Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

Introduction:

In the midst of an international crisis generated by the spread of Corona Virus, other battles are being fought. The apparent disappearance of the British National Party from the political arena under what Adam Walker and Clive Jefferson - present Leader and Deputy Leader - defined as "new leadership style", the BNP became a ghost in British politics. This led to the formation of groups like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters. Her attempt to fill up the void has been shown as no more than sheer opportunism using part of the political agenda of the British National Party and mixing it with contents that never had anything to do with British Nationalism.

More than once, Anne Maria Waters has found herself "in choppy seas", trying and failing to define a coherent agenda. On the one hand, she talks about keeping Britain British. On the other, she has a liberal agenda that goes very much against keeping Britain British. On the one hand, she states that she rejects the ways of the British National Party and of traditional British Nationalism and on the other hand she is surrounded by elements of the BNP that constitute the core of For Britain.

For a while, she had the support of British Nationalists, despite the fact that many of her stances go directly against fundamental values of British Nationalism. Having said that, the publication of a video launching a frontal attack against British Nationalists and using the usual tools used by others to misrepresent British Nationalism, she appears to have shot herself in the foot. Some comentators have indicated that the hatred she has expressed against Islam has more to do with her own sexual preferences than with a genuine attempt to keep Britain British. For Britain seems to be a one man band or, to put it more appropriately, a one woman band.

Essay:

"Nationalists up and down the country were struck with astonishment following publication, Friday April 10th, of a YouTube video by For Britain leader, Anne Marie Waters, attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative.

Questions are now being asked as to who - or what - could have triggered Ms Waters into humiliating herself and her party in a move that further deepens the divide between civic and ethno-nationalists.

To answer the question, we perhaps need to look at events dating back twelve months or so, when certain prominent figures within the Tommy Robinson and For Britain movements widened their reading lists to include works on the Frankfurt School and Holocaust Revisionism. One such notable figure, Shazia Hobbs, was a regular contributor to TR News - a website dedicated to Tommy Robinson, apparently run by staunch Tommy advocate and self-confessed "Nazi Jew", Avi Yemeni, currently residing in Australia. As Shazia's interest and knowledge increased, she published a feature on TR News entitled  "Hypocrisy". As most people know, the Tommy Robinson movement has no problem with any criticism of Islam; less so when the criticism is directed at Judaism. Without explanation, Shazia's article was quietly removed from the website by TR News editors.

Shortly after, Tommy again found himself behind bars. In a disastrous PR move, marking the beginning of the end for the Tommy movement, TR News published a video entitled "How to Burn a Nazi". The video was a brutal, unwarranted attack on Patriotic Alternative leader, Mark Collett, Shazia Hobbs and another former prominent Team Tommy activist, Dionne Møller aka Secret Sources. It's necessary to remind readers here that the video was published using the name of Tommy Robinson whilst Tommy himself was in prison. From then on, support for Tommy Robinson began to fade, which is hardly surprising. Tommy was seen to have stabbed some of his brightest and best elements in the back: elements who are true British patriots, born and bred in this country, unlike Avi of Oz and Brian of Tel Aviv.

At the same time, over the past few months, interest in ethno-nationalism and, in particular, Patriotic Alternative (PA) has increased, notably by way of contributions from a new wave of younger, talented content creators, who understand the plight facing future generations and who are motivated enough to seek and campaign for reasonable solutions. Citing the infamous 14 words, these youngsters, mainly inspired by Mark Collett, PA deputy leader Laura Towler and other prominent figures within PA circles, propose feasible strategies with which to tackle public opinion on the demographic crisis facing the British Isles and the west in general. Making the most out of the COVID19 Lockdown, for example, an army of online Groypers have been brigading suitable political targets. (Check out Natty's calls to LBC's Nick Ferrari and UNWAShED's livestreams on YouTube). Last month, the second ever Patriotic Alternative conference was held just outside London. The event was a huge success, attended by 200 smartly-dressed patriots from all walks of life and of all ages, with the youngest just 15 years of age.

Now, fast forward to Ms Waters' uncanny decision to put out a less vicious but nonetheless similar video to "How to burn a Nazi", attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative. As noted in the recent article on this blog, Ms Waters' and Tommy were - and possibly still are – quite close associates. Both follow the counter-jihad line, shrivelling in horror and squealing like leftists at the slightest mention of one particular ethnic community or of certain aspects of WW2 historiography.

