Labour: Rachel Reeves in tears as the marriage might not last long

 

It is usually said that an image speaks a thousand words. The image of the Chancellor of the Exchequer in tears tells the story of a marriage that might not last long.

If Rachel Reeves goes, the honeymoon is over. The marriage is under enormous stress barely one year after the May 2024 General Election. The knives are being sharpened. Despite the fact that Angela Rayner stated on television that "she has no intention to replace Keir Starmer", a rebellion of not less than 128 MPs is no mean business. Moreover, many of those now standing as Independent used to be Labour Party MPs.

Things are more serious than they actually look. Several Muslim MPs now standing as Independents used to be Labour Party MPs. This means than sooner than later we are going to see a new political party defined along religious and ethnic lines. Ethnic voters are turning against the Labour Party. Blacks and Asians no longer see the Labour Party as their natural home. Actions taken by the official Labour Party in matters concerning geopolitics are not very popular. Ethnic voters have no reason to swear allegiance to a white Metropolitan Labour Party that leans in favour of Israel, despite what amounts to genocide and mass murder.

Going against the vulnerable and supporting violations of basic human rights, the present Labour government is digging its own grave.

Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist who hated plastics - Irony and reality

 

Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist who hated plastics

The Führer Adolf Hitler was practically a vegetarian and an environmentalist that stuck to traditional building materials and hated plastics. He was a very practical man that thought that quality was better than quantity. In fact, he strived to improve demographic standards by getting rid of faulty people that had become a burden for the rest of society.

"If you are not fit for purpose, my dear, you should not exist." Overcroding in prisons? Mentally and/or physically challenged? Homosexuals? Alcoholics? No way. Get rid of the lot of them and you will have a stronger people.

Whatever your views, you must recognize the fact that if people are healthy, fit and able to be productive you will have a stronger people and stronger country. Men passing for women with painted nails, skirts and making funny voices? To the wall. Women behaving like men and disregarding their role as women and creators of life? To the wall. Multiculturalism? Diversity? What is that? Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer and rabbits with rabbits and foxes with foxes. No funny business. 

Migrants crossing the Rhein to get into Germany without documents? Really? Use them as targetting practice to train the Wehrmacht. German Police kneeling down on the streets? Really? The one accommodation that they would get - if they got any - would be a cell controlled by the Geheime Staadtpolizei or other temporary accommodation before being put into warmer surroundings.

Look around any country of the so called civilized world? What do you see? 

For decades, people have celebrated the triumph over National Socialist Germany. What are they celebrating? Humanity lost the war. Look what Humanity is becoming. More than 8 billion people, most of which are mentally and/or physically challenged, corrupted by so called Progressive Ideology, seas full of plastic that we humans are eating everyday, a throwaway society that is poisoning the environment and destroying habits. My darlings, Humanity lost World War Two. The issue was not how many millions died. The issue has been how many bastards were left behind that should not have been left behind. We have quantity that is overpowering quality.

Do you know one thing that is growing? The number of inmates that leads to the building of more and more prisons. The almost totality of those who go to jail come out of jail to go back to jail. The number of families or women who are not fit for purpose procreating children that will follow the trends of depravity and despair grows at a steady pace. Dysfunctionality comes to mind. And we justify such trend with the words 'Human Rights'. The words Human Rights are used for many things as a justification for depravity and all kinds of abuses. Societies in crisis? I wonder why.

 

EU, Turkey, Greece and other conflicts are clear examples of the mess the world is in

EU, Turkey, Greece and other conflicts are clear examples of the mess the world is in

Conventions on Human Rights? Universal Declarations? Not worth the paper they are written on. Wherever you look, the world is a state of flux. Chaotic situations and golf post that keep changing NATO is no more than the direct consequence of widespread corruption. Dwight Einsenhower alerted about the dangers of the weapons industries becoming all two powerful.

Where there is no conflict, conflicts are created to allow the blood spilling industries to prosper. Look at the Americas, at Africa, at the Middle East and Asia Minor, at Asia itself. Of each conflict the direct consequence is massive flows of displaced populations that are used as pawns. Suddenly, border fences are erected and desperate people end up being killed. 

The present chaos cannot go on forever without causing war between other countries and Europe must get ready for war. This is not going to end up well. The very existence of NATO and of the UN, two organisations born out of World War Two, is being threatened. The Twenty-First Century is not the Twentieth Century and we find outself totally unprepared to deal with new challenges.   

Catalonia: A historical insight into what led to the present crisis

Catalonia: A historical insight into what led to the present crisis

Eduardo Mendoza provides a different angle - a pragmatic non partisan approach - to what has led to present events in Spain and in Catalonia. The author, born in Barcelona in 1943, states in the book "Qué está pasando en Cataluña?"(What is happening in Catalonia?) deals with cetain historical assumptions that tend to distort perceptions of what is actually happening. He also deals with cultural aspects of Catalonia, immigration and how immigration has shaped up today's Catalonia and in end comes to the issue of independence of Catalonia.

Eduardo Mendoza clearly explains why he wrote what he wrote refering to those who are in favour of independence and those who are against independence:

"No lo he escrito para posicionarme en un bando o en otro. Personalmente, no me gusta ninguno de los dos, pero eso se puede atribuir a mi temperamento, a mis ideas y a mi experiencia personal. Lo he escrito para tratar de comprender lo que está pasando." (I haven't written it to take sides. Personally, I don't like neither, but this can attributed to my temperament, to my ideas and to my personal experience. I have written it to try to understand what is happening." 

