Tommy Robinson: Manipulation is the art of having somebody do what you want without getting publicly involved

Message sent to a Zionist organisation in London and referred to Members of Parliament including members of the British government, the Opposition, the Muslim Council of Britain and mass media including Lizzie Dearden, writer for The Independent thas has been involved in reporting about Tommy Robinson, and also sent to the Metropolitan Police in London that been repeatedly involved in actions involving public rallies and demonstrations and the courts. 

"Dear Sir/Madam,

Tommy Robinson standing on an IDF tank is Israel and then they tell you that he is not one of them. Ah, look! He is holding a gun. How many non-Jews would be allowed to hold a war gun standing on an IDF tank in Israel? What you tell us in London goes against factual information. At every rally, there have been Zionists supporting Tommy Robinson and his anti-Muslim messages.  During his courts trials, Zionists have been very visible supporting Tommy Robinson and Israeli flags have accompanied every single rally in support of Tommy Robinson. Those organising and supporting Tommy Robinson’s rallies at the highest level are Jewish: Israeli Jews and non-Israeli Jews.

Perhaps you could come up with a coherent, consistent and plausible explanation. I copy this message to the Muslim Council of Britain. I reckon they also deserve an explanation.

Perhaps you can also offer an explanation to the Metropolitan Police and to other Police forces in the UK that have spent a huge amount of resources policing rallies that you supported while promoting animosity against Muslims in the United Kingdom.

You throw a rock, you hide your hands behind your back and claim to be innocent.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen"

Undoubtedly, members of the public have been taken for a ride for a very long time and offered images that don't fit in with the narrative of certain organisations that use public perception for their own ends, ends that have little to do with their declared aims.

It is no coincidence that at a time when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that fully supports the Israeli Far Right is involved in pushing forward the agenda of a Greater Israel using ethnic cleansing to throw out Palestinians from the occupied territories, Zionist organisations are publicly attempting to distance themselves from individuals that have been useful to their cause. 

This happens also a time when more and more Jews are turning against Benjamin Netanyahu that has been visibly unable to win an outright majority in Israel and remain in power as a caretaker Prime Minister.

There is also the fact that as Prime Minister he has protection against the charges made against him by the Israeli Judiciary for serious cases of fraud in which his own wife is also signalled as being involved. Therefore the importance of fuelling the ongoing conflict producing killings and destruction is twofold: conflict and murder keep Benjamin Netanyahu in power and by the same token allows him to carry on with his agenda of ethnic cleansing.

Rachel Shabi, Jewish writer writing on The Independent, London, England, United Kingdom:  

As we count the toll and name the dead, the bloody, grinding narrative of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has switched from “simmering tensions” to “escalating violence”. Everyday violence is now part of Jerusalem life. You sense it when Palestinian residents of this holy city, treated with animosity and suspicion, are deafened by the maddening hum of Israeli surveillance helicopters, when they face routine stop-and-searches and arrests by border police and often violent harassment from Jewish settlers. It’s there in the increasing presence of those settlers, not just in the expanding group of settlements that ring Jerusalem, but also in Palestinian neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem and the Old City. It’s there in the hate mobs and the chants of “death to Arabs” that spill on to the city’s streets.

In the absence of a political framework, it’s inevitable that these “simmering tensions” will spasmodically escalate. For where else can the anger and unresolved disputes go if there are no political channels through which to mediate?

Political vacuums are opportunistically filled by extremists. In Jerusalem, hardline Jewish national-religious settler groups have taken their fight from the West Bank to the city’s holy sites. Temple Mount, or Haram al-Sharif – the beautiful walled compound in the Old City that is sacred to Jews and Muslims – has long functioned according to status quo agreements. Under these, Jews can visit but not pray at the sacred site, while the Western Wall, just underneath, is reserved for Jewish prayer. But in recent years, movements calling for Jewish prayer rights have repeatedly flouted the codes, causing tensions and disturbances at the compound.

To be clear, this is not a religious coexistence campaign; Jewish religious leaders have for centuries ruled against Jewish prayer at Temple Mount. Indeed, the aims of the settler-led movement for additional worshipping rights become more transparent when you hear how they want to destroy the Dome of the Rock and replace it with a third Jewish Temple.

This would be bad enough in itself, but such extremist national-religious groups, once fringe and marginal, are now powerful and mainstream, partly because they are supported and funded by the current, settler-endorsing Israeli coalition.

