Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!

Amber Rudd banned National Action thinking that they were dangerous. What a fool!

The Windrush Scandal brought Amber Rudd down but her incompetence was shown long before. I knew Jack Renshaw and many of those accused of being members of National Action. None of them would be capable of any acts of terrorism. The whole thing has been a shameful circus for political posturing.

About 85% of inmates in British jails are Muslim. What does this tell you about what is going on? Then came the reports that more whites are being arrested and charged with terrorism. Why? Because they had to use Police Forces to show that they were not being unduly harsh with Muslim criminals. The fact of the matter remains that all those murdered in terrorists acts in the United Kingdom have been killed by Muslim criminals or Muslim converts. Lee Rigby was killed by Muslim converts. A Police Officer was slaughtered in Westminster stabbed by a Muslim convert. Not a single person has been killed by a white terrorists because there are no white terrorists.

Liberals and Marxists want to justify their ideological stances by blaming innocent whites and pursue their campaign of ethnic cleansing that is destroying Europe. ethnic cleansing that will lead to war and to the disintegration of democratic institutions that has taken centuries to forge.

It took centuries for women to be able to vote. Muslims treat women as slaves or at best as second or third class individuals. Many of them believe that they have to deliberately damage women's bodies with the so called Female Genital Mutilation or that they have to be hidden, covered with bed clothing when they walk on the streets. An Asian Lady Peer denounced that Muslim men were importing women to use them as cash cows by exploiting the welfare state by claiming benefits for children of several wives.

Many Muslims believe and they speak openly about it that women only exist to pleasure men. The promise of tens of virgins to deliver sexual pleasures to those who blow up themselves for Allah more than proves the extraordinary disregard for women to be seen not as wives and mothers but as objects to be exploited. They not even respect their own daughters to the point that for ages there have been ongoing investigations about forced marriages and about girls that have been killed or have had to escape, to run away from their families, because they felt that their lives were in danger. This is the Islam, the so called culture, that Liberals and Marxists want to impose on us.

For more than sixteen years, Police and Politicians looked the other way while thousands of vulnerable children were raped and drugged by Muslim gangs and those raising the alert were accused of racism. Instead of protecting vulnerable children, for the said Police Officers and Politicians it was more important to protect their positions at the expense of vulnerable children and they wilfully protected Muslim criminals.

The rage against Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, against Nick Griffin and others is that they not only denounced Muslim depravity and terrorism. They have actively campaigned against Muslim depravity and Muslim Terrorism. The Security Services themselves say on a regular basis that they are quashing terror attempt after terror attempt of Muslim Terrorists and when they failed to do so people died. Lee Rigby was beheaded by people that the Security Services were trying to recruit. They couldn't foil attacks in London and Manchester and people died. We have Hate Priests using public spaces, Mosques and Cultural Centres to spread hatred against Non Muslims. Not only that. We have jails being used to promote Muslim Terrorism. 

The real terrorists have not been members of organisations like National Action. The real terrorists have been supported by Liberals and Marxists.

The icing on the cake was Amber Rudd's actions during the Windrush Scandal. She deliberately lied to Parliament about the immigration shambles in which documents were destroyed and families who came to Britain in good faith have been made to suffer. Whether dealing with Terrorism or dealing immigration, Amber Rudd was not fit for purpose and now she is trying to rock the boat to ignore the will of the British People that in a democratic exercise decided to leave the European Union.

Tommy Robinson is neither Far Right nor Racist

Tommy Robinson is neither Far Right nor Racist

Lizzie Dearden - as a well as whole array of politicians and mass media operators - have falsely accused Tommy Robinson of being Far Right and/or Racist. Why? What are the foundations for such labels? There are no foundations whatsoever. Why is this happening? Because politicians and mass media operators can get away with murder. It is about power without responsibility. 

If you challenge the BBC or private mass media you face a wall. For example, the BBC is judge, jury and prosecutor of its behaviour unless they are challenged by some people with power and financial muscle. Otherwise, the BBC can do whatever. It can destroy innocent people who don't have the power to defend themselves and BBC reporters get away with crime as it is criminal to demonise people who don't have the power to protect themselves.

