Showing posts with label Holocaust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Holocaust. Show all posts

Monday, 8 April 2024

World is ruled by force: Might is Right

 

From the very beginning, some people in Israel have sought inspiration on the pages of Mein Kampf - the political manifesto of Adolf Hitler.

Adolf Hitler stated very clearly in Mein Kampf that 'Might is Right' and Israel has followed this to the extreme.

If you can take it and keep it, it is yours. Looking at the map of 1948 and comparing the map of 1948 with what happened afterwards, it is plainly obvious that Israel follows the principles stated by Adolf Hitler.

Adolf Hitler stated that the winners will have nothing to prove or justify in terms of accountability as the winners will be accountable to no one and this is exactly what has been happening. Israel makes International Law as it goes along and completely ignores the International Community. Israel has maintained millions of peoples under occupation, carrying out ethnic cleansing, dispossession, and murder.

I doubt very much that this is what the forefathers of Israel actually wanted. Israel has been taken over by psychopaths and murderers whom, by their actions, are putting in danger millions of Jews across the world. They are the champions of Anti-Semitism and Anti-Jewish sentiments. They promote Anti-Semitism and Anti-Jewish sentiments. If you want to blame somebody for the rise of Anti-Semitism and Anti-Jewish sentiments across the world, blame those in authority in Israel and those outside Israel that support atrocities being committed by Israelis in the Middle East.

Eminent Jews that denounce the atrocities committed by the present Israeli government end up being attacked by psychopaths that rule Israel and their supporters.






Friday, 27 October 2023

Palestine: Labour goes to war

Multiculturalism? Diversity? Well, the Labour Party and usual supporter of mass migration now realises that it has been promoting war and violence in Britain. Reading comments written by Jews in the UK it is plainly visible that Jews talk about being targetted, about not walking outside their Jewish areas.

In fact, Britain has imported conflicts and now the said conflicts are going to be played out in Britain. Angela Merkel said it out loud: Multikulti ist tot. (Multiculturalism is dead.) Not that too many people managed to understand that the person saying it was none other than the one who had been promoting open borders for the European Union and taking countries to European courts for rejecting open borders.

Frauke Petry went as far as calling for migrants to be shot dead if they tried to enter Germany. Then somebody noticed what Frauke Petry said, but continued to ignore what Angela Merkel had said.

Britain has not built integration. Britain has built ghettos and whenever there is a geopolitcal crisis, those ghettos become alive. Suella Braverman does not have the common sense necessary to understand that she should not side with any of the parties in the conflict. A proposal to ban the Palestinian flag was a declaration of war against Muslim communities in Britain because in this conflict there are religious and ethnic factors that many are failing to understand.

As an outsider, I see the makings of Holocaust Round Two. As long as the USA continues to support a bankrupt Israeli government and its policies of occupation and oppression, Jews will never be safe. 

Now, we have got the Labour Party at war. Mayor of London: Muslim. Scottish First Minister: Muslim. Labout MPs left and right: Muslim. Labour Councillors already resigning. Firstly, Covid, Secondly, the European crisis and energy prices. Thirdly, Palestine. A never ending series of scandals and crisis.

If things get out of control, the years of the IRA will seem like Paradise.

Friday, 25 August 2023

Ukraine: promises sound good, but are they good?

Sitting in an office with the television set by my side watching the news, I suddenly was focused on a report coming from New York, USA, about the Twin Towers and airplanes crashing onto the sides of the towers and couldn't possibly imagine that just a few weeks later war was to arrive in Afghanistan, country that was to be subject to carpet bombing. The smoking mountains were on television screens across the world. Just about two years later came yet another disastrous event that was the invasion of Iraq that completely destabilized the Middle East causing wave after wave of refugees. There was Libya, Syria and so forth afterwards.

The present war in Ukraine has been going on for more than a year and there is every indication that it could go on and on, threatening to engulf Europe as a whole. I do remember the war in Yugoslavia, war that ended up with the end of Yugoslavia and that in more than one way led to expansion of NATO that created the present war in Ukraine.

Long before the present war, Ukraine was in trouble, unable to make ends meet, with internal upheaval and ethnic tensions. Western Ukraine did not love Eastern Ukraine very much and World War Two is ample evidence of it when one side of Ukraine supported National Socialist Germany and was very much involved in what we know as the Holocaust and Eastern Ukraine sided with the Allies. Paradoxically, history repeats itself following what happened in Yugoslavia. Croatia and Bosnia Herzegobina were on the side of National Socialist Germany. Heinrich Himmler used to boast about the fact that Muslims from Bosnia Herzegobina joined the SS and were 'good fighters'. It did not come as a surprise the fact that Germany was the first country to recognize an independent Croatia because, after all, Croatia was on the German side during World War Two.