The strategy used by Anne Marie Waters in her video - namely, to defame and smear her political rivals as "racists" who wish to "round up black people" – has backfired spectacularly, as seen by the swift removal of her video shortly after it had been shared on the TR News Telegram channel :
Presumably, someone ordered Avi Yemeni to take the video down. The YouTube original - where comments were originally disabled and then reactivated following complaints - has received a battering, both in the comments section and in the thumbs-up thumbs-down ratio. At the time of writing, there are just 800 likes to 1.6k dislikes.

So, why did Ms Waters choose to shoot herself and her own party in the foot? Was she badly advised by someone in her entourage? At the beginning of the video, filmed Friday morning, she mentions being flooded with messages about Patriotic Alternative and Mark Collett...

Certain sources appear to believe that Ms Waters was shown a photograph posted the previous evening on Facebook, showing Shazia Hobbs together with persecuted singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz in attendance at the recent PA conference.

No doubt that there are spies on Alison Chabloz’s Facebook page who sometimes send information to Hope Not Hate (HNH). Definite proof of this was seen last year when HNH Head of Intel, Matthew Collins, fished several of Alison's "friends only" posts from her timeline and then posted them on Twitter. The social media platform forced Collins to delete. But that is beside the point.

At the same time Ms Waters' published her video, the banner on her YouTube channel was changed. The banner now features a photograph of Ms Waters, also in the company of Shazia, taken at a 2016 demo.










Ms Waters' move provoked this reaction from Shazia:

To complicate matters further, Matthew Collins and the rest of the Hope Not Hate cabal aren't the only ones champing at the bit to have Alison Chabloz once again clamped in irons - for singing songs. Unlike Ms Waters and many other civic and ethno-nationalists, Alison has never been associated with the Tommy Robinson movement. On the contrary, her legal troubles are the direct result of Alison being targeted by people within Team Tommy, and in particular via the dirty deeds of Ambrosine Shitrit from London.

Mrs Shitrit is known to have financially supported Tommy fans, paying travel costs and hotels to ensure large crowds at pro-Tommy demos and court hearings. Indeed, the day Alison Chabloz was convicted, all the news headlines were grabbed... you've guessed it! - by Tommy Robinson getting himself arrested outside Leeds Crown Court. And that's not all: whilst Tommy was stealing media attention up in Leeds, a posse of his close associates, including Jonathan Hoffman and Sharon Klaff, rolled up outside Alison's court case, waving Israeli flags, cheering her conviction and displaying aggressive behaviour towards her supporters.

Who persuaded Tommy that it was a wise idea to go to Leeds that day, in possible breach of a court order..? - A move that did eventually see Tommy back in jail.

Admittedly, there is no evidence of Mrs Shitrit or Hope Note Hate sending the photo of Shazia and Alison at the Patriotic Alternative conference to Ms Waters. There is, however, a third possibility.

Readers will perhaps remember an ongoing Battle of Wills between Alison Chabloz and ex-model, Michele Renouf, which culminated in a series of defamatory articles about Alison, penned by two of Mrs Renouf's closest allies, Richard Edmonds and Peter Rushton. Four articles in total were published, labelling Alison as "a traitor and a saboteur", demanding her "surgical removal from movement circles" and even holding her responsible for the death of Professor Robert Faurisson (who was 89 years old at the time).

Last May, Rushton threatened to sue Alison Chabloz in a remarkable move that ensured he would no longer be able to mention her name without being immediately ridiculed.

Since then, others have carried the torch on behalf of Mrs Renouf, attempting to characterise Alison as a “leftist lover of Islam” whenever the opportunity arises. The schema, like the sockpuppetry, is predictable, as seen in this series of comments published by the same people under two videos, published six months' apart:

Note the comment above by "Jack Doe" (one of the pseudos used by ex-BNP electoral candidate, Julie Lake from Bristol) that Alison Chabloz would be "out of the loop"... It must have come as a nasty shock to learn that Alison Chabloz was welcomed by Mark and Laura into the Patriotic Alternative movement. The news also appears to have left Hope Not Hate speechless, for once. Furthermore, Alison's presence at the Patriotic Alternative conference and her work with the Patriotic Groypers must be absolutely devastating, both for Ambrosine Shitrit and for Michele Renouf.

