Hermann Göring: No German cities will ever be bombed = NATO: we can attack the Russian Federation, but the Russian Federation will never attack us.

 

The concept of invincibility is still very much amongst us and we see it in the speeches and statements made by politicians and mass media personalities. We see in news reports and commentary about the conflict in Ukraine.

All the talk about using long range missiles is based on the concept of invincibility and of 'it cannot happen to us'.

Reality is exactly the opposite. A war by proxy can really and truly become a direct military involvement that could see Berlin, London, Paris, Warsaw and many other cities turned into ash and debris with no living soul in them.

We are not in the 1930s and 1940s. We are in 2024. The distances have become a lot shorter. What could be done in months and weeks can now be done in minutes.

It takes 15 minutes for a 100 megaton nuclear device to reach London and there will be scarcely the time to evacuate a city of more than 8 million people during the night and of more than 9 million people during the day. Not that policians, military men, mass media and civilians could take any notice of what could land on top of them all. They have got the same of awareness the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had in 1945. They believe - once again - in the concept of invincibility.  

One only has to read what those posting messages on social media say to know how convinced they are, believing that they can attack somebody else without a care in the world.

Understanbly, people have no personal memories of World War One or World War Two. The scenes of devastation is something that they can see in pictures, but they never had any personal experience of it. I guess those have an idea of what could happen to Europe are now being massacred by Israel and seeing their cities and towns turned into rubble with no living soul in them. It takes time for those who have not been exposed to total destruction to understand they themselves could suffer a similar fate.

Caroline Dinenage MP: news show that a Member of Parliament misrepresented the committee she heads in Parliament

 

A witchhunt promoted by a Conservative Member of Parliament that despite being the head of a Parliamentary Committee reportedly did not bother to inform other members of the Committee about her intentations to send what is now official correspondence used to target a former BBC presenter.

In a country in which we assume that it is up to the Judiciary to deliver justice, Members of Parliament and Mass Media have given themselves the power to accuse, judge and convict members of the public that they do no like. 

Not even a formal accusation has been launched against a former BBC presenter. No arrest. No charges. No trial. Regardless of that, Members of Parliament and Mass Media are trying to publicly destroy the presenter.

You might dislike Russell Brand. You might totally disagree with Russell Brand, but if what is being reported about a breakdown of Parliamentary code of ethics is true, Caroline Dinenage MP should resign as a Member of Parliament and another by-election should be called. And what about newspapers that print scandalous stories based on thin air, rumour and innuendo? Mass Media like to define themselves as defender of freedom, something they very cleary are not. They are just scandal makers that take every opportunity to launch attacks against those that cannot defend themselves. Those accusing Russell Brand are visibly cowards that do not dare to show their faces and are happy to act with total impunity and anonimity.

With do remember that the BBC did to Cliff Richard, turning his life into a living hell. Cliff Richard took on the BBC and won against what was visibly a scandal making exercise. 

 

Environmental gatherings: Saving the planet?

Environmental summits are no more than grandiose talking shops for picture opportunities and empty promises and am sure that mass media loved them because they give them something to write about without much effort and surely there is a crowd worldwide eager to swallow every fib that comes out of magnificent wastes of time.

Headlines like 'tens of billions needed to save the planet' might sound impressive - am sure they sound impressive - but they are as impressive as meaningless as no country in the world will ever consider spending such amounts of money that will surely come from additional borrowing that would lead them to implement austerity policies that no one likes to implement because they usually land those who try to implement into deep water. 

Questions that are seldom asked include 'who is going to get such amount of money and what they would be suposed to do with it?'. The 'what for', 'how' and issues of accountability are non existing. As soons the the mass media circus is over, it will be business as usual until the next mass media circus. 

