Nick Lowles: From Searchlight to Hope Not Hate to.... with a penchant for Islamophobia
In 2016, the National Union of Students attempted to ban Nick Lowles to deny him a platform because he stood accused of Islamophobia. It has been reported that Nick Lowles is no longer the head of Hope Not Hate, in spite of the fact that articles signed by Nick Lowles are published by The Guardian.
If such penchant for Islamophobia happens to be true, then Nick Lowles would have joined the likes of Nick Griffin, Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson that - surprise, surprise - stand accused of Islamophobia.
 |
| Nick Lowles: Anti-Muslim campaigner? |
To have spent quite a few years as an 'Anti-Racist' campaigner, ending up being accused of Islamophobia like many of those active in the so called Far Right seems a bit of a fall from grace.
On this day and age, perhaps the Security Services using new legislation should ask him his pins and numbers of all his electronic devices to find out what he actually up to.
I wonder if Nick Lowles has any links with Moscow. Having links with Moscow was the reason why the Security Services detained Paul Golding at Heathrow Airport and took him away with handcuffs when Paul Golding refused to deliver his pins and passwords. Trump charges for terrorism were made against Paul Golding that will be in Westminster Magistrates Court on February 27th 2020 at 2:00 o'clock to answer against the said charges in what is nothing more than another piece political persecution.
The British mass media and some British politicians want you believe that we live in a free country, but unfortunately when somebody who has absolutely nothing to do with terrorism and stands against terrorism is arrested, manhandled and falsely accused, all illusions of being in a free country fall overboard.
Every single piece of repressive legislation - like a knife - can be used for the right reasons and for the wrong reasons. When Jacqui Smith, then Home Secretary under a Labour goverment, introduce anti-terror legislation, voices were raised to caution against the certain possibility that anti-terror legislation could be misused. Nick Lowles was more interested in demonising and harassing those he didn't like and not even paid lip service to public freedoms. What Nick Lowles should take into account is that he himself could be targetted with the tools he used against others. The Porno Home Secretary - she and her husband used to claim Parliamentary expenses for pornography videos - took an active party in putting aside Habeas Corpus and the Presumption of Innocence, making possible to detain individuals without access to legal counsel.
We live in a very strange world. Nowadays, regardless of ideology, race, gender, et cetera, you could end up in court accused of terrorism simply because you refuse to surrender access to your private information contained in electronic devices. We started fighting against terrorism and we ended up creating a terrorist state. And, once again, Nick Lowles was instrumental in the creation of a terrorist state.