These people will stop at nothing. Ambrosine Shitrit continues to lie and smear on social media and, worse still, the Rushton-Renouf camp appears to be spreading further damaging rumours that Mark Collett would be responsible for having caused a massive split in the movement. A sure sign of desperation and, of course, highly ironic, coming from those who are in fact responsible for having engineered the split in the first place. They didn't attend the PA conference, and they were not missed in the slightest.

This latest split in the movement is probably the best thing to have happened in British nationalist politics for over a decade. The chaff have sorted themselves out from the wheat, into their own little ghetto,  now further removed from the main stage of British nationalism than even the Team Tommy civ-nats.

We will probably never know who was responsible for tipping Anne Marie Waters over the edge and undermining any slim chance she has left of gaining authority and credibility. Natural justice has been served. Here and now, we as nationalists must focus on the essential and spread the 14 words: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

Source: Nationalist Forum

Alison Chabloz counters vicious attacks launched by Peter Rushton

Alison Chabloz counters vicious attacks launched by Peter Rushton

In response to my emotionally-challenged in-house critics and their demands for my SURGICAL REMOVAL from movement circles

“Look at your own lives, everyone of you: imagine that suddenly you have people against you saying 'you are a liar' or whatever ... and they are unable to find anything wrong in your life.”

~ Robert Faurisson, Shepperton, October 20^th 2018.

Thanks to TEAM RIVAROL for kindly inviting me to respond to the article signed Peter RUSHTON, translated on p. 2 of RIVAROL n° 3365, Le révisionnisme pourrait devenir un délit en GrandeBretagne : Vincent Reynouard est en grand danger! [lit. Revisionism risks being criminalised in

Britain: Vincent Reynouard is in grave danger!]. My gratitude in particular goes to RIVAROL editor Mr. Jérôme Bourbon for having redacted Rushton's ad hominem and personal abuse present in the original English publication.

Indeed, the English version of Rushton's most recent commentary [Chabloz succeeds in criminalising

'Holocaust denial'] is the latest in an aggravating series of four defamatory articles published by

Heritage & Destiny [H&D], beginning November 26^th 2018 with an astonishing statement¹ , signed by

Rushton, Michele Renouf, Richard Edmonds and “approved” by Guillaume Nichols, Joe Fallisi and Fred Leuchter, accusing me of being a “traitor and a saboteur”. Without a shred of evidence, the abovenamed persons accuse me, in public, of having informed Left wing “charity” Hope Not Hate of the October 20^th conference in Shepperton near London and, indirectly, for being ultimately responsible for the death of Professor Robert Faurisson the following day.

In contrast to RIVAROL offering a right to reply, the media strategy of Mr. Rushton and H&D as far as I am concerned has been to carry on smearing regardless.

Three further H&D articles - as well as French and English versions of a YouTube video uploaded by Vincent Reynouard following my recent re-trial at Southwark Crown Court – strongly suggest that my detractors not only wish to see me isolated from revisionist-nationalist ranks here in Britain, but that they are attempting to sever links I worked hard to foster with French and international revisionistnationalist colleagues. Astonishingly, in both the recent English H&D article and Reynouard's video, Rushton insists that I have never been part of the revisionist-movement and that my supporters would be wise to immediately withdraw their support, including their financial donations.

More worryingly still, Rushton's defamatory publications have now led to threats of violence against my person. First posted on the UK Vanguard News Network nationalist forum, these comments state that there is now apparently a £10,000 bounty on my head, along with a threat of acid being thrown in my face if I dare to attend any future nationalist-revisionist events. (These violent threats were originally drawn to my attention when they were copied and pasted to the comments section of Reynouard's recent YouTube video of his “interview” with Rushton).

Several forwarded emails originally penned by Rushton provide further clear evidence of this deliberate and ongoing smear campaign. A campaign of defamation not only against me personally, but perhaps also intended to destabilise and undermine the revisionist cause itself.

On November 26 and December 2 2018, Peter Rushton sent two emails to an English compatriot. In the first, he states, adding his own emphasis:

“Chabloz had to be denounced and had to be surgically removed from Movement circles... I know Chabloz lied about the 'Agence Bocage' article for which she blamed Michele Renouf at the start of the whole business and I know why she lied. I spoke face to face with the actual publisher of that piece last week.”

