“Did you know that your taxes are supporting loans going to
Argentina? As President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner continues to make waves
over the sovereignty of the Falklands, the British Government continues to vote
through billions of pounds in international aid to her country, primarily
through the World Bank and the EU. According to a poll by ComRes, of those few
British adults who are aware of such expenditure, barely 6 per cent support it.
Barack Obama’s administration certainly isn’t in favour of
such action. It has started voting against loans to Argentina from
international financial institutions, and is looking for allies in its tough
stance. Britain should be first in line.
While I strongly support foreign assistance – and Britain’s
determination to meet the UN agreement on development aid is an example to the
world – such funds need to be focused on eliminating poverty and conflict, not
fattening government wallets in a G20 country that refuses to meet its global
obligations.
Argentina, after all, is acting with scant regard for the
international community. Over the past decade it has pursued a deliberate
strategy of playing games with financial markets. Its default on £51 billion of
debt in 2001 turned it into a financial pariah, a status that was not enhanced
by two subsequent unilateral debt restructurings. To this day, Argentina
remains shut out of the world’s capital markets. To make matters worse, it also
nationalised private pension funds, thereby providing itself with a captive domestic
market into which it could sell its debt.
The government has since been sued by creditors around the
world as they try to force Argentina to honour its obligations. In the Southern
District Court of New York alone, there have been more than 170 bondholder
lawsuits, resulting in more than 100 judgments. Today, Argentina still owes
more than £15 billion in old debts ranging from Paris Club loans, to
bondholders, and to foreign investors holding arbitral awards from the
International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). In each
case, Argentina has refused to play by the rules. It has demanded a Paris Club
restructuring without the mandatory IMF monitoring, it has ignored New York
court judgments, and it has insisted, in blatant disregard of its treaty
obligations under ICSID, that arbitral awards be brought to Argentina for
“approval” by its own courts.”
President Cristina Fernandez, like her
illustrious colleague General Leopoldo Fortunato Galtieri did in 1982, is
trying to make the world forget that her country does not pay its debts, in
spite of having the money reserves to do so. How does she do it? By re-igniting
an old conflict that, by the way, Argentina lost in the most infamous way in
1982 when Argentina launched an illegal invasion using conscripts as cannon
fodder. There you are. So, did you want to
know why they are talking about it again?
I gave you the answer. Another brilliant example of the most depraved
hypocrisy.
No comments:
Post a Comment