Covid-19: good example as weapon

Covid-19: good example as weapon

Covid-19 shows the destructive potential of biological weapons. Biological weapons can cause mayhem socially, economically and politically. While a conventional weapon has relative effect, a biological weapon can completely destabilize an entire country. In just a few weeks, Covid-19 has become practically the one subject of conversation.

Since World War Two, nuclear weapons have been seen as the ultimate deterrent that could prevent major conflicts between countries. Who needs to use nuclear weapons when biological weapons can do a much better job. Even warships loaded with the most advanced technologies cannot operate if crews are infected with biological weapons. Wars can be fought if there is a viable economy to support the war effort. 

Major countries have been affected by Corona Virus and they happen to be members of the NATO alliance.

This is the progressions of numbers of deaths in the UK from the start until today.

Do you honestly believe that it is going to end up soon? Mortality as of today stands at 13.97%. This means that approximately 14 people out of a 100 who get infected are going to die.

But this is not the whole picture. This is long term. WHO itself has stated that there is no guaranteed immunity. Dramatic changes in terms of lifestyle are going to produce dramatic changes in terms of economics and dramatic changes in terms of economics produce political changes. The geopolitical map of the world will not be the same.

Lockdown: Blamed if you impose it and blamed if you lift it

Lockdown: Blamed if you impose it and blamed if you lift it

Imposed a lockdown was both about health and about politics because it had both health and political repercussions on top of having enormous financial consequences. Politicians are blamed for not imposing a lockdown and politicians are blamed for having imposed a lockdown. At the end of the day, we know that no economy in the world can survive almost total paralysis. If major economies collapse, other economies around the world will collapse because we are interdependent of one another.

This is worse than 1929 and we know what happened as a direct consequence of 1929. World War Two was one of the direct consequences of what happened in Wall Street, New York in 1929.   

According to the League of Nations, the world's population in 1929 was about 1,833 million. In 2020, the world's population is estimated to be 7,800 million. The pressure in terms of having to meet the needs of a population that is more than 3 times bigger than the population of 1929 is gigantic.

The challenge is clearly visible. Economic demobilization at this point time can have dramatic repercussions. We are talking about mass starvation and conflicts of unbelievable proportions.

Left-wing political repression in Uruguay: Senator Guido Manini Rios denounces prosecution carried out with fabricated evidence

Left-wing political repression in Uruguay: Senator Guido Manini Rios denounces prosecution carried out with fabricated evidence

Corona Virus: Context and repercussions

Corona Virus: Context and Repercussions

Corona Virus: What comes after it?

Corona Virus: What comes after it?

We cannot listen to the news without the customary report about the economic consequences of the present Corona Virus crisis. 

Day in, day out, those who know about economics and those who play by ear, they all have something to say about impending doom.

What about if the present crisis changes the way we do things for the better? What if numbers and percentages are seen no more as rulers? What if we start looking at life and human beings as what they are: life and human beings.

There is no point in talking about the number of dead people including those who are dying in care homes if we are not willing to implement necessary changes to ensure that should a similar situation arise in the future we are better prepared to keep people alive.

What if we can work better and more efficiently without being crowded in cars and public transport? What if we save the time we spend travelling around having a more balanced lifestyle? We could produce more, have better lives, and have much a much better economy.

Comments made about how Beijing looked before the Corona Virus crisis and how Beijing looks now during the Corona Virus crisis, about how animals were returning to places taken over by humans beings, made me think. What about making the improvements generated by a tragedy a permanent feature of a new way of life?

Where there is danger, there is opportunity. The opportunity to do things much better.

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Anne Marie Waters fighting for relevance and losing

Introduction:

In the midst of an international crisis generated by the spread of Corona Virus, other battles are being fought. The apparent disappearance of the British National Party from the political arena under what Adam Walker and Clive Jefferson - present Leader and Deputy Leader - defined as "new leadership style", the BNP became a ghost in British politics. This led to the formation of groups like For Britain led by Anne Marie Waters. Her attempt to fill up the void has been shown as no more than sheer opportunism using part of the political agenda of the British National Party and mixing it with contents that never had anything to do with British Nationalism.

More than once, Anne Maria Waters has found herself "in choppy seas", trying and failing to define a coherent agenda. On the one hand, she talks about keeping Britain British. On the other, she has a liberal agenda that goes very much against keeping Britain British. On the one hand, she states that she rejects the ways of the British National Party and of traditional British Nationalism and on the other hand she is surrounded by elements of the BNP that constitute the core of For Britain.

