When people talk: Muslims and Nick Griffin in dialogue

https://rumble.com/v3ygoxa-nick-griffin-jews-zionism-the-far-right-and-islam-in-europe-bb-113.html

As Winston Churchill said it: Jaw Jaw is better than War War.

The Lion's logic and the nature of war

 

The Lion's Logic and the nature of war

Adolf Hitler said that once war starts there are no civilians. This goes together with the Lion's Logic. 

Lion's have to fight with other Lions to assert their power and when they prevail the most probable outcome is that the cubs of the defeated Lion are killed.

My father explained the Lion's Logic to me in very simple terms. If you allow the children of your enemies to survive, they will be a constant danger to your own existence.

The reason the Jews, men, women and children, were sent to the camps for extermination is that Germany was following the Lion's Logic. You don't allow children to live to become a threat to your own existence. The fact that Zionism and Israel do exist proves that Adolf Hitler was right in this regard. If you allow any survivors then your own survival will be in doubt.

The logic of the Palestinian conflict between Palestinian and Jews is living proof that since the Lion's Logic is not being applied. As long as Palestinian children are left alive and as lond as Jewish children are left alive the conflict will go on and on and on. Extermination is the only sure solution.

In war there are no civilians. There are only friends and foes. All sides proved that there are no civilians. The thought when bombing British cities and when bombing German cities was pretty evident. There were no civilians. There were Britons and Germans and the idea was to kill as many as possible to prevail. The defeated don't make good material. The sick and the infirm don't make good material. The disabled don't make good material. The sexually dysfunctional - including those mentally sexually dysfunctional - must be exterminated to build a stronger nation. Violence exists for a very good reason.

Refugees are inferior people. People who refuse to stand up and fight.

https://www.facebook.com/nationalistforum

Palestine:has immigration turned host countries into parts of the battlefield?

Decades ago, Palestine seemed to be a long way away from Europe, but today Europe has become very much part of Palestine. The boundaries have become blurred with local politicians talking about what is happening as if Europe itself at the centre of what is happening in the Middle East, with people reacting for or against the parties involved in a conflict that has been lasting practically since the British decided to promote partition and the creation of a state practically entirely made up of Eastern Europeans surrounded by Arab nations.

Present inhabitants of Israel are much more closely related to the peoples of the countries where they lived for centuries than to the original inhabitants of those we came to know as Jews. The creation of the State of Israel is in fact part of yet another European Crusade and this has been very much part of the problem since the very beginning. Zionism is much more associated with ideology than it is associated with religion. Even today, despite many decades, there are clear differences between different brands of Judaism, but some are more powerful than others. The creation of a racial theocratic state was a disastrous mistake. The arrival of massive numbers of white Europeans elicited an immediate reaction.

   

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

Introduction:

In the midst of an international crisis generated by the spread of Corona Virus, other battles are being fought. The apparent disappearance of the British National Party from the political arena under what Adam Walker and Clive Jefferson - present Leader and Deputy Leader - defined as "new leadership style", the BNP became a ghost in British politics. This led to the formation of groups like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters. Her attempt to fill up the void has been shown as no more than sheer opportunism using part of the political agenda of the British National Party and mixing it with contents that never had anything to do with British Nationalism.

More than once, Anne Maria Waters has found herself "in choppy seas", trying and failing to define a coherent agenda. On the one hand, she talks about keeping Britain British. On the other, she has a liberal agenda that goes very much against keeping Britain British. On the one hand, she states that she rejects the ways of the British National Party and of traditional British Nationalism and on the other hand she is surrounded by elements of the BNP that constitute the core of For Britain.

For a while, she had the support of British Nationalists, despite the fact that many of her stances go directly against fundamental values of British Nationalism. Having said that, the publication of a video launching a frontal attack against British Nationalists and using the usual tools used by others to misrepresent British Nationalism, she appears to have shot herself in the foot. Some comentators have indicated that the hatred she has expressed against Islam has more to do with her own sexual preferences than with a genuine attempt to keep Britain British. For Britain seems to be a one man band or, to put it more appropriately, a one woman band.

Essay:

"Nationalists up and down the country were struck with astonishment following publication, Friday April 10th, of a YouTube video by For Britain leader, Anne Marie Waters, attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative.

Questions are now being asked as to who - or what - could have triggered Ms Waters into humiliating herself and her party in a move that further deepens the divide between civic and ethno-nationalists.

