Harry Windsor's profile will surpass Diana's popularity and the popularity of the British Royal Family

 

Harry Windsor's popularity will rise exponentially leaving all others royals far behind, including Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

While other royals talk about it, Harry will be actually doing it and will be doing in plain view of the entire world as chief impact officer of an organisation that provides professional coaching, mental health advice and learning for personal development. 

The Prince has also signed multimillionary contracts providing content for Spotify and Netflix that automatically make him a household name both in the UK and overseas. 

This comes as a continuation of his role as founder of Invictus Games, an event for injured or sick army personnel by using sports as a factor for their psychological and physical recovery. The Prince also founded Sentebale, a charity that supports the mental health and wellbeing of young people affected by HIV in Africa.

For those talking about revamping the image of the Royal Family, the present royal dispute was a gigantic lost opportunity for an ailing Monarchy to shine once again.Silicon Valley tech firms have been the drivers of an international revolution that vastly surpasses the impact of old habitual pomp and circumstance.

The Royal Household has contracted the services of a private enterprise to deal with the issue of racism, but it has been left stranded behind an individual that is prone to go where no man has gone before. Prince Harry doesn't need to explain that he is no racist nor does he have to contract any private contractor to deal with the stigma of racism. No one can now say that he is leaving thanks to subsidies paid by the State. "Sorry folks, keep your monies. I will make my own monies."

In 1776, the American colonies declared themselves independent from the British Empire. In 2021, an heir of the British Crown has declared himself independent from the British Royal Family and is making his way from America towards the world.

 

  

 

Harry and Meghan: How Royal Family advisers are destroying the Royal Family

 

When Diana died, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II did not manage to read the public mood. Driven by tradition, she could not understand the new world that was open right in front of her. She had to be told to come out and grieve with the rest of the nation.

Not in a million years could the Royal Family have imagined or conceived the idea that Harry would end up marrying outside the circle of 'acceptability'. Every gesture, every word, every statement made about fairness and equality and open-ness were now going to be tested to the limit. 

In years past, the Royal Family faced a huge challenge when a King - Edward VIII, Prince of Wales - was told in no uncertain terms that he could not remain as King as long he wanted to marry an American divorcee. Decades later, Prince Charles, first heir to the Throne, married a divorcee after the catastrophic end of his marriage to Princess Diana. Had the trauma of Edward VIII's abdication been avoided, history would have been radically different not just for Britain, but also for Europe and the world as a whole.

To say that the Royal Family has been under close scrutiny is one of the biggest understatements of all times. The Royal Family is not just under scrutiny because of the Charles and Diana saga. The behaviour of Prince Andrew in terms of his personal life and of his commercial dealings involving National Security has not done the Royal Family any favours. The feud created by the way they have dealt with Harry and Meghan has extremely serious connotations. In the USA, the R word has already been mentioned and the question has already been uttered. Are Harry and Meghan being treated as they are being treated because Meghan is mixed race? The whole affair could have critical geopolitical repercussions i.e. the Commonwealth.

All the efforts made to market the Royal Family as modern, openminded, tolerant and well suited for the Britain of the Twenty-First Centurity look and feel now like a complete waste of time. The divide between the Royal Family and the new multicultural and multiracial Britain is growing wider and wider. In the struggle, Harry and Meghan have come to represent David while the Royal Family is unquestionably seen as Goliath.

Royal Advisers have tried to destroy Harry and Meghan. They went after their public image using public humiliation as a tool. There are accusations about bullying and most recently about improper use of the charity status. This will go on and on and at every step a new bit will be chopped away damaging the Royal Family and turning the Royal Family into a figure of hatred and public disgust. William will be made to represent the old and corrupt establishment with its privileges and veils of secrecy while Harry will be the Champion of ordinary people who stood on his two feet againt the tyranny imposed by the Establishment. Of the two brothers, Harry will be Diana's legitimate heir and we know whom public opinion will support.

 

 

Royal biographer: family feud worse than we thought

The Daily Mail publishes today an article in which it is clearly stated that the Royal family feud is 'worse that we thought' and the latest example came on Remembrance Day when Prince Harry's request for a wreath to be laid on his behalf at the Cenotaph was rejected. On the same article it is stated that Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth was not informed about the request and therefore it is logical to conclude that somedy else made the decision to reject Prince Harry's request. If the Monarch herself was not informed then Queen Elizabeth II is Monarch only by name. Prince Harry has been classed as expendable.

The time is coming when a new King will be rising to the throne. Who will it be? Charles or William? If the Monarchy is supposed to represent family values, William would be the new King, because Charles got married and continued an adulterous relationship with Camila - a married woman. 

The Royal Family has come to represent many of the things that are wrong in Britain.

 

Diana and Camila: A PR exercise that wasn't going to last

 

Once again, an old affair that happened in 1995 is being brought back to public attention. The whole issue was about the fact that Charles and Camila - a married woman - had been an issue for a very long time, but Camila could not possibly be the mother of the heirs to the throne. Therefore, they found a nice face and used her as a cow to procreate the heirs that the Monarchy needed.

I reckon that the greatest humiliation for a  young woman was the knowledge that she would be second to an older adulterous married woman that had children of her own.

She played her role to perfection becoming an icon to embellish the image of a Monarchy that rested on the shoulders of a single man. The charade could not last. Fed up of being second fiddle, she went out in search of her own life. The interview with Bashir didn't reveal anything that wasn't public knowledge already. She was the pretty face for the cameras while Charles and Camila were at it. 

What angered the Establishment was not the fact that there were affairs. What angered the Establishment is that the interview exposed in public for all to see what had been going on. They set out to destroy her and the paparazzi were just the tool to led her to an abrupt end. After a public display of crocodile tears, they brought in Camila as the wife of the heir to the throne.

William was trained to play his role and Harry was left in the cold. When Harry met Meghan, thyey mounted yet another PR exercise. Meghan was a single woman who had her own life and was not willing to play second fiddle. When Meghan publicly showed that she was not going to play by the old rules, they turned against Meghan. 

Who is behind yet another attemp to rubbish the image of Diana? Diana died in 1997, so they turned against the journalist that interviewed her in 1995.

Royal Household: Harry and Meghan

Royal Household: Harry and Meghan

In the 1930, Prince Edward could not marry Wallis Simpson because she was a divorcee. After that, Princess Margaret was not allowed to marry the man she very much loved - an ace of the Royal Air Force who served with distinction because his wife had left him (he became a divorcee due to no fault of his own). 

These were the precedents, but year later Prince Charles who had been a lover of Camila Parker Bowles was allowed to marry Camila Parker Bowles and suddenly divorce was no longer an issue. 

There had not been an issue either when it came to public morality that the Lord Mountbatten was married and slept with young boys while his wife slept around with men including foreign dignataries. 

But somehow in the eyes of the mandarins of mass media Harry and Meghan have committed a mortal sin by wanting to live their own lives in their own way. They are poisoning the minds of members of the public in the same way that they killed Princess Diana - Harry's mother.  They are at it again. The prostitutes that like to call themselves Defenders of Free Speech are no better than an organised Mafia making an awful amount of money by means of fabricated scandals.