For a while, she had the support of British Nationalists, despite the fact that many of her stances go directly against fundamental values of British Nationalism. Having said that, the publication of a video launching a frontal attack against British Nationalists and using the usual tools used by others to misrepresent British Nationalism, she appears to have shot herself in the foot. Some comentators have indicated that the hatred she has expressed against Islam has more to do with her own sexual preferences than with a genuine attempt to keep Britain British. For Britain seems to be a one man band or, to put it more appropriately, a one woman band.

Essay:

"Nationalists up and down the country were struck with astonishment following publication, Friday April 10th, of a YouTube video by For Britain leader, Anne Marie Waters, attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative.

Questions are now being asked as to who - or what - could have triggered Ms Waters into humiliating herself and her party in a move that further deepens the divide between civic and ethno-nationalists.

To answer the question, we perhaps need to look at events dating back twelve months or so, when certain prominent figures within the Tommy Robinson and For Britain movements widened their reading lists to include works on the Frankfurt School and Holocaust Revisionism. One such notable figure, Shazia Hobbs, was a regular contributor to TR News - a website dedicated to Tommy Robinson, apparently run by staunch Tommy advocate and self-confessed "Nazi Jew", Avi Yemeni, currently residing in Australia. As Shazia's interest and knowledge increased, she published a feature on TR News entitled  "Hypocrisy". As most people know, the Tommy Robinson movement has no problem with any criticism of Islam; less so when the criticism is directed at Judaism. Without explanation, Shazia's article was quietly removed from the website by TR News editors.

Shortly after, Tommy again found himself behind bars. In a disastrous PR move, marking the beginning of the end for the Tommy movement, TR News published a video entitled "How to Burn a Nazi". The video was a brutal, unwarranted attack on Patriotic Alternative leader, Mark Collett, Shazia Hobbs and another former prominent Team Tommy activist, Dionne Møller aka Secret Sources. It's necessary to remind readers here that the video was published using the name of Tommy Robinson whilst Tommy himself was in prison. From then on, support for Tommy Robinson began to fade, which is hardly surprising. Tommy was seen to have stabbed some of his brightest and best elements in the back: elements who are true British patriots, born and bred in this country, unlike Avi of Oz and Brian of Tel Aviv.

At the same time, over the past few months, interest in ethno-nationalism and, in particular, Patriotic Alternative (PA) has increased, notably by way of contributions from a new wave of younger, talented content creators, who understand the plight facing future generations and who are motivated enough to seek and campaign for reasonable solutions. Citing the infamous 14 words, these youngsters, mainly inspired by Mark Collett, PA deputy leader Laura Towler and other prominent figures within PA circles, propose feasible strategies with which to tackle public opinion on the demographic crisis facing the British Isles and the west in general. Making the most out of the COVID19 Lockdown, for example, an army of online Groypers have been brigading suitable political targets. (Check out Natty's calls to LBC's Nick Ferrari and UNWAShED's livestreams on YouTube). Last month, the second ever Patriotic Alternative conference was held just outside London. The event was a huge success, attended by 200 smartly-dressed patriots from all walks of life and of all ages, with the youngest just 15 years of age.

Now, fast forward to Ms Waters' uncanny decision to put out a less vicious but nonetheless similar video to "How to burn a Nazi", attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative. As noted in the recent article on this blog, Ms Waters' and Tommy were - and possibly still are – quite close associates. Both follow the counter-jihad line, shrivelling in horror and squealing like leftists at the slightest mention of one particular ethnic community or of certain aspects of WW2 historiography.

The strategy used by Anne Marie Waters in her video - namely, to defame and smear her political rivals as "racists" who wish to "round up black people" – has backfired spectacularly, as seen by the swift removal of her video shortly after it had been shared on the TR News Telegram channel :
Presumably, someone ordered Avi Yemeni to take the video down. The YouTube original - where comments were originally disabled and then reactivated following complaints - has received a battering, both in the comments section and in the thumbs-up thumbs-down ratio. At the time of writing, there are just 800 likes to 1.6k dislikes.

So, why did Ms Waters choose to shoot herself and her own party in the foot? Was she badly advised by someone in her entourage? At the beginning of the video, filmed Friday morning, she mentions being flooded with messages about Patriotic Alternative and Mark Collett...

