Who has done it? Once again, the BBC is being economic with the truth. This is what you are paying for. Another Jimmy Savile scenario? To have paid 35,000 Pound for illicit pictures, the said presenter must be on a high scale salary that, as it is the case, it is paid with TV License. We can start by taking some names off the list and adding some more that have not been included. The public broadcaster has once again been the news instead of reporting the news and, as it has been noted, the BBC is more often than not making news instead of reporting news.Talking about setting up high standards, openness should be a number one priority.
No comments:
Post a Comment