To answer the question, we perhaps need to look at events dating back twelve months or so, when certain prominent figures within the Tommy Robinson and For Britain movements widened their reading lists to include works on the Frankfurt School and Holocaust Revisionism. One such notable figure, Shazia Hobbs, was a regular contributor to TR News - a website dedicated to Tommy Robinson, apparently run by staunch Tommy advocate and self-confessed "Nazi Jew", Avi Yemeni, currently residing in Australia. As Shazia's interest and knowledge increased, she published a feature on TR News entitled  "Hypocrisy". As most people know, the Tommy Robinson movement has no problem with any criticism of Islam; less so when the criticism is directed at Judaism. Without explanation, Shazia's article was quietly removed from the website by TR News editors.

Shortly after, Tommy again found himself behind bars. In a disastrous PR move, marking the beginning of the end for the Tommy movement, TR News published a video entitled "How to Burn a Nazi". The video was a brutal, unwarranted attack on Patriotic Alternative leader, Mark Collett, Shazia Hobbs and another former prominent Team Tommy activist, Dionne Møller aka Secret Sources. It's necessary to remind readers here that the video was published using the name of Tommy Robinson whilst Tommy himself was in prison. From then on, support for Tommy Robinson began to fade, which is hardly surprising. Tommy was seen to have stabbed some of his brightest and best elements in the back: elements who are true British patriots, born and bred in this country, unlike Avi of Oz and Brian of Tel Aviv.

At the same time, over the past few months, interest in ethno-nationalism and, in particular, Patriotic Alternative (PA) has increased, notably by way of contributions from a new wave of younger, talented content creators, who understand the plight facing future generations and who are motivated enough to seek and campaign for reasonable solutions. Citing the infamous 14 words, these youngsters, mainly inspired by Mark Collett, PA deputy leader Laura Towler and other prominent figures within PA circles, propose feasible strategies with which to tackle public opinion on the demographic crisis facing the British Isles and the west in general. Making the most out of the COVID19 Lockdown, for example, an army of online Groypers have been brigading suitable political targets. (Check out Natty's calls to LBC's Nick Ferrari and UNWAShED's livestreams on YouTube). Last month, the second ever Patriotic Alternative conference was held just outside London. The event was a huge success, attended by 200 smartly-dressed patriots from all walks of life and of all ages, with the youngest just 15 years of age.

Now, fast forward to Ms Waters' uncanny decision to put out a less vicious but nonetheless similar video to "How to burn a Nazi", attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative. As noted in the recent article on this blog, Ms Waters' and Tommy were - and possibly still are – quite close associates. Both follow the counter-jihad line, shrivelling in horror and squealing like leftists at the slightest mention of one particular ethnic community or of certain aspects of WW2 historiography.

The strategy used by Anne Marie Waters in her video - namely, to defame and smear her political rivals as "racists" who wish to "round up black people" – has backfired spectacularly, as seen by the swift removal of her video shortly after it had been shared on the TR News Telegram channel :
Presumably, someone ordered Avi Yemeni to take the video down. The YouTube original - where comments were originally disabled and then reactivated following complaints - has received a battering, both in the comments section and in the thumbs-up thumbs-down ratio. At the time of writing, there are just 800 likes to 1.6k dislikes.

So, why did Ms Waters choose to shoot herself and her own party in the foot? Was she badly advised by someone in her entourage? At the beginning of the video, filmed Friday morning, she mentions being flooded with messages about Patriotic Alternative and Mark Collett...

Certain sources appear to believe that Ms Waters was shown a photograph posted the previous evening on Facebook, showing Shazia Hobbs together with persecuted singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz in attendance at the recent PA conference.

No doubt that there are spies on Alison Chabloz’s Facebook page who sometimes send information to Hope Not Hate (HNH). Definite proof of this was seen last year when HNH Head of Intel, Matthew Collins, fished several of Alison's "friends only" posts from her timeline and then posted them on Twitter. The social media platform forced Collins to delete. But that is beside the point.

At the same time Ms Waters' published her video, the banner on her YouTube channel was changed. The banner now features a photograph of Ms Waters, also in the company of Shazia, taken at a 2016 demo.










Ms Waters' move provoked this reaction from Shazia:

To complicate matters further, Matthew Collins and the rest of the Hope Not Hate cabal aren't the only ones champing at the bit to have Alison Chabloz once again clamped in irons - for singing songs. Unlike Ms Waters and many other civic and ethno-nationalists, Alison has never been associated with the Tommy Robinson movement. On the contrary, her legal troubles are the direct result of Alison being targeted by people within Team Tommy, and in particular via the dirty deeds of Ambrosine Shitrit from London.

Mrs Shitrit is known to have financially supported Tommy fans, paying travel costs and hotels to ensure large crowds at pro-Tommy demos and court hearings. Indeed, the day Alison Chabloz was convicted, all the news headlines were grabbed... you've guessed it! - by Tommy Robinson getting himself arrested outside Leeds Crown Court. And that's not all: whilst Tommy was stealing media attention up in Leeds, a posse of his close associates, including Jonathan Hoffman and Sharon Klaff, rolled up outside Alison's court case, waving Israeli flags, cheering her conviction and displaying aggressive behaviour towards her supporters.