Rachel Shabi perfectly describes what is going on. Power in Israel has been taken over by Jewish Far Right Extremists, Far Right Extremists supported by Zionist branches across the world, the kind of people that support Tommy Robinson because what Tommy Robinson is doing in the United Kingdom is no different from what Zionists are doing in Israel and in the occupied territories. It is plainly obvious that they want to publicly distance themselves from Tommy Robinson for the sake of keeping appearances since Tommy Robinson has been defined as British Far Right and has a political past as former member of the British National Party and founder of other parapolitical movements. 

Organisations like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters also have a pro-Zionist narrative and include  as members former members of the British National Party and this goes to show that when they are useful to promote messages supporting aggression in the occupied territories they are conveniently used. When they don't need to use them they call the said individuals Nazi, Fascist, Terrorist and the like.  

Why Anti-Semitism activists are working together with the British Far Right?

 

Paul Besser and outspoken anti-Semitism activists 

Anti-Semitism campaigners in the United Kingdom appear to be working together with elements of the British Far Right and they appear to have a common interest in terms of going against Muslims and Pro-Palestine campaigners.

Paul Besser has been seen with Paul (former British National Party activist and organiser and present leader of Britain First) and with Jayda Fransen (formerly Britain First Deputy Leader and now involved in the leadership of the British Freedom Party due to stand in elections in Scotland to challenge Nicola Sturgeon for a seat in the Scottish Parliament).  

It can be said that Anti-Semitism campaigners are very close to Tommy Robinson (Stuart Lennox) and have been involved in campaigning for Tommy Robinson and have participated in rallies supporting Tommy Robinson. Anti-Semitism campaigners have also been involved with Anne Marie Waters (leader of For Britain) that also has an anti-Muslim narrative and has supporters that usually attend rallies, supporting Israel and are not favourable to the cause of Palestine. Former members of National Front and British National Party have publicly joined Anne Marie Waters. It must be said that Anne Marie Waters is a former member of UKIP that became disassocited from UKIP because of her views on Islam.

We know from the media (i.e. The Independent newspaper online) that there have been reports of threats made by Tommy Robinson against journalist like Lizzie Dearden that constantly classify Tommy Robinson as Far Right activist.

All three - Tommy Robinson (former BNP), Paul Golding (former BNP) and Jayda Fransen (former BNP and now associated with Nick Griffin (former BNP Leader) and Jim Dowson (former financial supporter of the BNP and founder of Britain First), have been convicted for incidents against Muslims in the United Kingdom. The question to ask is: are pro-Israel and anti-Semitism activists in the United Kingdom actively cooperating with the British Far Right to go against Muslims and those who support the cause of Palestine?

Tommy Robinson - Pro-Israel and anti-Islam

The links are apparently everywhere. It looks like some media are playing both sides at the same time. On the one hand they condemn Far Right activists for engaging in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, but they don't seem to want to talk about the obvious marriage of convenience between some anti-Semitism activists and the Far Right engaged in campaigns against Muslims in the United Kingdom.

Many politicians and many in the mass media are being less than honest by talking about issues when it suits their agenda and looking the other way when it doesn't suit their agenda.

Paul Besser and Jayda Fransen

Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters

The tragedy of so called British Nationalism is that some of those portraying themselves as British Nationalists are driven by arguments that have little to do with promoting British interests. Confusing arguments born out of desperation in an attempt to be politically meaningful.

In a conversation I had with Anne Marie Waters, the key issue was that meetings organised by Anne Marie Waters and those linked to Anne Marie Waters kept being cancelled or rejected indicating that those who own venues or manage venues don't wish to be associated with Anne Marie Waters.

In politics, perception is critically important. For Britan, has incorporated elements of the British National Party that were associated with the very same ideas that Anne Marie Waters says that she rejects. None other than Julian Leppert was elected Councillor representing the British National Party and now he represents For Britain as Councillor - their only Councillor.

It appears that Anne Marie Waters hasn't done her research properly. In a desperate attempt to build a power base, she has incorporated members of the Far Right that were and are directly linked to the very same things that she talks against. 

Here, Anne Marie Waters appears surrounded by prominent figures of the British National Party, including Eddy Butler, the mastermind of the British National Party electoral success in Barking and Dagenham that got 12 Councillor elected and one of the British National Party stalwarts that got Richard Barnbrook elected as Member of the London Assembly. She might persuade those who are not aware of the political background of her core supporters. I don't think that Anne Marie Waters is a naive individual. I think that she is being disingenous.

The comment made by a well-known political activist was 'I think that she was very badly advised to make a video attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative'. Mark Collett was also a prominent British National Party member.

Jeffrey Marshall, also a prominent British Party member, posed as a friend of Jewish Communities. Here he was at a Synagogue, wearing a yamaka and taking part in a religious ceremony.   

