UK: Police Incompetence is making matters a lot worse and fuelling hatred

A Sikh man stabbed a white man using a ceremonial dagger and claimed that he was the victim of a racial attack. In fact, it was exactly the opposite and as it came up the Sikh man was the attacker, but politically correct Police believe his version of events and failed to look after a white man that had been stabbed. The victim told Police that he had been stabbed and Police ignored him. Without medical care, the young white male died in Police custody.

This represents everything that is wrong in Britain when it comes to decisions made by brainwashed Police forces that fail in their duty of care.

Not long ago the news came to the surface that Police forces had been involved during more than 16 years in a cover up that left an undetermined number of youngsters, in several cities, to be gangraped, drugged and even murdered by gangs mainly of Pakistani origin that systematically carried out attacks as some sort of religious revenge against British children.

Police failed to act because "they were afraid of being accused of racism". There is a clear pattern and such pattern is now leading to increasing tensions between communities in an environment in which innocent members of all communities are in danger.

Instead of focusing on changing Police mentality, political operators - including the government - are promoting violence and more confrontation.

Crime is crime, no matter who commits the crime, but in Britain what we call justice is not justice as it should be. Justice has become politizised. 

Britain is a country of ghettos and this ghetto reality is a gigantic national security failure. If during peacetime this is happening, I wonder what will happen during wartime. Total chaos. If Britain were at war, Britain would burn from within.

Conservative Party: 40,000 teachers left the profession. NHS is bleeding professionals that are leaving even for other countries

Conservative Party is in a crisis with MPs no longer willing to stand for re-election and even members of the Cabinet announcing that they will not be standing for re-election. In the meantime, problems are being piled up at all levels. 

In education, more than 40,000 teachers are no longer teaching. They have had more than enough. When asked, a school teacher said 'I could not take it any more. It was not just about 35 pupils in the classroom. It was also about dealing with children with mental health issues that made teaching impossible.' It is not about remuneration. It is about working conditions. Teacher are supposed to teach. They are not supposed to deal with psychiatric problems thrown in the classroom.

What has changed about the operation of Police stations in the UK. Politicians including Prime Minister Rishi Sunak make promises in the House of Commons that he really and truly knows that cannot be delivered. Police stations are not even receiving reports regarding property stolen, let alone theft of mobile phones. They are understaff and they don't have the resources to deal with that kind of crime.

How much times does a consultant in the NHS have to deal with patients? Not much. There are not enough consultants and not enough specialised staff. There is so much that can be done with lack of human resources and with lack of equipment.

And what happens in Job Centres? Unqualified staff and insufficient staff are leading to DWP staff quitting their jobs because they cannot deal with the workload they are forced to deal with. 

And what happens at the Home Office? Not enough staff to deal with mountains of applications and the natural consequence is that everything gets delayed and this has social consequences. A rising number of people are wandering around in limbo and more often than not local authorities, schools and social services have to deal with the outcome having to find non existing accommodation for families with children, many of which are facing mental health problems and situations of abuse including domestic violence.

This is a tale of massive government incompetence. Government secretaries of state and ministers spend an awful amount of time making political statements and seem absolutely oblivious to reality. What is the point of spending millions of Pound every ten years to carry out Censuses? Save the money spent on Censuses and spend it to really try to solve the myriad of problems Britain is facing. Whatever data can be gathered in censuses are completely unreliable.

You will never be able to keep up with inflation when trying to support families via the welfare state. Look at the cost of buying and look at the cost of renting. Private renting is a total waste of resources. The private market is not supposed to meet the needs of those in need. Private letting is a business. What is needed is the sort of letting that can be controlled by the state. If you have social housing, the monies can be kept by the state and re-invested in social services. Private renting should be left for those who can afford to rent without state support. The state should be both landlord and service provider.

Do you know what happens to families with children that are forced to be constantly on the move from one area to another, from one city to another? Do you know what happens when it comes to education, health, work, family cohesion and mental health? Instability, uncertainty, mental health problems, domestic violence, constant financial struggle and dependency and the list goes on.

 

Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist who hated plastics - Irony and reality

 

Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist who hated plastics

The Führer Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist that stuck to traditional building materials and hated plastics. He was a very practical man that thought that quality was better than quantity. In fact, he strived to improve demographic standards by getting rid of faulty people that had become a burden for the rest of society.

"If you are not fit for purpose, my dear, you should not exist." Overcroding in prisons? Mentally and/or physically challenged? Homosexuals? Alcoholics? No way. Get rid of the lot of them and you will have a stronger people.

Whatever your views, you must recognize the fact that if people are healthy, fit and able to be productive you will have a stronger people and stronger country. Men passing for women with painted nails, skirts and making funny voices? To the wall. Women behaving like men and disregarding their role as women and creators of life? To the wall. Multiculturalism? Diversity? What is that? Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer and rabbits with rabbits and foxes with foxes. No funny business. 

Migrants crossing the Rhein to get into Germany without documents? Really? Use them as targetting practice to train the Wehrmacht. German Police kneeling down on the streets? Really? The one accommodation that they would get - if they got any - would be a cell controlled by the Geheime Staadtpolizei or other temporary accommodation before being put into warmer surroundings.

Look around any country of the so called civilized world? What do you see? 

For decades, people have celebrated the triumph over National Socialist Germany. What are they celebrating? Humanity lost the war. Look what Humanity is becoming. More than 8 billion people, most of which are mentally and/or physically challenged, corrupted by so called Progressive Ideology, seas full of plastic that we humans are eating everyday, a throwaway society that is poisoning the environment and destroying habits. My darlings, Humanity lost World War Two. The issue was not how many millions died. The issue has been how many bastards were left behind that should not have been left behind. We have quantity that is overpowering quality.

Do you know one thing that is growing? The number of inmates that leads to the building of more and more prisons. The almost totality of those who go to jail come out of jail to go back to jail. The number of families or women who are not fit for purpose procreating children that will follow the trends of depravity and despair grows at a steady pace. Dysfunctionality comes to mind. And we justify such trend with the words 'Human Rights'. The words Human Rights are used for many things as a justification for depravity and all kinds of abuses. Societies in crisis? I wonder why.

