Does Mike Pence understand what he is proposing when he talks about Americans being sent to die in Ukraine?

 

As seasoned American politician and as former Vice President of the USA, Mike Pence should understand the messages that he is sending to the American public and to the world.

Talking about American ready to die in Ukraine, he is not just talking about Americans. He is inviting the World to face World War Three and the use of nuclear weapons that could well fall on American soil transforming Washington, New York and other major cities into modern copies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Fighting in Iraq and in Afghanistan, it was all about Americans and few other participating countries that also had losses. Europe is a completely different cup of tea. If any Americans get directly involved in the fighting, all NATO countries will be involved and this precisely because an issue of numbers will involved Nuclear Weapons. 

We understand that Mike Pence is biding to become the next Republican Presidential Candidate but if he is showing such careless approach in political speeches made before he even becomes a candidate then what kind of President could he possibly be when he has the finger on the nuclear button. 

Americans should listen very carefully to what those who stand to fight for the nomination of Presidential Candidates and ultimately for the Presidency are actually saying. His words show total disregard for the certain risks of getting NATO directly involved in the conflict.

Many have criticized the Organisation of the United Nations and in fact the United States of America has disregarded the Organization of the United Nations more than once and has carried out military adventures without the approval of the Organization of the United Nations. But even taken such record into account, any such military adventures will terminate the Organisation of the United Nations. We are talking about Permanent Members of the Security Council of the Organization of the United Nations taking sides against each other. World War One signal the end of the League of Nations. World War Three will signal the end of the Organization of the United Nations.

One could say that if there was World War Three, the world would no longer need any such kind of organisation as the world as we know it today will no longer exist. 

Democrats stabbed USA in the back: Taliban wins, NATO is on the run and America kneels down in front of Taliban

 

America has surrendered. America has kneeled down and this is becoming a habit.

No more the proud nation of the Star spangled banner.

Taliban is now in command and BLM is destroying American culture from within the USA. 

Iraq was a shambles. Afghanistan is a shambles that surpasses defeat in Vietnam. 

The world of George S Patton depicted in the movie Patton sound hollow, meaningless, void of any historical realism.

American has been been stabbed in the back by a Democratic Party that has turned its back on America to promote every single anti-American cause that they can find.

Welcome to the new USA, a weaker nation that is now leaving the way wide open for China to take over to become the one and only world power.

Politics: Pretending that conflict doesn't exist doesn't avoid conflict

Politics: Pretending that conflict doesn't exist doesn't avoid conflict

Some in the United Kingdom complain saying that one of the BBC flagship programmes - Question Time - has become too beligerant, that those taking part in it are not the happy chappies they used to be and that they are at each other's throats even after the cameras and microphones are switched off.

When issues matter people who care become beligerant. As Americans become beligerant when it comes to the right to bear arms. Do they become beligerant? Of course they do. Rights are fought for.

Isn't this something that marks the history of any nation across the world? The expression is: standing up for your rights. Did Britain award the colonies in America the right to vote, the decision power they were asking for because they were paying taxes to the British Crown without representation? Conflict is often unavoidable.

The upper lip, the time to endure without reacting, is on its way out. People become plainly open about their views. They say that in Britain people are learning to litigate, somehow following the example of the United States of America. Those accustomed to pretend that nothing is happening are alarmed when somebody stands up and airs his or her views openly. The time to bow is over.   

When Prince Harry Windsor says "I have had enough", the ground trembles. Those who strive to maintain the status quo are shocked. When reverence feels and sounds like subservience, the time for reverence is over and this happens over and over again and the fact that it happens is a healthy feature of social development.

But in Britain, at several levels, including Universitary education, many are not ready for plain talking. They are literally afraid of plain talking. British universities used to be a lighthouse of free thinking. Nowadays, they are bastions of political correctness and repression. The education system controlled by left-wing ideologues promotes a totalitarian approach. Having said that, when such approach goes not only against true democratic values but also against national interest there is no room for complaisancy. 

Now is the time for plain talking to cleanse Britain of negative structures and negative tendencies. The sooner we call apples apples and oranges oranges the better. Just across the pond, in the USA, the attempt by the Democrats to change the outcome of a Presidential Election will lead to a backlash as the attempt by a Remain Parliament led to a backlash in the United Kingdom and this is very much the consequence of democratic principles. When the Democrats as elected work against the electors, the electors rebel and get rid of the elected.

Regardless of who has the balance of power in the House of Representatives, ignoring the wishes of the American people the Democrats are digging up their own political graves. The Democrats are abusing power to try and change the outome of an election. The vote in the House of Representatives was in itself proof that the attempt to impeach President Trump is no more than a Democrat coup attempt. It was by no means a bypartisan vote.