What happens today in the Baltic Republics is no surprise either. SS officers remarked the cruelty of Lithuanians against Jews. They described the scenes of an execution carried out by Lithuanians against Jews. The Lithuanians killed Jewish men, women and children and after the execution they danced on top of the corpses playing accordions and singing.

One conflict after another seems to be waged against people who fought against National Socialist Germany. Yugoslavia was dismantled and all the focus was against Serbia that in two World Wars fought against Germany and Austria. Now the focus is against Eastern Ukraine and against the Russian Federation that as part of the then Soviet Union lost tens of millions of people fighting against National Socialist Germany.

But, going back to the title, how good are the promises and what is the real agenda? The real agenda is to weaken Europe and the USA is using the conflict in Ukraine to weaken Europe and threatening to destabilize Europe with the willing cooperation of European governments that seem all to eager to please warmongering lobbies with complete disregard for their own peoples. In their efforts, adulating politicians are getting rid of outdated equipment that even when it is outdated it will be difficult to replace. Denmark, Netherlands, Norway and others are not known for being military powers and even Germany that was kept under American domination is no military power at all. Warplanes are foreign made and bought from the shelf since Germany was not allowed to develop its war industries. The only pieces of equipment worth mentioning are the Leopard tanks and even so they have proven to be pretty useless in real combat.

Promises here and there and big speeches including speeches made by Ursula von der Leyen, the disastrous former German Defense Secretary and present head of the European Commission can only make a bad situation worse. Present German Chancellor Olaf Scholz talks both ways, sending equipment while expressing fears regarding the involvement of Germany in yet another war. 


Friday, 10 March 2023

Gary Lineker: Using the BBC for political agendas

 

For a long time, there has been criticism regarding BBC Superstars and the fact that they are overlypaid when the coorportation has been downsizing and cutting down services.

Not a year goes by without hearing announcements regarding services being cut off to save money and it is not any money. It is about money gathered because people most of whom do not watch the BBC are forced to pay under duress.

Despite the fact the he made a name because of football, Gary Lineker has very well known political views and political allegiances. If we want a BBC that is seen as impartial, Gary Lineker is not the best exponent of such impartiality and perhaps, and without perhaps, this led the BBC to make the decision not to allow the presenter to host a very public football programme. His twitter comments led to confrontation and even division between peoples that hold similar political views. Exponents of the Jewish Communities in the UK have shown that they are not happy - in some cases that they are deeply unhappy - to hear or see that the experiences of 70 or so years ago are being used for party political purposes in the United Kingdom. Is this a watershed moment? Are people tired enough of seeing words like Nazi, Fascist, Racist, Homophobe, Transphobe used to prevent any qualified debate about many of today's issues and ills?

Gary Lineker is not a Member of Parliament. Perhaps he should consider leaving the BBC, stopping being a sports presenter, and engage in politics full on. Then he could talk about politics using his own steam instead of using his presence as presenter of a public broadcaster to promote his views. It is become apparent that many communities in the United Kingdom are not happy when they are flooded with illegal immigrant centres and their local economies that were already in trouble before their hospitality industry was used for purposes that have nothing to do with the reasons why the hospitality industry was created. Calling disgruntled and desperate local communities Far Right or Racist is in itself a form of abuse. Local inhabitants become hostages of circumstances beyond their control. They become victims of decisions made by political groups that are not to have to cope with the repercusions of their decisions. 

What is happening in many local communities across the United Kingdom shows, once again, the disconnect between the well-off and the poorer segments of society. The said centres are not set up in well-off areas. The said centres are set up in the poorest areas of Britain. Rich Liberals and Champagne Socialists are condemning the poorest in Britain to live in conditions that Rich Liberals and Champagne Socialist would not want to live in.  

Friday, 16 December 2022

War in Europe: Wann wird man je verstehen?

 

War in Europe: Wann wird man je verstehen?

Listening to politicians, to the mass media and even to the present Head of Nato, one would believe that what happened in Europe 70 or so years ago never happened.


As the build up for yet another European-wide war continues, we see that the memories of World War Two are been flashed away to encourage the new generations to get involved in yet another war - and perhaps the final war for millennia to come as it is more than likely that nuclear weapons will be used to erase every single European capital. Talking about the merits of Democracy, what is happening right now speaks volumes against Democracy. Democracy is a political form of governance that gives a blank cheque to politicians to erase Humanity from planet Earth.