 

Bad governance leads to riots: if democracy is hopeless when trying to sort out problems, violence will follow

We are already seeing it on the streets. When Stop Oil protesters block a public way, drivers are losing patience and taking justice into their own hands. When Police officers stand aside and fail to do their duty, ordinary citizens will act given the absences and failures of local authorities.

There is nothing that could not happen if there is a social breakdown. On the pages of The Guardian we read acticles showing 'astonishment' about the numbers of those living on the streets. People have been living on the streets for many years and nobody seemed to take any notice of what has been happening. The actual heir to the throne - Prince William Windsor - has been walking around and talking about 'no more people sleeping rough'. Rent increases will see thousands of families and individuals facing the real prospect of living on the streets. So the numbers might not be going down, but actually going up as the financial crisis takes hold.

I don't think that in recent times we have seen anything like it. The most recent financial crisis don't come even close to what is going to happen if the economy goes downhill. There are reports indicating that landlords are selling properties that they used to rent. This is going to make the situation worse as places for renting disappear and rental costs go up thank to increased demand and lower supply.

Too much time is being devoted to gender and racial non issues and too little time is being spent trying to deal with crucially important issues. Migration should be a NO/NO. If anything, migration is making a bad situation a lot more explosive. If political parties continue to promote idelogical irrationality instead of dealing with pressing issues, battles will be fought on the streets as tempers flair.

Sooner than later, somebody is going to be run over and killed. After these events, Police forces have been forced to challenge Stop Oil protesters and other groups that are spreading chaos on British streets.

 

UK Elections: What for?

Who has real power? Elected representatives? the mass media? the trade unions?

When an MP, for whatever reason, falls from grace, what happens to democracy? Since the last General Election, and since other elections, we have seen Prime Ministers, Cabinet Ministers and other elected representatives exposed as either incompetent, corrupt or both. We can say as justification that those elected are as fallible and as vulnerable as anybody else, but we cannot avoid the consequences. Because they are constantly in the public domain and being talked about, their failings lead to lack of trust not just in them, but also lead to lack of trust in the democratic process.

This afternoon, a Police officer told me about his feeling about how the system to deal with mental health patients is not working and about how he encounters the same kind of situation on a daily basis. He said that having taken a mental health patient to an Accident and Emergency Department, the said patient usually ended up staying in the Accident and Emergency Department for more than 24 hours under police custody because he or she was not admitted into proper dedicated wards inside the hospital. He also told me about how patients are being discharged without proper treatment only to relapse to get involved being involved in life-threatening events. Departments meant to deal with mental health patients are over-capacity and tend to discharge patients before it is safe to do so. 

Now, this is a mental health issue, but it is also a political issue. One government after another, of all political colours, have failed to address the issue of what is done with mental health patients. We are dealing with mental health patients born and bred in the United Kingdom and we are dealing with people who arrive in the UK with mental health issues. We care more about dogs and cats than we care about people. We have more safeguards concerning dogs and cats, than we have safeguards concerning people. The recent Covid Pandemic is a perfect example. How long it took to close borders to present the spread of the disease? Were borders closed at all? On a daily basis we are admitting people who come into the country illegally and there are no safeguards regarding public health.

Even trust in Police forces is falling due to well-known incidents and this has been made worse by the fact that those in charge of Police forces have publicly stated that they don't have the tools to get rid of 'bad apples'. We know that there are individuals in uniform that are a certain liability when it comes to public safety and we accept it as fait accompli. We are supposed to elect representatives that will deal with these matters. So many failures tell you that democracy is not working. So much mismanagement and so many failures happen for a reason. Changing one political party for another will do nothing to change the core reasons that lead to such mismanagement and failures.There is something fundamentally wrong regarding the system itself.

Hope Not Hate, British Security Services and misguided politicians and political operators created National Action

 

Hope Not Hate, British Security Services and misguided politicians and political operators created National Action

Some people in this coutry surely disagreed or hated the British National Party and its then Leader Nick Griffin, but the BNP was standing for elections, getting elected representatives, playing by the rules, and by then there was not talk of any real threats or national security issues. 

In fact, there was a time when the BNP has many Counsellors elected, had a Member of the London Assembly Elected and two Members of the European Parliament. Therefore there was no appetite for any unfortunate adventures nor illegal activities. Everybody was playing by the book, but contratry to their names organisations like Hope Not Hate were busy spreading hate and promoting violence by trying to deprive voters of legitimate choices. Finally, the demise of the BNP thanks to do-gooders led to an environment in which individuals like Jack Renshaw, Mark Jones and others went the wrong way and in 2013 National Action was founded not to pursue or engage in legal political activities. They saw the demise of the BNP as living proof that it was no use to take part in legal political activities and this is why the name National Action. This refers to direct actions against those they saw as political enemies.

Years have passed but the same wrong strategies are in place and this includes using anti-terror legislation and in particular Schedule 7 for political purposes, detaining and harassing political operators or even blocking their personal back accounts and blocking party political bank accounts to presumably depriving political movements from the necessary resources that they use to stand in elections. Forced by a party political organisation called Electoral Commission - the Electoral Commission in violation of its remit is preventing political organisations from being registered as political parties and forcing their members to stand as independent candidates in every election where and when they can stand. 

The recent by election in Wakefield - called because of sexual misconduct of the Member of Parliament that represented the said constituency - is a clear example. Police forces were used for political purposes to detain, harass, and prevent political operators from engaging in the lawful business of standing in elections. The latest report indicates that thanks to Police actions bank accounts were frozen or closed down and all done for purposes of political persecution in the United Kingdom.

Just a few days ago at Walworth Police Station near Elephant and Castle in London, I had the opportunity to talk with two members of SO15 - I am always open to talk with members of the British Security Services - to give them advice about the errors of their ways and about how the troglodite measures of Police forces in the United Kingdom are actually promoting terrorism. Quite a few examples of such measures tell me that Security Services in the United Kingdom and this goes down to Police Forces in the United Kingdom are out of their depth and have very little understanding of what is actually happening.

