Does the ceremonial have anything to do with Christianity?

 

Does the ceremonial, ritual and clothing have anything to do with Christianity?

For centuries, so called Christian churches and so called Christian organizations have been characterized by all kinds of peculiar attires that have nothing to do with Christianity.

Who invented 'Nuns'? Who said that certain attires had anything to do with the teachings of Jesus? Did Jesus talk about building temples full of statues and decorations or talk about the proclamation of so called saints? No, he did not. Jesus was not immortal. He was made immortal by Emperor Constantine. So all that has been spread for centuries by organised churches has been an an absolute lie. Jesus was prophet, a mortal man that had wife and children. Where did the abstentinence vows come from? Another invention that has served to hide homosexuality and depravity. It is no surprise to learn about sexual abuses within churches.

How does he look like? Like a clown. And there are many of them. Recent scandals are not even the tip of the iceberg.

I recently spoke with two ladies working for the Church of England and ask them why they don't go around spreading the Word of Jesus. They told me that they don't do that because 'we are not Evangelists'. Well, truet Christianity is evangelical. By saying that they are not Evangelical they go against Jesus.

As more and more temples get sold to developers or are taking over by other religious organisations, the fate of the Church of England and other churches is all too obvious.

Muslims are everywhere preaching Islam, in the same way that true Christians went around and go around preaching the word of Jesus. I recently met a group of Muslims in the centre of town. They asked me what languages did I speak and they offered me a copy of the Quran in different languages, including several European languages.

What is the Church of England doing to promote Christianity? Absolutely nothing. Or even worse, with every single scandal, they are proving that the Church of England is a source of corruption of all kinds.

  

The Lion's logic and the nature of war

 

The Lion's Logic and the nature of war

Adolf Hitler said that once war starts there are no civilians. This goes together with the Lion's Logic. 

Lion's have to fight with other Lions to assert their power and when they prevail the most probable outcome is that the cubs of the defeated Lion are killed.

My father explained the Lion's Logic to me in very simple terms. If you allow the children of your enemies to survive, they will be a constant danger to your own existence.

The reason the Jews, men, women and children, were sent to the camps for extermination is that Germany was following the Lion's Logic. You don't allow children to live to become a threat to your own existence. The fact that Zionism and Israel do exist proves that Adolf Hitler was right in this regard. If you allow any survivors then your own survival will be in doubt.

The logic of the Palestinian conflict between Palestinian and Jews is living proof that since the Lion's Logic is not being applied. As long as Palestinian children are left alive and as lond as Jewish children are left alive the conflict will go on and on and on. Extermination is the only sure solution.

In war there are no civilians. There are only friends and foes. All sides proved that there are no civilians. The thought when bombing British cities and when bombing German cities was pretty evident. There were no civilians. There were Britons and Germans and the idea was to kill as many as possible to prevail. The defeated don't make good material. The sick and the infirm don't make good material. The disabled don't make good material. The sexually dysfunctional - including those mentally sexually dysfunctional - must be exterminated to build a stronger nation. Violence exists for a very good reason.

Refugees are inferior people. People who refuse to stand up and fight.

https://www.facebook.com/nationalistforum

 Abortion: while everybody talks about geopolitical crisis and economics, an earthquake hits the USA

I don't think that many people were expecting this to happen. It is a bit of a 9/11 moment. The Twin Towers have been hit all over again. Some call it a Constitutional Earthquake. It is thought that terminations will be instantly banned in not less than 13 of the 50 states and that in at least 26 states the will be moves to ban abortion altogether. Anti-abortion demonstrators gathered outside the USA Supreme Court to celebrate the ruling. 

Now, let's look at the list of states that have what is called 'trigger laws' in place: Arkansas, Idado, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming.

The USA is changing direction of travel and what happens now in the rest of the Anglo world. It is reported that this evening there will be demonstrations at the USA Embassy in London. According to the ruling, the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the peo-ple and their elected representatives.

Christian Conservatives are turning the clock back. What else is in store to surprise us even more? This could be the beginning of a crusade to bring back a more traditionalist USA, a version of the USA that is closer to the version the Founding Fathers imagined and hope that America could be. Will the American winds reach Europe? Prime Minister Boris Johnson immediately stood up to criticize the move and said that it was a move backwards. Since when America sneezes Britain catches a cold, I don't doubt that traditionalist sector of the British society will soon been invigorated by the ruling of the USA Supreme Court and the debate will be re-ignited in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. What will happen in Hollywood? The movie industry created an image of the USA that people believe to be America itself. Later on, Hollywood openly portrayed a more liberal approach that promoted the acceptability of abortion and homosexuality. Hollywood changed America. Will America now change Hollywood? Looking forward to see how this pans out.