Certain sources appear to believe that Ms Waters was shown a photograph posted the previous evening on Facebook, showing Shazia Hobbs together with persecuted singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz in attendance at the recent PA conference.

No doubt that there are spies on Alison Chabloz’s Facebook page who sometimes send information to Hope Not Hate (HNH). Definite proof of this was seen last year when HNH Head of Intel, Matthew Collins, fished several of Alison's "friends only" posts from her timeline and then posted them on Twitter. The social media platform forced Collins to delete. But that is beside the point.

At the same time Ms Waters' published her video, the banner on her YouTube channel was changed. The banner now features a photograph of Ms Waters, also in the company of Shazia, taken at a 2016 demo.










Ms Waters' move provoked this reaction from Shazia:

To complicate matters further, Matthew Collins and the rest of the Hope Not Hate cabal aren't the only ones champing at the bit to have Alison Chabloz once again clamped in irons - for singing songs. Unlike Ms Waters and many other civic and ethno-nationalists, Alison has never been associated with the Tommy Robinson movement. On the contrary, her legal troubles are the direct result of Alison being targeted by people within Team Tommy, and in particular via the dirty deeds of Ambrosine Shitrit from London.

Mrs Shitrit is known to have financially supported Tommy fans, paying travel costs and hotels to ensure large crowds at pro-Tommy demos and court hearings. Indeed, the day Alison Chabloz was convicted, all the news headlines were grabbed... you've guessed it! - by Tommy Robinson getting himself arrested outside Leeds Crown Court. And that's not all: whilst Tommy was stealing media attention up in Leeds, a posse of his close associates, including Jonathan Hoffman and Sharon Klaff, rolled up outside Alison's court case, waving Israeli flags, cheering her conviction and displaying aggressive behaviour towards her supporters.

Who persuaded Tommy that it was a wise idea to go to Leeds that day, in possible breach of a court order..? - A move that did eventually see Tommy back in jail.

Admittedly, there is no evidence of Mrs Shitrit or Hope Note Hate sending the photo of Shazia and Alison at the Patriotic Alternative conference to Ms Waters. There is, however, a third possibility.

Readers will perhaps remember an ongoing Battle of Wills between Alison Chabloz and ex-model, Michele Renouf, which culminated in a series of defamatory articles about Alison, penned by two of Mrs Renouf's closest allies, Richard Edmonds and Peter Rushton. Four articles in total were published, labelling Alison as "a traitor and a saboteur", demanding her "surgical removal from movement circles" and even holding her responsible for the death of Professor Robert Faurisson (who was 89 years old at the time).

Last May, Rushton threatened to sue Alison Chabloz in a remarkable move that ensured he would no longer be able to mention her name without being immediately ridiculed.

Since then, others have carried the torch on behalf of Mrs Renouf, attempting to characterise Alison as a “leftist lover of Islam” whenever the opportunity arises. The schema, like the sockpuppetry, is predictable, as seen in this series of comments published by the same people under two videos, published six months' apart:

Note the comment above by "Jack Doe" (one of the pseudos used by ex-BNP electoral candidate, Julie Lake from Bristol) that Alison Chabloz would be "out of the loop"... It must have come as a nasty shock to learn that Alison Chabloz was welcomed by Mark and Laura into the Patriotic Alternative movement. The news also appears to have left Hope Not Hate speechless, for once. Furthermore, Alison's presence at the Patriotic Alternative conference and her work with the Patriotic Groypers must be absolutely devastating, both for Ambrosine Shitrit and for Michele Renouf.

These people will stop at nothing. Ambrosine Shitrit continues to lie and smear on social media and, worse still, the Rushton-Renouf camp appears to be spreading further damaging rumours that Mark Collett would be responsible for having caused a massive split in the movement. A sure sign of desperation and, of course, highly ironic, coming from those who are in fact responsible for having engineered the split in the first place. They didn't attend the PA conference, and they were not missed in the slightest.

This latest split in the movement is probably the best thing to have happened in British nationalist politics for over a decade. The chaff have sorted themselves out from the wheat, into their own little ghetto,  now further removed from the main stage of British nationalism than even the Team Tommy civ-nats.

