Anti-Semitism campaigners in the United Kingdom appear to be working together with elements of the British Far Right and they appear to have a common interest in terms of going against Muslims and Pro-Palestine campaigners.
Paul Besser has been seen with Paul (former British National Party activist and organiser and present leader of Britain First) and with Jayda Fransen (formerly Britain First Deputy Leader and now involved in the leadership of the British Freedom Party due to stand in elections in Scotland to challenge Nicola Sturgeon for a seat in the Scottish Parliament).
It can be said that Anti-Semitism campaigners are very close to Tommy Robinson (Stuart Lennox) and have been involved in campaigning for Tommy Robinson and have participated in rallies supporting Tommy Robinson. Anti-Semitism campaigners have also been involved with Anne Marie Waters (leader of For Britain) that also has an anti-Muslim narrative and has supporters that usually attend rallies, supporting Israel and are not favourable to the cause of Palestine. Former members of National Front and British National Party have publicly joined Anne Marie Waters. It must be said that Anne Marie Waters is a former member of UKIP that became disassocited from UKIP because of her views on Islam.
We know from the media (i.e. The Independent newspaper online) that there have been reports of threats made by Tommy Robinson against journalist like Lizzie Dearden that constantly classify Tommy Robinson as Far Right activist.
All three - Tommy Robinson (former BNP), Paul Golding (former BNP) and Jayda Fransen (former BNP and now associated with Nick Griffin (former BNP Leader) and Jim Dowson (former financial supporter of the BNP and founder of Britain First), have been convicted for incidents against Muslims in the United Kingdom. The question to ask is: are pro-Israel and anti-Semitism activists in the United Kingdom actively cooperating with the British Far Right to go against Muslims and those who support the cause of Palestine?
Tommy Robinson - Pro-Israel and anti-Islam
The links are apparently everywhere. It looks like some media are playing both sides at the same time. On the one hand they condemn Far Right activists for engaging in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, but they don't seem to want to talk about the obvious marriage of convenience between some anti-Semitism activists and the Far Right engaged in campaigns against Muslims in the United Kingdom.
Many politicians and many in the mass media are being less than honest by talking about issues when it suits their agenda and looking the other way when it doesn't suit their agenda.
This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.
Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters
The tragedy of so called British Nationalism is that some of those portraying themselves as British Nationalists are driven by arguments that have little to do with promoting British interests. Confusing arguments born out of desperation in an attempt to be politically meaningful.
In a conversation I had with Anne Marie Waters, the key issue was that meetings organised by Anne Marie Waters and those linked to Anne Marie Waters kept being cancelled or rejected indicating that those who own venues or manage venues don't wish to be associated with Anne Marie Waters.
In politics, perception is critically important. For Britan, has incorporated elements of the British National Party that were associated with the very same ideas that Anne Marie Waters says that she rejects. None other than Julian Leppert was elected Councillor representing the British National Party and now he represents For Britain as Councillor - their only Councillor.
It appears that Anne Marie Waters hasn't done her research properly. In a desperate attempt to build a power base, she has incorporated members of the Far Right that were and are directly linked to the very same things that she talks against.
Here, Anne Marie Waters appears surrounded by prominent figures of the British National Party, including Eddy Butler, the mastermind of the British National Party electoral success in Barking and Dagenham that got 12 Councillor elected and one of the British National Party stalwarts that got Richard Barnbrook elected as Member of the London Assembly. She might persuade those who are not aware of the political background of her core supporters. I don't think that Anne Marie Waters is a naive individual. I think that she is being disingenous.
The comment made by a well-known political activist was 'I think that she was very badly advised to make a video attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative'. Mark Collett was also a prominent British National Party member.
Jeffrey Marshall, also a prominent British Party member, posed as a friend of Jewish Communities. Here he was at a Synagogue, wearing a yamaka and taking part in a religious ceremony.
Most of the core members of For Britain, including the only elected representative (Julian Leppert), have one thing is common. They are all former members of the British National Party. What led Anne Marie Waters to publish a video directly attacking Patriotic Alternative?
The British National Party is everywhere. It is in For Britain, in Patriotic Alternative and in Britain First as Paul Golding was also a prominent member of the British National Party. Many of those supporting Tommy Robinson - including Tommy Robinson himself - can be traced back to the British National party. In fact, For Britain and several other groups are the direct consequence of the fragmentation of the British National Party that went though a similar process as the National Front from which it derived.