Politicians do not represent us and they simply use the powers given to them to do as they please and lead us towards Armageddon. Strikes happening right now in Britain, the state of upheaval in Britain, was created by catastrophic geopolitical decisions that led to economic instability that mixed with an arms race will not only cause instability, but will also push us towards extinction.

Those who remember what happened after Chernobyl - it was merely an accident that affected reactors at an energy plant - know full well what will happen if a Nuclear Holocaust is triggered intentionally. The entire continent will be uninhabitable for ages to come. Our way of life will be gone forever. Thousands of years of social and technological evolution will be wiped out. Whoever manages to survive will have to live in a human jungle without any rules. It will be about killing or being killed in a state of widespread lethal anarchy. This is Mad Max World.

We must prepare for a new world in which the weak will be naturally exterminated and natural selection will determine who lives and who dies, a world without mercy. In this new world, Charles Darwin's evolution rules will be more apparent than ever before. In a lawless world, only the strong and the most brutal will have the slightest chance to live another day. 

This was Germany by the end of World War Two. This might be Europe by the end of World War Three.


Tuesday, 8 February 2022

Alison Chabloz: How monies are being spent in court cases that serve no purpose whatsoever

 Alison Chabloz: How monies are being spent in court cases that serve no purpose whatsoever
For several years now, the English legal system has been used as a money making machine for private individuals and as money spending machine for British taxpayers in meaningless court cases that are not going to make things better.

If anything the legal circus is creating more problems and giving ammunition to groups that have as a given agenda the extermination of Jews across Europe including in Britain.

Jews and those who continue this legal circus more than 70 years after the presumed end of World War Two have made Adolf Hitler and his ideas immortal. Just a few days ago in Norway, Anders Breivik during an appeal sessson made a National Socialist salute and people across the world enjoyed the scene.

Some say that we are three weeks away from the start of yet another World War. Nobody rational would believe that should the conflict start in Ukraine it will stop in Ukraine. We know that given the policy of alliances, the conflict in all probability will spread like wildfire across the entire continent and this without taking into account that it could also trigger war in China as China would use this as a golden opportunity to implement its own agenda in Asia.

There are more than enough Far Right groups and Muslim groups in Europe to use the fog of war to go hunting Jews across Europe when countries are engulfed in a World War. What have been the mortal crimes committed by Alison Chabloz? She has written songs and expressed her views on radio programmes. If everybody who does not believe in the Jewish mantra of the Holocaust were to be imprisoned, more than half of the world's population would be in jail and history and especially after the presumed end of World War Two has not been favourable to Jews given the record of Israel and of certain very prominent individuals who have been constantly on the news.

The more people mention the persecution of Jews, the stronger the anti-Jewish movements become. The Jewish rhetoric feeds the anti-Jewish rhetoric in the same manner that the Muslim rhetoric feeds the anti-Muslim rhetoric and this is happening on a daily basis. The rhetorics about Jews and Muslism is mixed with vested interests and geopolitical interests and this is a deadly mix and wars are not the way to maintain social, economic and political stability.

Die Judenfrage is already being talked about and certain groups are rubbing their hands with glee. Chasing artists for writing songs and taking part in radio programmes will not save the idiots who are behind such harassment and persecution schemes. 


Sunday, 23 January 2022

Another Holocaust is coming

Far Right groups and Muslim Extremists are rubbing their hands with glee. In the fog of war Jews in Europe will be exterminated. This is catastrope and is almost upon is. War in Europe will create fertile ground for it to happen.

British military history is not free from tragic examples of delusion leading to catastrophic events. The Narvik campaign is just one of them when forces went to Narvik without air cover, without artillery, without naval cover and without the necessary winter equipment only to be slaughtered by the Wehrmacht from sea, air and land, event that led to the fall of the government of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.

Another example of delusion was the sending of two naval units to Asia, once again without air cover, to be sunk by Japanese torpedo aircraft or the bad arrangements in Singapore that led to the fall of Singapore with the arrival of British and Commonwealth troops that only arrived in time to surrender to Japanese troops.

Another example of delusion was the badly planned campaign in the Netherlands by Marshall Montgomery known as Market Garden that was bound to be a disaster with the delivery of Polish paratroopers on the third day that were killed before they set foot in the Netherlands and supplies that were thrown straight into the hands of the Wehrmacht due to lack of proper communications.

Never mind the failed Suez Campaign launched by Anthony Eden or Churchill Gallipoli Campaign.