Vincent Reynouard confirms that a conversation between him and Rushton did indeed take place after the Shepperton event. However, contrary to Rushton's and others' claims, Reynouard strongly denies any involvement with the Agence Bocage article published just after my original trial began in January

2018 ². I stand by my original claim that the Agence Bocage hatchet job was instigated by Michele Renouf under the influence of her strategic thinker, Peter Rushton. Indeed, both the original and translated versions of Rushton's latest article echo the opinions expressed by the “anonymous” author of the Agence Bocage piece. Likewise, the mysterious author's fears over Reynouard's eventual extradition and imprisonment are reinterated in one H&D defamatory piece authored by veteran Nationalist Richard Edmonds ³. January 2018, following publication by Agence Bocage, Edmonds circulated the article via email (but not to me), gossiping that I had been “bocaged” and that Reynouard and I had fallen out “big time” - at the time, news to me.  In short, if Vincent Reynouard did not publish this article, then perhaps the real author/editor now needs to step forward.

In his second email of December 2nd, Rushton continues:

“Our investigation of what went wrong at Shepperton is not part of a political party or a student debating society: as such I do not respond to demands for 'proof', especially not Ms Chabloz's demands - I carry out an investigation only as I see fit. Since this was my event that was disgracefully betrayed, and especially considering Prof. Faurisson 's death weekend, I will be able to provide judge, jury and executioner.”

Thus, from judge, jury and executioner, to today's price tag of £10,000 on my head and the threat of an acid attack – result of an investigation carried out as seen fit by Mr. Rushton. Judging by Mr. Rushton's chequered past within British nationalism – including being banned from the British National Party in 2002 ⁴ – one cannot help but note the similarity of Rushton's investigatory approach with that of the East German Communist tribunal in John Le Carré's Cold War espionage novel, The Spy Who Came In From The Cold. Rushton's wording is an almost exact repetition of the Communist Party judge: evidence against double agent Hans-Dieter Mundt will be heard as the tribunal sees fit ⁵. As shown by the persecution and prosecution of revisionists, Soviet style investigation tactics are still very much in operation throughout the “free” west  and especially in Europe. However, deployment of such manifestly disloyal methods within the truth-seeking revisionist-nationalist community itself can only be described as exceedingly worrying, if not downright sinister.

As for last month's ruling, it seems that, according to the venomous Mr. Rushton and his handful of emotionally-challenged allies, it is wiser to simply shut up and do as we're told by the opposition rather than stand in the arena and fight back. Why no condemnation from Rushton & Co of the enemies of the free speech? Why no support for artistic expression? Why no demands for open and honest debate on matters “Holocaust”? Does Rushton's approach include similar condemnation of Dieudonné vs France, ECHR N° 25239/13 – cited during my trial by the prosecutor and in the court's ruling?

Since proceedings began, Rushton and Renouf have done everything in their power to undermine and discredit my contribution to the cause: censorship of my songs in Vichy 2017 at Robert Faurisson's 88^th birthday celebration; approval of Agence Bocage's 2018 hatchet job; childishly grotesque demands that I am to be excluded from nationalist-revisionist conferences; accusations without proof of betrayal and sabotage; lies and ritual defamation including holding me responsible for the death of Robert Faurisson; all indicating a course of action intended to bring about – in Rushton's most ungracious terms –  my “surgical removal from movement circles”. Little wonder that the highly respected late German nationalist, Manfred Roeder, described those who indulge in such dishonourable behaviour as “rogues and cutthroats” ⁶.

This “legal precedent” (true only in the most marginal sense) of which Rushton, Renouf and Reynouard complain - well, from my point of view, it is Rushton and Renouf themselves who are in part responsible because there was no need for my case to go to court in the first place. Uploaded to YouTube whilst I was in Switzerland, the video of my song (((Survivors))) was outside the jurisdiction of England and Wales. As Rushton admits in RIVAROL and H&D, he “personally felt my trial was winnable” - to the extent that he then even proposed himself as “expert” defence witness as part of my legal team. 

Ultimately, is Peter Rushton to be congratulated? There are many who believe that my trial has brought the revisionist cause well and truly under the spotlight here in Britain. With regard to the sensationalist and absurd statement that I would be responsible for the criminalization of 'Holocaust denial', perhaps after examining his own role in this case, Rushton would do well to spit his venom at my accusers and their puppets, rather than simply parroting their rhetoric whilst seeking to undermine one of his compatriots.

My case will now continue in the Divisional Court to challenge the legal points of "sending" = downloading / sharing links on a "public" electronic network.