Precisely because of the fact that Nationalist organisations are not being allowed to operate lawfully -  many are not even allowed to registered as political parties and on top of that when they stand independent candidates they suffered politically motivated arrests, harassment, have property seized and bank accounts frozen or closed down - there is the certain danger that individuals deprived of the right to take part in lawful political activities might suddenly decide to engage in other kinds of political activities and seek the support of external organisations or even foreign governments to achieve their aims. 

External organisations and foreign goverments can hit a pot of gold. As anybody rational and knowledgeable enough would understand, people can become national security assets not for Britain but for foreign organisations and foreign goverments. Security Services and the Armed Forces in Britain know that they have been infiltrated by political operators many of whom have strong support within the Security Services and within the Armed Forces. An article published by The Guardian attests to that but timidly refers - sometimes directly and sometimes indirectly to 'far right extremism within the Security Services and the Armed Forces'.

God help Britain if there is ever a war in Europe. There is every sign that Britain will be attacked from within. When it comes to politics and geopolitics, there are no national borders anymore and British Security Services, politicians and mass media can naively believe that blocking financial resources in the United Kingdom they will prevent well trained operators from doing whatever they set themselves to achieve. For example, financial resources can be transfered without registered bank accounts. Although British troops are not formally deployed in a theatre of war in Europe, the war is already taking place in many different forms and this is being reflected by economic realities. Does anybody understand that present economic uncertainties and political instability are caused by geopolitical decisions adopted by the British government? When you try to destabilize another country because of what is happening in Ukraine then you are bound to suffer the consequences and this is exactly what is happening. Sanctions and other measures adopted against the Russian Federation are backfiring in a big way and both Western Europe and Eastern Europe are feeling the brunt. 

What role will British Nationalists play? They have no reason to be loyal to a system that seeks to destroy them and in the process destroy Britain. Something very similar is happening in other European countries. In Germany, both industrialists and trade unions fear economic instability leading to political instability. In the Netherlands, we see different interest groups including those involved in transport sectors and farming taking action i.e. farmers acquiring water canons to counter-attack if attacked by Police forces. None other than the Dutch Vice President of the European Commission alerted about the certain danger of social unrest. Ladies and gentlemen, misguided geopolitical decisions and equally misguided environmental policies will lead Europe towards the 1930s. If Europe moves towards the 1930s, who do you think will benefit? And going back to Germany, will the Grünen in Germany be willing to put aside their aspirators if it becomes patently clear that we do need to use more fossil fuels to cope with present challenges? How long will Herr Olaf Scholz coalition last?

SO15, British Police forces, politicians and mass media need to understand that although geographically Britain might be a group of islands we cannot be in isolation in terms of economic, social and political developments happening right now in Europe. They must also understand that blocking individuals and preventing them from participating in lawful political activities they are creating an even greater danger in the United Kingdom.

Extinction Rebellion: yet more disruption as if we hadn't had enough disruption

Diane Abbott MP's participation during a LBC radio programme became legendary when having been asked how much money was going to be necessary to increase the number of Police officers she gave a figure that would have been the equivalent of spending £10 per Police officer.  

Since then, the Labour MP has complained that she has suffered torrents of abuse during her political career. When she was asked on radio, pressed for time, she gave a figure from the top of her head because she hadn't actually calculated beforehand how much it would be necessary to recruit Police officers that the Labour Party had been talking about for so long in Parliament and outside Parliament when criticizing Conservative governments past and present.

Policing rallies and demonstrations, enforcing Lockdown meaures and dealing with chaos and disorder while protecting public and private property does not come cheap. Police officers that would normally be carrying out regular duties have to be concentrated in big numbers on the streets to prevent public disorder and to deal with cases of violence when violence unavoidably erupts. Extra hours are piled up and all the monies invested in big deployments, arrests and legal proceedings consume even faster a very tight Police budget. As if the number of rallies and demonstrations we have been dealing with was not enough, the news kids on the block - Extinction Rebellion - are now threatening us with further actions and this time focusing on banking institutions. You can bet that, yet again, sizeable amounts of money will be taken out of the Police budget to prevent disorder and to deal with unavoidable confrontations on the streets. As we come out of the quarentine imposed to deal with a pandemic, and as numbers of peoples walking around rise, spring and summer don't look like seasons of the year that you will be able to enjoy, but more as seasons of the year that you will have to suffer thanks to people who believe that generating chaos and disorder they are promoting a healthier environment.

As new legislation is being introduced to tackle disorder, the very same people whose actions serve to justify the passing of stricter legislation are once again creating chaos on the streets and are now going to be joined by the new kids on the block and by other individuals who couldn't care less about any cause and are only around to engage in disreputable behaviour including violence and destruction of public and private property. As always, policing and clean up operations will be paid for by Joe Public.

Council Tax letters were already sent by local authorities including increases of the fees house owners have to pay at a time when local authorities are under additional financial stress, party because of the pandemic, partly because of expenses that rise year on year. So, less money for Police services and less monies for local services delibered by local authorities and this at a time when the Treasury is struggling with vast amounts of borrowing to deal with the pandemic and to protect peoples' jobs. Furlough schemes are basically state subsidies to support those who have lost their income and to keep those who are still working at work.

Any actions that could undermine the operations of vital financial services are a direct attack against the United Kingdom. Such actions can be said to be carried out to promote a healthier environment, but are the de-facto acts of terrorism at a time when the country is slowly, but surely heading towards relative normality. This is a time when we should be supporting the creation of new jobs. Extinction Rebellion doesn't care about jobs and this is also a way to say that Extinction Rebellion could not care less about millions of families in the United Kingdom that have lost their incomes or are struggling to survive with reduced incomes.

   

Much has been said about Huawei. What about the safety of ordinary communication links?

Much has been said about Huawei. What about the safety of ordinary communication links?