After the mass media circus, the real issues of everyday life will once again be on the table. Ladies and Gentlemen, we have an energy crisis. Germany is said to be in talks with United Kingdom to seek gas supplies - Germany does not have enough storage capacity for liquidified gas and even if Germany had enough storage capacity the amount of energy obtained from liquidified gas is quickly reduced by the same process of turning liquified gas into usable gas. This putting aside issues involving transportation of liquified gas done with a lot of fossil fuels. All those ships that carry liquified gas use fossil fuels and this has a cost. The cost of maritime transport has gone up considerably to the point that bringing in goods from faraway places has become extremely onerous reducing commercial margins generated by low production costs abroad. Perhaps the German move to transfer production to China was inspired by the fact that bringing factories closer to raw materials will allow them to reduce production cost a lot more. Scania made a similar move years ago when much of the operation was transferred to Brazil. Brazil needed trucks and it was easier and cheaper to produce trucks in Brazil that incidentally was going to be a major market for Swedish trucks.

The other issue that lies around is fracking. For all the talk about fracking producing earthquakes, you would need specially sensitive equipment to detect such 'earthquakes', and obviously ordinary people who don't have such equipment will hardly ever know about the said 'earthquakes'. Mass media have been very active creating an artificial monster out of gullible minds that are very willing to believe whatever horror story they are told. Although fracking will not provide immediate results in terms of increasing energy supplies, it is something to take into consideration when energy supplies are going down. Nuclear energy is a certain possibility but it takes decades for a nuclear plant to be built to produce the energy that we desperately need. We need energy now. This is one of the subjects Germany will be discussing with Britain to avoid what now look like unavoidable blackouts in the biggest manufacturing country in Europe.

Britain's impending depression: Mass media focus on witch-hunt instead

Britain impending depression: Mass media focus on witch-hunt instead

Emily Maitlis heading a witch-hunt

At the time when mass media and politicians should be focusing on what is going to happen when the Lockdown is finally lifted, the emphasis is on a witch-hunt.

When unemployment is bound to reach more than 10 million in the United Kingdom alone, time is awfully wasted in point scoring, the kind of exercise in which the whole country loses.

If Parliament is incapble of dealing with the real issues, why do we need a Parliament at all? The amount of borrowing continues to escalate and when the furlough scheme is finally over, Britain will be facing a crisis that will be an absolute catastrophe. But the so called Free Press that is neither Free nor real Press doesn't give a damn about millions of British families that will be literally left without a roof and without money to put food on the dining tables.

When you have no savings and no monies coming your way, you cannot afford to pay your mortage, your loans and credit cards and this means a default of gigantic proportions, much bigger than any financial crisis we have ever faced before. Neither of the financial insitutions will be able to survive such a crisis. We risk being swallowed by mountain of debt and defaulted loans and mortages.

Unfortunaly, we have got party political operators like Emily Maitlis using and abusing the BBC as a platform to promote her own agenda, whatever credibility the BBC has left after years of partiality and political meddling.

If because of a financial crisis without precedent in the United Kingdom the political scene becomes extremely polarized, the Weimar Republic will be seen as Paradise on Earth. The truth no longer matters. All that matters is innuendo, distortion, lies, deceit, demonization and gossip. I suggest that we rename so call Mass Media. From now on, they should be known as SGI (Scandals Gossiping Industry).  

Royal Household: Harry and Meghan

Royal Household: Harry and Meghan

In the 1930, Prince Edward could not marry Wallis Simpson because she was a divorcee. After that, Princess Margaret was not allowed to marry the man she very much loved - an ace of the Royal Air Force who served with distinction because his wife had left him (he became a divorcee due to no fault of his own). 

These were the precedents, but year later Prince Charles who had been a lover of Camila Parker Bowles was allowed to marry Camila Parker Bowles and suddenly divorce was no longer an issue. 

There had not been an issue either when it came to public morality that the Lord Mountbatten was married and slept with young boys while his wife slept around with men including foreign dignataries. 

But somehow in the eyes of the mandarins of mass media Harry and Meghan have committed a mortal sin by wanting to live their own lives in their own way. They are poisoning the minds of members of the public in the same way that they killed Princess Diana - Harry's mother.  They are at it again. The prostitutes that like to call themselves Defenders of Free Speech are no better than an organised Mafia making an awful amount of money by means of fabricated scandals.