Finally, I cannot conclude without expressing my deepest gratitude to my solicitor Kevin LowryMullins and my barrister Adrian Davies for remaining loyal and steadfast over the past two years.

Bravo and thank you to those who truly support all revisionists, the revisionist cause and the right to freedom of expression.

Alison Chabloz, February 28^th 2018.

alisonchabloz.com

^1.  The sabotage of Prof. Robert Faurisson’s Shepperton meeting: informants exposed; Heritage and Destiny, Preston, UK; 2018.

^2.  Affaire Chabloz: stragtégie problématique et danger réel; Agence Bocage, Green Lanes, London, 2018.

^3.  Does Alison Chabloz know what she’s doing? Or criminalising “Holocaust”-revisionism by the back door; Heritage and Destiny, Preston, UK; 2019.

^4.  Considerations For Proscription – A BNP Booklet; British National Party, 2002.

⁵.The Spy Who Came In From The Cold, p. 180; John Le Carré, Hodder and Stoughton Ltd., London, 1963.

^6. Deutsche Bürgerinitiative newsletter n° 11/12, p. 3; Schwarzenborn, Germany, 2013.

Peter Rushton: Badly misinformed about the character of English Law

Peter Rushton: Badly misinformed about the character of English Law

Once again, Peter Rushton has been found wanting on the pages of Heritage and Destiny. Under the title "Chabloz succeeds in criminalizing Holocaust denial", Peter Rushton blatantly shows that he knows very little about English Law in this regard.

As a matter of fact, Holocaust denial is not a crime in English Law and therefore nothing of what happened last week at Southwark Crown Court changes such fundamental fact.

If Mr Rushton had bothered to show up during the three days of the deliberations at Southwark Crown Court he would have been able to produce a better report of what happened at Southwark Crown Court.

Mr Rushton then writes about the ill informed views of Richard Edmonds about the trial.

That’s because the earlier court judgment could not set a precedent: it applied only to Ms Chabloz’s particular case. Richard Edmonds warned in an article for the Heritage & Destiny website published on January 2nd – ‘Does Alison Chabloz know what she’s doing? Or criminalising “Holocaust”-revisionism by the back door’. Mr Edmonds’ warning has been fully vindicated this week.

He wrote:
“This is not the case with the findings of a Crown Court. It is not impossible that should in February Ms. Chabloz lose her appeal at Southwark Crown Court, then her case, involving as it does elements of the so-called ‘Holocaust’, could be used as a legal precedent to launch criminal prosecutions against Historical revisionists by the back-door, so to speak, in the absence of any formal laws in Britain banning ‘Holocaust’-denial.”

Once again, Richard Edmonds himself shows lack of acumen regarding the legal process and makes assumptions that are not based on fact. Richard Edmonds is writing about something he didn't witness and knows very little about.

Unfortunately, Peter Rushton - a man classed as a historian - couldn't stick to facts because neither him nor Richard Edmonds bothered to show up to really know what happened. 

It is fact that certain countries like France consider that Holocaust Denial is a crime. In the United Kingdom, Holocaust Denial is not a crime and a three day trial did not set up a precedent of any kind in this regard.

It is fact that millions of Jews were harassed, persecuted, tortured and killed in a variety of ways. No amount of revisionism can change that. Playing with numbers doesn't change the horrendous nature of what happened.

To say that the Holocaust didn't happen is to say that Adolf Hitler never existed, that Mein Kampf was never written, that the speeches made about getting rid of Jews were never made, that the Geheime Staatspolizei, the Schutzstaffel, the Waffen SS and even end units of the Wehrmacht proper were not committed to the expulsion, imprisonment and eradication of Jews.

This is John Tyndall, high ranking official of the National Front and later founder of the BNP of whom Richard Edmonds was a great admirer. Most probably one of the reasons why so called members of National Action show themselves with the same flag. White supremacists, Jew haters. 

We are talking about National Socialists that refuse to accept one of the core principles of National Socialism. The Holocaust did happen. We can discuss about numbers, about places and about methods used but no amount of discussion can erase what actually happened.

All the talk about who is and who isn't a revisionist coming from the authors of Heritage and Destiny is absolute crap generated by personal animosity and hatred.

   

   

Alison Chabloz: On Inquisition, learning and Social Change

Alison Chabloz: On Inquisition, learning and Social Change

If we to continue talking about what is offensive, grossly offensive and extremely offensive, Humanity would be stuck in the Stone Age for every time there has been a leap into the future we have to deal with those who feel offended by evolution.