More recent disasters were the campaign in Afghanistan and in Iraq launched by Tony Blair under false pretences with fabricated evidence about WMDs that never existed and created massive waves of refugees, destabilizing even more regions like Asia Minor and Middle East that were already unstable leading to the rise of Islamic State and events that are well known.

But now we are dealing with an even more worrying situation when Britain is about to engage in a military conflict that could engulf the whole of Europe under a government that has systematically reduced the strength both in terms of material resources and of numbers of the British Armed Forces. How on Earth are we talking about cutting down the numbers of the British Armed Forces a time when everybody is talking about impending doom?

Simon Jenkins writing on The Guardian spoke about how unwise it would be to commit Britain to a military effort in Ukraine and a lady writer writing on The Independent asked the question about American attempts to drive the Russian Federation to a war that the Russian Federation does not want.

How many times is Britain going to make the same kind of disastrous mistakes that lead to tragedy? How many times politicians that should be in a privileged position to prevent a catastrophe act as if they were completely unaware of the consequences? Reports about British cooperation with Ukraine are laughable. Do you really believe that a few anti-tank weapons will prevent an assault by a country that drove the Wehrmacht across Europe all the way back to Berlin? Do you know the history of the Soviet Union of which the Russian Federation was the real driver? Do you think that wars can be won without committing troops on the battlefield?

People in Britain should be told what will really happen if a military conflict in Europe begins because their children are going to be sent to the battlefield to die as children died before in many wars like the First World War and the Second World War. As Sergei Ivanov stated, if there is a conflict you can forget about the Nuclear Deterrent and about ‘weapons of pinpoint accuracy’. This will be a military conflict that will engulf Europe and it will be a protracted war that will make the Afghanistan campaign and the Iraqi campaign look like child’s play.

As always, we hear about the green agenda and the rising costs of energy that can certainly cripple many European economies including the British economy. What do you think the effects of a widespread conflict in Europe will be when it comes to energy supplies and the link with inflationary forces? What do you think the social and political consequences will be if economies become critically unstable to the point when there are very unwanted developments?

When Germany was falling 70 or so years ago, Adolf Hitler prophesized the rise of a new Germany when the two colossus of the time – America and the Soviet Union – were to face each other on the battlefield. Do you know that there are groups in Europe that are rubbing their hands with glee thinking about what they will do if there is war in Europe? For decades now, Europe has been dealing with the scourge of Islamic Extremists. Can you imagine a Europe in which both Islamic Extremists and Far Right elements will have a free hand to do whatever they please because governments will be involved in fighting a European war?

It is not just about being sensible and realistic. It is about not guaranteeing what cannot be guaranteed. It is about avoiding pompous and affected statements that are a far cry away from reality. It is about mass media control not to create an environment leading to war, environment that could lead to reprisals in the United Kingdom. In the event of war, it will take very little for people to start hunting people in the United Kingdom. I have heard people in the UK say that war in Europe is being promoted by Jews in the United Kingdom. I listen to people, and I am concerned about the consequences. I have a dialogue with a Jewish friend in Nevada, USA and we speak about situations happening in Europe right now that are being treated as black and white, as cowboys and Indians, with political postures that could lead to a massive tragedy.

If attitudes in some circles in the West don’t change for the better, we could be faced with very foreseeable consequences.

Monday, 18 February 2019

Peter Rushton: Badly misinformed about the character of English Law

Peter Rushton: Badly misinformed about the character of English Law

Once again, Peter Rushton has been found wanting on the pages of Heritage and Destiny. Under the title "Chabloz succeeds in criminalizing Holocaust denial", Peter Rushton blatantly shows that he knows very little about English Law in this regard.

As a matter of fact, Holocaust denial is not a crime in English Law and therefore nothing of what happened last week at Southwark Crown Court changes such fundamental fact.

If Mr Rushton had bothered to show up during the three days of the deliberations at Southwark Crown Court he would have been able to produce a better report of what happened at Southwark Crown Court.

Mr Rushton then writes about the ill informed views of Richard Edmonds about the trial.