British Democracy: Myth and Reality in a country in which Police Forces have become Political Police

British Democracy: Myth and Reality in a country in which Police Forces have become Political Police

Fact - In Britain, members of certain legal political parties are banned from certain professions and in Britain your political allegiance can be used against you when you are trying to get a job or keep a job.

Fact - In Britain, Police Forces are politicised and used to do the dirty work for vested political interests.

Fact - In Britain, the Judiciary is a political tool used for political persecution, discrimination and harassment. 

Fact - In Britain, those elected can blatantly ignore the will of the Electorate and promote violence against those who dare to resist the destruction of true Democracy and mass media acting as accomplices demonise and harass those who dare to stand for their rights.

British National Party - Police playing politics

British National Party - Police Playing Politics

It is not the role of Police Forces in the United Kingdom to be a political party. Unfortunately, the Police in this country behave like a political party. We experience this when Police authorities say that somebody cannot be a police officer or play any role in Police forces if the said person is a member or has been a member of the British National Party, of EDL or of a range of other organisations that happen to be political organisations. What is more such depraved attitudes of Police authorities is shared by politicians of other political organisations and those running the mass media in the United Kingdom. Entire segments of British public opinion have been excluded, discriminated against, persecuted, harassed, excluded from jobs in many sectors of the British economy.

When you hear voices talking against extremism, including representatives of Police Officers, you know that they don't have a clue about what they are talking about. If you systematically exclude people from engaging in lawful activities, you will push people towards extremism. 

Jack Renshaw and others that are in British jails were young people who had political ambitions and who wanted to engage in the political process lawfully via elections. They were not about violence. They were not about threatening to kill people. They were systematically discriminated against and their turned against a system that excluded them. For this we have to blame Police Forces, the Political Establishment and the Mass Media and their messages and their messages that demonised ordinary human beings. When they saw that there was no political outlet, they went off the rail and started planning to kill fellow human beings to vent their frustration.

Jo Cox was not a victim and she is usually depicted by the Political Establishment and the Mass Media. She was a victimiser. She was actively campaigning to reinforce the trends towards exclusion and demonising and she fell on her own sword when an individual went out of his way to get her out.

Today, Members of Parliament  complain that they don't feel safe. Well, Members of Parliament of all sides of the political spectrum represented in Parliament feel unsafe. The time was well overdue for Members of Parliament to be made to feel unsafe because we as ordinary people have been feeling unsafe for a very long time because of the policies of a Parliament that lives most of the time in cuckooland. Do ordinary people feel safe? You can ask the relatives of those who have lost their lives or suffered because of the climate of insecurity created by the Political Establishment. They talk a  lot about gang crime but they do close to nothing to deal with the realities that lead to gang crime and knife crime. For ages ordinary people have been forced to live in subhuman conditions and the said subhuman conditions lead to crime.

Zero Hour contracts, sub-employment and other ills of hour time, what do the Political Establishment and the Mass Media think that badly paid unsafe jobs generate? They talk about school exclusions. Well, where do most of those excluded come from? They come from households that live on the edge in a permanent struggle for survival.

Look at the membership criteria of political parties. When they justify exclusions, they are justifying social exclusion and violence. They talk about having a national debate. Well, a real national debate should include all segments of the political spectrum including those they classify as extremist. 

Let me give an example. Before the Good Friday Agreement, the Provisional IRA and others were classified as terrorist organisations and Sinn Fein - the political side of the Provisional IRA - was excluded. Was there peace? When did Peace finally arrive? When there were talks between people who hated each other to death. 

The Far Right and those called Far Right have a genuine right to be part of the national debate for the debate to be national. Until everyone is included and until Police Authorities are forced to stop talking political rubbish, there will not be peace and more and more people will be going off the rail and engaging in violence as the only way of making their views known.