As a Catholic, I reject the Catholic Church as a political, often repressive and hierarchical institution that in many respects has been guilty of the worst atrocities in human history. The Earth is not the centre of the Universe despite the fact that Galileo Galilei was arrested and forced to explain himself in front of an Inquisition. 

We would be living with the unnecessary threat of deadly illnesses and still believing that bleeding a human being is the way to get rid of the said illnesses if people had not gone out of the way and risked their lives to dissect human corpses to get to know about the human body and the bodily functions of the human body. 

We cannot know the full truth about conflicts happening in our time but there are those who issue laws and promote fear to prevent people from inquiring and researching to get a better picture of what really happened and what is really happening. For many years, the German Wehrmacht was blamed for the execution of Polish officers. It was easy to blame Germany for it because after all Germany had been defeated in war and the Soviet Union was the winning partner although the partnership soon came to an end with the beginning of the Cold War. The Polish soldiers had actually being executed by Soviet Soldiers following Stalin's orders, the same Stalin that decimated by the Soviet Army by executing practically all high ranking officers of the Soviet Army to the point that the Soviets faced catastrophic defeats both when fighting Finland and Japan.

There isn't one version of history. In fact, there is one version of every conflict for every individual involved or affected by it and not even the most capable historian would be physically capable of understanding and knowing the full extent of a single conflict, let alone the complexity of  what we know as World War Two. The number of those who perished is absolutely irrelevant and in any case nobody can honestly say that he or she knows exactly how many died, how the died and in some cases not even where they died because they just vanished in the widespread mess of war.

To accuse Alison Chabloz of being a Holocaust Denier is an insult. She doesn't deny that Jews and others were persecuted. She expressly stated in court and outside the courtroom that she never denied that persecution and killings happened. She questions the means and the numbers and there is a living human being who could state without a shadow of a doubt that he or she knows how, where and how many people lost their lives but, once again, Intolerance and Stupidity get on the way - sometimes in a very threatening and forceful manner on the way of those who want to get a better picture of what really happened.

If as Humanity we are stuck with myths and half-truths, we are going to be deprived of a fundamental freedom that it is the freedom to find the truth and the freedom to evolve. Socrates didn't go to his death for nothing. He chose to drank poison and die because he was dying for a fundamental principle. Socrates stated: Say something and I will prove that you are wrong. Say the opposite and I will prove that you are wrong. But some of those who say that they admire Socrates are the first ones to pass laws to prevent individuals from questioning official versions of events. Another great philosopher - Descartes - said "I think, therefore I exist". We exist because of the capacity to think and our thinking must not be dictated by intolerant idiots that want to force us to accept myths and mythology.

Alison Chabloz: Press Release December 8th 2018

Press Release December 8th 2018

Alison Chabloz Appeal due to start next week adjourned

For reasons yet unknown, the Appeal in the Alison Chabloz case due to start on Monday at Southwark Crown Court in London has been adjourned. At best, an outrageous example of listing malpractice on the part of the listing clerk and, at worst, a breach of Criminal Procedure Rules. What this now implies for the continuation of Chabloz' Suspended Sentence also remains uncertain. 

Chabloz was convicted last May under the notorious S. 127 of the Communications Act 2003 for sending and for causing to be sent “grossly offensive” messages consisting of three songs uploaded to the Internet. Militant pro-Israel group Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) had originally initiated a private prosecution after police and the CPS failed to take action against Chabloz.

Chabloz' songs break the taboo of matters 'Holocaust'. Herself a victim of harassment by persons closely associated with CAA including one of its directors, Chabloz explained during cross-examination that her songs were composed in reaction to this targeting of her professional and social life, in particular after police and authorities had dismissed Chabloz' own complaints. Chabloz' interest in Holocaust revisionism came about as a result of her support for the pro-Palestinian cause and condemnation of Israel. Last month on Remembrance Day, Chabloz laid a wreath at the Cenotaph in Whitehall in honour of the 784 members of the British Armed Forces who lost their lives during the Palestine Campaign 1945-1948.

Against all odds and despite constant unwarranted attacks, Alison Chabloz is recognised and appreciated beyond Britain. A professionally-trained musician, she was recently nominated to the role of Cultural and Artistic Liaison for the UK & Europe on behalf of the American Freedom Party. 

The Appeal will be re-listed on Monday for dates some time in the New Year. 