We will probably never know who was responsible for tipping Anne Marie Waters over the edge and undermining any slim chance she has left of gaining authority and credibility. Natural justice has been served. Here and now, we as nationalists must focus on the essential and spread the 14 words: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

Source: Nationalist Forum

Shazia Hobbs: I have zero affliation with For Britain

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Shazia Hobbs: I have zero affliation with For Britain

A video released by Anne Marie Waters in the last few hours looks and sounds like a desperate attempt to shore up her power base. 

Unfortunately for Anne Marie Waters, the body of evidence against her is much too big to be able to put things under the carpet.

Writer Shazia Hobbs used to support Tommy Robinson.

Here, Shazia Hobbs speaks at a rally organised in support of Tommy Robinson. On the right of the image, you see none other than Gerard Batten - former UKIP Leader and former MEP. Gerard Batten still supports Tommy Robinson, but the relationship with Shazia Hobbs went sour.

 But things seemed to have gone terribly wrong because Shazia Hobbs speaks her own mind and becaused of it she came under attack and several high profile supporters of both Tommy Robinson and For Britain are walking away and joining Patriotic Alternative. Shazia Hobbs stated: Anne Marie Waters has a cheek to use my picture as her YouTube banner. Where the hell was her support when the 'Burn a Nazi' video was released about me? I have zero affiliation with For Britain and fully support Patriotic Alternative.

Shazia Hobbs speaking at the 2018 For Britain National Conference

The fact that more and more people are walking away from both Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters has been indicated as the fundamental reason why Anne Marie Waters launched an attack against Patriotic Alternative. Anne Marie Waters knows that her best people are leaving her and she didn't have too much support to start with.

Here is another pictures showing Shazia Hobbs and Katie Hopkins

I meet Anne Marie Waters a few months ago at the Merchant of Bishopgate located at Liverpool Street Station in Central London. There I saw a woman complaining about not even being able to organize political meetings and showing herself as target of persecution.

For Britain is almost a one man (one woman) band. Like UKIP and others, they showed themselves to be politically irrelevant. Whenever Anne Marie Waters is asked to be more specific, a sea of contradictions appears.

I estimate that every single negative mention of For Britain is seen as a blessing because it creates the illusion of political existence and relevance.

Anne Marie Waters and Katie Hopkins

What do Anne Marie Waters, Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson have in common? Their visible love affair with Israel. The only problem is that it is yet another example of unrequited love. 

Now, let's look at the picture. Some Jewish operators are behind the media machinery of Tommy Robinson, for example. Unfortunately for all of them, once Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party was massively defeated in a General Election and replaced by Keith Starmer's Labour Party (Keith Starmer is married to Jewess Victoria Alexander and both of their children are being raised in the Jewish faith), who will need operators like Anne Marie Waters, Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson, all of whom have peculiar links with those they say that they are against? 

Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters

This blog has been falsely/misguidedly linked to a political organisation called British National Party. We are not in any way, shape or form linked to such organisation.

Patriotic Alternative responds to Anne Marie Waters

The tragedy of so called British Nationalism is that some of those portraying themselves as British Nationalists are driven by arguments that have little to do with promoting British interests. Confusing arguments born out of desperation in an attempt to be politically meaningful.

In a conversation I had with Anne Marie Waters, the key issue was that meetings organised by Anne Marie Waters and those linked to Anne Marie Waters kept being cancelled or rejected indicating that those who own venues or manage venues don't wish to be associated with Anne Marie Waters.

In politics, perception is critically important. For Britan, has incorporated elements of the British National Party that were associated with the very same ideas that Anne Marie Waters says that she rejects. None other than Julian Leppert was elected Councillor representing the British National Party and now he represents For Britain as Councillor - their only Councillor.

It appears that Anne Marie Waters hasn't done her research properly. In a desperate attempt to build a power base, she has incorporated members of the Far Right that were and are directly linked to the very same things that she talks against. 

Here, Anne Marie Waters appears surrounded by prominent figures of the British National Party, including Eddy Butler, the mastermind of the British National Party electoral success in Barking and Dagenham that got 12 Councillor elected and one of the British National Party stalwarts that got Richard Barnbrook elected as Member of the London Assembly. She might persuade those who are not aware of the political background of her core supporters. I don't think that Anne Marie Waters is a naive individual. I think that she is being disingenous.

The comment made by a well-known political activist was 'I think that she was very badly advised to make a video attacking Mark Collett and Patriotic Alternative'. Mark Collett was also a prominent British National Party member.

Jeffrey Marshall, also a prominent British Party member, posed as a friend of Jewish Communities. Here he was at a Synagogue, wearing a yamaka and taking part in a religious ceremony.   

