Shazia Hobbs: I have zero affliation with For Britain

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Shazia Hobbs: I have zero affliation with For Britain

A video released by Anne Marie Waters in the last few hours looks and sounds like a desperate attempt to shore up her power base. 

Unfortunately for Anne Marie Waters, the body of evidence against her is much too big to be able to put things under the carpet.

Writer Shazia Hobbs used to support Tommy Robinson.

Here, Shazia Hobbs speaks at a rally organised in support of Tommy Robinson. On the right of the image, you see none other than Gerard Batten - former UKIP Leader and former MEP. Gerard Batten still supports Tommy Robinson, but the relationship with Shazia Hobbs went sour.

 But things seemed to have gone terribly wrong because Shazia Hobbs speaks her own mind and becaused of it she came under attack and several high profile supporters of both Tommy Robinson and For Britain are walking away and joining Patriotic Alternative. Shazia Hobbs stated: Anne Marie Waters has a cheek to use my picture as her YouTube banner. Where the hell was her support when the 'Burn a Nazi' video was released about me? I have zero affiliation with For Britain and fully support Patriotic Alternative.

Shazia Hobbs speaking at the 2018 For Britain National Conference

The fact that more and more people are walking away from both Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters has been indicated as the fundamental reason why Anne Marie Waters launched an attack against Patriotic Alternative. Anne Marie Waters knows that her best people are leaving her and she didn't have too much support to start with.

Here is another pictures showing Shazia Hobbs and Katie Hopkins

I meet Anne Marie Waters a few months ago at the Merchant of Bishopgate located at Liverpool Street Station in Central London. There I saw a woman complaining about not even being able to organize political meetings and showing herself as target of persecution.

For Britain is almost a one man (one woman) band. Like UKIP and others, they showed themselves to be politically irrelevant. Whenever Anne Marie Waters is asked to be more specific, a sea of contradictions appears.

I estimate that every single negative mention of For Britain is seen as a blessing because it creates the illusion of political existence and relevance.

Anne Marie Waters and Katie Hopkins

What do Anne Marie Waters, Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson have in common? Their visible love affair with Israel. The only problem is that it is yet another example of unrequited love. 

Now, let's look at the picture. Some Jewish operators are behind the media machinery of Tommy Robinson, for example. Unfortunately for all of them, once Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party was massively defeated in a General Election and replaced by Keith Starmer's Labour Party (Keith Starmer is married to Jewess Victoria Alexander and both of their children are being raised in the Jewish faith), who will need operators like Anne Marie Waters, Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson, all of whom have peculiar links with those they say that they are against? 

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties hypocrisy

Gerard Batten's Dilemma is the consequence of other political parties' hypocrisy

Gerard Batten and Tommy Robinson

Gerard Batten's Dilemma was created by Nigel Farage when Nigel Farage - without questioning - surrendered UKIP to Political Correctness. Why? All other political parties have former BNP members, former NF members, former EDL members and even former IRA members.

The Labour Party has the highest numbers of BNP, NF and EDL former members. In fact, Jeremy Corbyn was elected and re-affirmed as Labour Party Leader with BNP, NF and EDL former members votes.

The BBC didn't look into it. SKY News didn't look into it. They just focused on UKIP to chastise UKIP for something all other political parties have done. A former IRA members represents the Conservative Party in Greater London.

Today, the House of Commons and everything around the Houses of Parliament had to do with Brexit and the votes on a series of amendments presented by both Government and Opposition. I met Gerard Batten and spoke with him about these issues directly. Why? Because the London Regional Press Office asks questions directly. I met Gerard Batten near the House of Commons and we spoke about these issues and the fact that Tommy Robinson contracted as Adviser cannot stand for election representing UKIP because he is not a member of UKIP and he is not a member of UKIP because UKIP's Membership Rules explicitly excludes former members of the BNP and of EDL. Tommy Robinson was a BNP member and was also an EDL member.

But there is another paradox. Despite the fact that officially UKIP Membership Rules exclude former members of BNP, and EDL from becoming members of UKIP, UKIP has members that were at one point in time members of BNP, NF and EDL. How did this happen? Well, those who were not publicly known members of BNP, NF and EDL existed under the radar. 

As Gerard Batten explained to me personally in a face to face conversation, UKIP introduced the said Membership Rules to avoid being infiltrated by BNP, NF and EDL and others.

Nobody knows for certain what will happen on March 29th 2019. Nobody knows what will happen before March 29th 2019. What is certain is that a group of minority parties are struggling to get the support of individuals that occupy practically the same segment of public opinion. The announcement by Nigel Farage that he wants to create a new political party doesn't help. In fact, it divides even more those who share certain political views. 

What will happen when issues like Abortion come to the fore? What will happen when they have to decide on Economic Policies or Foreign Affairs? Will minority parties maintain the same level of support they have until now? They might be united with regards to Islam or Immigration? Will they be united when it comes to a whole range of others issues that any political party has to deal with?