On a daily basis we learn about scams committed using ordinary communcation links in UK. It has gone beyond impersonation. Foreign gangs can now alter information registered by British servers operating links from overseas.

Using computers in India they can, for example, alter the information registered by British Telecom services. When you dial 1471, you are supposed to be told the number that actually called. Not anymore. The fraudsters can now alter at will the numbers registered by British Telecom servers and put in any number that they want as a way not to be tracked down.

We reported the matter to BT authorities, to Members of Parliament and to the Metropolitan Police as servers could be manipulated to extract vital information that could affect not just ordinary people and businesses but also public services including Police and Armed Forces.

How deep this goes is everybody's guess.Next time you receive a spam call think that it could well. be the tip of the iceberg, something involved not just your own personal security but also National Security.

The extent of investigations in the United Kingdom regarding gang rape and abuses against children

The extent of investigations in the United Kingdom regarding gang rape and abuses against children

BBC Salaries: Why BBC needs to cut free TV Licence for Pensioners? This is why.

Why the BBC is cutting free TV License for people over 75 years of age? This is why.

News and Current Affairs – presenter salaries

Name	Salary
Huw Edwards	£520,000 – £529,999
John Humphrys	£400,000 – £409,999
Andrew Marr	£400,000 – £409,999
Eddie Mair	£330,000 – £339,999
George Alagiah	£290,000 – £299,999
Nick Robinson	£250,000 – £259,999
Evan Davis	£250,000 – £259,999
Jon Sopel	£230,000 – £239,999
Mishal Husain	£220,000 – £229,999
Emily Maitlis	£220,000 – £229,999
Laura Kuenssberg	£220,000 – £229,999
Victoria Derbyshire	£210,000 – £219,999
Martha Kearney	£200,000 – £209,999
Sophie Raworth	£200,000 – £209,999
Jeremy Bowen	£200,000 – £209,999
Amol Rajan	£200,000 – £209,999
Fiona Bruce	£180,000 – £189,999
Katya Adler	£170,000 – £179,999
Mark Easton	£170,000 – £179,999
James Naughtie	£170,000 – £179,999
Sarah Montague	£160,000 – £169,999
Justin Webb	£160,000 – £169,999
Kamal Ahmed	£160,000 – £169,999
John Simpson	£160,000 – £169,999
Ben Brown	£150,000 – £159,999
Tina Daheley	£150,000 – £159,999
Simon Jack	£150,000 – £159,999
Fergal Keane	£150,000 – £159,999
John Pienaar	£150,000 – £159,999
Sarah Smith	£150,000 – £159,999

Radio presenter salaries

Name	Salary
Chris Evans	£1,660,000 – £1,669,999
Steve Wright	£550,000 – £559,999
Nicky Campbell	£410,000 – £419,999
Nick Grimshaw	£400,000 – £409,999
Stephen Nolan	£400,000 – £409,999
Simon Mayo	£340,000 – £349,999
Vanessa Feltz	£330,000 – £339,999
Ken Bruce	£300,000 – £309,999
Scott Mills	£280,000 – £289,999
Lauren Laverne	£230,000 – £239,999
Mark Radcliffe	£190,000 – £199,999
Greg James	£170,000 – £179,999
Jo Whiley	£170,000 – £179,999
Shaun Keaveny	£170,000 – £179,999
Moira Stuart	£160,000 – £169,999
Trevor Nelson	£150,000 – £159,999
Rachel Burden	£150,000 – £159,999
Jane Garvey	£150,000 – £159,999

Sport presenter salaries

Name	Salary
Gary Lineker	£1,750,000 – £1,759,999
Alan Shearer	£410,000 – £419,999
Gabby Logan	£230,000 – £239,999
Mark Chapman	£220,000 – £229,999
Sue Barker	£190,000 – £199,999
John McEnroe	£190,000 – £199,999
Jonathan Agnew	£180,000 – £189,999
Clare Balding	£180,000 – £189,999
Ian Wright	£170,000 – £179,999

---

Multiple genres and television presenter salaries

Name	Salary
Graham Norton	£600,000 – £609,999
Jeremy Vine	£440,000 – £449,999
Claudia Winkleman	£370,000 – £379,999
Jason Mohammad	£260,000 – £269,999
Nick Knowles	£230,000 – £239,999
Dan Walker	£220,000 – £229,999
Mary Berry	£190,000 – £199,999

Politicised Police Forces that fail in their duty of care put everybody in danger

Message sent to Warrington Police, Home Secretary Sajid Javid, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick and other relevant authorities

Dear Sir/Madam,

I witnessed events surrounding the presence of Tommy Robinson and given the failures of your officers – presumably there was a Commanding Officer at the scene – that completely failed in their duty of care there is the certain potential for a situation to get completely out of control with unwanted consequences.

There were several acts of aggression that you failed to tackle. Something thrown against an individual might appear to be an innocent act but it could trigger events that you wouldn’t want to occur– Tommy Robinson was hit and people who came to support him were hit including females that were attacked. When the said females sought help from a female Police Officer they were blatantly ignored by the said Police Officer. Several complaints made during the events were ignored by Police Officers.

It has been reported that because of his foolish action Danyaal Mahmud has put himself in mortal danger. If Police Officers had acted promptly and arrested Danyaal Mahmud, the whole incident could have been defused and trust in Police Forces would have being reinforced. Instead, Police Officers chose to ignore the incident. Danyaal Mahmud walked away and was filmed celebrating the incident. If anything were to happen to Danyaal Mahmud, Police Forces will be directly responsible. He acted foolishly and your Police Officers failed to do their duty.

There were other incidents. Female supporters were attacked and as I stated beforehand when they sought the cooperation of a female Police Officer they were ignored. When somebody reports to a Police Officer that he or she has been attacked and the Police Officer in question ignores him or her and moves away, what do you think members of the public think about the conduct of the said Police Officer and of the entire Police Force?

The misguided attitudes of Police Officers have not gone unnoticed and such blatant failures will further add to present levels of mistrust. The politization of Polices Officers will produce loss of life sooner than later. If Police Officers on the spot were given the order to ignore acts of aggression, the buck stops with the Commanding Officer/s that imparted such order.