Most of the core members of For Britain, including the only elected representative (Julian Leppert), have one thing is common. They are all former members of the British National Party. What led Anne Marie Waters to publish a video directly attacking Patriotic Alternative? 

The British National Party is everywhere. It is in For Britain, in Patriotic Alternative and in Britain First as Paul Golding was also a prominent member of the British National Party. Many of those supporting Tommy Robinson - including Tommy Robinson himself - can be traced back to the British National party. In fact, For Britain and several other groups are the direct consequence of the fragmentation of the British National Party that went though a similar process as the National Front from which it derived.

Here you see Tommy Robinson at a British National Party meeting listening to Richard Edmonds. Was Tommy Robinson unaware of the ideas of Richard Edmonds who was a vital link with National Front? I have met Tommy Robinson quite a few times. I don't think that Tommy Robinson was or is a naive individual. He left the BNP and went on to join the English Defense League that is fervently anti-Islam. In 2013, he left the English Defense League, criticized EDL, but took over its anti-Islam platform that he shares with Anne Marie Waters.

In fact, all groups that came out of the British National Party and the British National Party itself share the anti-Islam platform. Fragmentation was not the consequence of ideological differences. Fragmentation was very much the consequence of personalities and internal feuds.

At practically all rallies in support of Tommy Robinson or Anne Marie Waters, you see Israeli flags. This would lead some operators to think that Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters are supporters of Zionists and of the State of Israel. Are they? How much do Jewish Communities actually support Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters?

In the muddy world of British politics, it is difficult to know who stands for what. This is why, regardless of any statements of Anne Marie Waters - as long as much of her power base is directly traceable to the British National Party - her attempts to disassociate herself from certain political platforms will not change public perception. 

Today, Britain is very much focused on the tragedy generated by Corona Virus. Most people don't have the time nor the inclination to engage in profound political analysis and the days in which so many are losing their lives do not seem to be the proper time to discuss certain political issues. When the present health crisis is hopefully over, I believe that Britain will be in many ways a different country.

To rebuild Britain, we will need real politicians working together for the common good. Those existing on the fringes of British politics, driven by personality feuds and empty slogans will be as irrelevant as ever before.

London under Corona Virus

London under Corona Virus

The lonely bagpiper standing on Westminster Bridge, pretty close to the Houses of Parliament and some of the most visited London attractions.

London is in lockdown. Most shops are closed. Amenities like restaurants, theatres, museums, galleries, and casinos are closed. Big companies are suffering the strain of having to close doors to the public and some have already gone into administration.

People are still dying in big numbers and there is even different versions of events indicating that there could be more than one strain of Corona virus going around. The education system is working at minimal levels and only to meet special needs. Only companies providing essential services are still working.

Another angle of the crisis is the fact that things are dire for those most vulnerable and especially those who have little or financial resources to get by. There are huge issues to deal with. How much social and financial damage would the country have suffered when and if the Corona Virus crisis comes to an end.With borrowing and unemployment going up, it is difficult to assess the repercussionms of the lockdown. Will it be a matter of weeks? Months? Years? The consequences will be long term.

Corona Virus: Unprepared to face a different kind of enemy

Corona Virus: Unprepared to face a different kind of enemy

In the Twentieth Century, there were all kinds of wars that had one thing in common - they were all fought with some kind of mechanical devices.

This is why Armies are now about tanks, artillery, airplanes, naval ships, rockets, bombs, nuclear devices. We are even preparing for war outside the Earth atmosphere.

With all the arsenal that could wipe out Humanity, we are at the mercy of microbes against which we have very little to protect ourselves. The invisible enemies have stealth capacity and can attack with short notice, unpredictably, across national borders.

We heard about chemical weapons and biological weapons. People have fantasized about using biological weapons. If anything, Corona Virus should show all those who have ever considered using biological weapons that biological weapons with turn against not just against potential victims but also against those who use biological weapons. Viruses have no national allegiances. Viruses will kind anybody regardless of which side of the divide he or she is on.

Some politicians talk about a new Cold War against China. A whole bunch of idiots driven to use old failed recipes. This is not about China. This is not about USA or the Western World. This is about Humanity as a whole for everybody is being affected by a biological enemy. This is the alien invader of Independence Day and we are all in this together to defeat a merciless enemy called Corona Virus.