Humza Yousaf: an earthquake in Scottish politics and UK politics

 

Humsa Yousaf: an earthquake in Scottish politics and UK politics

From Alex Salmond, through Nicola Sturgeon to Humza Yousaf, the SNP was a different SNP every step of the way. The surge of the Alba Party was part of this voyage.

Practically from the very beginning, Alex Salmond was telling us that Scotland could be independent and self-financing with Scottish oil and gas resources. That was his fighting card. 

The arrival of Nicola Sturgeon (and of her husband now facing fraud charges) made people believe that Nicola Sturgeon could get things done and she was the darling of the mass media until her fall that some say was motivated by pressures related to a fraud investigation. She also made the ill fated decision to have a coalition with the Green Party that brought in very unsavoury policies in terms of energy and of gender politics, something that was questioned outright by Scottish voters that started to turn their backs on the SNP.

Events outside the United Kingdom and markedly the crisis in the Middle East had a negative impact, once again, because the ethnicity and religion card has been played over and over again. The Zionist Movement could not possibly accept a Muslim leader, critical of events in the Middle East. So the fall of Humza Yousaf has been caused by a cocktail of reasons and the choice of a new leader will tells in which direction Scotland is moving and in which direction British politics is moving with Muslim increasingly disenchanted that do not trust that there is a valid expression of their views and needs in British politics.

There are already signs that in the future British politics will be about ethnic politics and very little about real British needs. Angela Merkel, speaking about Germany, publicly said 'Multikulti ist tot' (Multiculturalism is dead). The same will now apply to British politics. 

Tommy Robinson: Manipulation is the art of having somebody do what you want without getting publicly involved

Message sent to a Zionist organisation in London and referred to Members of Parliament including members of the British government, the Opposition, the Muslim Council of Britain and mass media including Lizzie Dearden, writer for The Independent thas has been involved in reporting about Tommy Robinson, and also sent to the Metropolitan Police in London that been repeatedly involved in actions involving public rallies and demonstrations and the courts. 

"Dear Sir/Madam,

Tommy Robinson standing on an IDF tank is Israel and then they tell you that he is not one of them. Ah, look! He is holding a gun. How many non-Jews would be allowed to hold a war gun standing on an IDF tank in Israel? What you tell us in London goes against factual information. At every rally, there have been Zionists supporting Tommy Robinson and his anti-Muslim messages.  During his courts trials, Zionists have been very visible supporting Tommy Robinson and Israeli flags have accompanied every single rally in support of Tommy Robinson. Those organising and supporting Tommy Robinson’s rallies at the highest level are Jewish: Israeli Jews and non-Israeli Jews.

Perhaps you could come up with a coherent, consistent and plausible explanation. I copy this message to the Muslim Council of Britain. I reckon they also deserve an explanation.

Perhaps you can also offer an explanation to the Metropolitan Police and to other Police forces in the UK that have spent a huge amount of resources policing rallies that you supported while promoting animosity against Muslims in the United Kingdom.

You throw a rock, you hide your hands behind your back and claim to be innocent.

Best regards

Karl Hohenstauffen"

Undoubtedly, members of the public have been taken for a ride for a very long time and offered images that don't fit in with the narrative of certain organisations that use public perception for their own ends, ends that have little to do with their declared aims.

It is no coincidence that at a time when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that fully supports the Israeli Far Right is involved in pushing forward the agenda of a Greater Israel using ethnic cleansing to throw out Palestinians from the occupied territories, Zionist organisations are publicly attempting to distance themselves from individuals that have been useful to their cause. 

This happens also a time when more and more Jews are turning against Benjamin Netanyahu that has been visibly unable to win an outright majority in Israel and remain in power as a caretaker Prime Minister.

There is also the fact that as Prime Minister he has protection against the charges made against him by the Israeli Judiciary for serious cases of fraud in which his own wife is also signalled as being involved. Therefore the importance of fuelling the ongoing conflict producing killings and destruction is twofold: conflict and murder keep Benjamin Netanyahu in power and by the same token allows him to carry on with his agenda of ethnic cleansing.

Rachel Shabi, Jewish writer writing on The Independent, London, England, United Kingdom:  

As we count the toll and name the dead, the bloody, grinding narrative of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has switched from “simmering tensions” to “escalating violence”. Everyday violence is now part of Jerusalem life. You sense it when Palestinian residents of this holy city, treated with animosity and suspicion, are deafened by the maddening hum of Israeli surveillance helicopters, when they face routine stop-and-searches and arrests by border police and often violent harassment from Jewish settlers. It’s there in the increasing presence of those settlers, not just in the expanding group of settlements that ring Jerusalem, but also in Palestinian neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem and the Old City. It’s there in the hate mobs and the chants of “death to Arabs” that spill on to the city’s streets.