That’s because the earlier court judgment could not set a precedent: it applied only to Ms Chabloz’s particular case. Richard Edmonds warned in an article for the Heritage & Destiny website published on January 2nd – ‘Does Alison Chabloz know what she’s doing? Or criminalising “Holocaust”-revisionism by the back door’. Mr Edmonds’ warning has been fully vindicated this week.
He wrote:
“This is not the case with the findings of a Crown Court. It is not impossible that should in February Ms. Chabloz lose her appeal at Southwark Crown Court, then her case, involving as it does elements of the so-called ‘Holocaust’, could be used as a legal precedent to launch criminal prosecutions against Historical revisionists by the back-door, so to speak, in the absence of any formal laws in Britain banning ‘Holocaust’-denial.”
Once again, Richard Edmonds himself shows lack of acumen regarding the legal process and makes assumptions that are not based on fact. Richard Edmonds is writing about something he didn't witness and knows very little about.

Unfortunately, Peter Rushton - a man classed as a historian - couldn't stick to facts because neither him nor Richard Edmonds bothered to show up to really know what happened. 

It is fact that certain countries like France consider that Holocaust Denial is a crime. In the United Kingdom, Holocaust Denial is not a crime and a three day trial did not set up a precedent of any kind in this regard.

It is fact that millions of Jews were harassed, persecuted, tortured and killed in a variety of ways. No amount of revisionism can change that. Playing with numbers doesn't change the horrendous nature of what happened.

To say that the Holocaust didn't happen is to say that Adolf Hitler never existed, that Mein Kampf was never written, that the speeches made about getting rid of Jews were never made, that the Geheime Staatspolizei, the Schutzstaffel, the Waffen SS and even end units of the Wehrmacht proper were not committed to the expulsion, imprisonment and eradication of Jews.

This is John Tyndall, high ranking official of the National Front and later founder of the BNP of whom Richard Edmonds was a great admirer. Most probably one of the reasons why so called members of National Action show themselves with the same flag. White supremacists, Jew haters. 

We are talking about National Socialists that refuse to accept one of the core principles of National Socialism. The Holocaust did happen. We can discuss about numbers, about places and about methods used but no amount of discussion can erase what actually happened.

All the talk about who is and who isn't a revisionist coming from the authors of Heritage and Destiny is absolute crap generated by personal animosity and hatred.

   




   











Thursday, 14 February 2019

Alison Chabloz: On Inquisition, learning and Social Change

Alison Chabloz: On Inquisition, learning and Social Change

If we to continue talking about what is offensive, grossly offensive and extremely offensive, Humanity would be stuck in the Stone Age for every time there has been a leap into the future we have to deal with those who feel offended by evolution.

As a Catholic, I reject the Catholic Church as a political, often repressive and hierarchical institution that in many respects has been guilty of the worst atrocities in human history. The Earth is not the centre of the Universe despite the fact that Galileo Galilei was arrested and forced to explain himself in front of an Inquisition. 

We would be living with the unnecessary threat of deadly illnesses and still believing that bleeding a human being is the way to get rid of the said illnesses if people had not gone out of the way and risked their lives to dissect human corpses to get to know about the human body and the bodily functions of the human body. 

We cannot know the full truth about conflicts happening in our time but there are those who issue laws and promote fear to prevent people from inquiring and researching to get a better picture of what really happened and what is really happening. For many years, the German Wehrmacht was blamed for the execution of Polish officers. It was easy to blame Germany for it because after all Germany had been defeated in war and the Soviet Union was the winning partner although the partnership soon came to an end with the beginning of the Cold War. The Polish soldiers had actually being executed by Soviet Soldiers following Stalin's orders, the same Stalin that decimated by the Soviet Army by executing practically all high ranking officers of the Soviet Army to the point that the Soviets faced catastrophic defeats both when fighting Finland and Japan.

There isn't one version of history. In fact, there is one version of every conflict for every individual involved or affected by it and not even the most capable historian would be physically capable of understanding and knowing the full extent of a single conflict, let alone the complexity of  what we know as World War Two. The number of those who perished is absolutely irrelevant and in any case nobody can honestly say that he or she knows exactly how many died, how the died and in some cases not even where they died because they just vanished in the widespread mess of war.

To accuse Alison Chabloz of being a Holocaust Denier is an insult. She doesn't deny that Jews and others were persecuted. She expressly stated in court and outside the courtroom that she never denied that persecution and killings happened. She questions the means and the numbers and there is a living human being who could state without a shadow of a doubt that he or she knows how, where and how many people lost their lives but, once again, Intolerance and Stupidity get on the way - sometimes in a very threatening and forceful manner on the way of those who want to get a better picture of what really happened.