If try to complain to the board that deals with excesses committed by private mass media, the said board will tell you that they can only deal with mass media that are signatories of a Code of Conduct and only as long as the said Code of Conduct refers to the kind of crime being committed.

To sum up, if you are not powerful both in terms of influence or of financial muscle you don't stand a chance to get a fair hearing. This is execution by power without responsibility.

When the killing of journalists begins, irresponsible journalists will have only themselves to blame. A Member of Parliament already lost their life and many more will follow if the present trend to defame, libel, distort and misrepresent other people goes on.

Britain has changed. Europe has changed. Public anger is growing rapidly and the time will come when no Police Force, no Armed Forces, will be able to prevent a social and political explosion.

Jo Cox MP was embarked in a witch-hunt and this is why she was killed. Many swore to follow the same path and might face the same fate. Demonising innocent people is a boomerang that will come and haunt you and your family. This is a crucial time in the history of Britain and in the history of Europe. Demonising must stop. Labelling must stop. Defaming must stop. Libelling must stop. Distortion must stop.

Brexit and Merkel: British journalists' myopia

 

Brexit and Merkel: British journalists' myopia

When you witness the coverage of negotiations about Brexit, much of the British mass media suffers from political myopia. They try to emphasize how much trouble the British Prime Minister Theresa May is in but they fail to understand the amount of trouble those seen as the stronger party - EU - are facing. In spite of the said myopia, I heard an enlightening question: how much coverage and interest there is in other parts of the EU about Brexit? The answer: not much. In fact, in the rest of the EU the political world is much more interested in a rift caused by differences between EU countries and in particular about the issue of immigration. Brexit is very low in the EU list of priorities given the enormous problems that EU is facing in other areas.

One of the main players - if not the main player - German Chancellor Angela Merkel faces the prospect of not being German Chancellor for much long. She is heading a last minute Coalition of Despair. If any of her partners - either CSU or SPD - or both falter, her government would fall. She could be out before March 2019. In a few days time there will be State Elections in Bavaria - CSU territory. In an effort to keep AfD at bay, the CSU has been increasingly critical of Angela Merkel. Whether this is an electoral strategy to fool German voters or genuine CSU concerns, CSU popularity ratings have been falling.

Brexit: The closer the date of withdrawal, the muddier the waters

Brexit: The closer the date of withdrawal, the muddier the waters...

The official date for British withdrawal from the EU is set but the closer we get to the date the muddier the waters get with a political establishment that is in a state of flux. There are different agendas and according to a particular agenda the scene changes. One particular actor in the said agenda has been Vince Cable - former Liberal Democrat MP - that lost his seat after a very much criticised coalition with the Conservative Party. The Coalition only lasted five years but the consequences for the Liberal Democrats have been long lasting. From being the third party of British politics, the Liberal Democrats are now fourth behind a political party - the Scottish National Party - that is neither British nor Scottish given its political goal of surrendering more and more powers to the European Union.

In 1997, Tony Blair as Prime Minister proceeded to implement Devolution. The idea was to keep Scotland on board after by promising to re-instant the Scottish Parliament. Under John Major as Conservative Party Leader and Prime Minister, the Conservatives had been practically wiped out and Scotland was being run by a Labour/Liberal Democrat Coalition but the threatening presence of SNP was on the horizon. Devolution was an appeasement attempt that went badly wrong. Soon after Devolution, the Labour Party paid a very high price and the SNP took the reins of politics in Scotland pushing ever farther towards Scottish Independence.

During a Conservative government, David Cameron was forced to make promises to keep Scotland in the United Kingdom but it was barely enough to convince Scottish voters not to vote for secession in the Scottish Independence Referendum. The SNP didn't get what it wanted but it became the third party in British politics, pushing Liberal Democrats into fourth place.

The 2017 General Election, a failed attempt by Prime Minister Theresa May to gain an absolute majority made a bad situation worse. The Conservative Party lost its majority and a weakened SNP still had a sizeable representation in Westminster.

Brexit has polarised political parties and both Labour and Conservative became several parties in one. Political fragmentation is all too evident. Labour is divided and Conservatives are divided and what is more nobody could hide what is happening even if they tried to hide what is happening.