Here you see Tommy Robinson at a British National Party meeting listening to Richard Edmonds. Was Tommy Robinson unaware of the ideas of Richard Edmonds who was a vital link with National Front? I have met Tommy Robinson quite a few times. I don't think that Tommy Robinson was or is a naive individual. He left the BNP and went on to join the English Defense League that is fervently anti-Islam. In 2013, he left the English Defense League, criticized EDL, but took over its anti-Islam platform that he shares with Anne Marie Waters.
In fact, all groups that came out of the British National Party and the British National Party itself share the anti-Islam platform. Fragmentation was not the consequence of ideological differences. Fragmentation was very much the consequence of personalities and internal feuds.
At practically all rallies in support of Tommy Robinson or Anne Marie Waters, you see Israeli flags. This would lead some operators to think that Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters are supporters of Zionists and of the State of Israel. Are they? How much do Jewish Communities actually support Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters?
In the muddy world of British politics, it is difficult to know who stands for what. This is why, regardless of any statements of Anne Marie Waters - as long as much of her power base is directly traceable to the British National Party - her attempts to disassociate herself from certain political platforms will not change public perception.
Today, Britain is very much focused on the tragedy generated by Corona Virus. Most people don't have the time nor the inclination to engage in profound political analysis and the days in which so many are losing their lives do not seem to be the proper time to discuss certain political issues. When the present health crisis is hopefully over, I believe that Britain will be in many ways a different country.
To rebuild Britain, we will need real politicians working together for the common good. Those existing on the fringes of British politics, driven by personality feuds and empty slogans will be as irrelevant as ever before.
Nick Lowles: From Searchlight to Hope Not Hate to.... with a penchant for Islamophobia
In 2016, the National Union of Students attempted to ban Nick Lowles to deny him a platform because he stood accused of Islamophobia. It has been reported that Nick Lowles is no longer the head of Hope Not Hate, in spite of the fact that articles signed by Nick Lowles are published by The Guardian.
If such penchant for Islamophobia happens to be true, then Nick Lowles would have joined the likes of Nick Griffin, Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson that - surprise, surprise - stand accused of Islamophobia.
Nick Lowles: Anti-Muslim campaigner?
To have spent quite a few years as an 'Anti-Racist' campaigner, ending up being accused of Islamophobia like many of those active in the so called Far Right seems a bit of a fall from grace.
On this day and age, perhaps the Security Services using new legislation should ask him his pins and numbers of all his electronic devices to find out what he actually up to.
I wonder if Nick Lowles has any links with Moscow. Having links with Moscow was the reason why the Security Services detained Paul Golding at Heathrow Airport and took him away with handcuffs when Paul Golding refused to deliver his pins and passwords. Trump charges for terrorism were made against Paul Golding that will be in Westminster Magistrates Court on February 27th 2020 at 2:00 o'clock to answer against the said charges in what is nothing more than another piece political persecution.
The British mass media and some British politicians want you believe that we live in a free country, but unfortunately when somebody who has absolutely nothing to do with terrorism and stands against terrorism is arrested, manhandled and falsely accused, all illusions of being in a free country fall overboard.
Every single piece of repressive legislation - like a knife - can be used for the right reasons and for the wrong reasons. When Jacqui Smith, then Home Secretary under a Labour goverment, introduce anti-terror legislation, voices were raised to caution against the certain possibility that anti-terror legislation could be misused. Nick Lowles was more interested in demonising and harassing those he didn't like and not even paid lip service to public freedoms. What Nick Lowles should take into account is that he himself could be targetted with the tools he used against others. The Porno Home Secretary - she and her husband used to claim Parliamentary expenses for pornography videos - took an active party in putting aside Habeas Corpus and the Presumption of Innocence, making possible to detain individuals without access to legal counsel.
We live in a very strange world. Nowadays, regardless of ideology, race, gender, et cetera, you could end up in court accused of terrorism simply because you refuse to surrender access to your private information contained in electronic devices. We started fighting against terrorism and we ended up creating a terrorist state. And, once again, Nick Lowles was instrumental in the creation of a terrorist state.
Jayda Fransen: How to be in Northern Ireland without being in Northern Ireland?