Who persuaded Tommy that it was a wise idea to go to Leeds that day, in possible breach of a court order..? - A move that did eventually see Tommy back in jail.

Admittedly, there is no evidence of Mrs Shitrit or Hope Note Hate sending the photo of Shazia and Alison at the Patriotic Alternative conference to Ms Waters. There is, however, a third possibility.

Readers will perhaps remember an ongoing Battle of Wills between Alison Chabloz and ex-model, Michele Renouf, which culminated in a series of defamatory articles about Alison, penned by two of Mrs Renouf's closest allies, Richard Edmonds and Peter Rushton. Four articles in total were published, labelling Alison as "a traitor and a saboteur", demanding her "surgical removal from movement circles" and even holding her responsible for the death of Professor Robert Faurisson (who was 89 years old at the time).

Last May, Rushton threatened to sue Alison Chabloz in a remarkable move that ensured he would no longer be able to mention her name without being immediately ridiculed.

Since then, others have carried the torch on behalf of Mrs Renouf, attempting to characterise Alison as a “leftist lover of Islam” whenever the opportunity arises. The schema, like the sockpuppetry, is predictable, as seen in this series of comments published by the same people under two videos, published six months' apart:

Note the comment above by "Jack Doe" (one of the pseudos used by ex-BNP electoral candidate, Julie Lake from Bristol) that Alison Chabloz would be "out of the loop"... It must have come as a nasty shock to learn that Alison Chabloz was welcomed by Mark and Laura into the Patriotic Alternative movement. The news also appears to have left Hope Not Hate speechless, for once. Furthermore, Alison's presence at the Patriotic Alternative conference and her work with the Patriotic Groypers must be absolutely devastating, both for Ambrosine Shitrit and for Michele Renouf.

These people will stop at nothing. Ambrosine Shitrit continues to lie and smear on social media and, worse still, the Rushton-Renouf camp appears to be spreading further damaging rumours that Mark Collett would be responsible for having caused a massive split in the movement. A sure sign of desperation and, of course, highly ironic, coming from those who are in fact responsible for having engineered the split in the first place. They didn't attend the PA conference, and they were not missed in the slightest.

This latest split in the movement is probably the best thing to have happened in British nationalist politics for over a decade. The chaff have sorted themselves out from the wheat, into their own little ghetto,  now further removed from the main stage of British nationalism than even the Team Tommy civ-nats.

We will probably never know who was responsible for tipping Anne Marie Waters over the edge and undermining any slim chance she has left of gaining authority and credibility. Natural justice has been served. Here and now, we as nationalists must focus on the essential and spread the 14 words: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

Source: Nationalist Forum

BBC's pitfalls and Rory Stewart's obstinacy talking about putting Theresa May's Deal to the vote yet again

BBC's pitfalls and Rory Stewart's obstinacy talking about putting Theresa May's Deal to the vote yet again

Lack of due diligence led the BBC into a trap of its own making. Trying to question Boris Johnson about comments he made long before he became a leadership contender, the BBC invited an Imam to talk about Islamophobia only to find out hours later that the said Iman that has now been expelled by his Mosque and by the school where he was Deputy Headmaster had been writing anti-Semitic comments and derogatory comments about women. Not a happy time for the BBC that was recently put on the spot for getting rid of free TV Licenses for over 75s and for the amounts paid to certain individuals, salaries paid with the income produced by TV Licenses.

Rory Stewart made a fundamental gaffe. The foundation of his argument to become Prime Minister was the idea of trying to push through the House of Commons the very same deal negotiated by Theresa May that was rejected by the House of Commons three times. In the first round he got 19 votes and manage to increase his support to 37 votes, but right after the BBC debate his support simply collapsed losing 10 votes of the 37 he had.

Tomorrow, there be will another round and there would be additional rounds until two candidates are left with the most votes. A series of hustings will take place across the country in which members of the Conservative Party will listen and then vote to decide who is going to be the next British Prime Minister. But, as Churchill stated, "Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." 

The newly elected Conservative Prime Minister will have to deal with the same fragmented Parliament and as the October 31, 2019 deadline approaches tensions will rise even more. With the EU in a state of disarray, with the Labour Party extremely divided, nobody is the in mood for negotiations. The choice is still a binary option.

Labour Party: It is not anti-Semitic to criticize Israel

Labour Party: It is not anti-Semitic to criticize Israel

Criticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic but there is a Zionist Witch-hunt going on across the United Kingdom.

Labour Party activists are being hunted from within the Labour Party and some of them are being expelled.

