Peter Rushton and the Mole Thing

Peter Rushton and the Mole Thing

Peter Rushton: Fervent Nationalist or Long Standing Mole

Peter Rushton has usually presented himself as a fervent Nationalist and Holocaust Revisionist but suspicions have existed about his true calling and especially after an investigation was launched quite a few years ago in the days when Nicholas Griffin was a prominent figure in the British National Party.

He was often around following Nationalist personalities that included Jez Turner and Alison Chabloz and was present during court trials. 

Suffice to say that Sonia Gable - wife of Gerry Gable - was also a fervent Nationalist until she was found out as having gone to bed with the then National Front with the sole purpose of being close to the leadership to then reveal to others the inner thinking of  National Front with a view to sabotage the organisation. Much of the process of fragmentation of National Front was instigated by individuals like Sonia Gable that was happy to use her body to extract information.

John Tyndall - Former NF Leader and former BNP Leader

For a Jewess like Sonia Gable, joining National Front and engaging in forbidden relationships with National Front members and its Leadership was yet another example of the end justifies the means. To put it mildly, work didn't have to be a burden. It could be pleasurable and she got a lot of pleasure out of it.

There is a saying about "hiding in plain view is the best way to hide". Peter Rushton has been involved for some time with a publication called "Heritage and Destiny" that is one of the main sources of information for organisations like Searchlight and Hope Not Hate. If you needed a way to demonise anybody standing - in more than one way - Heritage and Destiny is heaven on earth because it provides everything Searchlight and Hope Not Hate might want in order to create and maintain stereotypes and Mr Peter Rushton is very much in charge of Heritage and Destiny. 

After following Alison Chabloz for some time, Peter Rushton and other individuals linked with Heritage and Destiny turned against Alison Chabloz because she dared to use her legal rights to appeal in the courts a sentence that she saw as unfair. Richard Edmonds - former NF, former BNP and presently member of NF under the leadership of Tony Martin is very much linked to Peter Rushton and closed ranks with him and others to attack Alison Chabloz. You would say that with friends like these  you don't need enemies. But then again, have they been friends or merely tools for others who have done their best (or their worst - depends on how you see it) to destroy the Nationalist Movement? 

Soon after this picture was taken near the Cenotaph in Central London (Richard Edmonds, Alison Chabloz and Tony Martin (present leader of National Front) appear on the right of the image)) - Richard Edmonds, Peter Rushton and Michele Renouf launched a series of ongoing visceral attacks against Alison Chabloz that organisations like Hope Not Hate have used to their delight. If the CAA didn't manage to destroy Alison Chabloz, Heritage and Destiny has been there to finish the job started by CAA. This fuels rumours that Heritage and Destiny is nothing more than a branch of Searchlight/Hope Not Hate and that "a well known male Nationalist that has been in fact a Mole for more than 25 years" is de-facto linked to Heritage and Destiny. Without mentioning names, the choices of who could be such Mole are self-evident given the aforementioned.

  

 

 

 

Peter Rushton: Badly misinformed about the character of English Law

Peter Rushton: Badly misinformed about the character of English Law

Once again, Peter Rushton has been found wanting on the pages of Heritage and Destiny. Under the title "Chabloz succeeds in criminalizing Holocaust denial", Peter Rushton blatantly shows that he knows very little about English Law in this regard.

As a matter of fact, Holocaust denial is not a crime in English Law and therefore nothing of what happened last week at Southwark Crown Court changes such fundamental fact.

If Mr Rushton had bothered to show up during the three days of the deliberations at Southwark Crown Court he would have been able to produce a better report of what happened at Southwark Crown Court.

Mr Rushton then writes about the ill informed views of Richard Edmonds about the trial.

That’s because the earlier court judgment could not set a precedent: it applied only to Ms Chabloz’s particular case. Richard Edmonds warned in an article for the Heritage & Destiny website published on January 2nd – ‘Does Alison Chabloz know what she’s doing? Or criminalising “Holocaust”-revisionism by the back door’. Mr Edmonds’ warning has been fully vindicated this week.

He wrote:
“This is not the case with the findings of a Crown Court. It is not impossible that should in February Ms. Chabloz lose her appeal at Southwark Crown Court, then her case, involving as it does elements of the so-called ‘Holocaust’, could be used as a legal precedent to launch criminal prosecutions against Historical revisionists by the back-door, so to speak, in the absence of any formal laws in Britain banning ‘Holocaust’-denial.”

Once again, Richard Edmonds himself shows lack of acumen regarding the legal process and makes assumptions that are not based on fact. Richard Edmonds is writing about something he didn't witness and knows very little about.

Unfortunately, Peter Rushton - a man classed as a historian - couldn't stick to facts because neither him nor Richard Edmonds bothered to show up to really know what happened. 

It is fact that certain countries like France consider that Holocaust Denial is a crime. In the United Kingdom, Holocaust Denial is not a crime and a three day trial did not set up a precedent of any kind in this regard.

It is fact that millions of Jews were harassed, persecuted, tortured and killed in a variety of ways. No amount of revisionism can change that. Playing with numbers doesn't change the horrendous nature of what happened.

To say that the Holocaust didn't happen is to say that Adolf Hitler never existed, that Mein Kampf was never written, that the speeches made about getting rid of Jews were never made, that the Geheime Staatspolizei, the Schutzstaffel, the Waffen SS and even end units of the Wehrmacht proper were not committed to the expulsion, imprisonment and eradication of Jews.

This is John Tyndall, high ranking official of the National Front and later founder of the BNP of whom Richard Edmonds was a great admirer. Most probably one of the reasons why so called members of National Action show themselves with the same flag. White supremacists, Jew haters. 

We are talking about National Socialists that refuse to accept one of the core principles of National Socialism. The Holocaust did happen. We can discuss about numbers, about places and about methods used but no amount of discussion can erase what actually happened.

All the talk about who is and who isn't a revisionist coming from the authors of Heritage and Destiny is absolute crap generated by personal animosity and hatred.