The Crucifixion of Jesus and the Holocaust

The Crucifixion of Jesus and the Holocaust

For many centuries, Christian churches depicted Jews as undesirables and as those to be collectively blamed for the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God. Such was the animosity created by centuries of taught hatred that Jews were always seen as inferior beings not to be trusted. Across the Christian world, the strength of such belief led to persecution, torture and expulsion.

In 1492, the year when the crowns of Castile and Aragon became one with Fernando of Aragon and Isabel of Castile, both Jews and Muslims were persecuted, killed, forced to convert to Christianity or forced to leave continental Spain. There are several recorded events throughout history and the Crucifixion of Jesus is very much one of the core beliefs that justified persecution.

What happened in Germany, Austria, Poland and Russia, among other countries, in the 1930s and 1940s came to be because of what happened more than 2,000 years ago. It can be said that has come to be known as the Holocaust is very much a direct consequence of centuries of hatred directly linked to the execution of Jesus of Nazareth.

In cultural terms, across Latin America, and I reckon that in many other regions of the world, people who are thought to be led by avarice or who are mean are usually told ‘Don’t be a Jew’ and is very much one of the stereotypes usually associated with the fact of being Jewish.

Right Policies, Wrong Perception

Right Policies, Wrong Perception

Abu Qatada

For many years, the British National Party has had the right policies but has not been able to talk about its policies via the mass media because of perception based on stereotypes promoted by the mass media. Funnily enough, UKIP is winning spaces by promoting British National Party policies.

At the start, UKIP solely declared aim was Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union. When those in charge realized that British National Party policies were popular, they incorporated British National Party policies.

The fundamental issue remains that talking about policies does not guarantee that the said policies will be implemented. While politically correct organisations talk about policies, the British National Party is the only organisation ready and willing to implement them without delay.

The one word present in the 2010 British National Party Manifesto was ‘repatriation’ that some immediately identified as ‘deportation’, although it was clearly stated that it would be a voluntary process. There is no ambiguity whatsoever regarding what would happen to foreign criminals. The Labour Party administration and the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition has been struggling and wasting tens of millions of Pounds in the process to get rid of undesirables involved in acts of terror.

Under a British National Party administration the monies wasted in endless court appearances, appeals and counter appeals would have been saved and Abu Qatada and many like him would have thrown out without questions asked.

Abu Qatada and many like him have been allowed to laugh about Britain and actually think that Britain is a joke of a country. They have lived at the expense of British taxpayers, wasted taxpayers money and used Britain as a platform to promote hatred and violence forcing decent people to live in fear. Who allows this to happen? Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Labour. Under a British National Party administration, Britain would be free of Muslim extremists in a matter of weeks rather than years.  

Labour immigration policies were criminal policies

Labour immigration policies were criminal policies

One million youngsters out of work and counting and you can say that each young unemployed is potentially a person in pensionable age that will not have saved for a pension. This is the reality of Labour’s ideological stance on immigration.

Then, you have to think that people grow up and have children and that their descendants will inherit not only their genes but they will also inherit their unemployment and in some families unemployment has been around for generations.

When we talk about immigration we talk about employment or lack of it, we talk about housing or lack of it, we talk about healthcare or lack of it, we talk about education or lack of it and et cetera, et cetera.

Baby Holocaust: If those who promote abortion had been aborted

I wonder the kind of world we could have if those who promote abortion had themselves been aborted. The deffenders of abortion never think that they themselves would not be alive today if their parents had chosen abortion and it is something that very much defies reason.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/this-baby-wont-stop-breathing-abortionist-strangled-baby-born-alive-while-n.html

People often talk about the Holocaust and paradoxically most of those who talk about the Holocaust are the ones campaigning to promote an even bigger Holocaust. The number of those killed in concentration camps in World War Two is pale by comparison when you think about the number of those killed every year as a matter of choice.

According to WHO (World Health Organisation), every year in the world an estimated 40-50 million women faced with an unplanned pregnancy decide to have an abortion. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day.

Political Parties in Britain adopt British National Party language

British Politics is changing, Nationalism included

Michael Portillo

It is nonsensical to suggest that Nationalism itself will not change. Leaders come and go and generation after generation the movement will adapt to new circumstances.

The political scene of the 1980s is not the political scene of the 2010s and failure to adapt will effectively mean electoral failure. In desperation, other political forces have been forced by the British National Party to talk the language of British Nationalism.

Despite failure to win seats, more and more people are now supporting the British National Party. Some years ago it would have been impossible to get 40% support but this has actually happened.

Nigel Lawson, Nigel Farage, Michael Portillo, and many others across the political boundaries have adopted the language of the British National Party. 

Tommy Robinson, Leader of the English Defence League (EDL) said that he fears for his life

Tommy Robinson EDL

Tommy Robinson, Leader of the English Defence League (EDL) said that he fears for his life after a group of Islamic Extremists from West Midlands pleaded guilty to planning to bomb a rally organised by the EDL.

At Woolwich Crown Court on Tuesday, Jewel Uddin, Zohaib Ahmed, Mohammed Hasseen, Anzal Hussain, Omar Mohammed Khan and Mohammed Saud were put on trial and convicted and sentencing is due on Thursday, June 6, 2013.

The terrorists were caught by chance when their car was stopped and found to have no insurance. The fact remains that barely failed to carry out the bomb attack because they arrived after the rally had ended.

Tommy Robinson stated that we will continue campaigning because people need to talk about these issues and be more open about what is going on.

We know the threat, we know what is doing to Britain and we know what the consequences will be. All Nationalists should come together for the Common Cause.

Islam and National Socialist Germany

There is no discussion about the cooperation of Islam and National Socialist Germany. Even the man appointed by the British authorities as the genuine representative of Muslims in Palestine was in the end an ally of Adolf Hitler. Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS, created SS divisions entirely composed of Muslim fighters who played an active role in the nightmare that took place in Europe.

The rhetoric of Islamic Extremists is almost identical to the rhetoric of Adolf Hitler but Islamic Extremists go even further: they want to kill anybody and everybody who does not bow to Islam. When European intellectuals compare the Quran to Mein Kampf, taking into account the rhetoric of many Muslim leaders, they certainly have a point about the dangers posed by the militant brands of Islam.