The CAA - Mossad within Number Ten Downing Street - has self-declared links with the British Prime Minister and with Police Forces in the United Kingdom that are being used as part of a Zionist-organised persecution of anybody who dares to stand against Zionism or dares to criticize Israel's actions in Palestine including the deportation of African refugees that are being thrown out by the government of Israel that is carrying out military operations in Syria and talking about annexing the West Bank - a meeting of the Likud Party supported further annexation of territories that were not party of the original Jewish State of Israel as sanctioned and authorised by the Organisation of the United Nations in 1948.

In the meantime civil freedoms in the United Kingdom are being eroded and anti-Terror legislation is being used by Zionist organisations to persecute anybody who dares to criticize Israel or questions its propaganda apparatus.

As part of the destruction of civil freedoms, Habeas Corpus and the Presumption of Innocence have been technically abolished. Today, everybody is guilty until proven innocent. Detention without trial for political reasons is now a reality in the United Kingdom turning the clock back to the times of Autocratic Rule in which Monarchs could imprison and execute political opponents.

 
Sadly, this is happening in the United Kingdom in which in some cases the names of those arrested and put on trial are kept secret as if the authorities were afraid of public opinion. Secrecy is often a synonym of Dirty.

British Soldiers, people who put their lives on the line of fire for Queen and Country, are being kept in British jails before trials have even started and remanded in custody. Trust, what Trust? Justice, what justice?

Ken Livingstone attacked for telling the truth about Das Dritte Reich and the Jewish Question

Ken Livingstone is absolutely right when he says that Adolf Hitler supported the idea of sending Jews to Palestine.

Policies regarding what National Socialist Germany called the Jewish Question were evolving as was evolving the geopolitical situation in Europe and elsewhere.

The first stage was Voluntary Immigration and in this regard the 1926 Balfour Declaration combined with the declared aim of the Zionist Movement of creating the Jewish State of Israel in Palestine coincided with the policy of Voluntary Immigration.
This is why one of the first if not the first Jewish Agency for Palestine was created in National Socialist Germany.

Following the München Pakt of 1938, the belief was that there wasn't going to be any war in Europe. Neville Chamberlain on his return to Britain after signing the documents that secured the transfer of the Sudetenland to Das Dritte Reich told everybody that peace in Europe had been safeguarded. The images of a delighted Neville Chamberlain on his return from Germany tell things as they were. Germany and Britain were then in very good terms and since Britain controlled Palestine at the time the idea of creating a State of Israel and sending Jews from Europe to Palestine was a very plausible thing to do.

The problem was that many Jews across Europe were not so enthusiastic about leaving behind the wealth and comforts of Europe to have a primitive existence in what was then Palestine. Therefore, despite all the calls of alarm raising across Europe about the way Jews were being treated, most Jews chose to stay in Europe, although some of them including Albert Einstein had left Europe even before the rise of Adolf Hitler to power in 1933. Albert Einstein left Germany in 1932.

The next stage would have been Deportation. Deportation or Expulsion would have been extremely difficult because in some countries - including Britain - Jews coming from Germany were thought to be Germans. When a group of Orthodox Jews wearing their typical attires arrived in Britain they went sent to Australia. There was little awareness amongst the general public about events happening in Europe.

On September 1, 1939, the period of goodwill between Britain and Germany was coming to an end. Neville Chamberlain sent an ultimatum to Germany asking Germany to withdraw its armies from Poland. On September 3, 1939 both Britain and France declared war against Germany. Voluntary Immigration and Deportation were no longer valid options.

On June 22, 1941, Germany invaded the Soviet Union. All the peaceful avenues were coming to an end. The beginning of Unternehmen Barbarossa was in itself confirmation that for Jews in Europe options were quickly running out. It must be said that policies about Jews, even in occupied countries, were not always clear. Poland was divided in several sectors under German occupation and there was differential treatment. In some areas they treated with extreme cruelty and in others treatment was not so harsh and life expectancy was higher.

One fundamental event took place in Berlin that is known as the Wannsee Conference. On January 20th, 1942, Heinrich Himmler, Reinhard Heydrich and other heads of the SS and of the Wehrmacht met to discuss the Jewish Question and the next stage. But let us be clear. The Wannsee Conference took place in 1942, in the winter of 1942, after the start of Unternehmen Barbarossa.

The decisions made in January 1942 would have been inconceivable when Germany still had the options of Voluntary Immigration and Deportation.

Ken Livingstone is absolutely right. At the initial stages, Adolf Hitler wanted to get rid of Jews by either Voluntary Immigration or Deportation. Germany worked together with the Zionist Movement because at the time, Germany wanted to get rid of Jews and the Zionist Movement wanted to take Jews to Israel to implement what had been promised in the 1926 Balfour Declaration.