Although I don't completely agree with some of the statements made by Eduardo Mendoza, the book provides a valuable analysis to deal with the complexities of the subject. When you deal with the history of Spain and of Catalonia nothing is black or white and over-simplication can lead to fundamental errors. Eduardo Mendoza states that although the Spanish Civil has something to do with what is happening today there are other more relevant factors dating from Post-Franco Spain. 

"Francisco Franco fue un criminal de guerra, un dictador y un político astuto y mediocre, pero su importancia histórica y su influencia han sido magnificadas." (Francisco Franco was a war criminal, a dictator and an astute and mediocre politician, but his political importance and his influence have been exaggerated.) By saying this, the author indicates that thinking that everything that happens today was due to the Civil War and Franco's regime is in itself an exaggeration. 

During the Civil War and after the Civil War, Catalonia was not a monolithical unit. Some Catalans sided with Franco and some Catalans sided with the Republic. Catalonia itself was divided across socio-economic classes. In principle, Catalonia didn't want independence. Catalonia wanted to recover its lost freedoms, an amnesty for those who had been incarcerated and those who had been forced to leave the country and the restoration of its autonomous government.

The book plublished by Seix Barral in 2017 is a brief, but right to the point analysis for those seeking to comprehend present realities of Catalonia and of Spain. 

It must be remembered that the book was published long before recent political events in Catalonia and in Spain under a Socialist Prime Minister that seems to have lost control. Excessive use of force and long jail sentences for elected representatives of the Catalonian people are reminders of the fact that repression is neither exclusively left wing or exclusively right wing. It happens under any ideology. What is shocking is that today it is happening in what is considered to be democratic Spain.

New Zealand: Prime Minister out of her depth regarding an issue that she doesn't seem to understand

New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

New Zealand: Prime Minister out of her depth regarding an issue that she doesn't seem to understand

If we kiss them and hug them and dress like them, they will love us. Mmmm.... not really. The tragedy of Christchurch was followed with big numbers by the tragedy of Sri Lanka perpetrated by Muslims that according to Security Services studied in the United Kingdom and Australia. Highly educated individuals that benefited from Western advantages went on the rampage against Christians bombing churches and touristic facilities as 'retaliation'. 

No amount of kissing, hugging and dressing will prevent what happened both in New Zealand and in Sri Lanka and is happening in other countries and continents. In France, there is an epidemic of attacks against Christian churches. When not bombing, they are raping and killing in other ways.

Harry Robertson writes an article entitled "UK is Islamic finance hub of the West", published by a local finance and business newspaper. In 2017, £4.7 billion in assets were managed from London and if we consider numbers worldwide we would be talking about 2.4 trillion US Dollars. How much of that money is used to finance the operations of extremists around the world?

Britain is a world hub for terrorism. Britain is a source of know how and training for terrorism. Or to use another word, Britain is the Mecca for "wishing to be terrorists" because Britain is being used to launch attacks abroad.

They use British passports to move around and they have benefited of what Britain has to offer to put Britain on a very bad light. After killing or supporting those who kill innocent men, women and children they then turn and claim that their Human Rights are being violated.

To say that we need to control British borders is one of the greatest understatements of all times. British citizens involved in Islamic Terrorism should be given the following choices: 1) you can resign your British citizenship and never set foot again on British soil or 2) you can keep your British citizenship and be convicted and executed for treason.

European Convention on Human Rights: What we know and what we don't know

European Convention on Human Rights: What we know and what we don't know

The levels of lack of awareness about fundamental pieces of legislation is a matter of great concern.

We hear politicians and the mass media mentioning the European Convention on Human rights on a regular basis but how much is known about it?

When it comes to the business of what is legal and what is illegal there is quite a lot of grey areas generated by legislation that is often used to circumvent the European Convention on Human Rights and this is why in certain political sectors there is growing interest in having a British Bill of Rights to deal with the said grey areas.

There is no point in having such important pieces of legislation when the number of loopholes makes it impossible to proceed to its full implementation. Conventions and Treaties end up being no more than the expression of aspirations that cannot be implement in the real world.

London: The number of victims of Moderate Islam keeps growing

Aysha Frade is one of the latest victims of Moderate Islam. The mother of two was slaughtered yesterday close to the Houses of Parliament where Libtards and Lefttards Members of Parliament and their acolytes continue to promote the so called Religion of Peace.

"We must be more like they are", they say. So maybe we should all drive cars into crowds and stab Police officers in front of the House of Parliament. What do you think? Or we should detonate bombs inside underground trains and on buses. Or we should stab elderly Catholic priests in French churches. Or we should go around raping women and children across Europe. Or we should go around beheading people in the name of Sharia Law. Would such actions make us be as the ones they seek to protect?

The Politically Correct Society protects the enemies of Western Civilisation talking about Human Rights. What about the Human Rights of the victims of Muslim attacks?

And the you have statesmen like President Erdogan saying: Europeans will not be safe on European streets or Turkish newspapers reminding Netherlands that it only has about 40,000 soldiers while there are more than 400,000 Turks living in Netherlands. Aren't such statements a declaration of war against ordinary law abiding European people?