“Thanks to their creations, artists enable the layman to see things that would appear intolerable under the plain, naked light of day. The Artist tells us things about the world that can only be told by way of Art. That is why artistic freedom is sacred and without artistic freedom we are unable to find meaning in our own history and indeed in our own lives. Art is part of our western tradition and it's exceedingly worrying that artists are being prosecuted and convicted for their work.” ~ Damien Viguier, barrister.

Alison Chabloz: Details about herself and coming court appeal in London

Details about herself and coming court appeal in London.

By now, most people should be aware of how difficult - or even dangerous - it is to publicise alternative points of view not just in the United Kingdom but also across the world.

Mass Media distortions and vested interests are often getting in the way of the truth when it comes to knowing what those who don't share what are know as 'mainstream views' actually think or do. Do follow the link below the picture to get an update.

Alison Chabloz Online

LRPO: Message sent by Alison Chabloz

London Regional Press Office receives message sent by Alison Chabloz

Dear Friends, 

Thank you to all who replied to my last email which included my latest parody "Lying Thieves". Apologies for not responding individually and for yet another impersonal mass email: busy times ahead! Please do let me know if you didn't receive the song and I will send you a copy. 

Upcoming court dates for my Appeal against conviction and sentencing are scheduled for December 10, 11 and 12 at Southwark Crown Court in central London. My solicitor informs it is quite possible that the court may have other urgent business and may therefore have to postpone. 

In other news, I was honoured to lay a wreath at the Cenotaph in London last Sunday November 11 in remembrance of the 784 members of the British Armed Forces who lost their lives during the peacekeeping mission to Palestine 1945-1948. Below you will find the link to some photos and a short video of the speeches given by Richard Edmonds, Tony Martin, Jordan Pont and myself at the rally afterwards. Many thanks to National Front Chairman and Deputy Chairman for organising the traditional Remembrance Day parade and allowing me to participate.

Finally, alongside preparations for my Appeal, I have been submitting several Subject Access Requests (SAR) to various organisations all involved to some extent in the conspiracy to have me prosecuted (visibly not for the "sending" of my songs over the Internet, but rather for the messages contained within the songs themselves). Companies and organisations must comply within 30 days according to the new GDPR rules. One organisation showing particular reticence is The Jewish Chronicle.

My SAR to the JC was submitted following an online article which associates the Pittsburgh Synagogue shooting with "UK far right extremists" on Gab, one of the social media platforms used by the shooter and which the enemies of free speech wish to see closed down. As well as citing my name, the JC article goes further in claiming that I would use Gab to "urge supporters" to donate via PayPal to a "legal fund".

As we have seen so many times in the past, this is one of the tried and tested techniques used by those wishing to stifle free and open debate. It's how they do it: demonise the messenger - not the message. Indeed, the article reminds me of several similar pieces published last year by the Canadian press, during my tour there organised by Paul Fromm, which associated my visit with the spate of bomb threats to US and Canadian Synagogues and Jewish community centres. As we know, it turned out that these bomb threats were the work of a "mentally unstable" Israeli Jew... 

In short, the JC's unfounded allegation inevitably led to my PayPal account being shut down last Tuesday, without explanation and without recourse to appeal. In addition to my SAR, I have submitted a complaint about the JC article to the Independent Press Standards Organisation. A couple of recent posts published on my website give details of successful SARs so far (link below). On the advice of a friend, I have set up an alternative to PayPal which can be found on my website. 

Again, thanks to all for your support and messages of good will. I will keep you informed concerning my Appeal and hope to see a good turnout at Southwark Crown Court on the day. 

Musical wishes,

Alison Chabloz.

Britain: A lot more to worry about

Britain: a lot more to worry about

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/couple-ban-neighbours-look-home-east-sussex-dispute-council-cpn-order-a8423256.html

Britain is now cuckooland. The amount of irrational legislation going through Parliament is absolutely beyond belief and the fact that Police Forces are being used to enforce such levels of irrationality is beyond the pale.

While real crime is on the rise with dramatic consequences in terms of loss of life, Police Forces are being used as toilet paper to implement ridiculous pieces of legislation and engage in political persecution.

The usual talk about lack of Police officers is an absolute lie. There are more than enough Police officers. The point is not about the lack of Police officers but about the way Police officers are being used.