Most of the core members of For Britain, including the only elected representative (Julian Leppert), have one thing is common. They are all former members of the British National Party. What led Anne Marie Waters to publish a video directly attacking Patriotic Alternative? 

The British National Party is everywhere. It is in For Britain, in Patriotic Alternative and in Britain First as Paul Golding was also a prominent member of the British National Party. Many of those supporting Tommy Robinson - including Tommy Robinson himself - can be traced back to the British National party. In fact, For Britain and several other groups are the direct consequence of the fragmentation of the British National Party that went though a similar process as the National Front from which it derived.

Here you see Tommy Robinson at a British National Party meeting listening to Richard Edmonds. Was Tommy Robinson unaware of the ideas of Richard Edmonds who was a vital link with National Front? I have met Tommy Robinson quite a few times. I don't think that Tommy Robinson was or is a naive individual. He left the BNP and went on to join the English Defense League that is fervently anti-Islam. In 2013, he left the English Defense League, criticized EDL, but took over its anti-Islam platform that he shares with Anne Marie Waters.

In fact, all groups that came out of the British National Party and the British National Party itself share the anti-Islam platform. Fragmentation was not the consequence of ideological differences. Fragmentation was very much the consequence of personalities and internal feuds.

At practically all rallies in support of Tommy Robinson or Anne Marie Waters, you see Israeli flags. This would lead some operators to think that Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters are supporters of Zionists and of the State of Israel. Are they? How much do Jewish Communities actually support Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters?

In the muddy world of British politics, it is difficult to know who stands for what. This is why, regardless of any statements of Anne Marie Waters - as long as much of her power base is directly traceable to the British National Party - her attempts to disassociate herself from certain political platforms will not change public perception. 

Today, Britain is very much focused on the tragedy generated by Corona Virus. Most people don't have the time nor the inclination to engage in profound political analysis and the days in which so many are losing their lives do not seem to be the proper time to discuss certain political issues. When the present health crisis is hopefully over, I believe that Britain will be in many ways a different country.

To rebuild Britain, we will need real politicians working together for the common good. Those existing on the fringes of British politics, driven by personality feuds and empty slogans will be as irrelevant as ever before.

Nigel Farage says bye bye to UKIP

Nigel Farage says bye bye to UKIP

Tommy Robinson pushes Nigel Farage out of UKIP. Although this statement might not be accurate in terms of what actually happened the end result is exactly the same. 

Unless Arron Banks has the will to create a new political force with Nigel Farage in it, the future looks uncertain from a political point of view. March 29, 2019 is also the political end of Nigel Farage as Member of the European Parliament. Without a seat in the European Parliament, without a political party to belong to, Nigel Farage will just Nigel Farage the LBC radio presenter, but for how long?

The same goes for many other politicians of other political parties that will have to redefine what will be their daily routine. Back to business and most probably out of politics for good. Accusing UKIP of having become BNP because of having Tommy Robinson as an adviser was a very low point for Nigel Farage, especially looking at UKIP's membership criteria that are more stringent that the membership criteria of all other political parties. The Conservative Party has former BNP members. The Labour Party has former BNP members. UKIP was targeted by the Political Establishment and the mass media that put UKIP on the spot while forgetting that other political parties' requirements didn't exclude former BNP members.

Now For Britain Leader Anne Marie Waters was a member of UKIP and For Britain has former BNP members. No problems there. So all the talk about Extremists and Fascists doesn't apply. The use of the labels Extremist and Fascist is merely a tool to discriminate against political opponents and such labels are not representative of political reality.

If Nigel Farage didn't want Tommy Robinson to become an adviser working for UKIP, why did Nigel Farage walk away when he was UKIP Leader? If he had stayed as Leader he would have ensured that Tommy Robinson could not become an adviser working for UKIP. 

You don't strive to get Britain out of the European Union to then transform Britain into an Islamic Republic.   

Tommy Robinson Far Right? Mmmmm..... No.

Tommy Robinson Far Right? Mmmm..... No.

The heads of the British Armed Forces have lost the plot very much like the British mass media and the political establishment.

To define Tommy Robinson as Far Right is an absurdity. Far Right is an ideological label and nothing of what Tommy Robinson says is ideological but, as usual, anybody who stands for Britain ends up being called Nazi, Fascist, Racist, Xenophobe and who knows what else.

We learnt that the boy soldier that took the picture is going to be thrown out of the Armed Forces. Yet another absurdity. The boys in the picture are the ones who are going to end up dead fighting for Britain and they are treated like rubbish when they are soldiers and will be treated like rubbish when they end up homeless and/or mentally ill and/or disabled while the ones they fight against - the followers of the Religion of Peace - get older cashing in from the exploitation of the cash cows some call wives and the children they bring into the world.