In the absence of a political framework, it’s inevitable that these “simmering tensions” will spasmodically escalate. For where else can the anger and unresolved disputes go if there are no political channels through which to mediate?

Political vacuums are opportunistically filled by extremists. In Jerusalem, hardline Jewish national-religious settler groups have taken their fight from the West Bank to the city’s holy sites. Temple Mount, or Haram al-Sharif – the beautiful walled compound in the Old City that is sacred to Jews and Muslims – has long functioned according to status quo agreements. Under these, Jews can visit but not pray at the sacred site, while the Western Wall, just underneath, is reserved for Jewish prayer. But in recent years, movements calling for Jewish prayer rights have repeatedly flouted the codes, causing tensions and disturbances at the compound.

To be clear, this is not a religious coexistence campaign; Jewish religious leaders have for centuries ruled against Jewish prayer at Temple Mount. Indeed, the aims of the settler-led movement for additional worshipping rights become more transparent when you hear how they want to destroy the Dome of the Rock and replace it with a third Jewish Temple.

This would be bad enough in itself, but such extremist national-religious groups, once fringe and marginal, are now powerful and mainstream, partly because they are supported and funded by the current, settler-endorsing Israeli coalition.

Rachel Shabi perfectly describes what is going on. Power in Israel has been taken over by Jewish Far Right Extremists, Far Right Extremists supported by Zionist branches across the world, the kind of people that support Tommy Robinson because what Tommy Robinson is doing in the United Kingdom is no different from what Zionists are doing in Israel and in the occupied territories. It is plainly obvious that they want to publicly distance themselves from Tommy Robinson for the sake of keeping appearances since Tommy Robinson has been defined as British Far Right and has a political past as former member of the British National Party and founder of other parapolitical movements. 

Organisations like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters also have a pro-Zionist narrative and include  as members former members of the British National Party and this goes to show that when they are useful to promote messages supporting aggression in the occupied territories they are conveniently used. When they don't need to use them they call the said individuals Nazi, Fascist, Terrorist and the like.  

Israel: Those who live by the sword die by the sword

 

The idea of a Promised Land turned into a nightmare

Even before 1948, the year when what we know as the State of Israel came to be, Palestine was in flames. Palestine was the possession of many empires including the Roman Empire and the Ottoman Empire. The Crusaders went to Palestine presumably to liberate it from the ones they called the Infidels - translation of those who professed another faith that wasn't their faith. Murder, rape, and destruction have for a very long time been common currency in Palestine and given what we know such lamentable state of affairs is not going to come to an end any time soon. Tonight, once again, violence has spread across Palestine. Peace in Palestine is never an ever lasting reality and, as always, those who live by the sword die by the sword. For centuries, Islam, Christianity and Judaism lived together without any formal state. Oh, yes, they were not always at war. The coexisted. Under British rule Palestine was a Protectorate and there was rule of law, but a precarious peace was not meant to last as events in Europe triggered a process that to put an end to the Protectorate and led to the partition of Palestine. 

Until the start of World War Two - officially started on September 3, 1939 - two days after Germany invaded Poland - National Socialist Germany was initially in favour of the idea of sending Jewish populations to Palestine and the so called Zionist Movement was very much in favour of it as they wanted Jews to go to what they called the Promised Land. But the start of World War Two frustrated many plans. 

By the end of World War Two, once again, the Zionist Movement renewed its efforts and finally in 1948 the partition of Palestine took place and the State of Israel was born, but not all Jews chose to go to Palestine. Many of those who were leaving Europe chose to go to other countries i.e. the USA. After what they had been through before the war and after the war, quite a few were not willing to face any more so much hardship. The State of Israel of 1948 was nothing compared to today's Israel as conflict after conflict the State of Israel took more and more land from its neighbours and expansion has never really stopped. Such expansion at the expense of local populations could only lead to confrontation and this is exactly what we are witnessing today.  Instead of an ever lasting peace, it has created an ever lasting war that has been affecting other parts of the world for a very long time.

Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters

The tragedy of so called British Nationalism is that some of those portraying themselves as British Nationalists are driven by arguments that have little to do with promoting British interests. Confusing arguments born out of desperation in an attempt to be politically meaningful.

In a conversation I had with Anne Marie Waters, the key issue was that meetings organised by Anne Marie Waters and those linked to Anne Marie Waters kept being cancelled or rejected indicating that those who own venues or manage venues don't wish to be associated with Anne Marie Waters.

In politics, perception is critically important. For Britan, has incorporated elements of the British National Party that were associated with the very same ideas that Anne Marie Waters says that she rejects. None other than Julian Leppert was elected Councillor representing the British National Party and now he represents For Britain as Councillor - their only Councillor.

