Harry and Meghan: How Royal Family advisers are destroying the Royal Family

 

When Diana died, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II did not manage to read the public mood. Driven by tradition, she could not understand the new world that was open right in front of her. She had to be told to come out and grieve with the rest of the nation.

Not in a million years could the Royal Family have imagined or conceived the idea that Harry would end up marrying outside the circle of 'acceptability'. Every gesture, every word, every statement made about fairness and equality and open-ness were now going to be tested to the limit. 

In years past, the Royal Family faced a huge challenge when a King - Edward VIII, Prince of Wales - was told in no uncertain terms that he could not remain as King as long he wanted to marry an American divorcee. Decades later, Prince Charles, first heir to the Throne, married a divorcee after the catastrophic end of his marriage to Princess Diana. Had the trauma of Edward VIII's abdication been avoided, history would have been radically different not just for Britain, but also for Europe and the world as a whole.

To say that the Royal Family has been under close scrutiny is one of the biggest understatements of all times. The Royal Family is not just under scrutiny because of the Charles and Diana saga. The behaviour of Prince Andrew in terms of his personal life and of his commercial dealings involving National Security has not done the Royal Family any favours. The feud created by the way they have dealt with Harry and Meghan has extremely serious connotations. In the USA, the R word has already been mentioned and the question has already been uttered. Are Harry and Meghan being treated as they are being treated because Meghan is mixed race? The whole affair could have critical geopolitical repercussions i.e. the Commonwealth.

All the efforts made to market the Royal Family as modern, openminded, tolerant and well suited for the Britain of the Twenty-First Centurity look and feel now like a complete waste of time. The divide between the Royal Family and the new multicultural and multiracial Britain is growing wider and wider. In the struggle, Harry and Meghan have come to represent David while the Royal Family is unquestionably seen as Goliath.

Royal Advisers have tried to destroy Harry and Meghan. They went after their public image using public humiliation as a tool. There are accusations about bullying and most recently about improper use of the charity status. This will go on and on and at every step a new bit will be chopped away damaging the Royal Family and turning the Royal Family into a figure of hatred and public disgust. William will be made to represent the old and corrupt establishment with its privileges and veils of secrecy while Harry will be the Champion of ordinary people who stood on his two feet againt the tyranny imposed by the Establishment. Of the two brothers, Harry will be Diana's legitimate heir and we know whom public opinion will support.

 

 

Royal biographer: family feud worse than we thought

The Daily Mail publishes today an article in which it is clearly stated that the Royal family feud is 'worse that we thought' and the latest example came on Remembrance Day when Prince Harry's request for a wreath to be laid on his behalf at the Cenotaph was rejected. On the same article it is stated that Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth was not informed about the request and therefore it is logical to conclude that somedy else made the decision to reject Prince Harry's request. If the Monarch herself was not informed then Queen Elizabeth II is Monarch only by name. Prince Harry has been classed as expendable.

The time is coming when a new King will be rising to the throne. Who will it be? Charles or William? If the Monarchy is supposed to represent family values, William would be the new King, because Charles got married and continued an adulterous relationship with Camila - a married woman. 

The Royal Family has come to represent many of the things that are wrong in Britain.

 

Diana and Camila: A PR exercise that wasn't going to last

 

Once again, an old affair that happened in 1995 is being brought back to public attention. The whole issue was about the fact that Charles and Camila - a married woman - had been an issue for a very long time, but Camila could not possibly be the mother of the heirs to the throne. Therefore, they found a nice face and used her as a cow to procreate the heirs that the Monarchy needed.

I reckon that the greatest humiliation for a  young woman was the knowledge that she would be second to an older adulterous married woman that had children of her own.

She played her role to perfection becoming an icon to embellish the image of a Monarchy that rested on the shoulders of a single man. The charade could not last. Fed up of being second fiddle, she went out in search of her own life. The interview with Bashir didn't reveal anything that wasn't public knowledge already. She was the pretty face for the cameras while Charles and Camila were at it. 

What angered the Establishment was not the fact that there were affairs. What angered the Establishment is that the interview exposed in public for all to see what had been going on. They set out to destroy her and the paparazzi were just the tool to led her to an abrupt end. After a public display of crocodile tears, they brought in Camila as the wife of the heir to the throne.

William was trained to play his role and Harry was left in the cold. When Harry met Meghan, thyey mounted yet another PR exercise. Meghan was a single woman who had her own life and was not willing to play second fiddle. When Meghan publicly showed that she was not going to play by the old rules, they turned against Meghan. 

Who is behind yet another attemp to rubbish the image of Diana? Diana died in 1997, so they turned against the journalist that interviewed her in 1995.