Police officers recording a demonstration for Brexit. They are standing with cameras on a balcony at one of the headquarters of the BBC in Millbank, Central London. This is usual procedure. Practically, every single public event is recorded and later on recordings can be used and are used as evidence in courts of law.

Jeremy Bedford Turner, an activist that criticised Jewish Power in the United Kingdom, was taken to court and jailed for daring to criticise Jewish Power by people who said that 'they were offended by what he said'. The truth of what he said wasn't actually challenged. The whole issue was about 'being offended by what he said'. A similar case involved Alison Chabloz, a musician that composed songs that challenged the veracity of what is being said by Jewish lobbies and repeated by Establishment and mass media about what really happened during World War Two. Once again, the charges were about 'offensive comments'. The veracity of what she said was never challenged because in actual fact there is not enough evidence to support what has become a myth. All we have about real numbers of those affected by World War Two is estimates, numbers that could never be proven with irrefutable evidence.

Crime is rising and most importantly serious crime is rising and lives are being lost, but Police resources are being diverted and used in harassment and political persecution. 

National Action: British authorities and the mass media are trying to invent chocolate all over again

National Action: British authorities and the mass media are trying to invent chocolate all over again.

A headline published by The Independent on 8 September 2017 very much reflects the way of thinking of the British Establishment. They believe that banning a political organisation the said organisation will no longer exist. This is cuckooland thinking. You can ban and ban and ban and the organisation will continue to exist simply because it doesn't need to operate within a democratic framework.
A political movement (Politische Bewegung) doesn't have the constraints of a political party that needs to stay within the limits of the Electoral System. For many years, the British Establishment has been attempting to ban or derail Nationalist Political Parties like National Front, the British National Party, UKIP and others. The end result has been that unable to express their ideas within a democratic framework thousands of former political activists are now joining para-political organisations like National Action and others by the thousands either as members or sympathisers. These are the political realities that so called mainstream political parties have created and continue to promote.

Extremism can only be fought against in the ballot box. Using legislation introduced by now former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith designed to combat Islamic Terrorism to persecute individuals for political purposes will backfire in a big way. People are being sent to jail and kept in jail before they are even proven guilty of any alleged crimes. Habeas Corpus? Non existing. Detention without trial is the new reality and the whole burden of proof has been turned upside down. Before, everybody was innocent until proven guilty. Now, everybody is guilty before proven innocent. This is a mockery of the legal process and will completely destabilise British Society that is now run by the mobs. Even a Presidential visit of a duly elected US President was cancelled because of the pressure exerted by mobs and Universities are no longer centres for education but centres for political persecution and political discrimination. People are being kept in jail merely because they have been accused and we dare to criticise North Korea.

The Independent says that 'National Action is evading authorities by taking on new names - allegedly including Scottish Dawn and NS131 - in a technique used prolifically by Anjem Choudary's Islamist Network'. Is this news? For goodness sake, the said technique is as old as the world and the authorities should have foreseen that as soon as one name gets banned another name will pop up. The newspaper reports that a former detective said Police are left powerless to arrest neo-Nazis under new names. It takes weeks or months to take a case to Court and by the time the case is dealt in court names would have changed a few times. They are chasing smoke clouds driven by Political Correctness that is leading to violations of fundamental Human Rights.

A woman stands in court accused of composing, singing and posting on Internet a song that is according to the accusing party 'detrimental and deeply offensive to Jews'. They forget to mention that in the song Alison Chabloz deeply criticizes Jewish violations of Human Rights in Palestine. Keeping Palestinians in deplorable conditions is something that they are willing to forget about because 70 or so years ago Jews were persecuted in Europe. The Gaza Strip has been carpet bombed a few times, ten of thousands of Palestinian homes were destroyed and scores (thousands of thousands of Palestinian men, women and children were either killed, maimed or injured but all is forgiven because 70 or so years ago Jews were persecuted in Europe). So anyone who engages in criticism, condemning abuses in Palestine is due to be silenced by being accused of being a Nazi, a Fascist, an anti-Semite and so forth. This is the logic of Political Correctness that certain minorities are openly and abusively using to defend what is indefensible from a Human Right standpoint.

In Britain, there are stringent laws to deter people from engaging in acts of violence and the present political environment amounts to repression that will produce the pressure cooker effect. Those promoting repression will produce exactly what they are trying to avoid. People need to be able to vent their anger without engaging in acts of violence but the more we are made to feel that we live in a Police State the worse things will be.