The incompatibilities of two legal systems: England's legal system and Northern Ireland's legal system are being used for political harassment and anti-terror legislation is being used for purposes that have nothing to do with tackling terrorism.
Northern Ireland is de-facto a country outside the United Kingdom, no matter what British politicians want you to believe and this is all too real when dealing with legal issues.
When it comes to bail conditions in England and in Northern Ireland, the English legal system struggles to find solutions that are not part of present legislation and judges have to be "creative' (creative is one way of putting it) to fill up the gaps created by legal incompatibilities.
Jayda Fransen's real residence is a property in Northern Ireland but English authorities forced her to reside in England having to pay for accommodation in England that she could ill afford. She was given the choice to live in a hostel surrounded by real criminals including drug-addicts, rapists, paedophiles and the like. Although part of the bill for housing is paid by the state, people placed on bail and forced to live at a certain address that is not their home address are forced to pay part of the bill even when they have their own homes somewhere else in the United Kingdom.
Given the fact that the reasons to imprison her and to later impose draconian bail conditions were utterly political, she was treated like somebody involved in Islamic Terrorism. Due to her very high political profile, she asked SO15 to ensure that the places where she was going to be forced to reside in were safe but SO15 officers failed in their duty of care and told her that 'if she was attacked, she would be transferred to some location in Liverpool'. Translation: wait until somebody attacks you for us to protect you.
A female Probation Officer when asked a direct yes/no question about very serious issues could only come up with a reply saying 'I believe that...'. "I believe that'? An Officer of the Law is not supposed to believe. An Officer of the Law must be able to answer Yes or No. Either security measures were implemented or security measures were not implemented.
We can hardly blame a Probation Officer of not being able to answer a direct question after listening to Members of Parliament including Members of the British Government talking about liability and evidence. They could only produce words like perhaps, maybe, possibly, most probably when dealing with an extremely serious accusation against another country.
It should be mandatory for Members of Parliament to witness trials to see how Legislation is actually being implemented and to see what is going wrong. The judges were struggling to pass sentence but in the end it is not the judges' fault to be put in such idiotic situation because of defective legislation passed by incompetent Parliamentarians who very seldom have to face real everyday cases in the courts.
Are British Courts of Law and Police Services being used for political persecution? Yes, they are. Anti-Terror legislation is being used in cases that have nothing to do with Terrorism. Police Officers are being ordered to detain and arrest individuals using Anti-Terror legislation in cases that have nothing to do with Terrorism.
The so called Prevent initiative has done more damage than good. If anything, it has created widespread animosity because of blatant abuses. Abuses will not promote trust. Abuses will promote Extremism. We have seen Police Officers asking families to denounce their own relatives and friends and asking teachers to denounce their own pupils including those of a very young age. These are not just nonsensical attitudes. They are dangerous attitudes. What kind of society are they trying to create?
Jayda Fransen was told that she wasn't allowed to live in Northern Ireland but was forced by English Court to live in Northern Ireland
The original sentence after spending nine months in jail was that she could not live in her house in Northern Ireland. She was released and the bail conditions were that she could not live in her own home and had to pay for rented accommodation something that she couldn't afford for too long and the alternative was to start sleeping rough.
At this point, she decided to return to her own home in Northern Ireland. British authorities then requested that she should return to England where she was arrested at Gatwick Airport, taken to Bromley South Police Station, spent the night in a Police Station cell and in the morning was taken to Bromley Magistrates Court that told her to sign a form indicating that she could only live in her house in Northern Ireland.
So what was all this about? She was arrested because she went to live in her House in Northern Ireland and the court in England decided that she could only live in Northern Ireland.
Police resources were wasted, Court resources were wasted and Jayda Fransen's life was unjustifiably turned into living hell because of the madness of the legal system. As if this wasn't enough, Police Officers who went to Gatwick Airport to arrest her didn't have a clue about the whole affair and asked for her passport when Police Forces themselves had taken her passport and even threatened her with trumped charges.
Jayda Fransen: going through hell for the sake of the truth
This is Jayda Fransen using one of the most powerful weapons known to man: a microphone. Why? To tell things as they are, not as the Political Establishment wants the public to believe that they are.
Marxist Wikipedia calls her a Fascist. Well, if denouncing gang rape of British children ignored for a very long time by politicians and Police forces for fear of being called Racists is Fascism we should all be Fascists.
