Black communities in Britain are waking up and realising that the Labour Party does not support their interests. The Black newspaper The Voice reported that Southwark Councillor Althea Smith claimed the she was deselected for speaking her mind and indicated that 'The Labour Party knows they always get the black vote so they do not do anything for us.
The Voice also publishes comments of a Labour Activist who said: "When I joined the party, I thought they were a good opposition to the Tories but now my opinion has changed. They can't represent working class people, many of whom are black. The party is so far removed, I don't think they have the comprehension it requires to understand they are taking votes for granted".
Labour's Grassroot Activists say that the Labour Party only wants foot soldiers and this confirms what the British National Party has been saying proving that Black Communities have been fooled by the Labour Apparatchiks who are using them as Toilet Paper.
Perhaps a reminder of Labour attitudes towards the Black Communities is the fact that a reported Police Operation against Stephen Lawrence's family took place under Home Secretary Jack Straw MP.
Tuesday, 30 July 2013
Friday, 26 July 2013
I am one of the harshest critics of the British National Party and also one of its staunchest supporters
I am one of the harshest critics of the British National Party and also one of its staunchest supporters
If we had questioned more and we had criticized more, our organization could have been stronger and we could have avoided many of the pitfalls that led to a debacle that almost sunk the organization. Our meetings were organized in a such a manner that true debate was practically impossible.
Each meeting was divided in two parts and the outcome of each meeting was almost predictable. There were usually two speakers - one during each segment and before a interval there used to a be a collection and a few questions were asked. There were no real debates.
Nowadays, at least in the London Region - I cannot refer to what happens in other regions of the country - there is more debate and I very much prefer sessions with less speeches and more interaction between members.
Tribes have chiefs. Political parties have members that debate with other members. There will always be differences of opinion, there will always be arguments, but in the end differences of opinion and arguments is what democracy is all about.
For many years I criticized what I perceived to be a vertical approach that stifled British National Party branches. Subservience is weakness. For many years we wasted valuable resources that could have transformed British National Party branches into debating forums to promote better activists, better representatives and better candidates.
If we had questioned more and we had criticized more, our organization could have been stronger and we could have avoided many of the pitfalls that led to a debacle that almost sunk the organization. Our meetings were organized in a such a manner that true debate was practically impossible.
Each meeting was divided in two parts and the outcome of each meeting was almost predictable. There were usually two speakers - one during each segment and before a interval there used to a be a collection and a few questions were asked. There were no real debates.
Nowadays, at least in the London Region - I cannot refer to what happens in other regions of the country - there is more debate and I very much prefer sessions with less speeches and more interaction between members.
Tribes have chiefs. Political parties have members that debate with other members. There will always be differences of opinion, there will always be arguments, but in the end differences of opinion and arguments is what democracy is all about.
If we say that we are against centralization, we must be consistent
The British National Party says that concentration of power in the European Union is wrong because concentration of power goes against the rights of independent countries. The same criteria must therefore apply to the running of the British National Party avoiding centralization and allowing each region to run its own affairs for the common good. Each region maintains its independence without interfering in the affairs of other regions while working towards common aims.
Instead of having a vertical approach, we have a horizontal approach. We support each other without imposing our will on others or pressuring others to accept interference. Most regions or all the regions of the British National Party are run by volunteers who invest their time and resources to keep the British National Party alive.
Nationalism is not about imposing our views on others. We have our own views and we respect the views of others. Undue interference leads to conflict situations that negatively affects morale.
Instead of having a vertical approach, we have a horizontal approach. We support each other without imposing our will on others or pressuring others to accept interference. Most regions or all the regions of the British National Party are run by volunteers who invest their time and resources to keep the British National Party alive.
Nationalism is not about imposing our views on others. We have our own views and we respect the views of others. Undue interference leads to conflict situations that negatively affects morale.
Thursday, 25 July 2013
The word is Compassion
When we hear about elderly patients being neglected, about
children being mistreated, the word that comes to mind is compassion or the
lack of it in an opulent country.
We are constantly told about horrific situations affecting other countries but we more often than not fail to see horrific situations happening all around us.
The time is long overdue to start looking after our own people. The time is long overdue to curb corruption that affects vital services in the United Kingdom.
We are constantly told about horrific situations affecting other countries but we more often than not fail to see horrific situations happening all around us.
The time is long overdue to start looking after our own people. The time is long overdue to curb corruption that affects vital services in the United Kingdom.
Labour Councillor in deep water for using Twitter to make comments about BNP
The events involving a Labour Councillor in Salford are now vox populi. Using Twitter to make comments, a Labour Politician referred to the British National Party in a way that has been questioned by the authorities and a legal precedent could be established regarding the way politicians refer to rival political parties during elections.
Remarks made by Margaret Hodge during the 2010 General Election should have been investigated and she should have been made accountable for her remarks that categorize rival politicians as criminals ready to throw people into the sea.
Royal Family or just Family?
While Prime Minister David Cameron has vowed to promote same sex marriages across the World, the British public is still very much focused on the traditional family when it celebrates the arrival of a new member of the British Royal Family.
There is something extremely odd about the attitudes of so called mainstream politicians like David Cameron and the mix of political views with unconventional sexuality looks increasingly bizarre.
After all, it is not all about Europe when it comes to differentiate the present Conservative Party from the United Kingdom Independence Party. UKIP sticks to traditional family values while the Conservative Party is dangerously walking away from family values.
There is something extremely odd about the attitudes of so called mainstream politicians like David Cameron and the mix of political views with unconventional sexuality looks increasingly bizarre.
After all, it is not all about Europe when it comes to differentiate the present Conservative Party from the United Kingdom Independence Party. UKIP sticks to traditional family values while the Conservative Party is dangerously walking away from family values.
Friday, 19 July 2013
Rommel and von Stauffenberg tried to get rid of Hitler because Hitler was losing the War.
Rommel and von Stauffenberg: Distorted history
![]() |
| Klaus von Stauffenberg |
| Erwin Rommel |
History has been written and rewritten. Erwin Rommel and Klaus von Stauffenberg tried to kill Adolf Hitler because Adolf Hitler was losing the war. This is the real picture and not the romanticised version told by the Allies and the media.
The German fighters of the Afrika Korps were not great fans of Western Democracy. They wanted Germany to win the war and they wanted a National Socialist Europe, the kind of National Socialism inspired by the National Socialist Party of the German Workers that Adolf Hitler had forgotten about.
Getting to know the German way of thinking, one undertands that defeat was never an option that could be easily accepted. The plotters of 1944 did not want Democracy. They wanted to get rid of Adolf Hitler because in their minds if the way had been conducted by German Generals they would have had a better chance of winning the war.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