LGBT and mainstream religions

The message by Pope Francis that the Catholic Church will not bless same sex marriages doesn't come as a surprise. In fact, it has been part of religious doctrine for many hundreds of years. The Anglican Church itself has been in trouble because several branches of the Protestant communion reject the liberal attitudes of the English branch with regards to women as priests and with regards to homosexuality.

In fact, the Bible is about Adam and Eve, not Jenny and Mary or Peter and John. It is assumed that God is male - Father - and the emphasis is on the biological duality of Man and Woman.

The Church doesn't ignore the fact that in the real world there are heterosexual people, bisexual people and homosexual people, apart from other categories that you can imagine like pansexual or asexual.

The Catholic Church is not about Evolution. It is about Creed. The fact remains that if you are going to join any club, it is assumed that you sign up to the principles, rules and regulations of the said club. LGBT Catholics is a contradiction in terms. Despite the fact that there is homosexuality within the Catholic Church (the Catholic Church cannot escape the realities of humanity), there is the understanding that whoever calls himsels a Catholic will live by the principles of Catholicism.

Having said that, you have the choice to maintain your life choices by joining other religious denominations that allow you to maintain your life choices. Therefore, the confrontation between those who want to promote LGBT messages and the Catholic Church is totally unnecessary. You can join another Church or Religion, you can practice your religion privately as your dialogue between you and God or you can do without any religion whatsoever.

What people do in private as part of consensual activities is their business as long as they don't violate laws and regulations established to protect vulnerable adults and children. The same goes for religion. You either believe or don't believe. You don't need Churches or religious organisations to believe. 

The LGBT movement is a political movement that is constantly trying to force the rest of society to live by what they stand for. This is where the problem arises. Other people are also entitled to live according to their own beliefs. If the Catholic Church chooses to stand for and to stick to their beliefs, so be it. You don't have to be a member of the Catholic Church. Nobody forces you to be or to become a member of the Catholic Church. Inquisitions should be a thing of the past. By seeking to impose a Forced Conversion of the Catholic Church, the LGBT movement is shooting itself in the foot. 

Individuals who seek to be respected regardless of gender differences or life choices should understand that trying to force the Catholic Church to accept something that the Catholic Church couldn't accept because it goes against the Creed violates freedom of choice. If you don't like the club, join another club or create a club of your own. 

Personally, I treat everybody fairly as individuals, regadless of gender or sexual orientation. I do not demonise people because of their gender or sexual orientation. Having said that, the Catholic Church has the legitimate right to stick to the Catholic Creed.

Nearly half of British women sexually dissatisfied

Nearly half of British women sexually dissatisfied

Pay attention to this: 49 per cent of women between the ages of 25 and 34 complain of lack of sexual enjoyment. Research found that women who experienced unhappiness in their relationships had been diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections and were unable to communicate with their partners are more likely to have low sexual function. 

Alcohol use was linked to an unhealthy sex and less pleasurable sexual life and an important factor. Taboos about sexuality - unbelievable in the Twenty-First Century - in which many speak about sexual liberation - mean increasing levels of sexual frustration that turn into a myriad of emotional and psychological problems. 

A society that is so inclined and prone to accept 'alternative sexuality' (bisexuality and homosexuality included) it seems like an contradiction in terms that heterosexual relationships are in deep trouble.

Add to the aforementioned the fact than one in seven women have fertility problems and the guilt, frustration and misery associated with the said fertility problems and this is a ticking bomb with enormous social repercussions.

When we talk about family cohesion and about an increasing number of adults living on their own, undoubtedly sexual dysfunction is a crucial factor as the root cause of unstable households that when they don't end up with divorce can lead to very unhappy realities not only for the partners involved but fundamentally for the children that will be affected by unhappiness and in some cases by  domestic violence that will affect their emotional and physical development.

In Germany, the powerful union AG Metal has fought for the reduction of the working week to give people - and especially family - more time to spend as a family and for couples to have more quality time.

Britain, instead, forges ahead pushing the limits of what is humanly healthy and desirable. Long working hours, financial worries, high levels of alcohol consumption and very poor performance in bed can be said to be the foundations of social degradation and social disintegration.

Time to stop promoting 'alternative lifestyles' and to support heterosexuality. Time to pay attention and to support families for the sake of the country.  

  

Simon Hughes is openly bisexual but Tim Farron constantly struggles with sexual issues

Tim Farron constantly struggles when asked about issues regarding sexuality.

Once again the Liberal Democrats struggles to give a straight answer. He struggled before when asked about homosexuality. Now, he struggles when asked about abortion.