In Rotherham and in many other cities across the United Kingdom gangs mostly made up of Pakistani Muslims terrorised thousands of children that were drugged, plied with alcohol and pass around to satisfy the sexual needs of individuals some of whom are now being arrested, put on trial and convicted as it is vox populi because their names and image has been publicised by mass media and the press.
Denoncing crime and expressing rejection of crime is not a crime but it seems to have become a crime when individuals like Jayda Fransen are persecuted, harassed, arrested and jailed for daring to speak the truth. No sooner Jayda Fransen was released draconian bail conditions were imposed including Jayda Fransen being forced to live in a hostel sharing space with drug addicts, pedophiles and other common criminals -just a continuation of what she had to endure when she was in jail surrounded by Muslim criminals.
The fact the Probation Service involved didn't allow her to live in her own home speaks volumes about the way processes are being used for political persecution against those the Political Establishment doesn't like because they remind the Political Establishment of the failures of the Political Establishment.
Jayda Fransen is forced to live in fear because any excuse - even the most ridiculous and irrational reason - can be used by the Probation Service to demand her arrest for her to be sent to jail.
When you stand for the truth, when you stand for justice, you automatically become a marked person as I myself experienced on my way to Moscow, Russian Federation, on a family trip and a few days later, once again, in my own home when I was subjected to political interrogation. Unfortunately for the MI5 agents sent to talk to me, I have no political involvement. I am a researcher in the areas of politics, data gathering and military strategy and tactics.
I referred the matter to a Member of Parliament that did the proper enquiries but the government was less than candid about MI5 political involvement in the United Kingdom. I am not talking about counter-terrorism. I am talking about using British Security Services for political persecution - when laws and procedures can be bent for political purposes and Police Forces become Political Police.
Theresa May refuses to protect Pakistani Christian Woman for fear of offending Muslim Terrorists in UK
Asia Bibi - Christian Pakistani
You couldn't make it up. British Prime Minister is afraid of Muslim Terrorists living in the United Kingdom and for this reason refuses to offer asylum to Christian Pakistani woman Asia Bibi, member of a Christian Pakistani community under threat.
Such fear is the same kind of fear that motivated politicians and Police to look the other way when thousands of children were being raped and killed by Muslim rape gangs mostly made up of Pakistani Muslims.
When activists like Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen campaigned against Muslim rape gangs and Muslim extremists, they ended up in jail accused of racism and terrorism. Why do Muslims seek refuge in Western Christian countries? Because they are running away from the so called Religion of Peace.
MI5: Political Correctness is compromising National Security
Using MI5 for political purposes due to Political Correctness is an absurdity. The damming report that came to light today about the fact that the Security Services failed to protect members of the public because they did not track down the Muslim Terrorist that killed scores of innocent people at a public arena in Manchester says it all. Dame Stella Rimington spoke loudly and clearly about the fact that the Security Services do not have the manpower necessary to follow every lead and track down every Muslim Terrorist in the United Kingdom.
Why then using MI5 for the purposes of political persecution and harassment against individuals who are not a terrorist threat? Well, you need to read the pages of Hope Not Hate, UAF and some pages of so called mainstream newspapers where individuals like Lizzie Dearden divert attention from the real threats by constantly attacking individuals who are not a terrorist threat but are classified as a terrorist threat because it serves the purposes of malign left-wing journalists and malign left-wing and liberal politicians.
If because of left-wing mental retards the Security Services are forced to divert resources away from where they are really needed then you have to conclude that people like Lizzie Dearden and others are promoting terrorism and have blood in their hands when stressed Security Services cannot track down the real threats.
Legislation meant to be used to tackle Muslim Terrorism is now being used to persecute and/or harass and/or imprison British Nationalists who campaign against the Islamic Terrorist Threat as Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and other know very well because of their own experiences.
Is Tommy Robinson a Security Threat? No, he isn't. Is Paul Golding a Security Threat? No, he isn't. Is Jayda Fransen a Security Threat? No, she isn't. In spite of this, they are constantly persecuted, defamed and subjected to all kinds of ill treatment.
As long as Political Correctness is the driving force behind many of the actions undertaken by Security Services, the lives of ordinary Britons will be in danger and as it happened in Manchester lives will be lost. Left-Wing Journalism has become a disease. Left-Wing Journalism has made itself a National Security Threat.
