President Obama: Nobel Prize for peace in Palestine? What peace in Palestine?

President Obama: Nobel Prize for peace in Palestine? What peace in Palestine?

As we follow what has been happening in Palestine and in the Middle East in general, we ask the question again: what was the Nobel Prize for Barak Obama about? What has fundamentally changed in the situation being faced by Israelis and Palestinians? What long term beneficial arrangement has been reached?

But lets also look at other issues and one of such issues is Libya and what happened in Libya during President Obama's administration with Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. The Arab Spring turned into the Arab Nightmare that became Europe's nightmare. The US Administration created refugees and Europe had to deal with the refugees and/or economic migrants (whichever title you want to give to the massive number of people who were displaced or simply decided to move out of their own countries in search for the Christian Paradise that many are trying to turn into a Muslim Dominion.

This is not only about the wisdom of military interventions. It is about the consequences of disastrous US Foreign Policies under a Democratic Administration. USA is far away from Africa, Middle East and Asia Minor, but it is Europe the one that has to deal with the consequences of disastrous US Foreign Policies.

Did President Obama deal with North Korea? No. It was necessary to wait for President Trump to deal with North Korea and he didn't do it with weapons. President Trump did it with words, talking to people and seeking an understanding. There are no more North Korea missiles flying over neighbouring countries. No more talk about missile attacks against the USA. There is a path towards peace between two countries in the Korean Peninsula. No more resources invested in wasteful naval military exercises seen as a threat and justification for nuclear developments. Is there any talk about giving President Trump a Nobel Prize? 

When President Trump talks about immigration, he refers to legal immigration. Is it wrong to say that anybody coming to the USA must have proper documentation? The Democratic Party supports Illegal Immigration. How can Democratic support for Illegal Immigration be compatible with National Security?

The leaders of the Democratic Party are against defending the USA faced with Illegal Immigration and are willing to bring the entire state administration to a halt so that they can get their way. With this behaviour, the Democratic Party doesn't stand for American Values and doesn't stand for US National Security either. Legal means legal. I wouldn't dream about travelling to the USA without proper documentation. 

Texas getting ready to defend US borders

TEXAS GETTING READY

Texas is gearing up to defend our own border if necessary.

Each State has the right to do that individually with the federal government or own their own if the federal government can't or won't. We have militia/Minutemen and Texas National Guard under the authority of the Governor already there.

The President is sending federal troops to individual border States. Texas will defend our border and I assume other border States will do the same except California who, as a State, has an open border policy. I believe the President will and may already have send national troops to California to keep these invaders out of the US. Don't worry about Texas, they won't get in here. We'll defend with deadly force if need be.

However, if the national military doesn't deal with California, they could get in there, then be bussed all over the USA from California. That's the real problem. The governments of the invaders are being dealt with economically. Trump has cut off all aid to them. Venezuela is the country that is paying for these invaders.

I'm sure Venezuela is being given the money to use by people like Soros and the Clintons. It's all meant to cause problems for our midterm elections. The bad guy are losing and they can't cheat their way into office any more. They are pulling out all the stops to keep from losing what's left of their power during this election. Those bombs are a false flag, a set up to try to make it look like they are victims of attacks/threats from Republicans, specifically Donald Trump supporters.

They hope that will make people vote for democrats. It won't work. This is a war. They are losing badly and are terrified their crimes and evil will be exposed and they will end up in jail or worse. They should be scared. We have to be vigilant because other nations are involved with the corrupt here and they don't want to be exposed to their people. This goes very deep and very wide. Britain is deeply involved with our corrupt/evil people here. They will answer for their part in all of this as well.

Holli Snider-Feeley

Hillary Clinton collapses and is unable to walk during remembrance of 9/11

Hillary Clinton had to be carried away during remembrance of September 11th 2001, after she collapsed and was unable to walk.

Hillary Clinton: Who cares about the little people?

Of black-eyes and disdain for ordinary folk.

The US Secret Service agent who first raised the alert bout Monica Lewinsky's access to the White is about to public a book claiming Hillary Clinton "lacks the integrity and temperament" to serve as President.

Hillary Clinton is described as 'volcanic, impulsive, enabled y sycophants, and disdainful of the rules set for everyone else."

Gary Byrne who was first hand weakness of events happening in the White House, including the lack of sexual relationships between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky, was also witnessed of acts of violence involving Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and reveals that he had to dispose of physical evidence regarding sexual activities in the White House.

In another set of events, Hillary Clinton talks about Donald Trump's lack of acumen regarding Foreign Affairs but she conveniently excluded from her comments the fact that an American Ambassador to Egypt and US diplomatic personnel lost their lives because of her incompetence that allowed sending diplomatic staff to a war zone.

The rosy picture used to describe the Arab Spring turned out to be a massacre of US diplomatic staff. I guess collecting coffins and body bags is well within the range of experience of Hillary Clinton that presents herself as a warmonger inclined to wage Nuclear War.

She seems to be worried about others having control over nuclear buttons. Or is it that she wants to be the one to start a Nuclear War?

Well, we are talking about personalities and attitudes that seem to be the rule rather than the exception. Here we have a black US President Barak Obama that is not black, but mixed race, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize but goes around waging wars or promoting new wars, who talks about elimination of Nuclear Weapons (provided the Nuclear Weapons eliminated are not the ones US has got). They all seem cut out of the same cloth with demagogy and outright lies. Ah, by the way, if you are trying to contact Hillary Clinton using her official email address, please don't . Use her private email address just in case it is about something the American people should know nothing about.

Donald Trump (business man) or Hillary Clinton (career politician)?

Donald Trump makes the wind blow and Hillary Clinton goes where the wind takes her. In times of uncertainty, Donald Trump is his own man while Hillary Clinton is the Arms Lobby Puppet.

Given the record in terms of Foreign Policies, Hillary Clinton is the Forerunner of War and I am afraid that under Hillary Clinton the warning issued by a former NATO Commander will become a tangible reality with a military confrontation in Europe that will surpass what World War Two.
Think about 1962 and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The USA and the Soviet Union almost came to blows because of a few missiles stationed in Cuba. Today, the USA and NATO have a military deployment in Eastern Europe, across the borders of the Russian Federation, that has greater firepower than the German Wehrmacht had right before the June 22, 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union in what was called Operation Barbarossa (Unternehmen Barbarrosa).

The Russian Federation has shown extraordinary patience but not everybody in the Russian Federation is so patient. The Communist Party - the second largest political force in the Russian Federation - has called for retaliation against those who are threatening the Russian Federation.

Having Hillary Clinton at the helm war in Europe is not a subject for philosophical debate but a disastrous certainty.

The German Wehrmacht is now growing up in numbers and fire power - supposedly as a response to a request by the USA under President Barak Obama - within the NATO framework. The US military attitude to keep Britain within the EU is very much part of the strategy of involving the EU in war against the Russian Federation. Either because of NATO links or EU links, all countries will be forced by the USA to go to war in Europe.

In World War Two, the number of dead reportedly reached 60 million. In World War Three, the whole of the European Continent would be wiped out and for millions of years the European Continent will be uninhabitable given extremely high radioactive pollution.