Simon Hughes publicly stated that he is bisexual. I would like to have Tim Farron and Simon Hughes together, in front of television cameras, and ask a whole range of questions about sexuality.

This man has serious issues to answer for. As Liberal Democrats Leader he should be able to give straight answers about sexuality as his inability to provide straight answers on this issues increasingly looks like a very serious personality flaw.

Other political leaders have been very clear about where they stand on the said issues and have prominent representatives that are openly homosexual or bisexual that had stood in the House of Commons. Tim Farron is letting himself down and is letting his political party down by not providing clear cut answers.

David Ward: Liberal Democrats are neither Democratic nor Liberal

Whatever your views on Palestine and about what is happening in Palestine, it is inconceivable that a Prospective Member of Parliament could have been deselected and put on a trial because he has strong views on Palestine. A few days ago, Tim Farron who is reportedly a staunch Christian struggled to give a straight answer about homosexuality. This is called hypocrisy. Later on, put against the wall, he came up with an answer or what I call 'a political answer' because we cannot trust that the answer he gave reflects what Tim Farron actually believes in. David Ward committed the crime of having strong views on Palestine and in the United Kingdom anybody who has strong views on Palestine risks being called Nazi, Anti-Semite and Jew hater. Never mind if many Jews across the world - including in Israel - are highly critical of what is happening in Palestine and they themselves disagree with what is being done in Palestine. But whatever your views on Palestine, we have a fundamental right to agree or disagree, a right that has been discarded by the Liberal Democratic Party.   I hope you don't mind me getting in touch with you again. I believe I previously had contact when you signed my petition demanding that Isreal stopped persecuting the Palestinian people. You may have heard that I have been suspended from the Liberal Democrats just before nominations were due in for candidates in the General Election on 8th June 2017. Someone has made a complaint that my views are not consistent with the Lib Dems. I was properly approved and selected to stand in 2015 and again and for the expected General Election in 2020. My appeal against the complaint cannot be heard until after the 8th June. I believe this has been done to stop me standing as a candidate in the General election. The Lib Dems have imposed a candidate on the local party of volunteers who have been publicly criticised for selecting me. People have a right not to vote for me but what I will not accept is being prevented from standing as someone who has been outspoken against a foreign country which has numerous UN Resolutions condemning it for the way it behaves. Standing up to my detractors and trying to become an independent MP is at a huge personal and financial cost. I had already raised the cost of fighting the election as a Lib Dem but that cannot now be used. I have got one week to raise the £12,800 pounds it costs to be a candidate in a British General Election. Please, can you help me?  Please send whatever you can afford.   Best wishes David Ward Independent Candidate for Bradford East Donate to My Campaign Printed [hosted] by Mailchimp. Promoted and Published by David Ward (Independant Candidate for Bradford East) on behalf of David Ward. 8 Greenfield Lane, Idle Bradford, BD10 8PT Copyright © 2017 David Ward, All rights reserved. Your Email has been added to this list because you have contacted David Ward in the past regarding the plight of Palestinian people. Our mailing address is: David Ward 8 Greenfield Lane Idle Bradford, West Yorkshire BD10 8PT United Kingdom Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

The Guardian: half of all British Muslims think homosexuality should be illegal poll finds

Following an attack at a club in Orlando, Florida in which 50 people died, once again we see yet another example of a cultural clash.

Although the attack took place in the United States of America where there is a very heated political struggle at a time when the country is heading towards the election of a new President, you sense that something is not totally right in Paradise. A survey carried out by Channel Four tells you the difference between fantasy and reality.

On the one hand, you have politicians telling you that we all love each other and that we are one and the same. On the other hand, you have the truth of conflicting values that can sometimes lead to tragedies like the one that happened in the heart of the gay community.

To be fair, homophobia is not the monopoly of Muslim Communities. Quite a few people outside Muslim Communities don't feel comfortable with what is generally described as gay rights. Not long ago, two white girls - non Muslim girls - beat and kicked a gay man to death in Central London.

Having said that, we must recognise that amongst religious communities and in particular Muslim Communities there are anti-homosexuality attitudes that can very well lead to homophobic violence.

The situation is even more difficult if homophobia is linked with political and geopolitical agendas. Mentioning that Islamic State (or whatever it is called these days) stated that the killer follows Islamic State's agenda gives what would have been the actions of a loner a completely different dimension.

There is the certain danger of copycat killers, of individuals that given the amount of publicity given to the events in Orlando, Florida, might decide to gain notoriety by carrying out similar attacks and do so on the name of Militant Islam.

People should be reminded of the fact that regardless of strong views that they might have about homosexuality, the said views are not a license to go around engaging in acts of violence and that religious views are not a licence to harass, hurt or kill those you do not agree with.