If as Humanity we are stuck with myths and half-truths, we are going to be deprived of a fundamental freedom that it is the freedom to find the truth and the freedom to evolve. Socrates didn't go to his death for nothing. He chose to drank poison and die because he was dying for a fundamental principle. Socrates stated: Say something and I will prove that you are wrong. Say the opposite and I will prove that you are wrong. But some of those who say that they admire Socrates are the first ones to pass laws to prevent individuals from questioning official versions of events. Another great philosopher - Descartes - said "I think, therefore I exist". We exist because of the capacity to think and our thinking must not be dictated by intolerant idiots that want to force us to accept myths and mythology.













Thursday, 6 December 2018

Alison Chabloz: Details about herself and coming court appeal in London


Details about herself and coming court appeal in London.

By now, most people should be aware of how difficult - or even dangerous - it is to publicise alternative points of view not just in the United Kingdom but also across the world.

Mass Media distortions and vested interests are often getting in the way of the truth when it comes to knowing what those who don't share what are know as 'mainstream views' actually think or do. Do follow the link below the picture to get an update.



Alison Chabloz Online


Sunday, 27 May 2018

What do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson have in common?

What do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson have in common?

For more than 16 years, children were being raped in places like Rotherham and other British cities and so called mainstream political parties and Police were doing practically absolutely nothing to protect those being abused because they were afraid of being accused of racism.

Organisations that were supposed to protect vulnerable children looked the other way and rape gangs could do their dirty business unmolested. They were so confident than in some cases taxi services were used to transport children to places where gangs plied them with alcohol and drugs and gang raped them.

When a well-known Far Right leader spoke to the BBC, the BBC accused him of being racist for daring to raise the issue that is today widespread news and not long after the BBC itself was rocked by a scandal involving well-known entertainers that even used BBC facilities to carry out sexual activities with minors.

Now, what do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson have in common? All of them have spoken openly about Muslim rape gangs and against Muslim terrorism while British authorities have indicated that they are actively working to prevent Muslim terrorist attacks.

Police authorities and Anti-Terrorism organisations within the Security Services did not prevent what happened on July 7, 2005. They did not prevent either the beheading of a British soldier close to military headquarters in London. They knew the to-be culprits long before they perpetrated attacks that left more than 50 dead and many more injured. They even tried to recruit the killers of Lee Rigby.

What do Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson also have in common? They have been arrested, trialed and convicted. We have come to the point that more Police resources are being used against those who denounce crime. This is certainly a paradox when Police representatives have gone as far as asking parents to denounce their children and teachers to denounce pupils if there is any suspicion regarding their involvement in terrorist activities. Needless to say, it is a monstrosity to ask parents to denounce their own children and it is also a monstrosity to ask teachers to denounce their own pupils.

But this is just part of the picture. Even a joke, something done merely as a joke, without intent to cause damage and without hatred, can land anybody in serious trouble in a legal system in which courts are eager to prosecute and convict those accused to appease or gratify vested interests. When this happens, Justice goes out through the window and a Totalitarian State is born.

There are also attempts to censor people who use social media and threats have been made against social media providers. Power and control, repression, persecution, demonizing, prosecution and incarceration are now the rule rather than the exception in an environment that is increasingly unstable in a very fragmented British political and social reality.

In the meantime, the number of victims of stabbing and gun crime keeps rising. Whether it is about issues involving Jews, Muslims or people leaving on the fringes of society, the country is in a state of flux. Add to this the complications arising from political issues and geopolitical issues and you get an explosive mix. I haven't included factors related to an economic reality in which people find themselves in ever more difficult financial circumstances that lead to dysfunctional families and mental and physical health problems.

This is not a very optimistic description of what is happening in Britain but even less optimistic events will follow sooner than later that could put an end to the United Kingdom as we know it. The man that some say could be the next British Prime Minister favors what some call a 'United Ireland', knowing the implications of supporting such a move.

Therefore, wherever you look you can see impending crisis. If you criticize a Jew or a Muslim, somebody would be offended and you could end up in court and facing jail. But if you support murdering babies, the mass media will rejoice and you could become a celebrity. People in the Republic of Ireland voted in favour of the Babies Holocaust.

Tuesday, 3 April 2018

On Jewish Holocaust and other issues

On Jewish Holocaust and other issues

World War Two has been a subject of interest in my family for understandable reasons and had a profound impact on me from my early childhood. Today, more than 70 years after the end of World War Two both in terms of events that happened during World War Two and after World War Two, the subject appears to be as relevant or even more relevant that it was in the days of World War Two.

