Monday, 8 April 2013

Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher died

Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher died

Margaret Thatcher
I have been reading messages posted across the Internet about Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s death and I have to write about my reaction regarding the passing of a political leader of the stature of Margaret Thatcher.

It goes without saying that Margaret Thatcher was a controversial figure in British politics and not only in British politics but in the entire world. What characterized Margaret Thatcher was the fact both friends and foes knew where she stood. You could like or dislike her political views and her policies, but you always knew what Margaret Thatcher was about.

Margaret Thatcher left 10 Downing Street without losing a General Election, simply because some in the Conservative Party panicked because they lacked the required moral stamina to stick to principles.

A few days ago, the country remembered the 1982 Argentine invasion of the Falkland Islands and people should forever remember that when others like Kenneth Clarke decided to surrender to the Military Junta headed by General Leopoldo Fortunato Galtieri, Margaret Thatcher stood firm faced with adversity. Because of Margaret Thatcher, the Falkland Islands were recovered and the Military Junta in Argentina was defeated, events that made possible the return of democratic regimes across Latin America.

I can criticize the privatisation policies of the Conservative Party under Margaret Thatcher; I can criticize many of the failures of the Conservative Party, but I stand in admiration of a woman that reached the pinnacle of British politics. When many will have forgotten the John Majors, the Heseltines and the Clarkes, people will still remember British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

Many, inside the British National Party and outside the British National Party, might disagree with my personal views and will disagree with my personal views but I will stand up and be counted and say what I think. 


Sunday, 7 April 2013

Jonathan Aitken: Chris Huhne is enjoying life in prison

Jonathan Aitken: Chris Huhne is enjoying life in prison

Chris Huhne
Jonathan Aitken, the former Conservative Minister and former inmate, reported that Chris Huhne, the former Lib Dem Minister and now inmate, is delighted to be in jail and that Mr Huhne is very much enjoying life in prison.

If what Jonathan Aitken says is a true account, perhaps all members of Parliament should spend some time in jail and if in the end it proves to be such a pleasurable experience they should think about staying in jail permanently.

Chris Huhne is known to have left his heterosexual wife and mother of his children to take a bisexual woman as his new partner. Perhaps Chris Huhne has decided to continue his journey of personal enrichment by having new experiences in prison. Perhaps when he comes out he might tells about such lively times.

Buddhists and Muslims at War – violence spreads into other countries

Buddhists and Muslims at War – violence spreads into other countries

Violence is spreading as Buddhists and Muslims that clashed in Myanmar are now at war in Indonesia.

On Friday, Rioters using wooden sticks, knives and iron bars confronted each other in Sumatra in what was seen as an extension of violent events that are taking place in Bangladesh and in Myanmar.

UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, called on Indonesian authorities to prevent more bloodshed.

An estimated 800,000 Rohingyas live in Myanmar but are officially stateless. The Myanmar government refuses to award them citizenship, regarding them as illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, and Bangladesh does not recognise them as citizens either.

The irony and the real tragedy in this series of events is that, as indicated in the preceding paragraph, Rohingya Muslims are rejected by Bangladesh, a country that has a Muslim majority.

So it is a bit hypocritical for Muslim countries and Muslim comunity leaders to go around talking about 'Muslim Brothers'.

More houses for people that need them and the Labour Party are a contradiction in terms

More houses for people that need them and the Labour Party are a contradiction in terms


John Cruddas MP - Labour Party

John Cruddas is a favourite child of the Labour Party, like many other Labour politicians, says one thing and does another. I suppose that when so many people don’t have a place that they can home, a Labour politician should not have three places called home. The Daily Mail tells us that apart from having two homes, John Cruddas also has a home in Ireland.

The Labour administration enjoyed very much the housing prices boom when a home that was worth £90,000 suddenly was being sold at £450,000. They kept telling ordinary people that now they were rich because their homes were worth quite a few times more. They talked about it as a sign of prosperity when in fact it was sheer speculation in the housing market leading to increased borrowing and rising debts.

Labour’s opposition to budget cuts is not compatible with the news of a prominent Labour politician – Baroness Ashton – getting more than £133,000 a year from October 1914 until December 31st 2017 for doing nothing.

Under Labour the population of Britain rose by not less than 16% in a few years and most of them are on benefits. No wonder the Labour Party is so opposed to benefits reduction. In places like Tower Hamlets, where there is a huge contingent of Muslim families, 42 per cent of them are on benefits. 

The lack of consistency of the Labour Party is appalling and this is the kind of news that the Labour Party does not want ordinary voters to know about.

Saturday, 6 April 2013

In Bangladesh, Islamists propose to kill all non-Muslims

In Bangladesh, Islamists propose to kill all non-Muslims

Some people say that Islam is the same as Nazism. What is happening in Bangladesh right now shows that Bangladeshi Islam is worse than Nazism.

No wonder then that in some Asian countries Buddhists are taking justice into their own hands to get rid of Muslims. Buddhist monks stated that they are afraid because there are far too many Muslims in their countries.

The picture is even more sinister when you look at countries where Muslims are killing Muslims on daily basis. Does the Quran promote attacks against other Muslims? I ask the question because the mass media propaganda that presents Islam as a religion of peace really is merely mass media propaganda and does not reflect what is happening in the real world. 

People of other religions seems to coexist in peace but Islam does not seem to live in peace not even with Muslims. The images of an Afghani Muslim girl brought to Britain with severe injuries shows what Islam is really about. Islamists tried to kill her because she wanted to go to school to get an education.

I reckon that the time for Muslims to start thinking about what Islam is really about is long overdue. What kind of religion is a religion that promotes violence against its own followers? I would say that we are not talking about a religion. It looks and sound much more like a cult of violence.


Emma West case postponed a fifth time

Emma West
Emma West case postponed a fifth time

Cliff Le May from Croydon Branch reports that the case of a vulnerable mother from South London that was detained and falsely accused of racism has been postponed for a fifth time. The witch hunting operation initiated to use a non-political event and transform it into a political act of retribution continues.

Emma West was suffering under extreme stress and was under psychological treatment when the event for which she was accused happened.

British mass media didn’t care and took advantage of a vulnerable individual to carry out a spiteful crusade.

The same mass media that made money by torturing a young woman and her family later forgot about her but the tragedy for Emma West and her relatives continues. 

Apartheid and Ethno Nationalism

Apartheid and Ethno Nationalism

Nelson Mandela
The fundamental argument of the Anti-Apartheid movement headed by Nelson Mandela was that in Africa an African majority was being oppressed by a white European minority. Left-wing thinkers and politicians were the first-ones to support what Nelson Mandela intended to do in South Africa and they created a cult around the public persona of Nelson Mandela.

Paradoxically, when white Britons in the United Kingdom express the same feelings that motivated Nelson Mandela and the Anti-Apartheid Movement, they are persecuted, vilified and attacked.

In more than one way, the British National Party represents genuine concerns about what many perceive as an Apartheid regime in Britain in which white Britons are discriminated against and told that they have to give to somebody else their country and everything generation after generation fought for and died for. Positive Discrimination is Apartheid, it is the concept that the rights of the British majority don’t count or are inferior to the rights of those coming from somewhere else.

So called mainstream political parties promote a process of reverse colonisation and ethnic cleansing and completely disregard genuine concerns of those who want Britain to remain British.

The paradox is that the movement started by Nelson Mandela in South Africa has led to discrimination against white South Africans and to the killing the white South African farmers and of black labourers that remained loyal to their employers. A poverty and crime stricken South Africa, run by a black Nomenklatura, is riddled with corruption and political persecution to the point that new black political parties have appeared to challenge the African National Congress.