The public mood has changed and tensions are rising. As tensions rise, prepare yourselves for unexpected undesirable events. Protesters that engage in acts of aggression make themselves a target for acts of violence as Action is followed by Reaction. During the recent campaign for local elections canvassers and candidates were attacked. Members of Parliament have expressed concerns fearing for their lives. It is not the role of the Police to play politics. Police should not take sides. A one-sided politicized approach to policing can certainly lead to fatal consequences because it encourages certain groups to become more daring and more aggressive as they believe that they have a license to attack politicians and their supporters.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen (Political Researcher)

London England United Kingdom

Moscow Russian Federation

Jeremy Corbyn's video: Infiltration within the British Armed Forces

Jeremy Corbyn's video: Infiltration within the British Armed Forces

We must always following the line of un-intended consequences. There is no coincidence that British soldiers appeared to be shooting at Jeremy Corbyn. The British Armed Forces know than when it counted Jeremy Corbyn was on the side of the Provisional IRA and those memories are deeply rooted Jeremy Corbyn is the ideological enemy and they know it and this is playing into the hands of groups that have long abandoned the political way and are bent on getting results the hard way. 

Funnily enough, the usual idiots are so dedicated to demonising what they call Far Right that when people from the so called Far Right try to raise the alert about impending doom their calls are purely and simply ignored.

Therefore, we can only watch developments knowing that those in charge will ignore the dangers and do nothing. In the meantime all we can do is to continue working with grassroots to be ready for the onslaught.

When the onslaught comes, Hope Not Hate, Searchlight and others will be sitting ducks. . 

British Democracy: Myth and Reality in a country in which Police Forces have become Political Police

British Democracy: Myth and Reality in a country in which Police Forces have become Political Police

Fact - In Britain, members of certain legal political parties are banned from certain professions and in Britain your political allegiance can be used against you when you are trying to get a job or keep a job.

Fact - In Britain, Police Forces are politicised and used to do the dirty work for vested political interests.

Fact - In Britain, the Judiciary is a political tool used for political persecution, discrimination and harassment. 

Fact - In Britain, those elected can blatantly ignore the will of the Electorate and promote violence against those who dare to resist the destruction of true Democracy and mass media acting as accomplices demonise and harass those who dare to stand for their rights.

British National Party - Police playing politics

British National Party - Police Playing Politics

It is not the role of Police Forces in the United Kingdom to be a political party. Unfortunately, the Police in this country behave like a political party. We experience this when Police authorities say that somebody cannot be a police officer or play any role in Police forces if the said person is a member or has been a member of the British National Party, of EDL or of a range of other organisations that happen to be political organisations. What is more such depraved attitudes of Police authorities is shared by politicians of other political organisations and those running the mass media in the United Kingdom. Entire segments of British public opinion have been excluded, discriminated against, persecuted, harassed, excluded from jobs in many sectors of the British economy.

When you hear voices talking against extremism, including representatives of Police Officers, you know that they don't have a clue about what they are talking about. If you systematically exclude people from engaging in lawful activities, you will push people towards extremism. 

Jack Renshaw and others that are in British jails were young people who had political ambitions and who wanted to engage in the political process lawfully via elections. They were not about violence. They were not about threatening to kill people. They were systematically discriminated against and their turned against a system that excluded them. For this we have to blame Police Forces, the Political Establishment and the Mass Media and their messages and their messages that demonised ordinary human beings. When they saw that there was no political outlet, they went off the rail and started planning to kill fellow human beings to vent their frustration.

Jo Cox was not a victim and she is usually depicted by the Political Establishment and the Mass Media. She was a victimiser. She was actively campaigning to reinforce the trends towards exclusion and demonising and she fell on her own sword when an individual went out of his way to get her out.

Today, Members of Parliament  complain that they don't feel safe. Well, Members of Parliament of all sides of the political spectrum represented in Parliament feel unsafe. The time was well overdue for Members of Parliament to be made to feel unsafe because we as ordinary people have been feeling unsafe for a very long time because of the policies of a Parliament that lives most of the time in cuckooland. Do ordinary people feel safe? You can ask the relatives of those who have lost their lives or suffered because of the climate of insecurity created by the Political Establishment. They talk a  lot about gang crime but they do close to nothing to deal with the realities that lead to gang crime and knife crime. For ages ordinary people have been forced to live in subhuman conditions and the said subhuman conditions lead to crime.

Zero Hour contracts, sub-employment and other ills of hour time, what do the Political Establishment and the Mass Media think that badly paid unsafe jobs generate? They talk about school exclusions. Well, where do most of those excluded come from? They come from households that live on the edge in a permanent struggle for survival.

Look at the membership criteria of political parties. When they justify exclusions, they are justifying social exclusion and violence. They talk about having a national debate. Well, a real national debate should include all segments of the political spectrum including those they classify as extremist. 

Let me give an example. Before the Good Friday Agreement, the Provisional IRA and others were classified as terrorist organisations and Sinn Fein - the political side of the Provisional IRA - was excluded. Was there peace? When did Peace finally arrive? When there were talks between people who hated each other to death. 

The Far Right and those called Far Right have a genuine right to be part of the national debate for the debate to be national. Until everyone is included and until Police Authorities are forced to stop talking political rubbish, there will not be peace and more and more people will be going off the rail and engaging in violence as the only way of making their views known.

Britain is ill; Violence is spreading.

Britain is ill; Violence is spreading.

Political reasons are not the only reasons why tensions are rising beyond safe limits. Violent attacks are becoming deadly serious and more vicious. When somebody decides to launch random attacks against individuals he never met before, against whom he has no personal grievances, we cannot expect to be safe wherever we go.

How can you prevent an unwarranted attack for which there is no clear motivation? The plain answer: You cannot. I believe that mental health issues are a major component of violent attacks in the United Kingdom. It is estimated following major research that one in ten teenagers suffer from some form of mental illness. Only a minute number of them are formally diagnosed and an even smaller number are actually treated before they reach a critical point.