We are daily bombarded with references to World War Two and words pertaining to the ideologies very much linked to the conflict are very much part of today's political discourse. There are legal cases across Europe concerning World War Two and this includes Britain where there are legal cases in British courts and there is intense debate involving political parties regarding Jewish issues

A few days ago, in Poland, a law was passed banning references to Polish participation in the plight of the Jews, practically saying that no Poles were involved in the plight of the Jews when in fact history tells us that Poles, Ukrainians and peoples of many other nationalities including French, Italians and even The Vatican were involved in the plight of the jews. 

There is no denying that there was active and deliberate persecution of Jews in Europe but there are serious doubts about numbers and methodology and anybody who raises serious questions about the official version of events suddenly finds himself or herself under attack. Knowing history and accounts about history, many things cannot be written in stone and so called official versions are bound to be countered when new evidence arises showing that official accounts are not accurate or are in dire need of amendments. If it is valid when it comes to the Titanic or the fate of the Russian Imperial Family, it is valid when it comes to the persecution of Jews in Europe - no matter how many laws are passed to deny individuals the right to ask questions and to raise doubts about the veracity of many historical events.

I look at developments in Europe during World War Two and it becomes immediately apparent that there are serious cracks in official versions of events and especially when what is known as the Jewish Holocaust is said to have reached a climax when Germany was fighting in several fronts in Europe, in Africa and in the Middle East. Germany was fully committed in the battlefields. Whoever was not deployed in the battlefields had to be used in the home front to produce what was necessary to keep Germany alive and this was not just about what was necessary to continue the war effort. Manpower had been stretched to the limit. Because Germany didn't have enough manpower, slave workers were employed and foreign nationals did run so called concentration camps.
Fuel was in short supply. Much of the effort made by the Afrika Korps was done to secure oil sources to keep the Wehrmacht operational and after events in Africa and Middle East lack of basic supplies marked the beginning of the end because every bit of fuel available was desperately needed to prevent Soviet advances in the East and to prevent Allied advances both in the West in the South.

Logic tells us that being so over-stretched, the running of the camps would been even more severely affected. If there was little the local population could get with constant bombardment, there would have been even less resources available for concentration camps. If people outside concentration camps were facing extreme rationing, those in concentration camps would certainly be facing starvation and therefore most of the deaths in concentration camps would have been caused by starvation and diseases related to starvation. Those found still alive when then camps were taken were found suffering from extreme malnutrition and this reinforces the idea that malnutrition and lack of basic sanitary facilities were in fact the biggest killers.

When Germar Rudolf then working for the Max Planck Institute suggested that there were not enough chemicals to justify the official versions of events, he was fired and was also forced to forget about his PhD at the University of Stuttgart. As if this wasn't enough, a warrant of arrest was issued forcing him to flee to Spain, to England and ultimately to the USA from where he was extradited to face courts in Germany. Germany, a highly cultured country, prosecutes anybody who dares to challenge the official version of events even if the official version of events cannot be supported with factual information. Starvation, diseases related to starvation and ailments caused by poor sanitation seemed to be the most likely cause of death in concentration camps. Vast numbers of people living in very crowded conditions would have been prone to contract lethal infectious diseases very much as it happened during several plagues in the history of the European Continent. Burning corpses in ovens or pires or burying them in collective graves would have been the obvious way of disposing of the corpses of those who had succumbed to starvation or disease.

Was there persecution of Jews? Yes, there was persecution of Jews but camps were not only meant for Jews but also for peoples of other ethnic backgrounds including prisoners of war. Life in crowded conditions combined with malnutrition leading to starvation and illnesses was the most important cause of death. There were executions but not enough to justify the numbers that were registered as factual information when in fact they were the product of speculation. We will never know how many people died during World War Two including those who died from natural causes. If it is difficult to ascertain the number of casualties in today's conflicts, we can imagine that during World War Two it would have been even more difficult to determine accurate numbers.

People who have different views about what happened in those days should not be criminalised. Was there persecution? Yes, there was. Did people die in concentration camps? Yes, they did. How many died? We will never know. How many died from starvation and diseases? We don't know because there are no records. There are not enough records of executions and there are not enough records of any other cause of death. Numbers that have been presented as facts are the product of speculation.

It was a terrible time in history. Millions died that should not have died and this includes men, women and children. It was a tragedy but it was a tragedy for all those involved. Nobody should be allowed to use the said tragedy as a propaganda tool for spurious purposes - regardless of nationality, religion or any other classification criteria or background.

World War Two is not the historical patrimony of the Jews. It is estimated that more than 60 millions people across the globe lost their lives, peoples of all religions, peoples of all races, peoples of many nationalities.