National Action infiltrated British Armed Forces under Amber Rudd's Watch as Home Secretary
The news that elements of National Action infiltrated the British Armed Forces is actually no news at all. For a very long time, elements of the British Armed Forces have been training British para-military groups in several locations in the United Kingdom.
When you have an individual like Amber Rudd in charge you can expect a lot worse to happen. She was incompetent as Home Secretary and this is why she was forced to resign.Why putting Amber Rudd back again in the Cabinet? Because of desperation. She banned National Action. So what? Did she expect that those involved in National Action would be deterred by her legal action? Did she really think that banning National Action things were going to go back to what they were before?
Nothing happens in the lower ranks of any military organisation without the knowledge of the Middle Ranks and this raises very serious questions. To what extent Junior Military Officers respond to National Action? They are armed and they have what it takes. The high ranks of the Chilean Army were oblivious to the designs of General Augusto Pinochet until the very last minute and I suspect that something very similar is happening within the British Armed Forces. The Political Establishment didn't have a clue. Allende was a sitting duck and his top Generals were totally unaware of what was coming. Parliament was easily wiped out because the reality is that Politicians have no real power and if there is a coup most politicians would be running for cover. The mass media operators would follow because they wouldn't want to be shot down. What would happen? The mass media would very quickly 'join in' and seek 'an accommodation deal' to continue to operate.
Those of us who lived through a military coup and dictatorship know how things develop and I am seeing the tell tale signs of things to come. What individuals like Amber Rudd did was to push people underground thus making them a lot more dangerous. They don't need a name to continue to operate. You need a name if you are a political organisation including a political party willing to stand in elections. Elements of National Action don't want to stand in elections and anonymity is one of their best assets. All National Action is to place sympathetic elements within structures of power and this includes the Armed Forces. They will have people working within the Police and other strategic organisations.
Why the Establishment keeps pestering and targeting individuals like Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen? Because they are publicly known and easily targeted. How do you target people whose existence you are not aware of? You don't because you cannot. They are invisible. They could be standing next to you and you wouldn't be aware of what they are planning to do. I guess Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi paid the ultimate price because of their lack of awareness and the Political Establishment could be about to learn a very harsh lesson and they should be thinking about Jo Cox MP. Did her position as Member of Parliament save her life?
The heads of the British Armed Forces have lost the plot very much like the British mass media and the political establishment.
To define Tommy Robinson as Far Right is an absurdity. Far Right is an ideological label and nothing of what Tommy Robinson says is ideological but, as usual, anybody who stands for Britain ends up being called Nazi, Fascist, Racist, Xenophobe and who knows what else.
We learnt that the boy soldier that took the picture is going to be thrown out of the Armed Forces. Yet another absurdity. The boys in the picture are the ones who are going to end up dead fighting for Britain and they are treated like rubbish when they are soldiers and will be treated like rubbish when they end up homeless and/or mentally ill and/or disabled while the ones they fight against - the followers of the Religion of Peace - get older cashing in from the exploitation of the cash cows some call wives and the children they bring into the world.
A statement issued by the Armed Forces indicates that 'they would not tolerate Far Right supporters' and 'Far Right supporters would not be allowed to serve'. My message to the bosses of the Armed Forces involved in this charade is 'you are barking at the wrong tree'. Who would be allowed to serve - if they wanted to serve? The killers of Lee Rigby? The one who killed PC Keith Palmer while one of PC Keith Palmer's bosses was hiding inside his car like a fucking coward? Do the bosses of the Armed Forces really think that the followers of the Religion of Peace will stand up for Britain?
How many Multicultural individuals are there standing in the picture? None. Why? Because the reality of the British Armed Forces is that the vast majority of those who are going to be sent out to die are white British boys and girls. You children are sent out to die to make space so that the scum of the Religion of Peace live happily ever after at the expense of British taxpayers.
How much money and how many resources, are being spent to keep Britain safe simply because the scum of the Religion of Peace is roaming around without a care in the world? There was a time when the corpses of British soldiers were paraded on the streets so that the British public could honour the fallen. Not anymore. With every passing day, the words 'We shall remember them' sound increasingly worthless and meaningless.
Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!
The Windrush Scandal brought Amber Rudd down but her incompetence was shown long before. I knew Jack Renshaw and many of those accused of being members of National Action. None of them would be capable of any acts of terrorism. The whole thing has been a shameful circus for political posturing.