A statement issued by the Armed Forces indicates that 'they would not tolerate Far Right supporters' and 'Far Right supporters would not be allowed to serve'. My message to the bosses of the Armed Forces involved in this charade is 'you are barking at the wrong tree'. Who would be allowed to serve - if they wanted to serve? The killers of Lee Rigby? The one who killed PC Keith Palmer while one  of PC Keith Palmer's bosses was hiding inside his car like a fucking coward? Do the bosses of the Armed Forces really think that the followers of the Religion of Peace will stand up for Britain?

How many Multicultural individuals are there standing in the picture? None. Why? Because the reality of the British Armed Forces is that the vast majority of those who are going to be sent out to die are white British boys and girls. You children are sent out to die to make space so that the scum of the Religion of Peace live happily ever after at the expense of British taxpayers.

How much money and how many resources, are being spent to keep Britain safe simply because the scum of the Religion of Peace is roaming around without a care in the world? There was a time when the corpses of British soldiers were paraded on the streets so that the British public could honour the fallen. Not anymore. With every passing day, the words 'We shall remember them' sound increasingly worthless and meaningless.   

 

Tommy Robinson is neither Far Right nor Racist

Tommy Robinson is neither Far Right nor Racist

Lizzie Dearden - as a well as whole array of politicians and mass media operators - have falsely accused Tommy Robinson of being Far Right and/or Racist. Why? What are the foundations for such labels? There are no foundations whatsoever. Why is this happening? Because politicians and mass media operators can get away with murder. It is about power without responsibility. 

If you challenge the BBC or private mass media you face a wall. For example, the BBC is judge, jury and prosecutor of its behaviour unless they are challenged by some people with power and financial muscle. Otherwise, the BBC can do whatever. It can destroy innocent people who don't have the power to defend themselves and BBC reporters get away with crime as it is criminal to demonise people who don't have the power to protect themselves.

If try to complain to the board that deals with excesses committed by private mass media, the said board will tell you that they can only deal with mass media that are signatories of a Code of Conduct and only as long as the said Code of Conduct refers to the kind of crime being committed.

To sum up, if you are not powerful both in terms of influence or of financial muscle you don't stand a chance to get a fair hearing. This is execution by power without responsibility.

When the killing of journalists begins, irresponsible journalists will have only themselves to blame. A Member of Parliament already lost their life and many more will follow if the present trend to defame, libel, distort and misrepresent other people goes on.

Britain has changed. Europe has changed. Public anger is growing rapidly and the time will come when no Police Force, no Armed Forces, will be able to prevent a social and political explosion.

Jo Cox MP was embarked in a witch-hunt and this is why she was killed. Many swore to follow the same path and might face the same fate. Demonising innocent people is a boomerang that will come and haunt you and your family. This is a crucial time in the history of Britain and in the history of Europe. Demonising must stop. Labelling must stop. Defaming must stop. Libelling must stop. Distortion must stop.

Freedom of Speech in danger

Political repression at its worst. When people are not allowed to speak freely, people will kill because violence will be the only way to get back rights that are being destroyed by Political Correctness. It happened before and it will happen again. Liberal and Marxists are making extremely serious mistakes.

Repression is a dam that sooner than later will burst with disastrous consequences.

Nigel Farage's contradictions: one thing in UK and another in Germany

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Gpfmiv0Vc

Anne Marie Waters - a very clear message from a very concise and crystal clear politician. Whether she is given the reins of UKIP or not, the fact remains that she tells things as she feels.

Listening to LBC, you might believe that when you listen to Nigel Farage you are listening to two different people. Just this week, Nigel Farage complained that the mass media, the political establishment, and some members of the general public had created a climate of fear that led UKIP supports to hide their views for fear of being excluded, discriminated against, fired from jobs, not hired, or even physically attacked. In fact, Nigel Farage himself spoke about being afraid of leaving his family home because there was a constant threat against his life.

When I look at UKIP's website, I find that there is list of people whose only crime has been to have been at some point in time members of other political organisations and are therefore banned from becoming members of UKIP.

Therefore, UKIP is banning people who have committed no crime while at the same time complaining that UKIP supporters live in fear of being excluded, persecuted or even attacked. This is a lamentable contradiction in terms that Nigel Farage has not rationally justified or explained, and especially when a few days ago Nigel Farage gave his support to Alternative für Deutschland and spoke at one of AfD rallies in Berlin, at the Spandau Citadel, days before an election that gave AfD tens of seats in the Bundestag.

Nigel Farage opposes Anne Marie Waters in the United Kingdom and then supports a political party in Germany that says very much what Anne Marie Waters is saying the United Kingdom. You couldn't make it up.