This is what led Vince Cable - a party leader without a seat in the House of Commons - to propose the creation of what he calls a new centre party in British politics. Whether this is his way to try to rebrand the Liberal Democrats or a genuine intention to create a new political force remains to be seen. Labour is either pro-Corbyn or anti-Corbyn. The Conservatives are many things. There are those who are openly pro-May, those who are openly anti-May and those who prefer not to show any allegiance while they await developments that will allow them to keep their real intentions under wraps.

March 2019 is not just relevant because it is the month and year when Britain will come out of the EU. For many politicians whose political lives depend on EU membership this means having to think about plan B and plan B effectively means coming back to national politics and having to struggle to remain relevant. The will be competing with those already involved in national politics and competition will be fierce. There is British politics before Brexit and there will be British politics after Brexit.

What Vince Cable talks about - the creation of another political force - could happen naturally as a direct consequence of British politics after Brexit. Both Labour and Conservatives will have to deal with their inconsistencies to remain viable political forces because as things stand it is difficult to see what Labour and Conservatives really stand for.

The grass roots of both Labour and Conservatives are not forgiving. Some MPs might decide to jump out before being pushed. What we know as Deselection is already happening and the partition of so called mainstream political parties is now a real possibility.

Personally, I want Members of Parliament that really mean what they say and political parties who have a clear and demonstrable agenda. A radical change in British politics is long overdue for the sake of having a viable Democracy.




 

Britain secretly planning to attack Syria under false pretenses

Britain secretly planning to attack Syria under false pretenses

Once again, the British government headed by Theresa May is secretly planning to launch an unprovoked attack against Syria, revealing the true colours of the British government that is supporting terrorists abroad while publicly emphasising its role in routing terrorism in the United Kingdom.

While those who raise the alert about Islamic terrorism in the United Kingdom are persecuted and jailed, Theresa May is deliberately launching attacks against the Syrian government that has been winning in the fight against terrorism and regaining control of Syria's sovereign territory.

Despite calls in the House of Commons, Theresa May would once again bypass Parliament to use force against a sovereign country that is not at war with Britain. As this is happening, the voices asking for suspension of diplomatic relations with Britain are rising in the Russian Federation, country that supports Syrian sovereignty against foreign aggression.

But as it happened before, the real objective is not Syria. The real purpose is to continue the process of attacking and eroding countries that are seen close to the Russian Federation The military build-up along the borders of the Russian Federation is significant, so significant that it eclipses the military build-up of the Wehrmacht of National Socialist Germany right before the start of Unternehmen Barbarossa on June 22 1941.

Given the American reaction in 1962 to the positioning of missiles in Cuba, the patience shown by the Russian Federation is much more than remarkable. The Russian Federation has been stoic and has acted responsibly to avoid piling up pressure that could lead to war in Europe.

Unlike the Russian Federation, the British government has shown its determination to bring war to Europe and continues its hostile campaign based on ideology rather than facts. Even today, in the House of Commons, a Conservative MP talked about more expulsions of diplomats. What next? Next is the suspension of diplomatic relations between the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation.

What do people really want? Mainstream political parties might not be the answer

Mainstream political parties might not be the answer.

There were Whigs and Tories, Conservatives and Liberals and later on Conservatives and Labour and Liberals. Britain keeps changing and this is only natural. The system kept evolving. There was a time when only those with a certain income could vote. There was a time when women couldn't vote. The system hasn't been the same. It has changed and needs to keep changing to accommodate new realities.

First-past-the-post might no longer be the answer. In fact, when the London Assembly was conceived the system chosen included a vote per constituency and a London-wide vote. You vote for your chosen candidate at local level and you also vote for a party-candidate regardless of where you live within the Greater London Region.

In time, political parties have become Vote Cooperatives - a blend of people who might have diametrically opposed views on practically every issue and only come together under a label in order to get elected. This is an anomaly that leads to people voting for ideas that they reject simply because they come under the same banner ie Conservative, Labour.

Anna Soubry and Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative Party) and Hilary Benn and Jeremy Corbyn (Labour Party) got elected under the same banners and the present crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was made by the way political parties are organised. Vote Cooperatives lead to confusion and crisis. Journalists and politicians talk about splitting political parties and mention it saying that it would be a catastrophic event. In fact, splitting political parties would be the best thing that could happen because it will clearly show the electorate what political parties really and truly stand for.