Police Forces were recently given a go ahead to carry out more stop and search operations to try and deter people from carrying knives but the one who gets away is the one that commits the crime with lethal consequences.

We can deal with rational individuals that might listen and stop carrying knives. What about those suffering from mental illness? Will they be able to listen? 

Nick Griffin is the actual British National Party Leader

Nick Griffin is the actual British National Party Leader

When Adam Walker stood on a platform in London promising 'a New Leadership Style', he spoke about a brighter future with lots of visibility. Since then, the Karate Instructor has been practically invisible. Adam Walker is used to carry out interviews with members of the public without telling them who he is and he gets away with it because, unlike Nick Griffin, Adam Walker has no useful political profile apart for a dubious personal profile generated by a very public confrontation with students that made him become very shy and reluctant to appear in front of television cameras.

Nick Griffin was directly targeted because he used to get things done. Under his leadership a so called Far Right political party achieved what no so called Far Right organisation had achieved before or even dream about achieving. Two MEPs, a Member of the London Assembly, effective Opposition in a London local authority and a significant number of Councillors across the rest of the country. 

The spiteful National Front that never ever achieved anything of significance set out to destroy the British National Party. While the British National Party glorified national symbols and national flags, the National Front was either using flags with Swastikas or glorifying a foreign ideology while pretending to be British. National Front might gather around the Cenotaph but their ideals are far from being British ideals.

It is no coincidence that individuals like Richard Edmonds and Tony Martin went back to National Front. In actual fact, they never left and the National Front since its early days has been at war with itself, a war that was promoted by infiltrators like Sonia Gable who used to get information by mole-ing with practically every single National Front high ranking officer.

National Front Leaders don't last too long. But this doesn't really matter because it has never achieved anything of significance anyway. 

Did John Tyndall actually change when he left National Front to create the British National Party? Not really. And this is precisely why his replacement as Leader by Nick Griffin came as a shock to the system. People like John Tyndall wanted a bit of the same away from the backstabbing routine of the National Front. For John Tyndall, BNP was supposed to be NF Mark 2. His plans were brought to a halt by somebody who is much better educated than he was. The Cambridge Man wanted a completely new organisation without the crappy baggage of the National Front. 

People who were sick and tired of the treacherous practices of both Labour and Conservatives joined the new organisation. Labour voters and Conservative voters decided to support the British National Party and this made possible the landslide that produces two Members of the European Parliament. 

This was a red alert for the Establishment and the Mass Media that immediately decided to infiltrate and destroy the British National Party from within. Police Officers joined the British National Party and went around promoting dissent, engaging in racist talk and making salutes pretending to be genuine British National Party supporters. The campaign against Nick Griffin and the British National Party was planned, organised and implemented by the Political Establishment. To this effect, they used the mass media and para-political organisations like the UAF and Hope Not Gate. Labour Party politicians and mass media including the BBC produced a gigantic cover up regarding the indecent and criminal activities of Muslim gangs mainly of Pakistani descent for many years. In actual fact, Nick Griffin was the first one to denounce organised gang rape including drugs and alcohol and did so in dialogue with the BBC only to be called racist for denouncing criminal activities.

For more than 16 years, the Labour Party and Police knew about gang rape in epic proportions in places like Rotherham and other British cities and did absolutely nothing to protect vulnerable children many of who were being supposedly protected by Social Services that rather than protecting children were actively acting as suppliers of vulnerable children for the rapists.

The flag against crimes against children was later taken by Tommy Robinson - himself a former British National Party member -, Paul Golding - himself a former British National Party Member-, Jayda Fransen and Anne Marie Waters. With the exception of Anne Marie Waters, Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen have all had to serve prisons sentences as campaigners against abuses against children and campaigners against terrorism.

The next stage has been to ban campaigners like Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson from using social media to raise awareness of what is an ongoing problem in Britain. The likes of Gerard Batten and Kate Hopkins have joined the fight against abuses but entire areas of Britain have been taken over by individuals who can carry out attacks while little is being done to prevent such attacks or to punish the perpetrators.

Extremism is being promoted by the Establishment, the mass media and para-political organisations who try to silence those who denounce crime and this is done for political reasons. Certain Members of Parliament need the money and votes of the perpetrators of crimes to keep themselves in the House of Commons. When a Labour MP raised her head to denounce crimes, she was targeted and called racist.

Accusations of racism are the favourite tool of many political operators when they try to cover up abuses being committed. Recently, several Labour MPs left the Labour Party making speeches about anti-Semitism - including amongst them a Jewish MP. They should be reminded of the fact that a white Jewish Lady was told by Muslim leaders that she couldn't stand as local Candidate because she was too Jewish and too white. Any complaints about it? Isn't refusing to support a candidate because she was Jewish and white a flagrant expression of racism and anti-Semitism? What happened to Muslim leaders that engaged in racism and anti-Semitism? Absolutely nothing. Not even a slap on the wrists.

There should be one Justice for all regardless of race, religion or any other consideration. Justice should be Universal. But this doesn't happen in Britain, not even when you are dealing with Social Services that seem to be making decisions based on race, religion and nationality.

When there is so much talk about new political parties, there is the need of a political organisation that really and truly represent the views of a growing number of people who have become disenchanted with so called mainstream political parties. Without a Parliament that is truly representative of public opinion, we are going to go from crisis to crisis and as the gap between those occupying positions of power and the rest of the population grows, British Democracy will become increasingly unstable.

The rise of the Gilet Jaunes in France and elsewhere is no coincidence. Those who have no political representation take to the streets and conflict soon follows. Those wanting to protect a status quo that is not working use repression and bans up to the point when they lose control as a a consequence we see the rise of the number of corpses lying on the streets.

For a true Democratic System to exist and be effective, all views must be represented everywhere and this is includes governing bodies, the administration, education, mass media and social media.  