It appears that Anne Marie Waters hasn't done her research properly. In a desperate attempt to build a power base, she has incorporated members of the Far Right that were and are directly linked to the very same things that she talks against. 

Here, Anne Marie Waters appears surrounded by prominent figures of the British National Party, including Eddy Butler, the mastermind of the British National Party electoral success in Barking and Dagenham that got 12 Councillor elected and one of the British National Party stalwarts that got Richard Barnbrook elected as Member of the London Assembly. She might persuade those who are not aware of the political background of her core supporters. I don't think that Anne Marie Waters is a naive individual. I think that she is being disingenous.

The comment made by a well-known political activist was 'I think that she was very badly advised to make a video attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative'. Mark Collett was also a prominent British National Party member.

Jeffrey Marshall, also a prominent British Party member, posed as a friend of Jewish Communities. Here he was at a Synagogue, wearing a yamaka and taking part in a religious ceremony.   

Most of the core members of For Britain, including the only elected representative (Julian Leppert), have one thing is common. They are all former members of the British National Party. What led Anne Marie Waters to publish a video directly attacking Patriotic Alternative? 

The British National Party is everywhere. It is in For Britain, in Patriotic Alternative and in Britain First as Paul Golding was also a prominent member of the British National Party. Many of those supporting Tommy Robinson - including Tommy Robinson himself - can be traced back to the British National party. In fact, For Britain and several other groups are the direct consequence of the fragmentation of the British National Party that went though a similar process as the National Front from which it derived.

Here you see Tommy Robinson at a British National Party meeting listening to Richard Edmonds. Was Tommy Robinson unaware of the ideas of Richard Edmonds who was a vital link with National Front? I have met Tommy Robinson quite a few times. I don't think that Tommy Robinson was or is a naive individual. He left the BNP and went on to join the English Defense League that is fervently anti-Islam. In 2013, he left the English Defense League, criticized EDL, but took over its anti-Islam platform that he shares with Anne Marie Waters.

In fact, all groups that came out of the British National Party and the British National Party itself share the anti-Islam platform. Fragmentation was not the consequence of ideological differences. Fragmentation was very much the consequence of personalities and internal feuds.

At practically all rallies in support of Tommy Robinson or Anne Marie Waters, you see Israeli flags. This would lead some operators to think that Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters are supporters of Zionists and of the State of Israel. Are they? How much do Jewish Communities actually support Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters?

In the muddy world of British politics, it is difficult to know who stands for what. This is why, regardless of any statements of Anne Marie Waters - as long as much of her power base is directly traceable to the British National Party - her attempts to disassociate herself from certain political platforms will not change public perception. 

Today, Britain is very much focused on the tragedy generated by Corona Virus. Most people don't have the time nor the inclination to engage in profound political analysis and the days in which so many are losing their lives do not seem to be the proper time to discuss certain political issues. When the present health crisis is hopefully over, I believe that Britain will be in many ways a different country.

To rebuild Britain, we will need real politicians working together for the common good. Those existing on the fringes of British politics, driven by personality feuds and empty slogans will be as irrelevant as ever before.

Plot to destroy Jeremy Corbyn

Plot to destroy Jeremy Corbyn

Zionists are out to destroy Jeremy Corbyn and this coincides with their agenda to prevent any criticism against the expansionist and colonialist policies of Benjamin Netanyahu who - incidentally - is wanted in Israel on corruption charges. But there is more.

Jeremy Corbyn has been instrumental for several decades to put a stop to policies of aggression that include the illegal invasion of Iraq that created Islamic State and completely destabilised the Middle East to the advantage of one country - namely Israel or the Jewish State of Israel as it is now called.

As if this was not enough to mobilise the Huns, Jeremy Corbyn has also called for a moderate and rational approach in Venezuela and this makes the America for the American Huns very angry since as they wanted to seize Iraqi oil they also want to seize Venezuela's oil and every single resource they can get their hands on by plotting against democratic governments, destabilising countries, creating violence to then justify putting in place an useful idiots that will allow them to do whatever they want with the resources of the conquered countries.

There is no coincidence. Looking at what has been happening in the Middle East and Asia Minor and now happening in Latin America the intention is self-evident. The warmongers don't want anybody to stand on their way. This is the geopolitical angle. Not, let's look at the national angle. For an embattled Conservative Party under Theresa May, this comes like hand in glove. Instead of talking about contract for ferry services provide by companies that have no ferry or about the messy business of the Home Office that might be about to produce yet another Windrush Scandal that could fatally wound Britain's reputation and literally destroy lives - the issue of the rights of EU citizens and the processing of applications that could lead to deportations from Britain with the rest of the EU replying in kind when it comes of UK citizens living in the EU.