For many years, it has been said that the House of Lords is unrepresentative because its members are not elected. The House of Commons is unrepresentative because political parties are marred in confusion. When you vote Conservative or Labour, what are you actually voting for?

We could have several political parties with clear political agendas. We could have two elected chambers - a Senate and a House of Representatives. Senators would be elected nationally and Representatives would 'represent' local constituencies and a specifically written Constitution for everybody to know what the rules are. We could introduce a ballotage system. Senators and Representatives would come out of the first round of elections and a President and Vice-President would be elected after the second round to ensure that they have both cross-party political support.

Einstein defines 'Insanity' as the attempt to get different results using exactly the same methods. We can trust Providence to give us a strong leader or we change the electoral system and have a written Constitution.

The political system is in crisis and it will not be mended because Britain has changed and the political system is very much anchored in the past.

Devolution created a whole set of contradictions that included a Scottish Parliament, a Welsh Assembly and a Northern Ireland Assembly (hasn't been working for more than a year) but failed to create an English Parliament. Devolution should have been about creating a Federal System. You could have National Parliaments and a Federal Parliament in which all nations could be represented. Unfortunately, expediency and a rush to introduce patches instead of generating a coherent political reality has led to paralysis. Driven by circumstances, the Westminster Parliament is forced to introduce legislation to deal with issues that the Northern Ireland Assembly should be dealing with and it isn't dealing with.

Looking at London and the way London is governed, there are virtually power monopolies and no working Opposition. There are no effective power balances. Boroughs are effectively Feudal States and on top of the Boroughs structure there is a London Assembly with limited attributions. Overlapping authorities create costly confusion and limit accountability. So call Safe Seats are the opposite of a working democracy. We have a system in which - in most cases - you already know who is going to win before the election ever takes place.

Political Witch-hunt that will lead to violence

Political Witch-hunt that will lead to violence

There is a a new industry: the industry of political witch-hunt. Britain is becoming a Totalitarian State in which there are special interest groups that are out to create havoc that threatens to destroy public freedoms. 

The irony is that of the havoc created the very same groups that promote havoc will suffer the lethal consequences of what they are doing because where is action there is reaction and this is not just a law of physics. It is a law of life. The one doing the persecution will become prey.

It is most visible when it comes to the political system. We see the Labour Party accused of Anti-Semitism and Racism. We see the Conservative Party accused of Islamophobia. We see individuals that raise the alarm about the abuses committed by Muslims gangs and about the very real risk created by Islamic Extremists being taken to court and jailed simply because they are doing a public service.

The Crown Prosecution Service is being abused and used thanks to political pressure applied by pseudo charitable organisations like the CAA and cases are being created out of thin air to please a minority that has the power to force the Crown Prosecution Service to re-instate cases that had been previously rejected for lack of merit. Rumour and innuendo have become evidence. Something said in anger or a careless comment or even a joke has now become evidence to prosecute individuals who are not engaged in criminal activities and who most likely would not engage in criminal activities and the general public is paying for such nonsense while real crime is spreading across the United Kingdom and left unpunished.

The mass media are also guilty party because they benefit from the climate of fear and uncertainty generated. We are not in Colombia but we might well become Colombia when public anger is directed against irresponsible mass media.

The British mass media are no longer seeking the truth. They are just propaganda machines and this includes the British Broadcasting Corporation that persecutes old ladies for not paying the TV License by pays unjustifiably generous contracts to pseudo stars in a system in which one day A interviews B and C, the next day B interviews A and C and the following day C interviews A and B and it is all part of a club of exceedingly well paid celebrities. This Nomenklatura of the mass media is being paid for by British taxpayers that are forced to swallow propaganda and lies of people who have got an anti-British agenda.

The messages of the mass media are there to justify the political witch-hunt by saying that is fine to go against fundamental rights of some people as long as the rights of those they support are protected. The promote the idea that certain people that they don't like are guilty simply because they are who they are and there will be consequences. The backlash is not far away when mass media and politicians that promote such way of thinking will be targeted and eliminated in a tit for tat operation. 

The mass media, special interest groups and politicians will bring back the 1930s.