About 85% of inmates in British jails are Muslim. What does this tell you about what is going on? Then came the reports that more whites are being arrested and charged with terrorism. Why? Because they had to use Police Forces to show that they were not being unduly harsh with Muslim criminals. The fact of the matter remains that all those murdered in terrorists acts in the United Kingdom have been killed by Muslim criminals or Muslim converts. Lee Rigby was killed by Muslim converts. A Police Officer was slaughtered in Westminster stabbed by a Muslim convert. Not a single person has been killed by a white terrorists because there are no white terrorists.
Liberals and Marxists want to justify their ideological stances by blaming innocent whites and pursue their campaign of ethnic cleansing that is destroying Europe. ethnic cleansing that will lead to war and to the disintegration of democratic institutions that has taken centuries to forge.
It took centuries for women to be able to vote. Muslims treat women as slaves or at best as second or third class individuals. Many of them believe that they have to deliberately damage women's bodies with the so called Female Genital Mutilation or that they have to be hidden, covered with bed clothing when they walk on the streets. An Asian Lady Peer denounced that Muslim men were importing women to use them as cash cows by exploiting the welfare state by claiming benefits for children of several wives.
Many Muslims believe and they speak openly about it that women only exist to pleasure men. The promise of tens of virgins to deliver sexual pleasures to those who blow up themselves for Allah more than proves the extraordinary disregard for women to be seen not as wives and mothers but as objects to be exploited. They not even respect their own daughters to the point that for ages there have been ongoing investigations about forced marriages and about girls that have been killed or have had to escape, to run away from their families, because they felt that their lives were in danger. This is the Islam, the so called culture, that Liberals and Marxists want to impose on us.
For more than sixteen years, Police and Politicians looked the other way while thousands of vulnerable children were raped and drugged by Muslim gangs and those raising the alert were accused of racism. Instead of protecting vulnerable children, for the said Police Officers and Politicians it was more important to protect their positions at the expense of vulnerable children and they wilfully protected Muslim criminals.
The rage against Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, against Nick Griffin and others is that they not only denounced Muslim depravity and terrorism. They have actively campaigned against Muslim depravity and Muslim Terrorism. The Security Services themselves say on a regular basis that they are quashing terror attempt after terror attempt of Muslim Terrorists and when they failed to do so people died. Lee Rigby was beheaded by people that the Security Services were trying to recruit. They couldn't foil attacks in London and Manchester and people died. We have Hate Priests using public spaces, Mosques and Cultural Centres to spread hatred against Non Muslims. Not only that. We have jails being used to promote Muslim Terrorism.
The real terrorists have not been members of organisations like National Action. The real terrorists have been supported by Liberals and Marxists.
The icing on the cake was Amber Rudd's actions during the Windrush Scandal. She deliberately lied to Parliament about the immigration shambles in which documents were destroyed and families who came to Britain in good faith have been made to suffer. Whether dealing with Terrorism or dealing immigration, Amber Rudd was not fit for purpose and now she is trying to rock the boat to ignore the will of the British People that in a democratic exercise decided to leave the European Union.
Look at the conditions for release. Is this really Britain? Once thing is certain: when this happens Great Britain is gone and we are left with 'britain' with small letters. It is as shameful as it is dangerous. But right now, doesn't surprise me in a country in which a man was convicted in Scotland for teaching his girlfriend's dog to raise a leg. If you ask the right questions about issues that really matter you risk being sent to jail or worse.
What do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson have in common?
For more than 16 years, children were being raped in places like Rotherham and other British cities and so called mainstream political parties and Police were doing practically absolutely nothing to protect those being abused because they were afraid of being accused of racism.
Organisations that were supposed to protect vulnerable children looked the other way and rape gangs could do their dirty business unmolested. They were so confident than in some cases taxi services were used to transport children to places where gangs plied them with alcohol and drugs and gang raped them.
When a well-known Far Right leader spoke to the BBC, the BBC accused him of being racist for daring to raise the issue that is today widespread news and not long after the BBC itself was rocked by a scandal involving well-known entertainers that even used BBC facilities to carry out sexual activities with minors.
Now, what do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson have in common? All of them have spoken openly about Muslim rape gangs and against Muslim terrorism while British authorities have indicated that they are actively working to prevent Muslim terrorist attacks.