The rights of UK and EU citizens is by far the most important issue because of the implications for both national and geopolitical reasons in terms of creating animosity between European countries. This is quickly brushed aside when convenience and short-termism are much of a priority.

If they cannot destroy the Labour Party in the polling stations, they will try and destroy the Labour Party in the courts in the very same manner that they have sought to destroy individuals and organisations that do not sing their tune. The struggle is not about Anti-Semitism. It has nothing to do with Anti-Semitism. This is about geopolitics, expansionism and colonialism and about silencing any kind of criticism.   

Hope Not Hate confirms that British Judiciary is controlled by Zionists

Hope Not Hate confirms that we knew all along: Zionists control the British Justice System. To make matters worse, on the very same day that Jez Turner was convicted the Zionist Army slaughtered 60 unarmed Palestinians including babies and injured more than 2,700 of a crowd of unarmed demonstrators against Jewish occupation in Palestine.

Hope Not Hate states that "the conviction is another setback for the group (London Forum)" but this is contradicted by views expressed by represented of many other nationalist groups that clearly stated that the conviction of Jez Turner is a unifying force for nationalist groups across Britain as this shows even the most moderate members of the Nationalist Movement that opposing Zionism in all its forms is an over-riding priority and objective.

Gideon Falter CAA

By his own admission, Gideon Falter - one of the heads of CAA (and reportedly linked to CIA), stated that he works very closely with 10 Downing Street and this could lead to major issues indicating that the separation of powers (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary) has been violated leading to the conclusion that Zionists used their influence at 10 Downing Street to pressure the Crown Prosecution Service that had initially disregarded accusations made against Jez Turner.

But there are other issues that are not less important and as crucial as the fact that Jews control mainstream political parties, influence mass media and put pressure on the Judiciary. A group called National Action that was recently banned is extremely active with participation of former and present members of the British Armed Forces that organised training camps for paramilitaries in various regions of the United Kingdom. Members of the British Armed Forces could decide to target Jewish interests directly. This is extremely serious and is being totally disregarded by British Authorities.

As we learn from incidents happening in Germany, Muslim immigrants are now turning against Jews and Jewish authorities in Germany have advised Jewish people not to wear any garments including skullcaps that could give away their Jewish identity. Rising anti-Jewish feelings is now one of the main concerns in Germany. As Zionists murderous activities in Palestine shock the world and send shock-waves across Europe, it is not unthinkable that Muslim operators could become increasingly aggressive against Jewish people in the United Kingdom and that the actions of Israel could be a unifying factor for several strands within Muslim communities in the United Kingdom.

Members of Jewish Communities are becoming increasingly concerned about the consequences of the actions of the government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likud Party and the potential consequences for Jews across the world.

Jez Turner: Who pulls the strings of some members of the British government

Who pull the strings of some members of the British government and uses British Courts to promote its own agenda?

Jez Turner is being targeted for a case that was dismissed by the Crown Prosecution Service and reinstated by the very same Crown Prosecution Service because of pressure exerted by a lobby on very visible figures of the British government.

CPS forced to consider a case about which the CPS initially said that no offense had been committed

As reported, Jez Turner – organiser of the London Forum – has been charged with “inciting racial hatred” in connection with his speech at the “Anti-Shomrim” rally in Whitehall on 4th July 2015.

The Zionist lobby group “Campaign Against Anti-Semitism” had brought a legal action to force the Crown Prosecution Service to bring charges against Mr Turner, even though the CPS had originally decided he committed no offence.

An initial hearing will be held at 1.30 pm on Monday 30th October at Westminster Magistrates Court, Marylebone, Central London.

What did he actually say? We are left none the wiser about what was actually said but what is fairly visible is that the Crown Prosecution Service that "originally decided that he committed no offense" is now forced by a Jewish extremist organisation to consider the case once more. If Justice means surrendering to an organisation that might well be acting against genuine Jewish interests, then Justice becomes persecution.

I would say that the said "Campaign Against Anti-Semitism" is actually Anti-Semitic because is generating ill will against innocent Jewish people who have no links whatsoever with the said organisation. Let us remember that Jewish Communities in the United Kingdom amount to about 269,568 people in a country that has more than 60 million people. How many members does Campaign Against Anti-Semitism have? 

Even the Labour Party that has campaigned against Anti-Semitism stands accused of being Anti-Semitic. Something is going very wrong. The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism lobby is as dangerous as Daesh or Islamic State or whatever you want to call it.

On Saturday (28 October 2017), I saw a demonstration carried out by the Black Lives Matter group. There were about 60 people gathered near Downing Street in Central London. This shows how relevant the said group is. The vast majority of the population of London, of whatever race and of whatever religion couldn't care less about a group like Black Lives Matter.  Why? Because people in Britain don't like extremists whether they are Zionist extremists or Black extremists, White extremists or Religious extremists.