Germany: The victims are those called Far Right attacked by Left Wing Criminals

Germany: The victims are those called Far Right attacked by Left Wing Criminals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r77mWSY4e0w

The Political Establishment and the mass media want you to believe that those called Far Right are monsters when in fact it is exactly the opposite. Left Wing Criminals are regularly attacking those called Far Right and destroying political headquarters of so called Far Right parties who are legal organisations taking part in the legal and democratic life in Germany.

UK Democracy: Real Options or merely private agendas of people we don't know?

Democracy: Real Options or merely private agendas?

After all the hype of weeks or even months of political campaigning, of being bombarded by mass media with all kinds of conflicting messages and half-truths, polling day comes and you head towards the polling station to do your duty and choose from a list of candidates that have been pre-selected for you. Not your real choices. Not that you have any say before, during or after the votes have been counted. You are heading to a polling station to sign a blank cheque. Your are not choosing policies. You are merely voting for a certain individual/individuals that are going to be making their own choices and are going to be paid for making their own choices. We call it Democracy and are constantly told how lucky we are to have somebody making decisions for us.

They say that Referenda are imperfect. What could be more imperfect than putting a piece of paper inside a box without knowing what you are really voting for? And we do this in every single election. We are sold smoke and mirrors and we buy them every time because we have been told that this is Democracy. People vote in elections for a myriad of reasons and do so most of the time without having a clue about the consequences of doing what we are doing. We call this 'the Civilised Way of doing things."

I don't feel represented. Every time there is an election, I have to make a gigantic effort to believe and very often when it comes to selecting candidates I don't believe that I am doing the right thing. In one of the latest elections, I chose one candidate in particular because he was an Independent and did not represent political parties that I have come to profoundly disagree with or even hate. Given the way the system is, I already knew who the winning candidate was going to be and therefore knew that voting for the said Independent candidate was the equivalent of throwing a piece of paper in a waste bin. It was not a vote because of conviction. It was a vote not to vote for what I am against. 

When we read or hear about people being disenfranchised, it is not surprising that more and more people are disenfranchised. The reason the EU Referendum was so successful in terms of numbers of voters was that it was a binary decision about one fundamental issue: To be or not to be Members of the European Union. Many people felt than in spite of the frustrations generated by elections they could really and truly have a say and that it was a one-off opportunity in which their votes would really mean something. 

Britain's recipes for disaster: Policing in crisis via irrational budget cuts

Britain's recipes for disaster: Policing in crisis via irrational budget cuts

The news that local communities are having to step in to replace absent Police Forces that have been cut to the bone to the point that they have become ineffective is not the image a successful country can offer to the world. The news that Britain doesn't have enough Border Police resources to patrol its own coast to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country is not the image a successful country can offer to the world.

We can build very expensive aircraft carriers. We can have a Nuclear Deterrent. We can invest billions in Defence. But if we don't have the minimum resources to deal with vital areas of public security and public safety, we are doomed as a country.

Neither Conservatives, nor Labour, nor Liberal Democrats, none of the so called mainstream political parties have the vision that is need to keep Britain safe and this is why we need National Socialism to deal with public security and public safety, to ensure that everybody is safe without the stupidity promoted by Political Correctness.

When prisons are drugs and violence safe heavens, when we are not safe in our streets and in our own homes, when criminals known to Security Forces can carry out murderous attacks because we don't have neither the resources nor the intelligence to deal with threats we are doomed as a country.

For all the speeches about 'lessons will be learnt', Security Services in this country are not fit for purpose and the Political Establishment and the Mass Media are very much to blame for this nightmare.

Jailing people for Reckless Statements could be violation of Human Rights

Jailing People for Reckless Statements could be violation of Human Rights

In Totalitarian Britain, Police Forces are being used for Political Persecution and I must emphasise the word 'used' because at the end of the day if they are used to terrorise and persecute for political purposes they are just following orders given by their masters.

People get angry. People get frustrated. People express their anger openly and this is only human. People say things that in normal conditions they wouldn't say and we need to have a degree of understanding of why sometimes human beings react, explode with anger.