Monday, 29 May 2017

Germar Rudolf: Persecuting those who seek the truth

Germar Rudolf: Persecuting those who seek the truth

Germar Rudolf, a qualified chemist linked to the Max Planck Institute in Germany, has been persecuted by the German government that went as far as requesting his extradition to send him to jail in Germany.

Germar Rudolf was born in Limburg an der Lahn, Hesse in 1964. As a young German, and like many other Germans, he was indoctrinated, brainwashing, and made to accept guilty for something they had nothing to do with because they were born long after the end of World War Two.

Germany is still under the grip of Political Correctness leading to persecution of anybody who dares to challenge any official views about what really happened during World War Two.

After initially suport the CSU/CDU, political coalition now led by Angela Merkel, he distanced himself from the CSU/CDU.

In 1990, after doing his military service in the Luftwaffe, he joined the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research at Stuttgart. In 1991, He started working on a paper entitled Report on the formation and verification of cyanide compounds in the Auschwitz "gas chambers" and he did so working on behalf of Hajo Herrmann, a former Luftwaffe pilot.

After the report was publicised by the media, he was banned from entering the Max Planck Institute ever again and political persecution started. He was told by the University of Stuttgart that to withdraw his application for a final PhD examination and threatened being told that should he maintain his application his application would be rejected.

German Rudolf's reports indicate that only minute amounts of cyanide compounds were found in samples taken from Auschwitz.

Legal consequences followed. Instead of being treated as a scientist, German authorities treated him as a criminal, merely because he presented evidence that questioned the revealed official truth.

In 1995, Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months in prison accused of inciting racial hatred - trumped charges against a man whose sole crime was to use facts to challenge official myths. The District Court of Stuttgart sentenced him to 14 months in prison using what is called the Rudolf Report. In Germany, questioning the official version of the so called Holocaust is classified as a crime.

Germar Rudolf was forced to flee to Spain, to England and finally arrived in the United States where after many years of appeals in 2005 he was deported back to Germany. On March 15, 2007, the Manheim District Court sentenced him to two years and six months in prison accusing him of inciting hated disparaging the dead and libel. Copies of his "Lectures on the Holocaust" were confiscated and destroyed. He was released from prison on July 5 and now lives in the USA with his wife and his daughter.

A list of selected publications of Germar Rudolf include:

Auschwitz-Lies: Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the Holocaust, with Carlo Mattogno (Theses & Dissertations Press, 2005), ISBN 1591480213

Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory (Theses & Dissertations Press, 3rd edition, 2003), ISBN 0967985625

The Rudolf Report: Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the Gas Chambers of Auschwitz (Theses & Dissertations Press, 3rd edition, 2003), ISBN 096798565X

German governments, one after another, have become what they say that they reject. There is Systematic Political Persecution against anybody who dares to investigate to find out what really happened under Das Dritte Reich. Those who dare to challenge the official version of events is criminalised and anybody who dares to publish facts about what actually happened is sent to jail.

Karl Hohenstauffen

Sunday, 11 December 2016

Sir Phillip Green, the British Madoff, is still Sir Phillip Green

11, 000 people lost their jobs, more than 25,000 people had their pension funds raided, he buys a new luxury ship and keep his title of Sir awarded to him 'for services to British industries'.

Sir Phillip Green is the archetype of those who created the levels of animosity that led to the so called Holocaust: a white collar speculator that destroys thousands of lives and gets away with it because the Justice System is not fit for purpose.

When the mass media and the political establishment talk about anti-Judaism, they should mention the Madoffs and the Greens of this world that with their actions damage the reputation of entire communities and give rise to stereotypes that lead to violence.

Wednesday, 21 October 2015

Single-handedly, Benjamin Netanyahu will cause more damage than Adolf Hitler

Benjamin Netahyahu will single-handedly cause more damage to Jewish Communities across the world than Adolf Hitler could ever cause.

The Israeli Prime Minister has become the embodiment of all the evil National Socialist Germany propaganda was spreading and that made the so called Holocaust possible.

Today, you don't need Joseph Goebbels. The Prime Minister of Israel Bejanmin Netanyahu is himself doing the job of Joseph Goebbels, defining himself as a warmonger by both his words and his actions, promoting hatred against Jews as the head of a racist theocratic state that is breaking every rule in the book.

All the good work towards understanding and peace that both Yitzhak Rabin and Ariel Sharon did in their latter days has been destroyed and now all occupied territories are a battlefield and what happens in Palestine is portraying Jews as mass murderers and innocents are paying a very high price.

Under Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel has become the evil that those fleeing persecution in Europe were running away from in the 1930s and 1940s.