President Trump's Impeachment: Democrats plot against democracy in the USA

President Trump's Impeachment: Democrats plot against democracy in the USA

Since the days when the Democratic Party got John Kennedy elected thanks to the Mafia, there hadn't been any attempt as shameful as the present attempt to undermine democracy in the USA. The House of Representatives with only the votes of Democrats approved sending two impeachment articles to the Senate. Those willing to vote in 2020 US Elections should remember the plotters and punish them as they very much deserve to be punished for trying to overturn the outcome of a Presidential Election.

There were no criminal charges whatsoever because no crime has been committed by the President of the United States of America and therefore there was no cross party support for what is nothing more than an attempted coup d'état in the Uunited States of America.

This is as shameful as it is dangerous for political stability. You might agree or disagree with the policies implemented by the American President, but there is legal justification whatsoever to try and overthrow an American President that has committed no crime.

Is somebody in the Democratic Party launching pretend attacks to get votes in Mid-Term Elections?

Democrats using false attacks to boots their electoral chances?

From false accusations about sexual abuse to distortion and fabrication implicating prostitutes, Democrats have used practically every tool to revive their electoral chances. They even have public figures openly inciting violence against President Trump and President Trump's supporters.

Looking at the record of attacks against Democratic politicians - John Kennedy was shot. Robert Kennedy was shot - it seems unlikely that somebody actually willing and wanting to cause lethal damage would use improvised devices that don't explode nor cause any damage. The said devices are not only sent to politicians but also to well-known personalities aka celebrities that have been critical against President Trump. Therefore, this looks very much like a false flag, a well organised publicity campaign. If the Democratic Party has to resort to such underhanded and infantile tactics to win votes, the Democratic Party is not fit for purpose.

The big item in the news is a march of people trying to enter the United States of America illegally. Who would you trust when the time comes to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the USA? Would you trust Democratic politicians to prevent an invasion? The record of the Democratic Party in recent years will show that they would leave the gates wide open. Where are the said illegal immigrants coming from? They have come across Central America and will try and enter the USA via Mexico, a country that has entire areas that are run by Drug Cartels that not only deal with drugs but also exploit people form as far as India that pay vast amounts of money to be trafficked illegally to the USA. Which party has openly opposed  a boost of US border controls? The Democratic Party. "Don't build that Wall, President Trump. Allow drug-traffickers and illegal immigrants to enter the USA freely and without any worries".

    

Texas getting ready to defend US borders

TEXAS GETTING READY

Texas is gearing up to defend our own border if necessary.

Each State has the right to do that individually with the federal government or own their own if the federal government can't or won't. We have militia/Minutemen and Texas National Guard under the authority of the Governor already there.

The President is sending federal troops to individual border States. Texas will defend our border and I assume other border States will do the same except California who, as a State, has an open border policy. I believe the President will and may already have send national troops to California to keep these invaders out of the US. Don't worry about Texas, they won't get in here. We'll defend with deadly force if need be.

However, if the national military doesn't deal with California, they could get in there, then be bussed all over the USA from California. That's the real problem. The governments of the invaders are being dealt with economically. Trump has cut off all aid to them. Venezuela is the country that is paying for these invaders.

I'm sure Venezuela is being given the money to use by people like Soros and the Clintons. It's all meant to cause problems for our midterm elections. The bad guy are losing and they can't cheat their way into office any more. They are pulling out all the stops to keep from losing what's left of their power during this election. Those bombs are a false flag, a set up to try to make it look like they are victims of attacks/threats from Republicans, specifically Donald Trump supporters.

They hope that will make people vote for democrats. It won't work. This is a war. They are losing badly and are terrified their crimes and evil will be exposed and they will end up in jail or worse. They should be scared. We have to be vigilant because other nations are involved with the corrupt here and they don't want to be exposed to their people. This goes very deep and very wide. Britain is deeply involved with our corrupt/evil people here. They will answer for their part in all of this as well.

Holli Snider-Feeley

Kathy Griffin: In a country in which there is a history of Presidents killed, she should be in jail

Kathy Griffin

Kathy Griffin: In a country in which there is a history of Presidents killed, she should be in jail.

We welcome the decision of CNN to fire Kathy Griffin. It was the right thing to do to get rid of an individual that seems to have lost the plot by posing in a picture that constitutes incitement to kill an American President.

She accuses others and poses as a victim when she is fully responsible for what she did. The picture would not have been published if she had not allowed herself to be photographed. She even made fun of it all while the picture was being taken. Nobody broke her. She broke herself by engaging in an act that constitutes incitement to murder.

Her act was condemned by both Republicans and Democrats. Therefore, she cannot claim that there is a political angle to the story. She should acting in a humble manner and thank the authorities for not taking her into custody to be prosecuted and jailed for what she did.