 

  

National Action: The Truth will shock you

NATIONAL ACTION: THE TRUTH WILL SHOCK YOU

In the early days, Jack Renshaw was like any other guy of his age. He had a healthy interest in politics and he had a career to show for it. He like many others joined the so called Far Right because he believed in the Nationalist spirit. He like many others was feeling increasingly angry against the so called political establishment that he and others saw as giving preference to outsiders in spite of very pressing needs of Britons that were not being met. What he heard from speakers like Richard Edmonds from National Front and others convinced him that he was on the right path. At the time, what was defined as British Nationalism was very much linked to Racial Politics and World World Two. There was nothing about violence but there were very well defined boundaries in terms of political activism, of the notion of us and the others. The preferred way was political and everything was about winning elections.

Jack Renshaw was made by Hope Not Hate, the UAF, the BBC and also by the Labour Party and its para-political branches. Everywhere the British National Party went, its supporters were called Nazi, Fascist and Racist to the point that instead of being offended by such labelling many got to the conclusion that whatever they did they would still be called Nazi, Fascist and Racist. Things got to a point when the stereotype created by those who were against the British National Party created a public image that attracted individuals that admired the Dritte Reich and its policies. 

British Security Services infiltrated the British National Party pretending to be genuine supporters and acted as agent provocateurs promoting loose talk. British Security agents went around inciting people to talk about the Dritte Reich, Adolf Hitler and making salutes while pretending to be British National Party Members. The Police had no interest in protecting the public. All they wanted was to compromise the British National Party for political reasons reinforcing existing stereotypes. 

British Security Services have for a very long time being involved in criminal activities and in this case it was about criminal activities with a political purpose. We tracked down British agents when they were not pretending to be political activists i.e. some of them were working at the Home Office in Croydon when the Croydon Branch of the British National Party was rising.

British agents had no limits. They identified vulnerable people - including those with health issues - and used them to spy on the British National Party and to create internal dissent. This combined with internal differences were the seeds of what happened years later despite big electoral successes.

The planned agenda was to bring down the British National Party and attacking individuals was a way to do it. If you were a British National Party member you were banned from certain jobs in the state sector. Much more than that, if you were a known member of the British National Party you would not be employed or you would lose your job also in the private sector. This continues to apply even when the British National Party is not even one per cent of what it used to be in terms of political success. This form of political discrimination that seriously undermined personal lives and family lives contributed to create the feeling of being hunted and pushed many over the top making them believe that this is was not just political. It became a fight for survival and in a fight for survival you kill or you are killed. It is an issue of Us or They.

Extremism has been promoted by political parties, para-political organisations like Hope Not Hate and the UAF, the mass media and the Security Services. People were becoming disenfranchised not just from politics but also from society as a whole that they saw as the enemy that had to be eliminated.

People like Jack Renshaw went from being healthy youngsters with political ambitions to being people frustrated and angry that no longer saw the point of trying to engage in the democratic process. The idea was then 'they hate us, they are ruining our lives, let's stand up and fight.'

Discrimination, persecution, harassment and bans will promote extremism. When people feel that they are being hunted, for a while they will withdraw and when they feel that there is nowhere to go they will turn around and kill.

We need open debate but not just debate. We need plural debate. We must not push people underground to the point that they no longer believe in democracy and fairness. When people become disenfranchised, they will be dangerous. If they are isolated from the rest of society, they will see society as the enemy. 

   

Jayda Fransen: How to be in Northern Ireland without being in Northern Ireland?

Jayda Fransen: How to be in Northern Ireland without being in Northern Ireland?

The incompatibilities of two legal systems: England's legal system and Northern Ireland's legal system are being used for political harassment and anti-terror legislation is being used for purposes that have nothing to do with tackling terrorism.

Northern Ireland is de-facto a country outside the United Kingdom, no matter what British politicians want you to believe and this is all too real when dealing with legal issues.

When it comes to bail conditions in England and in Northern Ireland, the English legal system struggles to find solutions that are not part of present legislation and judges have to be "creative' (creative is one way of putting it) to fill up the gaps created by legal incompatibilities.

Jayda Fransen's real residence is a property in Northern Ireland but English authorities forced her to reside in England having to pay for accommodation in England that she could ill afford. She was given the choice to live in a hostel surrounded by real criminals including drug-addicts, rapists, paedophiles and the like. Although part of the bill for housing is paid by the state, people placed on bail and forced to live at a certain address that is not their home address are forced to pay part of the bill even when they have their own homes somewhere else in the United Kingdom.

Given the fact that the reasons to imprison her and to later impose draconian bail conditions were utterly political, she was treated like somebody involved in Islamic Terrorism. Due to her very high political profile, she asked SO15 to ensure that the places where she was going to be forced to reside in were safe but SO15 officers failed in their duty of care and told her that 'if she was attacked, she would be transferred to some location in Liverpool'. Translation: wait until somebody attacks you for us to protect you.

A female Probation Officer when asked a direct yes/no question about very serious issues could only come up with a reply saying 'I believe that...'. "I believe that'? An Officer of the Law is not supposed to believe. An Officer of the Law must be able to answer Yes or No. Either security measures were implemented or security measures were not implemented.

We can hardly blame a Probation Officer of not being able to answer a direct question after listening to Members of Parliament including Members of the British Government talking about liability and evidence. They could only produce words like perhaps, maybe, possibly, most probably when dealing with an extremely serious accusation against another country.

It should be mandatory for Members of Parliament to witness trials to see how Legislation is actually being implemented and to see what is going wrong. The judges were struggling to pass sentence but in the end it is not the judges' fault to be put in such idiotic situation because of defective legislation passed by incompetent Parliamentarians who very seldom have to face real everyday cases in the courts.

Are British Courts of Law and Police Services being used for political persecution? Yes, they are. Anti-Terror legislation is being used in cases that have nothing to do with Terrorism. Police Officers are being ordered to detain and arrest individuals using Anti-Terror legislation in cases that have nothing to do with Terrorism.