Police authorities and Anti-Terrorism organisations within the Security Services did not prevent what happened on July 7, 2005. They did not prevent either the beheading of a British soldier close to military headquarters in London. They knew the to-be culprits long before they perpetrated attacks that left more than 50 dead and many more injured. They even tried to recruit the killers of Lee Rigby.
What do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson also have in common? They have been arrested, trialed and convicted. We have come to the point that more Police resources are being used against those who denounce crime. This is certainly a paradox when Police representatives have gone as far as asking parents to denounce their children and teachers to denounce pupils if there is any suspicion regarding their involvement in terrorist activities. Needless to say, it is a monstrosity to ask parents to denounce their own children and it is also a monstrosity to ask teachers to denounce their own pupils.
But this is just part of the picture. Even a joke, something done merely as a joke, without intent to cause damage and without hatred, can land anybody in serious trouble in a legal system in which courts are eager to prosecute and convict those accused to appease or gratify vested interests. When this happens, Justice goes out through the window and a Totalitarian State is born.
There are also attempts to censor people who use social media and threats have been made against social media providers. Power and control, repression, persecution, demonizing, prosecution and incarceration are now the rule rather than the exception in an environment that is increasingly unstable in a very fragmented British political and social reality.
In the meantime, the number of victims of stabbing and gun crime keeps rising. Whether it is about issues involving Jews, Muslims or people leaving on the fringes of society, the country is in a state of flux. Add to this the complications arising from political issues and geopolitical issues and you get an explosive mix. I haven't included factors related to an economic reality in which people find themselves in ever more difficult financial circumstances that lead to dysfunctional families and mental and physical health problems.
This is not a very optimistic description of what is happening in Britain but even less optimistic events will follow sooner than later that could put an end to the United Kingdom as we know it. The man that some say could be the next British Prime Minister favors what some call a 'United Ireland', knowing the implications of supporting such a move.
Therefore, wherever you look you can see impending crisis. If you criticize a Jew or a Muslim, somebody would be offended and you could end up in court and facing jail. But if you support murdering babies, the mass media will rejoice and you could become a celebrity. People in the Republic of Ireland voted in favour of the Babies Holocaust.
The release conditions imposed by British Police against Paul Golding, Britain First Leader, are draconian to say the least. Much needs to be known about how Jayda Fransen has been treated. I have to confess that this is the first time I see such conditions imposed in Britain and they are more severe than the conditions for release imposed by Military Dictatorships in Latin America. After all, in Latin America, when you were released you were a free man without limitations. Not so in Britain, where Police Authorities have become Political Police.
Listening to Britain First you understand that there are quite a few nutters in the House of Commons.
Having seen the twits and having heard what the Prime Minister Theresa May said, what Home Secretary Amber Rudd said, what an SNP MP said and what Labour Party MPs including Yvette Cooper said in the House of Commons, I conclude that the House of Commons is inhabited by quite a few nutters who don't have a clue about what they are talking about. Prime Minister Theresa May - once again - made a fool of herself publicly telling what US President Donald Trump can say or cannot say. After a disastrous election called in a rush, Theresa May is still driven to make silly statements for the sake of very misguided Political Correctness. She accused President Donald Trump of showing what is really going on and she completely forgot to condemn the real perpetrators.
About Yvette Cooper MP I don't hold any hopes. She historically supported an illegal invasion that killed thousands of Iraqis and led to a massive exodus that some say was the trigger for the mess the Middle East Region has become. Her good judgement has gone missing more than once. With regards to SNP, I must say that they promised a false independence for Scotland and their sole role has become to create as many problems as possible for the country as a whole as some kind of retaliation when they didn't get their pseudo independence.
I went to listen to Britain First. I was there from beginning to end of a conference during which Paul Golding as Leader and Jayda Fransen as Deputy Leader explained very clearly their political aims. Not a word of Racism. Not a word of Fascism. What they both said had nothing to do with Racism and had nothing to do with Fascism proving that Members of the House of Commons including the British Prime Minister Theresa May and Home Secretary Amber Rudd have been lying to the British People by totally misrepresenting and falsely accusing the Leadership of Britain First.
The behaviour of several Members of Parliament and of Members of the British Government has been absolutely shameful and degrading. As if we didn't have enough with expenses fraud and improper sexual behaviour, Members of Parliament regularly misrepresent, falsely accuse and demonise fellow British Citizens.
