Mr. President, it is happening under your administration so you cannot blame somebody else

 

Mr President, it is happening under your Administration. You are the Commander in Chief and the buck stops with you because you made, once again, the wrong call.

You had the power to make things differently and you deliberately said that it was your decission, a decission that you took believing that it was the right decision and as consequence of the United States of America will be, once again, a direct target.

Don't go around blaming others for a decision that you made, because blaming others for what you did makes you look even more foolish and more incompetent. You have thrown away the lives of American citizens and of Afghani citizens. American will be killed and Afghanis will be killed because of what you decided.

You have should have known better. Chasing the culprits of atrocities in Afghanistan? You have them Afghanistan. You created the environment for the culprits to do what they have done and for what they will do in the future not just in the USA, but elsewhere in the world including Europe. 

They will use your decision as a propaganda tool to carry on committing atrocities. You have given them the weapons on a silver plate. You have dishonoured your own office. You have failed to protect the security of the USA and turned the USA into a laughing stock. So you want to chase the culprits? What was your duty from the very beginning?

Manchester attack was a masterpiece

Manchester attack was a masterpiece

The terrorist attack in Manchester was carefully planned and a true masterpiece. To begin with the choice of venue, the occasion and the political background - during a General Election Campaign - everything was done for maximum effect, ensuring that there would be massive repercussions and international mass media coverage.

Whoever organised it is a true genius and we should give him, her, them credit for that. It was a despicable murderous attack but it was carried out with absolute efficiency. We shouldn't underestimate the people we are standing against. They have the brainpower to organise this kinds of attacks for maximum effect.

It was a low-cost operation, requiring not so much technical expertise and requiring limited manpower that minimised loss of human resources, therefore making it practicably undetectable. The Security Services due to lack of manpower usually focus on operations requiring big amounts of money, technical expertise and manpower because this is what usually allows early detection. They Security Services are not equipped to deal with operations like the Manchester operation.

Islamic State quickly make sure that it quickly capitalise on the political repercussions and it must have been a huge morale boost for its embattled troops in Iraq and in Syria.

These people are not cowards, they are not crazy and they are extremely intelligent. They know exactly what they are doing. The aftermath of the Manchester attack and the fact that alert levels have now been raised to Critical with the deployment of the army is certainly a huge success for Islamic State.

Syria IS Bombing

Motion to bomb Islamic State headquarters and others installations operated by Islamic State in Syria

I went yesterday to the House of Commons to listen with intent and in situ to all the arguments presented on the Syrian issue.

66 Labour MPs out of 231 Labour MPs supported the government motion - this means in practical terms that the vast majority of Labour MPs supported Jeremy Corbyn's position against bombing Syria. So all the talk by the mass media about a rebellion against Jeremy Corbyn is utter and absolute rubbish.   

1)    The Conservatives presented the case not as war on Syria but as an extension of military operations presently carried out in Iraq despite the fact that crossing into Syria will effectively mean entering into another country without the express authorization of the Syrian government.

2)    In Iraq, air attacks are carried out in cooperation with Iraqi ground forces. In Syria, air attacks will be carried out mainly in Raqqa (a town that is reportedly being used as headquarters by  Islamic State in order to carry operations in Syria and elsewhere).

3)    The motion presented in the House of Commons makes no mention of British ground forces being involved in Syria and it leaves open the question about what kind of effectiveness bombing operations will have without the involvement of troops on the ground.

4)    Trying to deflect the issue of not having British ground forces, or EU ground forces or NATO ground forces ore regional forces from neighbouring countries, the Conservatives gave a figure that was constantly changing mentioning groups that are already fighting in Iraq against both the Syrian government, against Islamic States and against each other (40,000, 50,000, 70,000) and that therefore lack any kind of coordination.

5)    The issue of Turkey and of Saudi Arabia supporting Islamic State was brought up several times and the question about who is supporting Islamic State was insistently made without having any formal reply from the Government that put forward the motion.

Karl Hohenstauffen

Turkey supports Islamic State

Now Turkish President Erdogan said in 1997: "The Mosques are our Barracks, the Domes our Helmets, the Minarets our  Bayonets and the Faithful our Soldiers".

This is the man in charge in Turkey that is attacking Syrian Kurds and Iraqi Kurds who are fighting against Islamic State.

Turkey is a de-facto Terrorist State, a small detail that Frau Angela Merkel, German Chancellor (still), and others choose to ignore.

If Europe makes pacts with Terrorists, Europe will be hit over and over again by Terrorism. Let us remember that those who carried out the attacks in Paris were supported by Turkey because President Erdogan is very much one of them.

Never mind if Saddam Hussein gassed Kurds in Iraq. Erdogan is killing Kurds in Turkey, in Iraq and in Syria and today added another lamentable chapter to his record: he shot down a Russian plane in an unprovoked attack and is also responsible for the killing not only of the pilots but also of those who came to rescue the pilots.

We know they are dangerous. Why are they still in Britain?

Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammad

We know they are dangerous. We know what they preach. Why are they still in Britain?

If we are going to war, the laws of war apply: Internment camps, concentration camps and deportation. We cannot ask European soldiers to die in the Middle East and Asia Minor while people like this benefit from all the comforts Western Civilization can offer.

We know what Islam is about and how it has led to all kinds of atrocities against those Muslims see as vulnerable. We see the images coming from the Middle East, Asia Minor and Africa. We see the images in Rotherham and in other British cities.

Primer Minister David Cameron, if you are serious about tackling extremism, get rid of the Islamic crap that infests British cities.

ISIL is no terrorist organization. It looks and sounds like a professional army

ISIL is far from being a terrorist organization. It looks and sounds like a professional army with Iraqi officers and American armament.

David Cameron, as usual, is acting as an American poodle and telling whatever he is told that he has to say but this could be his greatest miscalculation.

The fact that high caliber people joined ISIL not just a foot soldiers but as high ranking officers tells a completely different story. While AlQaeda was seen merely as an idea, ISIL is the real thing. What ISIL has proven is that it can do what AlQaeda could only dream about.

Britain must brace itself for attacks in the British Homeland. We are dealing with very well organized and very capable individuals, many of whom have inside and very precise knowledge of British weaknesses. Instead of blowing up trains and buses, these people could target nuclear installations and vital communication links in the United Kingdom. Many of them were born in the United Kingdom, have link within the United Kingdom and have first hand knowledge of vital facilities.

When they talk about 'integrating Muslims in the UK', they are talking about allowing in a Trojan Horse with infiltration in every core organization of the United Kingdom, from top to bottom.