The so called Prevent initiative has done more damage than good. If anything, it has created widespread animosity because of blatant abuses. Abuses will not promote trust. Abuses will promote Extremism. We have seen Police Officers asking families to denounce their own relatives and friends and asking teachers to denounce their own pupils including those of a very young age. These are not just nonsensical attitudes. They are dangerous attitudes. What kind of society are they trying to create?  

   

  

Attacks against political parties and political party members have been blessed by the Political Establishment

Attacks against political parties and political party members have been blessed by the Political Establishment

Owen Jones (The Guardian) - Anna Soubry MP

Both Owen Jones and Anna Soubry MP promoted and celebrated attacks against political parties and political party members.

Owen Jones actively supports thugs that engage in political violence and his writings are not conducive to peaceful political coexistence but since the National Union of Journalist has an active agenda that leads to persecution discrimination, harassment and violence this doesn't come as a surprise. 

It remains to be seen if the aforementioned would remember what happened in 1930s Germany and perhaps learnt a few lessons from it because the kind of realities that they promote are certainly leading Britain to become 1930s Germany, especially when nowadays political violence in Germany is on the rise and Britain will soon become a reflection of it. They both lamented the death of Jo Cox MP but they don't seem to understand that their behaviour is putting people in danger.

If we don't respect each other and if we don't care for each other, regardless of our political differences, Britain will be the new Weimar Republic.  

Simon Darby offers his account of an event during which Owen Jones was filmed celebrating political violence.

"Since the College Green assault on the BNP’s newly elected MEPs in 2009 has come in to focus, I’ll share a few recollections of the event. I do so for the purpose of making people aware of the increasingly desperate manoeuvres by the power structure in this country, approaching March 29th, to officially reclassify some 17.4 million people as far-right extremists.

Tuesday 9th June 2009 just a couple of days after the BNP’s incredible breakthrough in the European elections and it was my job to sort out a press conference. Having myself obtained 122,000 votes (8.6%) across the West Midlands I was somewhat disappointed not to be on the podium, but the show had to go on.

It was my idea to host the event at College Green, right outside Parliament, since whilst working at the GLA I had done a number of interviews from that same location. I found it to be secure, most of the time crawling with police and easily accessible to the world’s press. More than this though, with Parliament in the background any images would tend to visually turbocharge our breakthrough and help cement the achievement in the public’s mind.

Both Nick and Andrew were happy with the idea, but BNP security were concerned about the complexities of operating in London. Far from “BNP Thugs” our security team was a highly disciplined, politically savvy synthesis of ex-military, martial arts experts and doormen from some of the roughest cities and towns across the UK.

Those initial concerns were alleviated by the use of special forces grade communications equipment allowing extraction vehicles to be in close orbit to the event at all times away from the prying eyes and ears of the boys in blue. That proved to be a very wise move with this particular choice of winners enclosure.

All progressed smoothly enough at first, I was pleased with the size of the snarling press pack I had conjured up knowing we would not be wasting our time. Then all of a sudden I heard chants and out of the corner of my eye I saw a hundred strong herd of far-left zombies was shuffling towards us.

I don’t need to say what happened next as the attack has been seen by most. There are however photos of myself at the event with a look of shock on my face almost as if I’m smiling. How on earth, in one of the tightest security zones in the country, do a mob of one hundred assailants at first assemble, then walk unhindered, right outside Westminster, to deliver a sustained uninterrupted ten minute assault on democratically elected MPs?

It goes without saying that the far left and the media, if there is a difference, co-operate to facilitate violent intimidation. BBC and Channel 4 get the money shot and the left alienate support amongst the middle classes and delegitimise our message. However, in the College Green case the only conclusion you could draw was that certain elements within the police were playing the game too. It was a pattern repeated often over the next few years.

As for the attack itself I remember the bizarre giant rugby scrum that ensued, moving with a momentum and shape akin to the Great Red Spot on Jupiter and the Andromeda Galaxy. Thanks to security nobody was hurt, although I did feel sorry for young Jay from Essex. Attached closely to Nick he continued to take blows whilst protecting him, resisting the obvious urge to retaliate which he was capable of doing most effectively.

As is nearly always the case with left wing violence against nationalists, nobody gets charged. My local police took it all very seriously, but the Met conveniently mislaid the file. In fact the only person they pursued with interest was one of our security team who extracted us with his expert defensive driving. Maybe they wanted to recruit him.

What “robust action” the police will take against people ”harassing” the likes of Anna Soubry and Owen Jones is unknown. However I can tell you for sure that ANTIFA and other violent leftist groups will not be classified as domestic terrorists. Their members will not be charged with belonging to an illegal organisation. Their organisers, journalists and serving police officers will not be arrested for conspiracy to incite violent disorder. Union backers will not have their funds seized under anti-terrorist legislation and The Electoral Commission will not be disbanded for allowing violence and intimidation to undermine our democratic system for decades. If they were merely football hooligans, well that would be a very different matter."

Labour MP turned into ordinary criminal

Fiona Onasanya, who was convicted of perverting the course of justice

Labour MP turned into ordinary criminal

She has the luxury and the privilege of being a Member of Parliament belonging to an ethnic minority at a time when many talk about representation of ethnic minorities in the House of Commons. 

She was accused of driving at more than 30 miles an hour in a 20 miles an hour zone. What would have been the rational and decent thing to do? To apologise, pay the penalty and move on with her life and her political life. 

Instead, she chose to lie and not only that. She accused an innocent man of involvement and gave a false address. It didn't register in her mind that the Police would try and contact the person she falsely accused. The authorities found out that the man in question was not even in the country when the incident took place.

She was rightfully convicted of Perverting the Course of Justice - one the most serious crimes anyone can ever commit in the United Kingdom - and is due for sentencing. This individual has let down the Labour Party, has let down her constituents, has let down herself and those related to her and has become an ordinary criminal with the aggravation of having committed a crime being not just a member of the public but an elected representative.

She has proven that she is not somebody that can be trusted and she has proven that she doesn't have the moral fibre to be a Member of Parliament. 

I am sure that there are many potential representatives of Black communities in the United United Kingdom that could do a much better job than this despicable individual. She is a disgrace to her own race.