I am seeing the tell tale signs of things to come.  What individuals like Amber Rudd did was to push people underground thus making them a lot more dangerous. They don't need a name to continue to operate. You need a name if you are a political organisation including a political party willing to stand in elections. Elements of National Action don't want to stand in elections and anonymity is one of their best assets. All National Action is to place sympathetic elements within structures of power and this includes the Armed Forces. They will have people working within the Police and other strategic organisations.

Why the Establishment keeps pestering and targeting individuals like Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen? Because they are publicly known and easily targeted. How do you target people whose existence you are not aware of? You don't because you cannot. They are invisible. They could be standing next to you and you wouldn't be aware of what they are planning to do. I guess Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi paid the ultimate price because of their lack of awareness and the Political Establishment could be about to learn a very harsh lesson and they should be thinking about Jo Cox MP. Did her position as Member of Parliament save her life?