In Politically Correct Britain, the expression 'causing offence' is being used to terrorise individuals to deter them from using their Freedom of Speech to the point when Freedom of Speech is no more. The truth can be offensive to those who don't want the truth to be told.

Hating other people is normal. It is absolutely human. Expressing harsh criticism against other people is absolutely normal. If you hate somebody, it is your human right to say 'I hate so and so'. If you hate a Jew or a Muslim, if you hate a Conservative MP, a Labour MP or an MP of whatever political party, it should be totally normal and acceptable to say it as loud as you can and as publicly as you can. But we live in a Totalitarian State in which only those who are more equal than others are free to express their hatred.

If want to say that you hate an individual classed as Far Right, you can say it without fear of 'causing offence' and without fear of being accused of 'hate speech'. Jews and Muslims are free to insult and threaten anybody else. But beware if you are the one saying that you hate Jews or Muslims. You will be arrested and most probably jailed accused of anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, racism and of indulging in hate speech.

The direct consequence of double standards is that, at the end of the day, double standards will fuel anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and Jews and Muslims will be targeted and in some cases killed because repression and double standards make people feel that they are discriminated against and persecuted for expressing their anger while Jews and Muslims are allowed to get away with murder.

Lets look at the conduct of mass media and politicians when it comes to those they hate. They are free to attack, to libel and defame and even threaten those they hate but the same freedom is not accorded to ordinary people or to those they hate.

If an ordinary individual and those classed as Far Right were to say what some politicians and mass media or those classed as 'antifa' say, they would be arrested and jailed.

We are all human beings. We love and we hate and rightly so. No one should be persecuted or harassed for expressing their love or their hatred towards others. We must get rid of Political Correctness and legislation that prevent us from being human and in the process we will free the courts for courts to be used to deal with real crimes.

You hate Jews? So what? You hate Muslims? So what? As long as you don't go out armed and with intent to attack somebody, you should be free to express your hatred. Unfortunately, with every passing day, we go deeper and deeper into the realm of sheer stupidity in which legislation is being used to destroy human beings and to create robots. Are you offended? Be offended if you wish. I am offended by high levels of mental retardation that I have witnessed in British courts.



 

Nazi: Constant use of words associated with a given period of history creates a continuity

Nazi: Constant use of words associated with a given period of history creates a continuity

Nowadays, and despite the fact that World War Two happened in the first half of the Twentieth Century, those who continue to use the world Nazi are de-facto promoting the ideas that led to World War Two.

Hardly a day goes by without Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Movement being remembered because the mass media, political elites and a wide range of organisations that say that they oppose Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Movement are in fact promoting Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Movement by constantly reminding everybody that there was a National Socialist Movement.

In the USA, in the UK, in Germany, in Austria, in Poland, in Israel and even in some remote Asian country, the memories of Adolf Hitler and of the National Socialist Movement are being kept alive and if Adolf Hitler was alive today he would be puzzled by the fact that so many people that say that they would be against him are keeping him ever-present everywhere.

Because this is done on an industrial basis and 24/7, the probability of the rise of another National Socialist Movement growths exponentially as more and more people become disenchanted with what is on offer today in terms of political alternatives. The more people distrust Liberals and Marxist, the more attractive a National Socialist option becomes.

Democracies are by no means perfect but they are made worse by huge amounts of corruption, incompetence and uncertainty at a time when more and more people want certainty in a very uncertain world and this is exactly what led to the rise of National Socialism in Germany. The uncertainties in a country battered by war and by the consequences of war and of the Versailles Treaty led to the meteoric rise of the NSDAP that in 1933 took the reins of power in Germany. The more the political elites, the mass media and other interested operators talk against National Socialism the more attactive National Socialism becomes.

In Britain today,. people are being taken to court and being accused of extremism using anti-Terror Laws and what is the word used to catalogue them? Even in circumstances and events that have little or nothing to do with National Socialism, you can bet that certain labels will be used. Even Liberal politicians including democratically elected Presidents are being labelled with terms linked to World War Two and this helps maintain the memories of World War Two.